throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________
`
`
`
`HNI CORPORATION and ALLSTEEL INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`DIRTT ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS LTD.
`Patent Owner.
`
`___________
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01691
`Patent No. 8,024,901
`Issue Date: September 27, 2011
`
`Title: INTEGRATED RECONFIGURABLE WALL SYSTEM
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF GEOFF GOSLING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-1
` IPR2015-01691
`
`

`
`
`
`I, Geoff Gosling, hereby state and declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am the lead inventor of U.S. Patent No. 8,024,901 (“the ’901
`
`patent”).
`
`2.
`
`I understand that the broadest claim of the ’901 patent reads as
`
`follows:
`
`1. A movable reconfigurable wall system comprising:
`
`a) at least one wall module having a front and rear surface and top, bottom,
`
`right side and left side edges, said at least one wall module having:
`
`i) a vertical end frame disposed adjacent to each of said right and left
`
`side edges, each vertical end frame having a first vertically extending
`
`flange and a spaced apart second vertically extending flange thereon,
`
`each of said first vertically extending flange and said second vertically
`
`extending flange having a beaded portion, the beaded portion on one
`
`of said first vertically extending flange or said second vertically
`
`extending flange extending toward the front surface of the wall
`
`module and the beaded portion on the other of said first vertically
`
`extending flange or said second vertically extending flange extending
`
`toward the rear surface of the wall module;
`
`ii) a plurality of horizontal stringers affixed between said vertical end
`
`frames at said right and left side edges; and
`
`-2-
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-2
` IPR2015-01691
`
`

`
`iii) an aesthetic surface affixed to said stringers; and
`
`b) a removable connecting strip having a pair of spaced apart flexible arms,
`
`each arm having a beaded portion thereon, the beaded portion of one of
`
`said arms being adapted to connect releasably to the beaded portion of
`
`one of said first vertically extending flange or said second vertically
`
`extending flange on said vertical end frame and the beaded portion of the
`
`other of said arms being adapted to connect releasably to the beaded
`
`portion of a corresponding opposed vertically extending flange on a
`
`separate vertical end frame of a second wall module, a wall bracket, a
`
`finishing trim or a connection post to hold one of said first vertically
`
`extending flange or said second vertically extending flange and said
`
`opposed vertically extending flange together, the beaded portions of said
`
`first vertically extending flange or said second vertically extending flange
`
`and said opposed vertically extending flange fitting inside the arms of
`
`said connecting strip to hold said first vertically extending flange or said
`
`second vertically extending flange and said opposed vertically extending
`
`flange together thereby releasably connecting said at least one wall
`
`module to the other of said second wall module, wall bracket, finishing
`
`trim or connection post.
`
`-3-
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-3
` IPR2015-01691
`
`

`
`3.
`
`I am currently Vice President of Product Development at DIRTT
`
`Environmental Solutions Ltd. (“DIRTT”) and was one of the founders of DIRTT in
`
`early 2004. Claim 1 of the ’901 patent describes the core of the movable
`
`reconfigurable wall design that DIRTT introduced to the market in 2005 as the
`
`DIRTT Modular Wall System.
`
`4. When DIRTT first introduced the DIRTT Modular Wall System, I
`
`remember several people reacting with varying levels of shock or disbelief because
`
`they could not believe the customization that the DIRTT Modular Wall System
`
`allowed was possible. For example, Danni Livingston was the Facilities Manager
`
`for Johnson County, Kansas, working on finding movable walls for a new Johnson
`
`County Building. Johnson County was looking for walls that could be moved and
`
`whose “skin” could be changed easily so that walls could be repaired and/or the
`
`aesthetics changed over time. But Johnson County was having trouble finding
`
`movable walls that could meet the combination of all of the functional and
`
`aesthetic needs that it had. For example, Johnson County’s Deputy Director of
`
`Facilities had sketched a design with horizontal lines for the moveable wall system,
`
`but Danni had to remind him that in the moveable wall world at that time, all of the
`
`aesthetics were vertical. Johnson County had decided that their need for the
`
`functionality of moveable walls was more important than their aesthetic desires.
`
`But then Danni saw DIRTT’s debut booth at the NeoCon trade show in Chicago in
`
`-4-
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-4
` IPR2015-01691
`
`

`
`September 2005, and saw that the DIRTT Modular Wall System, with its use of
`
`horizontal stringers, allowed horizontal aesthetics and had all of the other
`
`functional features that Johnson County wanted. Johnson County decided to drop
`
`the moveable wall manufacturer that they had been pursuing and decided to adopt
`
`the DIRTT Modular Wall System. In 2010, DIRTT produced a video case study
`
`about
`
`the
`
`Johnson County project, which
`
`is currently available at
`
`http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v76bXwwngnE. A transcript of the audio of
`
`this video clip (with selected accompanying screenshots) is submitted with this
`
`declaration as Exhibit 2005. Those images show construction of a number of the
`
`DIRTT Modular Walls at the Johnson County Building as well as a number of the
`
`walls after construction was complete. The end frames, horizontal stringers,
`
`aesthetic surfaces, and connecting strips described in claim 1 of the ’901 patent are
`
`shown in those images.
`
`5.
`
`Because of stories like Johnson County’s, the DIRTT Modular Wall
`
`System was an amazing commercial success. Within about one year after
`
`introduction of the DIRTT Modular Wall System in late 2005, DIRTT was already
`
`generating annual revenue attributable to sales of the DIRTT Modular Wall System
`
`of about $20 million (Canadian). The annual revenue of DIRTT attributable to the
`
`sales of the DIRTT Modular Wall System rapidly rose from about $20 million in
`
`2006 to about $83 million in 2009 (out of total revenue of about $93 million) and
`
`-5-
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-5
` IPR2015-01691
`
`

`
`to over $212 million in 2015 (out of total revenue of about $236 million). When
`
`DIRTT started in early 2004, there were only 3 employees. By 2009, DIRTT
`
`employed over 450 people, and by the end of 2015, DIRTT had over 870
`
`employees.
`
`6.
`
`In September 2010, I was awarded the 2010 Manning Innovation
`
`Award, which is a $10,000 award given to recognize and encourage innovation in
`
`Canada, for my role in creating the DIRTT Modular Wall System. The group that
`
`grants the Manning Award maintains a website providing information about the
`
`2010 award, including the criteria that they use to assess who to give the award to,
`
`a “News Release” about the award and the DIRTT Modular Wall System, a
`
`“Media Backgrounder” about DIRTT and the DIRTT Modular Wall System, and a
`
`video clip about DIRTT and the DIRTT Modular Wall System. The page of the
`
`Manning Award website
`
`providing
`
`information
`
`about my
`
`award
`
`(http://www.manningawards.ca/en/awards/winners/2010/geoff-gosling) has been
`
`reproduced and submitted with this declaration as Exhibit 2006. A transcript of a
`
`video clip on that page (along with selected screenshots from the video clip) has
`
`been prepared and submitted with this declaration as Exhibit 2007. These
`
`screenshots show a number of the components used in the DIRTT Modular Wall
`
`System, which are also components described and shown in the ’901 patent. For
`
`example, the screenshots show the end frames, flanges, beaded portions, horizontal
`
`-6-
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-6
` IPR2015-01691
`
`

`
`stringers, and aesthetic surfaces described in claim 1 of the ’901 patent, along with
`
`the snap-fit connections used to attach tiles to horizontal stringers. The page of the
`
`Manning Award website providing information about the criteria used to assess to
`
`whom
`
`the
`
`Award
`
`should
`
`be
`
`given
`
`(http://www.manningawards.ca/en/apply/scoring-criteria) has been reproduced and
`
`submitted with this declaration as Exhibit 2008.
`
`7.
`
`In signing this declaration, I understand that the declaration will be
`
`filed as evidence in a contested case before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office. I acknowledge that I may be
`
`subject to cross examination in the case and that cross examination will take place
`
`within the United States. If cross examination is required of me, I will appear for
`
`cross examination within the United States during the time allotted for cross
`
`examination.
`
`8.
`
`I hereby declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United
`
`States of America that the foregoing statements are true to the best of my
`
`knowledge; and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that
`
`
`
`
`
`-7-
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-7
` IPR2015-01691
`
`

`
`willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code
`
`and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the results of these
`
`proceedings.
`
`
`
`Dated: April 28, 2016
`
`
`
`_____________________________
`Signature of Declarant
`Geoff Gosling
`
`-8-
`
`DIRTT EXHIBIT 2004-8
` IPR2015-01691

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket