throbber
HMC-COA Reductase Inhibitors, i.
`
`i/ournai 0/ Medieinat Chemistry, i990, Vol, 33, No. 2 63
`
`Table 1. Inhibition of Solubiiued Rat LWar HMC-CoA Reducuue in Vitro4 for Compounds of the Genera] Structure 1,' 2,' and 13*
`HO V^COjR'
`O?' rH
`
`i
`
`H\
`
`s*
`A
`
`no.
`
`la
`lb
`2b
`13b
`ic
`2c
`Id
`2d
`le
`2e
`l i t
`If
`
`Rl
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`Na
`
`Rl
`CH3
`j-Pr
`i-Pr
`i-Pr
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`i-Pr
`i-Pr
`j'-Pr
`i-Pr
`
`R*
`Ph
`Ph
`Ph
`Ph
`Ph
`Ph
`i.Pr
`i»Pr
`i'Pr
`i-Pr
`t'-Pr
`
`R4
`H
`H
`H
`H
`CH,
`CH,
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`2f
`
`Na
`
`Na
`Na
`Na
`
`i-Pr
`
`i-Pr
`i-Pr
`i-Pr
`
`Ph
`Ph
`Ph
`
`H
`
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`
`Q H
`0
`
`& R*
`1
`RJ
`I' a * . and 1 3 *
`R4
`A-B
`p-C,H«F CH-CH
`p-C«H4F
`CH-CH
`P-C1H4F
`CHtCHt
`p-C|H«F
`CHjCH,
`P'C(H«F CH-CH
`CHJCHJ
`p-C,H4F
`p«CtH«F CH-CH
`P'CfHjF
`CHjCH?
`p.C,H4F CH-CH
`p-C|H«F
`CHjCH}
`p-CtH.F
`CH?CHa
`p.C,H4F CH-CH
`
`formula
`CuHsFN04Na
`C.HT,FN04N»
`CHH9FNO«Na
`C^HJIFNO^NI
`CuHuFNO^a
`C»HnFNO,Na
`C^HoFNO^Na
`C,|HtTFN04Na
`CoH»FN0,Nt
`CsHsiFNO^Na
`CaK»FNO«Na
`CNHuFNO«Na
`
`anal.'
`C, H, N
`C, H, N
`C, H.N
`C, H.N
`C.H.N
`C, H, N
`C.H.N
`C. H.N
`C,H.N
`C. H.N
`C. H.N
`C. H. N
`
`IC^ nM
`65
`7
`6
`3
`2SQ
`70
`330
`100
`in
`IS
`9
`69
`
`reH pot..
`12
`no
`128
`25?
`3
`11
`2
`9
`6
`42
`8S
`12
`
`p-C,H4F
`
`CHJCHJ
`
`Ca,HuFNO«Na
`
`C. H.N
`
`9
`
`P'C4H«F
`p-C,H«F
`p-CtH<F
`
`CH—CH
`CH,CH}
`CHjCHt
`
`C.H.N
`C.H.N
`C, H, N
`
`92
`m
`6
`CT|H«FNO«Na
`i e
`149
`CnH»FN04Na
`S
`28
`24
`13K
`300
`CflHs>FNO«Na
`8
`100
`C^HyO.Na
`mevinolin
`•The aisay sy«tm dtsctibed in ref \ waau»ed. *Rin;>opened »odium dihydroxy carboxylate form,optically pure. 'Racemic. 'Optically
`active
`configuration. 'Analytical results were within *0.4% of the theoretical value. 'ICw values were determiaed by uaing four or
`(ivc concentraiions of each inhibitor. ' For estimation of relative inhibitory potencies, mevinolin was assigned a value of 100. The IC* value
`of lest compound was compared with that of mevinolin, corrected for the somewhat different molecular weight.
`
`*
`
`1
`
`1
`
`]
`
`Scheme V
`
`B'A-AK, —
`19
`
`I
`H
`
`22
`
`Ph
`
`R*
`
`-i-
`
`Scheme VI*
`
`O O
`R4
`I
`AJL
`RsCH=CNO? • R*
`OEl —~
`
`15
`
`19
`
`o
`•N*Ph
`H
`R*
`
`-S±- 4
`
`* |
`
`s
`
`[
`
`|
`
`HN^R*"
`I
`R'
`
`23
`
`R^^N'
`I
`R®
`24
`/(a) PhNHt/AcOH; (b) R3NH,/AcOH/-H,0; (c) 15/^; (d)
`KaH/CHjI/toluene/^; (e) LiAlH4/A; (O CrOj/pyridine-
`
`I
`

`
`4
`
`> r .
`
`functionality much faster than the keto group of 19. In
`this case, it was necessary to preform the anilides 22
`(Scheme V). Addition of aliphatic or aromatic primary
`amines R*NHj to 22 under add catalysis gave 23, which
`were cyclocondensed with nitroethenes 15 to give 3'
`Pyrroiecarbanilides 24. While amides on LAH reduction
`usually lead to the corresponding amines, carbasilides 24
`could be reduced to the corresponding aldehydes 4 via
`N'inethylation, LAH treatment, and subsequent oxidation.
`A new three-component coupling reaction allowed a
`one-pot synthesis of ethyl lt2-diisopropyI-4-(4-fluoro-
`Phsny]).lH-pyrrole-3-carboxylate (21. Scheme VI).
`When a methanolic solution of /S-nitro-p-fluorostyrene
`<15: R« = H. R5 = p-C6H,F>, jj-keto ester 19 (R* = i-Pr).
`isopropylaniine was stirred at ambient temperature,
`t"* pyrrole ester 21 was obtained in 50% yield. LAH
`'eduction followed by ruthenium(II)-catalyzed oxidation
`
`-
`
`RisC OiB t
`
`b.e
`
`R»
`
`R>
`21: R* » R* »i'Pt.
`R* * H,
`*•-0-'
`'(a) R3NHj/CHjOH/25 *0/1 day; (b) UA1H<; (c) 4 equiv of
`<Q "*** /0.02 equiv of (Ph^),RuCl,.
`
`of the alcohol with N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide11 gave
`the corresponding aldehyde 4. Tliis convenient three-
`component coupling may also be applicable for the
`syntheses of pyrrole esters 21 with other substitution
`patterns for R^-R*.
`Biological Results and Discussion
`The racemic sodium salts (1 asd 2, Rl * Na) as well as
`the optically active sodium salts 13 (R1«.Na) were eval­
`uated for their ability to inhibit solubilized, partially pu­
`rified rat liver HMG-CoA reductase in vitro (Table 1) and •
`
`(11) Sharpless, K. B.; Akashi, Oshima. K. Tttrahedron Lttt.
`1976,29.2503.
`
`426
`
`Sawai Ex 1005
`Page 2389 of 4322
`
`

`
`Jendrclta et a I.
`
`Table III. Inhioiiion of Hepatic Cholesterol "De Novo"
`Sv-nihesis in Vivo {Rat. Ora!ly),
`HO
`V^COjR'
`
`TH
`
`R\
`
`A
`
`R*
`
`I
`RJ
`
`relative
`potency
`
`J and 2
`% cholesterol
`"de novo* synthesis
`100
`no drug
`100
`14
`mevinolin*
`235
`5.5
`lbc
`250
`5.6
`2b(
`2f
`9
`156
`2r
`233
`6.0
`'Lactone form, optically pure, 5
`'Assay described in ref 16.
`mg/kg bw. 'Raeemic sodium salts, 10 mg/kg bw. For definition of
`R'-R4 and A-B see Table I.
`
`For better comparison of structure-activity relationships
`in I and 2 as well as with extensive work on analogues of
`the phenolic type (isocydic central aromatic, A = oxygen,
`B « CHj),14,15 R5 was kept constant as p-fluorophenyl. -
`The work on analogues of the phenolic type14,15 has
`shown that alkyl substitution of the second ortho position
`is essential and leads to optimal biological activity for an
`isopropyl substituent.
`We concentrated on R2 = methyl or isopropyl, since
`ortho substituents smaller (methyl, ethyl, longer n-alkyl)
`or larger (cydopentyl, feri-butyl) than the isopropyl group
`decreased activity in analogues of the phenolic type14,1* and
`since halogen substituents (CI, Br) led to good activity but
`increased toxicity.
`Table 1 shows that the isopropyl derivatives were more
`potent than the methyl derivatives by a factor of 10-40
`(e.g. lb vs la, Ig vs 1c, 2g vs 2c).
`There is much tolerance concerning R3. Variation of R3
`(Ph, i-Pr, cyclohexyl) led to only small activity changes (e.g.
`2b vs 2e vs 2f, lb vs le vs If, la vs Id).
`Substitution of R4 = hydrogen for a methyl group either
`slightly decreased (e.g. la vs le) or slightly increased (2b
`vs 2g and lb vs lg) activity, depending on the nature of
`the other substituents. Hydrogenation of the trans olefmic
`bridge (A-B * (£)-HC—CH) had little influence on the
`biological activity of 1 in vitro (e.g. lb vs 2b, 1c vs 2c; Id
`vs 2d, le vs 2e, If vs 2f, lg vs 2g); however, the hydro*
`genated derivatives 2 were much less acid sensitive (vide
`supra) and much more active in vivo.
`.
`;
`In the HEP G2 cell-test (Table II) the racemic com­
`pounds lb, 2b, and 2e are 3.5, 5.0, and 25 times, respec­
`tively, more active than optically pure mevinolin sodium
`salt of the same concentration. General trends in Tables
`I and II are comparable. The superiority of lb, 2b, and
`
`(14) Baader, E.; Bartmann, W.; Beck, G.; Bergmann. A.; Granxer
`E.: Jendralla, H.; von Kerekjarto, B.; Kesseier, K.: Krause, R
`Wess, G. International Symposium on Cholesterol Control And
`Cardiovascular Diseases: Prevention And Therapy, Mila»
`(Italy) July 7-9,1987; Abstract book page 133.
`'
`(15) European Application 0216 127,1987.
`(16) Dieuchy, J. M.; Spady, D. K. J. Lipid Res. 1984 , 25, 1469-
`Alfln-Slater, R. B.; Deuel. H. J., Jr.; Scholtz, M. C.; Shimodfc
`F. K. Group Report Nc. N3, 1950; University of Southero
`California. Consolidated Eng. Corp.
`
`427
`
`64 Journal of Medicinal Chemistn,', 1990, Vol. 33, No. 1
`
`Table II. Inhibition of Cellular JiMG-CoA Reductase in
`Cultures of HEP G2 Cells* for Sodium Salts of the General
`Formula 1( and 2'
`
`'
`
`HO
`Y^COJR'
`L^OI
`A X-
`
`fH
`s*
`
`R»
`
`R\
`
`R*
`
`I
`R'
`leand 2e
`relative* potency
`ICw* fiM
`mevinolin*
`0.05
`100
`0.83
`la
`6
`350
`lb
`0.014
`>500
`<0.01
`2b
`1
`5.0
`1c
`9
`0.57
`2c
`1
`Id
`6.0
`19
`0.27
`2d
`100
`0.05
`le
`2500
`2e
`0.002
`47
`If
`0.106
`275
`2f
`0.018
`'Ring-opened sodium
`•Assay described in the preceding paper.1
`dihydroxy carboxylate form, optically pure. 'Racemic. For defi­
`nition of R'-R* and A-B see Table 1. ' ICu values varied some­
`what for different batches of eel)*. Mevinolin sodium salt averaged
`ICJO a 5 x 10"* M and was used in every run as an internal stand­
`ard. The measured IC's for test compounds 1 and 2 were corrected
`for deviations of mevinolin'a IC from its average value. 'Mevinolin
`was assigned a value of 100. Potencies were obtained by compari­
`son of racemic test compounds 1 or 2 with the internal standard
`mevinolin.
`
`to inhibit cellular HMG-CoA reductase in cultures of
`hepatic cells (HEP G2, a human hepatoma cell line), as
`determined by the inhibition of the incorporation of so­
`dium [14C]aeetate into cholesterol (Table 12).
`Selected compounds were evaluated for their ability to
`inhibit hepatic cholesterol "de novo" synthesis in male rats
`after po administration, as determined by the inhibition
`of the incorporation of sodium (14C]octanoate12 into hepatic
`cholesterol (Table III).
`Selected compounds were further evaluated for their
`ability to decrease plasma cholesterol levels in normoli-
`pemic rabbits and dogs after po administration.
`All tests were also conducted under the same experi­
`mental conditions with optically pure mevinolin. The
`respective results are included in Tables MIL For sub­
`stitution patterns "b", "e", and "g", we prepared and tested
`the racemic 2 as well as the optically active 3ft, 5ft sodium
`salt 13. Optically active compounds 13 proved to have
`twice the potency in HMG-CoA reductase inhibition than
`the structurally identical but racemic 2 (Table 1). This
`result was expected, since the antipode of the configuration
`drawn for 1,2, and 13, is biologically inactive.13
`
`(12) Dieuchy, J. M.; McGarry, J. D. J. Biol. Chtm. 1974,249, 52.
`Andersen. J. M.; Dieuchy, J. M. J. Lipid Ret. 1979,20,740.
`Stenge, E. F.; Dieuchy, J. M. J. Lipid Rta. 1983,24,72.
`(13) 3-epi, 5-epi, and "3,5-bis epi isomers of compactin and mevi­
`nolin have been reported to be biologically inactive: Heathy
`cock, C. H.; Hadley, C. R.; Rosen. T.; Theisen, P. D.; Hecker,
`S. J. J. Med. Chem. 1987,30,1858. Stokker, G. E.; Rooney,
`C. S.; Wiggins, J. M.; Hirshfield. J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1986,51,
`4931. The biological inactivity of synthetic compactin ana­
`logues with 3S configuration has also been reported: Lee, T.-J.
`Trends Phormaeoi. Set. 1987, 8. 442 and references cited
`therein.
`
`• -
`
`Sawai Ex 1005
`Page 2390 of 4322
`
`

`
`HMG'COA Reductase Inhibitors. 2^.
`
`Journal of M f '' :iol Chemistry, 1990, VoL 33, No. I 65'
`
`especially 2e compared with mevinw.Ji is more pronounced
`in the cell test, inhibition of hepatic cholesterol "de novo"
`synthesis in vivo by oral lb or 2b is about 2.5 times
`stronger than that for mevinolin (Table UI). In normally
`fed rabbits (n = 6), 20 mg/kg racemic 2b decreased total
`plasma cholesterol levels by 34% after oral administration
`' for 10 days (optically pure mevinolin at 10 mg/kg for 10
`days* 25%), wile lb was totally inactive under the same
`conditions. The reason for the lack of activity of lb in the
`rabbit experiment is currently not known.32 The chemi­
`cally demonstrated add sensitivity of lb (vide supra) would
`suggest that, contrary to 2b, lb may not survive the
`_ | stomach passage. However this view is not consistent with
`B
`the comparable activity of lb and 2b to inhibit hepatic
`_ I;
`cholesterol Nde novo" synthesis in rats after po adminis-
`[
`tration (Table III). In normally fed rabbits (n = 4), 10
`mg/kg racemic 2e decreased total plasma cholesterol levels
`by 42% after oral administration for 6 days (optically pure
`I
`| mevinolin at 10 mg/kg for 6 days, 25%).17'1B
`••
`In normally fed male beagle dogs (n = 4), 20 mg/kg
`2
`racemic 2b decreased LDL-cholesterol levels by 48% and
`- P
`J* \
`increased HDL-cholesterol levels by 14% after oral ad-
`^ ministration for 14 days (optically pure mevinolin at 10
`u mg/kg for 19 days: LDL>cholesterol -18%, HDL-chole-
`pS \
`sterol +2%).18
`In conclusion, some compounds of general formula 2
`,ni 1
`exceeded mevinolin in their ability to inhibit HMG-CoA
`reductase in vitro and to inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis
`yj' i
`^ \
`in vivo. They are promising candidates for development
`as antiarterosclerotic agents.
`on :
`an
`Experimental Section
`For general remarks see the preceding paper in this issue.1 lH
`ice 5
`NMR spectre were recorded in CDClj, unless noted otherwise.
`yl) 1
`All starting materials were commercially available unless indicated
`>up R
`otherwise.
`ind f
`l-(p*Fluorophenyl)>2«n>tropropeDe (15). A solution of
`p-fluorobenzaldehyde (84 g), nitroethene (69.4 g), and n-butyl-
`sut 1
`amine (4 mL) in xylol (110 mL) was tefluxed for 20 h under a
`i
`ore g Dean-Stark trap. On cooling to 0 *C. 21.7 g of the product
`-40 li
`crystaUized (mp 64-^5 eC). To the filtrate were added nitroethene
`-•
`(41.4 g) and n.butylamine (3 mL). and the solution was refluxed
`• oi (
`for 14 h under a Dean-Stark trap. The solution was evaporated
`| in vacuo and the residue was digerated with methanol at 0 "C,
`e-8' {
`until crystallization occurred. The crystals were collected and
`Q washed with cold methanol (53.8 g, mp 65-66 *C). Anal. (Cj-
`•her| HJFNOJ) C. H. F, N.
`(2b
`Ethyl 3-(Phenylamino)«but'2(£)-enoate (20). A solution
`;
`eof
`aniline(45J>mL,0.5mol),ethylacetoacetate(615mUO^mol),
`Inic •
`8nd glacial acetic acid (1 mL) in toluene (100 mL) was refluxed
`the
`for 4 h under a Dean-Stark trap. The solvent was evaporated
`- id I
`an^ ^ residue was distilled to give 57.9 g of colorless oil: bp
`S \ (C„H15NO})C.H.N.
`j *
`t H8-120 -C (1.5 mm); MS CuHMNO< m/e « 205 (M*). Anal.
`
`x
`
`- - L I
`
`N.^V.Bis(3-(4*fluorophenyl)-4-(methoxycarbonyl)-5-
`. 5
`n)ethyl-2^.dihydrofuran-2-yl]hydroxylamine (17). To a
`•
`on* | stirred solution of sodium methanolate (2.92 g, 54 mmol) in
`pCC* [ methanol (54 ml) was added methyl acetoacetate (20.9 g. 180
`iu0 [
`"tmol) dropwise at 0 *C followed by 4-Auorfr-d-nitrostyrene19 (30.1
`blci | K. 180 mmol). After 15 min, a thick mash formed that was allowed
`an<) | toWand for 2 h at 0*C. The sdid was collected hy suction, washed
`with keloid methanol and dried over P^Om in vacuo to give 22.0
`C of colorless solid: mp 139-141 "C; 7.0 g of product were obtained
`from the mother liquor; NMR i 2.25 (6 H. s). 3.32 (3 H, s). 3.50
`<3 H. s). 4.30 (2 H. dd). 5.40 t7H. d). 7.16 (8 H. d), 8.72 (1 H. s);
`
`inttf'
`•.e. £•
`l A f f
`MiWi
`
`146»
`mod1,
`.the14
`
`Hypocholeaterolemic activity in rabbiu was tested following
`the protocol described in ref 1.
`.
`U8) Hypocholeaterolemic activity in animal studies will be de-
`scribed in detail in a future publication.
`(1°) Qatiernann.Wieland Die Praxis det Organischeri Chemikers,
`43rd ed.; W. de Gruyter. Berlin, 1982; P 361.
`
`MS CscHaFjNOt FAB m/e - 502 (M + H*), 458. 235. Anal.
`(CMHSSFjNO?) C, H. F, N.
`l«Phenyl»2*met)iyl*3»(iDethoxycarbonyl)-4-(4'fluoro.
`phenyl)-l£r.pyrrole (18a). Aniline (5^9 g, 60 mmol) was added
`to a solution of hydroxy lam tno compound 17 (15 g, 30 mmol) in
`ethanol (600 mL). The mixture was refluxed for 24 h. Aniline
`(1.1 g) was added and the mixture was refluxed for 16 h. The
`solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was distributed
`between dichloromethane and 1N hydrochloric add. The organic
`layer was washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and
`then with brine, dried, and concentrated. Tbe residue was
`chromatographed with n-hexane/ether/dichloromethane
`(16&.5&5) over silica, giving 4.0 g of reddish, thick oil: NMR
`S 2.43 (3 H, s), 3.70 (3 H, s), 6.70 (i H, s), 6J7~7.66 (9 H. m); MS
`CuHuFNO, m/e « 309 (M+), 276,248. Anal (QJHJ^FNOJ) C.
`H. F. N.
`Msopropyl-2-niethyI-3-(n!ethoxycarbonylM*(4*fluoro»
`phenylH-ff-pyrrole (18d). Isopropylamine (3.6 g, 60 mmol)
`was added to a suspension of hydroxylamino compound 17 (15
`g. 30 mmol) in methanol (500 mL). 'Hie suspension was heated
`for 2 h at 40 CC and for 5 h at SO 0C, changing to a clear solution.
`The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was chro­
`matographed with n-hexane/ether (4:1) over silica to yield 7.3
`g of pale reddish crystals: mp 97-99 0C; NMR & 1.42 (6 H, d),
`2.53 (3 H. s). 3.65 (3 H. s). 4.37 (1H. sept). 6.60 (1H, s), 6.80-7.46
`(4 H. m); MS C,8H„FNO, m/e = 275 (M+), 244,202,201. Anal
`(C.jHJBFNO,) C. H.F, N.
`Ethyl l-Phenyl*2.5-dimcthy].4*(4'fluoropheDyl)*lJY-
`pyrrole^.carboxylate (21c). A solution of 20 (23.1 g, 113 mmol)
`and 15 (20.5 g, 113 mmol) in ethanol (250 mL) was refluxed for
`30 h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was
`chromatographed over silica (1 kg) with cydohexane/ethyl acetate
`(95:5) to give 26.0 of a colorless oil: NMR 6 1.05 (3 H. t), 1.85
`(3 H. s). 13 {3 H. s). 4.1 (2 H, q), 6.9-7.6 (9 H, m); MS C,, H»FNOj
`m/e = 337 <M+). 308, 292. Anal. (CjtHjoFNOj) C, H. F, N.
`Preparation of Substituted liTPyrrole&carboxaldehydes
`4 from Substituted 3-(AlkoxycarboDyl)*l/f•pyrroles 18 or
`21. General Procedure. A solution of ester 18 or 21 (82 mmol)
`in ether (150 mL) was added dropwise at 0-5 *C to the stirred
`suspension of lithium aluminum hydride (7.8 g, 200 mmol) in ether
`(300 mL). The suspension was stirred for 1 h at 0 *C and then
`for 2 h at room temperature. At 0 *C. 35 mL of ethyl acetate and
`then 16 mL of water followed by 24 mL of 2 N aqueous sodium
`hydroxide were added dropwise. The suspension was stirred for
`30 min at room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was con­
`centrated in vacuo and the residue was chromatographed over
`1 kg of silica with cydohexane/ethyl acetate (2:1) containing 0.2%
`triethylamine (yield 85-95%).
`To a solution of the substituted 3-(hydroxyinethyl)pyrrole (70
`mmol) in ether (1.2 L) and triethylamine (12 mL) was added
`activated manganese dioxide (1823 g). The suspension was stirred
`at room temperature under nitrogen. After 24 h, the same amount
`of manganese dioxide was added. After 24 h the soUd was removed
`and washed with ether. The filtrates were concentrated in vacuo;
`the residue was chromatographed over silica with cyctohexane/
`ethyl acetate (6:1) containing 0.1% triethylamine (yield 65-85%).
`l-Phenyl.2,5>dimethyl.3*(hydroxymethyl).4~(4-fluoro.
`phenylM/f-pyrrole: colorless oil. crystallizing on standing;
`NMR J 1.3 (1 H. br s). 2.0 (3 H, s). 2.1 (3 H. s), 4.55 (2 H. s).
`6.9-7.65 (9 H. m); MS C„H,$FNO m/e « 295 (M*), 278 (M* -
`OH). Anal (CwH,eFN0) C, H, F, N.
`l'Phenyl>2>methyl.3-(bydroxyniethyl).4-(4>fluoro.
`phenylM/f-pyrroJe: pale yellow, resinous solid: NMR & 13 (1
`H, br s), 126 (3 H. s). 4.63 (2 H. s), 6.87 (1H, s). 6.93r7.70 (9 H.
`m); MS CuH,6FN0 m/e = 281 (M+). 264 (M" - OH). Anal.
`• (CwHwFNO) C, H. F, N.
`l-Isopropyl-2'methyl-3-(hydroxyraetbyl)-4-(fIuorO'
`phenylWtf-pyrrole: colorless oil; MS C^HuFNO m/e «= 247
`(M* - OH). 188. Anal. (C,sH,8FNO) C, H, F, N.
`l-Phenyl*2*methyl'4'(4.fluoropheny])*lff-pyrrole-3«
`carboxaldehyde (4a): yellow, resinous solid; NMR 6150 (3 H,
`s). 6.80 (1H, s), 6.85-7.70 (9 H. m). 10.03 (1 H, a); MS CUHMFNO
`m/e - 279 (M*), 278 (M* - H). Anal. (CwHwFNO) C. H, F, N.
`l*Pheayl*2,5'dimethyl*4-(4-nuorophenyl)*lif'pyrrole«3*
`carboxaldehyde (4c): yellow solid; NMR 6 1.94 (3 H, a), 2.35
`(3 H, J), 6.95-7.7 (9 H, m), 9.85 (1 H. s); MS CwHj.FNO m/e =
`
`428
`
`Sawai Ex 1005
`Page 2391 of 4322
`
`

`
`66 Journoi
`
`of Medicinal C^pmistry, 1990. Vo/. 33, No. I
`
`.
`293 {M+). Anal. (C19H1SFNU C. H, F, N.
`l-Isopropyl-2-mcthyl-4-(4-nuoropheDyl)-lH-pyrrole-3-
`carboxaldehyde <4d): colorless oil; NMR S 1.43 (6 H. d), 2.60
`(3 H. s), 4.30 (1 H. sept). 6.68 (1 H, s). 6.9-7.56 (4 H. m). 9.92 (1
`H, s); MS C19H|(FNO m/e a 245 (M*), 202. Anal. (C,5Hl6FN0)
`C, H, F, N,
`3*Oxo>4*methylpeDtanoic Acid Aoilide (22). A solution of
`ethyl 3>ox>4»methyipenLanoate9 (47.4 g. 0.3 mol), aniline (27.93
`g, 27.3 mL, 0.3 mol), and acetic acid (0.6 mL) in toluene (360 mL)
`was refluxed for 4 h with a Dean-Stark trap. The cold mixture
`was washed twice with 0.5 N hydrochloric acid, twice with satu­
`rated sodium bicarbonate solution, once with brine, dried, con­
`centrated, and chromatographed with toluene/ethyl acetate (10:1)
`over 1 kg of silica, giving 40.5 g (66% yield) of a pale pink oil:
`NMR S 1.2 (6 H. d), 2.6 (1 H. sept), 3.65 (2 H. s), 7.0-7.75 (5 H.
`m), 9.1-9.4 (1H, br s); MS C^HJJNOJ m/e « 205 (M+). 93. Anal.
`(CJIHUNO,) C. H, F, N.
`3'(Phenylamino)<4-mothylpent*2(£)-«noic Acid Anilide
`(23b). A solution of ethyl 3-oxo^-methylpentanoate9 (31 mL,
`0.2 mol), aniline (37 mL, 0.41 mol), and acetic acid (1.0 mL) in
`toluene (50 mL) was refluxed for 6 h with a Dean-Stark trap. The
`solvent was removed in vacuo. On cooling the residue crvstallized.
`It was recrystailized from toluene/petroleum ether (80-110 aC)
`(2:1) to yield 38.7 g of colorless solid: mp 147-148 *C; a second
`crop of crystals can be obtained from the mother Hquor, NMR
`6 1.1 (7 H, d + m), 2.9 (I H. sept), 4.75 (1 H. s), 6.8-7.6 (10 H,
`m). 11.1 (1 H. br s). Anal. {CiaHwN,0) C, H. N.
`3-(IsopropylajD!oo)'4>mcthy)pent>2(£)-«noic Acid Anilide
`(23e). To a solution of anilide 22 (35.7 g, 174 mmol) and acetic
`acid (0.6 mmol) in toluene (GOO ml), refluxing under a Dean-Stark
`trap, was added isopropylamine (20.6 g, 348 mmol) dropwise over
`3 h. The mixture was refluxed for 16 h, concentrated in vacuo,
`and cooled, leading to crystallization. The solid was digerated
`with diisopropyi ether/petroleum ether (1:1), collected with suction
`nitration, and washed with petroleum ether, giving 28.9 g of
`colorless solid: mp 152-153 *C; NMR a 1.1 (6 H, d). 1.25 (6 H,
`d), 2.73 (1 H, sept). 3.8 (t H. m), 4.43 (1 H, s), 6.7 (1 H, s). 6.9-7.6
`(5 H. m), 9.1-9.6 (1 H. br s); MS CJJHMNJO CI m/e = 247 (M
`+ m. 154. Anal. (CjjHnNjO) C. H. N.
`3-(Cyclohcxylaimno)-4-mcthyipeDt-2(£)-«noie Acid Ani>
`Jide (230. A solution of anilide 22 (31.6 g, 154 mmol). acetic acid
`(1.5 mL), and cyclohexylamine (30.55 g, 308 mmol) in toluene (750
`mL) was refluxed for 20 h under a Dean-Stark trap. The solvent
`was removed in vacuo, the residue was swirled with 150 mL of
`diisopropyi ether, collected with suction filtration, and washed
`with petroleum ether to give 27.1 g of a colorless solid (an addition
`8.9 g came from the mother liquor): yield 82%: mp 123-132 CC;
`NMR a 1.15 (6 H. d). 1.0-2.1 (10 H. ro). 2.7 (1 H. sept). 3.45 (I
`H. m), 4.4 (I H. s). 6.55 (I H. m), 6.9-7.6 (5 H, m). 9.5 (1 H, br
`s) MS C,8HMN]0 m/e » 286 (M*), 194,93. Anal. (C,8HJ,N.O)
`C, H. N.
`*
`"
`Preparation of Substituted l.ff-Pyrrole-3'CarboxanUides
`24 from Enamino Anilidcs 23. General Procedure. A solution
`of the nitro olefin 15 (95 mmol) and enamino carboxanilide 23
`(100 mmol) in ethanol (300 mL) was refluxed for 12 h under
`nitrogen. Most of the solvent was removed in vacuo. Cooling
`of the residue in an ice bath gave crystals that were swirled in
`cyclohexane/ethyl acetate (200 mL), collected, and recrystailized.
`l-Phenyi*2-isopropyl-4-(4-nuorophenyl)-lif-pyrrole-3*
`carboxanilide (24b): yield 78%; mp 192-194 0C (from meth­
`anol); NMR a 1 JO (6 H. d), 3.14 (1H, sept), 6.73 (I H, s), 7.00-7.70
`(10 H, ro). Anal. (CMHJJFNJO) C, H, F, N.
`l^-Djisopropyl-4-(4-fluoropheDyl)-li?'pyrrole-3-carbox-
`anilide (24e): yield 50%; mp 131-133 ®C (not recrytt); NMR
`6 1.45 (6 H. d), 1.35 (6 H. d). 3.75 (1 H. sept). 4.6 (1 H. sept), 6.7
`(1H. s), 6.7-7.6 (10 H. m); MS CaHjjFNjO m/e = 364 (M*), 272,
`230. Anal. (CjjHyFNjO) C, H, F, N.
`l-Cyclohexyl-2-is6propyl*4-(4>nuoropheDylMJ7>pyrrole-
`3-carboxanilide (24f): yield 52%; mp 215-216 eC (not recrvst);
`NMR a 0.9-2.2 (16 H. d + m), 3.5-4.3 (2 H, m). 6.65 (1 H. s),
`6.8-7.6 (10 H,'m) MS CMH»FNjO CI m/e « 405 (M + H"). 312,
`230. Anal. (C„HnFNjO) C, H, F, N.
`!-Phenyl-2-isopropyM-(4-fluoropheDyl)-5-inethyMi/-
`pyrrole-3-carboxanilide (24K)'.
`80%; mp 190-192 0C (from
`cyclohexane/ethyl acetate); NMR a 1.3 (6 H, d), 1.83 (3 H. s). 3.2
`(1 H. sept), 6.8-7.6 (15 H, m); MS C^HaFNiO m/e = 412 (M*).
`
`Jendrolla et e
`
`320 (M* - PhNH). Anal. (C^F^O) C. H. F, N.
`Preparation of Substituted lH-Pyrn>Ie-3-carboxaldehydc
`4 from Substituted I/f-Pyrrole-3-carboxanilides 24. Gencn
`Procedure, (a) N-Methylation. To a mechanically stirre
`solution of anilide 24 (55 mmol) in toluene (300 mL) was adde
`a 50% dispersion of NaH in mineral oil (5.5 g, 115 mmol) at 2
`0C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The suspension was warme
`for 30 min at 60 0C and for 10 min at 100 0C. The suspensio
`was cooled to 20 eC and methyl iodide (62.5 g, 440 mmol) we
`added. It was refluxed (bath at 75 eC) for 4-16 h, depending o-
`steric hindrance (TLC control). With external cooling with dr
`ice/methanol, first water (80 mL) was added dropwise, follow*
`by ether (400 mL). The organic phase was separated, washed wit*
`brine, dried, and concentrated in vacuo. The residues ofte:
`crystallized when swirled with n-hexane or diisopropyi ether t
`a colorless to pale yellow solid. Oily products were purified b'
`chromatography with cyclohexane/ethyl acetate/ triethylamin
`(8:2:0.01) over silica.
`l>Phenyl>2>isopropyl-4>(4>fIuorophenyl)-N>methy]-lA>
`pyrrolC'S-carboxaoiiide: yield 94%; mp 126-127 °C (not re
`cryst); MS CAHJJFNJO m/e = 412 (M*), 306,262. Anal. (Cr
`HJJFNjO) C.'H, F, N.
`lt2-Dii$opropyl-4-(4-fiuorophenyl)-^-methyl-li/
`pyrrole-3-carboxanilidc: yield 737o; oil; NMR S 1.40 (12 H, d)
`3.23 (4 H, s + sept), 4.40 (1 H. sept). 6.50 (1H, s), 6.5-7.5 (9 H
`m); MS Cj.H^FN^O m/e = 378 (M*), 272,91. Anal. (C„HnF
`NjO) C, H, F, N. *
`l-Cyclohexyl-2*isopropyl-4-(4-nuorophenyl)*A,-mcthyI
`l/f-pyrrole-S-carboxanilidc: visld 98%; mp 102-105 aC (no:
`recryst): NMR i 1.35 (3 H. d), 1.50 (3 H, d), 1.1-2.2 (11 H, m) ..
`3.25 (3 H, br s) 3.95 (1 H, m), 6.4-7.4 (10 H, m); MS CjrH^FN.C
`CI m/e = 419 (M + H+), 312. Anal. (Cn^FN,©) C, H, F, N
`l-Pheny]-2-isopropyi-4-(4.riuarophenyI)-5>mcthyI-W-
`mcthyMf/-pyrrolc-3-carboxanilidc: yield 84%; mp 62-63 "C
`{not recryst); NMR a 1.2 (3 H. d). 1.3 (3 H. d), 1.8 (3 H, s), 2.E
`(1 H. sept). 3.17 (3 H, s), 6.fr-7.5 (14 H. m); MS CnHnFNjO m/e
`- 426 (M*), 320 (M* - PhNCHj). Anal. (CJJHTTFNJO) C, H, F.
`N.
`(b) Reduction. To a suspension of lithium aluminum hydride
`(60 mmol) in dry THF (120 mL) under nitrogen was added
`dropwise a solution of N-methylaniUdes (29 mmol) in THF (120
`mL). The mixture was refluxed for 20 h and then cooled to 0 "C.
`Ethyl acetate (15 mL) and then water (5 mL) followed by 2 N
`sodium hydroxide solution (10 mL) were added dropwise. The
`mixture was stirred for 30 min at 25 aC. The solids were removed
`and washed with ether.
`The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The residues often
`crystallized when swirled with n-pentane.. Oily products were
`purified by chromatography with toluene/ethyl acetate/tri-
`ethylamine (20:1:0.01) over silica.
`l-Phenyl-2-isopropyl-3-(hydroxymethylM-(4-fIuoro-
`phenyJHJJ.pyrroie: yield 92%; oil; NMR 6 1.28 (7 H. d + m),
`3.03 (1 H. sept), 4.70 (2 H. s), 6.73 (1 H. s), 6.90-7.70 (9 H, m);
`MS CWHRFNO m/e - 309 (M*), 294,276. Anal. (CRHJOFNQ)
`C.H.F.N.
`l^-Diisopropyl-3-(hydroxyniethyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-
`lif-pyrrole: yield 75%; pale yellow oil that slowly crystallized;
`NMR 6 1.2-1.6 (12 H, m), 2.35 (1 H, br s), 3.33 (1 H, sept), 4.40
`(2 H, s), 4.50 (1 H. sept), 6.70 (1 H, s), 6.8-7.65 (4 H, m); MS
`C,THBFNO CI m/e = 275 (M*), 258,242,200. Anal. (CL7HAFN0)
`C.H.F.N.
`l*Cyclohexyl*2-isopropyl-3-(hydroxymethyl)-4.{4*nuoro-
`phenyl)-ltf-pyrrole: yield 67%; mp 114-116 'C (not recryst);
`NMR 41.37 (6 H, d), 1.2-2.1 (10 H, ro). 3.30 (1 H. sept), 3.96 (1
`H. ro). 4.38 (2 H, s). 6.70 (1 H. s), 6.95 (2 H, m), 7.47 (2 H, m);
`MS CMHMFNO m/e « 315 (M+), 300, 282, 200. Anal. (C»-
`HMFNO) C, H, F, N.
`l-Phenyl-2-isopropyl-3-(hydroxymethyl)-4*(4Tfluoro-
`phenyl)-5-njethyl-lH-pyrrole: yield 63%; colorless solid; NMR
`5 1.25 (6 H. d), 1.9 (3 H, s), 2.8 (1 H, m), 4.35 (1 H, s), 4.55 (2 H, •
`s), 6.85-7.75 (9 H, m); MS C-jH^FNO m/e = 323 (M+), 308 (M*
`- CHj), 290 (M* - CHj - H;0). Anal. (Cj.HnFNO) C.H, F. N.
`(c) Oxidation. Variant A. To a mechanically stirred sus­
`pension of Celite (50 g) and finely powdered CrOj (25 g, 250 mmol)
`in dry dichloromethane (250 mL) at 15 0C was added dropwise
`a solution of dry pyridine (39.5 g, 500 mmol) in CHjClj (250 mL).
`
`429
`
`Sawai Ex 1005
`Page 2392 of 4322
`
`

`
`<
`
`•
`•
`
`After stirring Bt room temperature (20 min), a solution of the
`substituted (hydroxymethyOpyrrole (25 mmol) in CH3C13 (250
`(ot) was added dropwise but quickly. The reaction temperature
`^ept between 20 and 24 0C. After 15 min cyclohexane (500
`was
`» mL) was added. The solid was suction filtered and washed with
`^ dichloromethane/cyclohexane (3.7)
`filtrate was concentrated
`ajid chromatoKTaphed with cydohexane/ethyl acetata/triethyl-
`amine (4:1:0.01) over 500 g of silica.
`Variant B." To a solution of N-methyimorphoiine N-oxide
`(46.8 g, 400 mmol) in acetone (400 mL, dried over K3C03) was
`added tris(triphenylphosphine)rutheDium(ID dichloride (3.8 g,
`4.0 mmol). The mixture was stirred 20 min at 20 "C. A solution
`of the substituted (hydroxymethyDpyrrole (100 mmol) in dry
`sceume (600 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred
`for 10-20 h at room temperature. After complete reaction' (TLC,
`cydohexane/ethyl acetate/triethylamine 4:1:0.1), the mixture was
`filtered through a short, thick siiica pad. The pad was washed
`with ether (3 L); the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The
`residue, pure 4, usually crystallized, when digerated with n-pentane
`at 0 BC.
`i.pheoyl*2'isopropyl-4-(4-nuorophenyl)-lH-pyrrole-3-
`' ;
`s carboxaldehyde (4b): yield (variant A) 35%, (variant B) 87%;
`| pele yellow solid: mp 119-120 0C; NMR 6 1.36 (6 H, d), 3.16 (1
`I H, sept), 6.65 (1 H, s), 7.0-7.7 (9 H, m), 10.1 (1 H, s); MS C„-
`5 H.JFNOm/e = 307(M*),292. Anal. (CJOHUFNOC.H.F.N.
`U.Dil80propyl-4-(4-nuoropheDyl)-lH'pyrrole-3-carbox-
`1
`• aldehyde (4e): yield (variant B) 877o; yellow oil; NMR i 1.43
`' " (6 K, d), 1.47 (6 H, d). 3.80 (1 H. sept). 4.57 (1 H, sept). 6.62 (1
`1 i H.s)I7.06(2H,m).7.37{2H,m).9.89(lH,s);MSC,7HJoFNO
`•
`\ m/e - 273 (M*), 258, 244. Anal. (CpHjoFNO) C. H, F, N.
`| l-Cyclohexyl-2-isopropyM-(4.fluorophenyl)-lH-pyrrole-
`t 3*carboxaldehyde (4f): yield (variant B) 98%; colorless crystals;
`' '
`t mp 134-135 #C; NMR i 1.45 (6 H,d), 1.1-2.2 (10 H.m), 3.55-4.35
`^
`' I (2H.m + sept),6.65(IH.s).6.9-7.6(4 H.m),9.95(lH,s);MS
`\ CHHMFNO m/e- 313 (M*), 298,231,216. Anal. (CJOHJ^FNO)
`3
`E P C.H.F.N.
`l-PbeDyl«2«isopropyM*(4*nuorophenyl)-5-raethyl-ltf*
`B pyrrole-3-carboxaldehyde (4g): yield (variant A) 45%; pale
`] | yellqnv solid; NMR i 1.3 (6 H. d),2.1 (3H.s).3.1 (1H. sept). 6.9-7.6
`! e (9H.m).10.0(lH.s);MSC„HwFNOin/«*321(Ma Ana).
`? } (CnHjoFNO) C. H. F, N.
`I
`Synthesis of 1.2-Dit3opropyl-4-(4-nuorophenyl)-lff•
`e [ pyrrole-3-carboxaldehyde (4e) via Three>CompoDent Cou-
`• piing Reaction According to Scheme VI. (a) Three-Corn-
`4
`• pooent Coupling. Ethyl l^!-Diisopropyl-4-(4-nuoro-
`n i phenyl)'lH-pyrroie-3-carboxylate (21e). To a suspension of
`£ 4«nuoro-d>niirostyrene1' (209 g. 1.25 mol) in absolute methanol
`j. I (500 mL) was added ethyl S-oxo^-methylpentanoaU9 (214 g. US
`j mol) under ice cooling followed by isopropyUmine (128 mL. 1^0
`- [ mol). both in one portion. Absolute methanol (1L) was added.
`. [ the ice bath was removed, and the reaction mixture was stirred
`were
`7. s
`'or 48 h in a tightly stoppered flask. Volatile components
`'' ** removed in vacuo. The brown, viscous oil was filtered with
`toluene/0.1% triethylamine through 5 kg of silica ge! (70-200 fim)
`•g to give 197 g (49.7% yield) of a yellow solid: mp 72-74 *C; NMR
`'I g (CDjCl,) 6 1.07 (3 H. t), 1.36 (6 H. d), 1.42 (6 H. d). 3.73 (1 H.
`10 1
`4-06 (2 H. q), 4.50 (1 H. sept). 6.60 (1 H. a). 6.80-7.40 (4
`«. m); MS (DC!, posit, isobutane) CnH^FNOj m/e = 318 (M
`IS
`+ «•). 317t 302. Anal. (C^H^FNOj) C. H. F, N.
`0)
`. — _ (b) Reduction. l^-Diisopropyl-3-(hydroxyiDethyl)-4-(4-
`B "uorophenyD-lH-pyxroIe. A solution of the ethyl ester (197
`H t' 0£2 mol) in ether (750 mL) was added dropwise at 0 "C to a
`(1 6 ^Ptuion of lithium aluminum hydride (47.2 g, 1.24 mol) in ether
`• (1.5 L). The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0 0C and for
`.ik
`m * h ®t 20 "C. At ChlO 'C ethyl acetate (150 mL) was added
`oropwise, and then water (38 mlj followed by 2 N sodium hy-
`•0* R f x^e solution (75 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred
`R
`15 min at room temperature. The inorganic solids were re­
`moved by suction filtration and washed thoroughly with ether.
`H.
`H Triethylamine (1 mL) was added to the combined filtrate and
`N- B "^'"gs.and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give a yellow
`JS; B ^ (131 g. 77%. yield) that had spectra identical with those of
`thc authentic material described above.
`10I)
`•-fee •
`Oxidation was performed as described above to give 4e
`y. B ** a yellow solid in 92% yield.
`
`i
`
`z
`
`fiMC'CoA Reductase Inhibitors. 2
`
`Journal of Medici
`
`Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, No. I 67
`
`Pyrrole-Substituted Acryionitriles 5. General Procedure.
`At 0 eC a solution of diisopropyl (eyanomethyDphosphonate (13.5
`g, 66.0 mmol) in dry THF (200 mL) was added dropwise to a
`suspension of sodium hydride (3,78 g of a 50% dispersion in
`mineral oil. 78.7 maol) in dry THF. (700 mL). After 40 min at
`0 0C, a solution of aldehyde 4 (44,0 mmol) in THF (100 mL) was
`added d

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket