throbber
Gut, 1984, 25, 707-710
`
`Effects of single and repeated doses of omeprazole on
`gastric acid and pepsin secretion in man
`
`C W HOWDEN, J A H FORREST, AND J L REID
`
`From the University Department of Materia Medica and Gastroenterology Unit, Stobhill General Hospital,
`Glasgow
`
`SUMMARY The effects of omeprazole, a substituted benzimidazole, on gastric acid and pepsin
`secretion have been studied in twelve healthy subjects. From six to eight hours after a single oral
`dose of 30 mg, there was a 66% reduction in basal acid output, and a 71·2% reduction in
`pentagastrin stimulated acid output. A single dose of 60 mg produced a 91· 7% reduction in basal
`acid output and a 95·3% reduction in pentagastrin stimulated acid output. After seven days
`treatment with 30 or 60 mg daily, there was almost 100% inhibition of both basal and
`pentagastrin stimulated acid output. Omeprazole did not significantly affect pepsin secretion
`which is in keeping with its proposed mode of action, as an inhibitor of the H + /K +-A TPase
`enzyme on the secretory membrane of the parietal cell. There were no side effects after
`omeprazole either with single or repeated dosing.
`
`The substituted benzimidazoles are new agents
`which are potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion.
`They act by selective, non-competitive inhibition of
`the H+1K+-ATPase enzyme in the parietal cell. 1
`This enzyme is the active transport mechanism for
`hydrogen ion secretion in the stomach. Although
`one of these agents, omeprazole, has been shown to
`suppress basal and pentagastrin stimulated acid
`secretion after a single dose/ little is known about
`its effects after repeated dosing. In addition,
`previous studies have used a buffered suspension of
`the drug2 as it is partially inactivated by gastric acid,
`or have looked at its acid inhibitory effect 24 hours
`after a dose. 3
`We have studied the effects of two different doses
`of omeprazole on basal and pentagastrin stimulated
`acid and pepsin secretion after a single dose and
`after seven days of treatment. Capsules of enteric(cid:173)
`coated omeprazole granules were used, and the
`effects studied around the time of expected
`maximum acid inhibition.
`
`Methods
`
`(range 19-34 years) were studied. None had any
`past medical history of note or was on any
`medication. All subjects gave informed written
`consent to the study which was approved by the
`research and ethical committee of the Greater
`Glasgow Health Board, Northern District.
`Subjects were randomly allocated to one of two
`groups. Each received one dose of placebo followed
`after three to five days by either 30 mg or 60 mg of
`omeprazole orally as a single daily dose for seven
`days. Subjects attended the Clinical Pharmacology
`Research Laboratory on three occasions during the
`study: day 0 (placebo); day one (first dose omepra(cid:173)
`zole) and day seven (seventh dose omeprazole). The
`study design was identical on each occasion.
`Subjects arrived fasted at around 0830 hours and
`were given capsules containing enteric-coated
`omeprazole granules or placebo. A standard light
`breakfast was given 15 minutes after drug admini(cid:173)
`stration and the subject remained fasted for the
`remainder of the study day. At around 1415 hours
`(or 5~ hours postdose) a size 16 FG vented nasa(cid:173)
`gastric tube was passed and its position checked by
`means of a water recovery technique. 4 From 1430
`until 1530 hours - that is, from six to seven hours
`postdose - gastric juice was aspirated continuously
`and collected as four 15 minute samples for
`measurement of basal acid output. During the next
`hour, each subject received an intravenous infusion
`of pentagastrin (1·2 JLg/kg/h), and gastric juice was
`707
`
`SUBJECTS
`Twelve healthy male subjects, mean age 25·2 years
`
`Address for correspondence: Dr C W Howden. Deparlment of Materia
`Medica. Stobhill General Hospital. Glasgow G21 3UW. Scotland.
`Received for publication 29 July 1983
`
`

`
`708
`
`Howden, Forrest, and Reid
`
`continuously aspirated and collected as four 15
`minute samples for determination of plateau acid
`output.
`the acid
`Basal acid output was defined as
`produced in the second half of the basal hour
`multiplied by a factor of two,5 and plateau acid
`output as the acid produced in the two consecutive
`highest 15 minute periods of the second hour
`multiplied by a factor of two. An intravenous
`infusion of pentagastrin was used to give a constant
`rate of stimulation , and the dose selected was
`designed to give a near maximal stimulus without
`producing systemic side effects. 6 Acid output was
`determined by titration to pH 7 ·0 with 0·1M sodium
`hydroxide. A small aliquot of gastric juice was taken
`from each sample for estimation of pepsin secretion
`by the method of Berstad. 7 Results are expressed as
`mean ± standard deviation. Statistical comparisons
`were made using the Mann-Whitney U test.
`
`Results
`
`Basal and pentagastrin stimulated acid output after
`placebo were similar in the two groups. A single
`dose of 30 mg produced a 66% reduction in basal
`acid output, and a 71·2% reduction in plateau acid
`output (p<0·01) . The volume of gastric juice was
`reduced by 30·8% in the basal hour (p<0·05) and by
`47 ·1% in response to pentagastrin (p<0·01) . Basal
`pepsin secretion was not significantly altered
`although there was an apparently significant
`_(p<0·05) rise in pepsin secretion in the pentagastrin
`stimulated hour. After seven days of omeprazole 30
`mg daily, basal acid output was reduced by 99·8%
`(p<0·05) and plateau acid output by 98·4%
`(p<0·01) when compared with values following
`placebo. Five of the six subjects produced no acid in
`the basal hour and three remained achlorhydric in
`reponse to pentagastrin. The volume of gastric juice
`
`at the end of the seven day course was reduced by
`54·9% (p<0·01) and 79·2% (p<0·01) in the basal
`and pentagastrin stimulated hours respectively.
`There were no significant changes in pepsin
`secretion either basally or after pentagastrin (Table
`1).
`A single 60 mg dose of omeprazole had a much
`greater effect on acid output reducing basal acid
`output and plateau acid output by 91·7% (p<0·05)
`and 95 ·3% (p<0·01) respectively. Volumes of
`gastric juice secreta! in the basal and pentagastrin
`stimulated hours were reduced by 59·2% (p<0·01)
`and 79·5% (p<O·Ol) respectively. There was no
`significant change in pepsin secretion. After seven
`days treatment with omeprazole 60 mg daily, basal
`acid output was reduced by 99·1% (p<O·Ol) and
`plateau acid output by 99·0% (p<O·Ol). Volumes of
`gastric juice were reduced by 62·3% (p<O·Ol) in the
`basal hour and by 83·8% (p<O·Ol) in the penta(cid:173)
`gastrin stimulated hours. Pepsin secretion did not
`significantly change (Table 2).
`No side effects were encountered with
`omeprazole. Each subject kept a diary for the
`duration of the · study in which they were asked to
`note any adverse events and none was recorded.
`Subjects were also specifically asked about side
`effects on each of the three study days and, again,
`none was reported . Standard biochemical and
`haematological indices were measured before
`inclusion in the study, and were repeated within five
`days of completion of the study. No drug related
`abnormalities were found .
`
`Discussion
`
`These data show that omeprazole, in doses of 30 or
`60 mg daily, is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid
`secretion, when this is assessed around the time of
`expected maximum effect. It has no significant effect
`
`Table 1 Acid and pepsin output and volume of gastric juice after placebo, first dose of 30 mg.omeprazole and seventh dose
`of 30 mg omeprazole. (n=6; mean ± SD)
`
`Basal
`
`Acid
`output
`(mmollh)
`
`4·30
`±3·37
`1·53
`±1·91
`0·01
`±0·02'
`
`Pepsin
`output
`(mglh)
`
`22·2
`±16·4
`17·8
`±12·2
`5·2
`± 4·1
`
`Volume
`(ml)
`
`99·7
`±34·3
`69·0
`±22·6'
`45·0
`±12·0t
`
`Stimulated
`
`Acid
`output
`(mmollh)
`
`35·41
`± 5·45
`10·24
`±10·06t
`0·58
`± 0·99t
`
`Pepsin
`output
`(mglh)
`
`5·4
`± 2·9
`36·8
`±46·1'
`18·3
`±18·8
`
`Volume
`(ml)
`
`302·0
`± 42·7
`159·7
`± 66·8t
`62·7
`± 19·3t
`
`Placebo
`
`First dose
`
`Seventh dose
`
`• p<0·05.
`
`t p<0·01
`
`

`
`Effects of single and repeated doses of omeprazole on gastric acid and pepsin secretion in man
`
`709
`
`Table 2 Acid and pepsin output and volume of gastric juice after placebo, first dose of 60 mg omeprazole and seventh dose
`of60 mg omeprazole. (n=6; mean± SD)
`
`Basal
`
`Acid
`output
`(mmollh)
`
`4·56
`±3·19
`0·38
`±0·49*
`0·04
`±0·09t
`
`Pepsin
`output
`(mglh)
`
`11 ·8
`± 7·5
`13·1
`±17·1
`6·0
`± 5·2
`
`Volume
`(ml)
`
`96·3
`±25-6
`39·3
`±14·0t
`36·3
`± 8·4t
`
`Stimulated
`
`Acid
`output
`(mmollh)
`
`37·11
`±10·64
`1·74
`± 2·28t
`0·37
`± 0·20t
`
`Pepsin
`output
`(mglh)
`
`5·5
`± 6·2
`35·2
`±18·8
`24·6
`±18·5
`
`Volume
`(ml)
`
`297·3
`± 62·5
`61·0
`± 25·2t
`48·3
`± 10·2t
`
`Placebo
`
`First dose
`
`Seventh dose
`
`• p<0·05.
`
`t p<O·Ol
`
`on pepsin secretion. This is consistent with the
`proposed mechanism and site of action of the drug.
`Sixty milligrams of omeprazole produced a
`greater inhibitory effect than 30 mg after a single
`dose. This is in agreement with previous work which
`has shown a prolonged inhibition of gastric acid
`secretion which is dose-dependent. 2 After seven
`days of treatment, there was no difference between
`the two dose levels with the majority of our subjects
`being achlorhydric -
`that is, pH of gastric juice
`>7·0, in the basal hour, and the response to
`pentagastrin being inhibited by around 99%. This
`would be consistent with an increasing response with
`time as a consequence of accumulation of the effect
`of omeprazole, which for a single dose normally
`exceeds 24 hours.
`The reduction in the volume of gastric juice
`secreted after omeprazole was not of the same
`magnitude as the reduction in acid output. There
`was no concomitant reduction in pepsin secretion.
`These observations suggest that other components
`of the gastric secretion are relatively unaltered by
`omeprazole, and give further evidence for the drug's
`highly specific site and mode of action. The lack of
`reduction in pepsin secretion is unlikely to be of
`clinical importance as pepsin would be biologically
`inactive in the absence of intragastric acid.
`It is of considerable interest that the drug had no
`observed haematological, biochemical, or subjective
`side effects, despite its extremely powerful action on
`gastric acid secretion. Omeprazole has now been
`given
`to ~atients with
`the Zollinger-EIIison
`syndrome8 with good
`therapeutic effect and
`without side effects. Clearly, a degree of caution is
`necessary with any new agent, but clinical trials in
`patients with active peptic ulceration seem
`indicated. The optimum dose for ulcer healing
`remains to be found but our studies indicate that
`even 30 mg omeprazole daily produces a degree of
`
`inhibition of acid secretion in excess of that seen
`with H2 receptor antagonists. 10 11 The H2 receptor
`antagonists do not have an increasing effect with
`time.
`Although most of our subjects had basal
`achlorhydria after seven days treatment, we were
`assessing basal secretion around the time of the
`drug's maximal inhibitory effect. Other workers3
`have found degrees of acid inhibition of the order of
`30% 24 hours after a single dose, and have
`commented that the acid inhibitory effect reached a
`peak after five days treatment. It seems unlikely,
`therefore, that prolonged periods of achlorhydria
`would occur on long term treatment.
`Omeprazole is a powerful inhibitor of gastric acid
`secretion in man, and a potentially useful agent in
`peptic ulcer.
`
`This work has been presented in part to the Medical
`Research Society in January 1983 (C/in Sci 1983; 64:
`74p) and to the British Society of Gastroenterology
`in April1983 (Gut 1983; 24: A498).
`
`Capsules of omeprazole and placebo were supplied
`by Astra Pharmaceuticals.
`
`References
`
`1 Fellenius E, Berglindh T, Sachs G et a/. Substituted
`benzimidazoles inhibit gastric secretion by blocking
`(H++ K+) ATPase. Nature 1981; 290: 159-61.
`2 Lind T, Cederberg C, Ekenved G et a/. Effect of
`omeprazole - a gastric proton pump inhibitor - on
`pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in man. Gut
`1983; 24: 270-6.
`3 Muller P, Dammann HG, Seitz H et a/. Effect of
`
`

`
`710
`
`Howden, Forrest, and Reid
`
`repeated once daily, oral omeprazole on gastric
`secretion. Lancet 1983; I: 66

`4 Hassan M, Hobsley M. Positioning of subject and of
`nasogastric tube during a gastric secretion study. Br
`Med J 1970; 1: 45~.
`5 Faber RG, Hobsley M. Basal gastric secretion: repro(cid:173)
`ducibility and relationship with duodenal ulceration .
`Gut 1977; 18: 57-63.
`6 Mason MC, Giles GR, Clark CG . Continuous intra(cid:173)
`venous pentagastrin as a stimulant of maximal gastric
`acid secretion. Gut 1969; 10: 34-8.
`7 Berstad A . A modified haemaglobin substrate method
`for the estimation of pepsin in gastric juice. Scand J
`Gastroenterol1970; 5: 343-8.
`
`8 Bianchi A, Delchier JC, Soule JC et al. Control of
`acute Zollinger-Ellison syndrome with intravenous
`omeprazole. Lancet 1982; 2: 1223-4.
`9 Oberg K, Lindstrom H. Reduction of gastric hyper(cid:173)
`secretion in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome with
`omeprazole. Lancet 1983; 1: 66--7 .
`10 Burland WL, Duncan WAM, Hesselbo T et at.
`PharmacQlogical evaluation of cimetidine, a new
`histamine.H2-receptor antagonist, in healthy man. Br J
`Clin Pharmacal 1975; 2: 481-6.
`11 Peden NR, Saunders JHB, Wormsley KG. Inhibition
`of pentagastrin-stimulated and nocturnal gastric
`secretion by ranitidine, a new Hrreceptor antagonist.
`Lancet 1979; 1: 69~2.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket