throbber
LL
`
`____
`
`-4
`
`Please type
`
`plus sign
`
`inside this box
`
`Approved for use through 09/30/00
`Patent and Trademark Office U.S DEPARTMENT
`the Paperwork Reduction Aol of 1995 rIo persons are required to respond Ic
`colleclion of inlormattorr unless it displays
`
`Under
`
`PTOISBI0512J97
`0MB 0651-0032
`OF COMMERCE
`valid 0MB control
`
`runrber
`
`TRANSMITTAL
`UTILITY PATENT APPLICATION
`applications under 37 CFR 1.53b
`Only for new nonprovisional
`
`Attorney Docket No
`
`02577.POO1D
`
`Total Pages _4__
`
`First Named Inventor or Application Identifier Keith Lowery et al
`
`Express Mail Label No
`
`ELi 64804887US
`
`ADDRESS
`
`TO
`
`Assistant Commissioner for Patents
`Box Patent Application
`Washington
`20231
`
`ELEMENTS
`APPLICATION
`See MPEP chapter 600 concerning utility patent application contents
`
`..X..
`
`Fee Transmittal Form
`Submit an original and
`
`duplicate for fee processing
`
`-aUI
`
`.g
`
`26
`
`Descriptive
`Cross References
`
`Total Pages
`Specification
`preferred arrangement set forth below
`Titte of the Invention
`to Related Applicafions
`Fed sponsored
`Statement Regarding
`to Microfiche Appendix
`Reference
`Background
`of
`the Invention
`Brief Summary of the Invention
`the Drawings
`of
`Brief Description
`Detailed Description
`Claims
`-Abstract of
`
`if
`
`filed
`
`the Disclosure
`
`Drawingss 35 USC 113
`
`Total Sheets
`
`_.X_
`
`Oath or Declaration
`
`Total Pages
`
`Newly Executed Original or Copy
`
`Copy from Ptior Application 37 CFR 1.63d
`with Box 17 completed Note Box
`for Continuation/Divisional
`DELETIONS OF INVENTORS Signed statement attached deleting
`inventors named in the prior application
`see 37 CFR 1.63d2
`and 1.33b
`
`below
`
`useable if Box 4b is checked
`Incorporation By Reference
`The entire disclosure of
`the prior application from which
`copy of the oath or
`declaration is supplied under Box 4b is considered as being part of
`the disclosure
`of the accompanying application and is hereby incorporated by reference therein
`
`Microfiche Computer Program Appendix
`
`Nucleolide
`
`Submission
`
`and/or Amino Acid Sequence
`if applicable all necessary
`Computer Readable Copy
`Paper Copy identical
`to computer copy
`verifying identity of above copies
`
`Statement
`
`12/01/97
`
`-1-
`
`PTO/SB/05
`
`12/97
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 1
`
`

`
`ACCOMPANYING APPLICATION PARTS
`
`documentss
`Assignment Papers cover sheet
`37 CFR 3.73b Statement where there is an assignee
`
`Power of Attorney
`
`English Translation Document
`
`if applicable
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`IDS/PTO-1449
`
`Copies of
`
`IDS Citations
`
`____
`
`Preliminary Amendment
`
`Return Receipt Postcard MPEP 503 Should be specifically itemized
`
`_____
`
`Small Entity Statements
`
`Statement
`
`filed in prior application Status still proper and desired
`
`______
`
`Certified Copy of Priority Documents if
`
`foreign priority is claimed
`
`Other
`
`____________________________________________________
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`If
`
`CONTINUING APPLICATION check appropriate box and supply the requisite information
`Continuation-in-part CIP
`
`Divisional
`
`Continuation
`
`of pnor application No 08/636477
`
`18
`
`Correspondence Address
`
`Customer Number or Bar Code Label
`
`or
`
`Correspondence Address Below
`
`___________________________________________
`Insert Customer No or Attach Bar Code Label here
`
`NAME
`
`James
`
`Salter Rea No 35.668
`
`BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR
`
`ZAFMAN LLP
`
`ADDRESS
`
`12400 Wdshire Boulevard
`
`Serith Fbor
`
`CITY Los Angeles
`
`Country
`
`U.S.A
`
`STATE
`
`Calomia
`
`ZIP CODE 90025-1026
`
`TELEPHONE 408 720-8598
`
`FAX 408 720-9397
`
`12/01/97
`
`-2
`
`12197
`PTO/SB/05
`0MB 0651-0032
`Approved for use through 09130/00
`Patent and Trademark Office u.s DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 2
`
`

`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present
`
`invention relates to the field of Internet
`
`technology
`
`Specifically the present
`
`invention relates to the creation and management of
`custom World Wide Web sites
`
`DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART
`
`The World Wide Web the Web represents all of
`
`the computers on
`
`10
`
`the Internet
`
`that offer users access
`
`to information on the Internet via
`
`interactive documents or Web pages These Web pages contain hypertext
`
`links that are used to connect any combination of graphics audio video and
`
`text
`
`in
`
`non-linear non-sequential manner Hypertext links are created
`
`using
`
`special software language known as HyperText Mark-Up Language
`15 HTML
`
`sites
`
`Once created Web pages reside on the Web on Web servers or Web
`Web site can contain numerous Web pages Web client machines
`running Web browsers can access these Web pages at Web sites via
`
`20
`
`communications protocol known as HyperText Transport Protocol I-hIP
`
`Web browsers are software interfaces that run on World Wide Web clients to
`
`allow access to Web sites via
`
`simple user interface
`
`Web browser allows
`
`25
`
`Web client
`particular Web page from Web site by specifying
`to request
`Uniform Resource Locator URL
`URL is Web address that identifies the
`Web page and its location on the Web When the appropriate Web site
`receives the URL the Web page corresponding to the requested URL is
`located and if required HTML output
`is generated The HTML output
`
`is
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 3
`
`

`
`then sent via HTTP to the client
`
`for formatting on the clients screen
`
`Although Web pages and Web sites are extremely simple to create the
`proliferation of Web sites on the Internet highlighted
`
`number of problems
`The scope and ability of Web page designer to change the content of the
`Web page was limited by the static nature of Web pages Once created Web
`page remained static until
`
`it was manually modified This in turn limited
`
`the ability of Web site managers to effectively manage their Web sites
`
`10
`
`The Common Gateway Interface CGI standard was developed to
`
`15
`
`20
`
`resolve the problem of allowing dynamic content
`
`to be included in Web
`
`pages CGI calls or procedures enable applications to generate dynamically
`created HTML output
`thus creating Web pages with dynamic content Once
`
`created these CGI applications do not have to be modified in order to
`retrieve new or dynamic data Instead when the Web page is invoked
`CGI calls or procedures are used to dynamically retrieve the
`and to generate Web page
`
`necessary data
`
`CGI applications also enhanced the ability of Web site administrators
`to manage Web sites Administrators no longer have to constantly update
`static Web pages
`
`number of vendors have developed tools for CGI based
`
`development to address the issue of dynamic Web page generation
`
`Companies like SpiderTM and BluestoneTM for example have each created
`
`development
`
`tools for CGI-based Web page development
`
`Another
`
`25
`
`company Haht SoftwareTM has developed Web page generation tool
`
`that
`
`uses BASIC-like scripting language instead of CGI scripting language
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 4
`
`

`
`Tools that generate CGI applications do not however
`
`resolve the
`
`problem of managing numerous Web pages and requests at Web site For
`
`example
`
`single company may maintain hundreds of Web pages at their
`
`Web site Current Web server architecture also does not allow the Web
`
`server to efficiently manage the Web page and process Web client requests
`
`Managing these hundreds of Web pages in
`
`coherent manner and
`
`processing all requests for access to the Web pages is thus
`
`difficult
`
`task
`
`Existing development
`
`tools are limited in their capabilities to facilitate
`
`dynamic Web page generation and do not address the issue of managing
`
`10 Web requests or Web sites
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 5
`
`

`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`It
`
`is therefore an object of the present
`
`invention to provide
`and apparatus for creating and managing custom Web sites Specifically the
`
`method
`
`present
`
`invention claims method and apparatus for managing dynamic
`web page generation requests
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`In one embodiment
`
`the present
`
`invention claims
`
`computer-
`dynamic Web page generation request
`implemented method for managing
`to Web server the computer-implemented method comprising the steps of
`routing the request from the Web server to
`
`page server the page server
`receiving the request and releasing the Web server to process other requests
`
`processing the request
`
`the processing being performed by the page server
`concurrently with the Web server as the Web server processes the other
`requests and dynamically generating Web page in response to the request
`the Web page including data dynamically retrieved from one or more data
`
`sources Other embodiments also include connection caches
`
`to the one or
`
`more data sources page caches for each page server and custom HTML
`extension templates for configuring the Web page
`
`Other objects features and advantages of the present
`
`invention will be
`
`apparent
`
`from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed
`
`description
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 6
`
`

`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Figure illustrates
`
`typical computer system in which the present
`
`invention operates
`
`Figure
`
`illustrates
`
`typical prior art Web server environment
`
`Figure
`
`illustrates
`
`typical prior art Web server environment
`
`in the
`
`form of
`
`flow diagram
`
`10
`
`Figure
`
`illustrates one embodiment of the presently claimed
`
`invention
`
`Figure
`
`illustrates the processing of Web browser request in the
`
`15
`
`form of
`
`flow diagram according to one embodiment of the presently
`
`claimed invention
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 7
`
`

`
`DETAILED DESCRIFflON OF ThE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
`
`The present
`
`invention relates to method and apparatus for
`creating and managing custom Web sites In the following detailed
`
`description numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide
`
`thorough understanding of the present
`
`invention It will be apparent
`
`to one
`
`of ordinary skill
`
`in the art however
`
`that these specific details need not be
`
`used to practice the present
`
`invention In other instances well-known
`
`structures interfaces and processes have not been shown in detail
`
`in order
`
`10
`
`not
`
`to unnecessarily obscure the present
`
`invention
`
`Figure
`
`illustrates
`
`typical computer system 100 in which the present
`
`invention operates
`
`The preferred embodiment of the present
`
`invention is
`
`implemented on an IBMTM Personal Computer manufactured by IBM
`Corporation of Armonk New York An alternate embodiment may be
`
`15
`
`implemented on an RS/6000TM Workstation manufactured by IBM
`Corporation of Armonk New York It will be apparent
`
`to those of ordinary
`
`skill
`
`in the art that other computer system architectures may also be
`
`employed
`
`20
`
`In general such computer systems as illustrated by Figure
`
`comprise
`
`bus 101 for communicating information
`
`processor 102 coupled with the
`
`bus 101 for processing information main memory 103 coupled with the bus
`
`101 for storing information and instructions for the processor 102
`
`read-
`
`25
`
`only memory 104 coupled with the bus 101 for storing static information and
`
`instructions for the processor 102
`
`display device 105 coupled with the bus
`
`101 for displaying information for
`
`computer user an input device 106
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 8
`
`

`
`coupled with the bus 101 for communicating information and command
`
`selections to the processor 102 and mass storage device 107 such as
`
`magnetic disk and associated disk drive coupled with the bus 101 for storing
`
`information and instructions
`
`data storage medium 108 containing digital
`
`information is configured to operate with mass storage device 107 to allow
`
`processor 102 access to the digital
`
`information on data storage medium 108
`
`via bus 101
`
`Processor 102 may be any of wide variety of general purpose
`
`10
`
`processors or microprocessors such as the PentiumTM microprocessor
`
`manufactured by IntelTM Corporation or the RS/6000TM processor
`
`manufactured by IBM Corporation It will be apparent
`
`to those of ordinary
`
`skill
`
`in the art however
`
`that other varieties of processors may also be used
`
`liquid crystal
`
`15
`
`in particular computer system Display device 105 may be
`device cathode ray tube CRT or other suitable display device Mass storage
`conventional hard disk drive floppy disk drive CD
`device 107 may be
`ROM drive or other magnetic or optical data storage device for reading arid
`floppy disk CD-ROM
`
`writing information stored on
`
`hard disk
`
`magnetic tape or other magnetic or optical data storage medium Data
`
`20
`
`storage medium 108 may be
`
`hard disk
`
`floppy disk CD-ROM magnetic
`
`tape or other magnetic or optical data storage medium
`
`In general processor 102 retrieves processing instructions and data
`
`from data storage medium 108 using mass storage device 107 and
`
`25
`
`downloads
`
`this information into random access memory 103 for execution
`
`Processor 102 then executes an instruction stream from random access
`
`memory 103 or read-only memory 104 Command selections and
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 9
`
`

`
`information input at input device 106 are used to direct the flow of
`
`instructions executed by processor 102 Equivalent
`
`input device 106 may also
`
`be
`
`pointing device such as
`
`conventional mouse or trackball device The
`
`results of this processing execution are then displayed on display device 105
`
`The preferred embodiment of the present
`
`invention is implemented
`
`as
`
`software module which may be executed on
`
`computer system such as
`
`computer system 100 in
`
`conventional maimer Using well known
`
`techniques the application software of the preferred embodiment
`
`is stored
`
`10
`
`on data storage medium 108 and subsequently loaded into and executed
`
`within computer system 100 Once initiated the software of the preferred
`
`embodiment operates in the maimer described below
`
`typical prior art Web server environment Web
`Figure
`client 200 can make URL requests to Web server 201 or Web server 202 Web
`
`illustrates
`
`15
`
`servers 201 and 202 mclude Web server executables 201E and 202E
`respectively that perform the processing of Web client requests Each Web
`
`and 2021
`
`20
`
`25
`
`number of Web pages 2011
`server may have
`Depending on the URL specified by the Web client 200 the request may be
`routed by either Web server executable 201E to Web page 201
`example or from Web server executable 202E to Web page 202
`client 200 can continue making URL requests to retrieve other Web pages
`Web client 200 can also use hyperlinks within each Web page to jump to
`other Web pages or to other locations within the same Web page
`
`for
`
`Web
`
`illustrates this prior art Web server environment
`
`Figure
`flow diagram In processing block 300 the Web client makes
`
`of
`
`in the form
`
`URL
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 10
`
`

`
`request This URL request is examined by the Web browser to determine the
`
`appropriate Web server to route the request
`
`to in processing block 302 In
`
`processing block 304 the request is then transmitted from the Web browser
`
`to
`
`the appropriate Web server and in processing block 306 the Web server
`
`executable examines the URL to determine whether
`
`it
`
`is
`
`HTML document
`
`or CGI application If the request is for an HTML document 308 then the
`
`Web server executable locates the document
`
`in processing block 310 The
`
`document
`
`is then transmitted back through the requesting Web browser for
`
`formatting and display in processing block 312
`
`10
`
`If
`
`the URL request is for CGI application 314 however the Web
`
`server executable locates the CCI application
`processmg block 316 The
`CCI application then executes and outputs HTML output
`318 and finally the HTML output
`
`is transmitted back to requesting Web
`
`in processing block
`
`15
`
`browser
`
`for formatting and display in processing block 320
`
`This prior art Web server environment does not however provide
`
`any mechanism for managing the Web requests or the Web sites As Web
`sites grow and as the number of Web clients and requests increase Web site
`
`20
`
`management becomes
`
`crucial need
`
`For example
`
`large Web site may receive thousands of requests or
`
`hits in
`
`single day Current Web servers process each of these requests on
`single machine namely the Web server machine Although these
`
`25
`
`machines may be running multi-threaded operating systems that allow
`
`transactions to be processed by independent
`
`threads all the threads are
`
`nevertheless on
`
`single machine sharing
`
`processor As such the Web
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 11
`
`

`
`executable thread may hand off
`
`request to
`
`processing thread but both
`
`threads will still have to be handled by the processor on the Web server
`
`machine When numerous requests are being simultaneously processed by
`
`multiple threads on
`
`single machine the Web server can slow down
`
`significantly and become highly inefficient
`
`The claimed invention
`
`addresses this need by utilizing
`
`partitioned architecture to facilitate the
`
`creation and management of custom Web sites and servers
`
`Figure
`
`illustrates one embodiment of the presently claimed
`
`10
`
`invention Web client 200 issues
`
`URL request that is processed to
`
`determined proper routing In this embodiment the request is routed to
`
`Web server 201 Instead of Web server executable 201E processing the URL
`
`request however Interceptor 400 intercepts the request and routes it
`
`to
`
`Dispatcher 402 In one embodiment Interceptor 400 resides on the Web
`
`15
`
`server machine as an extension to Web server 201 This embodiment
`
`is
`
`appropriate for Web servers such as NetsiteTM from Netscape that support
`
`such extensions
`
`number of public domain Web servers such as NCSATM
`
`from the National Center for Supercomputing Applications
`
`at the
`
`University of illinois Urbana-Champaign however do not provide support
`
`20
`
`for this type of extension Thus in an alternate embodiment Interceptor 400
`via an intermediate program to Web
`
`is an independent module connected
`
`server 201 This intermediate program can be
`
`simple CGI application
`
`program that connects Interceptor 400 to Web server 201 Alternate
`
`intermediate programs the perform the same functionality can also be
`
`25
`
`implemented
`
`In one embodiment of the invention Dispatcher 402 resides on
`
`10
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 12
`
`

`
`different machine than Web server 201 This embodiment overcomes the
`
`limitation described above in prior art Web servers wherein all processing
`
`is performed by the processor on
`
`single machine By routing the request to
`
`Dispatcher 402 residing on
`
`different machine than the Web server
`
`executable 201E the request can then be processed by
`
`different processor
`than the Web server executable 201E Web server executable 201E is thus
`
`free to continue servicing client requests on Web server 201 while the
`
`request
`
`is processed t1off-line at
`
`the machine on which Dispatcher 402
`
`resides
`
`10
`
`Dispatcher 402 can however
`
`also reside on the same machine as the
`
`Web server The Web site administrator has the option of configuring
`
`Dispatcher 402 on the same machine as Web server 201 taking into account
`
`variety of factors pertinent
`
`to
`
`particular Web site such as the size of the
`
`15
`
`Web site the number of Web pages and the number of hits at the Web site
`
`Although this embodiment will not enjoy the advantage described above
`
`namely off-loading the processing of Web requests from the Web server
`
`machine the embodiment does allow flexibility
`
`for
`
`small Web site to grow
`
`For example
`
`small Web site administrator can use
`
`single machine for
`
`20
`
`both Dispatcher 402 and Web server 201 initially then off-load Dispatcher 402
`
`onto
`
`separate machine as the Web site grows The Web site can thus take
`
`advantage of other features of the present
`
`invention regardless of whether
`
`the site has separate machines configured as Web servers and dispatchers
`
`25
`
`Dispatcher 402 receives the intercepted request and then dispatches
`
`the
`
`request to one of
`
`number of Page servers 404
`
`For example if Page
`
`server 404
`
`receives the dispatched request
`
`it processes the request and
`
`11
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 13
`
`

`
`retrieves the data from an appropriate data source such as data source 406
`
`data source 408 or data source 410 Data sources as used in the present
`
`application include databases spreadsheets files and any other type of data
`
`repository Page server 404
`
`can retrieve data from more than one data
`
`source and incorporate the data from these multiple data sources in
`Web page
`
`single
`
`hi one embodiment each Page server 4041
`
`resides on
`
`separate
`
`machine on the network to distribute the processing of the request
`
`10
`
`Dispatcher 402 maintains
`
`variety of information regarding each Page server
`
`on the network and dispatches requests based on this information For
`
`example Dispatcher 402 retains dynamic information regarding the data
`
`sources that any given Page server can access Dispatcher 402 thus examines
`
`particular request and determines which Page servers can service the URL
`
`15
`
`request Dispatcher 402 then hands off the request to the appropriate Page
`
`server
`
`For example if
`
`the URL request requires financial data from data
`
`source 408 dispatcher 402 will
`
`first examine an information list Dispatcher
`
`20
`
`402 may determine that Page server 4043 for example has access to the
`
`requisite data in data source 408 Dispatcher 402 will
`
`thus route the URL
`
`request to Page server 4043 This connection caching functionality is
`
`described in more detail below under the heading Performance
`
`25
`
`Alternately Dispatcher 402 also has the ability to determine whether
`
`particular Page server already has the necessary data cached in the Page
`
`servers page cache described in more detail below under the heading
`
`12
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 14
`
`

`
`Performance Dispatcher 402 may thus determine that Page server 4041
`
`and 4042 are both logged into Data source 408 but that Page server 4042
`
`has the financial
`
`information already cached in Page server 4042s page
`
`cache
`
`In this case Dispatcher 402 will
`
`route the URL request to Page server
`
`4042 to more efficiently process the request
`
`Finally Dispatcher 402 may determine that
`
`number or all Page
`
`servers 4041
`
`are logged into Data source 408 In this scenario
`
`Dispatcher 402 can examine the number of requests that each Page server is
`
`10
`
`servicing and route the request to the least busy page server This load
`
`balancing capability can significantly increase performance at
`
`busy Web
`
`site and is discussed in more detail below under the heading Scalability
`
`If for example Page server 4042 receives the request Page server
`
`15
`
`4042 will process the request While Page server 4042 is processing the
`request Web server executable 201E can concurrently process other Web
`
`client requests This partitioned architecture thus allows both Page server
`
`4042 and Web server executable 201E to simultaneously process different
`requests thus increasing the efficiency of the Web site Page server 4042
`Web page in response to the Web client request and
`dynamically generates
`the dynamic Web page is then either transmitted back to requesting Web
`
`client 200 or stored on machine that is accessible to Web server 201 for later
`
`retrieval
`
`Web page
`One embodiment of the claimed invention also provides
`designer with HTML extensions or dyna tags These dyna tags provide
`customized I-ITML functionality to Web page designer
`
`to allow the
`
`20
`
`25
`
`13
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 15
`
`

`
`designer to build customized HTML templates that specify the source and
`
`placement of retrieved data For example in one embodiment
`HTML extension tag specifies
`data source and
`column name to allow the
`HTML template to identify the data source to log into and the column name
`
`dynatext
`
`from which to retrieve data Alternatively dyna-anchor
`
`tags allow the
`
`designer to build hyperlink queries while dynablock tags provide the
`
`designer with the ability to iterate through blocks of data Page servers use
`these HTML templates to create dynamic Web pages Then as described
`above these dynamic Web pages are either transmitted back to requesting
`10 Web client 200 or stored on machine that is accessible to Web server 201 for
`
`later retrieval
`
`The presently claimed invention provides numerous advantages
`prior art Web servers including advantages
`
`in the areas of performance
`
`over
`
`15
`
`security extensibility and scalability
`
`Performance
`
`20
`
`One embodiment of the claimed invention utilizes connection
`
`caching and page caching to improve performance
`
`Each Page server can be
`
`configured to maintain
`
`cache of connections
`
`to numerous data sources
`
`For example as illustrated in Figure
`
`Page server 4041 can retrieve data
`
`from data source 406 data source 408 or data source 410 Page server 4041
`
`25
`
`can maintain connection cache 4121 containing connections
`
`to each of data
`
`source 406 data source 408 and data source 410 thus eliminating connect
`
`times from the Page servers to those data sources
`
`14
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 16
`
`

`
`Additionally another embodiment of the present
`invention supports
`the caching of finished Web pages to optimize the performance of the data
`
`source being utilized This page caching feature illustrated in Figure as
`
`Page cache 414 allows the Web site administrator to optimize the
`
`performance of data sources by caching Web pages that are repeatedly
`accessed Once the Web page is cached subsequent requests or hits will
`utilize the cached Web page rather than re-accessing the data source This
`
`can radically improve the performance of the data source
`
`10
`
`Security
`
`invention allows the Web site administrator to utilize
`The present
`15 multiple levels of security to manage the Web site In one embodiment
`
`the
`
`Page server can utilize all standard encryption and site security features
`provided by the Web server
`
`In another embodiment
`
`the Page server can be
`
`configured to bypass connection
`
`caches 4121-n descnbed above for
`
`particular data source and to require entry of
`
`user-supplied identification
`
`20
`
`and password for the particular data source the user is trying to access
`
`Additionally another embodiment of
`
`the presently claimed invention
`requires no real-time access of data sources The Web page caching ability
`
`described above enables additional security for those sites that want
`
`to
`
`25
`
`publish non-interactive
`
`content
`
`from internal
`
`information systems but do
`
`not want real-time Internet accessibility to those internal
`
`information
`
`systems In this instance the Page server can act as
`
`replication and staging
`
`15
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 17
`
`

`
`agent and create Web pages in batches rather than in real-time These
`replicated Web pages are then staged for access at
`later time and access
`to the Web pages in this scenario is possible even if the Page server and
`
`dispatcher are not present later
`
`In yet another embodiment the Page server can make
`single pass
`through Web library and compile Web site that exists in the traditional
`
`form of separately available files
`
`Web library is
`collection of related Web
`books and Web pages More specifically the Web library is
`organization of Web document
`
`templates together with all
`
`the associated
`
`hierarchical
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`data source mformation Information about an entire Web site is thus
`
`contained in
`
`file thus simplifying the problem of deploying
`Web sites across multiple Page servers The process of deploying the Web
`
`single physical
`
`site in this embodiment
`
`is essentially
`
`simple copy of
`
`single file
`
`Extensibility
`
`One embodiment of
`
`invention provides the Web site
`administrator with Object Linking and Embedding OLE 2.0 extensions to
`
`the present
`
`extend the page creation process These OLE 2.0 extensions also allow
`information submitted over the Web to be processed with user-supplied
`
`functionality Utilizing development
`
`tools such as Visual Basic Visual
`
`or PowerBuilder
`
`that support
`
`the creation of OLE 2.0 automation the Web
`
`25
`
`site administrator can add features and modify the behavior of the Page
`
`servers described above This extensibility allows one embodiment of the
`
`claimed invention to be incorporated with existing technology to develop an
`
`16
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 18
`
`

`
`infinite number of custom web servers
`
`For example OLE 2.0 extensions allow Web site administrator to
`
`encapsulate existing business rules in an OLE 2.0 automation interface to be
`
`accessed over the Web One example of
`
`business rule is the steps involved
`
`in the payoff on an installment or mortgage loan The payoff may involve
`
`for example taking into account
`
`the current balance the date and the interest
`
`accrued since the last payment Most organizations already have this type of
`
`business rule implemented using various applications
`
`such as Visual Basic
`
`10
`
`for client-server environments or CICS programs on mainframes If
`applications are OLE 2.0 compliant the Page server dynaobject HTML
`
`these
`
`extension tag can be used to encapsulated
`
`the application in an OLE 2.0
`
`automation interface
`
`The Page server is thus extensible and can incorporate
`
`the existing application with the new Page server functionality
`
`15
`
`Scalabifity
`
`One embodiment of the claimed invention allows plug and play
`
`20
`
`scalability As described above referring to Figure
`
`Dispatcher 402
`
`maintains information about all
`
`the Page servers configured to be serviced by
`
`Dispatcher 402 Any number of Page servers can thus be plugged into the
`
`configuration illustrated in Figure
`
`and the Page servers will be instantly
`
`activated as the information is dynamically updated in Dispatcher 402 The
`
`25 Web site administrator can thus manage the overhead of each Page server
`
`and modify each Page servers load as necessary to improve performance
`
`In this manner each Page server will cooperate with other Page servers
`
`17
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 19
`
`

`
`within multi-server environment Dispatcher 402 can examine the load on
`each Page server and route new requests according to each Page server1s
`
`available resources This load-balancing across multiple Page servers can
`Web sites performance
`
`significantly increase
`
`Figure illustrates the processing of Web browser request in the
`form of
`
`flow diagram according to one embodiment of the presently
`Web browser sends
`URL request to Web server in
`
`claimed invention
`
`processing block 500 In processing block 502 the Web server receives the
`URL request and an interceptor
`
`then intercepts the handling of the request
`
`10
`
`in processing block 504 The interceptor connects to
`dispatcher and sends
`the URL request to the dispatcher in processing block 506 In processing block
`508 the dispatcher determines which Page servers can handle the request
`The dispatcher also determines which Page server is processing the fewest
`
`15
`
`requests in processing block 510 and in processing block 512 the dispatcher
`sends the URL request to an appropriate Page server The Page server
`receives the request and produces an HTML document
`
`processmg block
`514 The Page server then responds to the dispatcher with notthcation of the
`name of the cached HTML document
`
`in processing block 516 In
`
`processing
`
`20
`
`block 518 the dispatcher
`
`responds to the interceptor with the document
`
`name and the interceptor
`then replaces the requested URL with the newly
`generated HTML document
`
`in processing block 520 The Web server then
`sends the new HTML document
`
`in processing block
`522 Finally the Web browser receives and displays the HTML document
`
`requesting client
`
`to the
`
`25
`
`created by the Page server at processing block 524
`
`Thus method and apparatus for creating and managing custom Web
`
`18
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 20
`
`

`
`sites is disclosed These specific arrangements and methods described herein
`
`are merely illustrative of the principles of the present
`
`invention Numerous
`
`modifications in form and detail may be made by those of ordinary skill
`
`in
`
`the art without departing from the scope of the present
`
`invention Although
`
`this invention has been shown in relation to
`
`particular preferred
`
`embodiment it should not be considered so limited Rather
`
`the present
`
`invention is limited only by the scope of the appended claims
`
`19
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 21
`
`

`
`CLAIMS
`
`We claim
`
`dynamic Web
`computer-implemented method for managing
`page generation request to Web server said computer-implemented
`method comprising the steps of
`
`routing said request from said Web server to
`
`page server said page
`server receiving said request and releasing said Web server to process other
`
`requests
`
`10
`
`processing said request said processing being performed by said page
`server concurrently with said Web server as said Web server processes said
`other requests and
`
`dynamically generating Web page in response to said request said
`Web page including data dynamically retrieved from one or more data
`
`15
`
`sources
`
`The computer-implemented method in Claim herein said step
`
`of routing said request includes the steps of
`
`intercepting said request at said Web server
`
`20
`
`routing said request from said Web server to
`
`dispatcher and
`
`dispatching said request to said page server
`
`20
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1005, p. 22
`
`

`
`The computer-implemented method in Claim wherein said step
`
`of processing said request includes the step of identifying said one or more
`
`data sources from which to retrieve said data
`
`The computer-implemented met

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket