throbber
kwi~
`
`026 454 675
`
`llll Ill Ill II Ill II llll I llll I II
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
`
`Test Advantage, Inc., an Arizona
`corporation,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`Eric Paul Tabor and Ronni Tabor, husband
`and wife; and Rizon Software, L.L.C., an
`Arizona corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`No.: CV2005-03392-EHC
`
`ORDER RE: CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, it is ordered that that the below-
`
`15
`16 identified terms of the Tabor Patent shall be construed as follows:
`
`17
`
`1. The term "tester'~ shall mean equipment used to test semiconductors,
`
`18
`including but not limited to automatic test equipment (A TE) available from such
`19 suppliers as Teradyne.
`20
`
`2. The term "outlier" shall mean a test result that is within the upper and lower
`
`21
`22 limits of the product's specifications (i.e., a test result that does not indicate a "bad" or
`23 "out of spec" part) but nevertheless strays from values which are statistically similar.
`
`24
`
`3. The terms "identify an outlier", "identify outliers", and "identifying an
`
`25
`
`outlier" shall be interpreted to establish the identity of an outlier that is retained in the
`26 data for later use (including but not limited to being included in an output report) ~'l""f"'.ll"'IPl~""""'""lll
`27
`rather than being removed or screened from a set of data.
`
`28
`
`ase 2:05-cv-03392-EHC Document 93
`
`Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
`Linear Tech. Corp. v. In-Depth Te t LLC
`Page 1
`
`

`
`1
`4. The term "supplemental data analysis" as used in Claims 8-14 shall mean
`2 any appropriate automated analysis of the test data to achieve any suitable objective -
`3
`i.e., any computerized or automated analysis of the test data beyond that provided by
`4 the tester itself in generating the test data.
`5
`
`5. The term "section group of components on a wafer" in Claims 3, 10, and 17
`6
`7 shall mean that the test data of the wafer to be analyzed is separated into separate
`8 sections or groups of components and that the test data of each section or group is
`then analyzed separately.
`
`9
`
`10
`
`6. The term "at run time" in Claims 6, 13, and 15-20 shall mean within a
`
`11 matter of seconds or minutes following the generation of the test data.
`12
`
`It is further ordered vacating the Markman Hearing currently scheduled for
`
`13
`14 March 29, 2007.
`
`DATED this 16th day of February, 2007.
`
`Earl H. Carroll
`United States District Judge
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`22
`
`23
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`ase 2:05-cv-03392-EHC Document 93
`
`2
`
`Filed 02/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
`
`LineCilr Tech. Corp. v. In-Depth Test LLC, Page 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket