throbber
Sound. 3. ImrmmeI., Vol. 5, 1976.
`
`Bence Jones Proteins and Light Chains of
`Immunoglobulins
`
`XIV. Conformational Dependency and Molecular Localization of the Kappa
`(K) and Lambda (1) Antigenic Determinants
`
`A. SOLOMON
`
`University of Tennessee Memorial Research Center, University of Tennessee
`Center for the Health Sciences, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
`
`Solomon, A. Bence Jones Proteins and Light Chains of Immunoglobulins. XIV.
`Conformational Dependency and Molecular Localization of the Kappa (it) and
`Lambda 0.) Antigenic Determinants. Scand. }. Inmzmwl. 5, 685-695, I976.
`
`The region on the light chain molecule responsible for expression of the it and ).
`antigenic determinants was determined by comparative imrnunochetnical analyses
`of intact Bence Jones proteins and naturally occurring or enzymatically derived
`fragments of Bence Jones proteins that lacked extensive portions of the V region
`or part of the C region. The reactivity of these fragments with numerous antisera
`having specificity for light—-chain antigenic determinants indicated the essentiality
`of the intact light polypeptide chain for expression of the K and 1 antigenic deter-
`minants. The conformational dependency of the K and 1 antigenic determinants
`was also evidenced by denaturation-renaturation studies on x and ). chains. The
`V domain, C domain, and interdornain ‘switch’ region contribute to the expres-
`sion of 1-: or 1 antigenicity and to certain isotypic and allotypic specificities.
`
`A. Salomon, University of Tennessee Memorial Research Center. Knoxtriik. TN
`37920, USA.
`
`Immunochemical and structural analyses (9,
`13, 27, 34) of Bence Jones proteins, myeloma
`proteins,
`and Waldenstrfim macroglobulins
`have provided evidence that the light polypep-
`tide chains of all
`immunoglobulins consist of
`two chemically distinct types designated kappa
`(ac) and lambda (A). As evident from sequence
`analyses of homogeneous x and A light chains —
`that is, Bence Jones proteins (12) — both types
`of light chains share certain characteristic struc-
`tural features: each type has an amino—terminal
`portion of ~10? residues of variant sequence
`(VI) and a carboxyl-terminal portion of c\a107
`residues of constant sequence (CL). The VL and
`CL are under separate genetic control (17) and
`exist as two compact domains (designated V
`and C,
`respectively)
`linked by an extended
`cxnl0—residue section of the light polypeptide
`chain termed the ‘switch’
`region (31, 35). A
`given light chain may be distinguished as x or
`
`A on the basis of the amino acid sequence of
`either the V or C domain (9). However,
`the
`domain or region on the light chain responsible
`for the immunochemical recognition of the x or
`A antigenic determinants has not been estab-
`lished; it is not known whether these determi-
`
`nants rcside on the CL or V1‘ or whether their
`expression requires the intact light polypeptide
`chain.
`
`The relation between immunoglobulin struc-
`ture and antigenicity has been established
`through studies of the naturally occurring or
`enzymatically derived fragments and the chem-
`ically
`produced
`subunits
`oi
`homogeneous
`immunoglobulins (Bence Jones proteins, mys-
`loma. proteins, and Waldenstrom macroglobu-
`lins)
`characteristically found in association
`with multiple myeloma and related plasma cell-
`lymphocyte dyscrasias (43). The identification
`and characterization of urinary low-molecular
`
`SANOFI v. GENENTECH
`SANOFI V. GENENTECH
`IPR2015-01624
`IPR2015-01624
`EXHIBIT 2089
`EXHIBIT 2089
`
`
`

`
`536 A. Solomon
`
`weight proteins antigenically related to the V
`or C regions of Bence Jones proteins (2, 4, 7,
`IO, 44, 48, 52, 53, 56), the availability of un-
`usual Bence Jones proteins with extensive V re-
`gion deletions (15, 42), and the ability to cleave
`specifically Bence Jones proteins into V]; and
`CL-related fragments (20, 45) have provided
`the means for determining immunochemically
`the region on the light—chain molecule respon-
`sible for the ac and A antigenic determinants.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Proteins. Urine samples containing Bence
`Jones proteins and fragments of Bence Jones
`proteins were obtained from our patients with
`multiple myeloma. The specimens were collec-
`ted without preservative and were maintained
`at 0‘"'C to 4°C throughout the 24-h collection
`period. Subsequently, a sample of each 24-11
`specimen was frozen and stored at —20°C or
`—70°C. The remaining urine specimen was 1yo-
`philized after extensive dialyses at 4'"'C in 23/
`32 Visking tubing (Union Carbide Corp., New
`York) against deionized double-distilled water.
`Preparative procedures. Bence Jones pro-
`teins and fragments of Bence Jones proteins
`were isolated from urine specimens by zone
`electrophoresis on starch or Pevikon blocks and
`then purified by gel filtration through poly-
`acrylamide columns as previously described
`(45). The A chain Mcg (14), A chain Sm (15),
`and x chain Sac (42) were furnished by Dr. Al-
`len B. Edmundson, Dr. Elliott F. Osserman.
`
`respectively. The
`and Dr. Dorothy M. Parr,
`methods used for the preparation and isolation
`of light chains and of the papain-derived Fab
`fragment of PH 7G-globulin were as described
`previously (45).
`The Bence Jones proteins were cleaved by
`pepsin into constant half-related (CE ) and va-
`riant half-related (VE)
`fragments (45). The
`digestions were performed with an enzyme to
`protein ratio of 1:100 in 0.05M glycine—HCl
`buffer, pH 3.4, at 37° C (or at 55° C) and ter-
`minated by raising the pH of each reaction
`mixture to neutrality by adding 1M Tris base.
`These light chain fragments were isolated by
`
`zone electrophoresis and purified by gel filtra-
`tion (45).
`lmmunoebemical procedures. Antisera were
`prepared in albino New Zealand rabbits to x-
`and )\-—type Bence Jones proteins,
`to the light
`chains and the Fab fragment derived from FII
`yG—globulin, and to intact FII yG-globulin.
`The methods used for the preparation of anti-
`sera and for the immunoelectrophoretic and
`immunodiffusion analyses were as described
`previously (46). The lnv typing of x chains
`was performed by Dr. Arthur G. Steinberg.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Urine specimens from certain of our patients
`with multiple myeloma and Bence Jones pro-
`teinuria who have received high doses of corti-
`costeroids as part of their treatment regimen
`were found to contain a low-molecular-weight
`protein related to the Bence Jones proteins but
`not identical
`to either the V,‘ or the CL (48).
`The new components, designated C;‘_, were
`found to be structurally and antigenically most
`closely related to the carboxyl-terminal half of
`the light polypeptide chain, although each com-
`ponent was 6 to 25 amino acid residues longer
`than the CL-related fragment derived in vitro
`by peptic cleavage (CE) of the light chain (48).
`The amino-terminal sequences of CE isolated
`from urine specimens of Patients Wms, Oak,
`and Edw and the C11: prepared by pepsin cleav-
`
`Table I. In vivo (Cf) and in vitro (CE) constant—half—
`related fragments of it Bence Jones proteins
`Amino-terminus
`
`Protein
`
`Cf Wms
`CI’: Oak
`Cf Edw
`Ci’. Len
`
`Residue
`
`Positioni-
`
`Asp
`Thrflle
`Val
`Ile
`
`92
`97f106'["|'
`110
`117
`
`1- The numbers indicate the position of the residues
`along the amino acid sequence of M. Bence Jones
`protein Roy (9).
`
`H‘ Protein Oak consisted of two components of ap-
`proximately equal concentration; the amino-termini of
`components one and two corresponded to positions 9'?
`and 106, respectively.
`
`

`
`Lacah'zan'a1t of it and it Armlgeni‘.-: Determirtants
`
`687
`
`Table II. Amino-terminal sequences of it Bence Jones protein fragments
`
`92
`
`100
`
`‘WC
`
`III)
`
`I20
`
`
`
`CE wms Asp lle Phe Pro Gly Thr Phe (Ely Gln Gly Thr Lys Val Glu Ile L3.rsArgThrVal AlaA|'.IPrt>SerVulPheIle Phe Pro Pro
`‘f
`
`CE Oak 1
`Phe Gly
`cg; Oak 2
`Cf: Edw
`
`CE Len -—-j
`1" The solid lines indicate sequence identity to C* Wrns.
`
`age of Bence Jones protein Len were deter-
`mined by Dr.
`Donald Capra. The amino-
`terminal residues and sequences of the Cl‘: com-
`ponents and the CE fragment are given in
`Tables I and II.
`
`The reactivity of the CE components Wms,
`Oak, and Edw and the CE Len fragment was
`compared with that of intact x Bence Jones
`proteins Wms, Oak, Edw, and Len by immu-
`noelectrophotetic analyses of urine specimens
`Wins, Oak, and Edw (containing both C: and
`Bence Jones protein) and of a sample of Bence
`Jones protein Len cleaved partially by pepsin
`into CE and VE (45). Antisera prepared
`against
`the homologous Bence Jones proteins
`Wms, Oak, Edw, and Len, and antisera prepar-
`ed against 35 heterologous -/_ Bence Jones pro-
`teins were utilized for
`these analyses. With
`anti-homologous protein antisera, the CE com-
`ponents and the CE fragment were antigeni-
`
`cally cleficient as compared with the intact
`Bence Jones protein (Fig.
`1); absorption of
`these antisera with a heterologous J-C chain left
`reactions only with the homologous
`intact
`Bence Jones proteins. Striking differences in the
`reactivity of the C[_—related components were
`found with the anti—heterologous x chain anti~
`sera. Certain antiscra reacted weakly or not at
`all with the CI’: components and the CE frag-
`ment. Differences were also evident in the in-
`
`formed by the
`tensity of the precipitin arcs
`different CI’: components. The results obtained
`with the homologous and two representative
`heterologous anti-x chain antisera are also
`shown in Fig. I. With the anti-;,: Isr antiserum,
`the CE components and the CE fragment reac-
`ted with equal intensity, each forming a precip-
`itin reaction of identity with the intact Bence
`Jones protein. However, the anti—;: Bre antise-
`rum did not react at all with C{’_ Len and reac-
`
`WMS
`
`EDW
`
`LEN
`
`- nnI1-homo! BJF’
`
`' CInI1‘KlsI
`
`— - 0I'1|1‘KBl'£
`
`111
`
` 1
`
`1
`
`if
`
`Q
`
`1
`
`1
`
`cf EJP
`
`cf
`
`BJF
`
`saw
`
`cf
`
`c[
`
`3.49 v[
`
`l. Irnmunoelectrophoreric analyses of intact polypeptide chains and related fragments of four it Hence
`Fig.
`Jones proteins. The antigen wells under the designations WMS, OAK, and ED W" contained urine specimens
`from Patients Wrns, Oak, and Lidw, respectively; the antigen wells under the designation LEN contained a
`sample of Bence Jones protein Len subjected to limited pepsin proteolysis at 37"‘C. Each sample was tested
`against an antiserum prepared to the homologous Bence Jones protein (anti-fioiriol. B_‘iP) and against antisera
`prepared to heterologous it Bence Jones proteins Isr and Bre {anti-it Isr and anti-it Bra). B_‘fP : Bence Jones
`protein; C: = constant-half-related light-chain component found in vivo; Cf and VI’?
`; constant-halll and
`variant-ha1f—related light-chain fragments, respectively, produced in vitro by pepsin proteolytie cleavage of
`Bence Jones protein. The anode was located to the left.
`
`
`
`

`
`683
`
`.4 .
`
`.S'o}oJ-um:
`
`K Wms
`
`KJO
`
`Klsr
`
`xoak
`
`KEdw
`
`K Len
`
`anti - KBre
`
`Tig. 2. Imrnunoditfusion analysis of six >: llenee Jones
`proteins. The peripheral antigen wells contained six
`different anti-V. Hence Jones proteins {:4 Writs. X Oak.
`7.
`Ifdti‘.
`if. Len.
`it Isr. and 3-! _7m. The central anti-
`serum well contained an antiserum prepared against
`:«: Hence Jones protein lire (tmtf-‘/_ Brc).
`
`ted only weakly with Cl‘: Edw and CE Oak.
`but :1 strong reaction occurred with CE Wins.
`The anti-x Bre antiserum was a potent anti-:4
`antiserum;
`the prccipitin t‘L".1Ctl0I‘lS olzitained
`with six ;¢ Bence _]ones proteins are shown in
`the in1n1unoCliffusion analysis depicted in Fig.
`2. Differences in the reactivity among the CE
`components were evident with many other
`.tnti—.i-.--chitin antisera; generally, the intensity of
`
`WMS
`
`OAK
`
`precipitin reactions among the C,‘-related frag-
`ments followed the order: C?‘ Wnis 73> C It Oak
`.7“ Cl’: Edw > C}: Len.
`Other types of antiscr-.1 with specificity for
`5-! antigenic determinants also showed this same
`
`pattern of reactivity with the Clgrelated com—
`ponents, as illustrated in Fig. 3 by the reactions
`obtained with ttntisera to intact Fll yG-globu-
`lin and its subunits. The anti-Fl} light chains.
`anti-FII Fab, and antiAFll y(_}-globulin nntisera
`did not form visible prccipitin reactioiis with
`CE Len, and reactetl only weal-(ly with CF
`Edw and C: Oak;
`-.1 more intense precipitin
`reaction occurred with CE Writs. All
`three
`antisera reacted strongly with intact .1: (as well
`as intact A.) chains and, further, had the capac-
`ity to distinguish between 3 and .\ light chains.
`The results of
`immunodii-fusion analysis of
`three 2: and three A Bence Jones proteins with
`the anti—Fll Fab antiserum are shown in Fig. 4.
`We li-aye not as yet detected C:-type com-
`ponents in urine specimens from our patients
`excreting A Bence Jones proteins. For this rea-
`son we treated six different A Bence Jones pro-
`teins with pepsin at 37 ‘C or at 55"C (40) to
`generate
`components in an effort to test the
`reactivity of our anti—i\ chain antisera with CL-
`related fragments. The reactivity of intact A
`
`
`
`‘ uni: ' homo! 8.)?
`
`~ nnli-FII L'chmrI'.~
`
`- anti-F 3 Feb
`
`- onh-FE
`
`cf sap
`
`cf
`
`asp
`
`sap
`
`l
`
`C
`
`BJP
`
`a
`VL
`
`Immunoelectrophoretic analyses of intact polypeptide chains and related fragments of [our 2!. Hence
`Fig. 3.
`_l ones proteins. The antigen wells under the designations l"MS. ()rlK_. and l:'Dl.l"' contained urine specimens
`from Patients '06-'ms. Oak, and Edw. respectively; the antigen wells under the designation L1:'.’\-' contained a
`sample of licence Jones protein Len subjected to limited pepsin 1:-roteolysis at 37 ‘C. Each sample was tested
`against an antiserum prepared to the hornologous Bence Jones protein (aimllmmoi. 3'71"") and against antisera
`prepared to the light chains of F1] 7G-globulin (anti-I"II I.-chairzsj, the papain-derived 1-‘ah fragment of F1]
`- constant-
`-{G-globulin (mitt-}"II Fab), and to F11 ‘(G-globulin (ar.ru'~FU). Bj’P -- Hence Jones protein; ('I;_
`half-related light-chain component found in vivo; (IE and
`= eonstant—half- and variant—half-related light-
`chain fragments, respectively. produced in vitro by pepsin proteolytic cleavage of Bence Jones protein.
`The anode was located to the lelt.
`
`
`
`

`
`Localization of X. and ). zlririgerzic Determinants
`
`689
`
`Kwms
`
`G)
`
`G)
`
`—onri- nmcq
`
`Pepsin Dunes!
`ts5°cmuco
`
`_
`
`- anh- Fn L'ChflIl\§
`
`_
`
`r
`""'
`
`H L
`'
`
`‘
`
`).Hil
`
`(Len
`
`».CIe
`
`anti— FII Fab
`
`Fig. -1. Irnrnunodiffusion analysis of three 1’. and three
`}. Bence Jones proteins. The peripheral antigen
`wells contained three :2. Bence Jones proteins (:4
`Writs, 7. Eda-, and 1»: Len) and three 3'. Bence Jones
`proteins O. Meg,
`1. Cle, and It H17). The central
`well contained an antiserum prepared against
`the
`papain-derived Fab fragment of FIT 7G-globulin
`(anti-PI] Fab).
`
`Bence Jones protein Meg and CE Meg (formed
`by partial peptic proteolytic cleavage of pro-
`tein Mcg) is presented in Fig. 5. This immuno-
`electrophoretic analysis shows that the antise-
`rum prepared to Bence Jones protein Meg reac-
`
`1
`T
`HJF
`cf
`intact
`Immunoelectrophoretic analysis of
`:>.
`Fig.
`polypeptide chain and constant-half~relatcd fragment
`of a 1 Bence Jones protein. The antigen wells contain-
`ed a sample of 1 Benee Jones protein Meg subjected
`to limited pepsin proteolysis at SEC. The upper,
`middle, and lower antiserum troughs contained anti-
`sera prepared against 1 Hence Jones protein Meg
`(cmu'—}\. Meg), It Hence Jones protein Hil [mitt-7t Hil),
`and the light chains isolated from FII -_'G—globulin
`(mitt-FII Z.-chants), respectively.
`
`ted only with the intact protein and not with
`the CE component. The antiserum prepared to
`It Bence Jones protein Hil recognized both in-
`tact protein Meg and its CE, and, although not
`evident in the figure, the C E component form-
`ed a prccipitin reaction of nonidentity with
`the intact Bence Jones protein. None of 20 an-
`tisera prepared against other A Bence Jones
`proteins formed a visible precipitin reaction
`
`Imtnunodiffusion
`6.
`Fig.
`intact polypep-
`anlysis of
`tide chains and constant-
`
`of
`fragments
`half-related
`three 1+. Bence Jones proteins.
`The peripheral antigen wells
`in both patterns contained
`intact 7. Bence Jones proteins
`(1. Law, 1 Meg. and ). C113)
`and their 553C pepsin-de-
`rived
`constant-half-related
`
`fragments (CE Lev, Cf Meg,
`and CE C12). The central well
`in the pattern on the left con-
`tained an antiserum prepared
`against it Bence Jones pro-
`tein Hil
`(anti-1 Hit). The
`central well
`in the pattern
`on the right contained the
`same
`antiserum absorbed
`with intact 1 Benee Jones
`protein Lev(a:mt'-1 Ht? 2').
`
`
`
`Cp CI
`'-
`
`e
`
`_
`_
`Grill‘ is Hll
`
`"
`.
`.
`Clflll‘ A Hll A
`
`
`
`

`
`690 A. Solomon
`
`WMS
`
`ll
`
`- onti—:rJo 3
`
`- Unis -hornol. BJP
`
`- Ol'|il'lJU
`
`T
`
`l
`
`M
`
`T
`
`I
`
`In H
`
`cf a.iP
`
`c
`
`B-JP
`
`BJP
`
`cf
`
`c[
`
`a.iP V:
`
`Fig. 7. Immunoelectrophoretic analyses of intact polypeptide chains and related fragments of four Z Hence
`Jones proteins. The antigen wells under the designations ll5"M.S‘_. OAK. and EDI!” contained urine specimens
`from Patients \5C'r-ns, Oak. and Edw, respectively; the antigen wells under the designation LEN contained
`a sample of Bence Jones protein Len subjected to limited pepsin proteolysis at 37"C. Each sample was tested
`against an antiserum prepared to the homologous Bence Jones protein (ann'—lmmoI. BJP) and against an anti-
`serum prepared to ‘at Bence Jones prote_in Jo (aritiac 30}, and the anti-it Jo antiserum absorbed with a heterolo-
`gous X Benee Jones protein (anti-xjci /1). H71’ --—- Bence Jones protein; C}:
`: constant-half-related light-chain
`component found in vivo; (If and Vi:
`. constant-half— and variant-half-related light—chain components,
`respectively, produced in vitro by pepsin proteolytic cleavage of Bence Jones protein. The anode was to the
`left.
`
`formed from 5
`Mcg or with the
`with
`other A Bence Jones proteins. This lack of reac-
`
`tion was not related to the CA isotype (43). As
`in the case of protein Meg,
`the CE derived
`from other A chains was not
`recognized by
`antisera to the homologous Bence Jones pro-
`teins or by the anti—FlI
`light chains, anti-FII
`
`Fab, or anti-Iill yG-globulin antisera. Usually,
`A chains are more resistant
`than 2 chains to
`
`cleavage by endopeptidases: specific proteoly—
`sis of A chains into VI, anti CL is facilitated by
`prior reduction and alkylation of the proteins
`(20, 45). Pcpsin cleaves x chains between posi-
`tions H6 and I17 in the C domain (38). Al-
`though the specific site of .\-chain cle-.1v-age by
`pepsin is still to be established. our own studies
`and other data (21) indicate that the sequences
`of CJ’ Fragments derived from A Bence Jones
`proteins include the entire C region and also
`extend -x-4 to ID residues into the V region.
`The anti-A Bence Jones protein I-Iii antiserum
`was unique in its capability to react with C].-
`related Fragments formed by pepsin cleavage of
`A chains. A comparative immunodiffusion anal-
`ysis of three A Bence Jones proteins and their
`isolated C1; components is shown in Fig. 6.
`The C11:
`iragnieiits and Bence Jones proteins
`formed reactions of nonidentity; absorption of
`the antiserum with one of
`the intact Benee
`
`Jones proteins left precipitin reactivity with
`
`the C? components. The constant region of the
`2: light chain (Cg) contains :1
`'hidden' antigenic
`determinant that is revealed only after pepsin
`cleavage of the it chain into V” and C1_—reIated
`components or by unfolding the intact 3 chain
`with a dissociating solvent (26). The 1‘E‘.‘lCtiVi'ty
`of CE Writs, Oak, and Edw and CE Len was
`tested with an anti—;¢ Bence Jones antiserum
`(anti—;¢ Jo) that has specificity for the ‘hidden'
`CL antigenic determinant. The specificity of
`this antiserum for CF Len is evident
`in the
`immunoclcctrophoretic
`analysis
`depicted in
`Fig. 7. However, the antiserum did not distin-
`
`guish between the Bence Jones proteins and
`any of the three C: components. Absorption
`of the '.1n[iSL‘t'uI'i'1 with an intact
`.2 chain re-
`
`moved precipitin reactivity with the Cl’: com-
`ponents and the Bence Jones proteins but not
`with the CJ’ Len fragment.
`Comparaiivc immunochemical studies were
`also performed with two light chains possessing
`extensive
`internal V-region deletions
`(Table
`III). Kappaechain Sac lacks m70 amino acid
`residues, corresponding to positions 19 through
`88 in the V,_ (42), and }t—chain Sm lacks M81
`residues between positions 3] and 109 in the
`VI. (15); both proteins, however, have intact
`C regions. On the basis of reactivity with an-
`ti-;¢, anti-A. and anti-FII light—chain antisera.
`proteins Sac and Sm were readily classified
`
`

`
`Table III. Light chains with extensive V-region dele-
`tions
`
`
`Present
`Missing
`Present
`
`xSac
`1
`18 [19
`88]
`89
`214
`
`)tSm
`1-:30 [31
`109] 110
`214
`
`as x— and A-type, respectively. The prccipitin
`reactions given by these two proteins were gen-
`erally comparable to those of complete Bence
`Jones proteins; with certain antisera, however,
`the intensity of reactions was notably less, es-
`pecially those given by protein Sm. The most
`striking differences were apparent with the an-
`tiscra to FII yG-globulin and to its Fab frag-
`ment. Proteins Sac and Sm reacted weakly with
`both of these antisera and were antigenically
`deficient when compared with intact x or A
`Bence Jones proteins. Although these antisera
`distinguish between it and A chains (see Fig. 6),
`2: protein Sac and A protein Sm together formed
`a prccipitin reaction of identity. Proteins Sac
`and Sm were also tested against the anti—light-
`chain antisera that have specificity for the ‘hid-
`den’ C:-: and CA antigenic determinants. With
`the anti—x Jo antiserum,
`:4 protein Sac and a
`complete :4 chain gave a prccipitin reaction of
`identity, and both were antigenically deficient
`to a Ca fragment. However, with the anti-A
`Hil antiserum, a complete A chain was antigeni-
`cally deficient to both the A protein Sm and a
`CPR fragment, which together formed a precip-
`itin reaction of identity.
`
`reactivity of VL—r-elated components
`The
`formed by peptic digestion of x and A Bence
`Jones protein was also tested against the anti-
`sera used to study CL-related components. The
`V? fragments were recognized only by anti-
`sera to the homologous Bence jones protein and
`by certain antisera with specificity for V,_—relat-
`ed antigenic determinants,
`such as V—region
`subgroup or isotypic antigenic determinants (25,
`45).
`The effect of light-chain conformation on ex-
`pression of x and A antigenicity was investigat-
`ed through imtnunochemical comparisons of
`Bence Jones proteins exposed to chemical agents
`capable of disassociating noncovalent and cova-
`lent bonds. Bence Jones proteins were dissolved
`
`Locafi.-:ati'ort of x and "A /lrztigeatfc Deterntiraants
`
`69]
`
`
`
`Fig. 8. Immunodifiusion analysis of native, denatured,
`and renatured Bence Jones protein. The peripheral
`antigen wells contain a K Bence Jones protein in [1]
`0.02M phosphate—0.15M NaCl buffer, pH, 7.2; [2]
`6M urea-phosphate—saline buffer; [3] 0.1M 2-mercap—
`toethanol—phospl1ate-saline bufier; [4] 6M urea-0.1M
`2-Inercaptoethanol-phosphate-saline buffer; and [S]
`the urea-rnercaptoethanol-treated protein dialyzed
`against phosphate-saline buffer. The central well
`contained an antiserum prepared against the papain—
`derived Fab fragment of FII ‘(G-globulin.
`
`in a
`at a final concentration of 0.25 mg/ml
`0.02M phosphate-0.15M NaCl buffer, pH 7.2,
`and in a similar buffer containing either 6M
`urea or 0.1M 2-mercaptoethanol or a combina-
`tion of the two. No differences in prccipitin
`reactivity were evident antong urea-treated,
`mercaptoethanol—treated,
`and native
`(phos-
`phate-saline) as and A Bence Jones proteins. On
`the other hand,
`the presence of both urea
`and mercaptoethanol markedly affected light-
`chain
`antigenicity.
`Proteins
`dissolved
`in
`phosphate—saline buffer containing both 6M
`urea and 0.1M 2-mercaptoethanol
`failed to
`form visible prccipitin reactions with the anti-
`FII light chain, anti-FII Fab, and anti-FII 7G-
`globulin antisera, and reacted only weakly or
`not at all with antisera prepared against
`the
`homologous or hetcrologous Bence Jones pro-
`teins. Howcver, the loss of :-c and A antigenicity
`was reversible; dialysis of the urea— and mer-
`captoethanol-treated proteins, first against 4M
`urea, phosphate-saline buffer, pH 7.2, and then
`against
`the phosphate-saline buffer,
`restored
`prccipitin reactivity of the renatured proteins
`
`(Fig. 8).
`
`

`
`692 A. Solomon
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The reactivity of intact and incomplete Bence
`jones proteins and of naturally occurring and
`enzymatically produced Fragments of Bence
`Jones proteins, as compared by immunochemi-
`cal analyses with antisera specific for light-
`chain antigenic determinants, demonstrates the
`essentiality of the intact light polypeptide chain
`for expression of the is and A antigenic determi-
`nants. Differences in x and A antigenicity were
`most apparent with pepsin~derived CL—related
`fragments but were also evident with light
`chains Containing the entire C region but which
`lacked extensive portions of the V region.
`The ability to cleave specifically light chains
`into V1; and CL—related fragments led to stud-
`ies designed to determine whether a property
`of the intact light chain is indeed a function of
`the whole molecule or whether it is a charac-
`
`teristic of only the V or C domain (20, 45).
`For example, the idiotypic and certain isotypic
`antigenicities of an intact
`light chain are ex-
`pressed by the isolated VL, whereas other iso-
`typic and allotypic specificities structurally lo-
`cated on the VL and CL, respectively, require
`the intact polypeptide chain for their expression
`(24, 25, 46, 47). The Inv(1), (2), and (3) allo-
`typic specificities of at chains involve the ami-
`no acid residues located at positions 153 and
`191 and the C x domain (29, 50); however, the
`serologic expression of these lnv antigenicities
`is lost upon peptic cleavage of the 2.: chain into
`V1: and CE fragments (49). Despite the fact
`that CE fragments derived from Inv(1), Inv
`(1,2), and Inv(3) Bence Jones proteins contain
`virtually the entire C domain (residues 117
`through 214).
`these fragments are devoid of
`lnv activity.
`Determination of the Inv antigenicity of x
`chain Sac and the C; components indicate the
`contributory role of the Vx domain in expres-
`sion of Inv antigenicity. On an equimolar ba-
`sis, the Inv antigenicity of Inv(1,2) protein Sac
`was similar to complete Inv(1,2) x chains; the
`CE Wins and CE Oak proteins also had de-
`tectable lnv antigenicity but at a level 16- to
`32-fold less than that of the-intact Inv(3) Bence
`Jones proteins Wms and Oak (48, 49). The
`
`additional polypeptide present on the CEI com-
`ponents and 9: chain Sac also masked the ‘hid-
`den’ antigenic determinant detected on C11:
`fragments (26).
`The V domain also contributes to certain
`
`physicochemical properties that are expressed
`by the intact polypeptide chain. For example,
`the characteristic thermal properties of
`the
`light chain (33) (which are responsible for the
`classical Bence jones protein ‘heat
`test’) are
`manifested by the VL (45). Each of the proteins
`that lacked all or part of the V region (that is,
`C: fragments, C: components, 2: chain Sac,
`and A chain Sm) failed to precipitate on heat-
`ing, remaining soluble at 100°C. Comparison
`of the fluorescent and phosphorescent proper-
`ties of V,‘ and C,‘ with those of the whole pro-
`tein showed that the luminescence of VL has
`many features in common with that of the in-
`tact light chain, whereas the CI‘ and particu-
`larly the CE possess markedly different fea-
`tures (23).
`lmmunoglobulin molecules are characterized
`by a series of compact globulin domains linked
`by an extended (linear) peptide sequence (11).
`Comparative optical
`rotatory dispersion and
`circular dichroism spectral analyses of V1‘, C1,.
`and intact light chains indicate that the V and
`C domains are each folded into a compact
`structure allowing relatively little, if any.
`in-
`terdomain interaction (6, 16, 19). However. a
`potential
`for
`interdomain interaction does
`exist: our studies of the luminescent properties
`of a large number of human light chains have
`shown that the orientation of the tryptophyl
`residue(s) in the V domain can indeed influence
`the tryptophyl-disulfide linl-t interactions in the
`C domain (23). The loss of ac and A antigenicity
`of urea
`and mercaptoethanol-treated light
`chains plus the restoration of antigenicity on
`renaturation demonstrates the conformational
`
`dependency of the x and A antigenic determi-
`nants, thus providing furrher evidence of inter-
`domain interaction.
`
`X—ray diffraction data derived from crystals
`of the human A Bence Jones protein dimer Meg
`(35), the human A Fab’ fragment New (31, 32),
`and a murine x Fab fragment (36) indicate rel-
`atively few interdomain interactions as com-
`
`
`
`

`
`pared with the intradornain interactions cre-
`ated by the V—-V or C—C associations. One of
`the monomeric units (Monomer 2)
`in the A
`light-chain dimer Mcg (35) structurally shares
`features noted for other light chains (8, 31, 36).
`The closeness of the residues at positions 174
`and 82 in the C and V domains, respectively,
`in Monomer 2 (35) provides at least one site
`for potential steric interaction between light-
`chain domains. These positions are homolo-
`gous to the location of a disulfide linkage be-
`tween the C and V domains of certain rabbit 7».-
`
`light chains (1, 51). Further, the residue cor-
`responding to position 174 occupies a complete-
`ly exposed location on :4 and A human and
`murine light-chain molecules (18), and the ty-
`rosyl residue at position 173 is the most readily
`ioclinated of all the tyrosines in human .2 chains
`(39). The differences in expression of X or A
`antigenicity observed for the CE fragments, CE
`components, and light chains Sac and Sm may
`reflect the fact that all of these proteins lack
`that portion of the V region that includes posi-
`tion 82.
`
`The fact that the ‘switch’ region between V
`and C domains also contributes to the expres-
`sion of x or A antigenicity is evidenced by the
`diversity in reactivity among the C; compo-
`nents and CI‘:
`fragments. The ‘switch’ region,
`as well as other structurally defined regions
`responsible for
`isotypic and allotypic light-
`chain specificities, is on the surface of the mole-
`cule and is thus exposed to solvent
`(32, 35).
`The observed flexibility in the hinge region link-
`ing V and C domains may also permit addi-
`tional V—-C interactions (8, 31, 32, 35, 36).
`Differences in the V—C bond angles could also
`account for the marked diversity in the suscep-
`tibility of human light chains to proteolytic
`cleavage into VL and CL fragments (20, 45).
`Certain Bence Jones proteins are readily cleaved
`in their native state, whereas other proteins,
`especially A chains, are rendered more suscep-
`tible to cleavage by partial reduction and alky-
`lation (20, 45).
`The V domains and C domains of light
`chains and of heavy chains are encoded by sep-
`arate genes (17, 30). The V domain of x chains
`(Vx ) always associates with the C domain of :4
`
`Localization of at and 3-. Ann'gem'c Determfrzants
`
`693
`
`chains (Cn ) and, similarly, V1 always associ-
`ates with C1 ; hybrid molecules do not occur
`—that is, V,‘ —Cl , V3‘ —Cx . In contrast, the
`V domain of heavy chains (V1,) may associate
`with any of the C domains (Cu) from each of
`the five classes of heavy chains;
`in fact,
`the
`transition from IgM to IgG (or IgA) antibody
`synthesis reflects the substitution of Cu regions
`and the preservation of the VH region of both
`types of molecules (41, 54, 55). Structural char-
`acterization and hybridization kinetic analy-
`ses of immunoglobulin mRNA, which has been
`isolated from light-chain-synthesizing murine
`plasma cell
`tumors, show a single integrated
`mRNA molecule (22, 28). The contributory
`roles of the V domain, C domain, and the in-
`terdomain ‘switch’ region in expression of x and
`A antigenicity indicate that the x or A deter-
`minants are markers of an integrated V—C
`gene, suggesting that
`these determinants may
`serve as the recognition signal for V—C integra-
`tion. Variability in expression of the ‘kappa’ or
`the ‘lambda’ gene may account for the marked
`interspecies differences in the ratio of x to A
`light chains (17) and, additionally, account for
`alterations in the x to A ratio noted clinically
`(3, 5, 37, 57).
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`This study was supported by USPHS Research
`Grants CA 10056-11, CA 15173-02, and CA
`13237-04 from the National Cancer Institute.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Appella, E., Roholt, 0.A., Chersi, A., Radzimski,
`G. 6: Pressman, D. Amino acid sequence of the
`light chain derived from a rabbit anti-p-azoben-
`zoate antibody of restricted heterogeneity. Bia-
`chem. b:'ap}:_ys. Res. Commun. .53, 1122, 1973.
`2. Baglioni, C., Cioli, D., Gorini, G., Rutfilli, A. 6:
`Alescio-Zonta, L. Studies on fragments of light
`chains of human immunoglobulins: genetic and
`biochemical implications. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp.
`quant. Biol. 32, 147, 1967.
`8: Ober-
`3. Barandun, S., Morell, A., Skvaril, F.
`dorfet, A. Deficiency of x- or 1»-type immuno-
`globulins. Blood 47, 79, 1976.
`Immunoglobulin
`4. Berggérd,
`I.
`8: Peterson, P.
`components in normal human urine. p. 71 in
`Kiilander, J. (ed.) Gamma Globulins, Nobel Sym-
`
`
`
`

`
`694
`
`.4. Solomon
`
`posium 3. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm,
`1967.
`.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket