throbber
Curriculum Vitae for
`William R. Michalson
`
`Research Associates, LLC
`26 West Main Street, STE 2
`Dudley, MA 01571
`Email: wrm@wmichalson.com
`Tel: (508) 461-6242
`Cell: (508) 331-4134
`
`
`1. Personal:
`
`1.1 Education
`
`Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering, 1989, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester,
`Massachusetts.
`
`
`Dissertation:
`
`A Parallel Computer Architecture for Real-Time Decision Making. The
`dissertation develops a hierarchical, multiple processor, computer
`architecture for executing artificial intelligence programs in real-time.
`Dissertation Directors: Dr. Peter E. Green and Dr. R. James Duckworth.
`
`
`Minor Areas: Minor sequences completed in Mathematics and Physics.
`
`
`Specialties:
`Area examinations passed in the fields of Computer Architecture,
`Probabilistic Systems Analysis, and State Space Analysis.
`
`
`M.S. in Electrical Engineering, 1985, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts.
`
`
`Specialties:
`
`The courses taken stressed Computer Architecture, Communications
`Systems, and Solid-State Physics.
`
`
`B.S. in Electrical Engineering, 1981, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`1.2 Work experiences - Academic.
`
`1991-Present Worcester Polytechnic Institute
`Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Professor of Computer
`Science.
`Effective July 1, 2005 Promoted to the rank of Full Professor (Professor of
`Electrical and Professor of Computer Science)
`Appointed dual professorship, adding the title of
`Associate Professor of Computer Science.
`Granted tenure and promoted to the rank of Associate
`Professor.
`Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering (tenure-
`track).
`Visiting Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering.
`Adjunct Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`November 17, 2004
`
`July 1, 1998
`
`August 1, 1992
`
`August 1, 1991
`January 1, 1990
`
`1.3 Work experiences other than teaching (chronological).
`
`Grid Roots, LLC
`
`2012-2014
`
`Grid Roots, LLC is a company which was formed in 2012 for the purpose of commercializing a
`navigation and tracking device for use by children and the elderly to allow caregivers to non-
`intrusively monitor their activities. The system under development integrates GPS, inertial and
`beacon-based navigation technologies to develop a system for users to track deployed devices.
`My responsibilities within Grid Roots, LLC relate to hardware and software engineering, as well
`as the development of IP related to tracking individuals.
`
`1995-Present Research Associates, LLC
`
`Research Associates, LLC is a company I formed in which I perform engineering and consulting
`in the areas of computer systems, communications and navigation. All of my litigation-related
`and other consulting activities are performed through Research Associates, LLC.
`
`1988-1991 Raytheon Company
`
`Subsequent to receiving my Ph. D., I returned to the Equipment Division of the Raytheon
`Company. Shortly after I returned, I was promoted to a title of Engineer, Design and
`Development which was the highest title I could hold based on my level of education and years
`of experience. Within a year, I was selected to sit on the engineering staff of a newly formed
`System Engineering Department of the Division’s Computer and Displays Laboratory. In this
`department I acted primarily as a consultant to other departments within the laboratory. My
`responsibilities ranged from leading the hardware/software development of supercomputer-class
`computer systems to performing applied research into the exploitation of new technology. My
`role was similar to that of a Principle Investigator in an academic setting as I was responsible for
`securing funding and personnel, leading research efforts, interacting with the research sponsor,
`and reporting results. At the time of my departure I was involved with the following projects:
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`
`Fault-Tolerant Multiprocessor
`The development of a highly fault tolerant, highly reliable, real-time computer system
`intended for long-duration spaceborne applications. This system is designed to produce
`in excess of one gigaoperation per second of raw processing power.
`
`Optimal Task Allocation
`A program of applied research into the use of Genetic Algorithms for deriving optimal
`mappings of software tasks to the hardware processing elements in distributed systems.
`
`Performance Modeling and Scaling
`This project focused on the development of simulation models for characterizing the
`performance of a large scale multiple processor system. These models formed a basis for
`predicting system performance for several different hardware configurations to ensure
`compliance with system specifications.
`
`
`High Clutter Signal Detection
`A program of applied research into the use of Neural Networks to detect the presence of
`targets in extremely high clutter environments.
`
`
`Power Efficient Computing
`A program of applied research into an Integrated Optical computer structure that is
`designed to maximize the number of computations that can be performed per unit of
`power.
`
`1985-1988 Raytheon Company (Leave of Absence)
`
`In 1985 I became one of two people in the Equipment Division to receive Aldo Miccioli
`Fellowships. This Fellowship was awarded to allow me to pursue full-time study towards the
`Ph.D. degree. I returned to Raytheon during the summer of 1986, but otherwise remained on
`leave of absence to dedicate my time to my studies.
`
`1982-1985 Raytheon Company
`
`Engineer in the VLSI Design Department of the Computer and Displays Laboratory within
`Raytheon's Equipment Division. I was lead engineer for the design of several semi-custom VLSI
`circuits for both signal and data processing applications.
`
`1981-1982 Raytheon Company
`
`Engineer in the Cursive Displays Department of the Computer and Displays Laboratory. I
`designed and debugged circuit assemblies which were used in vector displays for air traffic
`control applications.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`1.4 Consulting experiences.
`
`1.4.1 Law-Related
`
`
`Locata LBS LLC v. YellowPages.com LLC,
`Retained by Baker Botts on behalf of defendant YellowPages.com. Case before the Central
`District of California (2:13-cv-07664). See also IPR2015-00151. Retained 9/14 to present.
`
`M/A-COM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. v. Laird Technologies, Inc.
`Retained by Erise IP on behalf of Laird Technologies, Inc., for invalidity consulting regarding
`U.S. Patent No. 6,272,349. Retained 6/14 to present.
`
`Certusview Technologies, LLC v. S&N Locating Services, LLC and S&N Communications,
`Inc.,
`Retained by Baker &McKenzie on behalf of defendant S&N. Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patents
`8,265,344, 8,290,204, 8,340,359, 8,407,001, and 8,532,341. Case before the Eastern District of
`Virginia, (2:13-cv-346). Deposed 11/8/14; Retained 6/14 to 12/14.
`
`adidas AG and adidas America, Inc. v. Under Armour, Inc. and MapMyFitness, Inc.
`Retained by Kilpatrick Townsend on behalf of plaintiff adidas. Case before the District of
`Delaware, (1:14-cv-00130). Retained 5/14 to present.
`
`GeoTag, Inc., v. AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Services, Inc.,
`Retained by Baker Botts as an expert on behalf of defendant AT&T. Patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent
`5,930,474. Case before the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, (3:13-cv-00169).
`Deposed 5/29/14; Retained 1/14 to 9/14. Matter settled.
`
`Nokia Corp v. HTC Corp.
`Retained by Quinn Emanuel as an expert on behalf of defendant HTC. Case being litigated in
`Germany. Patent number EP0766811B1. Retained 12/13 to 2/14. Matter settled.
`
`Porto Technology, Co., Ltd. et al. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
`Retained by Wiley-Rein as an expert on behalf of defendant Verizon. Case before the United
`States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Case No. 3:13-cv-00265). Retained
`10/13 to 2/14. Matter dismissed.
`
`Nokia Corp v. HTC Corp.
`Retained by McDermott Will and Emery and White & Case as an expert on behalf of defendant
`HTC. Case before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Case No. Case
`No. 1:12-cv-00550-UNA and Case No. 1:12-cv-551-UNA. Retained 6/13 to 2/14. Matter
`settled.
`
`NXP B.V. v. Research In Motion, Ltd., et al.
`Retained by Fish and Richardson as an expert on behalf of defendant Research In Motion.
`Patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent 6,501,420. Case before the United States District Court for the
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`Middle District of Florida (Case No. 6:12-cv-00498). Deposed 9/18/13; Testified in Court:
`4/1/14 and 4/2/14; Retained 5/13 to 4/14.
`
`Vehicle IP LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., et al.
`Retained by Polsinelli-Shugart, as an expert on behalf of defendant Werner Enterprises. Patent-
`in-suit is U.S. Patent 5,694,322. Case before the United States District Court for the District of
`Delaware (Case No. 1:10-cv-00503). Deposed 7/15/13 and 9/20/13; Testified in Court: 9/27/13
`and 9/30/13; Retained 4/13 to 9/13.
`
`TracBeam, LLC v. Google Inc.
`Retained by Quinn-Emanuel as an expert on behalf of defendant Google. Patents-in-suit are U.S.
`Patents 7,764,231 and 7,525,484. Case before the United States District Court for the Eastern
`District of Texas (6:11-cv-00093). Deposed 2/5/14; Retained 3/13 to 6/14.
`
`Microsoft Corporation and Google Inc., v. GeoTag, Inc.
`Retained by Perkins-Coie as an expert on behalf of plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. Patent-in-
`suit is U.S. Patents 5,930,474. Case before the United States District Court for the District of
`Delaware (1:11-cv-00175). Retained 1/13 to present.
`
`GeoTag, Inc., v. Frontier Communications Corp., et al.,
`Retained by multiple firms as an expert on behalf of defendants. Patent-in-suit is U.S. Patents
`5,930,474. Case before the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, (2:10-cv-00265; other
`defendants are listed in case numbers 2:10-cv-00265, 2:10-cv-00272, 2:10-cv-00437, 2:10-cv-
`00569, 2:10-cv-00570, 2:10-cv-00571, 2:10-cv-00572, 2:10-cv-00573, 2:10-cv-00574, 2:10-cv-
`00575, 2:10-cv-00587, 2:11-cv-00175, 2:11-cv-00404, 2:11-cv-00421, 2:11-cv-00424, 2:11-cv-
`00425, 2:11-cv-00570, 2:12-cv-00043, 2:12-cv-00051, 2:12-cv-00436, 2:12-cv-00438, 2:12-cv-
`00439, 2:12-cv-00441, 2:12-cv-00442, 2:12-cv-00444, 2:12-cv-00445, 2:12-cv-00446, 2:12-cv-
`00447, 2:12-cv-00448, 2:12-cv-00449, 2:12-cv-00450, 2:12-cv-00452, 2:12-cv-00454, 2:12-cv-
`00456, 2:12-cv-00459, 2:12-cv-00460, 2:12-cv-00462, 2:12-cv-00464, 2:12-cv-00466, 2:12-cv-
`00468, 2:12-cv-00469, 2:12-cv-00470, 2:12-cv-00471, 2:12-cv-00473, 2:12-cv-00474, 2:12-cv-
`00475, 2:12-cv-00476, 2:12-cv-00476, 2:12-cv-00477, 2:12-cv-00480, 2:12-cv-00481, 2:12-cv-
`00482, 2:12-cv-00482, 2:12-cv-00483, 2:12-cv-00486, 2:12-cv-00487, 2:12-cv-00520, 2:12-cv-
`00521, 2:12-cv-00523, 2:12-cv-00524, 2:12-cv-00525, 2:12-cv-00527, 2:12-cv-00528, 2:12-cv-
`00530, 2:12-cv-00532, 2:12-cv-00534, 2:12-cv-00535, 2:12-cv-00536, 2:12-cv-00537, 2:12-cv-
`00542, 2:12-cv-00543, 2:12-cv-00545, 2:12-cv-00547, 2:12-cv-00548, 2:12-cv-00549, 2:12-cv-
`00550, 2:12-cv-00551, 2:12-cv-00552, 2:12-cv-00555, 2:12-cv-00556, 2:12-cv-00570, 2:12-cv-
`00572, 2:12-cv-00573, 2:12-cv-00575, 2:12-cv-00587, 3:13-cv-00217). Deposed 5/29/14;
`Retained 1/13 to 9/14.
`
`MOSAID Technologies Inc., v. Realtek Semiconductor Corporation
`Retained by Sidley Austin, LLP as an expert on behalf of defendant Realtek Semiconductor
`Corporation. Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patents 5,131,006; 5,151,920; 5,422,887; 5,706,428;
`6,563,786; and 6,992,972. Case before the United States District Court for the Eastern District
`of Texas (Tyler Division) (Case No. 2:11-cv-00179). Retained 12/12 to 12/12. Matter settled.
`
`Hoyt A. Flemming v. Cobra Electronics Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`Retained by Sidley Austin, LLP as an expert on behalf of defendant Cobra Electronics
`Corporation. Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patents RE39038, RE40653 and RE41905. Case before the
`United States District Court for the District of Idaho (Case No. 1:12-cv-00392). Retained 11/12
`to 06/13. Matter settled.
`
`LBS Innovations LLC v. Aaron Bros., Inc., et al.
`Retained as an expert on behalf of defendants Whole Foods Marketplace, Comerica, Hotels.com,
`Academy, Ltd., and Homestyle Dining. Patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent 6,091,956. Case before the
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, (Case No. 2:11-cv-00142-MHS-CMC. Deposed
`10/5/12; Retained 7/12 to 12/12. Plaintiff moved to dismiss.
`
`Advanced Media Networks, L.L.C. v. Gogo LLC et al.
`Retained by Sidley Austin, LLP as an expert on behalf of defendant Gogo. Patent-in-suit is U.S.
`Patent 5,960,074. Case before the United States District Court for the Central District of
`California (Case No. 11-cv-10474). Deposed 2/6/13. Retained 7/12 to 8/13.
`
`Walker Digital, LLC v. Google Inc.
`Retained by O’Melveny & Meyers, LLP as an expert on behalf of defendant Google Inc.
`Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patents 6,199,014. Case before the United States District Court for the
`District of Delaware (Case No. 1:11-cv-00309-SLR). Deposed 2/27/13 - 2/28/13. Retained 6/12
`to present (case stayed as of 8/13).
`
`Silver State Intellectual Technologies, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc., et al.
`Retained by Erise IP, P.A. as an expert on behalf of defendants Garmin International, Inc. and
`Garmin USA, Inc. Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patents 6,525,768; 6,529,824; 6,542,812; 7,343,165;
`7,522,992; 7,593,812; 7,650,234; 7,702,455 and 7,739,039. Case before the United States
`District Court for the District of Nevada (Case No. 2:11-cv-1578). Deposed 2/19/14; Testified in
`Court: 5/21/15; Retained 4/12 to 5/15.
`
`Beacon Navigation GmbH v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al.
`Retained by Kirkland & Ellis, LLP on behalf of defendants Toyota Motor Corporation; Toyota
`Motor North America, Inc.; Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc.; Toyota Motor Engineering &
`Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc.; Toyota Motor
`Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc.; Toyota Motor Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc.; Mazda Motor
`Corporation; Mazda Motor of America, Inc.; Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd.; Fuji Heavy Industries
`U.S.A. Inc.; Subaru of America, Inc.; Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC; Jaguar Cars
`Limited; Land Rover; Volvo Car Corporation; and Volvo Cars of North America, LLC; Adduci
`Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP on behalf of defendants Suzuki and Garmin; Crowell-Moring on
`behalf of General Motors; Dickstein Shapiro on behalf og Chrysler Group, LLC; Finnegan,
`Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner on behalf of Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, BMW of
`North America, LLC, and BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC; Fish & Richardson on behalf of
`Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Honda North America, Inc., American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda
`Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC, Honda Manufacturing of Indiana, LLC, and Honda of
`America, Mfg., Inc.; Frommer Lawrence and Haug, LLP on behalf of Dr. Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG
`and Porsche Cars North America, Inc.; Hogan Lovells on behalf of Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz
`USA, LLC, or Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.; Quinn-Emanuel on behalf of Nissan and
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`Ford. Case before the US International Trade Commission, Washington D.C., in the matter of:
`“Certain Automotive Navigation Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same,
`Inv. No. 337-TA-814. Case withdrawn by Plaintiff. Retained 1/12 – 4/12.
`
`
`
`Beacon Navigation GmbH v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al.
`Retained by Kirkland & Ellis, LLP on behalf of defendants Toyota Motor Corporation; Toyota
`Motor North America, Inc.; Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc.; Toyota Motor Engineering &
`Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc.; Toyota Motor
`Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc.; Toyota Motor Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc.; Mazda Motor
`Corporation; Mazda Motor of America, Inc.; Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd.; Fuji Heavy Industries
`U.S.A. Inc.; Subaru of America, Inc.; Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC; Jaguar Cars
`Limited; Land Rover; Volvo Car Corporation; and Volvo Cars of North America, LLC. Multiple
`cases before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Case numbers 1:11-
`cv-00942-UNA, 1:11-cv-00941-UNA, 1:11-cv-00951-UNA, 1:11-cv-00952-UNA, 1:11-cv-
`00936-UNA, 1:11-cv-00937-UNA, 1:11-cv-00955-UNA, 1:11-cv-00959-UNA, and 1:11-cv-
`00960-UNA. Currently stayed. Retained 1/12 to Present.
`
`Beacon Wireless Solutions, Inc., et al., v. Garmin International, Inc., et al.
`Retained by Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP as an expert on behalf of defendant Garmin. Matter
`involves alleged trade secret misappropriation. Case before the United States District Court for
`the Western District of Virginia, Harrisonburg Division (Case No. 5:11-cv-00025). Testified in
`Court: 5/25/12. Retained 12/11 to 5/25/12.
`
`Tramontane IP, LLC v. Garmin Int'l, Inc., et al.
`Retained by Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP as an expert on behalf of defendant Garmin. Patents-
`in-suit are U.S. Patents 6,526,268 and 7,133,775. Case before the United States District Court
`for the Eastern District of Virginia (Case No. 1:2011-cv-00918). Case Settled. Retained 11/11
`to 12/11.
`
`Sourceprose, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc., MetroPCS Communications, Inc., et al.
`Retained by Kilpatrick Townsend as an expert on behalf of defendant AT&T. Patents-in-suit are
`US Patent Nos. 7,142,217 and 7,161,604. Case before the United States District Court for the
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division. Case number 1:11-cv-00117. Retained 11/11 to
`present.
`
`Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. and Furuno U.S.A., Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.
`Retained by Quinn-Emanuel as an expert on behalf of complainant Furuno. Case before the US
`International Trade Commission, Washington D.C., in the matter of: “Certain GPS Navigation
`Products, Components Thereof, and Related Software,” Investigation number 337-TA-810.
`Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 6,084,565; 7,095,367; 7,089,094; and 7,161,561. Case
`settled. Retained 8/11 – 12/11.
`
`Honeywell International, Inc. v. Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. and Furuno U.S.A., Inc.
`Retained by Quinn-Emanuel as an expert on behalf of respondent Furuno. Case before the US
`International Trade Commission, Washington D.C., in the matter of: “Certain GPS Navigation
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`Products, Components Thereof, and Related Software,” Investigation number 337-TA-783.
`Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,209,070; 6,865,452; 5,461,388; and 6,088,653. Case
`Settled. Retained 8/11 – 12/11.
`
`Triangle Software, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc.
`Retained by Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP., as an expert on behalf of defendant Garmin.
`Patents-in-suit are US Patents 7,557,730, 7,221,287, 7,375,649, 7,508,321 and 7,702,452. Case
`before the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Case No. 1:10-cv-1457
`CMH/TCB. Deposed 7/28/11; Testified in Court: 11/3/11 (jury trial). Retained 4/11 to 11/11.
`
`Garmin International, Inc. v. Pioneer Corporation and Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc.
`Retained by Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP as an expert on behalf of plaintiff Garmin. Patents-
`in-suit are U.S. Patents 5,365,448; 5,424,951; and 6,122,592. Case before the United States
`District Court for the District of Kansas. Case No. 10-CV-2080 JWL/GLR. Declarative
`Judgment action stayed. Retained 3/11 to 11/11.
`
`Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. And Visteon Technologies, LLC v. Garmin
`International, Inc.
`Retained by Shook, Hardy and Bacon as an expert on behalf of defendant Garmin. Patents-in-
`suit are US Patents 5,544,060, 5,654,892, 5,832,408, 5,987,375 and 6,097,316. Case before the
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 2:10-cv-10578--PDB-
`MAR. Deposed 10/9/12; Retained 12/10 to present.
`
`Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing, LLC. v. Realtek Semiconductor
`Corporation
`Retained by Sidley-Austin as an expert on behalf of respondent Realtek Semiconductor. Case
`before the US International Trade Commission, Washington D.C., in the matter of: “Certain
`Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, Modules, And Components
`Thereof,” Investigation number 337-TA-741. Patent-in-suit is US Patent 6,121,941. Deposed
`6/29/11; Testified in Court: 9/15/11 and 9/16/11. Retained 11/10 – 9/11.
`
`Ambato Media, LLC. v. Clarion Co., LTD., et al.
`Retained by Traurig-Greenberg as an expert on behalf of defendant Garmin. Patent-in-suit is US
`Patent 5,432,542. Case before the United States District Court for the Eastern District Of Texas,
`Marshall Division. Case number 2:09-CV-242. Deposed 4/26/12 and 5/10/12; Testified in
`Court: 7/11/12. Retained 10/10 to present.
`
`Gabriel Technologies Corporation and Trace Technologies, LLC, v. Qualcomm
`Incorporated, Snaptrack, Inc. and Norman Krasner
`Retained by Cooley-Godward as an expert on behalf of defendants Qualcomm, Snaptrack, and
`Krasner. Trade secret misappropriation case related to US Patents 6,377,209, 6,583,757,
`6,661,372, 6,799,050, 6,861,980, 6,895,249, 7,254,402, 7,289,786, 7,319,876, 7,421,277,
`7,446,655, 7,570,958, 7,574,195, and 7,660,588. Case before the Southern District of California
`San Diego Division, Case No. 08-cv-1992 MMA POR. Retained 6/10 to 7/12.
`
`SiRF/CSR v. Global Locate/Broadcom Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`Retained by Wilmer-Hale as an expert on behalf of defendant Global Locate / Broadcom.
`Patents-in-suit are US Patents 5,663,735, 6,480,150, 6,519,466, 6,650,879, 6,882,827, 6,934,322,
`7,412,157, 7,236,883, and 7,573,422. Case before the Central District of California, Case No.
`8:06-cv-01216 and Case No. 8:10-cv-01281. Retained 9/10 to 1/11.
`
`Pioneer Electronics v. Garmin Corporation
`Retained by Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP as an expert on behalf of respondent Garmin In the
`matter of Certain Multimedia Display and Navigation Devices and Systems, Components
`Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-694. Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patents
`5,365,448; 5,424,951; and 6,122,592. Case before the U.S. International Trade Commission.
`Deposed on 7/29/10; Testified at technology tutorial (8/27/20) and in the evidentiary hearing
`(9/20/10). Retained 4/10 to 9/10.
`
`EMSAT Advanced Geo-Location Technology, LLC and Location Based Services LLC, v.
`AT&T Mobility, LLC
`Retained by Baker-Botts as an expert on behalf of defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC. Patents-in-
`suit are U.S. Patents 7,289,763; 5,946,611; 6,324,404; and 6,847,822. Case before the U.S.
`District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 4:08 CV 822.
`Deposed 5/4/10; Testified in Court: 5/10/10 (Markman hearing). Retained 12/09 to 3/11.
`
`Tendler Cellular of Texas, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al.
`Retained by Baker-Botts as an expert on behalf of defendants AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al.
`Patents-in-suit are U.S. Patents 7,447,508; 7,305,243; 7,050,818; and 6,519,463. Case before the
`U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler), Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00115.
`Retained 8/09 to 7/10.
`
`Ambit Corporation v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., and Aircell LLC.
`Retained by Sidley Austin, LLP., as an expert on behalf of defendants Delta Airlines, Inc., and
`Aircell, LLC. Patent-in-suit is US patent 7,400,858. Case before the US District Court, District
`of Massachusetts, Boston, Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-10217-WGY. Deposed 12/4/09; Testified
`in Court: 12/7/09 (evidentiary hearing), 7/10 (jury trial). Retained 8/09 to 7/10.
`
`GPS Industries, Inc. and Optimal I.P. Holdings, L.P. v. Altex Corporation, et. al.
`Retained by Hitchcock-Evert as an expert on behalf of defendants Altex Corporation, Deca
`International Corporation, Golflogix, Inc. and L1 Technologies. Patent-in-suit is US patent
`5,364,093. Case before the US District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Civil
`Action No. 3-07-CV0831-K. Deposed 6/30/09. Retained 5/08 through 7/09.
`
`Satellite Tracking of People, LLC v. Omnilink Systems, Inc.
`Retained by DLA Piper as an expert on behalf of defendant Omnilink Systems, Inc.. Patent-in-
`suit is US patent RE39,909. Case before the US District Court, Eastern District of Texas,
`Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-116. 12/08 – 1/11.
`
`SiRF Technology, Inc. v. Global Locate, Inc.
`Retained by DLA Piper/WilmerHale as an expert on behalf of Global Locate. Patents-in-suit
`include US patents 6,304,216; 6,417,801; 6,606,346; 6,651,000; 6,704,651; 6,937,187;
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`7,043,363; 7,091,904; 7,132,980 and 7,158,080. Case before the US International Trade
`Commission, Washington D.C., in the matters of: “Certain GPS Devices and Products
`Containing Same,” Investigation number 337-TA-602 (Global Locate, plaintiff) and “Certain
`GPS Chips, Associated Software and Systems, and Products Containing Same,” Investigation
`number 337-TA-596 (SiRF Technologies, plaintiff). My work focused on the 7,043,363 and
`7,091,904 patents in defense of Global Locate/Broadcom from June 2007 through March 2008.
`Deposed 1/18-1/19/08; testified at trial 3/18-3/19/08.
`
`Intellectual Science and Technology
`Retained Dykema Gossett, PLCC as a technical expert on patent infringement issues related to
`“suspend-to-RAM” technologies in personal computers. Pre-litigation work.
`
`Intellectual Science and Technology, Inc., v. Sony, JVC and Panasonic
`Retained Dykema Gossett, PLCC as a technical expert on patent infringement issues related to
`US Patent 5,748,575, US Patent 6,222,799, US Patent 6,785,198, US Patent 6,662,239 and US
`Patent 6,717,890. Sony Electronics Inc., case number 2:06-CV-10406, JVC Americas Corp.,
`case number 2:06-CV-10409 and Panasonic Corporation of North America case number 2:06-
`CV-10412. Cases heard in United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern
`Division. Expert for Intellectual Science and Technology, Inc. Dec 2006 – 2008..
`
`Kirsch Technologies v. Xerox, Canon
`Retained Dykema Gossett, PLCC as an Expert Witness on patent infringement issues related to
`US Patent 4,816,911, Canon case number CA 00-72775, Xerox case number CA 00-72778, cases
`heard in United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division. Expert
`for Kirsch Technologies. Nov 2006 – 2008..
`
`American Video Graphics v. ATI Technologies
`Retained by Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Dallas, TX as a technical expert on patent
`infringement issues related to US Patents 5,132,670, 5,109,520, 5,084,830, 4,761,642, 4,742,474,
`4,734,690, 4,730,185 and 4,694,286. Hewlett-Packard Co., et al., defendants, case number CA
`6:04-CV-379-LED and Sony Corporation of America et al., defendants, case number CA 6:04-
`CV-399-LED. Cases heard in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler
`Division. Expert for ATI Technologies, intervener. Jan 2005 – Sep 2005.
`
`Microsoft v. EMC
`Dewey Ballantine, LLP, Washington, D.C., as a technical expert on patent infringement issues
`related to US Patents 5,588,147; 5,689,700; 6,393,466; 6,424,151; 6,490,594; and 6,632,248.
`Wrote a declaration on behalf of Microsoft. Oct 2004 – Jan 2005.
`
`Optimum Return v. Meier Brothers
`Retained by Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Dallas, TX as a technical expert on Copyright
`infringement allegations related to software owned by Optimum Return, LLC. Cyberkatz
`Consulting, Inc., Handsquare, LLC, Meier Brothers, et al., defendants, case number CA 3-
`03CV1064-D. Case heard in United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas
`Division. Expert for Meier Brothers. July 2004.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`Parental Guide of Texas, Inc. v. Funai Corp., et. al.
`Technical expert for defendants JVC and Panasonic in their dispute over non-infringement of US
`Patent number 4,605,964.
`
`Elonex I.P. Holdings, LTD. and Elonex PLC, Phase II
`Expert witness for defendants Chuntex, Acer, Tatung, Lite-On, Daewoo and Envision in their
`dispute with Elonex non-infringement and validity for US Patent numbers 5,389,952; 5,648,799;
`and 5,880,719.
`
`Storage Computer Corporation vs. Veritas Software
`Technical expert for the plaintiff in matters involving Patents US 5,257,367; US 5,893,919; and
`US 6,098,128.
`
`Storage Computer Corporation vs. Seagate Technology LLC
`Technical expert for the defendant in matters involving US Patent RE 34,100.
`
`Elonex I.P. Holdings, LTD. and Elonex PLC, vs. Packard Bell et. al., CA 98-689-GMS
`Expert witness for defendants ViewSonic Corp., Dell Computer Corporation, MAG Technology
`USA, Princeton Graphic Systems, Inc., Micron Electronics, Sony Electronics and Capetronic
`Computer USA in their dispute with Elonex non-infringement and validity for US Patent
`numbers 5,389,952; 5,648,799; and 5,880,719.
`
`1.4.2 Engineering Consulting
`
`
`Offspring Media Inc.
`Technical consultant for the development of real-time auralization algorithms for integration into
`a consumer electronics product. Sep 2004.
`
`Raytheon Company, Sudbury, MA
`Development of techniques and requirements for implementing a fault tolerant computer system
`using software implemented fault tolerance (SIFT) techniques on commercial off-the-shelf
`processing hardware. The resultant system is to be used for highly reliable radar data and signal
`processing.
`
`TVM Techno Venture Management
`Provided consulting services to assist in assessing the technical claims of a company pursuing
`venture capital investment for a hardware implemented RAID 5 system .
`
`Keyhold Engineering Inc., Northboro, MA.
`Development of a prototype system for automatically calibrating multiple channel audio systems.
`
`American Navigation Systems Inc., Milbury, MA.
`Consulting on the development of the hand-held personal navigation and mapping system.
`
`Lincoln Laboratory, Bedford, MA.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 36
`
`
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1005
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`
`

`
`Simulated, tested and evaluated a GPS integrity monitoring algorithm developed at Lincoln
`Laboratories.
`
`
`1.5 Licenses and Certifications
`
`1.5.1 Commercial Radio Operator
`
`General Radiotelephone Operator License
`Ship RADAR endorsement
`
`1.5.2 Amateur Radio Operator
`
`Amateur Extra class radio operator license.
`
`1.5.3 Diving Certifications
`
`PADI Open Water Diver (ISO 24801-2 Diver Level 2 – Autonomous Diver)
`
`2. Courses Taught at WPI
`
`2.1 Course Descriptions
`
`Short descriptions of the courses taught are as follows:
`
`EE572N Advanced System Architecture
`
`
`This course focuses on the architectural techniques used to achieve high-performance in
`SISD and SIMD computer systems. In this course the interaction between the software
`application and hardware architecture and the effect of this interaction on achievable
`performance is stressed. The course begins by covering the basic architectural tricks used to
`enhance system performance and ends with a series of case studies that analyze specific
`architectures such as the CRAY and CDC vector supercomputers, the MasPar, the Connection
`Machine, the ICL DAP, and others.
`
`ECE505 Computer Architecture
`
`
`This course is an introductory graduate course in computer architecture. Most aspects of
`CPU architecture are covered using a combined hardware/software approach. Specific topics
`include datapath design, memory systems, microprogramming, memory management, operating
`systems, and instruction set design.
`
`ECE579M Real-Time System Design
`
`
`This course focuses on the design of computer systems for which the timeliness of producing
`results is a critical factor for establishing the correctness of the system design. Topics covered
`include hardware specification, real-time operating systems and programming, scheduling,
`communications, and validation/verification. Issues and choices arising for single processor and

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket