throbber
J. Med. Chem. 1986,29, 849-852
`
`849
`
`Notes
`
`3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors. 4.' Side Chain
`Ester Derivatives of Mevinolin
`
`W. F. Hoffman,*+ A. W. Alberts,* P. S. Anderson,' J. S. Chen,* R. L. Smith,? and A. K. Willardt*$
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, and Rahway, New Jersey 07065.
`Received July I , 1985
`
`Modification of the 2(S)-methylbutyryl moiety of mevinolm led to a series of side chain ester derivatives. A systematic
`exploration of the structure-activity relationships showed that the introduction of an additional aliphatic group
`on the carbon cy to the carbonyl group increased potency. This observation led to the synthesis of compound 16,
`which has about 2.5 times the intrinsic inhibitory activity of mevinolin.
`
`Scheme I
`
`3
`
`The novel fungal metabolites compactin (ML-236B)2p3
`(la) and mevinolin (MK-803, monacolin K)415 (lb) are
`potent inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis at the level
`of the rate-limiting enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-
`coenzyme A reductase [HMG-CoA reductase; mevalo-
`nate:NADP+ oxidoreductase (CoA acylating), EC 1.1.1.34].6
`Mevinolinic acid (2) , the dihydroxy acid form of the lactone
`lb, is the most potent inhibitor (Ki = 0.6 nM)4 reported
`to date and is an effective hypocholesterolemic agent in
`several animal species and man.4,7 Since HMG-CoA re-
`ductase6 catalyses the rate-limiting step in cholesterogen-
`esis and hypercholesterolemia is a known primary risk
`factor8q9 for coronary heart disease (the major cause of
`death in Western countries), it was deemed important to
`delineate the structural features of mevinolin responsible
`for its HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity. In this
`paper, the first of a series describing studies on the
`structural modification of mevinolin, we describe the re-
`sults of modifying the 2(S)-methylbutyryl moiety, some
`of which led to side chain ester derivatives with enhanced
`potencies.
`
`UCH3
`
`512, R = (CH3),CH
`b, R = C&CHz
`C. R =(CH3CHz&C
`"4a (method A): (CH3)&HCOC1, 4-DMAP, pyridine, 20 "C, 18
`h. 4b (method B): PhCH2C02H, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, 4-
`pyrrolidinopyridine, CHzC12, 20 "C, 18 h. 4c (method C): (CH3C-
`H,),CCOCl, 4-pyrrolidinopyridine, pyridine, 100 "C, 12 h. *Three
`equivalents of Bu,N+F-.3H20, 4 equiv of HOAc, THF, 20 "C, 18 h.
`
`2
`
`of the hindered axial alcohol 3 with isobutyryl chloride in
`pyridine containing 4-(dimethy1amino)pyridine (DMAP)
`
`la, R = H
`b, RmCH3
`
`Chemistry. The compounds prepared for this study
`are listed in Table I. Their syntheses from the corre-
`sponding silyl ether 31° are shown in Scheme I. Acylation
`
`t West Point, PA.
`Rahway, NJ.
`5 Present address: Stuart Pharmaceuticals, Division of IC1
`Americas, Wilmington, DE 19897.
`(1) Part 3: Stokker, G. E.; Alberts, A. W.; Anderson, P. S.; Cragoe,
`E. J., Jr.; Deana, A. A.; Gilfillan, J. L.; Hirshfield, J.; Holtz, W.
`J.; Hoffman, W. F.; Huff, J. W.; Lee, T. J.; Novello, F. C.;
`Prugh, J. D.; Smith, R. L.; Willard, A. K. J. Med. Chem. 1986,
`29, 170.
`(2) Brown, A. G.; Smale, T. C.; King, T. J.; Hasenkamp, R.;
`Thompson, R. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1976, 1165.
`(3) Endo, A.; Kuroda, M.; Tsujita, Y. J. Antibiot. 1976, 29, 1346.
`
`(4) Alberts, A. W.; Chen, J.; Kuron, G.; Hunt, V.; Huff, J.; Hoff-
`man, C.; Rothrock, J.; Lopez, M.; Joshua, H.; Harris, E.;
`Patchett, A.; Monaghan, R.; Currie, S.; Stapley, E.; Albers-
`Schonberg, G.; Hensens, 0.; Hirshfield, J.; Hoogsteen, K.;
`Liesch, J.; Springer, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1980, 77,
`3957.
`(5) Endo, A. J. Antibiot. 1980, 33, 334.
`(6) Rodwell, V. W.; Nordstrom, J. L.; Mitschelen, J. J. Adu. Lipid
`Res. 1976, 14, 1.
`(7) (a) Tobert, J. A.; Hitzenberger, G.; Kukovetz, W. R.; Holmes,
`I. B.; Jones, K. H. Atherosclerosis 1982,41, 61. (b) Tobert, J.
`A.; Bell, G. D.; Birtwell, J.; James, I.; Kukovetz, W. R.; Pryor,
`J. S.; Buntinx, A.; Holmes, I. B.; Chao, Y.-S.; Bolognese, J. A.
`J. Clin. Znuest. 1982, 69, 913.
`(8) Kannel, W. B.; Castelli, W. P.; Gordon, T.; McNamara, P. M.
`Ann. Intern. Med. 1971, 74, 1.
`(9) Stamler J. Arch. Surg. 1978, 113, 21.
`
`0022-2623/86/1829-0849$01.50/0 0 1986 American Chemical Society
`
`Sawai USA, Inc., et al. v. Nissan
`
` Chemical Industries, Ltd.
`
` NCI Exhibit 2003
` Case IPR 2015-01647
`
`

`
`850 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 29, No. 5
`
`Notes
`
`Table I. Effects of Modification of the Side Chain Ester Moiety of Mevinolin Howo
`
`no.
`l b
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`5a
`10
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`14
`
`15
`16
`17
`5c
`18
`19
`
`20
`
`5b
`
`21
`
`R'
`
`recryst solvent
`
`mp, O C
`
`formula"
`
`methodb
`
`H CH,
`\.?
`CHi,CH2C
`
`n-C4H9C1
`ether/ hexane
`chromat CHzClz/acetone (4/1)
`chromat CH2C12/acetone (9/1)
`CH,CN/HZO
`ether
`prep HPLC Zorbax ODS
`CH3CN/H20 (45/55)
`prep HPLC Zorbax ODS
`CH,CN/H20 (45/55)
`chromat CH2C12/acetone (4/1)
`prep HPLC Altex C,
`
`153-156
`116-119
`semisolid
`semisolid
`144- 147
`119-123
`113-118
`
`116-119
`
`110-1 13
`126-128
`
`CH&N/HZO (45/55)
`n-C4H9C1
`n-C4H9C1/ hexane
`n-C4HgC1/ hexane
`CH,CN/H20
`ether/ hexane
`cyclohexane
`
`167.5-170.5 C24H3605
`135-138
`C25H3805
`111-113
`C26H4005
`129-132
`C27H4205
`81-83
`C28H4405
`155-158
`
`C30H4205'1
`
`/ 20C6H12
`
`chromat ether/CHzClz (1/1)
`
`119.5-120.5 CZ6H3,FO5
`
`CHBCN/H,O
`
`n-CdH9CI
`
`109-112
`
`C27H3405
`
`120-1 22
`
`C26H3206'1/4C4H9C1
`
`A
`B
`A
`B
`A
`A
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`A
`
`A
`Cf
`C
`C
`C
`A8
`
`A
`
`B
`
`A
`
`IC50,c
`nM
`2.2
`
`relative
`potencyd
`254
`
`269
`38.6
`8.7
`295
`7.7
`5.4
`27.3
`
`2.9
`
`3.5
`2.2
`
`2.7
`0.9
`1.4
`1.4
`1.9
`3.8
`
`37
`
`19
`
`83
`
`2.1
`14
`64
`1.9
`72
`103
`20
`
`187
`
`157
`254
`
`209
`622
`394
`391
`294
`147
`
`15
`
`29
`
`6.8
`
`'See Experimental
`"Analytical results are within *0.4% of the theoretical values. bSee Experimental Section for details of methods A-C.
`Section for protocol. dFor estimation of relative inhibitory potencies, compactin was assigned a value of 100 and the IC,, value of the test
`compound was compared with that of compactin determined simultaneously. 'C, H analysis was not obtained. The 360-,Hz NMR was in
`full agreement with the structure. IThe acylation was run at 100 "C for 4 h. gThe acylation was run at ambient temperature for 5 days.
`
`as a catalyst at ambient temperature for 18 h (method A)
`resulted in quantitative conversion to the ester 4a. An
`alternative acylation procedure (method B) is demon-
`strated by the preparation of the phenylacetic ester 4b via
`treatment of a CH2Cl2 solution of the alcohol 3 with
`phenylacetic acid and dicyclohexylcarbodiimide in the
`presence of 4-pyrrolidinopyridine. This procedure was also
`used for the preparation of 7, since the attempted synthesis
`of 7 by method A failed to provide any of the desired ester.
`However, method B could not be used to prepare the ad-
`amantyl derivative 19 as no acylation occurred after 3 days.
`The extremely hindered esters such as the diethylbutyric
`ester 4c could not be prepared by methods A or B but
`required more vigorous acylation conditions. Heating a
`pyridine solution of the alcohol 3 and the diethylbutyryl
`chloride at 100 OC for 12 h in the presence of DMAP or
`4-pyrrolidinopyridine as a catalyst provided the ester 4c
`(method C). In this instance, the overall yield was only
`40% because of byproducts resulting from the elimination
`of the 0-silyloxy ether at elevated temperatures.
`As noted previously,1° attempted deprotection of the silyl
`
`(10) Willard, A. K.; Smith, R. L. J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharrn.
`1982, 19, 337.
`
`ethers 4 with tetrabutylammonium fluoride in THF caused
`rapid and extensive destruction of the lactone ring.'l
`Attenuation of the offending basicity of fluoride by ad-
`dition of acetic acid permitted clean unmasking of the
`0-hydroxy lactones 5.
`Biological Results and Discussion
`The compounds listed in Table I were converted to their
`ring-opened sodium dihydroxy carboxylate salts and were
`evaluated for their ability to inhibit solubilized, purified
`rat liver HMG-CoA reductase. The elimination of
`branching in the side chain ester moiety of lb provided
`compounds 6-9, which had diminished inhibitory activities.
`The removal of the terminal methyl from the 2-methyl-
`butyryl moiety gave 5a, which was about one-third as
`
`(11) Treatment of mevinolin (lb) under the same reaction condi-
`tions (Le., 3 equiv of Bu4N+F-.3H20, THF, 20 "C) for 2 h
`followed by careful acidification (1 N HC1, slight excess) af-
`forded mevinolinic acid (2) exclusively. Hence, although both
`p-silyloxy lactones 4 and @-hydroxy lactone 1 are sensitive to
`the basicity of fluoride under typical Corey condition^,'^ their
`relative propensities toward 1,Z-diaxial elimination differ
`markedly.
`
`
`
` NCI Exhibit 2003
`
`

`
`Notes
`
`potent as lb. When the a-methyl group was moved further
`from the carbonyl group (i.e., to the @carbon (lo)), activity
`was diminished by 50%. The introduction of unsaturation
`into the isopentyl moiety of 10 to provide 11 lowered the
`intrinsic inhibitory activity. However, when the double
`bond was moved to the B and y carbons, activity was in-
`creased. Replacing the terminal methyl of 10 with a tri-
`fluoromethyl group 13 also increased the activity. Inter-
`estingly, stereochemistry at the carbon a to the carbonyl
`group is not critical as l b and its diastereomer 14 are
`equally potent. The introduction of an additional methyl
`group on the carbon a to the carbonyl group to give 16
`increased the potency about 2.5-fold. Increasing the length
`of the substituents on the CY carbon provided esters 17,5c,
`and 18, which were less potent than 16 but more potent
`than lb. Replacement of the bulky side chain of 16 with
`the more compact adamantyl moiety (19) ablated activity
`as did conversion to aromatic esters 20, 5b, and 21. No
`statistically significant correlation could be made between
`log PIz or volume13 and log (relative potency) for the 20
`side chain ester derivatives in Table I.
`Analysis of the intrinsic inhibitory activities of these
`compounds suggests the following: (a) the stereochemistry
`of the side chain ester moiety is not important for inhi-
`bitory binding to HMG-CoA reductase; (b) the spacial
`requirements of the acyl moiety are compatible with com-
`pact, branched-chain aliphatic acyl groups; and (c) addi-
`tional branching at the a carbon of the acyl moiety in-
`creases potency. Further modifications of the side chain
`ester moiety as well as other portions of the mevinolin
`structure along with in vivo testing results will be described
`in subsequent papers from these laboratories.
`Experimental Section
`Melting points were determined on a Thomas-Hoover capillary
`melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Proton NMR
`spectra were recorded in CDC13, unless noted otherwise, on either
`a Varian EM-390, XL-300, or NT-360 spectrometer. Chemical
`shifts are reported in parts per million relative to Me4Si as the
`internal standard. Elemental analysis for carbon, hydrogen, and
`nitrogen were determined with a Perkin-Elmer Model 240 ele-
`mental analyzer and are within &0.4% of theory unless noted
`otherwise. Optical rotations were determined with a Perkin-Elmer
`Model 141 polarimeter. All starting materials were commercially
`available unless indicated otherwise.
`[1S-[ la,3a,7@,8@(2S *,4S *)8a@]]-8-[2-[4-[[(1,l-Dimethyl-
`et hyl)dimethylsilyl]oxy]tetrahydro-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-y1]-
`ethyl] - 1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydr0-3,7-dimet hyl- 1 -napht halen yl
`2-Methylpropionate (4a) (Method A). Isobutyl chloride (0.49
`g, 4.6 mmol) was added over 2 min to a stirred solution of the
`alcohol 3'' (0.5 g, 1.15 mmol) and DMAP (50 mg) in dry pyridine
`(5 mL) at 0 "C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture
`was stirred at 0 OC for 1 h and then at ambient temperature for
`18 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with ether (100 mL) and
`washed with 2% aqueous HCl(3 X 25 mL), saturated NaHC03
`solution (25 mL), and brine (2 X 25 mL). After drying (MgS04)
`and filtration, the solution was evaporated to give crude 4a as
`a viscous yellow oil. The oil was chromatographed on a silica gel
`(230-400 mesh) column. Elution with CHzC12-acetone (32.3:1,
`v/v, 200 mL) provided a forerun, which was discarded. Continued
`elution with the same eluant (200 mL) gave the ester 4a (0.58 g)
`as a pale yellow oil. NMR 6 0.09 (6 H, s), 0.88 (9 H, s), 1.13 (6
`H, d, J = 6 Hz), 4.32 (H, m), 4.63 (H, m), 5.34 (H, m), 5.54 (H,
`m), 5.78 (H, dd, J = 6, 10 Hz), 6.03 (H, d, J = 10 Hz).
`[IS-[ la,3a,7@,8@(2S *,45*),8a@]]-1,2,3,7,8,8a-Hexahydro-
`3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-( tetrahydro-4- hydroxy-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-
`yl)ethyl]-l-naphthalenyl2-Methylpropionate (5a). A solution
`of 4a (0.58 g, 1.15 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added to a mag-
`netically stirred solution of acetic acid (0.341 g, 4.8 mmol) and
`
`(12) Smith, G. M., in house program.
`(13) Pomona Medchem Project, Pomona College, Claremont, CA.
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 29, No. 5 851
`
`Bu4N+F-.3H20 (1.13 g, 3.6 mmol) in THF (10 mL), and the
`reaction was stirred 18 h at ambient temperature. The reaction
`mixture was diluted with ether (100 mL) and washed successively
`with 2% aqueous HC1, HzO (25 mL), and brine (2 X 25 mL). After
`drying (MgS04) and filtration, the solution was evaporated to
`provide 5a as a pale yellow solid. The solid was chromatographed
`on a silica gel (230-400 mesh) column. Elution with CHzClZ-
`acetone (4:1, v/v, 300 mL) provided a forerun, which was dis-
`carded. continued elution with the same eluant (280 mL) gave
`the ester 5a. Recrystallization of the solid provided an analytical
`sample as colorless needles. NMR 6 0.88 (3 H, d, J = 7 Hz), 1.08
`(3 H, d, J = 7 Hz), 1.13 (6 H, d, J = 6 Hz), 2.67 (2 H, m), 4.30
`(H, m), 4.55 (H, m), 5.30 (H, m), 5.50 (H, m), 5.70 (H, dd, J =
`6, 10 Hz), 5.95 (H, d, J = 10 Hz).
`[IS-[ la,3a,7@,8@(2S *,4S *),8a@]]-8-[2-[4-[ [ (1,l-Dimethyl-
`ethyl)dimethylsilyl]oxy]tetrahydro-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-yl]-
`ethyl]-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-l-naphthalenyl
`Benzeneacetate (4b) (Method B). A solution of the alcohol
`3 (434 mg, 1.0 mmol), benzeneacetic acid (204 mg, 1.5 mmol) and
`N,"-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
`(309 mg, 1.5 mmol) in CHzClz (10
`mL) was treated with 4-pyrrolidinopyridine (22 mg, 0.15 mmol)
`and stirred at ambient temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere.
`After 3 days the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue
`was suspended in ether (25 mL) and filtered. Evaporation of the
`filtrate provided a viscous oil, which was chromatographed on
`silica gel (230-400 mesh). Elution with ether-hexane (l:l, v/v,
`60 mL) gave a forerun, which was discarded. Continued elution
`with the same eluant (60 mL) provided the ester 4b as a colorless,
`viscous oil (460 mg, 83%). NMR 6 0.10 (6 H, s), 0.90 (9 H, s),
`3.58 (2 H, s), 4.23 (H, m), 4.43 (H, m), 5.34 (H, m), 5.57 (€3, m),
`5.77 (H, dd, J = 6, 10 Hz), 6.03 (H, d, J = 10 Hz), 7.30 ( 5 H, br
`9).
`[ 15 -[ la,3a,7,!?,8,!?( 2 5 *,45 *),Sa@]]-l,2,3,7,8,8a-Hexahydro-
`3,7-dimethyl-8-[ 2- (tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2 H-pyran-2-
`yl)ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl Benzeneacetate (5b). This product
`was prepared analogously to 5a, starting with 4b (460 mg, 0.83
`mmol) and purified by chromatography and recrystallization.
`NMR 6 0.83 (3 H, d, J = 7 Hz), 1.04 (3 H, d, J = 7 Hz), 3.58 (2
`H, s), 4.10-4.60 (2 H, br m), 5.36 (H, m), 5.57 (H, m), 5.78 (H,
`dd, J = 6, 10 Hz), 6.03 (H, d, J = 10 Hz), 7.33 (5 H, br s).
`[ 1 s - [ la,3a,7@,8@( 2 5 *,4S *),Sa,!?]]-S-[ 2-[ 4-[ [ ( 1,l-Dimethyl-
`ethyl)dimethylsilyl]oxy]tetrahydro-6-oxo-2H -pyran-Z-yl]-
`ethyl]-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-l-naphthalenyl
`2,2-Diethylbutanoate (4c) (Method C). 2,2-Diethylbutyryl
`chloride (18.8 g, 115 mmol) was added to a magnetically stirred
`solution of the alcohol 3 (12.5 g, 28.7 mmol) and 4-pyrrolidino-
`pyridine (0.425 g, 2.87 mmol) in dry pyridine (100 mL), heated
`at 100 O C . The solution was stirred under a Nz atmosphere for
`12 h, cooled to ambient temperature, and added to ether (300 mL).
`The ethereal mixture was washed with 3 N HC1 (3 X 100 mL)
`and brine (4 X 100 mL) and dried (MgS04). After filtration and
`evaporation the crude product was chromatographed on a column
`of silica gel (70-230 mesh, 1 kg). Elution with ether-hexane (l:l,
`v/v, 3500 mL) provided a forerun, which was discarded. Con-
`tinued elution with the same eluant gave the ester 4c as a yellow
`oil (6.5 g, 40%). NMR 6 0.08 (6 H, s), 0.90 (9 H, s), 2.59 (2 H,
`d, J = 4 Hz), 4.32 (H, m), 4.63 (H, m), 5.52 (2 H, m), 5.80 (H, dd,
`J = 6, 10 Hz), 6.07 (H, d, J = 10 Hz).
`[IS-[ la,3a,7@,8@(2S *,4S *),8a@]]-1,2,3,7,8,8a-Hexahydro-
`3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-( tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-
`yl)ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl 2,2-Diethylbutyrate (5c). This
`compound was prepared analogously to 5a, starting with 4c (6.4
`g, 11.5 mmol) and purified by chromatography and recrystalli-
`zation. NMR 6 0.76 (9 H, t, J = 7 Hz), 0.83 (3 H, d, J = 7 Hz),
`1.09 (3 H, d, J = 7 Hz), 4.38 (H, m), 4.61 (H, m), 5.49 (2 €3, m),
`5.79 (H, dd, J = 10, 7 Hz), 6.00 (H, d, J = 10 Hz).
`2,2-Diethylpentanoic acid (22) was prepared by the general
`method of Pfeffer et al.15 n-Propyl bromide (5.4 g, 0.044 mol) was
`rapidly added at 0 OC to the dianion of 2-ethylbutanoic acid (5.1
`g, 0.044 mol) prepared in THF solution, and the reaction was
`stirred for 3 h at ambient temperature. Neutralization of the
`
`(14) Corey, E. J.; Venkateswarlu, A. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1972, 94,
`6190.
`(15) Pfeffer, P. E.; Silbert, L. S.; Chirinko, J. M., Jr. J. Org. Chem.
`1972, 37, 451.
`
`
`
` NCI Exhibit 2003
`
`

`
`852
`
`J . Med. Chem. 1986,29, 852-855
`
`reaction by the addition of 10% HCl (100 mL) at 0 "C gave a
`mixture, which was extracted into petroleum ether (2 X 250 mL).
`The organic extracts were combined, washed with saturated brine
`(4 x 50 mL), dried (MgSO,), and evaporated to provide a liquid
`('7.4 g), which was distilled to give 22; bp 133-134 "C (20 mm)
`(5.2 g, 75%). NMR 6 0.70-1.00 (9 H, m), 1.03-1.37 (2 H, m),
`1.40-1.77 (6 H, m).
`The following acid chlorides were prepared by heating the acid
`and 2 equiv of thionyl chloride at 100 "C for 2 h and purified by
`distillation.
`2,2-Dimethylbutyryl chloride: bp 130-134 "C; yield 76%;
`NMR 6 0.83 (3 H, t, J = 7 Hz), 1.20 (6 H, s), 1.60 (2 H, q, J =
`5 Hz).
`2-Ethyl-2-methylbutyryl chloride: bp 155-158 "C; yield
`61%; NMR 6 0.90 (6 H, t, J = 7 Hz), 1.20 (3 H, s), 1.43-1.97 (4
`H, m).
`2,2-Diethylbutyryl chloride: bp 65-66 "C (20 mm); yield
`90%; NMR 6 0.83 (9 H, t, J = 7 Hz), 1.70 (6 H, t, J = 7 Hz).
`2,2-Diethylpentanoyl chloride: bp 80-81 "C (20 mm); yield
`92%; NMR 0.73-1.00 (9 H, m), 1.10-1.43 (2 H, m), 1.53-1.87 (6
`H, m).
`
`Isolation of HMG-CoA reductase was carried out as pre-
`viously described.16
`HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibition Assay. IC,, values were
`determined with use of five levels of each inhibitor in the assay
`slightly modified from that previously described!
`In the revised
`protocol, enzyme was incubated for 5 min with inhibitor and
`NADPH prior to initiating the reaction with [14C]HMG-CoA (12.5
`wM, 5.9 pCi/pmol). IC,, values were calculated from percent
`inhibitions.
`Acknowledgment. We are indebted to Drs. R. F.
`Hirschmann and E. H. Cordes for their encouragement
`throughout the course of this investigation, to Dr. W. C.
`Randall and staff for analytical support, to Dr. D. W.
`Cochran for NMR spectra, and to M. Z. Banker for man-
`uscript preparation.
`
`(16) Stokker, G. E.; Hoffman, W. F.; Alberts, A. W.; Cragoe, E. J.,
`Jr.; Deana, A. A.; Gilfillan, J. L.; Huff, J. W.; Novello, F. C.;
`Prugh, J. D.; Smith, R. L.; Willard, A. K. J. Med. Chem. 1985,
`28, 347.
`
`3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors. 5. 6-(Fluoren-9-y1)-
`and 6-(Fluoren-9-ylidenyl)-3,5-dihydroxyhexanoic Acids and Their Lactone
`Derivatives
`
`G. E. Stokker,*+ A. W. Alberts,l J. L. Gilfillan,t J. W. Huff,$ and R. L. Smitht
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, and Rahway, New Jersey 07065.
`Received July 26, 1985
`
`A limited study was conducted to determine the biological consequences of rendering the phenyl rings of the previously
`reported' 7-(3,5-disubstituted [ l,l'-biphenyl]-2-yl)-3,5-dihydroxy-6-heptenoic acids coplanar. Such constraint
`substantially diminished intrinsic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity.
`
`c%
`
`H
`
`O
`
`u
`
`o
`
`
`
`n;y\
`
`eY
`
`vc,
`
`ey
`
`v
`
`0
`0 0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`C"3
`
`In a previous paper' on HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors,
`we reported the syntheses and biological properties of a
`series of 7-(3,5disubstituted [ l,l'-biphenyl]-2-yl)-3,5-di-
`hydroxy-6-heptenoic (and heptanoic) acids and their 6-
`lactones. In this paper, we describe the syntheses and
`biological consequences of rendering the two phenyl groups
`of the 1,l'-biphenyl fragment coplanar. The rationale for
`such a study is the observation that the intrinsic HMG-
`
`fluor- of greater than that is slightly of unsubstituted CoA enylidene reductase inhibitory 1 (from part 112 potency
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unsubstituted biphenyl 2 (from part 2).3 From those
`substituted biphenyl compounds in part 3 of this series,l
`compounds 3-5 were chosen for determining the effects
`of these constraints. The inherent difficulty in elaborating
`the dichlorofluorenylidene compound corresponding to
`biphenyl 3 compelled us to prepare the analogous dimethyl
`
`CI
`
`3
`
`CH3
`4
`
`* Merck Sharp & Dohme, Rahway, NJ.
`Merck Sharp & Dohme, West Point, PA.
`(1) Stokker, G. E.; Alberts, A. W.; Anderson, P. S.; Cragoe, E. J.
`Jr.; Deana, A. A.; Gilfillan, J. L.; Hirshfield, J.; Holtz, W. J.;
`Hoffman, W. F.; Huff, J. W.; Lee, T. J.; Novello, F. C.; Prugh,
`J. D.; Rooney, C. S.; Smith, R. L.; Willard, A. K. J. Med. Chem.
`1986, 29, 170.
`(2) Stokker, G. E.; Hoffman, W. F.; Alberts, A. W.; Cragoe, E. J.,
`Jr.; Deana, A. A.; Gilfillan, J. L.; Huff, J. W.; Novello, F. C.;
`Prugh, J. D.; Smith, R. L.; Willard, A. K. J. Med. Chem. 1985,
`28, 347.
`compound (8). We showed previ~usly'~~ that analogous
`
`(3) Hoffman, W. F.; Alberts, A. W.; Cragoe, E. J., Jr.; Deana, A.
`methyl-for-chlorine replacement on the central phenyl ring
`A.; Evans, B. E.; Gilfillan, J. L.; Gould, N. P.; Huff, J. W.;
`produces little, if any, lowering of intrinsic inhibitory po-
`Novello, F. C.; Prueh. J. D.: Rittle. K. E.: Smith. R. L.: Stokker.
`tency.
`G. E.; Willard, A.-K. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 159.
`0022-2623/86/1829-0852$01.50/0 0 1986 American Chemical Society
`
`CI
`
`5
`
`
`
` NCI Exhibit 2003

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket