throbber
SURVEY OF LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES
`
`TO SUPPORT MOBILE 9-
`
`Survey Conducted for State of California Department of General Services
`Telecommunications Division, Sacramento, California and for the Association of Public
`Safety Communications Officials (APCO)
`
`JULY, 1994
`
`\9 By
`
`l. DRISCOLL & ASSOCIATES
`
`2066 Dorado Drive
`Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90732
`Telephone: (310) 832-8834
`Fax:: (310) 832-3468
`
`All rights reserved No parts of this
`means without
`
`, under penalty of Federal copyright
`
`Notice of Liability: The
`without warranty.
`entity with respect to any liability, loss, or damage caused directly or indirectly by the
`use of this document or systems described within.
`
`As /s " basis
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 1
`
`

`
`. ...... .....
`
`..............................................
`:..........
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Section
`
`Page
`
`Introduction........................................................................................................... .
`
`Terminology................. .......
`
`Executive Summary...... ........ ............ .............. ................
`
`Observations and Conclusions....
`
`Network-Based Location Systems
`
`KSI, Inc.............................................................................................................
`Associated Communications
`Engineering Research Associates (E- Systems)........................................ .........
`TrackMobile.......................... ....
`S. West New Vector Group....... ...........
`Lockheed Sanders, Inc.................. .... .......
`Lattice Communications............ ......... .......................
`Cartesia Corporation.............. .......
`
`Network-Based Location Technologies
`
`Qualcomm, Inc............... ......
`ESL, Inc. (TR W)....................................................................................
`ArrayComm, Inc................ .............................
`OAR Corporation.............................................................................................
`Scientific Research Laboratories, Inc........ ............................................... ..........
`
`Systems Based on External Radiolocation Networks
`
`Terrapin Corporation.....................
`NA VSYS Corporation............................... ................................................. ......
`Smith Advanced Technology, Inc.................. ............ ................ ...... .................
`Galaxy Mocrosystems, Inc...............................................................................
`Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems..... ...........
`AirTouch Teletrac........
`Pinpoint Communications, Inc....................................................................
`Mobile Vision...... .......... ... ................
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 2
`
`

`
`l. DRISCOLL & ASSOCIATES
`
`c.J. Driscoll & Associates, based in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, provides consulting
`services on automatic vehicle location and mobile communications to fleets and industry
`suppliers. Clients include major cellular operating companies, Fortune 100 electronics
`manufacturers, venture capital start-up companies and government agencies.
`
`Clement Driscoll, principal of C.J. Driscoll & Associates, has over 15 years of experience
`in the fields of navigation, radiolocation and mobile communications. Mr. Driscoll
`fonnerly directed the marketing of Pac Tel Teletrac s fleet vehicle location system. He
`also served as Product Line Manager for Magnavox s commercial GPS and satellite
`communication products. Mr. Driscoll has conducted numerous proprietary studies for
`client companies and has written articles on vehicle location and mobile communications
`Automotive Fleet, GPS World
`magazines.
`
`for publications including
`
`and
`
`Communications
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 3
`
`

`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Purpose of the Study
`
`The purpose of this study is to identify location technologies which could be deployed to
`1 response organizations with the capability to locate a caller using a wireless
`provide 9-
`1 calls do not have caller
`phone to request emergency
`location information, precluding the intelligent routing of the call to the proper
`agency. Many wireless callers
`adds to their disorientation. This lack of information
`and delays the dispatch of the appropriate response agency.
`
`Scope of the Study
`
`This report identifies location systems and technologies which could be applied to mobile
`1. The author believes that the
`state of the technology, though it is unlikely that all
`1 callers have been covered. The study only covers systems developed by U.
`suppliers.
`
`As the purpose of this study is to address the feasibility of automatically locating mobile
`1 callers using cellular, PCS or ESMR networks, the study does not attempt to cover
`systems which utilize a vehicle mounted or handheld device other than a mobile phone to
`request police or medical assistance. However, it is appropriate to note that a number of
`companies are expected to offer systems in configurations other than mobile phones for
`requesting emergency assistance. It is anticipated that a number of vehicle-mounted
`systems will use GPS for location.
`
`Organization
`
`This report is divided into two sections. The first section covers systems which
`the location of the caller using signals transmitted over the network on which the call was
`placed. A number of
`systems require a modification to the software or hardware in the phone.
`covers several companies which have radiolocation technologies that could be applied to
`locating mobile 9-
`1 callers, but which are not currently developing a system targeted at
`this application.
`
`The second section covers location systems which rely on an external network or
`infrastructure to compute location. These systems either use an
`infrastucture to compute location or compute position based on a proprietary network of
`antennas deployed around a metropolitan area.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 4
`
`

`
`receiver module be embedded in the wireless phone or that an external module be
`interfaced to the phone. Some of these
`to compute location and one system makes use of the existing commercialFM radio
`infrastructure.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 5
`
`

`
`TERMINOLOGY
`
`A VM:
`which operate in the 902-928 MHz band and offer subscription-based vehicle location and
`data messaging services in metropolitan areas. See p. 55 for further
`
`CDMA:
`encoded and spread across a broad band of spectrum. Each transmission
`unique code and only be identified and retrieved by the designated receiver. This allows
`more calls to occupy the same space in a
`primary developer of CDMA technology for u~e
`is expected to become one of the standards for digital
`Communications Services (PCS) networks.
`
`CDPD: CDPD
`transmitting data files over idle channels of
`of cellular operating companies will implement this service on their networks beginning in
`1994.
`
`, which is a system for
`
`DOA:
`generally use multiple array antennas, which allow for calculation of the angle of arrival of
`signals ITom wireless phones. The
`point of lines of position based on DOA measurements at a minimum of two base stations.
`
`ESMR:
`subscription-based two-way radio networks. These
`, being deployed by
`companies such as Nextel Communications, will be targeted at both commercial fleet and
`consumer markets and will compete with cellular and PCS.
`
`GPS:
`deployed by the U.S. military, but widely used for commercial and civil
`GPS constellation consists of 24 satellites (21 primary satellites
`planes at an altitude of 10 900 nautical miles above the earth. The GPS satellites
`continuously transmit precisely timed signals which include information that enables GPS
`receivers to accurately determine the satellite s position in orbit. Since the
`the speed oflight, the amount of time that elapses from transmission to receipt
`satellite signal is easily converted by the receiver to the range or distance to the satellite.
`Range measurements to four or more satellites are
`compute location, but three satellites are sufficient if the altitude of the receiver above sea
`level is fairly constant. For security reasons, GPS accuracy is intentionally degraded by
`the U.S. government to 100
`50 meters.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 6
`
`

`
`, Scientific, Medical band. The 902-928 MHz
`ISM: Acronym
`band is often referred to as the ISM band, as the Federal Communications Commission
`authorizes certain types of equipment in these categories (including welding,
`diathermy, etc. ) to operate in this band. This band is
`Monitoring (A VM) systems, government users, automatic vehicle identification systems
`unlicensed users employing low-powered spread spectrum equipment (part 15 of FCC
`rules) and amateur users.
`
`IVHS:
`initiative to encourage technology developments to improve the flow of traffic on U.S.
`roads and highways. IVHS technologies include Automatic
`to advise drivers of traffic congestion and alternate routes, Automatic Traffic Management.
`Systems for improved municipal traffic flow management and other technologies.
`hoped that these technologies will reduce traffic delays, reduce pollution and increase
`safety.
`
`MTSO:
`switch that controls the cellular network.
`
`, one of them being a path
`Multipath: Reception
`directly ITom the transmitter, the others being paths caused by signal reflections from
`objects.
`
`PCS: Acronym for
`services which will let users make calls using low cost, lightweight pocket phones. PCS
`systems will be basedon micro cells, typically spaced every few blocks. Many PCS
`networks will operate in the 1.8 GHz band.
`
`Spread Spectrum: A method of
`over a much wider bandwidth than it would occupy with normal modulation.
`
`TDOA:
`Difference-of-Arrival. This technique is
`radiolocation systems. It involves
`the signal at different receivers (base stations).
`vehicle traveling in a manner that maintains a constant time-of-arrival difference between
`any pair of base station receivers is a hyperbola. The transmitter (e.g. cellular phone) is
`located at the point of intersection of three hyperbolas based on time of arrival difference
`measurements at three base stations.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 7
`
`

`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`
`SUMMARY OF LOCATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR
`MOBILE 9-
`
`Network-based Location Systems
`
`KSI, Inc. has developed and patented
`(DFLS) which computes the location of a wireless phone by measuring the angle of
`arrival of control or voice channel transmissions
`measure angle of arrival at base stations with typical accuracy of .3 degrees, resulting
`in location accuracy of approximately 150 ft.
`$30 000 per site for a basic system and $3-5 million per network. The
`working on an Enhanced Direction Finding System (EDFS) with a target cost
`than $30 000 per site.
`
`Associated Communications Corporation has
`which computes the location of the caller using Time-Difference-of-Arrival (TDOA)
`measurements on control channel transmissions from the phone.
`typical accuracy of 500 ft. or better, based on tests and demonstrations conducted on a
`Rochester, New York cellular network. This patented system will be ready
`commercial deployment within 18 months through alliances with wireless network
`operators.
`
`Engineering Research Associates
`Systems, has developed
`and patented the E-CAPS system which computes the location of a wireless phone
`using a combination of phase-based direction finding and TDOA techniques.
`claims that location accuracy ofE-CAPS is approximately 100 meters. E-CAPS
`performance will be evaluated in a Federal Highway Administration sponsored
`operational test to be conducted in Washington, D.
`, beginning in October, 1994.
`
`TrackMobile, Inc. has
`caller using signal strength measurements of control channel transmissions from A and
`B side cellular base stations. The signal strength measurements are transmitted from
`the phone to TrackMobile s Help Express Service Center where the caller s location is
`computed and passed to the responsible PSAP.
`accuracy of 500 ft. A portable
`the phone to determine its exact location. The TrackMobile system requires a
`modification to the software in the wireless phone, but no modification to the network.
`
`S. West New Vector Group is
`a wireless network. The system
`compute location. Simulation
`tests of the system are currently underway. This system requires the addition of an
`
`Arrival multilateration techniques to
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 8
`
`

`
`integrated circuit and software in the phone (estimated cost of $3) and a network
`overlay which may be achievable at a cost of $1/2 million for a typical network.
`
`Lockheed Sanders, Inc. has
`states is suitable for use in a high multi path urban environment.
`the installation of a receiver and processor at cell sites.
`technique is used to compute the approximate location of the caller.
`device is used in close range to determine the exact location
`company expects the system to be ready for commercial deployment in 1995.
`
`Lattice Corporation is a
`wireless network callers based on an overlay to the wireless network.
`reports that the system is designed to be low cost and to be effective in
`, the company does not wish to discuss
`effects of multi path propagation.
`the technique used to compute location except under non-disclosure. It is
`that the system will be available for commercial deployment in 1996.
`
`Cartesia Corporation will be
`wireless callers which receives and processes control channel transmissions installed at
`The system is not yet patented and the technique for
`computing location was not disclosed. The company will conduct field trails
`second half of 1994 to determine system accuracy.
`
`each network cell
`
`site.
`
`Network-based Location Technologies
`
`Qualcomm, Inc. reports that its Code
`for wireless networks could be used to compute the location of the caller.
`company reports that precise time is available at CDMA base stations, and the spread
`spectrum transmissions are very similar to GPS. However, when a CDMA phone
`approaches a base station it becomes difficult to obtain an adequate signal-to-noise
`ratio on neighboring base stations, as necessary for triangulation. Qualcomm reports
`that there are several possible solutions to this problem, but limited work has been
`done in this area to date, as there has been little customer interest.
`
`ESL, Inc., a subsidiary ofTRW, reports that based on the company s extensive
`experience in the development of radiolocation products, they believe there are enough
`mature technologies in the marketplace that a practical and affordable wireless 9-
`1 location, the company recommends the
`system is well within reach.
`based location system
`use ofGPS
`incorporating direction finding and TDOA technology.
`GPS receivers be installed in mobile phones will bring the cost
`to a few dollars per unit. A cellular-based location system based on DF and TDOA
`could achieve accuracies of 100-300 ft.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 9
`
`

`
`ArrayComm, Inc. has
`communication quality and capacity, using Spatial Division Multiple Access (SDMA)
`technology. The company reports that
`ITom a mobile phone is fundamental to their technology.
`information would reportedly make it possible to compute the location
`with an accuracy of +/- 50 ft. in open areas and with a lesser degree of accuracy in
`dense urban environments.
`
`OAR Corporation
`locating mobile callers. The company reports that an antenna array, bearing processor
`and receiver could be installed at a cell site for $10 000 or less, yielding bearing
`accuracy of approximately 3 degrees. In an urban environment, typical location
`accuracy would be within a city block.
`
`Scientific Research Laboratories, Inc. has
`which is used to identify the location of interfering emitters in the cellular band and
`locations of high system usage. An antenna array and receiver/processor installed at
`cell sites yield a typical bearing accuracy of3-5 degrees, resulting in location accuracy
`direction finding unit is used to
`of approximately 500 ft.
`determine the exact location of the caller. The cost
`estimated at $7 500 per site.
`
`Systems Based on External Location Network
`
`, which computes the
`
`Terrapin Corporation is
`location of the caller by tracking signals
`patented PINS system measures the phase of the FM pilot tone
`stations and, based on these measurements, computes the range or distance to each
`transmitter. Location of the caller
`typical system accuracy is 20-30 meters. Terrapin plans to have PINS
`embedd~d in wireless phones at an estimated cost
`claims that FM signals provide a high level of in-building penetration.
`
`NA VSYS Corporation
`the caller s location using a modified GPS receiver and modem interfaced to a mobile
`phone. The TIDGET receiver "takes a snapshot" of the captured GPS signals
`transmits the data to the NA VSYS Operations Center where location is computed.
`The caller s location is passed to the responsible PSAP. Typical accuracy
`TIDGET Mayday System is 100 meters.
`drop to under $50 within one year for large quantity purchases.
`
`Smith Advanced Technology, Inc. offers
`1 location
`and related applications. RALI units incorporate a GPS receiver, micro controller and
`software. The
`cellular phones will be available in late 1994 at an estimated price
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 10
`
`

`
`expects RALI units to be embedded in mobile phones within a year at an incremental
`cost of under $100. The company
`the RALI system into the PSAP' s operations.
`
`Galaxy Microsystems, Inc. has
`location based on transmissions
`metropolitan area. Galaxy receivers, which could be embedded in a wireless phone
`compute location based on Time-Difference-of-Arrival (TDOA) measurements.
`System accuracy is reported to be 10 meters or better.
`location network can be deployed around a metropolitan area for approximately
`$200 000. It is
`phones could be made available in large quantities for $15-$25.
`
`928 MHz band
`Automatic Vehicle Monitoring (A VM)
`can compute the location of users in system coverage areas with a typical accuracy of
`100- 150 feet or better. These systems use spread
`base stations and compute location at a network control center using Time-Difference-
`, though some
`of-Arrival measurements. Transceivers are typically
`companies are working on portable configurations. Current transceiver prices are on
`band networks include
`the order of $300. Current
`AirTouch Teletrac, Pinpoint Communications, Inc. , Southwestern Bell Mobile
`Systems and Mobile Vision, Inc. Only
`today, with network coverage in six cities.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 11
`
`

`
`OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
`
`Based on this survey, it is clear that the technology exists to locate callers using
`wireless phones to request 9- 1 emergency assistance. Effective location systems
`based on either an overlay to the wireless network or external radiolocation networks
`can be operational in the next 12-24 months iflocation system developers, wireless
`network operators and phone
`systems.
`
`A number of companies have developed location systems based on an overlay to an
`existing wireless network. Most
`add-on to the mobile phone and, therefore, could automatically locate callers using
`existing cellular phones.
`
`The best accuracy achievable with network-based location systems appears to be on
`the order of 100-300 ft. , with degraded accuracy in dense urban environments.
`network-based systems do not work well indoors, as the strength of the transmitted
`signals used to compute location is reduced as the signals pass through the building
`structure.
`responder to determine the exact location of the phone.
`
`The cost of network-based systems ranges ITom under $10 000 per base station to
`$30 000-$40 000 per base station or more. The deployment cost for a metropolitan
`area will typically range from under $1 million to $5 million or more.
`higher cost systems claim a higher level of accuracy.
`
`1 callers which use signals from
`Several suppliers offer systems capable of locating 9-
`existing networks without requiring an investment in inftastructure or network
`overlays. These systems are based on
`from commercial FM radio stations or currently available cellular transmissions.
`of these systems will reportedly add little or no cost to a basic wireless phone.
`systems offer varying degrees of accuracy and in-building penetration.
`
`1 systems based on GPS are currently in the form of external receivers
`Mobile 9-
`interfaced to a mobile phone. In the future, some suppliers expect to have GPS
`receivers embedded in the phone. Industry sources project that
`cellular phones were equipped with GPS, the price of GPS receivers would be reduced
`to a few dollars per phone. GPS
`or better, but GPS signal shadowing can occur in dense urban environments and the
`signals are not available indoors. On the whole, GPS is well suited for in-vehicle 9-
`location, but it would need to be used in combination with other technologies to cover
`in-building emergency calls from portable cellular or PCS phones.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 12
`
`

`
`Many of the systems which have been developed provide for location of a mobile
`caller, but not for passing location data and caller ill
`1 location data
`format compatible with existing PSAPs. Integration
`into the PSAP in a standard format is a significant issue which should be dealt with in
`parallel with any implementation of location systems.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 13
`
`

`
`NETWORK-BASED LOCATION SYSTEMS
`
`This section covers location systems which utilize the wireless communication network to
`compute the location of a mobile caller. Most systems covered require a modification to
`the network. Some
`in development) by the following companies are covered:
`
`KSI, Inc.
`
`Associated Communications Corporation
`
`Engineering Research Associates (E-Systems)
`
`TrackMobile
`
`S. West New Vector Group, Inc.
`
`Lockheed Sanders, Inc.
`
`Lattice Communications, Inc.
`
`Cartesia Corporation
`
`Several other companies have technologies which could be enhanced to provide the
`1 caller using a wireless network.
`capability to locate a 9-
`would require an overlay to the existing wireless network.
`location technology as it would be applied to locating mobile callers is included for the
`following companies:
`
`Qualcomm (CDMA)
`
`TRW (ESL)
`
`ArrayComm
`
`OAR Corporation
`
`Scientific Research Laboratories, Inc.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 14
`
`

`
`KSI, Inc.
`7630 Little River Turnpike, #212
`Annandale, VA 22003
`Telephone: (703) 941-5749
`Fax:: (703) 941-5786
`
`Company Background
`
`KSI, Inc. is a small, privately-held company which was formed in 1986.
`provided analytical, systems and software engineering support to the government and to
`commercial clients. In addition to the development of cellular location technology, KSI
`has designed and integrated sonar systems for the U. S. Navy and has also supported the
`Navy in the areas of advanced signal processing; detection, localization and tracking;
`analysis of acoustic and RF signal sources;
`data fusion and artificial intelligence.
`
`Direction Finding Localization System
`
`KSI began development of its Direction Finding Localization system (DFLS) in
`The system was designed to compute the location, speed and heading of users of wireless
`phones. A prototype DFLS
`
`The DFLS system requires the installation of directionally sensitive receiving antennas
`called Sensor Stations (SSs) which may be collocated at the wireless network antenna
`sites. SSs capture
`these signals to determine the angle of arrival.
`relayed via a wired or wireless data link to a Central Station
`received data and computes the location of the caller.
`1 applications, DFLS can
`provide the caller s phone number and location to a Public Safety Answering Point
`(pSAP).
`
`1 applications, DFLS can reportedly compute the caller s location in milliseconds
`For 9-
`before voice communication begins. KSI reports
`1 callers as can access the communication network.
`the location of as many 9-
`company reports that the system is compatible with wireless networks such as cellular
`PCS and ESMR. The
`
`Target Applications
`
`Intended applications for DFLS include emergency' notification (9-
`assistance, routing, and fleet management. .
`information for traffic monitoring in support of IVHS Advanced Traffic Management
`Systems.
`
`1), roadside
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 15
`
`

`
`System Status
`
`A demonstration DFLS system consisting of two SS units and one CS has been
`operational in the Annandale, Virginia, area since 1991. The company reports that a
`significant amount of field testing has been done tracking a company control group as well
`as thousands of targets of opportunity.
`
`KSI reports that the DFLS system could be
`sufficient funding is available.
`
`, if
`
`Wireless Phone
`
`DFLS does not require any modification to the wireless phone. Once deployed, the
`system will compute location of existing cellular phones as well as phones operated on
`future cellular and PCS networks.
`
`System Accuracy
`
`KSI claims typical location accuracy of 150 feet. This accuracy is based on the system
`capability to compute bearing to the SS with an accuracy of 0. 3 degrees. Accuracy
`achieved is impacted by the proximity of the phone to SS receivers, noise and the
`multipath environment. A higher
`measurements from more than two sites.
`
`Performance in Dense Urban Environments
`
`Accuracy in dense urban environments may be degraded due to increased effects of
`multipath. Performance in dense urban environments can be
`of additional SS units, which need not be located at network antenna sites.
`
`In-Building Penetration and Vertical Resolution
`
`DFSL will provide only limited in-building penetration due to the signal strength reduction
`caused by the structure. If
`communications within the building, the KSI system will identify the building
`the call was placed and, based on measurements from the microcell, may be able to
`determine ITom which floor a call was placed.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 16
`
`

`
`Proiected Cost of Deployment
`
`KSI estimates the cost of deployment for a basic system at approximately $30 000 per SS
`including one CS, which can generally cover a metropolitan area. The estimated cost to
`deploy DFLS on a wireless network in a major metropolitan area is $3- 5 million.
`
`KSI is currently developing an Enhanced Direction Finding System (EDFS) which could
`be deployed at a cost of under $30 000 per SS, depending on capabilities required, system
`complexity and the number of network sites.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 17
`
`

`
`Associated Communications Corporation
`3 Bala Plaza East, Suite 502
`Bala Cynwyd, P A 19004
`Telephone: (610) 660-4910
`Fax:: (610) 660-4920
`
`Company Background
`
`Associated Communications Corporation commenced operations in November, 1979.
`The company has holdings in a number of communications companies and also actively
`operates communications businesses. Associated owns and operates cellular and
`microwave systems and has significant holdings in cable TV networks.
`the majority owner of cellular networks in Buffalo, Rochester and Albany, New York and
`other locations. Associated has entered into a
`Southwestern Bell with regard to these cellular properties which is expected to lead to the
`sale of these holdings later this year. The company owns 30% interest in Portatel del
`Sureste , S. A. de C. v. , which provides cellular telephone service in five Mexican states.
`Associated, through a joint venture, has experimental licenses ITom the FCC to test
`Personal Communications Services technology in Los Angeles and Washington, D. C. and
`has purchased interest in an entity pursuing PCS licenses. Associated Communications
`Corporation is listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange.
`
`Associated began development of its Cellular Location System in early 1992.
`company currently has a staff of engineers (internal staff and consultants) dedicated to
`development and testing of the system.
`
`Cellular Location System
`
`Associated Communication Corporation s Cellular Location system computes the
`location, speed and heading of callers using wireless phones. The system is based on
`Time-Difference-of-Arrival (TDOA) measurements made on the reverse control channel
`transmissions ITom phone to cell site.
`
`The Cellular Location System requires that equipment be installed at "coverage" cell sites
`but not at "capacity" cell sites. (Capacity sites are sites that have been added to cover
`increases in network usage. ) In a
`s cellular
`network cell sites are "coverage" sites. Equipment
`omnidirectional antenna (unless one is already in use) and a dedicated receiver which has a
`wider bandwidth, better timing and higher sensitivity than the cellular network receiver.
`To compute location the receiver measures the time of arrival of the center of energy
`(otherwise known as Group Delay) of the 100 millisecond control
`The data from the cell sites is passed to a digital signal processing system at a Central Site
`(typically at the MTSO) which computes location based on the intersection ofisodelay
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 18
`
`

`
`curves generated from the TDOA measurements.
`real time after receipt of control channel
`
`s location is computed in
`
`On July 5, 1994, U.S. Patent #5 327 144 covering the Cellular Location System was
`issued to Associated RT, Inc., a subsidiary of Associated Communications Corporation.
`
`Target Applications
`
`Intended applications for the Cellular Location System include emergency notification
`(9-
`1) as well as a wide range of consumer and commercial fleet applications.
`
`System Status
`
`Associated' s Cellular Location System was demonstrated over a six month period (late
`1993/early 1994) in the Rochester, New York area, using the company s local cellular
`network. Demonstrations were conducted for
`national organizations seeking to market location-dependent services. Limited field
`testing was also done at that time, but test data has not been published.
`
`Associated Communications estimates that in 18-24 months the location system can be
`commercially deployed and integrated into existing 9- 1 operations. The company is
`actively pursuing partnerships and alliances to commercialize the location technology and
`to participate in further technology enhancement and development.
`
`Wireless Phone
`
`The Associated Communications system does not require any modification to cellular or
`other wireless phones. Once deployed the
`users of the network as well as new users.
`
`System Accuracy
`
`Associated Communications claims typical system accuracy of 500 ft. RMS, under a
`variety of conditions, with its prototype Cellular Location System.
`
`Accuracy in dense urban environments may be degraded due to multipath. However
`some of the impact of multi path is offset by the fact that dense urban areas usually have
`more cell sites, making it possible obtain a more redundant solution.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 19
`
`

`
`In-Building Penetration and Vertical Resolution
`
`Associated Communications reports that their location system works indoors, but
`accuracy is impacted by multipath and signal loss. The company indicates that it is
`difficult to determine which floor of the building the caller is on with a cellular-based
`location system, as the location network is essentially on the horizontal plane.
`
`Proiected Cost of Deployment
`
`Associated Communications declined to discuss system deployment costs in detail.
`However, they indicated that the cost will be less than the cost for Cellular Digital Packet
`Data (CDPD) network overlay, which
`000- $50 000 per cell site.
`CDPD requires a receiver, a transmitter and a linear amplifier while the Associated
`location system requires only a receiver and, in some cases, an antenna.
`
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson EXHIBIT 1016
`T-Mobile / TCS / Ericsson v. TracBeam
`Page 20
`
`

`
`Engineering Research Associates
`1 ?95
`Vienna, VA 22182-2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket