throbber
08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`· · · · · ·IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`· · · · · · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

`· · ·HNI CORPORATION and· · · · · · *
`· · ·ALLSTEEL INC.,· · · · · · · · ·*
`· · · · · · · · Petitioners,· · · · *Case No. IPR2015-01691
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · *
`· · ·VS.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · *Patent No. 8,024,901
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · *
`· · ·DIRTT ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS· *Issue Date:· September 27, 2011
`· · ·LTD.· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·*
`· · · · · · · ·Patent Owner.· · · · *

`
`· · · · · · · Title:· INTEGRATED RECONFIGURABLE WALL SYSTEM
`
`· · ·---------------------------------------------------------------
`
`· · · · · · ·ORAL DEPOSITION OF JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · NOVEMBER 12, 2018
`
`· · ·---------------------------------------------------------------
`
`· · · · · ·ORAL DEPOSITION of JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D., produced
`
`· · ·as a witness at the instance of the Patent Owner and duly
`
`· · ·sworn, was taken in the above-styled and numbered cause on
`
`· · ·November 12, 2018, from 9:00 a.m. to 10:44 a.m., before
`
`· · ·Sherri K. Williamson, Notary Public in and for the State of
`
`· · ·Texas, reported by method of machine shorthand at the offices
`
`· · ·of U.S. Legal Support, 701 Brazos, Suite 380, Austin, Travis
`
`· · ·County, Texas 78701, pursuant to the provisions stated on the
`
`· · ·record or attached hereto.
`
`· · · · · ·It is stipulated and agreed by and between Counsel and
`
`· · ·the respective parties hereto that the Deposition of the
`
`· · ·Witness named in the caption hereto may be taken at this time
`
`· · ·and place, pursuant to Notice, and that the said deposition or
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-001
`IPR2015-01691
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-002
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`2
`
`·1· ·any part thereof, when so taken, may be used on the trial of
`
`·2· ·this case the same as if the Witness were present in court,
`
`·3· ·testifying in person.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·* * * * * *
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`08:28
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-003
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`3
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · ·A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`·2· ·FOR THE PETITIONERS:
`· · · · · ·FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS
`·3· · · · ·2200 Wells Fargo Center
`· · · · · ·90 S. Seventh St.
`·4· · · · ·Minneapolis, MN 55402
`· · · · · ·timothy.sullivan@faegrebd.com
`·5· · · · ·BY:· MR. TIMOTHY SULLIVAN
`
`·6· ·FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`· · · · · ·WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`·7· · · · ·60 East South Temple St., Suite 1000
`· · · · · ·Salt Lake City, UT 84111
`·8· · · · ·Tel.: (801)533-9800 Fax: (801)328-1707
`· · · · · ·cnydegger@wnlaw.com
`·9· · · · ·BY:· MR. CHAD E. NYDEGGER
`
`10· · · · ·JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.,
`· · · · · · · · The Witness;
`11
`
`12· · · · ·SHERRI K. WILLIAMSON,
`· · · · · · · · Notary Public
`13· · · · · · · in and for the State of Texas
`
`14· · · · · · · · · · · · * * * * * *
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-004
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`4
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I N D E X
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`·3· ·STIPULATIONS.................................................1
`· · ·APPEARANCES..................................................3
`·4
`
`08:28
`
`·5· ·EXAMINATION· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`08:28
`
`·6· ·JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.
`
`08:28
`
`·7· ·Examination by Mr. Nydegger· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 5
`
`08:28
`
`·8· ·Examination by Mr. Sullivan· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·54
`
`08:28
`
`·9· ·Examination by Mr. Nydegger· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·56
`
`08:28
`
`10
`
`08:28
`
`11· ·EXHIBITS· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`12· ·1038· · (Previously marked) Supplemental Declaration of
`· · · · · · · Joseph J. Beaman, Jr.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·7
`13
`
`08:28
`
`14· ·1003· · (Previously marked) U.S. Patent - Raith et al.· · · ·9
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`15· ·1018· · (Previously marked) Expert Declaration of
`· · · · · · · Joseph J. Beaman, Jr.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 16
`16
`
`17· ·1006· · U.S. Patent Application Publication -
`· · · · · · ·MacGregor et al.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 41
`18
`
`08:28
`
`19· ·1004· · (Previously marked) EVH patent documents· · · · · · 58
`
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`08:28
`
`20· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`21· ·SIGNATURE AND CHANGES.......................................60
`· · ·REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE......................................61
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-005
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`5
`
`08:58
`
`08:58
`
`08:58
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:00
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · JOSEPH J. BEAMAN, JR., PH.D.,
`
`·2· · · · ·having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
`
`·4· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Good morning, Dr. Beaman.
`
`·5· · · · A· · Good morning.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · Could you please state your name for the record.
`
`·7· · · · A· · Joseph J. Beaman.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Thank you.· And could you also please provide your
`
`·9· ·address?
`
`10· · · · A· · 700 Texas Avenue, Austin, Texas.
`
`11· · · · Q· · And, Dr. Beaman, I know that you've been deposed a
`
`12· ·number of times before, but I'm just going to go over a few
`
`13· ·quick ground rules, just as reminders for you and for me.
`
`14· ·Okay?
`
`15· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`16· · · · Q· · So as you know, I'll be asking you questions, and
`
`17· ·Sherri here will be taking down everything that we say.· And so
`
`18· ·to make her job easier and to have a clear record, if we can
`
`19· ·remember not to talk over each other, then that will really
`
`20· ·facilitate us getting through the deposition smoothly.· Is that
`
`21· ·amenable to you?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes, it is.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Perfect.· And if you don't understand a question,
`
`24· ·feel free to ask me to rephrase it or just let me know that you
`
`25· ·don't understand it, and I'll do my best to rephrase it in a
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-006
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`6
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:01
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`·1· ·different way that you can understand so that the record will
`
`·2· ·reflect that if you answer a question, you're answering the
`
`·3· ·question that I ask, not a different understanding or a
`
`·4· ·different question.· Do you understand that?
`
`·5· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · And, also, if you could listen to the questions
`
`·7· ·carefully and provide the answer that's asked.· So, for
`
`·8· ·example, if I ask for a "yes" or "no" question, if you could
`
`·9· ·limit your answer to a "yes" or "no" answer, I would appreciate
`
`10· ·that.· And then if there's further explanation that I would
`
`11· ·like or that your counsel would like, then we'll ask you for
`
`12· ·that further explanation.· Do you understand that?
`
`13· · · · A· · Not completely.· Does that mean he can ask me
`
`14· ·questions in the middle of this?
`
`15· · · · Q· · Not in the middle, but he'll get his turn.
`
`16· · · · A· · Okay.
`
`17· · · · Q· · He'll be taking notes, and he'll go back and he'll
`
`18· ·ask you additional questions to clarify where he thinks it's
`
`19· ·necessary.· Okay?
`
`20· · · · · · · · · And if I ask a "yes" or "no" question and you
`
`21· ·can't give a "yes" or "no" answer because it's probably a
`
`22· ·poorly worded question on my part, just let me know.· Say, "I
`
`23· ·can't answer that question with a 'yes' or 'no' answer," and
`
`24· ·then we can proceed from there.· Okay?
`
`25· · · · A· · Okay.
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-007
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`7
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:02
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:03
`
`09:04
`
`·1· · · · Q· · All right.· Also, as you know from being deposed,
`
`·2· ·your counsel here will, at times, state objections for the
`
`·3· ·record; however, unless he specifically instructs you not to
`
`·4· ·answer a question, then you go ahead and answer the question
`
`·5· ·after he's lodged his objection.· Do you understand that?
`
`·6· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · Okay.· And, last, whereas you are now under oath, I'm
`
`·8· ·entitled to discover any communications that you have until the
`
`·9· ·deposition is closed, and that includes correspondence with
`
`10· ·Mr. Sullivan during breaks or during lunch or anything like
`
`11· ·that because you're under oath from now until the deposition
`
`12· ·concludes.· Do you understand that?
`
`13· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Okay.· Well, with that, let's dive in.
`
`15· · · · · · · · · Dr. Beaman, I am handing you an exhibit that was
`
`16· ·previously marked as Exhibit 1038.
`
`17· · · · · · · · (Exhibit No. 1038 previously marked)
`
`18· · · · Q· · (BY MR. SULLIVAN) Dr. Beaman, do you recognize this
`
`19· ·as the supplemental declaration that you have submitted in the
`
`20· ·IPR2015-01691?
`
`21· · · · A· · Yes, I do recognize it.
`
`22· · · · Q· · And that's your signature on the last page?
`
`23· · · · A· · Yes, it is.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Okay.· If you would turn to Paragraph 3, please.· And
`
`25· ·in the second-to-last sentence in that paragraph, you state,
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-008
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`8
`
`·1· ·quote, "My specific opinions on how the relevant prior art
`
`·2· ·combinations teach each element of the newly instituted claims
`
`·3· ·remain unchanged and I do not intend, through this report, to
`
`·4· ·add to or change my previously disclosed opinions," closed
`
`·5· ·quote.· Do you see that?
`
`·6· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · And is it correct that in that sentence you're
`
`·8· ·stating that you're not adding to or changing the opinions that
`
`·9· ·you rendered in your original declaration submitted in this
`
`10· ·IPR?
`
`11· · · · A· · I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`12· · · · Q· · Okay.· Dr. Beaman, are you familiar with the
`
`13· ·manufacturing process of extrusion?
`
`14· · · · A· · Yes, I am.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Are you familiar with the manufacturing process using
`
`16· ·roll forming?
`
`17· · · · A· · Yes, I am.
`
`18· · · · Q· · And are there parts that could be manufactured using
`
`19· ·one of those processes, but not the other?
`
`20· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`21· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· There are parts, yeah, that it
`
`22· ·would be much easier to do one method other than the other one,
`
`23· ·yes.
`
`24· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) So there are instances in which it
`
`25· ·would be -- a person of skill in the art of the 901 patent
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:04
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-009
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`9
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:05
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:06
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`·1· ·would view manufacturing one type of part -- or one part as
`
`·2· ·impractical using one or the other methods; is that correct?
`
`·3· · · · A· · Maybe not economic.· You probably -- maybe could do
`
`·4· ·it, but you may not want to do it.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · Would it be -- Are there -- Can you think of any
`
`·6· ·parts that could not be manufactured using either roll forming
`
`·7· ·or extrusion?
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · Let me rephrase that.· Can you think of any
`
`·9· ·parts that could be manufactured using either roll forming or
`
`10· ·extrusion, but not the other manufacturing process?
`
`11· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`12· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yes, I could.· Yeah.
`
`13· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So not all parts can be
`
`14· ·manufactured using both processes; correct?
`
`15· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`16· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yeah.· You could extrude at an
`
`17· ·intern hole, but you couldn't really -- would be very difficult
`
`18· ·to roll form.· I guess you could close it over, but it would be
`
`19· ·difficult.
`
`20· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· Can you think of any
`
`21· ·parts -- Well, strike that.
`
`22· · · · · · · · (Exhibit No. 1003 previously marked)
`
`23· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Dr. Beaman, I'm handing you what
`
`24· ·has been previously marked as Exhibit 1003.
`
`25· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-010
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`10
`
`·1· · · · Q· · Do you recognize this as the prior art reference we
`
`·2· ·commonly have referred to as the Raith reference in this IPR?
`
`·3· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · MR. NYDEGGER:· That's R-A-I-T-H.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) And if you turn to Figures 1
`
`·6· ·through 5 --
`
`·7· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · -- these are the solid panels of Raith; correct?
`
`·9· · · · A· · Yes.· I mean, they're part of them, sure.
`
`10· · · · Q· · In fact, Figures 1 through 5 are just different views
`
`11· ·of the same part in different configurations; correct?
`
`12· · · · A· · Figure 1 is -- I have to read the patent again for
`
`13· ·Figure 1.· (Reviewing document) Yeah.· So Figure 1 is prior to
`
`14· ·being formed and then Figure 3, I'm sure, is after forming.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Okay.· And then Figure 4 is just a side view, and
`
`16· ·then Figure 5 shows two of those panels that have been formed
`
`17· ·clipped together; correct?
`
`18· · · · A· · I don't think so.· Figure 5 is --
`
`19· · · · Q· · Maybe I can --
`
`20· · · · A· · It's a broken perspective -- oh, "employing two face
`
`21· ·plates," yeah, so -- Okay.· Right.
`
`22· · · · Q· · So we have the -- I believe it's Face Plate 11, and
`
`23· ·you can see that there's Face Plate 11 in Figures 1 through 5.
`
`24· ·Can you see that?
`
`25· · · · A· · Face Plate 11?· I'm sorry.· I don't see it yet.· Oh,
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:07
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:08
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-011
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`11
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:09
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`·1· ·here.· No, no.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · (Indicating)
`
`·3· · · · A· · Yeah.· Yes.· Okay.
`
`·4· · · · Q· · (Indicating)
`
`·5· · · · A· · And there, yes.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · And then -- (Indicating)
`
`·7· · · · A· · And then 11 there, yes, and 11, right, yes
`
`·8· ·(Indicating).
`
`·9· · · · Q· · And so --
`
`10· · · · A· · And the two sides of it, yes.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Okay.· So we're in agreement that Face Plate 11 is
`
`12· ·shown in different states of manufacturing and in different
`
`13· ·configurations in Figures 1 through 5; correct?
`
`14· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`15· · · · Q· · Okay.· Great.
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Thank you.· And would it be practical to manufacture
`
`18· ·the -- Well, let me step back.
`
`19· · · · · · · · · The Face Plate 11, that's intended to be a
`
`20· ·floor-to-ceiling solid panel in a reconfigurable wall; is that
`
`21· ·correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · I don't remember it goes all the way to the ceiling,
`
`23· ·but it's certainly a panel in a reconfigurable wall.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Okay.· Do you want to turn to Figure 13?
`
`25· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-012
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`12
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:10
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:11
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`·1· · · · Q· · And towards the right-hand side, do you see
`
`·2· ·Panel 266, for example?
`
`·3· · · · A· · I will in a minute here.· (Reviewing document) 266,
`
`·4· ·yes.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · And that's a solid panel that goes from the floor to
`
`·6· ·the ceiling; correct?
`
`·7· · · · A· · It appears to.· I mean, there's some trim and there's
`
`·8· ·some things up above which appear to be the ceiling, yes.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · And that's a panel manufactured using the solid
`
`10· ·Face Plate 11 that we looked at in Figures 1 through 5;
`
`11· ·correct?
`
`12· · · · A· · It probably doesn't go and state that, but that would
`
`13· ·be the inference, I believe.
`
`14· · · · Q· · Okay.· So do you agree that these panels could be
`
`15· ·floor-to-ceiling panels, these Face Plate 11?
`
`16· · · · A· · They could be, yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Okay.· And would it be practical to manufacture those
`
`18· ·panels -- solid panels with an extrusion process?
`
`19· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`20· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· The whole panel itself?
`
`21· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Yes.· Well, Panel 11 is a --
`
`22· ·Face Plate 11 is one singular piece; correct?
`
`23· · · · A· · Yes, it is.
`
`24· · · · Q· · And so would it be practical to manufacture that
`
`25· ·using an extrusion process?
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-013
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`13
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:12
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I'm not sure you'd want to do the
`
`·3· ·whole panel, but you can certainly do the side parts of it with
`
`·4· ·extrusion and attach it to it.· So, yeah you could -- by
`
`·5· ·assembly, you could, but whether you do it -- do a -- This has
`
`·6· ·been set up for roll forming, which is off of one plate.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· And so going back to my
`
`·8· ·question -- It's not quite clear to me what your answer is.
`
`·9· ·Would it be practical, from a manufacturing perspective, to
`
`10· ·manufacture these Face Plate 11 parts using an extrusion
`
`11· ·process?
`
`12· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Well, I could have the plates and
`
`14· ·the -- and extrude out the side pieces.· Yes, I could do that.
`
`15· ·I mean, do it as one piece?· I mean, I don't think I'm required
`
`16· ·to do it as one piece.
`
`17· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So you would not extrude it
`
`18· ·as one piece, then?· Is that what you're saying?· It would not
`
`19· ·be practical to extrude this as one piece?
`
`20· · · · A· · I don't think it would be the -- Could I extrude it
`
`21· ·out?· Yeah.· Typically, extrusions are not wide pieces like
`
`22· ·this.· Could I?· I guess I could.· It wouldn't be economical to
`
`23· ·do.
`
`24· · · · Q· · Okay.· So a person of skill in the art wouldn't
`
`25· ·extrude the Face Plate 11, as shown -- as that part is shown in
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-014
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`14
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:13
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`·1· ·the Raith patent; correct?
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Just that particular piece, I
`
`·4· ·don't think I would do it that way, but I could definitely --
`
`·5· ·in pieces, I could do the side portions and then attach the
`
`·6· ·panel to it.
`
`·7· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So if you did it in -- If
`
`·8· ·you manufactured the part in the way you've just described,
`
`·9· ·extruding the side pieces and then attaching them to the panel,
`
`10· ·would that be a preferred way of manufacturing the part as
`
`11· ·opposed to roll forming it?
`
`12· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· It could be if I want to change
`
`14· ·out the different kind of panels that go in the middle,
`
`15· ·depending on what you're trying to do, and that -- and then --
`
`16· ·This patent does talk about that.· Sometimes I don't want to
`
`17· ·use panels.· I want to use glass, for example.
`
`18· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Well, let's just talk about the
`
`19· ·solid Face Plate 11, because the solid face plate is not --
`
`20· · · · A· · But you were talking about all the elements in this
`
`21· ·patent (Indicating).
`
`22· · · · Q· · No, no.
`
`23· · · · A· · You're talking about that particular one?
`
`24· · · · Q· · I'm talking about this particular element, this
`
`25· ·Face Plate No. 11.
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-015
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`15
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:14
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:15
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`·1· · · · A· · And your question again?· I'm sorry.· State it.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Was whether it would be advantageous to manufacture
`
`·3· ·the Face Plate 11, which is a solid panel, by extruding the
`
`·4· ·side portions and then attaching them to the flat panel
`
`·5· ·portion.
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yes, it could be, depending on
`
`·8· ·what my distribution was and how many panels like that you want
`
`·9· ·to have.· So the answer is, yes, it could be economic.· It
`
`10· ·might be the way you want to do it, depending on the supply
`
`11· ·chain you have and what you're trying to do.
`
`12· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· Would it be more or less
`
`13· ·expensive than roll forming?
`
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`15· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) To extrude the two sides and then
`
`16· ·attach the two sides to a flat panel, would that be more
`
`17· ·expensive or less expensive than taking just one sheet and roll
`
`18· ·forming it, as shown in Raith?
`
`19· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`20· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Well, if I use the same side
`
`21· ·pieces for the variety of types of panels, it could be less
`
`22· ·expensive to do it that way.
`
`23· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· And if this is the only use
`
`24· ·of those side pieces, then would it be more expensive or less
`
`25· ·expensive?
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-016
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`16
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Objection; form.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) So you're not getting economies of
`
`·3· ·scale of other parts that we're not talking about?
`
`·4· · · · A· · But that's how I view the Raith patent, but -- I
`
`·5· ·mean, if that's the only thing I could build, would I -- and
`
`·6· ·I'm only -- I have to start with this -- with the Sheet 11,
`
`·7· ·would I extrude that?· I don't think so, if that's your
`
`·8· ·question.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · Okay.· So is it fair, then, to say that whether a
`
`10· ·particular part would be manufactured using a roll forming
`
`11· ·process or an extrusion process -- Well, let's strike that.
`
`12· ·We'll move on.
`
`13· · · · · · · · (Exhibit No. 1018 previously marked)
`
`14· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Dr. Beaman, I'm handing you what's
`
`15· ·been previously marked as Exhibit 1018.
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · Do you recognize that document?
`
`18· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`19· · · · Q· · And is this the original expert declaration that you
`
`20· ·submitted in this IPR?
`
`21· · · · A· · I believe it's the first one, yes.
`
`22· · · · Q· · Okay.· So this is the declaration that you state
`
`23· ·contains all your opinions, and your second declaration,
`
`24· ·Exhibit 1038, does not add to or change anything expressed in
`
`25· ·Exhibit 1018; correct?
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:16
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-017
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:17
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:18
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`·1· · · · A· · I think I also had a reply dec, too, that -- after
`
`·2· ·this that was part of the -- I guess -- It's been two years
`
`·3· ·ago, so I'm trying to remember it all, but --
`
`·4· · · · Q· · Okay.
`
`·5· · · · A· · There was this, and I believe there was a reply
`
`·6· ·declaration to the patent owner's response or something. I
`
`·7· ·can't really remember all of it, but I think that's correct.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · All right.· So your supplemental declaration does not
`
`·9· ·add to or change anything that was submitted in Exhibit 1018
`
`10· ·and any reply declaration that you've already submitted in the
`
`11· ·case; is that correct?
`
`12· · · · A· · I believe that would be correct, yes.
`
`13· · · · Q· · Okay.· Thank you.· Could you turn to Paragraphs 97
`
`14· ·through 100 in Exhibit 1018, your original declaration?
`
`15· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`16· · · · Q· · In Paragraphs 97 through 100 of your original
`
`17· ·declaration, this is your opinion concerning the
`
`18· ·unpatentability of Claim 11 of the 901 patent; correct?
`
`19· · · · A· · That is correct, yes.
`
`20· · · · Q· · Okay.· And you quote the language of Claim 11 on
`
`21· ·Page 43, just before Paragraph 97; correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes, I do.
`
`23· · · · Q· · Okay.· And Claim 11 recites a universal foot, a
`
`24· ·leveller, and a structural extrusion; correct?
`
`25· · · · A· · Universal foot, leveller, and structural extrusion,
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-018
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`18
`
`·1· ·yes.
`
`·2· · · · Q· · Okay.· Thank you.· Now, in Paragraph 98 of your
`
`·3· ·declaration, you include two annotated figures.· Do you see
`
`·4· ·that?
`
`·5· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · And these are annotated figures from the EVH prior
`
`·7· ·art reference; correct?
`
`·8· · · · A· · That, I believe, is correct.
`
`·9· · · · Q· · An annotated version of Figure 10 of EVH and an
`
`10· ·annotated version of Figure 11 of EVH; correct?
`
`11· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`12· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Might be 12.· Can I make sure I
`
`13· ·can read it?
`
`14· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) You know what?· You're correct.
`
`15· · · · A· · Okay.
`
`16· · · · Q· · It's an annotated Figure 10 and an annotated
`
`17· ·Figure 12 of EVH?
`
`18· · · · A· · I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`19· · · · Q· · Okay.· And on those annotated Figures 10 and 12 of
`
`20· ·EVH, you identify the universal foot of the levelling system of
`
`21· ·Claim 11; correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`23· · · · Q· · And you've identified that in green coloring;
`
`24· ·correct?
`
`25· · · · A· · That is correct.
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:19
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-019
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`19
`
`·1· · · · Q· · And then on those same annotated Figures 10 and 12 of
`
`·2· ·EVH, you also identify the leveller of the levelling system;
`
`·3· ·correct?
`
`·4· · · · A· · That would be the -- Yes.
`
`·5· · · · Q· · And you've identified that by coloring the leveller
`
`·6· ·of Claim 11 blue; correct?
`
`·7· · · · A· · That is correct.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · And on those annotated Figures 10 and 12 of EVH, do
`
`·9· ·you identify the structural extrusion?
`
`10· · · · A· · I do not identify that in this figure.
`
`11· · · · Q· · And looking at Paragraphs 97 through 100 of your
`
`12· ·declaration, in those paragraphs do you discuss the structural
`
`13· ·extrusion?
`
`14· · · · A· · I do not discuss the -- I don't use the word
`
`15· ·"extrusion," no.
`
`16· · · · Q· · And so, no, you don't discuss it; is that correct?
`
`17· · · · A· · Except I know the structural extrusion has to be
`
`18· ·connected to the leveller, and I do talk about the -- the
`
`19· ·wall -- the -- I forgot the name of the thing -- vertical post
`
`20· ·is with the sole connection to the panel, so...
`
`21· · · · Q· · So you know that the structural extrusion must be
`
`22· ·connected to the leveller, you stated, but you don't discuss a
`
`23· ·structural extrusion in these Paragraphs 97 through 100;
`
`24· ·correct?
`
`25· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:20
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:21
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-020
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`20
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Other than the strong implication
`
`·2· ·it would be the -- it would be the vertical post because that's
`
`·3· ·what's connected, yes.· I don't use the word "extrusion."
`
`·4· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Okay.· So you don't use the word --
`
`·5· ·the phrase "structural extrusion" at all in Paragraphs 97
`
`·6· ·through 100; correct?
`
`·7· · · · A· · I believe that is correct.
`
`·8· · · · Q· · Okay.· Now, Claim 11 depends from Claim 1; correct?
`
`·9· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`10· · · · Q· · Okay.· And so your opinion that Claim 11 would have
`
`11· ·been obvious builds upon your opinion that Claim 1 would have
`
`12· ·been obvious; correct?
`
`13· · · · A· · Yeah.· I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`14· · · · Q· · And so if we turn to Paragraphs 71 through 73 of your
`
`15· ·Exhibit 1018 --
`
`16· · · · A· · Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q· · -- in these paragraphs you offer an opinion about the
`
`18· ·vertical end frames of the panel recited in Claim 1; correct?
`
`19· · · · A· · Yeah.· It's just been a while since I -- This --
`
`20· ·Yeah, this element it's discussing here is "a vertical end
`
`21· ·frame disposed adjacent to each of said right and left" -- The
`
`22· ·element I'm discussing there certainly has, in the paragraph
`
`23· ·right before, "a vertical end frame disposed adjacent to each
`
`24· ·of said right and left side edges."
`
`25· · · · Q· · Okay.· And so the vertical end frames are part of the
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:22
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:23
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`YVer1f
`
`

`

`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2010-021
`IPR2015-01691
`
`
`
`Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018Joseph Beaman· *· November 12, 2018
`
`21
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:24
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:25
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`09:26
`
`·1· ·wall module; correct?
`
`·2· · · · A· · Yes.· I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`·3· · · · Q· · They are -- They form the left and right sides of the
`
`·4· ·wall module, as you just read; correct?
`
`·5· · · · A· · I believe that's correct, yes.
`
`·6· · · · Q· · Okay.· And in your Paragraphs 71 through 73, there's
`
`·7· ·no mention of the EVH prior reference at all; correct?
`
`·8· · · · A· · Let me make sure.· (Reviewing document)
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · No, I don't believe it talks about EVH in 71 and
`
`10· ·73 -- through 73.
`
`11· · · · Q· · Okay.· So in your original declaration, Exhibit 1018,
`
`12· ·you offered no opinion that EVH teaches the vertical end frames
`
`13· ·required by Claim 1; correct?
`
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. SULLIVAN:· Object to form.
`
`15· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No, I didn't talk about that --
`
`16· ·that the -- that EVH has a vertical end frame, but it does.
`
`17· · · · Q· · (BY MR. NYDEGGER) Well -- Now, the vertical end frame
`
`18· ·of Claim 1 was what my question was directed to, because you
`
`19· ·see that the language that you quote just before Paragraph 71
`
`20· ·is the language from Claim 1 regarding a vertical end frame;
`
`21· ·correct?
`
`22· · · · A· · Yes, but I'm not saying that the EVH doesn't have
`
`23· ·one.· I

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket