`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`· · · · · ·IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`· · · · · · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`·
`· · ·HNI CORPORATION and· · · · · · *
`· · ·ALLSTEEL INC.,· · · · · · · · ·*
`· · · · · · · · Petitioners,· · · · *Case No. IPR2015-01691
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · *
`· · ·VS.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · *Patent No. 8,024,901
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · *
`· · ·DIRTT ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS· *Issue Date:· September 27, 2011
`· · ·LTD.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·*
`· · · · · · · ·Patent Owner.· · · · *
`·
`
`· · · · · · · Title:· INTEGRATED RECONFIGURABLE WALL SYSTEM
`
`· · ·---------------------------------------------------------------
`
`· · · · · · ·ORAL DEPOSITION OF JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · NOVEMBER 12, 2018
`
`· · ·---------------------------------------------------------------
`
`· · · · · ·ORAL DEPOSITION of JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D., produced
`
`· · ·as a witness at the instance of the Patent Owner and duly
`
`· · ·sworn, was taken in the above-styled and numbered cause on
`
`· · ·November 12, 2018, from 9:00 a.m. to 10:44 a.m., before
`
`· · ·Sherri K. Williamson, Notary Public in and for the State of
`
`· · ·Texas, reported by method of machine shorthand at the offices
`
`· · ·of U.S. Legal Support, 701 Brazos, Suite 380, Austin, Travis
`
`· · ·County, Texas 78701, pursuant to the provisions stated on the
`
`· · ·record or attached hereto.
`
`· · · · · ·It is stipulated and agreed by and between Counsel and
`
`· · ·the respective parties hereto that the Deposition of the
`
`· · ·Witness named in the caption hereto may be taken at this time
`
`· · ·and place, pursuant to Notice, and that the said deposition or
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-001
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-002
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`2
`
`·1· ·any part thereof, when so taken, may be used on the trial of
`
`·2· ·this case the same as if the Witness were present in court,
`
`·3· ·testifying in person.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·* * * * * *
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-003
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`3
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · ·A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`·2· ·FOR THE PETITIONERS:
`· · · · · ·FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS
`·3· · · · ·2200 Wells Fargo Center
`· · · · · ·90 S. Seventh St.
`·4· · · · ·Minneapolis, MN 55402
`· · · · · ·timothy.sullivan@faegrebd.com
`·5· · · · ·BY:· MR. TIMOTHY SULLIVAN
`
`·6· ·FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`· · · · · ·WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`·7· · · · ·60 East South Temple St., Suite 1000
`· · · · · ·Salt Lake City, UT 84111
`·8· · · · ·Tel.: (801)533-9800 Fax: (801)328-1707
`· · · · · ·cnydegger@wnlaw.com
`·9· · · · ·BY:· MR. CHAD E. NYDEGGER
`
`10· · · · ·JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.,
`· · · · · · · · The Witness;
`11
`
`12· · · · ·SHERRI K. WILLIAMSON,
`· · · · · · · · Notary Public
`13· · · · · · · in and for the State of Texas
`
`14· · · · · · · · · · · · * * * * * *
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-004
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`4
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I N D E X
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`·3· ·STIPULATIONS.................................................1
`· · ·APPEARANCES..................................................3
`·4
`
`08:28
`
`·5· ·EXAMINATION· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`08:28
`
`·6· ·JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.
`
`08:28
`
`·7· ·Examination by Mr. Nydegger· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 5
`
`08:28
`
`·8· ·Examination by Mr. Sullivan· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·54
`
`08:28
`
`·9· ·Examination by Mr. Nydegger· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·56
`
`08:28
`
`10
`
`08:28
`
`11· ·EXHIBITS· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`12· ·1038· · (Previously marked) Supplemental Declaration of
`· · · · · · · Joseph J. Beaman, Jr.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·7
`13
`
`08:28
`
`14· ·1003· · (Previously marked) U.S. Patent - Raith et al.· · · ·9
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`15· ·1018· · (Previously marked) Expert Declaration of
`· · · · · · · Joseph J. Beaman, Jr.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 16
`16
`
`17· ·1006· · U.S. Patent Application Publication -
`· · · · · · ·MacGregor et al.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 41
`18
`
`08:28
`
`19· ·1004· · (Previously marked) EVH patent documents· · · · · · 58
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`20· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`21· ·SIGNATURE AND CHANGES.......................................60
`· · ·REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE......................................61
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-005
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`5
`
`08:58
`
`08:58
`
`08:58
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.,
`
`·2· · · · ·having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
`
`·4· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Good morning, Dr. Beaman.
`
`·5· · · · A· · Good morning.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · Could you please state your name for the record.
`
`·7· · · · A· · Joseph J. Beaman.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Thank you.· And could you also please provide your
`
`·9· ·address?
`
`10· · · · A· · 700 Texas Avenue, Austin, Texas.
`
`11· · · · Q· · And, Dr. Beaman, I know that you've been deposed a
`
`12· ·number of times before, but I'm just going to go over a few
`
`13· ·quick ground rules, just as reminders for you and for me.
`
`14· ·Okay?
`
`15· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`16· · · · Q· · So as you know, I'll be asking you questions, and
`
`17· ·Sherri here will be taking down everything that we say.· And so
`
`18· ·to make her job easier and to have a clear record, if we can
`
`19· ·remember not to talk over each other, then that will really
`
`20· ·facilitate us getting through the deposition smoothly.· Is that
`
`21· ·amenable to you?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes, it is.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Perfect.· And if you don't understand a question,
`
`24· ·feel free to ask me to rephrase it or just let me know that you
`
`25· ·don't understand it, and I'll do my best to rephrase it in a
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-006
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`6
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`·1· ·different way that you can understand so that the record will
`
`·2· ·reflect that if you answer a question, you're answering the
`
`·3· ·question that I ask, not a different understanding or a
`
`·4· ·different question.· Do you understand that?
`
`·5· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · And, also, if you could listen to the questions
`
`·7· ·carefully and provide the answer that's asked.· So, for
`
`·8· ·example, if I ask for a "yes" or "no" question, if you could
`
`·9· ·limit your answer to a "yes" or "no" answer, I would appreciate
`
`10· ·that.· And then if there's further explanation that I would
`
`11· ·like or that your counsel would like, then we'll ask you for
`
`12· ·that further explanation.· Do you understand that?
`
`13· · · · A· · Not completely.· Does that mean he can ask me
`
`14· ·questions in the middle of this?
`
`15· · · · Q· · Not in the middle, but he'll get his turn.
`
`16· · · · A· · Okay.
`
`17· · · · Q· · He'll be taking notes, and he'll go back and he'll
`
`18· ·ask you additional questions to clarify where he thinks it's
`
`19· ·necessary.· Okay?
`
`20· · · · · · · · · And if I ask a "yes" or "no" question and you
`
`21· ·can't give a "yes" or "no" answer because it's probably a
`
`22· ·poorly worded question on my part, just let me know.· Say, "I
`
`23· ·can't answer that question with a 'yes' or 'no' answer," and
`
`24· ·then we can proceed from there.· Okay?
`
`25· · · · A· · Okay.
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-007
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`7
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:04
`
`·1· · · · Q· · All right.· Also, as you know from being deposed,
`
`·2· ·your counsel here will, at times, state objections for the
`
`·3· ·record; however, unless he specifically instructs you not to
`
`·4· ·answer a question, then you go ahead and answer the question
`
`·5· ·after he's lodged his objection.· Do you understand that?
`
`·6· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Okay.· And, last, whereas you are now under oath, I'm
`
`·8· ·entitled to discover any communications that you have until the
`
`·9· ·deposition is closed, and that includes correspondence with
`
`10· ·Mr. Sullivan during breaks or during lunch or anything like
`
`11· ·that because you're under oath from now until the deposition
`
`12· ·concludes.· Do you understand that?
`
`13· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Okay.· Well, with that, let's dive in.
`
`15· · · · · · · · · Dr. Beaman, I am handing you an exhibit that was
`
`16· ·previously marked as Exhibit 1038.
`
`17· · · · · · · · (Exhibit No. 1038 previously marked)
`
`18· · · · Q· · (BY MR. SULLIVAN) Dr. Beaman, do you recognize this
`
`19· ·as the supplemental declaration that you have submitted in the
`
`20· ·IPR2015-01691?
`
`21· · · · A· · Yes, I do recognize it.
`
`22· · · · Q· · And that's your signature on the last page?
`
`23· · · · A· · Yes, it is.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Okay.· If you would turn to Paragraph 3, please.· And
`
`25· ·in the second-to-last sentence in that paragraph, you state,
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-008
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`8
`
`·1· ·quote, "My specific opinions on how the relevant prior art
`
`·2· ·combinations teach each element of the newly instituted claims
`
`·3· ·remain unchanged and I do not intend, through this report, to
`
`·4· ·add to or change my previously disclosed opinions," closed
`
`·5· ·quote.· Do you see that?
`
`·6· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · And is it correct that in that sentence you're
`
`·8· ·stating that you're not adding to or changing the opinions that
`
`·9· ·you rendered in your original declaration submitted in this
`
`10· ·IPR?
`
`11· · · · A· · I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`12· · · · Q· · Okay.· Dr. Beaman, are you familiar with the
`
`13· ·manufacturing process of extrusion?
`
`14· · · · A· · Yes, I am.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Are you familiar with the manufacturing process using
`
`16· ·roll forming?
`
`17· · · · A· · Yes, I am.
`
`18· · · · Q· · And are there parts that could be manufactured using
`
`19· ·one of those processes, but not the other?
`
`20· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`21· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· There are parts, yeah, that it
`
`22· ·would be much easier to do one method other than the other one,
`
`23· ·yes.
`
`24· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) So there are instances in which it
`
`25· ·would be -- a person of skill in the art of the 901 patent
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-009
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`9
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`·1· ·would view manufacturing one type of part -- or one part as
`
`·2· ·impractical using one or the other methods; is that correct?
`
`·3· · · · A· · Maybe not economic.· You probably -- maybe could do
`
`·4· ·it, but you may not want to do it.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Would it be -- Are there -- Can you think of any
`
`·6· ·parts that could not be manufactured using either roll forming
`
`·7· ·or extrusion?
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · Let me rephrase that.· Can you think of any
`
`·9· ·parts that could be manufactured using either roll forming or
`
`10· ·extrusion, but not the other manufacturing process?
`
`11· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`12· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yes, I could.· Yeah.
`
`13· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So not all parts can be
`
`14· ·manufactured using both processes; correct?
`
`15· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`16· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yeah.· You could extrude at an
`
`17· ·intern hole, but you couldn't really -- would be very difficult
`
`18· ·to roll form.· I guess you could close it over, but it would be
`
`19· ·difficult.
`
`20· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· Can you think of any
`
`21· ·parts -- Well, strike that.
`
`22· · · · · · · · (Exhibit No. 1003 previously marked)
`
`23· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Dr. Beaman, I'm handing you what
`
`24· ·has been previously marked as Exhibit 1003.
`
`25· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-010
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`10
`
`·1· · · · Q· · Do you recognize this as the prior art reference we
`
`·2· ·commonly have referred to as the Raith reference in this IPR?
`
`·3· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · MR. NYDEGGER:· That's R-A-I-T-H.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) And if you turn to Figures 1
`
`·6· ·through 5 --
`
`·7· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · -- these are the solid panels of Raith; correct?
`
`·9· · · · A· · Yes.· I mean, they're part of them, sure.
`
`10· · · · Q· · In fact, Figures 1 through 5 are just different views
`
`11· ·of the same part in different configurations; correct?
`
`12· · · · A· · Figure 1 is -- I have to read the patent again for
`
`13· ·Figure 1.· (Reviewing document) Yeah.· So Figure 1 is prior to
`
`14· ·being formed and then Figure 3, I'm sure, is after forming.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Okay.· And then Figure 4 is just a side view, and
`
`16· ·then Figure 5 shows two of those panels that have been formed
`
`17· ·clipped together; correct?
`
`18· · · · A· · I don't think so.· Figure 5 is --
`
`19· · · · Q· · Maybe I can --
`
`20· · · · A· · It's a broken perspective -- oh, "employing two face
`
`21· ·plates," yeah, so -- Okay.· Right.
`
`22· · · · Q· · So we have the -- I believe it's Face Plate 11, and
`
`23· ·you can see that there's Face Plate 11 in Figures 1 through 5.
`
`24· ·Can you see that?
`
`25· · · · A· · Face Plate 11?· I'm sorry.· I don't see it yet.· Oh,
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-011
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`11
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`·1· ·here.· No, no.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · (Indicating)
`
`·3· · · · A· · Yeah.· Yes.· Okay.
`
`·4· · · · Q· · (Indicating)
`
`·5· · · · A· · And there, yes.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · And then -- (Indicating)
`
`·7· · · · A· · And then 11 there, yes, and 11, right, yes
`
`·8· ·(Indicating).
`
`·9· · · · Q· · And so --
`
`10· · · · A· · And the two sides of it, yes.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Okay.· So we're in agreement that Face Plate 11 is
`
`12· ·shown in different states of manufacturing and in different
`
`13· ·configurations in Figures 1 through 5; correct?
`
`14· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Okay.· Great.
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Thank you.· And would it be practical to manufacture
`
`18· ·the -- Well, let me step back.
`
`19· · · · · · · · · The Face Plate 11, that's intended to be a
`
`20· ·floor-to-ceiling solid panel in a reconfigurable wall; is that
`
`21· ·correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · I don't remember it goes all the way to the ceiling,
`
`23· ·but it's certainly a panel in a reconfigurable wall.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Okay.· Do you want to turn to Figure 13?
`
`25· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-012
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`12
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`·1· · · · Q· · And towards the right-hand side, do you see
`
`·2· ·Panel 266, for example?
`
`·3· · · · A· · I will in a minute here.· (Reviewing document) 266,
`
`·4· ·yes.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · And that's a solid panel that goes from the floor to
`
`·6· ·the ceiling; correct?
`
`·7· · · · A· · It appears to.· I mean, there's some trim and there's
`
`·8· ·some things up above which appear to be the ceiling, yes.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · And that's a panel manufactured using the solid
`
`10· ·Face Plate 11 that we looked at in Figures 1 through 5;
`
`11· ·correct?
`
`12· · · · A· · It probably doesn't go and state that, but that would
`
`13· ·be the inference, I believe.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Okay.· So do you agree that these panels could be
`
`15· ·floor-to-ceiling panels, these Face Plate 11?
`
`16· · · · A· · They could be, yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Okay.· And would it be practical to manufacture those
`
`18· ·panels -- solid panels with an extrusion process?
`
`19· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`20· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· The whole panel itself?
`
`21· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Yes.· Well, Panel 11 is a --
`
`22· ·Face Plate 11 is one singular piece; correct?
`
`23· · · · A· · Yes, it is.
`
`24· · · · Q· · And so would it be practical to manufacture that
`
`25· ·using an extrusion process?
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-013
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`13
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I'm not sure you'd want to do the
`
`·3· ·whole panel, but you can certainly do the side parts of it with
`
`·4· ·extrusion and attach it to it.· So, yeah you could -- by
`
`·5· ·assembly, you could, but whether you do it -- do a -- This has
`
`·6· ·been set up for roll forming, which is off of one plate.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· And so going back to my
`
`·8· ·question -- It's not quite clear to me what your answer is.
`
`·9· ·Would it be practical, from a manufacturing perspective, to
`
`10· ·manufacture these Face Plate 11 parts using an extrusion
`
`11· ·process?
`
`12· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Well, I could have the plates and
`
`14· ·the -- and extrude out the side pieces.· Yes, I could do that.
`
`15· ·I mean, do it as one piece?· I mean, I don't think I'm required
`
`16· ·to do it as one piece.
`
`17· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So you would not extrude it
`
`18· ·as one piece, then?· Is that what you're saying?· It would not
`
`19· ·be practical to extrude this as one piece?
`
`20· · · · A· · I don't think it would be the -- Could I extrude it
`
`21· ·out?· Yeah.· Typically, extrusions are not wide pieces like
`
`22· ·this.· Could I?· I guess I could.· It wouldn't be economical to
`
`23· ·do.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Okay.· So a person of skill in the art wouldn't
`
`25· ·extrude the Face Plate 11, as shown -- as that part is shown in
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-014
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`14
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`·1· ·the Raith patent; correct?
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Just that particular piece, I
`
`·4· ·don't think I would do it that way, but I could definitely --
`
`·5· ·in pieces, I could do the side portions and then attach the
`
`·6· ·panel to it.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So if you did it in -- If
`
`·8· ·you manufactured the part in the way you've just described,
`
`·9· ·extruding the side pieces and then attaching them to the panel,
`
`10· ·would that be a preferred way of manufacturing the part as
`
`11· ·opposed to roll forming it?
`
`12· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· It could be if I want to change
`
`14· ·out the different kind of panels that go in the middle,
`
`15· ·depending on what you're trying to do, and that -- and then --
`
`16· ·This patent does talk about that.· Sometimes I don't want to
`
`17· ·use panels.· I want to use glass, for example.
`
`18· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Well, let's just talk about the
`
`19· ·solid Face Plate 11, because the solid face plate is not --
`
`20· · · · A· · But you were talking about all the elements in this
`
`21· ·patent (Indicating).
`
`22· · · · Q· · No, no.
`
`23· · · · A· · You're talking about that particular one?
`
`24· · · · Q· · I'm talking about this particular element, this
`
`25· ·Face Plate No. 11.
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-015
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`15
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`·1· · · · A· · And your question again?· I'm sorry.· State it.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Was whether it would be advantageous to manufacture
`
`·3· ·the Face Plate 11, which is a solid panel, by extruding the
`
`·4· ·side portions and then attaching them to the flat panel
`
`·5· ·portion.
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yes, it could be, depending on
`
`·8· ·what my distribution was and how many panels like that you want
`
`·9· ·to have.· So the answer is, yes, it could be economic.· It
`
`10· ·might be the way you want to do it, depending on the supply
`
`11· ·chain you have and what you're trying to do.
`
`12· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· Would it be more or less
`
`13· ·expensive than roll forming?
`
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`15· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) To extrude the two sides and then
`
`16· ·attach the two sides to a flat panel, would that be more
`
`17· ·expensive or less expensive than taking just one sheet and roll
`
`18· ·forming it, as shown in Raith?
`
`19· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`20· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Well, if I use the same side
`
`21· ·pieces for the variety of types of panels, it could be less
`
`22· ·expensive to do it that way.
`
`23· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· And if this is the only use
`
`24· ·of those side pieces, then would it be more expensive or less
`
`25· ·expensive?
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-016
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`16
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) So you're not getting economies of
`
`·3· ·scale of other parts that we're not talking about?
`
`·4· · · · A· · But that's how I view the Raith patent, but -- I
`
`·5· ·mean, if that's the only thing I could build, would I -- and
`
`·6· ·I'm only -- I have to start with this -- with the Sheet 11,
`
`·7· ·would I extrude that?· I don't think so, if that's your
`
`·8· ·question.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · Okay.· So is it fair, then, to say that whether a
`
`10· ·particular part would be manufactured using a roll forming
`
`11· ·process or an extrusion process -- Well, let's strike that.
`
`12· ·We'll move on.
`
`13· · · · · · · · (Exhibit No. 1018 previously marked)
`
`14· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Dr. Beaman, I'm handing you what's
`
`15· ·been previously marked as Exhibit 1018.
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Do you recognize that document?
`
`18· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`19· · · · Q· · And is this the original expert declaration that you
`
`20· ·submitted in this IPR?
`
`21· · · · A· · I believe it's the first one, yes.
`
`22· · · · Q· · Okay.· So this is the declaration that you state
`
`23· ·contains all your opinions, and your second declaration,
`
`24· ·Exhibit 1038, does not add to or change anything expressed in
`
`25· ·Exhibit 1018; correct?
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-017
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`·1· · · · A· · I think I also had a reply dec, too, that -- after
`
`·2· ·this that was part of the -- I guess -- It's been two years
`
`·3· ·ago, so I'm trying to remember it all, but --
`
`·4· · · · Q· · Okay.
`
`·5· · · · A· · There was this, and I believe there was a reply
`
`·6· ·declaration to the patent owner's response or something. I
`
`·7· ·can't really remember all of it, but I think that's correct.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · All right.· So your supplemental declaration does not
`
`·9· ·add to or change anything that was submitted in Exhibit 1018
`
`10· ·and any reply declaration that you've already submitted in the
`
`11· ·case; is that correct?
`
`12· · · · A· · I believe that would be correct, yes.
`
`13· · · · Q· · Okay.· Thank you.· Could you turn to Paragraphs 97
`
`14· ·through 100 in Exhibit 1018, your original declaration?
`
`15· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`16· · · · Q· · In Paragraphs 97 through 100 of your original
`
`17· ·declaration, this is your opinion concerning the
`
`18· ·unpatentability of Claim 11 of the 901 patent; correct?
`
`19· · · · A· · That is correct, yes.
`
`20· · · · Q· · Okay.· And you quote the language of Claim 11 on
`
`21· ·Page 43, just before Paragraph 97; correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Okay.· And Claim 11 recites a universal foot, a
`
`24· ·leveller, and a structural extrusion; correct?
`
`25· · · · A· · Universal foot, leveller, and structural extrusion,
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-018
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`18
`
`·1· ·yes.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Okay.· Thank you.· Now, in Paragraph 98 of your
`
`·3· ·declaration, you include two annotated figures.· Do you see
`
`·4· ·that?
`
`·5· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · And these are annotated figures from the EVH prior
`
`·7· ·art reference; correct?
`
`·8· · · · A· · That, I believe, is correct.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · An annotated version of Figure 10 of EVH and an
`
`10· ·annotated version of Figure 11 of EVH; correct?
`
`11· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`12· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Might be 12.· Can I make sure I
`
`13· ·can read it?
`
`14· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) You know what?· You're correct.
`
`15· · · · A· · Okay.
`
`16· · · · Q· · It's an annotated Figure 10 and an annotated
`
`17· ·Figure 12 of EVH?
`
`18· · · · A· · I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`19· · · · Q· · Okay.· And on those annotated Figures 10 and 12 of
`
`20· ·EVH, you identify the universal foot of the levelling system of
`
`21· ·Claim 11; correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`23· · · · Q· · And you've identified that in green coloring;
`
`24· ·correct?
`
`25· · · · A· · That is correct.
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-019
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`19
`
`·1· · · · Q· · And then on those same annotated Figures 10 and 12 of
`
`·2· ·EVH, you also identify the leveller of the levelling system;
`
`·3· ·correct?
`
`·4· · · · A· · That would be the -- Yes.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · And you've identified that by coloring the leveller
`
`·6· ·of Claim 11 blue; correct?
`
`·7· · · · A· · That is correct.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · And on those annotated Figures 10 and 12 of EVH, do
`
`·9· ·you identify the structural extrusion?
`
`10· · · · A· · I do not identify that in this figure.
`
`11· · · · Q· · And looking at Paragraphs 97 through 100 of your
`
`12· ·declaration, in those paragraphs do you discuss the structural
`
`13· ·extrusion?
`
`14· · · · A· · I do not discuss the -- I don't use the word
`
`15· ·"extrusion," no.
`
`16· · · · Q· · And so, no, you don't discuss it; is that correct?
`
`17· · · · A· · Except I know the structural extrusion has to be
`
`18· ·connected to the leveller, and I do talk about the -- the
`
`19· ·wall -- the -- I forgot the name of the thing -- vertical post
`
`20· ·is with the sole connection to the panel, so...
`
`21· · · · Q· · So you know that the structural extrusion must be
`
`22· ·connected to the leveller, you stated, but you don't discuss a
`
`23· ·structural extrusion in these Paragraphs 97 through 100;
`
`24· ·correct?
`
`25· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-020
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`20
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Other than the strong implication
`
`·2· ·it would be the -- it would be the vertical post because that's
`
`·3· ·what's connected, yes.· I don't use the word "extrusion."
`
`·4· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So you don't use the word --
`
`·5· ·the phrase "structural extrusion" at all in Paragraphs 97
`
`·6· ·through 100; correct?
`
`·7· · · · A· · I believe that is correct.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Okay.· Now, Claim 11 depends from Claim 1; correct?
`
`·9· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`10· · · · Q· · Okay.· And so your opinion that Claim 11 would have
`
`11· ·been obvious builds upon your opinion that Claim 1 would have
`
`12· ·been obvious; correct?
`
`13· · · · A· · Yeah.· I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`14· · · · Q· · And so if we turn to Paragraphs 71 through 73 of your
`
`15· ·Exhibit 1018 --
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · -- in these paragraphs you offer an opinion about the
`
`18· ·vertical end frames of the panel recited in Claim 1; correct?
`
`19· · · · A· · Yeah.· It's just been a while since I -- This --
`
`20· ·Yeah, this element it's discussing here is "a vertical end
`
`21· ·frame disposed adjacent to each of said right and left" -- The
`
`22· ·element I'm discussing there certainly has, in the paragraph
`
`23· ·right before, "a vertical end frame disposed adjacent to each
`
`24· ·of said right and left side edges."
`
`25· · · · Q· · Okay.· And so the vertical end frames are part of the
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`YVer1f
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-021
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`21
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`·1· ·wall module; correct?
`
`·2· · · · A· · Yes.· I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`·3· · · · Q· · They are -- They form the left and right sides of the
`
`·4· ·wall module, as you just read; correct?
`
`·5· · · · A· · I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · Okay.· And in your Paragraphs 71 through 73, there's
`
`·7· ·no mention of the EVH prior reference at all; correct?
`
`·8· · · · A· · Let me make sure.· (Reviewing document)
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · No, I don't believe it talks about EVH in 71 and
`
`10· ·73 -- through 73.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Okay.· So in your original declaration, Exhibit 1018,
`
`12· ·you offered no opinion that EVH teaches the vertical end frames
`
`13· ·required by Claim 1; correct?
`
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`15· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No, I didn't talk about that --
`
`16· ·that the -- that EVH has a vertical end frame, but it does.
`
`17· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Well -- Now, the vertical end frame
`
`18· ·of Claim 1 was what my question was directed to, because you
`
`19· ·see that the language that you quote just before Paragraph 71
`
`20· ·is the language from Claim 1 regarding a vertical end frame;
`
`21· ·correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes, but I'm not saying that the EVH doesn't have
`
`23· ·one.· I