Case 9:12-cv—81183-KAM Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2012 Page 1 of 1
`
`TO:
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § lll6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Southern District Of Florida
`on the following
`[I Trademarks or
`[ZPatents.
`( I] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`12—cv-81 183-KAM
`PLAINTIFF
`Micron Electronics, LLC
`
`DATE FILED
`10/24/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Southern District of Florida
`
`DEFENDANT
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`3
`
`El Amendment
`
`I:I Answer
`
`[I Cross Bill
`
`D Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DEClSlON/JUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`Bonnie J. Bernard
`
`DATE
`
`10/25/2012
`
`Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director
`Cogy
`document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`Pag
`
`NOVATEL EXHIBIT 1007
`
`Page 1 of 858
`
`NOVATEL EXHIBIT 1007
`
`

`

`Case 1:12—cv-23876-FAM Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2012 Page 1 of 1
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`TO.
`'
`
`Man stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Southern District of Florida
`on the following
`D Trademarks or
`|ZPatents.
`( E] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`12-cv-23876-Moreno
`PLAINTIFF
`DEFENDANT
`
`ArrivalStar S.A. et al
`
`DATE FILED
`10/24/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Southern District of Florida
`
`Groupon, inc.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`16~952i645B'
`
`
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`to/4/2005
` —
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__ D
`
`
`
`
`
`ATE INCLUDED
`
`TRESEAIKTRERNO
`
`l
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`El Amendment
`%’;TERCfD%AI$/RE:
`
`
`
`
`El Answer
`E] Cross Bill
`I] Other Pleading
`HOLDER OF PATENT 0R TRADEMARK
`
`In the above——entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`Steven M. Larlmore
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`Valerie Kemp
`
`DATE
`
`10/24/2012
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—~Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—U on filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`Page 2 o 858
`
`Page 2 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 2:12—cv—OO333-DBH Document 5 Filed 10/31/12 Page 1 of 1 Page|D #: 419
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Portland, Maine
`on the following
`[:1 Trademarks or
`MPatents.
`I:] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`DATE FILED
`10/30/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Portland, Maine
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`2:12-CV—333-DBH
`DEFENDANT
`PLAINTIFF
`Microsoft Corporation
`Surfcast Inc
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 Us 6724-403 B1
`4/20/2004
`2 US 7,933,632 B2
`4/26/2011
`Microsoft Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`I] Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`[I Answer
`El Cross Bill
`C] Other Pleading
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1
`
`
`
`In the above~—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`Christa K. Berry
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`/s/ Robert Allen
`
`DATE
`
`10/31/2012
`
`Copy 1—-Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4———Case file copy
`
`Page 3 of 858
`
`Page 3 of 858
`
`

`

`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1] 16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the District of Delaware
`on the following
`I] Trademarks or
`[ZPatents.
`( [I the patent action involves 35
`§ 2792.’):
`DOCKET NO.
`DATE FILED
`1/13/2012
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`for the District of Delaware
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00030-UNA Document 3
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10)
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of1 PagelD #: 53
`
`
`
`
`
`TO
`'
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 223l3—1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`T“ T W
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS, LLC
`
`SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC., SIERRA
`WIRELESS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`..
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—£ntitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`U Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[I Answer
`
`[I Cross Bill
`
`I] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`—
`
`
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`In the above~entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`Page 4 of 858
`
`Page 4 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00052-LMB-TRJ Document 3
`A0 120 (Rev, (léifiéii
`
`Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of1 PagelD# 162
`
`Mi‘/(‘)'
`1
`‘
`
`Director of the
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Patient and ‘Trademark ()ffice
`P.0. Box I450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`()a’\’ Tlfli
`RI€POR’I‘
`FIEANCC OR i)I7.'TERi\’IlNATI()N OF AN
`AC'I‘I(')%\’ 1'{f2‘.(jARi)Ii\'(; A l’A'l‘I§{\”l‘ OR
`’f'}{A_]){§_V1A]{|{
`
`In Cmnplimicc with 35 l?.$.(J. § 29!) zimlihr I5 U,.‘s'.(.7. § 1 I 16 you are ilcrcby :vJ\'i:<cs.l that it court action has been
`lilcd in the Us. I)i,<irie.~1 Court
`for the Eastern Disirici of Virginia
`__
`mé1iic1hii0x\i1i§_~
`[:3 l‘rzuic:x1ui'ks or
`{:2} i’awnts.
`( (3 ii§';%'”.mm ;{$i'i'}$;§ ’é.ma1§?;~;’3's i":.s.<:)'V"§"éi2z.;;
`
`I‘)()(‘Ki€T NO.
`
`i-’i..~\i?~;i'1H*‘
`
`i).«\Ti£ FlLi~:[)
`
`{L8, DiS'i‘{i(."i' C0\.}R'i'
`_
`’
`for the Eastern District of Virinia
`Dlii‘i~1Z\ii):\:‘\"i‘
`
`Automated Tracking Solutions, LLC
`
`Simp|yRFiD. Inc.
`
`
`
`l’,»\I”"l‘.?xl DR
`;.RM.mM;,mK NO‘
`
`DA'l'ii(V)l’l"/\'l'I{?\§’l"
`OR ‘RADEMARK
`
`i
`,
`Ii0l.i)i.R Oi
`
`,
`
`.
`7
`,
`.. 5,.
`i’x‘.|i,?\l (JR iR:\i)I.?\l.-\Rl\
`
`-—
`
`DA! Ii L\'(.')l.U1.)i{l)
`
`In 111: zibmc -cmitiL'd cam‘. thc {ulimx mg; p1iiclIi{1«)' 1maia:m:::'i».(:») hm. c la-can inciudcii:
`lNCI.l3l')i*’,l) HY
`
`C} (Tmsa mu
`
`[:1 ()r.iu:ri‘ic;1dir2g
`
`l’z\l'ii;\‘I UR
`I l{.«\!')ii,\1.v\RK N0.
`
`i.'}.>\Tli OF i’.»‘\’lVi€N I’
`
`(JR l‘i(AI,)l:‘.:\1z\RK
` C‘L1’.RK
`
`In the uhuvc mcmitlci! case. the fnllmving dccisimi has been rcndcrccl nrjudgcum-n1 ismuxit
`1\)i{(}.'i§i()X~‘.Ii.Ei.)(il§MIi?‘5'l‘
`
`(BY) 1)]-L!’l£'i‘Y (,‘.l(i<‘.l(K
`
`Cupy I---Ugwu initiation ufaciinn. mail this copy to Director Copy 3-Upon termination ofzmion. muii ihis mm’ to lliirecmr
`("om 2~~-Upon filing document adding pment(s), mail this copy to Director
`(Tony 4m-(Jase file copy
`
`Page 5 of 858
`
`Page 5 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00031-UNA Document 3
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of1 Page|D #: 53
`
`A0 120 Rev. OS/I0)
`
`
`
`TO‘
`
`Mai] stop 3
`Director ofthe U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.o. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.SrC. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the District of Delaware
`on the following
`E] Trademarks or
`MPatents.
`( [I the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292-."):
`DOCKET NO.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`CINTERION WIRELESS MODULES GMBH, ClNTER|ON
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS, LLC
`WIRELESS MODULES NAFTA LLC, GEMALTO N.V.
`
`
`
`DATE FILED
`1/13/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`for the District of Delaware
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`1 7,583,197
`
`9/1/2009
`
`
`.
`W
`
`
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`2 8,094,010
`
`1/10/2012
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`3——
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`Ci Amendment
`E] Answer
`[I Cross Bill
`Ij Other Pleading
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`l--
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`_——_ I
`
`
`
`n the abOve—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l———Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3--Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——-Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-—-Case file copy
`
`Page 6 of 858
`
`Page 6 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00032-UNA Document 3
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of1 Page|D #: 53
`
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the District of Delaware
`on the following
`
`[:I Trademarks or
`
`MPatents.
`
`( E! the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS, LLC
`
`DATE FILED
`1/13/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`for the District of Delaware
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`ENFORA, INC., NOVATEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS,
`INC., NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`1 7,583,197
`
`9/1/2009
`
`
`
`'
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`2 8,094,010
`
`1/1o/2012
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`3——
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above——entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`El Amendment
`I] Answer
`El Cross Bill
`E] Other Pleading
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`I--
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___— I
`
`n the aboVe—£ntitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——-Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`Page 7 of 858
`
`Page 7 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 3:11-cv-O1060—HZ Document 18
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 1 Page ID#: 94
`
`A0120 Rev. 08/10
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`TO:
`
`Mai] stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Oregon
`on the following
`I] Trademarks or
`[:1 Patents.
`( I:]The patent action in:/olves 35 U.S.C. §
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`
`3:11—cv—1060
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`St. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
`Metabolic Maintenance Products, Inc.
`
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`DATE FILED
`8/31/2011
`
`Oreon
`
`
`
`
`
`%*;TfRiFD:’3§E£
`8/3/2°04
`8/18/1998 —
`3 —
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`[I Answer
`
`I] Cross Bill
`
`C] Other Pleading
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`I:] Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`———
`——
`——
`_—
`
`——
`
`In the above-~entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/IUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`Mary L Moran
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`Page 8 of 858
`
`Page 8 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00033-UNA Document 3
`A0120 Rev. 08/10
`
`
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 1 Page|D #: 56
`
`T0:
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1 I 16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the District Of Delaware
`on the following
`El Trademarks or M Patents.
`( El the patent action involves 35 U.S.C, § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`DATE FILED
`1/13 /2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`for the District of Delaware
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS, LLC
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., TELIT
`COMMUNICATIONS PLC, TELIT WIRELESS
`SOLUTIONS INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,583,197
`
`9/1/2009
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`3—
`
`—
`
`
`——
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above~entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`D Answer
`
`El Cross Bill
`
`D Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`
`Page 9 of 858
`
`Page 9 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 1:12—cv-00034-UNA Document3
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page1 oft Page|D #: 52
`
` TO.
`
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 11 I6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`E] Trademarks or
`IZPatents.
`
`for the District Of Delaware
`[:1 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`on the following
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`1/13/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`for the District of Delaware
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS, LLC
`
`SIMCOM WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD., SIM
`TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,583,197
`
`9/1/2009
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`3 4 I
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`Page 10 of 858
`
`n the above~entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`El Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[:1 Answer
`
`B Cross Bill
`
`[I Other Pleading
`.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00031-UNA Document 3
`A0 I20 Rev. 08/10)
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of1 Page|D #: 53
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`To
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the District of Delaware
`on the following
`I] Trademarks or
`MPatents.
`[:1 the patent actionT1Tvolves 35 U.S.C. § 292.‘):
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`DATE FILED
`1/13/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`for the District of Delaware
`
`.
`
`V.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`PLAINTIFF
`
`
`CINTERION WIRELESS MODULES GMBH, CINTERION
`M2M SOLUTIONS, LLC
`WIRELESS MODULES NAFTA LLC, GEMALTO N.V.
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`——
`
`——
`
`
`—
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`[:I Amendment
`El Answer
`[I Cross Bill
`[:1 Other Pleading
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`in the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—-Case file copy
`
`Page 11 of 858
`
`Page 11 of 858
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-00032-UNA Document 3
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10)
`
`Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of1 Page|D #: 53
`
`
`
`
`
`T0:
`
`Mai] stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1 I 16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`for the District Of Delaware
`filed in the US. District Court
`[I Trademarks or
`MPatents. I ( [I the patent action involves 35 U.S.C.A§ 292.):
`
`mm
`
`on the following
`
`"L
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`DATE FILED
`1/13/2012
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`for the District of Delaware
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`
`MZM SOLUTIONS, LLC
`ENFORA, INC., NOVATEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS,
`
`INC., NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`I
`
`.
`
`1 7,583,197
`
`2 8,094,010
`
`9/1/2009
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`1/10/2012
`
`M2M Solutions, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`————
`
`In the above—~entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—~Case file copy
`
`Page 12 of 858
`
`3——
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`El Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`I--
`
`I:] Answer
`
`I] Cross Bill
`
`[3 Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 858
`
`

`

`
`§¢§'I AND1k‘a
`
`
`
`
`
`§s§§§
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandtia, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`urphy & Timbers LLP
`Sunstein Kann
`125 SUMM*.R SlR*.*.l
`BOSTON,
`.A.02ll -1618
`
`Mai]_:jate; O4/QT7/2010
`
`: Eveline Wesby Van Swaay
`Applicant
`: 7583197
`Patent Number
`: 09/01/2009
`Issue Date
`Application No: 11/329,212
`Filed
`: 01/10/2006
`
`: DECTSIOW ON R«QU«S1 EOR
`: RECA.CU.ATIOW of PATENT
`: TERM ADJUSTD/IE\TT IN VIEW
`INl.LNl 10
`: OF WYET-I AND \iOJ.IC.L or
`:
`IssU~. C~.R1IrICA1E or CORREClION
`
`The Request for Recalculation is GRANTED to the extent irdicated.
`
`I)
`term adjustment has been determined to be 0 days. The USPTO will sua
`The patent
`sponte issue a cerLiZicaLe 0
`correction re‘
`'ecting the amount o:
`PTA days
`determined by the recalculation.
`
`the USPTO wiii a""ord
`the cerLiZicaLe o_ correction,
`Prior to the issuance o_
`patentee an opportunity to be heard.
`and.
`request
`reconsideratior. Accordingly,
`patentee has one month or
`thirty (30) days, whichever
`is Longer,
`to file a
`request
`for
`reconsideration of
`this patent
`term adjustment calculation. See 35
`U.S.C.
`l54(b)(3)(3)(ii)
`and 37 CFR l.322(a)(4). No extensions o‘
`time wi'1 be
`granted under 37 CFR 1.136.
`
`Patentee should use documert code PET.OP it e'ectronicai1y Siiirg a request Zor
`reconsideration. of
`this patent
`termi adjustment calculatior. The patentee must
`also include the information required by 37 CF? l.705(b)(2) ard the See required
`by 37 CFR ;.l8(e). "" patentee does not file a timely request Zor reconsideration
`of this patent Lerm adjustmert calculation including the injormation required by
`37 CF? l.705(b)(2) and the fee required by 37 CFR l.l8(e),
`the USPTO will issie a
`certijicate o" correction re
`ecLing the PTA determination noted above.
`
`to review in the
`in order to preserve the right
`Patentee should be aware that
`the USPTO patent
`Jnited States District Court Zor
`the District o‘ Co'umbia o‘
`term adjustment determination, patentee must ensure ttat he or she also take the
`steps required under 35 U.S.C.
`l5—(b)(4)(A)
`in a timely manner. Nothing in the
`request Zor recalculation should be construed as providing an alternative time
`—rame ‘or commencing a civil action under 35 U.S.C.
`l5—(b)(4)(A).
`
`‘ted to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PTOL—549G (04/10)
`Page 13 of 858
`
`Page 13 of 858
`
`

`

`Doc Code: PET.PTA.RCAL
`
`PTO/SB/131 (01-10)
`Document Description: Request for Recalculation in view of Wyeth
`Approved for use through 02/28/2011. OMB 0651-0020
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`REQUEST FOR RECALCULATION OF PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT
`IN VIEW OF WYETH*
`
`Attorney Docket
`Number: 1
`
`(or371(b) or (f) Date): January 10, 2006
`First Named
`Inventor: Wesby-Van SW38}/, EVeNne
`
`T‘“e= Programmable Communicator
`
`Patent Number: 7,583, 1
`
`‘M’ Date September 1, 2009
`
`PATENTEE HEREBY REQUESTS RECALCULATION OF THE PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT (PTA)
`UNDER 35 USC 154(b) INDICATED ON THE ABOVE-IDENTIFIED PATENT. THE PATENTEE’S
`SOLE BASIS FOR REQUESTING THE RECALCULATION IS THE USPTO’S PRE-WYETH
`
`INTERPRETATION OF 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A).
`
`Note: This form is only for requesting a recalculation of PTA for patents issued before
`March 2, 2010, if the sole basis for requesting the recalculation is the USPTO’s pre- Wyeth
`interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A). See Instruction Sheet on page 2 for more
`information.
`
`Patentees are reminded that to preserve the right to review in the United States District Court
`for the District of Columbia of the USPTO’s patent term adjustment determination, a patentee
`must ensure that he or she also takes the steps required under 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3) and (b)(4)
`and 37 CFR 1.705 in a timely manner.
`
`*Wyeth v. Kappos, No. 2009-1120 (Fed. Cir., Jan. 7, 2010).
`
`Sinatme /Jonathan C. Lovely, #60,821/
`“am:-Jonathanc-Lovely
`
`Date February 9, 2010
`
`Note: Signatures of all the inventors or assignees of record of the entire interest or their representative(s) are required in accordance with 37
`CFR 1.33 and 11.18. Please see 37 CFR 1.4(d) for the form of the signature. If necessary, submit multiple forms for more than one signature,
`see below*.
`
`*Tota| N4 forms are submitted.
`
`The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by
`35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed
`application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount oftime you require to complete this form and/or
`suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box
`1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O.
`Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 and select option 2.
`
`Page 14 of 858
`
`Page 14 of 858
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/131 (01-10)
`Approved for use through 02/28/2011. OMB 0651-0020
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`Instruction Sheet for:
`
`REQUEST FOR RECALCULATION OF PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT
`IN VIEW OF WYETH*
`(Not to be Submitted to the USPTO)
`
`This form is only for requesting a recalculation of PTA for patents issued
`before March 2, 2010, if the sole basis for requesting the recalculation is the USPTO’s
`pre-Wyeth interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A).
`
`This form must be filed within 180 days of the day the patent was granted, with the
`following exception:
`
`Patentees who received a decision from the USPTO under the USPTO’s pre-Wyeth
`interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A) may file a request for reconsideration of that decision if
`such a request for reconsideration is filed within two months of the date of the decision (37
`CFR 1.181(f)).
`If the patentee’s sole basis for requesting reconsideration of the decision is the
`USPTO’s pre-Wyeth interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A), the request for reconsideration
`need only state that reconsideration is being requested in view of Wyeth (this form may be
`used for this purpose if it is filed within two months of the date of the decision from the
`USPTO).
`
`Do not use this form if the application has been allowed, but not yet issued as a
`patent.
`
`1. For patents issued before March 2, 2010: A request for reconsideration under 37 CFR
`1.705(d) and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.18(e) are not required, provided that the patentee’s
`sole basis for requesting recalculation of the PTA in the patent is the USPTO’s pre-Wyeth
`interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A) and this form is filed within 180 days of the day the patent
`was granted.
`
`For patents issued on or after March 2, 2010 (do not use this form): Patentees seeking a
`revised PTA in a patent issued on or after March 2, 2010, must file a request for reconsideration
`under 37 CFR 1.705(d) that complies with the requirements of 37 CFR 1.705(b)(1) and (b)(2)
`within two months of the day the patent issued.
`
`For more information, see “Notice Concerning Calculation of the Patent Term Adjustment
`With Respect to the Overlapping Delay Provision of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A)” available on the
`USPTO Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/Iaw/notices/2010.jsp.
`
`*Wyeth v. Kappos, No. 2009-1120 (Fed. Cir., Jan. 7, 2010).
`
`Page 15 of 858
`
`Page 15 of 858
`
`

`

`Privacy Act Statement
`
`The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection
`with your submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly,
`pursuant to the requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the
`collection of this information is 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary;
`and (3) the principal purpose for which the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark
`Office is to process and/or examine your submission related to a patent application or patent.
`If you do
`not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may not be able to
`process and/or examine your submission, which may result in termination of proceedings or
`abandonment of the application or expiration of the patent.
`
`The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:
`
`1.
`
`The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the
`Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from
`this system of records may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether
`disclosure of these records is required by the Freedom of Information Act.
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of
`presenting evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to
`opposing counsel in the course of settlement negotiations.
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of
`Congress submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the
`individual has requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter of the
`record.
`
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the
`Agency having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of
`information shall be required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as
`amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).
`A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in
`this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the
`World Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal
`agency for purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to
`the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 218(c)).
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator,
`General Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as
`part of that agency’s responsibility to recommend improvements in records management
`practices and programs, under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. Such disclosure shall
`be made in accordance with the GSA regulations governing inspection of records for this
`purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or Commerce) directive. Such disclosure shall not
`be used to make determinations about individuals.
`
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after
`either publication of the application pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 151. Further, a record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37
`CFR 1.14, as a routine use, to the public if the record was filed in an application which
`became abandoned or in which the proceedings were terminated and which application is
`referenced by either a published application, an application open to public inspection or an
`issued patent.
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State,
`or local law enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential
`violation of law or regulation.
`
`Page 16 of 858
`
`Page 16 of 858
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`PROGRAMMABLE COMMUNICATOR
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Eveline Wesby Van Swaay
`
`Customer Number:
`
`02101
`
`Jonathan Lovely
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`1503/105
`
`Payment information:
`
`
`
`File Listing:
`
`Document
`
`Information:
`
`Page 17 of 858
`
`.
`
`.
`
`File Size(Bytes)/
`
`Multi
`
`Pages
`
`Miscellaneous Incoming Letter
`
`c97c57cd25c894796d9238b658cl 7683709
`8c4bc
`
`Page 17 of 858
`
`

`

`Total Files Size (in bytes)
`
`49541
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO ofthe indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`lfa new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`lfa timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/E0/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`lfa new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and ofthe International Filing Date (Form PCT/R0/105) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`Page 18 of 858
`
`Page 18 of 858
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`11/329,212
`
`ISSUE DATE
`
`09/01/2009
`
`2101
`
`7590
`
`08/12/2009
`
`Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP
`125 SUMMER STREET
`BOSTON, MA 02110-1618
`
`PATENT NO.
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`7583197
`
`1503/105
`
`6667
`
`The projected patent number and issue date are specified above.
`
`ISSUE NOTIFICATION
`
`Determination of Patent Term