IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAW ARE
`
`C.A. No. 12-030-RGA
`
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`C.A. No. 12-032-RGA
`
`C.A. No. 12-033-RGA
`
`)
`
`))
`
`))
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)))
`
`))
`
`))
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`)))
`
`))
`
`))
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`))
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SIERRA W IRELESS AMERICA,INC. and
`SIERRA W IRELESS,INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ENFORA,INC.,NOVATELW IRELESS
`SOLUTIONS,INC.,and NOVATEL
`W IRELESS,INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS,INC.,TELIT
`COMMUNICATIONS PLC,and TELIT
`W IRELESS SOLUTIONS INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. RAY W . NETTLETON IN SUPPORT
`OF PLAINTIFF’S ANSW ER TO DEFENDANTS’MOTION FOR
`RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`OF “PROCESSING MODULE”AND “PROGRAMMABLE INTERFACE”
`
`1
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`I,DR. RAY W . NETTLETON,state and declare as follows:
`1.
`Iam a testifying expert witness retained to provide expert opinions on
`
`behalf of the named Plaintiff M2M Solutions LLC (“M2M”)in the above-referenced
`
`actions. Isubmit this Declaration in support of M2M’s Answer To Defendants’Motion
`
`For Reconsideration Of The Court’s Claim Constructions Of “Processing Module”And
`
`“Programmable Interface”Based On The Federal Circuit En Banc Decision In
`
`Williamson V. CitrixOnline that was jointly filed by the named Defendants in the above-
`
`referenced actions on July 10,2015. Ihave personal knowledge of all of the facts stated
`
`herein and,if sworn as a witness,Icould and would testify competently thereto.
`MY BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS
`2. Iwas awarded a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University in
`
`1978,and a Master’s of Science in Electrical Engineering,also from Purdue University,
`
`in 1976.
`
`3. Ialso hold a Bachelor of Technology degree,magna cum laude,from the
`
`University of Dayton,which was awarded in 1974.
`
`4. My Ph.D. research focused on technology for wireless telecommunications.
`
`My doctoral thesis topic was entitled “Spectral Efficiency in Land‐Mobile
`
`Communications: A Spread Spectrum Approach.”It was a seminal work of relevance to
`
`the later adoption and use of CDMA technology in 3G wireless networks.
`
`5.
`
`The primary focus throughout my career has been wireless
`
`telecommunications networks,and devices and circuits for use in those networks.
`
`6.
`
`As an Associate Professor at the University of Colorado,Boulder,and in other
`
`institutions,Ihave taught graduate‐level courses in wireless local area networks,public
`
`networks,satellite,and other wireless communications technologies. Iremain on the
`
`adjunct faculty of the University of Colorado.
`
`7. Presently,Iam an independent telecommunications consultant with a
`
`specialty in wireless communications. Ihave been in the wireless telecommunications
`
`field for 35 years and have been a consultant for an aggregate of 16years.
`
`2
`
`2
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`8.
`
`A true and correct copy of my curriculum vitae is attached hereto as Exhibit 1,
`
`which includes all the publications Ihave authored in the previous 10 years,among
`
`others.
`
`APPLICABLE DEFINITION OF A POSITA
`
`9. Ihave been informed by M2M’s counsel that M2M has previously advanced
`
`the following definition of a person of ordinary skill in the art (hereinafter,a “POSITA”)
`
`relative to U.S. Patent No. 8,094,010 (the “‘010 patent”)asserted in these cases: “the
`
`level of ordinary skill in the art would be met by a person with a bachelor’s degree in
`
`computer science or electrical engineering with at least two years of software
`
`programming experience and at least two years of industry experience working with
`
`wireless communications networks and/or W ide Area Networks (“W ANs”).” Iagree
`
`with this definition and have applied it in formulating my opinions below relating to the
`
`“processing module”and “programmable interface”claim terms.
`
`DISCLOSURES OF ALGORITHMIC STRUCTURE
`EXPLAINING HOW THE “PROCESSING MODULE”
`PERFORMS ITS AUTHENTICATING FUNCTION
`As recited in the “processing module”limitation that appears in independent
`
`10.
`
`Claims 1 and 52of the ‘010 patent,the function of the “processing module”is
`
`authenticating a received incoming transmission. See (‘010 patent at 12:27-37;15:61-
`
`16:4). The surrounding claim language in the “processing module”limitation expressly
`
`explains how this authenticating function is to be performed. (Id.). Indeed,the claim
`
`language states that the particular manner by which the “processing module”can carry
`
`out authenticating is “by determining if the at least one transmission contains the coded
`number.” (Id.).1
`
`1 The specification for the ‘010 patent confirms that this is the particular manner in which
`the “processing module”is capable of performing its authenticating function. See,e.g.,
`(‘010 patent at Figs. 2& 3;4:35-40).
`
`3
`
`3
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`11. W hen the “by determining”claim language phrase quoted above is read in
`
`view of the more detailed and particularized teachings of the ‘010 patent specification,a
`
`POSITA would understand that it teaches that the “processing module”can perform its
`
`authenticating function by determining whether the received incoming transmission
`
`contains a required coded number through comparing a coded number stored locally in
`
`memory with the coded number from the transmission to verify whether they match. See
`
`(‘010 patent at 9:15-10:22). Indeed,the preferred embodiment of the claimed
`
`“programmable communicator”is described as comprising a SIM card which stores a
`
`PUK code in memory. (Id. at 9:24-34). As the specification explains,the “PUK code is
`
`a unique identifier”coded number “which is different for every SIM card.” (Id.). W hen
`
`incoming SMS message transmissions are received that include certain programming
`
`instructions,these transmissions will be authenticated if they are confirmed to contain a
`
`PUK code that matches the PUK code stored locally on the receiving “programmable
`
`communicator”device. (Id. at 9:15-10:22). To wit,the “programmable communicator
`
`includes a processing means to determine that the PUK code is correct”as contained in
`
`the received incoming SMS transmissions. (Id. at 9:41-42).
`
`12.
`
`Similarly,when this “by determining”claim language phrase is read in view
`
`of the prosecution history,a POSITA would likewise understand that it teaches that the
`
`“processing module”can perform its authenticating function by determining whether the
`
`received incoming transmission contains a required coded number through comparing a
`
`coded number stored locally in memory with the coded number from the transmission to
`
`verify whether they match. Since the very first claim set in the priority PCT application
`
`from 2001,the disclosed approach to “determine the authenticity”of an incoming
`
`transmission received from a programming transmitter has been by “comparing said
`
`coded number [from the transmission]with a [stored]preset number”to verify whether
`
`4
`
`4
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`they “coincide.” (Hensch. Decl. at Exh. 7,p. 3041).2 As later recited in the first claim
`set from the ‘010 application itself,the “processing module . . . authenticates[s]the at
`
`least one transmission by comparing the coded number with a preset number”to
`
`determine if it “matches.” (Hensch. Decl. at Exh. 8,p. 2029).
`
`13.
`
`A POSITA would understand the intrinsic record disclosures identified above
`
`which explain specifically how the “processing module”is capable of performing its
`
`recited authenticating function as comprising a simple three-step algorithm. A POSITA
`
`would appreciate the three steps of this authentication algorithm as being the following:
`
`(1)identifying a coded number contained in a received incoming transmission;(2)
`
`retrieving a coded number stored locally in memory on the receiving device;and (3)
`
`comparing the coded number from the transmission with the coded number retrieved
`
`from memory to determine whether they match. (Id.)
`
`14.
`
`Given the very simple and basic nature of the above algorithm and the state of
`
`the art that existed in the May 2000 time frame,any POSITA would have readily been
`
`able to write a software program for implementing such an algorithm for use in a wireless
`
`data module such as the claimed “programmable communicator”or elsewhere.
`
`USAGE OF THE TERM “PROGRAMMABLE
`INTERFACE”IN THE PRIOR ART TO DESIGNATE
`A W ELL-KNOW N CLASS OF PERIPHERAL INTERFACES
`As recited in the “programmable interface”limitation that appears in
`
`15.
`
`independent Clams 1 and 52of the ‘010 patent,the function of the “programmable
`
`interface”is to establish a communication link between the claimed “programmable
`
`communicator”and a monitored technical device. See (‘010 patent at 12:25-26;15:59-
`
`60). This function is confirmed in the specification where the “programmable
`
`2As used herein,the term “Hensch. Decl.”is a reference to the Declaration Of Marc N.
`Henschke In Support Of Defendants’Motion For Reconsideration Of The Court’s Claim
`Constructions Of “Processing Module”And “Programmable Interface,”filed
`concurrently herewith under separate cover.
`
`5
`
`5
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`is able to be configured by control signals sent by a microprocessor that cause designated
`
`parameter values to be written into its control registers. Indeed,its technical reference
`
`manual contains a chapter entitled “Programmer’s Model”that “describes the . . .
`
`[PL061]registers and provides details needed when programming the peripheral.” (Exh.
`
`9,p. 11357). This technical reference manual further indicates that the PL061 GPIO has
`
`“programmable input/output pins,”as well as “programmable interrupt capability”that is
`
`invoked through the “programming of the interrupt control registers.” (Id.,pp. 11339,
`
`11342,11348,11352).
`
`25.
`
`Accordingly,it is my opinion that in the May 2000 time frame,the term
`
`“programmable interface”as it is used in the ‘010 patent claims had a well-established
`
`structural meaning to POSITAs as a designation for that general class of peripheral
`
`interfaces known in the prior art that has been identified and described above.
`
`Ideclare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and
`
`that this Declaration is executed on this 3rd day of August,2015 at Laguna Hills,
`
`California.
`
`Ray W . Nettleton
`
`10
`
`6
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:ded
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`Other Documents
`1:12-cv-00030-RGA M2M
`Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless
`America Inc. et al
`
`MEDIATION-SRF,PATENT
`
`U.S. District Court
`
`District of Delaware
`
`Notice of Electronic Filing
`
`The following transaction was entered by Kirk, Richard on 8/3/2015 at 3:59 PM EDT and filed on
`8/3/2015
`Case Name:
`M2M Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless America Inc. et al
`Case Number:
`1:12-cv-00030-RGA
`Filer:
`M2M Solutions LLC
`Document Number:197
`
`Docket Text:
`[SEALED] DECLARATION re (195 in 1:12-cv-00030-RGA) Answering Brief in Opposition,
`(191 in 1:12-cv-00033-RGA) Answering Brief in Opposition,, (162 in 1:12-cv-00032-RGA)
`Answering Brief in Opposition,, /Declaration of Dr. RayW. Nettleton in Support of
`Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Claim
`Constructions of "Processing Module" and "Programmable Interface" by M2M Solutions
`LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5)
`Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Certificate of
`Service)(Kirk, Richard)
`
`Case Name:
`M2M Solutions LLC v. Enfora Inc. et al
`Case Number:
`1:12-cv-00032-RGA
`Filer:
`M2M Solutions LLC
`Document Number:164
`
`Docket Text:
`[SEALED] DECLARATION re (195 in 1:12-cv-00030-RGA) Answering Brief in Opposition,
`(191 in 1:12-cv-00033-RGA) Answering Brief in Opposition,, (162 in 1:12-cv-00032-RGA)
`Answering Brief in Opposition,, /Declaration of Dr. RayW. Nettleton in Support of
`Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Claim
`Constructions of "Processing Module" and "Programmable Interface" by M2M Solutions
`LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5)
`Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Certificate of
`Service)(Kirk, Richard)
`
`Case Name:
`Case Number:
`Filer:
`
`M2M Solutions LLC v. Motorola Solutions Inc. et al
`1:12-cv-00033-RGA
`M2M Solutions LLC
`
`https://ecf.ded.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?70804001606441
`
`8/3/2015
`
`7
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:ded
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`Document Number:193
`
`Docket Text:
`[SEALED] DECLARATION re (195 in 1:12-cv-00030-RGA) Answering Brief in Opposition,
`(191 in 1:12-cv-00033-RGA) Answering Brief in Opposition,, (162 in 1:12-cv-00032-RGA)
`Answering Brief in Opposition,, /Declaration of Dr. RayW. Nettleton in Support of
`Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Claim
`Constructions of "Processing Module" and "Programmable Interface" by M2M Solutions
`LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5)
`Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Certificate of
`Service)(Kirk, Richard)
`
`1:12-cv-00030-RGA Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`James S. Green
`
`jgreen@svglaw.com, spappa@svglaw.com
`
`Jason J. Keener
`
`jkeener@foley.com, DWillis@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey J. Mikrut
`
`jmikrut@foley.com, koliver@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey N. Costakos
`
`jcostakos@foley.com
`
`Jennifer Hayes
`
`jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com, sharrisjohn@nixonpeabody.com
`
`Jeremy A. Tigan
`
`jtigan@mnat.com
`
`Kadie Jelenchick
`
`kjelenchick@foley.com, smaass@foley.com
`
`Marc N. Henschke mhenschke@foley.com, ARezek@foley.com
`
`Matthew J. Shin mshin@foley.com
`
`rkirk@bayardlaw.com, jlately@bayardlaw.com, SBussiere@bayardlaw.com,
`Richard D. Kirk
`tmatthews@bayardlaw.com
`
`Ronald F Lopez
`
`rflopez@nixonpeabody.com
`
`sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com, jlately@bayardlaw.com,
`Stephen B. Brauerman
`SBussiere@bayardlaw.com, tmatthews@bayardlaw.com
`
`Thomas C. Grimm tcgefiling@mnat.com, tgrimm@mnat.com
`
`1:12-cv-00030-RGA Filer will deliver document by other means to:
`
`1:12-cv-00032-RGA Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Christopher E. Hanba
`
`christopher.hanba@klgates.com, gwen.amoroso@klgates.com
`
`Christopher W. Kennerly
`
`chriskennerly@paulhastings.com, jerrywebb@paulhastings.com
`
`https://ecf.ded.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?70804001606441
`
`8/3/2015
`
`8
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:ded
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`Elizabeth L. Brann
`
`elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com, karenobrien@paulhastings.com
`
`Eric C. Rusnak
`
`eric.rusnak@klgates.com, klgateseservice@klgates.com
`
`Ericka J. Schulz
`
`erickaschulz@paulhastings.com
`
`francis.digiovanni@dbr.com, christina.rasnick@dbr.com, Docket-WM-
`Francis DiGiovanni
`Lit@dbr.com, pam.nagle@dbr.com
`
`Jason J. Keener
`
`jkeener@foley.com, DWillis@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey D. Comeau
`
`jeffreycomeau@paulhastings.com
`
`Jeffrey J. Mikrut
`
`jmikrut@foley.com, koliver@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey N. Costakos
`
`jcostakos@foley.com
`
`Kadie Jelenchick
`
`kjelenchick@foley.com, smaass@foley.com
`
`Marc N. Henschke mhenschke@foley.com, ARezek@foley.com
`
`Matthew J. Shin mshin@foley.com
`
`rkirk@bayardlaw.com, jlately@bayardlaw.com, SBussiere@bayardlaw.com,
`Richard D. Kirk
`tmatthews@bayardlaw.com
`
`sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com, jlately@bayardlaw.com,
`Stephen B. Brauerman
`SBussiere@bayardlaw.com, tmatthews@bayardlaw.com
`
`1:12-cv-00032-RGA Filer will deliver document by other means to:
`
`Mikal Condon
`UNDELIVERABLE EMAIL 3/10/15
`
`1:12-cv-00033-RGA Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Clyde Shuman
`
`cshuman@pearlcohen.com, clydes@pczlaw.com
`
`David Loewenstein
`
`dloewenstein@pearlcohen.com, davidl@pczlaw.com
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld
`
`jbbefiling@mnat.com
`
`Jason J. Keener
`
`jkeener@foley.com, DWillis@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey J. Mikrut
`
`jmikrut@foley.com, koliver@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey N. Costakos
`
`jcostakos@foley.com
`
`Kadie Jelenchick
`
`kjelenchick@foley.com, smaass@foley.com
`
`https://ecf.ded.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?70804001606441
`
`8/3/2015
`
`9
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:ded
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`Keren Livneh
`
`klivneh@pearlcohen.com, areddy@pearlcohen.com
`
`Marc N. Henschke mhenschke@foley.com, ARezek@foley.com
`
`Matthew J. Shin mshin@foley.com
`
`rkirk@bayardlaw.com, jlately@bayardlaw.com, SBussiere@bayardlaw.com,
`Richard D. Kirk
`tmatthews@bayardlaw.com
`
`sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com, jlately@bayardlaw.com,
`Stephen B. Brauerman
`SBussiere@bayardlaw.com, tmatthews@bayardlaw.com
`
`1:12-cv-00033-RGA Filer will deliver document by other means to:
`
`The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
`
`Document description:Main Document
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733 196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-0]
`[9b2c2af4a097524d096ca01166c8ddede5c5fc51fd53a7df8651b0fd0bf7a44f05f1
`7774349f176101deca23c751ed7390152f21d4967108ab2b70225ec50692]]
`Document description:Exhibit 1
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-1]
`[54dcf72c522783f1f68a083300bf74edf658aeaae76c2934322e063cd4f21324582e
`9394bed9f5bb205d93634066a53f1c33111f75186313feea049048aad7d1]]
`Document description:Exhibit 2
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-2]
`[950fe79e4b2e9b0da7ccd0237bc7401b94fd204cb36dd803fd593577c4c5facab5d0
`db7b582088fd947512c267048ec38f02c7c3f506b1ba61fa6ea706579385]]
`Document description:Exhibit 3
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-3]
`[e18668d65791948d16d4cdec9a03a91bf3986cd4b4a6bb69280ec5d3c7ea23bf90a4
`b08e908448e519bab074b09ee5c891e82f843b2d885e064756b58d84d362]]
`Document description:Exhibit 4
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-4]
`[b83f690fd6915c5954dc0e6f6565ac38d7cd94e14a7e347b6995d138d50c34b78d77
`062a22c40e96728a94d1a61ea8477657a5e1addd96f078e75a3a490b9ce9]]
`Document description:Exhibit 5
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-5]
`[655c97e61c8bdd8e18e1c65f4ce74f0ffa8625c7cc6039cc8cc981791a36c9461f21
`
`https://ecf.ded.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?70804001606441
`
`8/3/2015
`
`10
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006
`
`

`
`CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:ded
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`ea9acbd0bf386bfc45382b9cd0a14e79a335681a3795780e782a5821e5f8]]
`Document description:Exhibit 6
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-6]
`[40f8eadeffb8b45dd6e6f412008719ab91acb290e0824d361eb7456aab4174f0a41e
`de950ca3c7d65526b430bbb533901edbdf922fde8732e62a920ed93c73e1]]
`Document description:Exhibit 7
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-7]
`[d4397a3a08dccdbd2523e3db0ebfa4de711236896cf8797f815bbb3a45661c12c708
`10d31fe3a41e0013babd4afcdb65ce8692089c1aabd6c651f71c92fb2228]]
`Document description:Exhibit 8
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-8]
`[dc2d137cc90eb50e856beedec8203f2556178b9457610f8ab9f23221c86da92c0ebe
`6294e06b238ad1e49deec643c1cce0677ac53da3af822f395a017f8a21eb]]
`Document description:Exhibit 9
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-9]
`[ae7cc5d6ef16a8d68b5bbddc4048ad8fefafa9a41625eae931f1fc4218d712a7b20e
`8331af0a96a83ad0ea1bcb98f22a90ab2c8b29437a23d5711834fa9a37a8]]
`Document description: Certificate of Service
`Original filename:n/a
`Electronic document Stamp:
`[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1079733196 [Date=8/3/2015] [FileNumber=2587962-10
`] [9cdf7f53672566aba51bffcb3e6df31c90cb023f440a583615fc6b02370a7470d5c
`7ad15c3a688a8877190c64d5f994252df9324eadf3e74eac0c69170cb7391]]
`
`https://ecf.ded.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?70804001606441
`
`8/3/2015
`
`11
`
`M2M
`Ex. 2006