throbber
t ‘) c/
`
`U.S. Department
`of Tronsportatron
`Federal
`Aviation
`Administration
`
`Advisory
`Circular
`
`Subject: AIRG33EzMINESS APPROVALOF
`
`OMJSG&/VLJ? NAVSWION SYSTEMS IFOR USE
`IN THE U.S. NATIONAL AIRSPACE
`sYsm MASS AND ALASKA
`
`IMe: g/12/88
`lnitiated
`by: xR-12()
`
`AC NO: 20-1()1c
`Change:
`
`but not
`1 PURPOSE. This advisory circular establishes an acceptable ws,
`tie only means, of obtaining airworthiness approval of an mga/Very mw
`Frequency (VLF) navigation system for use under VFR (visual
`flight
`rules) and
`IFR (instrument
`flight
`rules) within
`the conterminous United States, Alaska, and
`surrounding United States waters. Like all advisory material,
`this advisory
`circular
`is not,
`in itself, mndatory and does not constitute a regulation.
`It
`is issued for guidance purposes and to outline one method of compliance with
`aimrthiness
`requirements. As such, the terms "shall" and "must1 used in this
`advisory circular pertain
`to an applicant who chooses to follow
`the method
`presented. The guidelines provided in this advisory circular supersede those of
`AC 90045A, Approval of Area Navigation Systems for Use in the U.S.:National
`2.
`Airspace System, for ma/VLF
`navigation equipt.
`
`2 CANCELLATION. Advisory Circular
`(AC) 200lOlB, dated December 1, 1980, is
`canceled.
`RELATEDFAR. Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 43,
`3
`91 0
`and
`4 0 RELATEDREADINGMA!TERIALS,
`(FAA)/Technical Standard Order (TSO)
`a. Federal Aviation Administration
`C94a, Qnega Receiving Equipment Qxrating Within the Radio Frequency Range 10.2
`to 13.6 Kilohertz, and TSO C120, Airborne Area Navigation Equipment Using
`ma/VLF
`Inputs. Copies nay be obtained from the Deparmt
`of Transportation,
`FAA, Aircraft Certification
`Service, Aircraft Engineering Division
`(AIR-1201,
`800 Independence Avenue, SW., mshington, DC 20591.
`b Radio Technical Cammission for Aeronautics (RICA), Document No.
`E?TCA&6OB, Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne
`Quipment,
`lBcument No. RX@&164A, Airborne &ga Receiving Equipnt,
`bcu.ment No. RTCA/DO-178A, Software Considerations
`in Airborne Systems and
`EQuipnt Certification,
`and writ
`No. RICA/DO-190, Minimum Operational
`Performance Standards for Airborne Area Navigation Equipment using Omega/vr;F
`Inputs. Ccpies may be purchased from RTCA Secretariat, One McPherson Square,
`Suite 500, 1425 K Street, WV., Wshington, DC 20005.
`c. Advisory Circular 90-82, Random Area Navigation Routes. Copies may be
`fromthe Department of Transportation, Utilization
`obtained
`and Storage Section,
`M-443.2, Washington, DC 20590.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 1
`
`

`
`AC 204OlC
`
`g/12/88
`
`of Normal Category Rotorcraft.
`d. Advisory Circular 27-1, Certification
`This documnt should be referenced to determine if considerations beyond those
`contained in this advisory circular are necessary when installing
`an W/W
`If necessary, AC 27-1 will
`navigation system in a nom1 category rotorcraft.
`address those item peculiar
`to rotorcraft
`installations.
`Copies my be ordered
`from: Superintendent of mcuments, U.S. Govermt
`Printing Off-ice, FJashington,
`DC 20402, or from any of the Government Printing Office bookstores located in
`Identify
`the publication as AC 27-1,
`major cities
`throughout the United States,
`Certification
`of Norm1 Category Rotorcraft, Stock Number 050-007-00708-6.
`
`of Transport Category Rotorcraft.
`e. Advisory Circular 29-2, Certification
`This document should be referenced to determine if considerations beyond those
`contained in this advisory circular are necessary when installing
`an Omega/VL,F
`navigation system in a transport category rotorcraft.
`If necessary, AC 29-2
`will address those it-
`peculiar
`to rotorcraft
`installations.
`
`'
`
`5.BxKGR0UND.
`a. System Description: Omega is a radio navigation system which uses low
`frequency, precisely
`timed pulsed signals from eight round transmitting
`stations
`sL&ed thou&r& of miles apart around the mrld.
`The VW commications
`system
`is comprised of a series of high power very low frequency transmitters
`comprising the U.S. Naval VLF Telecmmn ications Network. Omega stitions
`transmit
`in a very precise phase stable format and are synchronized with each
`hover,
`other using atomic clocks. The VW signals are transmitted similarly,
`are not synchronized with each other as with Vega signals. Position data is
`derived by measuring the phase changes of signals being received. The system
`solves the continuously changing georrretry problem and converts the phase changes
`being measured fram several stations
`into distance and direction of rrw>vement
`since the last phase meilsurmts were taken. The increTllenta1 changes in
`distance and direction are continuously combined with previously calculated
`Navigation values such as distance
`positions
`to determine the present position.
`and bearing to a waypoint are computed from the aircraft
`latitude/longitude
`and
`the location of the waypoint. Course guidance is generally provided as a linear
`deviation
`from the desired track of a great circle course. The desired course
`my be pilot selectable or my be determined by the navigation computer by
`cqutations
`based on the locations of succesive waypoints.
`b . System Availability
`and Reliability.
`the purpose of
`for
`(1) The Ortega station netmrk was created solely
`itiomtion
`long-range navigation. &ega system status
`is available
`providing
`on a telephone recording fram U.S. Naval Observatory,
`telephone (703) 866-3801.
`-a
`status -sages
`are also broadcast by the Esational Bureau of Standards on
`stations WWV and WWH at 16 minutes wt
`each hour (WWV) and 47 minutes past
`each hour MWVEiL
`system
`the VW -ications
`(2) Unlike the ddicated Cxrrega netmrk,
`intended for navigation use. The
`operated by the U.S. Navy is hot primarily
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 2
`
`

`
`g/12/88
`
`AC 20401C
`
`change frequencies, etc., with no
`mvy my shut stations down, add new stations,
`Information on current W system status
`is not published for
`advancewarning.
`the aviation user.
`(3) The Omga/VLF navigation system, while it my use VLF mmmmications
`stations
`to supplmt
`and enhance the ma
`system (increase'areas of coverage,
`irrprove performance, etc.),
`should be capable of accurate navigation using Wga
`signals alone.
`The accuracy of Omega/VLF navigation can 'be
`c. Omega Position Errors.
`degraded by errors due to phase disturbances of the signals as they propagate
`from the station
`to the aircraft,
`improper mdeling of the signal propagation
`changes caused by diurnal shift, errors due to poor station/aircraft
`geometry,
`surface conductivity,
`etc.
`d. General Operational Limitations.
`(1) En Route National Airspace System (NAS) Use. An Qmqa/VLF system
`my be approved for en route navigation VFR or IFR within
`the conterminous
`United States and Alaska. Other navigation equipnt
`(i.e., Very High Frequency
`Range (WR), distance measuring equipmnt
`(IIMEjf tactical air navigation
`(Tm))
`appropriate
`to the ground facilities
`along the intended route to be
`flown shouldbe
`installedandoperable.
`(2) Terminal and Approach Use in the NAS. An ma/VW
`be approved for terminal and approach operations.
`(3) IFR kvigation EQuipment. Aircraft
`employing Qrqa/VLF for
`navigation should also be equipped with an approved alternate means of
`navigation.
`6 . DEFINITIONS.
`a. En mute Operations. En route operations are those flight phases con-
`ducted on charted WR routes designated as high or low altitude
`routes
`(Jet or
`Victor),
`direct point-to-point
`operations between defined waypoints, or along
`great circle
`routes as descriw
`in AC 90-82.
`is electromagnetic noise gen-
`b, Precipitation Static
`(P-Static).
`P-static
`erated by the dissipation of an electrical
`charge from an aircraft
`into the
`The aircraft
`becorcles charged by flight
`through particles
`suspended
`atmsphere.
`in the atmsphere such as dust,
`ice, rain, or sno&. Unprotected aircraft my
`create so much noise that
`the Qqa/VLF
`receiver can no longer detect the
`transmitted signal.
`c. Synchronization. Synchronization
`is the process of determining which
`Qnega station
`transmits which segmnt of the Qxga format at a specific
`tim.
`AIRKMIXINESS ~NSIDERATIONS. Orrega/VLF navigation system have been certi-
`7
`ficated
`for VFR and IFR use as an area navigation system for en route navigation
`for Omga/VLF -
`in the NAS. This paragraph establishes acceptable criteria
`system,
`
`.system my not
`
`IFR
`
`Par. 5
`
`3
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 3
`
`

`
`I
`
`I
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 4
`
`

`
`g/12/88
`
`AC 200101C
`
`in terms of latitude
`
`and longitude
`
`to
`
`to
`
`to
`
`(1)
`
`at least
`
`utilization
`
`position
`
`Flightcrew
`of:
`Inputs
`--
`m.------ - - - - -
`(i) Aircraft present position
`the nearest 0.1 minute.
`to-to
`(for
`or four
`to-from equip&)
`least
`three (for
`(ii) At
`equipment) mypoint positions
`in ternrrs of latitude and longitude to at least the
`nearest 0.3, minute.
`(iii) A means to confirm correctness of input data prior
`of the new data by the system.
`(iv) A "direct
`to" function
`to define a route segment from present
`to any waypoint.
`for operator deselection and reselection of any
`(VI The capability
`station or combination of stations.
`(vi) A mns
`for mnual update of system position by the pilot
`permit insertion of a known present position.
`
`(21 The S tern Disola fi
`Information and Should Provide:
`to at least
`of latitude and longitude
`in te-
`(i) Present position
`the nearest 0.1 minute and in terms of magnetic bearing and distance to or from
`a waypoint to the nearest 0,l nautical mile (ti)
`(distance to the nearest 1.0
`rxni is acceptable for equipment previously approved under TSO% C94 and C94a)
`and nearest degree. Distances of at least 260 nmi should be capable of being
`displayed, but distances greater
`than 99.9 nmi need only be displayed to the
`nearest nautical mile.
`in terrors of latitude and longitude
`(ii) Waypoint position designation
`to at least
`the nearest 0.1 minute or in texms of rrragnetic bearing and distance
`from present position or another waypoint. Way;?oint designation
`in term of
`magnetic bearing and distance should 'be to the nearest degree of bearing and to
`at least 0.1 nmi for distances up to 100 nmi then at least 1.0 nmi for distances
`of 100 nmi or TTY3re.
`crew to prevent the desig-
`NOTE: Information should be provided to the flight
`nation of waypoints by a sequence of bearings and distances
`(i.e.,
`the reference
`for a wypoint designated by bearing and distance should be designated
`position
`-by latitude and longitude).
`(iii)
`(not necessarily
`identification
`A display of active waypoint
`track being flown.
`waypoint position) used to define the navigation
`NOTE: Only systems which define the desired navigation
`track
`in tenors of its
`endpoints can be used to navigate on published airways due to changes in
`mgnetic variation after
`the commissioning of the ground facility.
`
`Par. 7
`
`5
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 5
`
`

`
`AC 20401
`
`g/12/88
`
`in terms of the appropriate
`(iv) A display of the desired track
`nearest 1.0 degree. Display of the appropriate
`magnetic course to atleastthe
`mgnetic course should not require
`the flightcrew
`to input the magnetic
`variation corresponding to the present position.
`the Ewest
`(VI A display of the distance to the active waypoint-to
`previously
`0.1 nmi (distance to the nearest 1.0 ti
`is acceptable for equipnt
`approved under TSO% C94 and C94aL Distances of at least 260 nmi should be
`capable of being displayed, but distances greater
`than 99.9 nmi need only be
`displayed to the nearest 1.0 nmi.
`(vi) A continuous analog (i.e.,
`non-nurrreric) display of crosstrack
`deviation with a minimum full-scale
`deflection of +5.0 nmi, readability of 1.0
`-
`or less, and minim discernable event
`of 0.1 nmi or less.
`ti
`(vii)
`.A display of crosstrack deviation
`to the nearest 0.1 nmi up to
`9.9 nmi and 1.0 nmi beyond, with a range of at least +20 ti.
`This my be a
`IMY be pilot selectable, andneed noF be part of the course
`digital display,
`deviation
`indicator.
`(viii)
`A display of the distance and magnetic bearing (at the rrfromW'
`end of the segment) between way@nts
`to the nearest 1.0 nmi and 1.0 degree.
`(ix) The capability
`to indicate, on d-d,
`the specific ckllega/VW
`stations currently used in the navigation calculations as well as the status of
`6;.
`all stations being tracked.
`waypoint crossing.
`(x) An annunciation of i-ding
`(3) Caution Indication(s)
`for
`the System Should Be Located on or near
`the indicator specified
`in paragraph 7b(2)(vi) and should provide a readily
`discernible caution indication(s)
`to the pilot(s)
`for any of the following:
`. (1)
`Inadequate or invalid navigation signals or sources.
`The absence of primary power.
`(ii)
`Inadequate or invalid navigation displays or output sources.
`(iii)
`Equipment failures.
`(iv)
`Reversion to a secondary dead reckoning rmde of navigation.
`(VI
`-These failure/status
`indications shall occur independently of any opera-
`WIE:
`tor action, Power or navigation equipnt
`failures may be indicated
`in a mn
`manner, The lack of adequate navigation signals or sources (considering sigml-
`to-noise
`ratio
`(SNR) as well as geomtry) should be annunciated when compliance
`with the navigation accuracy specified
`in paragraph 9 cannot be assured.
`(4) The system shall be capable of autmtic
`synchronization within 6.0
`the application of power. Synchronization should be possible with
`minutes after
`a SNR or one station/all
`frequencies of at least 0 &
`in a 100 Hz bandwidth with
`no coherent interference.
`
`6
`
`Par. 7
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 6
`
`

`
`g/12/88
`
`AC 200101~
`
`to determine
`
`Navigation Guidance Should Be Available within 5 seconds of waypoint
`
`(5)
`data input.
`out-
`to meet the criteria
`(6) The Equipment Should Have the Capability
`lined in paragraph 7b(l)
`through 7b(6) throughout the range of environmntal
`conditions which will be encountered in actual service. Exposure of the equip-
`mt
`to the environmntal
`test conditions'of TSOX120 my be used to demnstrate
`Environmental testing
`to obtain a TSO-C94 or TSO-C94a author-
`this capability.
`ization my be used, provided that
`the test
`results demnstrate corrpliance with
`the criteria'of
`paragraphs 7bU)
`through 7b(6).
`'
`(7) The Equipnt Should Provide a Pkans for the Fliqhtcrew
`system status prior
`to flight.
`in
`specified
`(8) The Equivt
`Should Provide the WiqationAccuracy
`paragram 9 for all groundspeeds up to a maxim value to be set by the manufac-
`turer and should provide usable navigation
`information necessary for holding
`patterns conducted with standard rate turns at speeds up to 250 knots
`groundspeed or at a less-
`value specified by the @pnt
`rmnufacturer.
`to
`(9) The IQuiwnt
`Should Provide mans to Alert
`the Flightcrew prior
`arrival at a Fiaypoint to permit turn anticipation
`in accordance with the approx-
`imate formula of 1.0 nmi for each 100 knots of groundspeed. This indicator
`should be located on or nw
`the indicator specified
`in paragraph 7b(2)(vi)-
`a
`For ckrrega/vLF systm which are not coupled to a flight director or autopilot,
`procedural mans based on a continuous and properly
`located distance to waypoint
`System which
`display my be used for waypoint lateral maneuver anticipation.
`provide steering signals for
`flight directors or autopilots should provide
`automtic
`turn anticipation and a waypoint alert which occurs prior
`to the
`initiation
`of the turn by the flight director or autopilot.
`(10) If a Capabiltiy
`for Parallel Offset Tracks is Provided, track selec-
`tion should be in incrmmts
`of at least 1.0 nmi left or right up to an offset
`of at least 20 nmi. &ans should be provided to continuously
`indicate
`that an
`track has been selected. Waypoint alerting and turn anticipation
`should
`offset
`be provided prior
`to arrival at the point where the offset
`intersects
`the angle
`These functions sho-uld operate as described in
`bisector of the ,oarent track.
`paragraph 7bt9L
`c. Software Changes. The provisions of this paragraph apply to &ga/VLF
`quipmnt which utilizes a digital
`corquter
`to provide navigation
`information or
`system monitoring.
`The computer program (software) operates the computer and
`provides the basic functions of these system.
`The software for navigation
`functions of Qqa/VLF equipnt
`described in paragraph 7b (for 0mga/VLF used
`for
`IFR operations) should be verified and validated
`to at least the level 2
`requirments as defined by R!KA/DO-178A, Software Considerations in Airborne
`System and Equi,mnent Certification.
`Any changes to software which affects
`navigational
`functions are considered to be major changes to the equipmnt.
`Unless software partitioning
`has been previously established, any change to
`level 1 or level 2software of ckru3ga/VLF navigation equipnt
`should be verified
`and validated
`to the appropriate
`level and should be demonstrated as not having
`changes to
`inadvertently affected
`the ramining navigational
`functions.
`software used for ma/VW
`quipnt
`limited
`to VF'R use or equipment having
`
`Par. 7
`
`7
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 7
`
`

`
`AC 204OlC
`
`g/12/88
`
`in
`functions
`which provides navigational
`from software
`established partitioning
`and do mt require prior approval by the
`IFR system are considered to 'be minor
`onutga/V~F equipnt
`has a software
`FM, providing
`the manufacturer of the
`-
`configuration mnagment and quality assurance plan approved by the FAA.
`Software status must be identified on the outside of the associated line
`replaceable unit
`in accordance with the criteria
`of RTcA/DO-178A.-- Software
`changes in TSO approved equipment must be reported to the cognizant Aircraft
`If
`the equipmnt displays a software
`identifier
`to the
`Certification
`office.
`flightcrew,
`the airplane or rotorcraft
`flight manual (or appropriate placard)
`Software changes incorporated
`in
`should indicate
`the approved identifier,
`epment
`already installed
`in an aircraft my require additional evaluation and
`possible flight manual supplement revision prior
`to returning
`the aircraft
`to
`service, depending upon the scope of the change.
`8 0 EQUIPMEW INSTALLXTION CONSIDERA!TIONS FOR USE UNDER IFR.
`a. Location of the mqa/VLF Display. Each display element, used as a pri-
`mry
`flight
`instrumnt
`in the guidance and control of the aircraft,
`for maneuver
`anticipation,
`or for
`failure annunciation, should be located where it
`is clearly
`to the pilot
`(in the pilot's
`primary field of view) with the least pracl
`visible
`deviation
`from the pilot's
`norm1 position and line of vision when
`ticable
`looking
`forward along the flight path.
`Any probable failure of the airborne Omega/VIZ nav-
`b l
`Failure Protection.
`igation system should not degrade the normal operation of other required equip-
`mnt or create a flight hazard. Norml operation of the Wga/VLF
`installation
`should mt adversely affect
`the performanc e of other aircraft
`equi-t.
`c. Enviromntal Conditions. The aircraft
`envirorxwnt
`in which the
`&ega/W
`system is installed should be found to be mpatible with
`environrrrental categories
`to which the eguipment was tested.
`d. Electromqnetic
`Interference.
`The ma/W
`navigation system should
`not be the source of objectionable electmmgnetic
`interference,
`nor be
`adversely affected by electromgnetic
`interference
`from other equi,wru3nt in the
`aircraft.
`If an E-Field antenna (whip, plate, or blade type>
`e. P-Static Protection.
`is used, the aircraft
`should -be protected by acceptable bonding techniques and in-
`stallation
`These protective devices should be specified
`of static discharger;.
`as part of the approved design data for the Omega/VW installation.
`The capa-
`bility
`to provide satisfactory P-static protection
`for the mga/VLF system
`should be derrronstrated as part of the initial
`certification
`program and for each
`subsequent installation
`using an E-Field antenna. This testing may be accowi
`lished by ground or static
`testing
`if sufficient
`data is provided to detwnstrate
`that
`the proposed technique is equivalent
`to flight
`If a flight
`testing-
`demnstration
`is selected,
`it must be conduct& at speedy UP to Vne,
`Vm, or k
`through known P-static conditions such as a cloud of ice
`crystals. mmntary
`loss of signal when encountering heavy P-static conditions
`my be acceptable provided the eguipnt
`is capable of providing acceptable
`navigation
`information during such conditions.
`
`8
`
`Par. 7
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 8
`
`

`
`g/12/88
`
`AC 20401c
`
`P-static charging of the aircraft
`(1) P-Static Charqinq/Discharqinq.
`ratio by one of three rrvajor
`can cause degradation of the signal-to-noise
`mechanisms: sparkover of isolated metal panels, corona discharge, and strearrrer
`currents,
`Sparkover of isolated metal panels can be handled by appropriate
`bonding. This bonding needs to occur on all control and trim surfaces as well
`as isolated access panels. Bonding should be evaluated by a-careful ohmic
`survey (an electrical
`bonding limit of 10 milliohms is considered acceptable) of
`each aircraft
`in which the ma/VU?
`system is installed or by other suitable
`techniques. The effects caused by streamer currents can be reducd by placing
`the receiving antenna as far as possible from any nonconductive surfaces such as
`windshields.
`The nonconductive surfaces may be coated with a conductive
`Tarporary spray coatings are not satisfactory.
`mrona discharge can
`coating.
`be reduced by the appropriate placing of orthodecoupled static dischargers on
`the &r&ties
`of the aircraft.
`A number of recent studies have shown that
`the
`frayed-wick
`types of discharger rapidly
`lose their effectiveness as a result of
`use. Therefore, dischargers constructed with a high resistance
`rod and rrretal
`pins are recmmmded although other types may also be used if
`they can
`d-n&rate
`ability
`to provide protection
`from radio frequency U?EY coupling to
`the &ga/W
`antenna. The number, type, and location of these static
`dischargers to be installed on a particular
`aircraft model should be determined
`by following
`the instructions provided by the manufacturer of the static
`discharger for ?-static protection.
`is instal-
`in which the &ga/vLF
`f
`Anti-Ice Protection.
`If
`the aircraft
`led is approved for
`flight
`into known icing conditions,
`the antenna should have
`anti-ice protection or be found not to be susceptible
`to ice buildup. Alter-
`natively,
`if
`the ma/VW
`system can 'be shown to operate satisfactorily
`when
`the antenna is subject to icing, or if
`the system is limited via placard or
`flight mual
`to indicate
`that
`it
`is not to be us&l for navigation during flight
`in icing conditions,
`then anti-ice protection
`is not required.
`9 Dynamic Responses. The system shall continue to indicate aircraft
`posi-
`tion
`to the accuracy specified
`in paragraph 9 during aircraft maneuvering or
`changes in attitude encountered in nonrral operations, assuming secondary inputs
`are not lost during the maneuver.
`h System Controls.
`The system controls should 'be arranged to provide
`adqu&e protection against inadvertent system turnoff.
`The controls
`for system
`operation should be radily
`accessible to, and usable by, the flightcrew and 'be
`visible under all expected lighting conditions,
`including night and direct
`sunlight.
`IER use
`approval of an &tzga/VLF system for
`system Tests. The initial
`i.
`involves extensive testing
`to demxstrate system performance, operational areas,
`enviromntal
`qualifications,
`etc., as described in paragraph 7b(6). Subsequent
`installations
`in other aircraft
`need o&nly be tested to the extent necessary to
`d-n&rate
`proper operation of interfacing aircraft
`equipxant such as
`autopilots,
`flight directors and instrument displays, satisfactory
`antenna
`installations
`as evidenced by the reception of Orrega/VLF signals during normal
`flight maneuvers (including P-static conditions
`for E-Field antennas),
`satisfactory
`clearance of EMI, and functional check of the Ort~ga/V'U? equipment.
`
`d
`
`Par. 8
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 9
`
`

`
`AC ZO-101C
`
`g/12/88
`
`.
`in
`should be installed
`Instructions. Wga/VLF equipnt
`I Manufacturer's
`accordance with instructions and limitations
`provided by the manufacturer of the
`equimnt.
`9 . SYSTEM ACCURACY.
`a. En route IFR Operation Along Random (Off Airways) RNU7 Routes with Radar
`Coverage. The error of the airborne Orrrega/VLF equipnt
`should be less than
`+3.8 nmi of crosstrack error on a 95 percent probability
`basis and +3.8 rxni of
`-
`glong-track error on a 95 percent probability
`basis.
`The error of the airborne
`b En route IFR @eration on Airways in the NAS.
`Onega;VW equipnvtnt
`sh ould be less than +2.8 nmi of crosstrack error on a 95
`percent probability
`basis and +2.8 nmi OF along-track error on a 95 percent
`probability
`basis for approval-of en route IFR operations on airways.
`c. Flight Technical (Pilotage) ELrrors. With satisfactory
`displays of
`the FAA has determined that
`flight
`technical errors can be.?
`crosstrack position,
`expected to be less than the values shown below on a twosigma 'basis.
`Flicrht Technical Error
`Flight Condition
`En route
`+l.O nmi
`-
`that
`tests o Lc the installation
`should be conducted to verify
`flight
`Sufficient
`these values can be maintain&
`Smiler values for
`flight
`technical errors
`should not be expected, unless the Qxxzga/VLF system is to be used only when
`however, at least
`the total systm crosstrack accuracy
`coupled to an autopilot;
`shown below should be maintained.
`the total cross-
`technical errors,
`flight
`If an installation
`results
`in larger
`track error of the system should be determined by combining equipment and flight
`technical errors using the root sum square (RSS) rr&hod. The result should be
`less than the values listed below.
`Total Crosstrack Error
`Flight Condition
`+4.0 nmi
`Random RNAV Routes
`T3.0 nmi
`En route, on Airways
`-
`APPROVAL There are two types of approval which differ
`IFK AIRWWHIhBS
`10.
`greatly as to test
`requirents
`and data analysis.
`to the
`tirworthiness Approval. This type of approval refers
`a. First-Time
`rcw>del orrU;ga/W equiprrsent for
`very first
`tim an applicant presents a particular
`FAA airworthiness
`installation
`approval and certification
`for an IFR navigation
`system. Any new .&els of Wga/W? equipixnt by the same mufacturer
`should
`undergo the same approval process as the original eauipment unless it can be
`shawrl by analysis and tests
`that
`the new model will-function
`as well or better
`approval is conducted in three
`than the approved equipment. A first-time
`phases:
`
`10
`
`Par. 8
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 10
`
`

`
`g/12/88
`
`AC 20401c
`
`that all probable
`
`This phase consists
`
`(1) Lab/Bench Tests and -parrent Data Evaluation.
`of the following:
`and
`(i) Analysis of the manufacturer's procedures for verification
`validation of software and review of supporting documntation
`in accordance with
`the guidelines of R!KA/Do-178A where system performs navigational
`functions.
`. -.
`(ii) Verification
`of compliance with appropriate enviro~nmental
`standards such as RKA/DO-16OB.
`qualification
`display capabilities with
`(iii) Examination of the quimnt's
`emphasis on warning, caution, and advisory annunciations.
`(iv) Analysis of failure mdes.
`(v) Review of reliability
`data to establish
`failures are detected.
`(vi) Evaluation of the mse of use of the controls and of the viewing
`ease of the displays and annunciations from a humn factors point of view.
`(vii) Review of installation
`and mintenance manuals.
`(viii) Evaluation of operator's manual (pilot's
`guide).
`(2) Aircraft
`Installation Data Evaluation. Normlly
`the mnufacturer of
`the -a/W?
`equipnt will provide an aircraft
`as a test bed for a first-time
`approval. This first-time
`installation
`approval will serve as a
`installation
`basis for any subsequent installation
`approvals regardless of aircraft
`type or
`The following assessments are .to be made:
`mdel.
`(i) Review of installation
`drawings, wiring diagram, and
`descriptive wiring
`routing.
`layout of the installed equipment with
`(ii) Evaluation of the cockpit
`emphasis on equipmnt controls, applicable circuit breakers (labels and acces-
`switching arrangemnt and related
`indicators, displays, and
`sibility),
`annunciators.
`(iii) Analysis of a data flow diagram in order to review which
`transmits what data to which other equipment.
`in
`installation
`(iv) Review of a structural analysis of the equipnt
`order to ascertain whether all ma/VU'
`coponents are satisfactorily
`attached
`to the basic aircraft
`structure.
`in order to verify
`load analysis
`(v) Examination of an electrical
`installation will
`that the added electrical
`power requirements of the -a/W?
`not cause overloading of the aircraft%
`electrical
`generating capacity.
`(vi) Evaluation of the antenna installation.
`A critical
`aspect of
`of the antenna. The Omqa/VJLF
`1 l s the installation
`any Q-tqa/VLF installation
`
`equipnznt
`
`Par. 10
`
`-
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1012
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 11
`
`

`
`AC 20401C
`
`g/12/88
`
`the value of the
`is quite weak, typically much less than one-third
`signal
`in the vicinity of the antenna can render
`background noise. Electrical mise
`the ortlega/vLF equip&
`useless.
`A E-Field antenna (whip, plate, or blade type). Precipitation
`static has an ad;ferse effect upon the sigml
`receiving capability of this
`type
`of antenna. The adverse effects of precipitation
`static can be minimized by use
`of the proper antenna type and location, by installation
`of high-quality
`static
`dischargers, by proper bonding, and by application of anti-static
`paint on all
`plastic nonconducting surfaces. The manufacturer's
`installation
`or maintenance
`manual usually describes "good" E-Field antenna installation
`practices.
`J5UL-E: Each aircraft
`should be subjected to a careful ohmic survey of bonding
`(an electrical
`bonding limit of 10 milliohm
`is considered acceptable).
`The
`P-static protection
`is a fequired part of the &aga/VLF installation
`and must be
`maintained for proper system operations.
`The signal receiving quality of
`B H-Field antenna (loop type).
`type of ant&a
`is adversely affected by aircraft
`electrical
`skin currents,
`this
`by 400 Hz ac. P-static has no appreciable effect on an H-Field
`particularly
`antenna, and its effects can usually be ignored. A procedure called "skin mp-
`ping" is normally employed to determine a good munting
`location.
`It should be
`noted that shifting major aircraft
`electrical mmponents to different
`locations
`within
`the aircraft my render a previously determined skin mp location
`unsuitable.
`the effectiveness of an HiField
`to verify
`is a simple test
`NOTE: The following
`located by skin mapping. Park the aircraft
`away from any
`antenna installation
`noise source. Using only the aircraft's
`battery, and with
`external electrical
`equipment off, activate
`the Omega/VU? equipment and record
`all other electrical
`signal-to-noise
`values (or quality
`factors)
`for all
`receivable stations.
`Itepst
`this process of recording signal-to-noise
`values (or quality
`factors) with
`engine0
`running and all electrical/electronic
`equipment operating on aircraft
`If
`the antenna installation
`is satisfactory,
`there should not be any
`power.
`significant
`degradation in signal-to-noise
`ratio values or quality
`factors.
`(3) Flight Test Evaluations.
`Flight
`tests are conducted in two stages:
`(i) Functional Flight Tests Consist of:
`A Evaluation of all operating modes of the mga/VW equipmnt.
`-
`B lamination of the interface
`(function) of other equipmnt
`connected to the-mga/VLF.
`r&es and associated annunciations
`C Review of various failure
`such as loss of &ctrical
`power, loss of sigml
`reception, &ga/VW quip=nt
`failure,
`etc.
`
`the -a/VW
`
`D Evaluation of steering response while au\opilot
`is coupled to
`eqzipment during a variety of different
`track changes.
`
`12
`
`Par. 10
`
`T-Mobile / TCS

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket