throbber
US007309602B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`David
`
`(10,) Patent N0.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 7,309,602 B2
`*Dec. 18, 2007
`
`(54)
`
`(75)
`
`COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR
`PRODUCING FERMENTATION PRODUCTS
`AND RESIDUALS
`
`Inventor: Peter R. David, Palo Alto, CA (US)
`
`(73)
`
`Assigncc: Ambrolea, Inc.. Palo Alto, CA (US)
`
`(*5)
`
`Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. l54(b) by 0 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21)
`
`Appl. No.: 11/383,748
`
`4/2005 Thompson et al.
`6,878,860 B1
`2/2006 Stewart
`7,001,610 B2
`10/2002 Walker et al.
`2002/0155192 A1
`3/2003 Jocobson et al.
`2003/0049241 A1
`6/2003 Verser et al.
`2003/0104587 A1
`8/2003 Cordero Otero e a],
`2003/0157675 A1
`2004/0248280 A1 * 12/2004 Bolla et al.
`............ .. 435/254.2
`2006/0008546 A1
`1/2006 de Souza et al.
`2006/0039955 A1
`2/2006 Messinan et al.
`2006/0057251 A1
`3/2006 1)awley et a1.
`2006/0286645 A1
`12/2006 11 et al.
`2007/0037267 A1 *
`2/2007 Lewis et al.
`.............. .. 435/161
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0450430 A2
`10/1991
`0450430 A3
`10/1991
`W0 2002/03812 A2
`1/2002
`W0 2002/03812 A3
`1/2002
`V\’O 2005/118795 A2
`12/2005
`V\’O 2005/118795 A3
`12/2005
`
`EP
`EP
`W0
`W0
`VVO
`VVO
`
`OTI IER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Parekh et a1.. Pilot-scale production of bumnol by Clostridium
`beijerinckii BAl0l using low-cost fermentation medium based on
`com steep water, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999 512152-l57.*
`Romanos et al., Yeast vol. 8, Issue 6. pp. 423-488. 1992.*
`Zeikus J.G. Chemical and fuel production by anaerobic bacteria.
`Annu Rev Microbiol. 1980;34:423-64.*
`Birkelo, et al. The energy content of wet corn distillers grains for
`lactating dairy cows. .1 Dairy Sci. 2004; 87(6): 1815-9.
`Casey, et al. High Gravity Brewing" Effects of Nutrition on Yeast
`Compostition, Fcrmcntativc Ability, and Alcohol Production Appl
`Environ Microbiol. 1984: 48(3):639-646.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Joseph Woitach
`Primary Examiner
`,4ssistar2t F_mminer—Maria 1.eavit
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
`Rosati
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`4,567,145 A
`4,828,846 A
`5,145,695 A
`5,151,354 A *
`5,219,596 A
`5,480,805 A
`5,530,188 A
`5,656,319 A
`5,656,472 A
`5,766,925 A
`6,410,755 B1
`6,538,182 B1
`6,774,284 B1
`6,849,782 B2
`6,855,529 B2
`6,867,237 B1
`
`............. .. 426/11
`
`1/1986 Faber et al.
`5/1989 Rasco et al.
`9/1992 Smith et al.
`9/1992 Strasser et al.
`6/1993 Smith et al.
`1/1996 Wolf et :11.
`6/1996 Ausich et :11.
`8/1997 Barclay
`8/1997 Ausich et al.
`6/1998 Sugirnoto ct al.
`6/2002 Millis et al.
`3/2003 Thompson et 211.
`8/2004 Thompson et 211.
`2/2005 Thompson et al.
`2/2005 Thompson et a1.
`3/2005 Taylor et a1.
`
`The present invention provides compositions and methods
`designed to increase value output of 21 fermentation reaction,
`111 particular,
`the present
`invention provides a business
`method of increasing value output of a fermentation plant.
`The present invention also provides an modified fermentation
`residual of higher commercial value. Also provided in the
`present invention are complete animal feeds, nutritional
`supplements comprising the subject ferment residuals. Fur-
`ther provided by the present
`invention is a method of
`performing fermentation, a modified fermentative 1nicroor-
`ganism and a genetic vehicle for modifying such microo-
`ganism.
`
`24 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`May 16, 2006
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2007/0243592 A1
`
`Oct. 18, 2007
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`Provisional application No. 60/797,431, filed on May
`3, 2006, provisional application No. 60/744,833, filed
`on Apr. 13, 2006.
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`CI2N 1/19
`(2006.01)
`A23B 7/10
`(2006.01)
`/1233 7/154
`(2006.01)
`CI2P 7/06
`U.S. Cl.
`................. .. 435/254.2; 435/161; 435/256;
`426/53; 426/56
`Field of Classification Search ................... .. None
`See application file for complete search history.
`References Cited
`
`(65)
`
`(60)
`
`(51)
`
`(52)
`
`(58)
`
`(56)
`
`(cid:0)H(cid:0)Y(cid:0)D(cid:0)R(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0)E(cid:0) (cid:0)E(cid:0)X(cid:0)H(cid:0)I(cid:0)B(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0) (cid:0)1(cid:0)0(cid:0)1(cid:0)3
`

`
`US 7,309,602 B2
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Coon, C The present and future utilization of biotechnology in the
`feed industry. a poultry nutritionist’s perspective. University Of
`Arkansas. Available at http://www.asa-europe.orgpdf’present.pdf.
`Accessed Oct. 16, 2006.
`Feed-Use Amino Acids Business. Ajinornoto Co., Inc. Oct. 2006. 6
`pages.
`Gasent-Ramirez, et al. Lysine-overproducing mutants of San-
`charonzy/ces cerevisiae baker’s yeast isolated in continous culture.
`Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63(12):4800-6.
`Hao. C. T. J. Yeast dilution. Bachelor of engineering thesis pre-
`sented at The University of Queensland on May 19. 2004. 39 pages.
`Ingledew. W. M. Yeast—could you base business 011 this bug? In
`T.P.
`Lyons
`and
`K.A.
`Jacques,
`editors.
`Under
`the
`miccroscope—l-'ocal Points for the New Millennium-Biotechnology
`in the Feed Industry. Proceedings of Al1tech’s 15th Annual Sy1n-
`posiurn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK. 1999. pp.
`27-47.
`technology through
`Lngledew. V\’. M. Improvements in alcohol
`advancements in fermentation technology. Getreidetechnologie
`(Getreidetechnologie).2005; 59(5):308-311.
`Larkins. B. A. Boosting lysine improves nutritional value of corn.
`US Department of Agriculture. Cooperative State Research. Edu-
`cation, and Extension Service. 2001 No. 4. 2 pages.
`Lyons, et al. (Ed) Biotechnology in the Feed Lndustry. Proceedings
`o1‘Alltech’s 10”‘ Annual Symposium. Nottingham University Press.
`I oughtorough, Leicestershire, UK. 1994. (Table of Contents only).
`Mason, S. Rumen-protected amino acids. Available at http://www.
`westerndairyscienee conflhtml/CALRT%20articles/html/Aa1 .html.
`Accessed Oct. 11, 2006.
`Meyers. et al. trans-Recessive mutation in the first structural gene of
`histidine operon that results in a constitutive expression of the
`operon. J. Bacteriology 1975. 124 (3) 1227-1235.
`Moller, K. Glucose metabolism in the petite-negative yeast Sac-
`charomyces kluyveri. Ph. D. thesis presented technical University
`of Denmark. 2001. 132 pages.
`Nagai, et al. Transcriptional regulation of the heat shock regulatory
`gene rpoH in Escherichia Cali: involvement of a novel catabolite-
`sensitive promoter J. Bacteriol. 1990; 172(_5):2710-2715.
`National Renewable Energy Laboratory. The DOE bioethanol pilot
`plant—A tool for commercialization. DOE/GO-102000-1114. Sep.
`2000. 4 pages.
`Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. '/"h Revised Edition. National
`Academy Press. Washington, D. C. 1996 (Table of Contents only).
`2 pages.
`Nutritional Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7”‘ Revised bdition.
`National Acedemy Press. Washington, DC. 2001. (Table of Con-
`tents only). 2 pages.
`Nutritional Requirements of Swine. 10th Revised Edition. National
`Academy Press. Washington, D.C. 1998 (Table of Contents only).
`9 pages.
`O’Connor-Cox, et al. Wort nitrogenous sources—Their use by
`brewing yeasts: Areview. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 1989, 120-108.
`Potera, C. Progress with biofuels will depend on. d.rive nricrobology
`resea.rch—As interest in biofuels surges. finding co st—e1Tective ways
`to converting biomass to fuels and feedstocks poses challenges to
`microbiologists. Vlicrobe. 2006;
`l(7):317-322.
`Program and Abstracts. 27”“ Symposium on Biotechnology for fuels
`and chemicals hosted by the National Renewable Energy Labora-
`tory in Denver Marriott City Center Hotel. Denver, Colorado May
`1-4. 2005.
`
`In Riso
`
`Sambrook. et al. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold
`Spring IIarbor Labs Press. Planview. NY. 1989. Table of Contents
`only. 30 pages.
`Shimazu, et al. A Family of Basic Amino Acid Transporters of the
`Vacuolar Membrane from Saccharomyces' cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.
`2005; 280(_6)4851—4857.
`Shurson, et al. Corn By-Product Diversity and Feeding Value to
`Non-Ruminants. Minnesota Nutrition Conference Proceedings.
`2005; 19 pages.
`Shurson, et al. Nutritional and value added benefits of maize DDGS
`and other dry-mill co-products to swine. University of Minnesota.
`Eastern Nutrition Conf., Ottawa. Ontario, Canada. May 10-11.
`2004. 20 pages.
`Soto, et al. Estimation of ethanol yield in corn mash fermentations
`using mass of ash as a marker. Journal of the Institute of Brewing,
`2005; 111(2):137—143.
`Thomas, et al. Fllecls of particulate materials and osmoprotectants
`on very-high-gravity ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces
`cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994; 60(5):1519-24
`Thomas, et al. Fuel alcohol production: effects of free amino
`nitrogen on ferementation on very-high-gravity wheat mashes. Appl
`Environ Microbiol. 1990;56(7):2046-50.
`Thomas, et al. Production of fuel alcohol from hull-less barley by
`very high gravity technology. Cereal Chemistry. 1995; 72(4):360-
`364.
`'1'homsen, et al. Biotechnology in ethanol production.
`Energy Report 2. 2003; 40-44.
`Widyaratne, G. P. Characterization and improvement of the nutri-
`tional value of ethanol by-products for swine. Master of science
`degree thesis presented at University of Saskatchenwan. Dec. 2005.
`140 pages.
`the
`al. Heterologous protein expression ir1
`et
`Cereghino.
`methylotropic yeast Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiology Reviews.
`2000; 24:45-66.
`Dansen, et al. Regulation of sterol carrier protein gene expression by
`the horkhead transcription factor FOXO3a. J. Lipid Research. 2004;
`45:81-88.
`He, et al. Overexpression of a sterol C-240.8) reductase increases
`ergosterol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biotechnology
`Letters. 2003; 25(10):773-8.
`Kim. et al. A role in Vacuolar arginine transport for yeast Btnlp and
`for htunan CLN3, the protein defective ir1 Batten disease. PNAS.
`2003; 100:15458-15462.
`Rippert, et al. Engineering Plant Shikinrate Pathway for Production
`of'1'ocotrienol and Improving Herbicide Resistance. Plant Physiol.
`2004; 134292-100.
`Stepanova, et al. Lysine Overproduction Mutations in the Yeast
`Sacz*}z(1rorriyces cerevisiae Are Introduced into Industrial Yeast
`Strains. Russian J. Genetics. 2001; 37:460-463.
`Sychrova, et al. Kinetic properties of yeast lysine permeases coded
`by genes on multi-copy vectors. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;
`113(1):57-61.
`Szczebara, et al. Total biosynthesis of hydrocortisone from a simple
`carbon source in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(_2):143-9.
`Misawa, et al. Production of [5-carotene in Aymomonas mobilis and
`Agrobacterium tumefaciens by intoduction of the biosynthesis
`genes
`from Erwinia uredovora. Applied and Environmental
`Microbiology. 1991; 57(6): 1847-9.
`Foreign Search Report of Jul 2. 2007 Reguarding Application No.
`GB07067788.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`(cid:0)H(cid:0)Y(cid:0)D(cid:0)R(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0)E(cid:0) (cid:0)E(cid:0)X(cid:0)H(cid:0)I(cid:0)B(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0) (cid:0)1(cid:0)0(cid:0)1(cid:0)3
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 18,2007
`
`Sheet 1 of2
`
`Us 7,309,602 B2
`
`Biofuelsz Ethanol
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 1
`
`
`
`_Saccharification
`
`
`Distillation
`I Centrifugation
`
`(cid:0)H(cid:0)Y(cid:0)D(cid:0)R(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0)E(cid:0) (cid:0)E(cid:0)X(cid:0)H(cid:0)I(cid:0)B(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0) (cid:0)1(cid:0)0(cid:0)1(cid:0)3
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 18,2007
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`Us 7,309,602 B2
`
`Vector for expressing exogenous sequence in yeast
`
`replication
`
`Pl’0m0teT
`
`origin
`
`regulatory
`sequence
`
`multiple cloning
`site
`
`
`
`’
`selection
`marker
`
`EXOQEFIOLIS
`sequence
`
`terminator
`
`multiple cloning
`site
`
`Exemplary Selection Marker: Zeocin
`
`Exemplary Regulatory Sequence:
`
`Glucose suppressor operon
`Regulatory sequence of a heat shock gene
`Regulatory sequence of a toxicity gene
`Regulatory sequence of a spore formation gene
`
`Figure 2
`
`(cid:0)H(cid:0)Y(cid:0)D(cid:0)R(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0)E(cid:0) (cid:0)E(cid:0)X(cid:0)H(cid:0)I(cid:0)B(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0) (cid:0)1(cid:0)0(cid:0)1(cid:0)3
`

`
`US 7,309,602 B2
`
`1
`CONIPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR
`PRODUCING FERl\/IENTATION PRODUCTS
`AND RESIDUALS
`
`CROSS REFERENCE
`
`This application claims the benefit of US. Provisional
`Application No. 60/744,833 filed Apr. 13, 2006, U.S. Pro-
`visional Application No. 60/797,431 filed May 3, 2006, all
`of which are incorporated herein by reference in their
`entirety.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`industry is growing at a rapid pace.
`The ethanol fuel
`Numerous federal and state incentives, such as clean burn-
`i11g fuel programs, have fostered the exponential growth of
`n1ore than five times over the past two decades. In 2004,
`high oil prices, a bumper corn crop, and limited processing
`capacity created new market opportunities and resulted in
`record production of more than 3.4 billion gallons of fuel
`ethanol. Today, ethanol represents the third largest market
`for US. corn. At
`this pace,
`fuel ethanol production is
`positioning itself as an integral part of rural economic
`development and environmental improvement.
`Ethanol can be made through fermentation and distillation
`of starch found in crops such as con1, sorgl1un1, potatoes,
`sugar cane, as well as in cornstalks. Ethanol
`is usually
`produced in either dry grind or wet mill facilities. The
`primary co-products generated from the wet mills or “corn
`refineries” include high fructose corn syrup. corn oil, gluten
`feed, and gluten meal. Co—products from the dry grind
`process include distillers grains and carbon dioxide. While
`both types of facilities have similar operating costs, the dry
`grind facilities are usually smaller and require a lower initial
`investment, making their capital costs two to four times less
`per gallon. The dry mill types of ethanol production process
`the starch portion of corn, which is about 60% of the kernel.
`All
`the remaining nutrients—protein,
`fat, minerals, and
`vitamins—are concentrated into distillers grain which is a
`valuable feed for livestock. A bushel ofcorn weighing nearly
`56 pounds may produce approximately 2.8 gallons of etha-
`nol and 18 pounds of distillers grain.
`Distillers grain ca11 provide a high quality feedstuff ration
`for dairy cattle, beef cattle, swine, poultry, pets, a11d aquac-
`ulture. The feed is an economical partial replacement for
`corn, soybean meal, and dicalcium phosphate in livestock
`a11d poultry feeds. Distillers grain continues to be an excel-
`lent, economical feed ingredient for use in ruminant diets.
`DDGS (distillers dried grains with solubles) production has
`been expected to double from 3.5 million metric tons in
`2002 to over 7 million metric tons by 2006. The sale of
`distillers grain is an important part of the total profitability
`a11d growth of the ethanol industry. If dried distillers grain
`sales lag behind the increasing production of ethanol, the
`current ethanol industry could be significantly affected. An
`eifective marketing of distillers grain as animal feed will
`undoubtedly contribute to the efficiency and overall profit-
`ability of am ethanol facility.
`Current ethzmol production schemes by fermentation are
`far from being optimized. While eiforts have been directed
`to improve ethanol production,
`little research has been
`focused on enhancing the value output of the fermentation
`residuals including the distillers grai11 that contributes to a
`significant portion of the animal feed market.
`Thus, there remains a considerable need for compositions
`and methods that are designed to increase the value output
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`of a fermentation facility. An ideal fermentation scheme
`would maintain the high ethanol production, and at the same
`time yield fermentation residuals of higher commercial
`value. The present invention satisfies this need and provides
`related advantages as well.
`SUMMARY OF IH A INVWNTION
`
`The present invention provides compositions and meth-
`ods designed to increase value output of a fermentation
`reaction. In one embodiment, the present invention provides
`a business method of increasing value output of a ferrner1—
`tation plant. The method comprises the steps of (a) perform-
`ing a fermentation reaction with the use of a modified
`microorganism; and (b) marketing or selling one or r11ore of
`the products of the fermentation reaction comprising said
`modified microorganism.
`In a related embodiment,
`the
`method of increasing value output of a fermentation plant
`comprises perfonning a fermentation reaction using carbon-
`containing material in the presence of a modified microor-
`ganism to yield fermentation residual
`that has a higher
`commercial value than if the femientation reaction were
`performed in the absence of the modified microorganism. In
`one aspect,
`the fermentation reaction car1 be performed
`under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. The fennen-
`tation reaction typically produces products such as alcohol,
`including but not limited to methanol, ethanol, propanol, and
`butanol, as well as gaseous co-products such as carbon
`dioxide. In addition, the fermentation reaction also yields
`residuals that are of higher commercial value than conver1—
`tional fermentation residuals. In another aspect, the fennen-
`tation reaction may utilize any carbon-containing starting
`material, eg, carbohydrates that are present
`in a wide
`variety of substances, including but not limited to cellulose,
`wood chips, vegetables, biomass, excreta, animal wastes,
`oat, wheat, com, barley, milo, millet, rice, rye, sorghum,
`potato, sugar beets, taro, cassaya, fruits, fruit juices, and
`sugar cane. The modified microorganism employed iii the
`subject methods can be eukaryotic (e.g., yeast) or prokary—
`otic (e.g., bacteria or archaebacteria). In a preferred embodi-
`ment, the fermentation reaction yields fermentation residu-
`als that have an enhanced nutritional content. In one aspect
`of this embodiment, the femientation residuals are enriched
`in one or more types of cofactors, hormones, proteins,
`preservatives, stabilization agents, nutraceuticals, vitamins,
`essential amino acids, a11d/or lipids. In so111e aspects, the
`reaction is performed with the subject microorganisms to
`increase the value output of the entire fermentation reaction
`by enhancing the process to yield more valuable products
`and/or fermentation residuals. In some other aspects, the
`reaction is performed with the subject microorganisms to
`increase the value output without substantially decreasing
`the amount of fermentation products produced by the fer-
`mentation reaction, and/or without substantially decreasing
`the total values of fermentation products produced by the
`fermentation reaction.
`The present
`invention also provides a fermentation
`residual comprising a genetically modified microorganism,
`wherein the fermentation residual has a commercial value
`(eg. due to increase in nutritional content) higher than that
`of a fermentation residual that is deficient in said modified
`microorganism.
`In one aspect,
`the subject fermentation
`residual has a shelf life that
`is longer than that of a
`fermentation residual
`that
`is deficient
`in said modified
`microorganism. In another aspect, the residual is enriched in
`at least one essential amino acid, a significant faction of
`which (e.g. the majority of which) is encapsulated in a cell
`
`(cid:0)H(cid:0)Y(cid:0)D(cid:0)R(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0)E(cid:0) (cid:0)E(cid:0)X(cid:0)H(cid:0)I(cid:0)B(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0) (cid:0)1(cid:0)0(cid:0)1(cid:0)3
`

`
`US 7,309,602 B2
`
`3
`eg, a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell used in the fermenta-
`tion reaction). Where desired, at least about 25%, or pref-
`erably 50%, preferably at least about 60%. or even more
`wreferably at least about 80% of the essential amino acids
`measured by dry weight are encapsulated in a cell or spore.
`In addition, the essential amino acids may be embodied in a
`iomologous polypeptide with enhanced concentration, or a
`ieterologous polypeptide produced by a microorganism
`used in the fermentation reaction. The heterologous
`mlypeptide car1 be secretory or preferably non—secretory
`e.g., in a vacuole when the polypeptide is in an inclusion
`aody within the fermentation microorganism). The heterolo-
`gous polypeptide enriched ir1 essential amino acid sequences
`can adopt a variety of structural conformations such as a
`aeta-sheet conformation, an alpha-helix conformation, a
`random—coil conformation, and/or a coiled—coil conforma-
`tion, or an aggregate, or a combination thereof.
`Depending on the intended use, the essential amino acid
`may exclude histidi r1e and include any one of the exemplary
`essential amino acids. Non-limiting exemplary essential
`amino acids include lysi11e, methionine, threonine. methion-
`ine, phenylalanine, and arginine. The quantity of essential
`amino acid present in the residuals may vary fron1 at least
`about 0.25%, 1%, at least about 2%. at least about 3% to
`about 95% by dry weight.
`The subject fermentation residuals can be supplemented
`with a desirable flavor tailored for one or more types of
`animals. The residuals can also be packaged With instruc-
`tions for use as animal feed or food supplement for lnunans.
`The present invention further provides a modified micro-
`organism Whose nutritional content increases by a greater
`extent than that of an unmodified corresponding microor-
`ganism when used in a fermentation reaction.
`I11 some
`instances,
`if the nutritional cor1ter1t
`increases due to ar1
`increase i11 at least one essential amino acid, then the at least
`one essential amino acid is not histidine. In a related but
`separate embodiment, the present invention also provides a
`modified microorganism whose nutritional
`content
`is
`enhanced as compared to an unmodified corresponding
`microorganism when used in a fermentation reaction and
`when the fermentation reaction has achieved at least about
`50% completion. In another embodiment. the present inven-
`tion provides a modified microorganism producing an alco-
`hol product in a fermentation reaction that utilizes a carbon-
`containing starting material, wherein said microorganism
`also produces a nutrient subsequent to the initiation of the
`alcohol production
`In another embodiment, the present invention provides a
`modified microorganism that comprises
`an exogenous
`sequence encoding a polypeptide, wherein the polypeptide
`comprises at least one essential amino acid, and wherein
`expression of the exogenous sequence is induced when the
`fermentation reaction has achieved at
`least about 50%
`completion. In yet another embodiment, the present inven-
`tion provides a modified microorganism comprising an
`exogenous sequence encoding a polypeptide that comprises
`at least one essential amino acid, and wherein expression of
`the exogenous sequence is under the control of a glucose
`suppressor operon.
`The progression of fermentation can be monitored by a
`variety of ways. For example, at least 50% completion of a
`fermentation reaction can be evidenced by the consumption
`of at least 50% of the total glucose in the desired fermen-
`tation, when compared to similar fermentations, or when
`50% of the total glucose has been added, or when the total
`amotmt of carbon dioxide emitted, and dissolved is 50% of
`the total amount emitted in similar fermentations. More
`
`l0
`
`I5
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`least 50% completion of a fermentation
`specifically, at
`reaction can be evidenced by a decrease in glucose content
`to less than about 50% of the initial content of glucose
`present in a fermentation reaction mixture (i.e., the glucose
`level present prior to the beginning of the fermentation
`reaction), or less than a desired threshold level (e.g., about
`100 grams per liter fermentation reaction). Alternatively, the
`degree of completion can be determined by the amount of
`time during which the fermentation has taken place, typi-
`cally, at least about halfthe time taken by a similar ferrner1—
`tation. The duration of fermentation time may range from
`about 1 hour to several days, depending on the relevant
`amounts of microorganisms and fermentation starting n1ate—
`rial provided. One skilled in the art can readily ascertain the
`normal duration of a fermentation reaction without undue
`experimentation when given the amount of microorganisms
`and starting materials.
`The modified microorganism can be a eukaryote (e.g.,
`yeast) or a prokaryote (e.g., bacteria or archaebateria). It can
`be modified to overproduce a nutritional component includ-
`ing but not limited to amino acid, vitamin. and/or lipid. This
`is typically achieved by genetically modifying the metabolic
`pathway of the microorganism for producing such nutri-
`tional component, and/or directly introducing a11 exogenous
`sequence that encodes the nutritional component (e.g,, a
`particular type of amino acid contained in a polypeptide).
`Where desired, genetic modification can be carried out with
`the use of genetic Vehicles that carry one or more of the
`metabolic pathway gene sequences, or the sequences that
`code for the exogenous polypeptides carrying the nutritional
`component such as essential amino acids. A Wide variety of
`genetic vehicles are applicable for such use. They include an
`array of expression vectors including both viral and non-
`viral vectors. Ir1 a preferred embodiment, expression of the
`exogenous sequence is under the control of a regulatory
`sequence selected from the group consisting of a regulatory
`sequence of a heat shock gene, regulatory sequence of a
`oxicity gene, regulatory sequence of a spore fonnation
`gene, and glucose suppressor operon. When regulated under
`hese sequences, the increase in production of the nutritional
`component by the microorganisms can be induced at a time
`when the fermentation has substantially been completed,
`oreferably at least about 50% completed, n1ore preferably at
`east about 70% completed, more preferably about 90%
`completed. Such regulation allows production of fermenta-
`ion products of enhanced nutritional value and maximizing
`he profit from the fermentation reaction.
`The present invention further provides a method of fer-
`mentation using carbon-containing material. The method
`ypically comprises the steps of (a) mixing a carbon-con-
`aining material with a modified microorganism of the
`oresent invention, ar1d (b) subjecting the mixture of (a) to
`conditions suitable for production of a fermentation product.
`Where desired, the method can further comprise the step of
`iarvesling one or more fermentation products. Exemplary
`ermentation products include alcohol such as methanol,
`ethanol, propanol, butanol and the like, as well as gaseous
`oroducts such as carbon dioxide. The fermentation method
`can be performed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. A
`wide variety of carbon-containing raw materials can be used
`ir1 the fermentation reaction Exemplary materials include
`jut are not limited to cellulose, oat, wheat, corn, milo, millet,
`aarley, rice, rye, sorghum, potato, sugar beets, taro, cassaya,
`ruils, fruit juices, and sugar cane,
`Further embodied in the present invention is an expres-
`sion vector suitable for modifying the subject microorgan-
`ism. The expression vector typically comprises an exog-
`
`(cid:0)H(cid:0)Y(cid:0)D(cid:0)R(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0)E(cid:0) (cid:0)E(cid:0)X(cid:0)H(cid:0)I(cid:0)B(cid:0)I(cid:0)T(cid:0) (cid:0)1(cid:0)0(cid:0)1(cid:0)3
`

`
`US 7,309,602 B2
`
`5
`enous sequence encoding a polypeptide that comprises at
`least one essential amino acid, wherein expression of the
`exogenous sequence is induced when the fermentation reac-
`tion has achieved at least about 50% completion. Where
`desired, the expression vector comprises one or more of the
`following regulatory sequences so as to control the expres-
`sion of the exogenous polypeptide. F.xemplary regulatory
`sequences include glucose suppressor operon, a regulatory
`sequence of a heat shock ge11e, regulatory sequence of a
`toxicity gene, or regulatory sequence of a spore formation
`gene.
`The present invention also embodies variations and all
`combination of the composition and methods described
`herein.
`
`INCORPORATION BY R A F A RENCE
`
`All publications and patent applications mentioned in this
`specification are herein incorporated by reference to the
`same extent as if each individual publication or patent
`application was specifically and individually indicated to be
`incorporated by reference.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`specification
`included within this
`illustrations
`The
`describe many of the advantages and features of the inven-
`tion. It shall be understood that similar reference numerals
`and characters noted within the illustrations herein may
`designate the same or like features of the invention. The
`illustrations and features depicted herein are not necessarily
`drawn to scale.
`FIG. 1 is a flow chart describing an exemplary ethanol
`production process that results in formation of ethanol,
`carbon dioxide, and fem1er1tatio11 residuals such as distillers
`dried grain with solubles or solids (DDGS).
`FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of an exemplary
`genetic vehicle useful for modifying a microorganism used
`i11 the subject fermentation reaction.
`T)F.TAII.F.T) DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`VVhile preferred embodiments of the invention have been
`shown and described herein,
`it will be obvious to those
`skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way
`of example only. Numerous variations, changes. and stIbsti—
`tutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without
`departing from the invention. It should be understood that
`various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention
`described herein may be employed in practicing the inven-
`tion.
`The term “animal” means any organism belonging to the
`kingdom Animalia and includes, without limitation, poultry,
`cattle, swine, goat, sheep, cat, dog, mouse, aquaculture,
`horse, etc.
`The term “fermentation residuals” as used herein means
`any residual substances directly resulting from a fermenta-
`tion reaction. In some instances, a fennentation residual
`contains modified microorganisms such that it has a nutri-
`tional content enhanced as compared to a fermentation
`residual that is deficient in such modified microorganism.
`The
`fermentation
`residuals may
`contain
`suitable
`constituent(s) from a fermentation broth. For example, the
`fermentation residuals may include dissolved and/or sus-
`pended constituents from a fermentation broth. The sus-
`pended constituents may include undissolved soluble con-
`
`I0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`stituents (e.g., where the solution is supersaturated with one
`or more components) and/or insoluble materials present in
`the fermentation broth. The fermentation residuals may
`include substantially all of the dry solids present at the end
`of a fermentation (e.g., by spray drying a fermentation broth
`and the biomass produced by the fermentation) or may
`include a portion thereof. The fermentation residuals may
`include crude fermentation product
`from fermentation
`where a 1nodified—microorganism may be fractionated a11d/or
`partially purified to increase the nutrient content of the
`material.
`"he term “fatty acid” as used herein means an aliphatic or
`aromatic monocarboxylic acid.
`"he term “lipids” as used herein means fats or oils
`including without limitation the glyceride esters of fatty
`acids along with associated phosphatides, sterols, alcohols,
`hydrocarbons, ketones, and related compounds.
`'
`'he term “nutrient” as used herein means any substances
`with nutritional value. It can be part of an animal feed or
`food supplement for humans. Exemplary nutrients include
`but are not
`limited to fats,
`fatty acids,
`lipids such as
`phospholipid, vitamins, essential amino acids, peptides, pro-
`teins, carbohydrates, sterols, enzymes, and trace minerals
`such as, iron, copper, zinc. manganese, cobalt, iodine, sele-
`nium, molybdenum, nickel, fluorine, vanadiimr,
`ti11, and
`silicon. The nutrient may be secreted by a modified micro-
`organism in a fermentation broth or contained within the
`microorganism. (e.g. in inclusion bodies in the microorgan-
`ism.) The nutrient may also be added to the feed containing
`the fermentation residuals.
`“Heterologous polypeptide” or “heterologous protein”
`means derived from (i.e., obtained from) a genotypically
`distinct entity from the rest of the entity to which it is being
`compared, or that it is genetically indistinct but produced at
`an abnormally high or low concentration as compared to a
`native Lurmodified enviromnent or microorganism.
`The term “unsaturated fatty acid” as used herein means a
`faty acid with I to 3 double bonds and a “highly unsaturated
`faty acid” means a fatty acid with 4 or more double bonds.
`Fermentation Process
`Fennentation as used herein can be anaerobic (deficient in
`oxygen) as well as aerobic (oxygenated). Under aerobic
`conditions, microorganisms such as yeast cells can break
`down sugars to end products such as CO: and H20. Under
`anaerobic conditions, yeast cells utilize an alternative path-
`way to produce CO2 a11d ethanol. The fennentation reaction
`of the present invention is preferably anaerobic, i.e., par-
`tially or completely deficient in oxygen. Fermentation czm
`also be used to refer to the bulk growth of microorganisms
`on a growth medium where no distinction is made between
`aerobic and anaerobic metabo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket