throbber
NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 3 of 28
`
` (Nos. 1541, 3046)
`XX-XXXX-RXX-Rev. Month, 200x
`
`PREVACID®
`(lansoprazole)
`Delayed-Release Capsules
`DESCRIPTION
`The active ingredient in PREVACID (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules is a substituted
`benzimidazole, 2-[[[3-methyl-4-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-2-pyridyl] methyl] sulfinyl] benzimidazole, a
`compound that inhibits gastric acid secretion. Its empirical formula is C16H14F3N3O2S with a molecular
`weight of 369.37. The structural formula is:
`
`Lansoprazole is a white to brownish-white odorless crystalline powder which melts with
`decomposition at approximately 166°C. Lansoprazole is freely soluble in dimethylformamide; soluble in
`methanol; sparingly soluble in ethanol; slightly soluble in ethyl acetate, dichloromethane and acetonitrile;
`very slightly soluble in ether; and practically insoluble in hexane and water.
`Lansoprazole is stable when exposed to light for up to two months. The compound degrades in aqueous
`solution, the rate of degradation increasing with decreasing pH. At 25°C the t1/2 is approximately 0.5 hour
`at pH 5.0 and approximately 18 hours at pH 7.0.
`PREVACID is supplied in delayed-release capsules for oral administration. The delayed-release
`capsules contain the active ingredient, lansoprazole, in the form of enteric-coated granules and are
`available in two dosage strengths: 15 mg and 30 mg of lansoprazole per capsule. Each delayed-release
`capsule contains enteric-coated granules consisting of lansoprazole, hydroxypropyl cellulose, low
`substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose, colloidal silicon dioxide, magnesium carbonate, methacrylic acid
`copolymer, starch, talc, sugar sphere, sucrose, polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and titanium dioxide.
`Components of the gelatin capsule include gelatin, titanium dioxide, D&C Red No. 28, FD&C Blue No. 1,
`FD&C Green No. 3*, and FD&C Red No. 40.
`* PREVACID 15-mg capsules only.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism
`PREVACID Delayed-Release Capsules contain an enteric-coated granule formulation of lansoprazole.
`Absorption of lansoprazole begins only after the granules leave the stomach. Absorption is rapid, with
`mean peak plasma levels of lansoprazole occurring after approximately 1.7 hours. Peak plasma
`concentrations of lansoprazole (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) of
`lansoprazole are approximately proportional in doses from 15 mg to 60 mg after single-oral administration.
`Lansoprazole does not accumulate and its pharmacokinetics are unaltered by multiple dosing.
`
`
`Page 1 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 4 of 28
`
`Absorption
`The absorption of lansoprazole is rapid, with mean Cmax occurring approximately 1.7 hours after oral
`dosing, and relatively complete with absolute bioavailability over 80%. In healthy subjects, the mean
`(±SD) plasma half-life was 1.5 (± 1.0) hours. Both Cmax and AUC are diminished by about 50% if the drug
`is given 30 minutes after food as opposed to the fasting condition. There is no significant food effect if the
`drug is given before meals.
`
`Distribution
`Lansoprazole is 97% bound to plasma proteins. Plasma protein binding is constant over the concentration
`range of 0.05 to 5.0 µg/mL.
`
`Metabolism
`Lansoprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver. Two metabolites have been identified in measurable
`quantities in plasma (the hydroxylated sulfinyl and sulfone derivatives of lansoprazole). These metabolites
`have very little or no antisecretory activity. Lansoprazole is thought to be transformed into two active
`species which inhibit acid secretion by (H+,K+)-ATPase within the parietal cell canaliculus, but are not
`present in the systemic circulation. The plasma elimination half-life of lansoprazole does not reflect its
`duration of suppression of gastric acid secretion. Thus, the plasma elimination half-life is less than two
`hours, while the acid inhibitory effect lasts more than 24 hours.
`
`Elimination
`Following single-dose oral administration of lansoprazole, virtually no unchanged lansoprazole was
`excreted in the urine. In one study, after a single oral dose of 14C-lansoprazole, approximately one-third
`of the administered radiation was excreted in the urine and two-thirds was recovered in the feces. This
`implies a significant biliary excretion of the metabolites of lansoprazole.
`
`Special Populations
`Geriatric
`The clearance of lansoprazole is decreased in the elderly, with elimination half-life increased
`approximately 50% to 100%. Because the mean half-life in the elderly remains between 1.9 to 2.9 hours,
`repeated once daily dosing does not result in accumulation of lansoprazole. Peak plasma levels were not
`increased in the elderly.
`Pediatric
`The pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole has not been investigated in patients <18 years of age.
`Gender
`In a study comparing 12 male and 6 female human subjects, no gender differences were found in
`pharmacokinetics and intragastric pH results. (Also see Use in Women.)
`Renal Insufficiency
`In patients with severe renal insufficiency, plasma protein binding decreased by 1.0%-1.5% after
`administration of 60 mg of lansoprazole. Patients with renal insufficiency had a shortened elimination
`half-life and decreased total AUC (free and bound). AUC for free lansoprazole in plasma, however, was
`not related to the degree of renal impairment, and Cmax and Tmax were not different from subjects with
`healthy kidneys.
`Hepatic Insufficiency
`In patients with various degrees of chronic hepatic disease, the mean plasma half-life of the drug was
`prolonged from 1.5 hours to 3.2-7.2 hours. An increase in mean AUC of up to 500% was observed at
`
`
`Page 2 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 5 of 28
`
`steady state in hepatically-impaired patients compared to healthy subjects. Dose reduction in patients with
`severe hepatic disease should be considered.
`Race
`The pooled mean pharmacokinetic parameters of lansoprazole from twelve U.S. Phase 1 studies (N=513)
`were compared to the mean pharmacokinetic parameters from two Asian studies (N=20). The mean AUCs
`of lansoprazole in Asian subjects were approximately twice those seen in pooled U.S. data; however, the
`inter-individual variability was high. The Cmax values were comparable.
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`Mechanism of Action
`Lansoprazole belongs to a class of antisecretory compounds, the substituted benzimidazoles, that do not
`exhibit anticholinergic or histamine H2-receptor antagonist properties, but that suppress gastric acid
`secretion by specific inhibition of the (H+,K+)-ATPase enzyme system at the secretory surface of the
`gastric parietal cell. Because this enzyme system is regarded as the acid (proton) pump within the parietal
`cell, lansoprazole has been characterized as a gastric acid-pump inhibitor, in that it blocks the final step
`of acid production. This effect is dose-related and leads to inhibition of both basal and stimulated gastric
`acid secretion irrespective of the stimulus.
`
`Antisecretory Activity
`After oral administration, lansoprazole was shown to significantly decrease the basal acid output and
`significantly increase the mean gastric pH and percent of time the gastric pH was >3 and >4. Lansoprazole
`also significantly reduced meal-stimulated gastric acid output and secretion volume, as well as
`pentagastrin-stimulated acid output. In patients with hypersecretion of acid, lansoprazole significantly
`reduced basal and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Lansoprazole inhibited the normal
`increases in secretion volume, acidity and acid output induced by insulin.
`In a crossover study that included lansoprazole 15 and 30 mg for five days, the following effects
`on intragastric pH were noted:
`
`Mean Antisecretory Effects After Single and Multiple Daily Dosing
`PREVACID
`
`30 mg
`15 mg
`Baseline
`Day 1
`Day 5
`Day 1
`Day 5
`Value
`Parameter
`3.6*
`4.9*
`2.7+
`4.0+
`2.1
`Mean 24-Hour pH
`3.8*
`3.0+
`2.6
`2.4
`1.9
`Mean Nighttime pH
`51*
`72*
`33+
`59+
`18
`% Time Gastric pH>3
`41*
`66*
`22+
`49+
`12
`% Time Gastric pH>4
`NOTE: An intragastric pH of >4 reflects a reduction in gastric acid by 99%.
`*(p<0.05) versus baseline and lansoprazole 15 mg.
`+(p<0.05) versus baseline only.
`
`After the initial dose in this study, increased gastric pH was seen within 1-2 hours with lansoprazole 30 mg
`and 2-3 hours with lansoprazole 15 mg. After multiple daily dosing, increased gastric pH was seen within
`the first hour postdosing with lansoprazole 30 mg and within 1-2 hours postdosing with lansoprazole
`15 mg.
`
`
`Page 3 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 6 of 28
`
`Acid suppression may enhance the effect of antimicrobials in eradicating Helicobacter pylori
`(H. pylori). The percentage of time gastric pH was elevated above 5 and 6 was evaluated in a crossover
`study of PREVACID given q.d., b.i.d. and t.i.d.
`
`30 mg t.i.d.
`77*
`45*
`
`Mean Antisecretory Effects After 5 Days of b.i.d. and t.i.d. Dosing
`PREVACID
`15 mg b.i.d.
`30 mg b.i.d.
` 59+
`47
`23
`28
`
`30 mg q.d.
`Parameter
`43
`% Time Gastric pH>5
`20
`% Time Gastric pH>6
`+(p<0.05) versus PREVACID 30 mg q.d.
`*(p<0.05) versus PREVACID 30 mg q.d., 15 mg b.i.d. and 30 mg b.i.d.
`The inhibition of gastric acid secretion as measured by intragastric pH returns gradually to normal over two
`to four days after multiple doses. There is no indication of rebound gastric acidity.
`Enterochromaffin-like (ECL) Cell Effects
`During lifetime exposure of rats with up to 150 mg/kg/day of lansoprazole dosed seven days per week,
`marked hypergastrinemia was observed followed by ECL cell proliferation and formation of carcinoid
`tumors, especially in female rats. (See PRECAUTIONS, Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of
`Fertility.)
`Gastric biopsy specimens from the body of the stomach from approximately 150 patients treated
`continuously with lansoprazole for at least one year did not show evidence of ECL cell effects similar to
`those seen in rat studies. Longer term data are needed to rule out the possibility of an increased risk of the
`development of gastric tumors in patients receiving long-term therapy with lansoprazole.
`
`Other Gastric Effects in Humans
`Lansoprazole did not significantly affect mucosal blood flow in the fundus of the stomach. Due to the
`normal physiologic effect caused by the inhibition of gastric acid secretion, a decrease of about 17% in
`blood flow in the antrum, pylorus, and duodenal bulb was seen. Lansoprazole significantly slowed the
`gastric emptying of digestible solids. Lansoprazole increased serum pepsinogen levels and decreased
`pepsin activity under basal conditions and in response to meal stimulation or insulin injection. As with
`other agents that elevate intragastric pH, increases in gastric pH were associated with increases in nitrate-
`reducing bacteria and elevation of nitrite concentration in gastric juice in patients with gastric ulcer. No
`significant increase in nitrosamine concentrations was observed.
`
`Serum Gastrin Effects
`In over 2100 patients, median fasting serum gastrin levels increased 50% to 100% from baseline but
`remained within normal range after treatment with lansoprazole given orally in doses of 15 mg to 60 mg.
`These elevations reached a plateau within two months of therapy and returned to pretreatment levels within
`four weeks after discontinuation of therapy.
`
`Endrocrine Effects
`Human studies for up to one year have not detected any clinically significant effects on the endocrine
`system. Hormones studied include testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone
`(FSH), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), prolactin,
`cortisol, estradiol, insulin, aldosterone, parathormone, glucagon, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH),
`triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), and somatotropic hormone (STH). Lansoprazole in oral doses of 15
`
`
`Page 4 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 7 of 28
`
`to 60 mg for up to one year had no clinically significant effect on sexual function. In addition, lansoprazole
`in oral doses of 15 to 60 mg for two to eight weeks had no clinically significant effect on thyroid function.
`In 24-month carcinogenicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rats with daily dosages up to 150 mg/kg,
`proliferative changes in the Leydig cells of the testes, including benign neoplasm, were increased compared
`to control rates.
`
`Other Effects
`No systemic effects of lansoprazole on the central nervous system, lymphoid, hematopoietic, renal, hepatic,
`cardiovascular or respiratory systems have been found in humans. No visual toxicity was observed among
`56 patients who had extensive baseline eye evaluations, were treated with up to 180 mg/day of lansoprazole
`and were observed for up to 58 months. Other rat-specific findings after lifetime exposure included focal
`pancreatic atrophy, diffuse lymphoid hyperplasia in the thymus, and spontaneous retinal atrophy.
`
`Microbiology
`Lansoprazole, clarithromycin and/or amoxicillin have been shown to be active against most strains of
`Helicobacter pylori in vitro and in clinical infections as described in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`section.
`
`Heliobacter
`Helicobacter pylori
`Pretreatment Resistance
`Clarithromycin pretreatment resistance (≥ 2.0 µg/mL) was 9.5% (91/960) by E-test and 11.3% (12/106)
`by agar dilution in the dual and triple therapy clinical trials (M93-125, M93-130, M93-131, M95-392, and
`M95-399).
`Amoxicillin pretreatment susceptible isolates (≤ 0.25 µg/mL) occurred in 97.8% (936/957) and 98.0%
`(98/100) of the patients in the dual and triple therapy clinical trials by E-test and agar dilution, respectively.
`Twenty-one of 957 patients (2.2%) by E-test and 2 of 100 patients (2.0%) by agar dilution had amoxicillin
`pretreatment MICs of >0.25 µg/mL. One patient on the 14-day triple therapy regimen had an unconfirmed
`pretreatment amoxicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >256 µg/mL by E-test and the patient
`was eradicated of H. pylori.
`
`Clarithromycin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological Outcomesa
`Clarithromycin Pretreatment
`Clarithromycin Post-treatment
`Results
`Results
`H. pylori positive –
`not eradicated
`Post-treatment susceptibility results
`Ib
`Rb
`Sb
`No MIC
`Triple Therapy 14-Day (lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d./amoxicillin 1 gm b.i.d./clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.)
`(M95-399, M93-131, M95-392)
`Susceptibleb
`112
`Intermediateb
`3
`Resistantb
`17
`
`H. pylori negative –
`eradicated
`
`105
`3
`6
`
`7
`
`4
`
`7
`
`
`Page 5 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 8 of 28
`
`Triple Therapy 10-Day (lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d./amoxicillin 1 gm b.i.d./clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.)
`(M95-399)
`Susceptibleb
`Intermediateb
`Resistantb
`1
`4
`aIncludes only patients with pretreatment clarithromycin susceptibility test results
`bSusceptible (S) MIC ≤0.25 µg/mL, Intermediate (I) MIC 0.5 - 1.0 µg/mL, Resistant (R) MIC ≥2 µg/mL
`
`42
`
`40
`
`1
`
`1
`
`3
`
`Patients not eradicated of H. pylori following lansoprazole/amoxicillin/clarithromycin triple therapy will
`likely have clarithromycin resistant H. pylori. Therefore, for those patients who fail therapy, clarithromycin
`susceptibility testing should be done when possible. Patients with clarithromycin resistant H. pylori should
`not be treated with lansoprazole/amoxicillin/ clarithromycin triple therapy or with regimens which include
`clarithromycin as the sole antimicrobial agent.
`
`Amoxicillin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological Outcomes
`In the dual and triple therapy clinical trials, 82.6% (195/236) of the patients that had pretreatment
`amoxicillin susceptible MICs (≤ 0.25 µg/mL) were eradicated of H. pylori. Of those with pretreatment
`amoxicillin MICs of >0.25 µg/mL, three of six had the H. pylori eradicated. A total of 30% (21/70) of the
`patients failed lansoprazole 30 mg t.i.d./amoxicillin 1 gm t.i.d. dual therapy and a total of 12.8% (22/172)
`of the patients failed the 10- and 14-day triple therapy regimens. Post-treatment susceptibility results were
`not obtained on 11 of the patients who failed therapy. Nine of the 11 patients with amoxicillin post-
`treatment MICs that failed the triple therapy regimen also had clarithromycin resistant H. pylori isolates.
`
`Susceptibility Test for Helicobacter pylori
`The reference methodology for susceptibility testing of H. pylori is agar dilution MICs.1 One to three
`microliters of an inoculum equivalent to a No. 2 McFarland standard (1 x 107 – 1 x 108 CFU/mL for
`H. pylori) are inoculated directly onto freshly prepared antimicrobial-containing Mueller-Hinton agar plates
`with 5% aged defibrinated sheep blood (≥ 2 weeks old). The agar dilution plates are incubated at 35°C in
`a microaerobic environment produced by a gas generating system suitable for campylobacters. After 3 days
`of incubation, the MICs are recorded as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit
`growth of the organism. The clarithromycin and amoxicillin MIC values should be interpreted according
`to the following criteria:
`
`Interpretation
`Susceptible (S)
`Intermediate (I)
`Resistant (R)
`
`Clarithromycin MIC (µg/mL)a
`≤0.25
`0.5-1.0
`≥2.0
`Amoxicillin MIC (µg/mL)b
`Interpretation
`≤0.25
`Susceptible (S)
`a These are tentative breakpoints for the agar dilution methodology and they should not be used to interpret results
`obtained using alternative methods.
`b There were not enough organisms with MICs >0.25 µg/mL to determine a resistance breakpoint.
`
`
`Page 6 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 9 of 28
`
`Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control microorganisms to control
`the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures. Standard clarithromycin and amoxicillin powders should
`provide the following MIC values:
`MIC (µg/mL)a
`Antimicrobial Agent
`Microorganism
`0.015-0.12 µg/mL
`H. pylori ATCC 43504
`Clarithromycin
`0.015-0.12 µg/mL
`H. pylori ATCC 43504
`Amoxicillin
`a These are quality control ranges for the agar dilution methodology and they should not be used to control test results
`obtained using alternative methods.
`Reference
`1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Summary Minutes, Subcommittee on
`Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Tampa, FL, January 11-13, 1998.
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`Duodenal Ulcer
`In a U.S. multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response (15, 30, and 60 mg of PREVACID
`once daily) study of 284 patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, the percentage of
`patients healed after two and four weeks was significantly higher with all doses of PREVACID than with
`placebo. There was no evidence of a greater or earlier response with the two higher doses compared with
`PREVACID 15 mg. Based on this study and the second study described below, the recommended dose of
`PREVACID in duodenal ulcer is 15 mg per day.
`
`15 mg q.d.
`(N=68)
`Week
`42.4%*
`2
`89.4%*
`4
`* (p≤0.001) versus placebo.
`
`Duodenal Ulcer Healing Rates
`PREVACID
`30 mg q.d.
`(N=74)
`35.6%*
`91.7%*
`
`60 mg q.d.
`(N=70)
`39.1%*
`89.9%*
`
`Placebo
`
`(N=72)
`11.3%
`46.1%
`
`PREVACID 15 mg was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving day and nighttime abdominal
`pain and in decreasing the amount of antacid taken per day.
`In a second U.S. multicenter study, also double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison (15 and
`30 mg of PREVACID once daily), and including a comparison with ranitidine, in 280 patients with
`endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, the percentage of patients healed after four weeks was
`significantly higher with both doses of PREVACID than with placebo. There was no evidence of a greater
`or earlier response with the higher dose of PREVACID. Although the 15 mg dose of PREVACID was
`superior to ranitidine at 4 weeks, the lack of significant difference at 2 weeks and the absence of a
`difference between 30 mg of PREVACID and ranitidine leaves the comparative effectiveness of the two
`agents undetermined.
`
`
`Page 7 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 10 of 28
`
`Duodenal Ulcer Healing Rates
`PREVACID
`Ranitidine
`300 mg h.s.
`(N=82)
`30.5%
`70.5%*
`
`30 mg q.d.
`(N=77)
`44.2%
`80.3%*
`
`Dual therapy:
`
`Placebo
`
`(N=41)
`34.2%
`47.5%
`
`15 mg q.d.
`(N=80)
` Week
`35.0%
`2
`92.3%**
`4
`* (p≤0.05) versus placebo.
`** (p≤0.05) versus placebo and ranitidine.
`H. pylori Eradication to Reduce the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence
`Randomized, double-blind clinical studies performed in the U.S. in patients with H. pylori and duodenal
`ulcer disease (defined as an active ulcer or history of an ulcer within one year) evaluated the efficacy of
`PREVACID in combination with amoxicillin capsules and clarithromycin tablets as triple 14-day therapy
`or in combination with amoxicillin capsules as dual 14-day therapy for the eradication of H. pylori. Based
`on the results of these studies, the safety and efficacy of two different eradication regimens were
`established:
`Triple therapy:
`
`PREVACID 30 mg b.i.d./
`amoxicillin 1 gm b.i.d./
`clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.
`PREVACID 30 mg t.i.d./
`amoxicillin 1 gm t.i.d.
`All treatments were for 14 days. H. pylori eradication was defined as two negative tests (culture and
`histology) at 4-6 weeks following the end of treatment.
`Triple therapy was shown to be more effective than all possible dual therapy combinations. Dual
`therapy was shown to be more effective than both monotherapies. Eradication of H. pylori has been shown
`to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence.
`A randomized, double-blind clinical study performed in the U.S. in patients with H. pylori and
`duodenal ulcer disease (defined as an active ulcer or history of an ulcer within one year) compared the
`efficacy of PREVACID triple therapy for 10 and 14 days. This study established that the 10-day triple
`therapy was equivalent to the 14-day triple therapy in eradicating H. pylori.
`
`
`Page 8 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 11 of 28
`
`H pylori Eradication Rates – Triple Therapy
`(PREVACID/amoxicillin/clarithromycin)
`Percent of Patients Cured
`[95% Confidence Interval]
`(Number of patients)
`
`Study
`M93-131
`
`Duration
`14 days
`
`Triple Therapy
`Triple Therapy
`Intent-to-Treat Analysis#
`Evaluable Analysis*
`86†
`92†
`[73.3-93.5]
`[80.0-97.7]
`(N=55)
`(N=48)
`83‡
`86‡
`[72.0-90.8]
`[75.7-93.6]
`(N=70)
`(N=66)
`82
`85
`[73.9-88.1]
`[77.0-91.0]
`(N=126)
`(N=113)
`81
`84
`[73.9-87.6]
`[76.0-89.8]
`(N=135)
`(N=123)
`* Based on evaluable patients with confirmed duodenal ulcer (active or within one year) and H. pylori infection at
`baseline defined as at least two of three positive endoscopic tests from CLOtest®, histology and/or culture. Patients
`were included in the analysis if they completed the study. Additionally, if patients dropped out of the study due
`to an adverse event related to the study drug, they were included in the evaluable analysis as failures of therapy.
`# Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented H. pylori infection at baseline as defined above and
`had a confirmed duodenal ulcer (active or within one year). All dropouts were included as failures of therapy.
`† (p<0.05) versus PREVACID/amoxicillin and PREVACID/clarithromycin dual therapy
`‡ (p<0.05) versus clarithromycin/amoxicillin dual therapy
`+ The 95% confidence interval for the difference in eradication rates, 10-day minus 14-day is (-10.5, 8.1) in the
`evaluable analysis and (-9.7, 9.1) in the intent-to-treat analysis.
`
`M95-392
`
`14 days
`
`M95-399+
`
`14 days
`
`10 days
`
`H. pylori Eradication Rates – 14-Day Dual Therapy
`(PREVACID/amoxicillin)
`Percent of Patients Cured
`[95% Confidence Interval]
`(Number of patients)
`Dual Therapy
`Evaluable Analysis*
`
`Dual Therapy
`Intent-to-Treat Analysis#
`
`77†
`[62.5-87.2]
`(N=51)
`66‡
`[51.9-77.5]
`(N=58)
`
`70†
`[56.8-81.2]
`(N=60)
`61‡
`[48.5-72.9]
`(N=67)
`
`Study
`
`M93-131
`
`M93-125
`
`
`Page 9 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 12 of 28
`
`* Based on evaluable patients with confirmed duodenal ulcer (active or within one year) and H. pylori infection at
`baseline defined as at least two of three positive endoscopic tests from CLOtest®, histology and/or culture. Patients
`were included in the analysis if they completed the study. Additionally, if patients dropped out of the study due to
`an adverse event related to the study drug, they were included in the analysis as failures of therapy.
`# Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented H. pylori infection at baseline as defined above and
`had a confirmed duodenal ulcer (active or within one year). All dropouts were included as failures of therapy.
`† (p<0.05) versus PREVACID alone.
`‡ (p<0.05) versus PREVACID alone or amoxicillin alone.
`
`Long-Term Maintenance Treatment of Duodenal Ulcers
`PREVACID has been shown to prevent the recurrence of duodenal ulcers. Two independent, double-blind,
`multicenter, controlled trials were conducted in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed duodenal
`ulcers. Patients remained healed significantly longer and the number of recurrences of duodenal ulcers was
`significantly less in patients treated with PREVACID than in patients treated with placebo over a 12-month
`period.
`
`#2
`
`Endoscopic Remission Rates
`Percent in Endoscopic Remission
`0-3 mo.
`0-6 mo.
`0-12 mo.
`90%*
`87%*
`84%*
`49%
`41%
`39%
`94%*
`94%*
`85%*
`87%*
`79%*
`70%*
`33%
`0%
`0%
`
`No. of Pts.
`86
`83
`18
`15
`15
`
`Trial Drug
`PREVACID 15 mg q.d.
`#1
`Placebo
`PREVACID 30 mg q.d.
`PREVACID 15 mg q.d.
`Placebo
`%=Life Table Estimate
`* (p≤0.001) versus placebo.
`In trial #2, no significant difference was noted between PREVACID 15 mg and 30 mg in maintaining
`remission.
`Gastric Ulcer
`In a U.S. multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 253 patients with endoscopically
`documented gastric ulcer, the percentage of patients healed at four and eight weeks was significantly higher
`with PREVACID 15 mg and 30 mg once a day than with placebo.
`
`Gastric Ulcer Healing Rates
`PREVACID
`30 mg q.d.
`(N=63)
`58.1%*
`96.8%*
`
`60 mg q.d.
`(N=61)
`53.3%*
`93.2%*
`
`15 mg q.d.
`(N=65)
`Week
`64.6%*
`4
`92.2%*
`8
`* (p≤0.05) versus placebo.
`Patients treated with any PREVACID dose reported significantly less day and night abdominal pain along
`with fewer days of antacid use and fewer antacid tablets used per day than the placebo group.
`
`Placebo
`
`(N=64)
`37.5%
`76.7%
`
`
`Page 10 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 13 of 28
`
`Independent substantiation of the effectiveness of PREVACID 30 mg was provided by a meta-analysis
`of published and unpublished data.
`
`Healing of NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer
`In two U.S. and Canadian multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled studies in patients with
`endoscopically confirmed NSAID-associated gastric ulcer who continued their NSAID use, the percentage
`of patients healed after 8 weeks was statistically significantly higher with 30 mg of PREVACID than with
`the active control. A total of 711 patients were enrolled in the study, and 701 patients were treated.
`Patients ranged in age from 18 to 88 years (median age 59 years), with 67% of female patients and 33%
`male patients. Race was distributed as follows: 87% Caucasian, 8% Black, 5% other. There was no
`statistically significant difference between PREVACID 30 mg q.d. and the active control on symptom relief
`(i.e., abdominal pain).
`
`Week 4
`Week 8
`
`Active Control2
`
`28% (23/83)
`55% (41/74)
`
`NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer Healing Rates 1
`Study #1
`PREVACID
`30 mg q.d
`60% (53/88) 3
`79% (62/79) 3
`Study #2
`PREVACID
`30 mg q.d.
`53% (40/75)
`Week 4
`77% (47/61) 3
`Week 8
`1Actual observed ulcer(s) healed at time points + 2 days
`2 Dose for healing of gastric ulcer.
`3(p≤0.05) versus active control
`
`Active Control2
`
`38% (31/82)
`50% (33/66)
`
`Risk Reduction of NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer
`In one large U.S., multicenter, double-blind, placebo- and misoprostol-controlled (misoprostol blinded only
`to the endoscopist) study in patients who required chronic use of an NSAID and who had a history of an
`endoscopically documented gastric ulcer, the proportion of patients remaining free from gastric ulcer at
`4, 8, and 12 weeks was significantly higher with 15 or 30 mg of PREVACID than placebo. A total of 537
`patients were enrolled in the study, and 535 patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 23 to 89
`years (median age 60 years), with 65% female patients and 35% male patients. Race was distributed as
`follows: 90% Caucasian, 6 % Black, 4% other. The 30 mg dose of PREVACID demonstrated no
`additional benefit in risk reduction of the NSAID-associated gastric ulcer than the 15 mg dose.
`
`
`Page 11 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 14 of 28
`
`Placebo
`
`NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer Risk Reduction Rates
`% of Patients Remaining Gastric Ulcer-Free1
`PREVACID PREVACID Misoprostol
`200 µg q.i.d.
`15 mg q.d.
`30 mg q.d.
`(N=121)
`(N=116)
`(N=106)
`Week
`90%
`92%
`96%
`4
`86%
`88%
`95%
`8
`80%
`82%
`93%
`12
`1 % = Life Table Estimate
`(p<0.001) PREVACID 15 mg q.d. versus placebo; PREVACID 30 mg q.d. versus placebo; and
`misoprostol 200 µg q.i.d. versus placebo.
`(p<0.05) Misoprostol 200 µg q.i.d. versus PREVACID 15 mg q.d; and Misoprostol 200 µg q.i.d. versus
`PREVACID 30 mg q.d.
`
`(N=112)
`66%
`60%
`51%
`
`Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
`Symptomatic GERD
`In a U.S. multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 214 patients with frequent GERD
`symptoms, but no esophageal erosions by endoscopy, significantly greater relief of heartburn associated
`with GERD was observed with the administration of lansoprazole 15 mg once daily up to 8 weeks than
`with placebo. No significant additional benefit from lansoprazole 30 mg once daily was observed.
`The intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated significant reduction in frequency and severity of day and
`night heartburn. Data for frequency and severity for the 8-week treatment period were as follows:
`
`Variable
`
`% of Days without Heartburn
`Week 1
`Week 4
`Week 8
`% of Nights without Heartburn
`Week 1
`Week 4
`Week 8
`* (p<0.01) versus placebo.
`
`Frequency of Heartburn
`Placebo
`PREVACID 15 mg
`(n=43)
`(n=80)
`Median
`
`PREVACID 30 mg
`(n=86)
`
`0%
`11%
`13%
`
`17%
`25%
`36%
`
`71%*
`81%*
`84%*
`
`86%*
`89%*
`92%*
`
`46%*
`76%*
`82%*
`
`57%*
`73%*
`80%*
`
`
`Page 12 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 15 of 28
`
`In two U.S., multi-center double-blind, ranitidine-controlled studies of 925 total patients with frequent
`GERD symptoms, but no esophageal erosions by endoscopy, lansoprazole 15 mg was superior to ranitidine
`150 mg (b.i.d.) in decreasing the frequency and severity of day and night heartburn associated with GERD
`for the 8-week treatment period. No significant additional benefit from lansoprazole 30 mg once daily was
`observed.
`
`Erosive Esophagitis
`In a U.S. multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 269 patients entering with an endoscopic
`diagnosis of esophagitis with mucosal grading of 2 or more and grades 3 and 4 signifying erosive disease,
`the percentages of patients with healing were as follows:
`
`
`Page 13 of 25
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005
`CFAD v. Pozen
`IPR2015-01718
`
`

`
`NDA 20-406/S-038
`Prevacid (lansoprazole) Delayed-Release Capsules Package Insert Text
`Page 16 of 28
`
`Erosive Esophagitis Healing Rates
`PREVACID
`30 mg q.d.
`(N=65)
`81.3%**
`95.4%*
`95.4%*
`
`60 mg q.d.
`(N=72)
`80.6%**
`94.3%*
`94.4%*
`
`15 mg q.d.
`(N=69)
`Week
`67.6%*
`4
`87.7%*
`6
`90.9%*
`8
` * (p≤0.001) versus placebo.
`** (p≤0.05) versus PREVACID 15 mg and placebo.
`
`Placebo
`
`(N=63)
`32.8%
`52.5%
`52.5%
`
`In this study, all PREVACID groups reported significantly greater relief of heartburn and less day and night
`abdominal pain along with fewer days of antacid use and fewer antacid tablets taken per day than the
`placebo group.
`Although all doses were effective, the earlier healing in the higher two doses suggests 30 mg q.d. as
`the recommended dose.
`PREVACID was also compared in a U.S. multicenter, double-blind study

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket