`
`By: Naveen Modi (Google_LG-CoreWireless-IPR@paulhastings.com)
`
`Joseph E. Palys (Google_LG-CoreWireless-IPR@paulhastings.com)
`
`Daniel Zeilberger (Google_LG-CoreWireless-IPR@paulhastings.com)
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE INC.,
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CORE WIRELESS LICENSING S.A.R.L.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01714
`Patent 7,072,667
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`PATENT OWNER’S EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioner submits the following
`
`Case IPR2015-01714
`Patent No. 7,072,667
`
`
`
`objections to certain exhibits served by Patent Owner in Case No. IPR2015-01714.
`
`Petitioner’s objections apply equally to Patent Owner’s reliance on these exhibits
`
`in any subsequently-filed documents. These objections are timely, having been
`
`served within five business days of service of the evidence to which the objection
`
`is directed.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2002 under Rules 401-403 of the Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence as Exhibit 2002 contains testimony unrelated to the grounds of
`
`rejection on which the Board instituted inter partes review. See, e.g., Ex. 2002 at
`
`¶¶ 52-56, 72-88 (providing testimony relating to Staack). Petitioner further objects
`
`to Exhibit 2002 under Rule 802 of the Federal Rules of Evidence because certain
`
`paragraphs rely on documents that constitute hearsay. See, e.g., Ex. 2002 at ¶¶ 75,
`
`80-84.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 20, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Naveen Modi/
`Naveen Modi
`Reg. No. 46,224
`
`Counsel for Google Inc. and
`LG Electronics, Inc.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2015-01714
`Patent No. 7,072,667
`
`I hereby certify that on this 20th day of May 2016, a copy of the foregoing
`
`Petitioner’s Objections to Patent Owner’s Exhibits was served by electronic mail
`
`upon the following:
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`333 W San Carlos St., Suite 200
`San Jose, CA 95110
`patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
` /Naveen Modi/
`Naveen Modi
`Reg. No. 46,224
`
`Counsel for Google Inc. and
`LG Electronics, Inc.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2016