throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 37
`
`
`Entered: November 4, 2016
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS VII, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POZEN INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01718
`Patent 8,945,621 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER, LORA M. GREEN, and
`JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Request for Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
` A
`
` trial in this proceeding was instituted on February 22, 2016. Paper 17. A
`
`Scheduling Order entered on the same date set the oral hearing for November 16,
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01718
`Patent 8,945,621 B2
`
`2016, if requested by the parties and granted by the Board. Paper 18. Patent
`
`Owner and Petitioner each requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a).
`
`Papers 35, 36. The parties’ requests are granted according to the terms set forth
`
`below.
`
`An oral argument for IPR2015-01718 will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern
`
`Time, on November 16, 2016, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600
`
`Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`Each party will have 45 minutes to present arguments. Petitioner bears the
`
`ultimate burden of persuasion that the claims at issue in this review are
`
`unpatentable. Petitioner will, therefore, open the hearing by presenting its case
`
`regarding the challenged claims for which the Board instituted trial. Patent Owner
`
`then will have the opportunity to respond to Petitioner’s arguments. Petitioner may
`
`use any time it has reserved for rebuttal to respond to arguments presented by
`
`Patent Owner. Patent Owner may not reserve rebuttal time.
`
`The oral hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance. In-
`
`person attendance will be accommodated on a first come first served basis.
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s
`
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), any demonstrative exhibits must be served on
`
`opposing counsel at least seven (7) business days before the hearing. The parties
`
`are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents
`
`of the University of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper
`
`65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. The
`
`Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith to resolve any
`
`objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if any such objections cannot be resolved,
`
`the parties must file any objections to the demonstratives with the Board at least
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01718
`Patent 8,945,621 B2
`
`two business days before the hearing. The objections should identify with
`
`particularity which portions of the demonstratives are subject to objection, include
`
`a copy of the objected-to portions, and include a short, one-sentence statement of
`
`the reason for each objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted.
`
`Any objection that is not timely presented will be considered waived. We note that
`
`demonstrative exhibits are only an aid to oral argument, and are not evidence of
`
`record in the proceedings.
`
`The parties also shall provide the demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least
`
`two (2) business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`Despite the requirement in 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b) for parties to file demonstratives,
`
`the parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in these cases without prior
`
`authorization from the Board. A hard copy of the demonstratives should be
`
`provided to the court reporter at the hearing.
`
`The parties are reminded that, during the hearing, the presenter must identify
`
`clearly each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by referencing a specific slide or screen
`
`number) to ensure clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the oral
`
`hearing. Lead or backup counsel, however, may present the party’s argument. If
`
`either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be attending the hearing, that
`
`party should initiate a joint telephone conference with the other party and the panel
`
`no later than two (2) business days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov at least four (4) business days in advance of the hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01718
`Patent 8,945,621 B2
`
`
`It is
`
`
`
`ORDERED that oral argument will commence at 1:00 PM ET, on November
`
`16, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01718
`Patent 8,945,621 B2
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jerry Harris, Jr.
`Amy LaValle
`CFAD.IPRs@wickphillips.com
`
`Rodney B. Carroll
`rcarroll@dfw.conleyrose.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01718
`Patent 8,945,621 B2
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Margaret Sampson, Ph.D.
`margaret.sampson@bakerbotts.com
`
`Jeffrey S. Gritton
`jeff.gritton@bakerbotts.com
`
`Dennis Bennett
`dennisbennett@globalpatentgroup.com
`
`Matthew Phillips
`matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com
`
`Thomas Blinka
`zIPR2015-01718@cooley.com
`
`Stephen M. Hash, Ph.D.
`PozenVimovoBB@BakerBotts.com
`
`Ricardo Rodriguez
`zIPR2015-01718@cooley.com
`
`Lauren Stevens
`lstevens@horizonpharma.com
`Kevin Laurence
`kevin.laurence@renaissanceiplaw.com
`
`James Monroe
`james.monroe@finnegan.com
`
`Danielle Pfifferling
`danielle.pfifferling@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket