throbber
Paper No.
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ENFORA, INC., NOVATEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC., and
`NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.
`
`Petitioners,
`
`V.
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR20l 5—0l672
`
`Patent No. 8,648,717 B2
`
`SECOND DECLARATION OF MICHELLE A. MORAN
`
`Mail Stop “PA TENTBOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`1
`
`M2M
`
`EX. 2009
`
`1
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2009
`
`

`

`Declaration of Michelle A. Moran
`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,648,717
`
`1. 1, Michelle A. Moran, resident of Waukesha, WI, hereby declare as
`
`follows:
`
`2. I am an attorney at Foley & Lardner LLP and one of the attorneys for the
`
`patent owner in this inter partes review.
`
`3. On information and belief, the Exhibits submitted with the Patent Owner’s
`
`Supplemental Brief for the above—referenced inter partes review as Exhibits 2005
`
`and 2008 are true and correct copies of the original documents and Exhibits 2006 —
`
`2007 are true and correct copies of excerpts of the original documents as show in
`
`the table below.
`
`Ex. #
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`Exhibit
`
`Memorandum Order, dated October 2, 2015, M2M Solutions LLC v. 1
`Sierra Wireless America, et al., Case No. 12-030—RGA (DED),
`
`ECF 215
`Excerpts of the Declaration of Dr. Ray W. Nettleton in Support of
`Plaintiff’ s Answer to Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of
`the Court’s Claim Constructions of“Processing Module” and
`“Programmable Interface,” dated August 3, 2015, filed in M2M
`Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless America, et al., Case No. 12-030-
`
`RGA (DED), ECF 197
`Excerpts of the Declaration of Marc N. Henschke in Support of
`Plaintiffs Answer to Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of
`the Court’s Claim Constructions of “Processing Module” and
`“Programmable Interface,” dated August 3, 2015, filed in M2M
`Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless America, et al., Case No. 12-030-
`
`RGA (DED), ECF 196
`Plaintiff s Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion
`for Reconsideration of the Court’s Claim Construction of
`“Processing Module” and “Programmable Interface” Based on the
`Federal Circuit En Banc Decision in Williamson v. Citrix Online,
`
`2
`
`M2M
`
`Ex. 2009
`
`2
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2009
`
`

`

`l Case No. 12-030-RGA (DED), ECF 195
`
`4.
`
`I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
`
`States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that all statement made
`
`of my own knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and
`
`belief are believed to be true.
`
`I understand that willful false statements and the like
`
`are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both (18 U.S.C. § 1001).
`
`Executed this
`
`day of January, 2016
`
`( «¢helle A. Moran
`
`3
`
`M2M
`
`EX. 2009
`
`3
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2009
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket