throbber
Useful Proteins
`
`from Recombinant Bacteria
`
`Bacteria into which nonbacteria] genes ba ve been introduced are
`
`able to manufacrure nonbacterial proteins. Among the proteins
`
`made by recombinant-DNA methods are insulin and interferon
`
`by Walter Gilbert and Lydia Villa-Komaroff
`
`living cell is a protein factory. It
`synthesizes the enzymes and oth—
`er proteins that maintain its oWn
`integrity and physiological processes,
`and (in multicelled organisms) it often
`synthesizes and secretes other proteins
`that perform some specialized function
`contributing to the life of the organism
`as a whole. Different kinds of cells make
`different proteins,
`following instruc-
`tions encoded in the DNA of their genes.
`Recent advances in molecular biology
`make it possible to alter those instruc-
`tions in bacterial cells. thereby designing
`bacteria that can synthesize nonbacteri-
`al proteins. The bacteria are “recombi—
`nants." They contain, along with their
`own genes, part or all of a gene from a
`human cell or other animal cell. If the
`inserted gene is one for a protein with an
`importantbiomedical application, a cul—
`ture of the recombinant bacteria. which
`can be grown easily and at low cost, will
`serve as an efficient factory for prod uc-
`ing that protein.
`Many laboratories in universities and
`in anemerging “applied genetics" indus-
`try are working to design bacteria able
`to synthesize such nonbacterial pro-
`teins. A growing tool kit of “genetic en—
`gineering” techniques makes it possible
`to isolate one of the million-odd genes
`of an animal cell, to fuse that gene with
`part of a bacterial gene and to insert
`the combination into bacteria. As those
`bacteria multiply they make millions of
`copies of their own genes and of the ani—
`mal gene inserted among them. If the
`animal gene is fused to a bacterial gene
`in such a way that a bacterium can treat
`the gene as one of its own, the bacteria
`will produce the protein specified by the
`animal gene. New ways of rapidly and
`easily determining the exact sequence
`of the chemical groups that constitute
`a molecule of DNA make it possible
`to learn the detailed structure of such
`"cloned" genes. After the structure is
`known it can be manipulated to produce
`DNA structures that function more ef—
`ficiently in the bacterial cell.
`
`74
`
`In this article we shall first describe
`some of these techniques in a general
`way and then tell how we and our col-
`leagues Argiris Efstratiadis, Stephanie
`Broome, Peter Lomedico and Richard
`Tizard applied them in our laboratory at
`Harvard University to copy a rat gene
`that specifies the hormone insulin, to in—
`sert the gene into bacteria and to get
`the bacteria to manufacture a precursor
`of insulin. In an exciting application of
`this technology Charles Weissmann and
`his colleagues at the University of Zu—
`rich recently constructed bacteria that
`produce human interferon. a potential-
`ly useful antiviral protein.
`
`DNA, RNA and Proteins
`
`Cells make proteins by translating a
`set of commands arrayed along a strand
`of DNA. This hereditary information
`is held in the order of four chemical
`groups along the DNA: the bases ade-
`nine, thymine, guanine and cytosine. In
`sets of threes along DNA these bases
`specify which amino acids, the funda-
`mental building blocks of proteins, are
`to be used in putting the protein togeth-
`er; the correspondence between specific
`base triplets and particular amino acids
`is called the genetic code. The part of a
`DNA molecule that incorporates the in-
`formation to specify the structure of a
`protein is called a structural gene.
`To act on this information the cell
`copies the sequence of bases from its
`genetic storehouse in DNA into another
`molecule: messenger RNA. A strand of
`DNA serves as a template for the assem-
`bly of a complementary strand of RNA
`according to base-pairing rules: adenine
`always pairs with uracil (which in RNA
`replaces DN A’s thymine) and guanine
`pairs with cytosine. In animal cells tran-
`scription takes place in the nucleus of
`the cell. The messenger—RNA molecules
`carry the information out of the nucle-
`us into the cytoplasm. where a com-
`plex molecular machine translates it into
`protein by linking together the appropri-
`
`Page 1
`
`ate amino acids. In bacteria, which have
`no nucleus, transcription and transla—
`tion take place concurrently. The mes-
`senger RNA serves as a temporary set
`of instructions. Which proteins the cell
`makes depends on which messengers it
`contains at any given time; to make a
`difl'erent protein the cell makes a new
`messenger from the appropriate struc-
`tural gene. The DNA in each cell con-
`tains all the information required at any
`time by any cell of the organism, but
`each cell “expresses.” or translates into
`protein, only a specific small portion
`of that information. How does the cell
`know which structural genes to express?
`Along with the structural
`informa-
`tion, a DNA molecule carries a series of
`regulatory commands. also written out
`as a sequence of bases. The simplest
`of these commands say in effect “Start
`here“ or “Stop here" both for the tran—
`scription and for the translation steps.
`More complicated commands say when
`and in which type of cell a specific gene
`should be used. The genetic code is the
`same in all cell nuclei, a given structural
`sequence specifying the same protein in
`every organism, but the special com-
`mands are not the same in bacteria and
`in animal cells. One of the most surpris-
`ing diflerences was discovered only in
`the past two years. The information for
`a bacterial protein is carried on a contig—
`uo us stretch of DNA. but in more com—
`plicated organisms, such as pigs and
`people,
`the structural
`information is
`broken up into segments. which are sep-
`arated along the gene by long stretches
`of other DNA called intervening DNA
`or “introns.” In such a cell a long region
`(often 10 times more than might be
`needed) is transcribed into RNA. The
`cell then processes this long RNA mole—
`cule, removing the sequence of bases
`that does not code for the protein and
`splicing together the rest
`to make a
`messenger—RNA molecule that carries
`essentially just the “start.” the structur—
`al sequence and the “stop” needed for
`translation
`SANOFI v. GENENTECH
`IPR2015-01624
`EXHIBIT _ _ _ _
`
`

`

`To persuade a bacterium to make a
`nonbacterial protein one must put into
`bacteria a DNA molecule that has a se—
`quence of bases specifying the proteirrs
`amino acids as well as the bacterial com—
`mands for transcription and translation.
`Moreover. the inserted DNA must be
`treated by the bacterium as its own so
`
`that it will be duplicated as the bacteri—
`um divides. The problem thus breaks
`down into three parts: to find the right
`structural sequence (insulin‘s, for exam—
`ple), to place it in bacteria in such a way
`that it will be maintained as the bac-
`teria grow and then to manipulate the
`surrounding information, modifying the
`
`regulatory commands so that the struc—
`tural sequence is expressed as protein.
`Once the protein is made, still further
`changes in its gene or modifications of
`the bacterium may be needed to obtain
`the protein in large encugh amounts to
`be useful.
`The constellation of
`
`recombinant—
`
`
`
`HUMAN INTERFERON synthesized in bacteria demonstrates its
`ability to block a viral infection in this biological assay. The structural
`information for making the protein interferon was obtained from hu-
`man white blood cells in the form of messenger-RNA molecules; the
`RNA then served as a template for the synthesis ol double-strand
`molecules of copy DNA, and the DNA in turn was Inserted by re-
`combinant-DNA techniques into a laboratory strain of the bacteri—
`um Escherichia coli. which synthesized the protein. For the assay di-
`lutions of an extract of the bacteria were placed in some of the wells
`of a clear plastic tray; the other wells served as controls. (The wells
`are seen through the bottom of the tray in this photograph.) Human
`cells were added to the wells and were grown to term a layer of cells
`covering the bottom of each well. A virus preparation was then added
`to the cells. Twenty—four hours later the cell layer was stained. Where
`interferon in the extracts protected the cells against the virus the cells
`survived and were stained. Where there was no interferon the virus
`killed the cells and the dead cells did not pick up the stain. The con-
`trol wells in the first column at the left contain a layer of cells that
`
`were never exposed to the virus; they accordingly appear stained. The
`control wells in the second column contain cells that have been killed
`by the virus; they look gray or clear. The control wells in the third
`column contain dilutions of a standard laboratory sample of inter-ter-
`on obtained directly from human cells; the top well has the most in-
`terferon and each succeeding well has I third as much interferon as
`the well above it. The wells in the next six columns hold dilutions of
`bacterial extracts from six dill'erent colole of E. coil in which inter-
`feron DNA was present. Five of the six columns containing the bac-
`terial extracts show evidence of interferon activity. The third extract
`tested (Column 6) had no detectable interferon; it apparently did not
`have a complete interferon gene. The synthesis of human interferon
`by the recombinant-DNA method
`manu and his colleagues at the Uoiversrty of lunch in collaboration
`with Kari Cantell of the Finnish Red Cross.
`by lliogen, SA. Interferon is synthesized by many animal cells, but
`it is Species-specific: only human interferon works for
`lugs, and it has been too scarce even for satisfactory experimentation.
`
`Page 2
`
`T5
`
`

`

`DNA techniques for placing and main-
`taining a new gene in bacteria is called
`cloning, which in this sense means the
`isolation of a specific new DNA se-
`quence in a single organism that prolif—
`erates to form a population of identical
`descendants: a clone. There are two con-
`venient ways of doing this. In one meth
`0d a small circular piece of DNA called
`
`a plasmid is the vehicle for introducing
`the new DNA into the bacterium. Plas—
`mids carry only a few genes of their own
`and are maintained in several copies in-
`side the bacterium by the bacterium’s
`own gene functions; they remain sepa-
`rate from the main set of bacterial genes
`carried on a circle of DNA about 1,000
`times larger. Alternatively the vehicle
`
`could be a virus that grows in bacteria.
`Such viruses normally have some 10 to
`50 genes of their own (a bacterium has
`several
`thousand genes) and can often
`carry other new DNA segments in place
`of some of their own. All the techniques
`we shall describe apply to both plasmids
`and viruses.
`A molecule of DNA resembles a very
`
`w
`‘I’fiTGGCAA.
`ACICCGTT
`
`EXCN
`/
`
`NTFDN
`/
`GTACTACTAI’GTAO
`CGTGA‘I'OAYICIY':
`
`GTCCAAAA‘ICCCARB
`CAGOTTTTIGGGT It:
`
`BEAU t TGC TACG T
`CCTGAACBA‘IOC
`
`lTFIAhBCFIPTICN
`
`
`WA
`
`mxlEu
`shaaa‘_
`
`RNA
`
`us
`
`u
`
`UAU u
`
`A us
`
`cvrorusu “THE-5555‘
`
`RNA
`
`
`
` AUECACUACUAUAUE GUACUAUOGGUUUUAG
`
`i THAMLATION
`mmooooooeeoow
`AMMD ACIDS
`
`PROTEINS ARE MADE in a living cell according to instructions
`encoded in the cell’s genes, which consist of specific sequences of
`chemical groups (hues) strung out along a double-strand molecule
`of DNA in the cell’s nucleus. The genetic code is “written” in lthe
`four letters A, I G and C. which stand rapectively for the four bases
`adenine, thymine, guanine and cytosine. The code is “read” in the
`three-letter sets called codons, which specify the amino acids linked
`together in the protein chain. The order of the bases can also con-
`vey regulatory commands. In multicelled organisms the structural se-
`quence, or gene, encoding a particular protein is usually hrolten into
`fragments separated by long stretches of other DNA; in this diagram
`
`the gene fragments, called exons, are represented by the black letters
`and the intervening sequences, known u introm, hy the white letters.
`The genetic information is translated into protein indirectly. First the
`entire sequence of bases is transcribed inside the nuclels from the
`DNA to a single-strand molecule of RNA. According to the base.
`pairing rules governing transcription, adenine always pairs with ura-
`cil (U) and guanine always pairs with cytosine. Next the RNA copies
`of the introns are excised from the message and the remaining RNA
`copies of the exons are joined together end to end. The reembled
`strand of messenger RNA then movw from the nucleus to the cyto-
`plasm, where the actual protein-manufacturing process takes place.
`
`ECORI
`
`l
`
`Hae |||
`
`
`CQACAAQIGGAQCTGGGTGGA
`con
`odfiircrrcsoaoorrcgpncrg
`
`GTETTGACCTCGACCCRCCT
`CCT
`CCCTAGEAQTCTCCAACCGTGAC
`
`Hoe Ill
`
`GTGGAGGTCCCG
`CACCTCCAGGGC
`
`Eco RI
`
`Hero III
`
`Hae |||
`
`GIGGAGETC
`
`gchcmso'c
`
`-._._~__~~
`
`c CAAQIGGAGCTGGGT GA
`A (ICC—WC?
`GTGT once
`
`3333
`Efififl
`
`AT TT AGAGGIJGGCAGLQ
`CCTAGAfiélQLEEfiAEEfiJGAE
`
`
`
`-..-._
`
`"""-~_-__
`
`_ _ ‘
`
`PS: I
`1
`
`Hae I||
`Hha |
`1
`
`Ave N
`I
`
`Mm"
`I.
`
`Eco RI
`EAuaH
`:
`l
`
`Hae I" Here "I
`Nul‘rtpall
`has n i
`'
`I
`'t
`'I
`-
`
`Hpa ll
`L
`
`HM!
`_l. _
`
`DNA CAN BE CUT into comparatively short lengtlu with the aid
`of restriction endonucleasa, special enzymes that recognize specific
`hase sequences at which they cause the molecule to come apart. For
`example, Eco R], the first such enzyme discovered, recognizes a cer-
`tain six-base sequence and cuts the molecule wherever this sequence
`appears, WhHEflS Hoe I“, another restriction enzyme, operates at a
`certain four-base sequence. Since the probability of finding a partic-
`
`oiar four-base sequence is greater than that of finding a particular
`six-base sequence, one would expect Hoe [II to cut DNA more often
`than Eco RI. Accordingly one Eco RI site and two Hoe 11] sites are
`represented in the DNA segment at the top, which corresponds to
`part of the gene coding for insulin in rat cells. The same DNA con-
`tains recognition sites for a number of other restriction enzymes, as
`is shown in the line diagram of a larger gene fragment at the bottom.
`
`76
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Whatis the right wine for candlelight
`and Saturday night?
`
`
`
`‘M VII-ruin lac. M. Shh-t. Cal-I‘m
`
`Almadén.
`
`Vintage-dating makes it right. As you come to appreciate fine wmes. you learn that
`there are subtle differences from one vintage year to the next. 30 at Almadén, we vintage-
`.
`s
`.
`date our fine varietal wines to enhance your appreciation and enjoyment of these
`differences. We take great care to use only the best of each year s harvest. Thls assures
`you of superior vintage wines year after year.
`Page 4
`
`3
`'
`.PH _
`ii _
`L
`' '
`‘ ‘R a
`‘1
`
`Almadén makes it right.
`
`

`

`
`
`lEGISlA'I'ED INTO
`DIOCRITY.
`
`l
`
`Yet, fortunately, these gloomy
`No indeed. The challenge lies
`The challenge that faces the
`predictions do not take into ac—
`in meeting the myriad of societal
`automaker of the 1980's lies
`demands and still building auto— count the inventive genius and
`not in meeting tougher pollution
`! mobiles that are worth driving.
`the obsessive determination of
`standards, nor in coping with
`ever more restrictive safety regu- |
`Pessimists darkly predict
`theengineersatBMWin Munich,
`' lations—not even in accommo— that it cannot be done and point Germany to build extraordinary
`i dating the petroleum shortages
`to the depressing number
`. automobiles.
`that are fast becoming a regular
`of uninspired automobiles on the
`Against all odds the BMW
`I summer occurrence.
`market as incogtatggyenible proof.
`not only meets the demands of
`IQ [9?9 BMW of North Antenna. Inc The BMW trademark and logo are 'egrstered Iradernarksol Bayerlsche Motoren Werke. A .G
`
`

`

`
`
`I
`
`'
`‘
`
`
`SAFETY BEYOND STURDY
`injected, overhead cam engine
`BUMPEBS.
`responds in a manner that can
`At BMW, automotive safety
`only be described as exhilarating.
`was of primary concern long
`Yet, the 320i (with 5-speed
`standard transmission) delivers
`before the first bumper law was
`an impressiveEE EPA estimated written.
`The passenger compartment
`mpg, 36 estimated highway
`is encased in a solid steel “cage.” ,
`mileage and, based on these fig~
`ugeg an estimated mpg range of , 80 strong is this construction
`,
`
`383 miles and a highway range _ that the car could be dropped on |
`' its nose from the fourth floor of a
`of 551 miles.
`building without significant dam-
`(Naturally our fuel efficiency
`age to the compartment itself.
`figures are for comparison pur-
`. poses only. Your actual mileage
`Yet with all its sheer strength
`and range may vary, depending
`—its computer-programmed
`on speed, weather and trip
`“crush zones,” its double~braking
`length. Your actual highway mile l systems—the BMW features a
`age and highway range will most
`safetydevice even moreestimable.
`Its exceptional responsiveness
`likely be lower.)
`And, while the BMW provides
`and handling characteristics give
`it the ability to avoid accidents
`as long a list of luxury items as
`one could saner require, its lux— I as well as merely survive them.
`All in all, in a time of lowered
`ury is purposefully engineered to
`automotive expectations, amidst
`help prevent driver fatigue.
`increasing mediocrity, the engi-
`Vital controls are within easy
`, neers at BMW have actually
`reach; the tachometer, speed-
`ometerandancillaryinstruments
`improved the BMW.
`are well—marked and easy to read.
`If you’d care to judge for
`Its front seats are designed
`I yourself, telephone
`to hold their occupants firmly in
`your nearest BMW
`place, and are so thoroughly ad-
`dealer to arrange a
`justable that it is all but a mathe
`thorough test drive
`matical impossibility not to find
`at your convenience.
`'I'IIE lll'l'llfll'l’l DRIVING MACHINE.
`a comfodablepsagatgng position.
`BMW, MUNICH, GERMANY
`
`I i
`
`' society, it also provides the sort
`of exhilarating driving experience
`, that automotive enthusiasts have
`all but given up for lost.
`
`A SEEMINGLY INCONGRUOUS
`COMBINATION OF
`LUXURY PERFORMANCE AND
`EFFICIENCY
`Conventional automotive wis—
`dom has it that, inevitably, one
`must choose between luxury,
`performance and fuel efficiency.
`A sufficiency in any one necessi-
`tating a corresponding insuffi-
`ciency in another.
`And in the face of this, the
`BMW seems all the more re
`markable for requiring no com-
`promise whatsoever.
`Round a particularly sticky
`curve and the legendary BMW
`suspension system—indepen-
`dent on all four wheelsiflexes
`with an uncanny resiliency that
`i makes one feel as if the car
`were built into the roadway. A
`sensation that results from highly
`advanced suspension technology
`and the virtually perfect integra-
`tion of man and machine.
`
`f
`
`The BMW power plant-—
`whether4or6cy|inder—haslong
`been a model for modern design.
`Pressthe acceleratorand the fuel-
`
`

`

`long, twisted thread. A bacterium has
`one millimeter of DNA in a continuous
`string of some three million bases folded
`back and forth several thousand times
`into a space less than a micron (a thou—
`sandth of a millimeter) across. in human
`cells the DNA is packed into 46 chro-
`mosomes. each one containing about
`four centimeters in a single pieceI the
`total amount corresponding to about
`three billion bases. How can one find
`and work with a single gene only a few
`thousand bases long? Fortunately na—
`ture has devised certain enzymes (pro—
`teins that carry out chemical reactions)
`that solve part of the problem. These
`special enzymes. called restriction endo-
`nucleases. have the ability to scan the
`long thread of DNA and to recognize
`particular short sequences as landmarks
`at which to cut
`the molecule apart.
`Some 40 or 50 of these enzymes are
`known, each of which recognizes differ-
`ent landmarks; each restriction enzyme
`therefore breaks up any given DNA re-
`producibly into a characteristic set of
`short pieces, from a few hundred to a
`few thousand bases longI which one can
`isolate by length.
`One can clone such DNA pieces in
`bacteria. As a first step one purifies the
`circle of plasmid DNA. The sequences
`of the plasmids are such that one of
`the restriction enzymes will recognize a
`unique site on the plasmid and cut the
`circle open there. One can insert a cho—
`sen DNA fragment into the opening by
`using a variety of enzymatic techniques
`that connect its ends to those of the cir—
`cle. Ordinarily this recombinant—DNA
`molecule could not pass through the
`bacterial cell wall. A dilute solution of
`calcium chloride renders the bacteria
`permeable, however;
`in a mixture of
`treated cells and DNA a few bacteria
`will take up the hybrid plasmid. These
`cells can be found among all those that
`did not take up the DNA if a gene on the
`plasmid provides a property the bacteri-
`um must have to survive, such as antibi—
`otic resistance. Then any bacterium car—
`rying the plasmid will be resistant to the
`antibiotic. whereas all the others will be
`killed by it. When one spreads the mix—
`ture of bacteria out on an agar plate con—
`taining nutrients and the antibioticI each
`single bacterium with a plasmid will
`grow into a separate colony of about
`100 million cells. A single colony carli'lzldg by "m
`chosen and grown further to yield bil-
`lions of cells, each of which contains
`identical copies of the new DNA se-
`quence in a recombinant plasmid.
`
`The Sequencing of DNA
`
`The procedures we have outlined so
`far are followed in “shotgun” cloning
`experiments. One breaks up the DNA of
`an animal cell into millions of pieces
`and inserts each piece into a different
`bacterium. In this way a number of col-
`lections of all the fragments of human,
`
`BACTERIAL PLASMID DNA
`
`© ‘
`
`1’ Pst
`
`Q
`
`TERMINAL
`T
`\L HANSFERASE
`
`MESSENGER RNA
`FFIOM ANIMAL CELL
`
`I:
`REVEFI SE
`THANSCRIF'TASE
`
`MESSENGER FINA
`
`d cDNA
`
`cDNA
`
`cDNA
`
`1’ ALKAU
`
`l DNA FOLYNEHASE
`
`DOUflE-STRAIND DNA
`
`J/ St MEASE
`
`TERMINAL
`TRANSFEFIASE
`
`Mix AND
`
`\ ANNEAL /
`
`UPTAKE BY CELL;
`REPAIR BY
`CELLULAR ENZYMES
`
`
`
`RECOMBINANT-DNA TECHNIQUE for making a protein in bacteria calls for the Insertion
`of a fragment of animal DNA that encodes the protein into a plasmid, a small circular piece of
`bacterial DNA, which in turn serves as the vehicle for introducing the DNA into the bacterium.
`The plasmid DNA is cleaved with the appropriate restriction enzyme and the new DNA se-
`quence is inserted into the op_
`Iect the new DNA’s ends to those of the broken plasmid circle. In the procedure illustrated
`here, for example, a special enzyme, reverse transcriptase, is first used to copyI the genetic infor-
`mation from a single-strand molecule of messenger RNA into a single strand oi copy DNA.
`The RNA template is then destroyed, and a second strand of DNA is made with another en-
`zyme, DNA polymerase. Still another enzyme, 51 nuclease, serva to break the covalent linkage
`between the two DNA strands. In the next step the double-strand DNA is joined to the plasmid
`by first using the enzyme terminal transferase to extend the ends of the DNA with a short se—
`quence of identical bases (in this case four cytosiua} and then annealing the DNA to the plas—
`mid DNA. to which a complementary sequence of basm (four guaniua) has been added. Bac-
`terial enzymes eventually fill the gaps in the regenerated circular DNA molecule and seal the
`connection between the inserted DNA and the plasmid DNA. The
`plasmid used by
`the authors to make rat proinsulin in bacteria, designated 983322, incorporates two genes that
`confer resktance to two antibiotics: penicillin and tetracycline. The plasmid is cleaved by the
`restriction enzyme Psi at a recognition site that lies in the midst of the gene encoding penicillin-
`ase (the enzyme that breaks down penicillin). The added DNA destroys thk enzymatic activity,
`but the tetracycline resistance remaim and is used to identify bacteria containing the plasmid.
`
`80
`
`Page I"
`
`

`

`PAUL HOOPER KNOWS MORE ABOUT TRAFFIC SAFETY
`THAN 3M DOES.
`
`«.r1r_'.-_~,
`
`THAT’S WHY WE LISTE...._
`:-[H'-r Lith JEMLJ!
`Today. Put-In. 5):]!th E— nun-um
`L‘v‘hl Run M: .u-
`By fish-rung l0 him. 3M can
`"IH'H‘IW. w m - 3M harms: Rm IS
`like Paul reach L! (.flrEIL-rnpurdry
`cream mow Ingenious products for
`i._'..u;m1\ Rina .
`‘--.:I"1:.-| -r
`.1f KHHJ
`technolwv for Arman-org Lm: the HM
`macljcal use And lha! 3 our |0b AT
`i'-: 'Imh- '."v.i-.;.'1I:‘I:h.\n Hrs '.]|"I'_‘.|\'.'ri[1'k1
`Opllmm ' Syb‘h.‘ 71 mm Hultc'V‘Lihuully
`3M, hslerm \r; H; mch than gust gown
`“"1" PM“ WA"; -
`--' I'IIS I1
`[0
`Manges lmfhr: mm,- frwn rig-(t I":
`philosophy It 5. mal I: I our mum:-
`' "
`'-
`1 h. -‘.u-' WAN [c'i- kfi-PLI
`gram! 10 hi)le 'rnEJrqgalmg‘y- Vi"‘h|t.3l‘.‘-} :';-.“.
`'
`'
`.
`“'3‘ "Pi" 55"“?
`f-(‘ “19 St)! ’r‘ug Sr}: 111w ._:HI'1 5;. HM Ann: m
`when new IL'u.:hrm|I_Ju\.- u; m '1.‘I_'1r'.-I.'1
`Paul Will hi" anmng; [hu ?:-"3!
`
`

`

`’Ihe one-chip computer:
`offspring of the transistor
`
`. J UM'IULMI’UOILI M“- -,4- ._
`
`-- ‘n-n— ism“. rt ;,_ .
`
`‘
`
`The MAC-4 one-chip computer, developed for a. variety
`of telecommunications applications, is compared to a
`standard-sized paper clip. The chip’s numerous functional
`areas are labeled.
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`One of the transistor’s latest
`descendants is the Bell System’s
`30,000-e1ement MAC-4 “com-
`puter-on-a-chip.” It’s another in
`a long line of microelectronic
`developments that have come
`from Bell Laboratories.
`The MAC—4 is so efficient that
`
`a program written 011 it takes
`25 percent less storage space than
`that required by most other
`microcomputers. Its assembler
`language, C, also developed at
`Bell Labs, has features that make
`MAC-4 easier to program, debug
`and maintain. And the MAC-4
`can handle anything from nibbles
`to bytes to words with its 4-, 8-, 12—,
`and 16-bit operations capacity.
`Like other one-chip computers,
`the MAC-4 has suflicient memory
`to support its varied tasks—
`3000 nibbles of read-only memory
`and 200 nibbles of random access
`memory coupled to 34 input/out-
`put ports.
`Fabricated with the latest
`
`CMOS technology, the MAC-4
`needs little power. Thus it is well
`matched to a variety of telecom-
`munications applications.
`
`It started with the transistor
`
`MAC-4 is just one current
`example of the many micro-
`electronic devices to come from
`Bell Labs since we started the
`
`solid-state revolution with the
`invention of the transistor in 1947.
`Over the past three decades, our
`advances in materials, processing,
`and devices have been vital to
`solid-state technology. These
`include:
`' The Junction Transistor
`
`' Crystal Pulling
`' Zone Refining
`' Field-Effect Transistor
`' Diffusion
`° Solar Cell
`' Oxide Masking
`' Thermocompression Bonding
`' Photolithography
`' Epitaxial Film Process
`' Magnetic Bubble Memory
`' Charge-Coupled Device
`' Semiconductor Heterostructure
`
`Laser Used in Lightwave
`Communications
`' Electron-Beam Exposure
`System
`
`Today and tomorrow
`Today, we continue to make
`important contributions to solid-
`state technology. For example,
`we’ve developed a rugged
`65,536-bit RAM that can tolerate
`processing faults. Corrections can
`be made on the chip itself, so we
`can get more usable chips out of
`each manufacturing batch—and
`thus lower unit costs.
`In materials processing, we’ve
`
`developed a technique for
`precisely controlling the growth
`of successive atomic layers of
`single crystal materials. This
`“molecular beam epitaxy” process
`is finding increasing use within
`Bell Labs and elsewhere in the
`electronics industry. We’ve used
`it to fabricate a device that
`permits us to double the speed
`of electrons by channeling them
`into crystal layers where they
`meet less resistance.
`Other advances, in anay
`lithography and new resist
`materials, for example, promise
`to help place more elements on
`microelectronic devices and thus
`
`enhance their ability to perform
`important tasks.
`As the solid-state revolution
`
`continues, these and other
`developments from Bell Labs will
`play an important part in it.
`What’s important to us is the
`promise these advances offer for
`new telecommunications products
`and services. Like the transistor,
`MAC-4 and its solid-state
`relatives will find more and more
`applications in the nationwide
`telecommunications network.
`For information about employment, write:
`
`Bell Laboratories, Room. 30303,
`0‘00 Mountain Avenue.
`Murray Hill, NJ. 079”.
`Please include a résmné.
`An equal opportunity rmpioycr.
`
`@ Bell Laboratories
`
`From Science: Service
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`mouse, rat and fly DNA have been
`made. One can determine the structure
`of any one of these cloned DNA's by
`breaking up the hybrid plasmid with a
`restriction enzyme, separating the re—
`sulting DNA fragments. determining
`the base sequence of each of the frag-
`ments and then putting the sequences
`together to deduce the entire structure
`of the cloned DNA.
`There are two methods for sequenc—
`ing DNA. Both exploit reference points
`created by restriction—enzyme cleavage
`of the DNA at a specific short sequence
`and then work out the rest of the se-
`quence by measuring the distance of
`each base from that cut. They do this
`by creating a set of radioactively labeled
`molecules, each of which extends from
`the common point to one of the occur-
`rences of a specific base. When these
`molecules are separated by size and de~
`tected by their radioactivity, the length
`of the smallest one shows the position of
`the first occurrence of that base; longer
`molecules correspond to later occur-
`rences. The pattern created by the anal-
`ysis of these molecules looks like a lad—
`der. From the positions of the rungs one
`reads off the lengths. By comparing four
`such patterns one reads off a sequence.
`One technique. devised by Allan M.
`Maxam and one of us (Gilbert), makes
`use of chemical reagents that detect the
`difl’erent chemical properties of the bas—
`es and break the DNA there. To gener-
`ate the set of fragments the reactions are
`done for a short time. so that the mole—
`cule is broken only occasionally instead
`of everywhere the base occurs; different
`molecules will be broken at diflerent
`places. Four dill‘erent sets of reagents
`are used to generate the four patterns.
`The radioactive label is attached direct—
`ly to the end of the particular restriction
`fragment one wants to sequence, so that
`only the molecules stretching from the
`labeled end to the break are detected by
`their radioactivity.
`de—
`The other sequencing method,
`vised by Frederick Sanger of the British
`Medical Research Council Laborato—
`ry of Molecular Biology in Cambridge,
`makes a DNA copy with an enzyme and
`stops the sequential synthesis, and hence
`the elongation of the copy, by blocking
`the movement of the enzyme at a specif—
`ic base. Here the radioactive label is in—
`corporated into the newly synthesized
`molecule in four different
`reactions.
`Both methods can provide the sequence
`of from 200 to 300 bases in a single ex-
`periment. One of the small plasmids in-
`volved in our cloning experiments was
`sequenced in a year by Gregory Sul-
`clifl'e, who worked out the order of the
`4,357 bases on one strand and checked
`them by working out the complementa-
`ry strand.
`Any DNA region carried on a plas-
`mid can be isolated and sequenced.
`The difficulty is not in determining the
`sequence but in obtaining the specific
`
`RADIOACTIVE
`LABEL
`
`
`
`2
`
`3
`
`TEST TUBE 2
`
`TEST TUBE 3
`
`TEST TUBE 4
`
`BASE G
`
`DESTROY
`BASES A AND G
`
`DESTROY
`BASES T mo 6
`
`DES—TROY
`BASE c
`
`4
`
`I
`_ I.IlL92
`9
`
`5
`
`ill
`
`
`EI00
`
`
`
`
`J
`
`r:
`9.1
`
`DESTROYED
`BASE
`
`[E
`
`5
`
`oESrSoon
`
`— [all
`_
`v
`'I
`— G
`I
`
`
`
`LONGER
`
`SHOHTEH
`
`
`SEQUENCING OF DNA, in the method devised by one of the authors (Gilbert) and Allen M.
`Mam, begins with the attachment at a radioactive label to one end of each strand of double-
`strand DNA (1). The strands of trillions of molecules are separated (2) and a preparation of one
`of the tvro kinds of strands is divided among four test tubes (3). Each tube contains a chemical
`agent that selectively destroys one or two of the four base A, T, G and C, thereby cleaving the
`strand at the site of those bases; the reaction is controlled so that onlyr some of the strands are
`cleaved at each of the sites where a given base appears, generating a set of fragments at dltier-
`ent sizes. A strand containing three 6'5 (4'), for example, would produce a mixture of three ra-
`dioactively labeled molecules (5). The reactions break DNA at the G‘s alone, at the 6’s and the
`A's, at the Is and the C‘s, and at the ca; alone. The molecules are separated according to
`size by electrophoresis on a gel; the shorter- the molecule, the farther it migrates down the gel
`(6). The radioactive label produces an tillage of each group of molecules on an X-ray film (7).
`When four films are placed side by side [3], the ladder-like array of bands represents all the suc-
`cessively shorter fragments at the original strand of DNA (9). Knowing what base or
`of
`bases was destroyed to produce each of the fragments, one can start at the bottom and read oil'
`a leftpto-rtght sequence of beam (1'9), which in turn yields the sequence of the second strand.
`
`84
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`l' ,...,r| I..
`
`..
`
`'....
`
`--.-1 tr
`
`Ii
`
`'r
`
`-|-. 1...”
`
`TH
`
`MOORE COUNTY JAIL is only one
`of the sights you'll see in Lynchburg. Tennessee.
`
`There's a lunchroorn called the White Rabbit
`
`that used to be a turn-of—the-century saloon.
`There's a store where they sell walking-Sticks.
`whittling kits and Tennessee hams. And
`naturally there's Jack Daniel DiStillery
`where smo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket