throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:14-cv-678-RWS
`LEAD CASE
`
`
`Case No. 6:14-cv-680-RWS
`Consolidated case
`
`
`TracBeam, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`T-Mobile US, Inc., and
`T-Mobile USA, Inc.,
`
`
`
`TracBeam, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam’s Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`Infringement Contentions under Patent Rule 3-1(g) as to T-Mobile
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1018
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`1
`
`

`

`Exh. 1
`U.S. Patent No. 7,298,327
`
`
`This chart is derived from Exhibit D to TracBeam’s P.R. 3-1(g) contentions served April 3,
`2015. Claims that are no longer asserted from this patent are not included in this chart. The
`additional detail and citations provided in this chart are expressly identified below (under the
`heading “Supplement 7/1/2016.” As stated in the cover document, the below contentions do not
`constitute the expert opinions of TracBeam’s experts and may be broader in scope than the
`opinions of TracBeam’s experts that will be disclosed in expert reports. Furthermore, these
`contentions are specific to the T-Mobile accused instrumentality and its design and operation and
`cannot necessarily be applied more broadly to other systems or methods that make use of similar
`technologies or location determining methods. All cites to code files, documents, or other
`evidence in support of the contentions disclosed below is exemplary and non-exhaustive.
`Additional supporting evidence will be relied upon by TracBeam and its experts in their expert
`reports and at trial.1
`
`
`
`Claim 1 elements
`
`T-Mobile’s accused method2
`
`[pre] A method for locating
`communication devices in
`communication with a
`communications network having a
`plurality of geographically
`dispersed network communication
`components operably connected
`together for communicating with
`the communication devices,
`comprising:
`
`
`
`T-Mobile performs (or, alternatively, controls or directs the
`
`performance of) a method of locating wireless mobile stations by
`
`providing, operating, using, controlling, and directing T-Mobile’s and/or
`
`the legacy MetroPCS network’s e911 and commercial location based
`
`platform and services and the processes performed by T-Mobile and/or its
`
`vendors in connection with the provision of e911 and commercial location
`
`based services on or for the T-Mobile and/or legacy MetroPCS networks
`
`(including 2G, 3G, and 4G/LTE) and T-Mobile and/or the legacy Metro
`
`PCS wireless subscribers (and subscribers roaming on a T-Mobile or
`
`legacy Metro PCS network during a location session).
`
`
`
`The “communication devices” limitation is met by the cell phones,
`
`smartphones, tablets, notebooks, and other portable communication
`
`2 For each of the asserted claims in the ‘327 patent, T-Mobile’s accused method includes the methods
`used by T-Mobile to locate mobile devices on the legacy MetroPCS network.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1018
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`2
`
`

`

`not alter the accuracy of each underlying location estimation method. At
`best, the PSAP can be presented with the most accurate estimate the
`carrier was able to make from among its various technologies or
`approaches for each 911 call—but the time to determine which estimate is
`likely the most accurate will be governed by the slowest time-to-first-fix,
`while attempting to return a result within 30 seconds.”
`TB-TM-00000356.
`
`“To address this, and because all Phase II location technologies involve
`trade-offs between accuracy, yield, and latency (including U-TDOA and
`carrier fallback technologies like RTT), T-Mobile and other carriers
`provide call-by-call uncertainty estimates to those PSAPs that want the
`information. These uncertainty estimates can provide PSAPs with what is
`functionally the most helpful information—an estimate of how large an
`area around the location estimate must be included for the carrier to be
`confident to a specified level (90 percent for T-Mobile) that the caller is
`located within that area. While uncertainty is not the same as accuracy, it
`does indicate to the PSAP the likely search radius. This addresses the
`issue of variability in location estimates—which occurs within a
`technology as well as across technologies—in the most targeted manner,
`through the provision of relevant information.” TB-TM-00000340.
`
`Supplement 7/1/2016
`
`See above supplement.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 60 elements
`
`T-Mobile’s accused method
`
`A method for locating
`communication devices, wherein
`each one of a plurality of location
`determiners is used for
`determining corresponding
`geographic location information
`for each of various ones of the
`communication devices, and
`wherein for at least one actual
`geographic location (L) of at least
`one of the communication devices
`(CD), at least a first and a second
`of the location determiners
`
`
`
`T-Mobile performs (or, alternatively, controls or directs the
`
`performance of) a method of locating wireless mobile stations by providing,
`
`operating, using, controlling, and directing T-Mobile’s and/or the legacy
`
`MetroPCS network’s e911 and commercial location based platform and
`
`services and the processes performed by T-Mobile and/or its vendors in
`
`connection with the provision of e911 and commercial location based
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1018
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`3
`
`

`

`Claim 60 elements
`
`T-Mobile’s accused method
`
`determine different corresponding
`geographic location information
`for locating the communication
`device CD, comprising:
`
`services on or for the T-Mobile and/or legacy MetroPCS networks
`
`(including 2G, 3G, and 4G/LTE) and T-Mobile and/or the legacy Metro PCS
`
`wireless subscribers (and subscribers roaming on a T-Mobile or legacy Metro
`
`PCS network during a location session).
`
`
`
`Depending on the Court’s claim construction, the “location
`
`determiners” limitation is met by processes and/or sub-processes performed
`
`by the mobile stations (identified above), the network base stations, T-
`
`Mobile and/or legacy MetroPCS servers, and/or vendor servers that
`
`determine or provide location estimates, determine or provide information
`
`used to make location estimates, and/or the hardware or software
`
`components that perform or execute such processes and/or sub-processes.
`
`The components include, but are not limited to:
`
` Device components including GPS chipsets, core processor, system
`
`on chip (SOCs), WiFi chipset or radio circuit, and baseband processor
`
`or chipset;
`
` Network components including the base station; base transceiver
`
`station; base station controller; node B; Radio Network Controller
`
`(RNC); location measuring unit (LMU); serving mobile location
`
`center (SMLC); mobile switching center (MSC); Gateway Mobile
`
`Location Center (GMLC); Mobile Positioning Center (MPC);
`
`position determining entity (PDE); aGPS or GLONASS servers,
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1018
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`4
`
`

`

`Claim 60 elements
`
`T-Mobile’s accused method
`
`databases, and reference networks; SUPL servers or SLP; and Cell-ID
`
`(and enhanced cell ID) servers and databases.”
`
`For “communication devices,” see claim 1(preamble).
`
`Depending on the Court’s claim constructions, the limitation
`
`
`
`
`
`“geographical location information” is met by
`
` GPS signals, GPS ephemeris data, A-GPS assistance data,
`
`GLONASS signals, GLONASS ephemeris data, A-GLONASS
`
`assistance data, latitude, longitude, and altitude information and
`
`estimates, GPS and A-GPS estimates, and GLONASS and A-
`
`GLONASS estimates;
`
` WiFi access point signals, Wi-Fi hotspot information or location
`
`models,
`
` cell tower signals or other cell tower information or location models,
`
`
`
`location estimates created by Round Trip Time (RTT), A-GPS/RTT
`
`hybrid, TDOA, U-TDOA, OTDOA, Cell ID, Enhanced Cell-ID, Cell-
`
`ID Timing Advance, WiFi, and indoor location techniques, and at
`
`least in the case of legacy MetroPCS, AFLT and hybrid AFLT signals
`
`and measurements, and
`
` measurements based on or used to determine any, all, or a
`
`combination of the items identified above;
`
` estimates as to the accuracy, confidence, or reliability of such
`
`location information or estimate or of the location technology or
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1018
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`5
`
`

`

`Claim 60 elements
`
`T-Mobile’s accused method
`
`estimating source (including filtering, outlier, and/or sanity check
`
`related data);
`
` data relating to time, such as a time stamp, time delay data, time of
`
`transmission data, time of arrival data, and other time-related data;
`
` directions;
`
` geographical identifications (such as streets, roads, landmarks);
`
`and/or
`
` names of places (e.g. names of streets, restaurants, etc.).
`
`
`
`The phrase “first and a second of the location determiners” refers to
`
`two different instances of location determiners.
`
`
`
`To the extent the foregoing structures or acts do not literally meet the
`
`claim requirements, they do so under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`
`
`TracBeam reserves the right to supplement or amend its contentions
`
`based on (1) discovery that has not yet been received in this case, including
`
`source code. P.R. 3-1(g) and/or (2) claim constructions rulings from the
`
`Court and/or Defendants’ disclosure of claim constructions positions or non-
`
`infringement contentions.
`
`
`
`Sample evidence.
`
`“T-Mobile is proud of the high Phase II yield and high accuracy made
`available to PSAPs by this robust combination of positioning methods. For
`all 911 calls over 30 seconds, including outdoor and indoor locations (from
`wherever the actual 911 calls are originating), our national UMTS yield for
`the initial A-GPS attempt is over 77 percent—up from 74 percent a year ago.
`Thus, not only is AGPS yield high, but is actually increasing over time as a
`result of both handset and network improvements, despite the possible
`increase in wireless 911 calls originating from indoors. Of the remaining 911
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1018
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket