throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 7,397,363
`Issue Date: July 8, 2008
`Title: CONTROL AND/OR MONITORING APPARATUS AND METHOD
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01612
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Petitioner presents the following updated mandatory notices, pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3).
`
`Petitioner updates these mandatory notices to include copies of the August 18,
`
`2015, Memorandum Opinion and Order Regarding Claim Construction in Joao
`
`Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v. Protect America, Inc., Case No. 1:14-cv-
`
`134 (W.D. Tex.), attached as Exhibit 1009, and the March 23, 2016, Memorandum
`
`Opinion and Order in Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v. Telular Corp.,
`
`Case No. 1:14-cv-09852 (N.D. Ill.), attached as Exhibit 1010.
`
`Petitioner further updates these mandatory notices to identify additional
`
`administrative matters that may affect, or may be affected by, a decision in this
`
`inter partes review.
`
`
`
`I. Mandatory Notices (37 C.F.R. § 42.8)
`
`Related Matters: The following judicial matter may affect, or may be affected by, a
`
`decision in this inter partes review: Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v.
`
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al., No. 1:14-cv-517 (D. Del.), in which
`
`VWGoA and its subsidiary Bentley Motors, Inc. are defendants. Judicial matters in
`
`the following districts, against the following parties, may affect, or may be affected
`
`by, a decision in this inter partes review: in the District of Delaware, Nissan (1:14-
`
`cv-523), Mazda (1:13-cv-728), Mitsubishi (1:13-cv-00614), Jaguar Land Rover
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
`(1:13-cv-507), Verizon (1:14-cv-525), Cox (1:14-cv-520), Consolidated Edison
`
`(1:14-cv-519), Time Warner (1:14-cv-524), Cablevision (1:14-cv-518), DirecTV
`
`(1:14-cv-521), DISH (1:14-cv-522), Alarm.com (1:14-cv-284), FrontPoint Security
`
`Solutions (1:13-cv-1760), Vivint (1:13-cv-508), American Traffic Solutions (1:13-
`
`cv243), and Ford (1:12-cv-1479); in the Eastern District of Michigan, Chrysler
`
`(4:13-cv-13957) and Ford (4:13-cv-13615 and 4:12-cv-14004); in the Southern
`
`District of New York, Chrysler (1:13-cv-53), City of Yonkers (1:12-cv-7734),
`
`Digital Playground (1:12-cv-6781), Liquid Cash (1:12-cv-6315), and Cenuco
`
`(7:05-cv-01037); in the Eastern District of New York, Slomin’s (2:14-cv-2598); in
`
`the Central District of California, Ford (2:12-cv-33), Hyundai (8:12-cv-7), ACTI
`
`(8:10-cv-1909), Honda (2:12-cv-4013), Xanboo (2:12-cv-3698 and 8:11-cv-604),
`
`Smartvue (2:12-cv-3641), Digital Playground (2:12-cv-417), GSMC (2:11-cv-9636
`
`and 2:11-cv-8697), Game Link (2:11-cv-9633 and 2:11-cv-8695), Ahava (2:11-cv-
`
`9638), Webcamnow.com (2:11-cv-8257); in the Northern District of California,
`
`Sling Media (3:11-cv-6277); in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, LifeShield
`
`(2:15-cv-2772); in the Northern District of Illinois, Telular (1:14-cv-9852) (copy of
`
`March 23, 2016, Memorandum Opinion and Order attached as Exhibit 1010); in
`
`the District of Arizona, Mobile Integrated Solutions (2:14-cv-2643); in the
`
`Northern District of Georgia, Comverge (1:14-cv-3862); in the Western District of
`
`North Carolina, CPI Security Systems (3:14-cv-202) and Lowe (5:13-cv-56); in the
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`Western District of Texas, Protect America (1:14-cv-134) (copy of August 18,
`
`2015, Memorandum Opinion and Order Regarding Claim Construction attached as
`
`Exhibit 1009); and in the Eastern District of Texas, Playboy (6:09-cv-499). The
`
`following administrative matters may affect, or may be affected by, a decision in
`
`this inter partes review: U.S. Pat. App. Ser. Nos.: 08/622,749; 08/883,467;
`
`10/420,795; 10/781,751; 11/180,822; 12/150,363; 60/187,735; 60/190,379; U.S.
`
`Pat. Nos. 5,917,405; 6,549,130; 6,542,076; 6,542,077; 7,277,010; and 6,587,046;
`
`Reexamination Control Nos. 90/013,300; 90/013,301; 90/013,302; and 90/013,303;
`
`and Inter Partes Review Nos. IPR2015-01466, -01477, -01478, -01482, -01484, -
`
`01485, -01486, -01508, -01509, -01585, -01610, -01611, -01613, -01645, -01760, -
`
`01762, and -01765.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 20, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. Lennon (Reg. No. 26,562) Lead Counsel
`Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194) Backup Counsel
`Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Clifford A. Ulrich/
`
` Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194)
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` The foregoing Petitioner Updated Mandatory Notices was served on May 20,
`
`2016, via email upon the following:
`
`Raymond A. Joao, Reg. No. 35,907
`rayjoao@optonline.net
`René A. Vasquez, Reg. No. 38,647
`rvasquez@sinergialaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. Lennon (Reg. No. 26,562) Lead Counsel
`Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194) Backup Counsel
`Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`Tel:
`
`212.425.7200
`Fax:
`
`212.425.5288
`Email: mlennon@kenyon.com
`culrich@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`
`/Clifford A. Ulrich/
`
` Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket