throbber
1
`
`Petitioner Samsung - SAM1013
`
`

`
`corresponds to 6 bits per symbol, while the
`remaining
`6
`symbols
`are
`reserved
`for
`overhead
`f unct ions
`(syn chroni zation ,
`control, etc). Symbols are transmitted at a
`4 kbaud rate, which gives a gross bit rate
`of 24 kbps.
`
`The spectrum efficiency of the proposed
`modulation is 0.48 bps/Hz, which is much
`higher
`than
`standard
`1200
`bps
`paging
`channels,
`(0.048 bps/Hz). or even ERMES
`system.
`(0.25 bps/Hz). This is still not as
`good as
`some digital cellular networks,
`which can be attributed to the following
`differences.
`
`The spectrum mask for the paging system
`to be
`tighter
`in order
`to reduce
`has
`interference when a foreign transmitter in
`an adjacent
`channel
`is closer
`than the
`monitored transmitter (near-far problem). In
`cellular systems the network detects user
`proximity to different antenna sites and
`switches connection to the nearest
`one
`(handoff
`feature) .
`This
`effectively
`eliminates the near—far problem and allows
`a higher level of interchannel interference.
`
`environment
`simulcast
`the
`Further,
`prevents using coherent detection, since a
`moving pager would need to rapidly switch
`lock
`from one
`transmitter
`to
`another
`according
`to
`fading
`variations.
`This
`eliminates
`implementation of quadrature
`modulation techniques and effectively halves
`the efficiency.
`power
`DC
`receiver
`the
`Finally,
`efficiency dictates operation with brief
`receiver enable intervals (tens of symbols)
`followed by extended "sleep" periods, which
`prevents
`complex equalization algorithms
`based on equalizer
`training procedures.
`Therefore most of the modulation techniques
`currently used in cellular systems are not
`applicable in paging networks.
`
`I I I EXPERIMENTS
`
`technical
`the
`to investigate
`In order
`feasibility of
`the
`proposed modulation
`technique we have carried out
`a set of
`laboratory and field experiments at
`the
`University of Mississippi
`in the 930 MHz
`frequency
`band.
`The
`transmitters
`are
`constructed by Glenayre, Quincy,
`IL. Bach
`transmitter has four subtransmitters capable
`of I-PSK over a subset of the 8 frequencies.
`Outputs of the subtransmitters are combined
`and
`sent
`to
`a
`common
`antenna.
`Two
`transmitters were
`installed seven miles
`apart
`and
`synchronized
`to
`provide
`a
`simulcast overlap area with approximately 35
`dnuv/m signal strength.
`
`A receiver, constructed by Wireless Access,
`San Jose. CA, consists of an RF section
`which
`down
`converts
`the
`signal
`to
`a
`frequency band
`below 100
`kHz,
`an All)
`converter, a DSP processor which performs
`signal detection through DPT analysis. and
`a PC to control
`the operation and present
`results. Error
`free reception has
`been
`
`;
`
`achieved both in laboratory and field tests
`for several hours, which corresponds to a
`BER < 10'’.
`
`transmitter
`spectrum at
`signal
`The
`output is presented in Fig. 1, and 2. Fig. 1
`shows
`a
`spectrum of
`a
`single
`symbol
`(frequencies 1. 2. 4. and 8 ON, and 3, 5, 6,
`7 OFF)
`repeatedly transmitted. It shows a
`low level
`intermodulation products.
`The
`dashed line represents the proposed emission
`mask. with the pass—band level 6 dB above
`peaks, corresponding to the level obtained
`when all subtransmitters broadcast on the
`same frequency.
`
`Fig. 2 shows the spectrum of the signal
`sending pseudo random data (a repeated 512
`symbols
`long message),
`together with the
`emission mask (dashed line). It is evident
`that the allocated frequency band is fully
`utilized, which
`indicates
`the
`spectrum
`efficiency of
`the
`proposed modulation
`technique.
`
`the spectrum of several
`shows
`3
`Fig.
`isolated symbols the signal obtained by PFT
`processing in a digital oscilloscope. The
`FFT window was rectangular with 200 us width
`(which
`corresponds
`to
`a
`5
`kHz
`bin
`separation), synchronized externally to fit
`the middle of
`the 250 ps symbol
`interval.
`Four
`traces are shown in the plot,
`each
`obtained
`for different
`symbol.
`Such
`a
`diagram corresponds to eye diagrams, except
`it is in frequency domain instead of
`the
`time domain.
`It
`shows
`that
`symbols
`are
`distinguishable by a proper processing.
`
`IV POSSIBLE VARIATIONS
`
`considered
`that were
`Alternatives
`include multicarrier on-off keying (HOOK)
`with all eight
`subcarriers
`independently
`keyed. This would increase the bit rate to
`32 kbps, but increase the complexity of both
`transmitters and receivers.
`
`transmitters would require eight
`The
`subtransmitters with
`amplitude modulated
`power amplifiers, and one more step in the
`cascade
`of
`hybrid
`circuit
`combiners .
`Alternately a single linear power amplifier
`could be used, with symbols generated by DSP
`processing in the baseband, brought up to
`the
`target
`frequency
`range
`by
`SS3
`modulation. This approach is expected to
`have difficulties meeting the emission mask,
`due to intermodulation products.
`
`increase
`system would
`MOOK
`The
`complexity of the receiver with respect
`to
`automatic gain control and threshold setting
`for
`subcarrier
`detection.
`Alternative
`receiver design, with battery of filters
`instead of EFT processing, is rejected based
`on computer simulation which predicted high
`intercarrier interference.
`
`2
`
`

`
`10dB/
`
`§[50dB
`
`, 1
`
`;
`
`B_E§_3DOHz
`
`‘/B1'r<Hz
`
`20.0dBm
`RL:
`F” “’I
`I
`
`1DdB/
`! "‘
`
`“i”
`
`fl[5DdB
`
`§j_3s
`
`D:
`
`‘ SPF:1DOkHz
`CNF:93G.9MHz A
`Fig.
`2 Spectrum of the signal carrying a pseudo random data
`
`aa3ooHz
`
`VB1kH2
`
`-_-__--1
`u.'M_u~l\rm
`‘
`1
`SPF: 1DO'r<H;z
`CHE‘: 930. QIVI.‘-iz
`Fig.
`1 Spectrum of a single symbol repeatediy transmitted
`
`i
`I
`
`xI
`
`3
`
`

`
`22-Nov-92
`19:21:25
`
`:Mn(FFT(|))
`19 kHz
`
`1 2a nu
`
`DC 5
`
`21UDC{a
`
`F‘
`
`2nc17.av
`
`D STOPPED
`
`Fig.
`
`3 Frequency domain eye diagram obtained by EFT processing
`
`V
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`The permutation modulation technique
`delivers higher bit
`rates
`and better
`spectrum
`efficiency
`than
`modulation
`techniques currently used for paging. The
`higher efficiency attained in cellular
`networks
`is
`a
`result
`of
`the
`inherent
`differences in the type of services offered.
`The choice
`is made based on
`simulcast
`operation with long symbol
`intervals and
`noncoherent detection. and moderate cost,
`low power
`receiver
`based
`on digital
`processing.
`
`Laboratory and field tests proved the
`technical
`feasibility of
`the
`proposed
`technique.
`The
`research
`regarding
`optimization of receivers and transmitters,
`symbol
`synchronization based on digital
`processing, code table optimization, etc.,
`is underway.
`
`been
`This modulation technique has
`included in HTBL's petition to the FCC for
`the Nationwide Wireless Network service [4],
`and,
`the
`FCC has granted a
`tentative
`pioneers preference to this proposal [5].
`
`REFERENCES
`
`"Permutation modulation“,
`D. slepian,
`Proceeding of the IEEE, March 1965. PD.
`228-237.
`‘The Performance of PSK
`E. Brookner,
`Permutation Modulation
`in
`Fading
`Channels and Their Comparison Based on
`a General Method for the comparison of
`H-ary Hodu1ations',
`IEEE Trans.
`on
`Comm. Tech., Vol.
`cou—17, No. 6, Dec.
`1969. PD 616-639.
`'Mu1ticarrier
`J.A.C.
`Birnhan,
`Modulation for Data Transmission: An
`Idea Whose
`Time Has
`Come".
`IEEE
`Communications Magazine, May 1990. pp.
`5-14.
`Mobile Telecommunications Technologies
`Corporation. "Petition for Rulemaking
`to Allocate 150 kHz in the 930-931 MHz
`Band
`and
`to Establish Rules
`and
`Policies
`for
`a Nationwide Wireless
`Network (NWN) Service", Before the FCC,
`Nov. 12, 1991.
`Communication
`Personal
`FCC,
`"New
`Services Proposed (Gen. Docket No. 94-
`314, BT Docket 92-100)", FCC News, July
`17. 1992.
`
`;
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket