throbber
G. GOSLING
` IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 1
`
`-----------------------------------------------------
`HNI Corporation and Allsteel, Inc.,
`
` Petitioners,
`-vs-
`DIRTT Environmental Solutions, Ltd.,
` Patent Owner.
`-----------------------------------------------------
` Case No. IPR2015-01691
` Patent No. 8,024,901
` Issue Date: September 27, 2011
` Title: Integrated Reconfigurable Wall System
`
`-----------------------------------------------------
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF GEOFFREY GOSLING
` Chicago, Illinois
` Thursday, June 16, 2016
`
`Reported by:
`PAULA CAMPBELL, CSR, RDR, CRR, CRC
`JOB 108219
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`ALLSTEEL EXHIBIT 1031
`Allsteel v. DIRTT Environmental; IPR2015-001691
`
`

`
` G. GOSLING
`
`Page 2
`
` June 16, 2016
` 9:08 A.M.
`
` Videotaped discovery deposition of
`GEOFFREY GOSLING, held at the offices of NEAL,
`GERBER & EISENBERG LLP, 2 North LaSalle
`Street, Chicago, Illinois, pursuant to notice
`before Paula Campbell, CSR, RDR, CRR, CRC.
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5 6 7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
` G. GOSLING
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
` FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS
` Attorneys for the Petitioner
` 2200 Wells Fargo Center
` 90 South Seventh Street
` Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
` BY: TIMOTHY SULLIVAN, ESQ.
` VICTOR JONAS, ESQ.
`
` WORKMAN NYDEGGER
` Attorneys for the Patent Owner
` 1000 Eagle Gate Tower
` 60 East South Temple
` Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
` BY: CHAD NYDEGGER, ESQ.
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
` Scot Ziarko, Videographer
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. This is the
`start of media labeled No. 1 of the video
`deposition of Geoff -- Geoff Gosling in the
`matter of HNI Corporation and Allsteel, Inc.
`versus DIRTT Environmental Solutions, Ltd.,
`Case No. IPR2015-01691.
` This deposition is being held at 2 North
`LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, on
`June 16th, 2016. The time is now approximately
`9:08 A.M.
` My name is Scot Ziarko. I'm with TSG
`Reporting, Inc. I am the legal video
`specialist. The court reporter today is Paula
`Campbell, also with TSG Reporting.
` Will counsel please introduce yourselves,
`and the court reporter please swear in the
`witness.
` MR. SULLIVAN: Tim Sullivan from the law
`firm Faegre Baker Daniels on behalf of the
`Petitioner. And also with me is my colleague,
`Victor Jonas, of Faegre Baker Daniels on behalf
`of Petitioner.
` MR. NYDEGGER: Chad Nydegger from Workman
`Nydegger representing the Patent Owner, and
`
`

`
`Page 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` with me today I have Dale Sawyer, a client
` representative.
` REPORTER: Would you please raise your
` right hand.
`G E O F F R E Y G O S L I N G,
` called as a witness, having been duly sworn,
` was examined and testified as follows:
` VIDEOGRAPHER: You may begin.
`EXAMINATION
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
` Q. Good morning, Mr. Gosling.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. Could we start out by having you state and
`spell your full name for the record and also your
`current address.
` A. My name is Geoffrey William Gosling,
`G-e-o-f-f-r-e-y W-i-l-l-i-a-m G-o-s-l-i-n-g. I live
`at 32 Collingwood Place, C-o-l-l-i-n-g-w-o-o-d
`Place, Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2L 0P9.
` Q. Thank you.
` Mr. Gosling, have you ever been deposed
`before?
` A. I have not.
` Q. Okay. So just a few basics to go over with
`
`

`
`Page 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`you. So I think the first thing is we'll plan to
`take a break every hour or so is kind of how I
`operate.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Any time that you want to break this
`morning or throughout the day, we don't have to --
`it can be earlier than an hour, you know, just
`whenever you feel like you need a break for any
`reason. I just ask that if we do have a question
`pending, that we finish off that question. But
`we'll plan to break for lunch, you know, if we need
`a lunch. We may not need it today.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Kind of see how things are going. But
`probably after the second session we'll -- we'll
`think about breaking for lunch.
` The one thing that I think people who
`haven't been deposed before can overlook sometimes
`is that in normal kind of human conversation we do a
`lot of nonverbal yeses and nos and uh-huh or yep and
`things like that. It's just really helpful if you
`can respond to my questions with verbal, you know,
`yeses and nos and try to say void the nonverbals, or
`at least to accompany them --
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` A. Fair -- yeah, fair enough.
` Q. -- with verbals.
` And just, you know, again, so that we are
`not talking over each other, I will do my best to
`not talk over when you are giving an answer, and if
`you can just wait until I finish a question, because
`it gets to be a little bit, you know, different than
`what -- how we interact, just as normal people on
`the street interacting.
` A. Right.
` Q. I just want to make sure the court reporter
`has a clear record.
` And do you have any questions just about
`the process before we kind of dive in?
` A. I mean, no shortage of them, but, you know,
`we don't have that much beer. No, I'm -- I think
`I'm -- I think I'm okay.
` Q. Okay. So you understand that you're here
`today in connection with a matter that's pending
`before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent
`Trial and Appeal Board, specifically IPR number
`2015-01691 and this relates to proceedings
`concerning DIRTT's patent, which I'll call the '901
`patent.
`
`

`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` Do you understand that?
` A. Yeah, as far as the number that you just
`recited, I'm going to have to trust you that's the
`right number. I haven't memorized them; so...
` Q. Sure.
` But it relates to a patent that you are --
` A. Right.
` Q. -- one of the inventors on?
` A. Right.
` Q. And it's a patent that's owned by your
`company, DIRTT; correct?
` A. Right. Yes.
` Q. So I'd like to start just by talking about
`your background a little bit.
` Can you -- can you just talk to me a little
`bit about -- I guess let's just start with your
`college education experience.
` A. So, um, my dad would say it's a long and
`sordid tale. I began at the University of Calgary
`in a -- in a Bachelor's of Science program. Didn't
`finish, realized that that was not my calling. I
`ended up going to the Alberta College of Art, where
`I graduated with honors in sculpture.
` And shortly thereafter I -- I realized
`
`

`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`that -- that eating was a good thing, so I decided
`that I needed to augment that education with
`something more -- more founded in, you know,
`commercial application. So I then went on to do my
`Master's Degree in environmental design with a
`specialization in industrial design.
` Q. What year did you complete your Bachelor's
`Degree in sculpture?
` A. Hmm, that is a good question. I want to
`say that it was around 1987/'88, but I could be
`completely wrong. That was -- that was a bit of a
`rush through everything. So, anyway, it's
`somewhere -- it's somewhere in there.
` Q. You think it was before 1990?
` A. Yes. It was before 1990.
` Q. Somewhere in the '87 to 1990 range?
` A. Yeah. I think it was -- I think it was
`'87, but it might have been '86 even.
` Q. And, then, how about your Master's in
`environmental -- did you say environmental science?
` A. Environmental design.
` Q. Environmental design.
` When did -- when did you complete that
`degree?
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` A. Formally I believe my convocation was in
`'91. But, again, it might have been '90. It's
`amazing how those details seem unimportant.
` Q. Okay. So, then, let's talk about your next
`steps after you finished your Master's in the 1991
`time frame.
` What was your first job after you completed
`your Master's?
` A. I -- do you want to know the employer's
`name and all that or --
` Q. As best you can recall.
` A. Oh, yeah, I can recall. I just didn't know
`if it was important.
` Tresco Industries in Calgary, Alberta.
`They were, or are I should say, manufacturers of
`command and control room solutions. So I joined
`them actually while I was finishing my thesis for my
`Master's. So I actually joined them just before I
`defended my thesis.
` Q. Okay. How many years were you at Tresco?
` A. I want to say -- I want to say about a year
`and a half, or so, something like that.
` Q. So you would have left Tresco sometime in
`the 1993 time frame, 1994?
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` A. Yeah, I guess.
` Q. Okay.
` A. I guess. I can't say for certain, but that
`feels about right.
` Q. Can you tell me a little bit more about the
`products or the business? I think you said command
`and control, but what was the -- what was the
`business? What was the product for Tresco
`Industries?
` A. The product was a control room console
`which is what I would see in, say, a 9-1-1 facility
`or what you would see in, say, oil and gas or
`electrical utility, you know, surveillance of the --
`of the grid, right. So if you ever see, you know,
`pictures of those environments, those control rooms,
`the desking system that those operators are sitting
`at, that's what I designed.
` Q. Okay. So not the control room, I guess,
`electronics themselves, but the furniture --
` A. No.
` Q. -- basically that the --
` A. The furniture, yeah.
` Q. Okay.
` A. So it was, you know, integration of at that
`
`

`
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`time cathode ray tube, CRTs, displays, whatever --
`whatever technologies that might be, you know, part
`of that. But, candidly, not the most sophisticated
`solution, but that was the application.
` Q. Okay. So that takes us up to, you know,
`roughly the 1993 time frame.
` What was your next job after Tresco
`Industries?
` A. I went to Evans Consoles, who are, again, a
`command and control room company. They -- they do
`the same thing. They actually approached me. They
`saw my work at Tresco and saw the value in my work,
`I suppose. And, so, I departed Tresco and moved
`to -- to Evans.
` Q. Okay. How long were you at Evans?
` A. Well, let's see here. Well, I left Evans
`to start DIRTT, so whatever that math says. Is that
`12 years/11 years?
` So when we -- when we started DIRTT, I left
`Evans to -- to start DIRTT. So I was in there
`for -- I was in that industry for quite a while.
` Q. Documents I've looked at I -- my
`recollection is that DIRTT was founded in 2014; is
`that right?
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` A. 2004.
` Q. I'm sorry. 2004; right?
` A. Yeah. Yeah.
` Q. I didn't mean to add a decade.
` A. Carrying the two, yeah. That sounds about
`right, yeah.
` Q. 2004, okay.
` A. Yeah.
` Q. So you were -- okay. I got it.
` So you were at Evans control from maybe
`1993 --
` A. Evans Consoles.
` Q. Or Evans Consoles from 1993 to about 2003
`or 2004 when --
` A. Yeah, that sounds -- sounds about right.
`It might have been six months here or there, but...
` Q. Over the course of the, you know, ten plus
`years that you were at Evans Consoles, did you work
`on any other products besides command and control
`room consoles?
` A. We did kiosks, which was an interesting
`event. So -- so public access terminals they are
`called, what you would know as a kiosk, where they
`would be a free-standing object.
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` You know, an example of that would be, you
`know, you go to, I don't know, take the train and
`you go up and you buy your ticket through a
`free-standing object. So -- so, yeah, I was
`involved in the design of those, which are really
`just versions of consoles. They were just single
`units, but it was still around that -- that same
`notion around technology integration, sort of finite
`objects, but outside of that, it was all consoles.
` Q. The consoles that you worked on at both
`Evans and Tresco, were those designed to be
`permanent structures in the facilities where they
`were installed?
` A. Absolutely, yeah.
` Q. And the kiosks that you worked on, were
`those designed to be permanent structures in the
`sense that you couldn't take apart the kiosk and put
`it somewhere else?
` A. They were -- they were bolted to the
`building. They were -- they were installed, right.
`There was obviously security issues, all that,
`because they are out in -- in the public space. So,
`yeah, they were not meant to be mobile.
` Q. So in the time before you founded DIRTT
`
`

`
`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`with others, your prior work experience didn't
`involve designing movable structures?
` A. No.
` Q. So it follows from that that your time
`before you founded DIRTT didn't involved experience
`in designing movable walls?
` A. No, none.
` Q. When did you first meet Mogens Smed?
` A. When he walked through the door to become
`the CEO of Evans.
` Q. To become the CEO of Evans, okay.
` What year was that, approximately?
` A. Well, I'm going to say that would have been
`2003.
` Q. Okay.
` A. But I -- you know, it could have been 2002.
`I don't -- I don't know for certain how long he was
`at Evans.
` Q. Prior to meeting Mr. Smed, did you have any
`professional experience working with movable walls?
` A. No.
` Q. And when you met Mr. Smed in roughly 2003,
`maybe give or take a year, Mr. Smed, to your
`knowledge, had experience working in movable walls;
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`is that correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. As best you can recall, what was Mr. Smed
`doing before he became the CEO of Evans Consoles --
`Consoles?
` A. He was retired.
` Q. How long had he been retired?
` A. That I don't know. I don't know that -- I
`don't think it was very long, but I don't know how
`long it was.
` Q. What had been his previous role before he
`retired?
` A. He was with Haworth. I actually don't know
`what his role was.
` Q. So after meeting Mr. Smed in the 2003 time
`frame I take it that somehow the two of you, and
`potentially others, had an idea for a new company;
`fair?
` A. Not quite. We -- we had an affinity for
`each other.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Right. Like we -- we shared a like view.
`We just knew we wanted to do something together.
` Q. Okay. Okay. Can you tell me the
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`circumstances where -- well, when did you and
`Mr. Smed first decide that you wanted to design a
`movable wall system?
` A. I -- I actually don't know that there was a
`time. It was -- it was pretty -- pretty organic in
`terms of the kinds of things that we were talking
`about. I know that he liked how I talked about
`solving problems, and I liked how he was interested
`in notions of sustainability, and that, you know, I
`just recall that we were talking about all manner of
`things. When we decided it was going to end up
`being a wall, I actually -- I couldn't put my finger
`on it.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Sorry for the longwinded answer there.
` Q. No, no problem.
` I guess, did you -- did you settle on, you
`know, the design of a movable wall system as the
`product that DIRTT was going to be selling before or
`after you left Evans Consoles?
` A. Um, I think it was part of it. You know,
`there was also notions around doing a furniture
`system that behaved alike with the walls, right. So
`it was a component of an environmental design, but
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`it was certainly on the list.
` Q. Do you recall when you first approached a
`customer or a potential customer and, you know, told
`them about your DIRTT wall system and tried to earn
`their business?
` MR. NYDEGGER: Objection.
` I let you go on for a while here, Tim, but
` the scope of the deposition is the declaration
` that's been submitted in the IPR. And, so, I'm
` not going to allow you to go into things, like
` to establish invalidity defenses that you want
` to assert possibly in the concurrent
` litigation, and, so, you know, starting to ask
` about things like, you know, first sale and
` that sort of things, it's completely outside
` the scope of the declaration.
` And if you want to go there, we need to
` have a call with the Board, because we are
` going to move to limit the deposition to the
` declaration that's been submitted, because
` that's what's at issue in the IPR for the
` reason we're here today.
` MR. SULLIVAN: Okay, Chad. So,
` Mr. Nydegger, that's clearly a speaking
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`objection, but I'll respond to your objection.
` My understanding is that Mr. Gosling is a
`witness on secondary considerations of
`obviousness, and he has provided testimony in
`his declaration that relate to, among other
`things, long-felt need and failure by others.
`It's important for me to understand
`Mr. Gosling's knowledge and what was going on
`in the industry at the time when he joined the
`industry. Directly relevant to long-felt need,
`failure by others and other secondary
`conditions of obviousness, which is clearly,
`squarely at issue in this proceeding.
` If you feel like you need to limit the
`deposition, call the Board, if we need to -- to
`stop, we are going to seek fees, and we are
`going to seek costs if we have to interrupt
`this deposition, and I'd ask you to not
`interrupt me with speaking objections any more.
`Every question I've asked is clearly relevant
`to secondary considerations of nonobviousness.
` MR. NYDEGGER: If you want to ask about the
`state of the industry at the time, that's fine,
`but I'm not going to allow you to go into
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`issues that could be used in the -- as defenses
`in the litigation, because that's -- that's
`clearly outside the scope.
` MR. SULLIVAN: You have a perception of the
`legal impact of the questions I'm asking. I
`get that. But the questions I'm asking relate
`to what was happening in the industry. And
`obviously when the DIRTT wall was starting to
`be sold to customers is part of what was
`happening in the -- in the industry, and that
`is exactly what Mr. Gosling spoke to in his
`declaration.
` So the fact that this could be relevant to
`some other legal issue in your imagination does
`not preclude me from asking the question
`because it is relevant to exactly what the
`Board needs to consider on secondary
`considerations here.
` So I just -- I'm going to proceed with the
`deposition now.
` MR. NYDEGGER: Okay. Well, if it -- if it
`gets too far, then we will stop and we will
`make a call.
` MR. SULLIVAN: I understand.
`
`

`
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
` Q. When did you first approach customers about
`selling them the DIRTT wall, to the best of your
`recollection?
` A. When did I first approach?
` Q. Sure.
` A. I -- I'm the designer of the product, so I
`was not approaching customers.
` Q. Okay. Who is the -- okay. So as -- as the
`designer of the DIRTT wall product and not the
`salesperson for the DIRTT wall product, would you
`have had an awareness of other movable wall systems
`in the market as of 2004?
` A. Actually, no. One of the things that I put
`a lot of effort into was to protect our lack of
`knowledge. We had a rare opportunity in that we did
`not come from the industry, and we did not want to
`mimic. We -- we saw an opportunity to look at the
`world objectively and through a solutions-based
`process as opposed to a market-based process. So --
`so we put every effort into not looking at what
`other manufacturers did.
` Q. Okay. So you don't know whether in 2004
`there were other movable wall systems on the market
`
`

`
`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`that included a zipper connection method as well as
`horizontal stringers with attached aesthetics?
` A. No. I don't.
` Q. You don't know, for example, whether the KI
`Genius wall that existed in 2004 had a zipper
`connector method as well as horizontal stringers
`with aesthetics attached?
` MR. NYDEGGER: Objection.
` A. I don't.
` Q. You don't know whether the wall that
`Mr. Smed was selling as the LifeSPACE wall in part
`of his prior work history, you don't know whether
`the Smed wall had a zipper connection method as well
`as horizontal stringers with aesthetics attached?
` MR. NYDEGGER: Objection.
` A. I know that they had connectors between
`their walls. That's as far as I knew.
` Q. Okay. Was it a zipper type connection
`method?
` A. I actually don't know specifically. The
`zipper itself is a very unique object. So if you're
`trying to generalize about a vertical connector,
`then I would say the answer is no.
` Q. Would you say a zipper is a particular -- a
`
`

`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`very specific type of object. Do you have in mind
`the specific zipper that is included in the DIRTT
`walls?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So I'm thinking of a zipper a little bit
`more generally. Maybe we could agree on a
`definition of sort of a flexible plastic -- long
`plastic component that attaches adjacent wall
`modules together?
` A. Yeah, but that's -- that's -- that's -- we
`might as well just say a PVC thing, because that is
`not a complete -- in any way complete definition of
`what we invented.
` Q. Sure.
` And I understand that you have a particular
`zipper that you use, and you have -- that's what you
`have in mind when I'm asking you questions about a
`zipper. But the definition I gave where we just
`have a long, you know, flexible some type of polymer
`strip that connects adjacent wall modules in a way
`such that, you know, the strip can be removed and
`the walls can be reconfigured, there are other
`solutions out there besides DIRTT that have a zipper
`under that definition; right?
`
`

`
`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` A. So I will not agree to call that a zipper.
`I will agree to call that a vertical connector, but
`it is not a zipper.
` Q. Okay. So there are other companies that
`have a vertical connector that allow for
`reconfiguration of adjacent wall modules other than
`DIRTT; correct?
` A. I -- I don't know.
` Q. You've --
` A. I just said that I don't know other
`products.
` Q. Okay. Do you know whether any products
`existing on the market currently include a vertical
`connector, given the definition we've been
`discussing?
` A. Again, I -- I have protected my knowledge.
`I don't -- I don't know. I don't look at what other
`manufacturers do at all.
` Q. Okay. Have you looked at what Allsteel has
`done, for example?
` A. Deliberately, no.
` Q. Do you know whether Haworth prior to 2004
`sold any products that included a vertical connector
`for adjoining adjacent wall modules?
`
`

`
`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` A. Um, if it's -- if you're -- are you talking
`about the Smed product?
` Q. Haworth may have more products other than
`the Smed product, but --
` A. Then I -- no. I don't. If anything, I
`understand how the Smed product worked, but I don't
`know anything beyond that.
` Q. The Smed product included a vertical
`connector for adjoining adjacent wall modules to the
`best of your knowledge?
` A. Yeah, but it was just a -- it was just a
`clamp kind of thing, not the same thing.
` Q. How about Steelcase, does that prior to --
` A. Again, you can pick any manufacturer, and
`I'll say I don't know, because I honestly, sincerely
`don't know.
` Q. So I'm just going to -- I just -- I need to
`ask.
` A. Okay. Okay.
` Q. I need to go through the list.
` A. New to me.
` Q. And I'm sorry that it's --
` A. Yeah.
` Q. It will be repetitive, but I'm going
`
`

`
`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`through the list.
` A. All right. Here we go.
` Q. So did -- to your knowledge, prior to 2004
`did Steelcase sell any products that included a
`vertical connector for -- for joining adjacent wall
`modules?
` A. Did I know? Sorry. No. I didn't. No,
`don't know.
` Q. Do you know whether prior to August 2004
`whether KI sold products that included a vertical
`connector for adjoining adjacent wall modules?
` A. I don't know.
` Q. Do you know whether prior to 2004 Transwall
`sold any products that included a vertical connector
`for adjoining adjacent wall modules?
` A. I don't know.
` Q. Do you know whether prior to August 2004
`Inscape sold any products that included a vertical
`connector for adjoining adjacent wall modules?
` A. I don't know.
` Q. And do you know whether prior to 2004
`Infinium sold any products that included a vertical
`connector for adjoining adjacent wall modules?
` A. I don't know.
`
`

`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` Q. And I've just listed -- I'll just ask this
`one as a summary question for you, or put them all
`together, and we'll see if that works, but I've --
`we've gone through Haworth, Steelcase, KI,
`Transwall, Inscape and Infinium, and my questions
`before were limited to prior to 2004. So just to
`treat those all as a group, since 2004 do you know
`whether any of these companies, you know, beginning
`since August 2004, have sold products that include a
`vertical connector for connecting adjacent wall
`modules?
` A. I -- I don't know.
` Q. Have you ever seen the Smed wall product?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. When was the first time you recall seeing
`the Smed wall product?
` A. Um, it would have been around the time that
`we started DIRTT.
` Q. Did you use the Smed wall product as a
`starting point for designing the --
` A. No.
` Q. Let me just --
` A. Absolutely not.
` Q. I'll just -- let me just --
`
`

`
`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` A. Sorry.
` Q. And I -- just so we have a clear record, so
`I think based on your indication there, you did not
`use the Smed wall as a starting point for designing
`the DIRTT movable wall system; correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And the Smed wall also goes by the name of
`the LifeSPACE wall; is that your understanding?
` A. I think so. I don't know -- yeah. I think
`so.
` MR. SULLIVAN: We will mark this as
` Exhibit 1028.
` (Exhibit 1028 marked for identification.)
` Q. Mr. Gosling, there are vertical connectors,
`as we have been de -- as we have defined them, for
`adjoining adjacent wall modules such that the wall
`modules can be reconfigured that don't fall under
`the claims of the '901 patent; correct?
` MR. NYDEGGER: Objection. Foundation.
` A. Sorry. I'm not sure I understand the
`question.
` Q. Is it possible to have a vertical connector
`in a movable wall system that does not use the
`technology of the '901 patent?
`
`

`
`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` MR. NYDEGGER: Objection.
` A. I mean, of course.
` Q. The Smed wall is one example of a vert --
`of a system that had a vertical connector that
`didn't use the technology of the '901 patent; right?
` A. Correct.
` Q. I've handed you --
` A. So I want to -- sorry. I just want a
`clarification on what you mean by the word
`"technology," because that could mean the material.
`What do you mean by the word "technology"?
` Q. So I mean the technology that is covered by
`the claims of the '901 patent.
` A. Okay. So in terms of the interface, the --
`the fin registration, all of that.
` Q. Sure.
` A. Right. So, then, okay, I stick with that.
` Q. Maybe let's -- let's get a little clarity.
` I know I've just handed you Exhibit 1028.
`I'm going to hand a different exhibit, and we will
`maybe come back to that one.
` THE WITNESS: There is gnats everywhere in
` this space.
` MR. SULLIVAN: So I'm going to hand the
`
`

`
`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` witness what's previously been marked as
` Exhibit 2004-1.
` (Whereupon a discussion was had off the
` record.)
` (Exhibit 2004-1 marked for identification.)
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
` Q. Mr. Gosling, I've handed you DIRTT
`Exhibit 2004-1. Is this a copy of the declaration
`that you submitted in connection with the IPR
`proceedings that you're here to provide testimony
`about today?
` A. I'm assuming it's the same as the one that
`has been given to me by counsel, then yes.
` Q. Okay. So in this declaration, under
`paragraph 2, you put in there the language from
`claim 1 of the '901 patent; right?
` A. Right.
` Q. And if I point you to within claim 1 there,
`there is the letter B?
` A. Uh-huh.
` Q. And under the letter B there it starts
`to -- it starts with the language, "A removable
`connection strip having a pair of spaced apart
`flexible arms, each arm having a beaded portion
`
`

`
`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
`thereon, the beaded portion of one of said arms
`being adapted to connect releasably to the beaded
`portion of one of said first vertically extending
`flange or said second vertically extending flange on
`said vertical end frame and the beaded portion of
`the other said arms being adapted to connect
`releasably to the beaded portion of a corresponding
`opposed vertically extending flange on a separate
`vertical end frame of a second wall module."
` Did I read that correctly?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And that's the part of claim 1 of the '901
`patent that describes the specific requirements of
`the connecting strip that's used in the DIRTT
`system; right?
` A. Yeah. There is -- there is a third element
`within it, though, which is a fin in between those
`two.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Which is the fundamental difference.
` Q. So the fundamental difference between -- so
`the fundamental difference between what?
` A. What you've been asking me about, about the
`vertical connectors on the LifeSPACE.
`
`

`
`Page 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` G. GOSLING
` Q. So just so I know what you're comparing,
`are you saying the fundamental difference between
`the vertical connector in the Smed wall and -- so,
`sorry. The LifeSPACE wall had a vertical connector
`that did not include a fin and --
` A. It was, yeah, it was -- I mean, it was
`different beyond that, right, but you are just
`stopping halfway through this.
` Q. Sure.
` And you can -- you can take a look through,
`if you'd like, but I -- you k

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket