throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.,
`Ericsson Inc., and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`TracBeam, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01708
`Patent 7,525,484 B2
`____________
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`Submitted Electronically via the Patent Review Processing System
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper No. 11),
`
`and the Petitioners’ and Patent Owner’s Stipulated Request to Amend the Schedule
`
`(Paper No. 12), T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., TeleCommunication
`
`Systems, Inc., Ericsson Inc., and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (collectively,
`
`“Petitioners”) hereby request oral argument. The Board has already scheduled oral
`
`argument for November 8, 2016. See Scheduling Order (Paper No. 11) at 5, 7; see
`
`also Nov. 2016 PTAB Public Hearing Schedule
`
`(Oct. 12, 2016),
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ptab_nov16_101216.pdf.
`
`Petitioners also request permission to use audio-visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstrative exhibits.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioners specify the following issues to
`
`be argued in this proceeding:
`
`ISSUES TO BE ARGUED
`
`A.
`
`The grounds on which the instant inter partes review proceeding was
`
`instituted, namely the unpatentability of Claim 1, over U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,936,572 to Loomis in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,748,226 B1 to
`
`Wortham.
`
`B. Any issues specified by Patent Owner in a request for oral argument.
`
`C.
`
`Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`Respectfully submitted,
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`Brian W. Oaks
`Reg. No. 44,981
`
`
`Date: October 17, 2016
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on the
`
`17th day of October, 2016, a complete and entire copy of this PETITIONER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 was
`
`served on Patent Owner via email at the following correspondence addresses:
`
`• sean@dovellaw.com
`
`• ssereboff@socalip.com
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
` October 17, 2016
`Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Brian W. Oaks (Reg. No., 44,981)
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`512.322.5407
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners, T-Mobile US,
`Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.,
`Telecommunication Systems, Inc., Ericsson
`Inc., and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson.
`
`1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket