throbber
11/18/2015
`
`American College of Rheumatology
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Arthritis 8: Rheumatism 3:ia'ii§..:li7l.tT‘::i..Lc.L(:f
`
`‘_'.
`
`‘C’
`
`;
`
`munmou . ruumuun . unuutu hi-l1W| LEY- BLACKWELL
`
`
`Arthritis & Rheumatism, Volume 60,
`
`October 2009 Abstract Supplement
`The 2009 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting
`Philadelphia October 16-21, 2009.
`
`Am“; 3 Rhwmm
`
`PN400 Significantly Reduces The Incidence Of Gastric Ulcers Compared
`With Enteric-Coated Naproxen In Patients Requiring Chronic NSAID
`Therapy Regardless Of Low-Dose Aspirin Use: Results From Two
`Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trials
`
`Goldstein‘, Jay L., Hochberg2, Marc C., Fort3, John G., Zhang3, Ying,
`Sostek4, Mark
`
`University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
`University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
`POZEN lnc., Chapel Hill, NC
`Astraleneca, Wilmington, DE
`
`Purpose:
`Co—therapy with proton pump inhibitors reduces the risk of NSAID-
`associated ulcers but, in practice, adherence is often sub—optimal,
`leading to poor |ong—term clinical outcomes (Van Soest et al. Aliment
`Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:265—275). Two Phase 3 studies evaluated the
`upper gastrointestinal (UGI) efficacy and safety of PN400, a fixed—dose
`combination tablet designed to provide sequential delivery of
`immediate—release (IR) esomeprazole (20 mg) and enteric—coated (EC)
`naproxen (500 mg), compared with EC naproxen (500 mg) alone in at—risk
`patients.
`Method:
`
`Two randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter studies enrolled H.
`pylori—negative patients with OA, RA, or any other condition requiring
`chronic NSAID therapy at risk of ulcers (age >=5O yrs or 18-49 yrs with a
`history of gastric ulcer [GU] or duodenal ulcer [DU] within the past 5 yrs).
`Patients were randomized to PN400 BID or EC naproxen 500 mg BID for 6
`months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of GUs (>=3
`mm diameter with depth) observed by endoscopy at 1, 3, and 6 months.
`A planned pooled analysis to assess the effect of low—dose aspirin use
`(LDA <=325 mg) on GU incidence, and an analysis of pre—specified
`NSAlD—associated UGI AEs (including DU) were also conducted.
`Results:
`
`Study A: 438 patients were randomized, 434 were treated: Study B: 423
`patients were randomized, 420 were treated. Baseline demographics
`were similar between groups in both studies. Approximately 82% of
`patients had OA and 6% had RA. In both studies, the incidence of GUs
`over 6 months was significantly lower in the PN400 groups vs the EC
`naproxen groups (Table). The pooled incidence of GUS was significantly
`lower in the PN400 group vs the EC naproxen group in LDA users (n=201)
`(3.0% vs 28.4%, p<0.001) and non-users (n=653) (6.4% vs 22.2%, p<0.001).
`The previously described pre—specified secondary endpoint was
`significantly lower in the PN400 groups (Table).
`
`Study A
`
`EC
`
`Study B
`
`EC
`
`PN400
`(n=218)
`GU, n (%) 9 (4.1)
`DU, n (%)
`1 (0.5)
`UGI
`114
`AE/DU, n (52.3)
`http://www.b|ackwelIpublishing.com/acrmeeting/abstract.asp?M eeting|D=761&id=80472
`
`naproxen
`(n=216)
`50 (23.1)
`11 (5.1)
`149 (69.0)
`
`PN400 naproxen
`(n=210) (n=210)
`p
`<0.001 15 (7.1) 51 (24.3)
`0.003 2 (1.0)
`12 (5.7)
`<0.00l 114
`151 (71.9)
`(54.3)
`
`p
`<0.001
`0.007
`<0.00l
`
`patent owner EX_ 2007
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPRZO1 501718
`
`1/2
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2007
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`11/18/2015
`
`American College ct Rheumatology
`
`(%)
`Conc:luslon:
`PN400 significantly reduces the incidence of Gus, regardless of
`concomitant LDA use, and DUs in at-risk. patients. PN400, a f1Xed-dose
`combination of EC naproxen 500 mg and IR esomeprazole 20 mg,
`provides built-in gastroprotection and offers a treatment option for
`decreasing NSAID-ulcer occurrence in an appropriate target patient
`population.
`
`To cite this abstract, please use the following lnformaHon:
`Goldstein, Jay L., Hochberg, Marc C., Fort, John G., Zhang, Ying,
`SOJtek. Marte; PN400 SlgnlftcanHy Reduces the Incidence of Gastric Ulcers
`Compared with Enterlc-Coated Naproxen In Patients Requiring Chronic
`NSAID Therapy Regardless of Low-Dose Aspirin Use: Results From Two
`PraspecHve, Randomized Controlled Trials labstractl. ArthrHls Rheum
`2009;60 Suppl 10 :842
`DOI: 10.1002/art.25922
`
`Home I MeeHng Index I Search I ACR Annual MeeHng Page I Onnne Journal I
`Privacy Policy
`
`Copyright© 2013 American College of Rheumatology
`
`http://www.blackwel lpublishi ng.can/acrmeeli ng/abstract.asp?MeelinglD=761&id=80472
`
`212
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2007
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket