throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 6,542,076
`Issue Date: April 1, 2003
`Title: CONTROL, MONITORING AND/OR
`SECURITY APPARATUS AND METHOD
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01610
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Petitioner presents the following updated mandatory notices, pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3).
`
`
`
` Petitioner updates these mandatory notices to include a copy of the June 10,
`
`2016, Opinion and Order (1) Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant FCA
`
`US LLC’S Motion for Summary Judgment on Invalidity and Noninfringement
`
`(Dkt. 59) and (2) Denying as Moot Plaintiff Joao Control & Monitoring Systems,
`
`LLC’S Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,397,363 by UConnect Access (Dkt. 57) in Joao Control & Monitoring Systems,
`
`LLC v. Chrysler Group LLC, Case No. 4:13-cv-13957, attached as Exhibit 1027.
`
`
`
`I. Mandatory Notices (37 C.F.R. § 42.8)
`
`Related Matters: The following judicial matter may affect, or may be affected by, a
`
`decision in this inter partes review: Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v.
`
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al., No. 1:14-cv-517 (D. Del.), in which
`
`VWGoA and its subsidiary Bentley Motors, Inc. are defendants. Judicial matters in
`
`the following districts, against the following parties, may affect, or may be affected
`
`by, a decision in this inter partes review: in the District of Delaware, Nissan (1:14-
`
`cv-523), Mazda (1:13-cv-728), Mitsubishi (1:13-cv-00614), Jaguar Land Rover
`
`(1:13-cv-507), Verizon (1:14-cv-525), Cox (1:14-cv-520), Consolidated Edison
`
`(1:14-cv-519), Time Warner Cable (1:14-cv-524), Cablevision (1:14-cv-518),
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
`DirecTV
`
`(1:14-cv-521), DISH
`
`(1:14-cv-522), Alarm.com
`
`(1:14-cv-284),
`
`FrontPoint Security Solutions (1:13-cv-1760), Vivint (1:13-cv-508), American
`
`Traffic Solutions (1:13-cv-243), and Ford (1:12-cv-1479); in the Eastern District of
`
`Michigan, Chrysler (4:13-cv-13957) (copy of June 10, 2016, Opinion and Order
`
`(1) Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant FCA US LLC’S Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment on Invalidity and Noninfringement (Dkt. 59) and (2) Denying
`
`as Moot Plaintiff Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC’S Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,397,363 by UConnect
`
`Access (Dkt. 57) as Exhibit 1027), and Ford (4:13-cv-13615 and 4:12-cv-14004);
`
`in the Southern District of New York, Chrysler (1:13-cv-53), City of Yonkers
`
`(1:12-cv-7734), Digital Playground (1:12-cv-6781), Liquid Cash (1:12-cv-6315),
`
`and Cenuco (7:05-cv-01037); in the Eastern District of New York, Slomin’s (2:14-
`
`cv-2598); in the Central District of California, Ford (2:12-cv-33), Hyundai (8:12-
`
`cv-7), ACTI (8:10-cv-1909), Honda (2:12-cv-4013), Xanboo (2:12-cv-3698 and
`
`8:11-cv-604), Smartvue (2:12-cv-3641), Digital Playground (2:12-cv-417), GSMC
`
`(2:11-cv-9636 and 2:11-cv-8697), Game Link (2:11-cv-9633 and 2:11-cv-8695),
`
`Ahava (2:11-cv-9638), and Webcamnow.com (2:11-cv-8257); in the Northern
`
`District of California, Sling Media (3:11-cv-6277); in the Eastern District of
`
`Pennsylvania, LifeShield (2:15-cv-2772); in the Northern District of Illinois,
`
`Telular Corp. (1:14-cv-9852) (copy of March 23, 2016, Memorandum Opinion and
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`Order as Exhibit 1026); in the District of Arizona, Mobile Integrated Solutions,
`
`LLC (2:14-cv-2643); in the Northern District of Georgia, Comverge (1:14-cv-
`
`3862); in the Western District of North Carolina, CPI Security Systems (3:14-cv-
`
`202) and Lowe’s (5:13-cv-56); in the Western District of Texas, Protect America
`
`(1:14-cv-134) (copy of August 18, 2015, Memorandum Opinion and Order
`
`Regarding Claim Construction as Exhibit 1025); and in the Eastern District of
`
`Texas, Playboy (6:09-cv-499).
`
`
`
` The following administrative matters may affect, or may be affected by, a
`
`decision in this inter partes review: U.S. Pat. App. Ser. Nos.: 08/883,467;
`
`10/781,751; 11/180,822; and 12/150,363; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,917,405; 6,549,130;
`
`6,542,077; 7,397,363; 7,277,010; and 6,587,046; Reexamination Control Nos.
`
`90/013,300; 90/013,301; 90/013,302; and 90/013,303; and Inter Partes Review
`
`Nos. IPR2015 01466, -01477, -01478, -01482, -01484, -01485, -01486, -01508, -
`
`01509, -01585, -01611, -01612, -01613, -01645, -01760, -01762, and -01765.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 30, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. Lennon (Reg. No. 26,562) Lead Counsel
`Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194) Backup Counsel
`Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Clifford A. Ulrich/
`
` Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194)
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` The foregoing Petitioner Updated Mandatory Notices was served on June
`
`30, 2016, via email upon the following:
`
`Raymond A. Joao, Reg. No. 35,907
`rayjoao@optonline.net
`René A. Vasquez, Reg. No. 38,647
`rvasquez@sinergialaw.com
`
`
`
`Michael J. Lennon (Reg. No. 26,562) Lead Counsel
`Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194) Backup Counsel
`Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`Tel:
`
`212.425.7200
`Fax:
`
`212.425.5288
`Email: mlennon@kenyon.com
`culrich@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Clifford A. Ulrich/
`
` Clifford A. Ulrich (Reg. No. 42,194)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket