throbber
~~ ~
`
`,~
`
`V~
`
`~ ~
`
`~ _ ~ .MARCH 1998
`
`~~ -s
`
`ti
`
`5'
`
`~'r3 ~:°~
`
`~q .~,
`_zk ;,,;
`.s;
`@~
`
`k~~~~ Fire ~~
`protection4 ~t~
`
`~' ~
`
`~ ~' ri
`
`y~ ,~ , .
`
`~ ~
`,~n
`
`a
`
`~'~ ~ ~_J ,www:checom
`
`,+7, fi ' ~
`., . , ~ A ~ ~,~
`i'~.
`'i~stt3' t~.{r'~ ,mac ~.:,
`j. v~
`W ..~
`~~t..
`P
`i:.. s L. ~1 ?'
`h. Q/ ~~
`
`.
`
`~
`~r 4. ) ,
`
`~. ~r f1~y-'t .
`: •
`
`1 t
`
`w
`
``~ •
`
`~;t} ..
`~ ..
`
`~~
`
``j~~'~. f ~ t k
`
`~~,i,rr
`~i:,f,}
`i:~
`~~~ e,~4~.,y • ) v~:.
`• . • ~ ,.• 7~ ~ e~,r
`
`:~
`
`i
`
`41•~~~.~~.
`
``~~y}~
`
`~
`
`1
`
`~ ~
`
`;
`
`i
`~ ~
`r ~
`5
`
`r i
`
`_;
`
`~ ~•
`~ 1~`'~,~':~
`i ;~ i~t
`
`Y -ti
`~ 7l N A I~. ~
``.yLr~ F hoc 4r W~'~~c~~: r- 2 ~ti rat Tv.. ~,r ~4~
`
`~ 1.
`
`~
`
`r~"
`
`y'.
`
`a..
`
`y,:
`
`ti
`
`w
`
`a ;
`}
`5 .l'
`~f y
`i
`
`~
`
`a;
`;
`
`'. ~' t SX it
`
`f '`+~(
`
`1/j ~ - ~ • •~ ~ k`;
`
`~.:
`
`• a
`
`f
`
`~~ Breaking . ~ ~~A: f;
`r; wastewater s
`•
`~, emulsions ~ ' `~"`
`,;_..
`.Advanced < ~',°
`dryer control ~"
`~',
`~~ ~ ~.
`~• a.
`a o ~ •.7iti t~ L k.+, ~ x' i4; • ! ~~'~• 4
`'"~ y
`gin. ~+
`',a~
`nL:~ a • t w: x~ ~ ~ ~~;
`!l
`A k
`'11 ~ Syr t ~
`~'~'`+~
`'~~'
`f
`c ' t
`Work ~ >r~t f , ,~ yi'f
`z ~~ ~,
`c ~
`~d .i ; .
`r
`~~and family ~« ~ ~~~
`begineer~ng,'r, ~
`'j~
`°~
`t 7<
`tter wine
`M ~'
`x
`-` Ciiirai ' ` f`' `'~ ti~
`t ~
`~~ i
`n
`;;chemicals '~ ' `~ wr
`. Particle-size ~ '<,`
`measurement ` ti~:
`" Dealing ~~
`~.
`~~~e
`f t ~r ;,~
`.with het lag ~' y {
`c
`Sealing~~ ~~
`~ "'.;
`;flow rates ' ~~~l
`lantwide ~r{a
`~: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
`~~ ~
`~. ~p
`organics
`
`'~~ ~~~~,~ . -S. x'~4 ~s -.V*~if
`° ~~ 1'
`•,j t`+dd, i
`"•i
`{:Yy ~rii}ti~.;8t~' )~' ~.~Jr
`r. ..,-. 'SAC :. nt SX~.'~r ~, ~q ~Y~i i.~c~F~l~j__ :yi
`a. .: .sbrt ... t~~.~.. K' ¢9 ~~~, ~.-~K .~..: ;~
`1
`~1 t ~
`~~' t ~~'~
`r n ~~~ ~
`~i
`
`~~o ~ o ~ pow= ~ K~~~~
`
`r
`
`~
`
`y' } ~'
`
`~"Y.
`
`~
`
`~ `*'"1~' to ~ ~ "~ rtt* ~
`
`'`
`
`~ ,4.
`
`s .S
`° ~
`
`ur
`
`~
`
`~.
`
`~~ t a
`
`c
`
`t( 2
`~ ~ +
`ty:~
`
`y
`
`~
`
`yip y ~ ` .:.1. .. `:9,T L r./ J ✓ V y
`
`'(,..
`
`~{ F.. ~f ~ `sg ~y~~~ ~~t it F~~(~ Y
`
`'~ _.
`
`~y
`~Y
`
`1 t ~'
`
`~
`
`t aF
`
`3~
`
`~'~~4 t ~ ~
`
`~^
`$~ ,u.'~, .',
`
`~-,
`f ~~ y~A~;
`
`1T i 'l}
`
`T~af ? ..~ 1?'r,- .
`
`..;..,.4ha ~.. T ..~ .. qYc F~.. ,..
`
`r
`
`.._•u'r~~ .7r~~_
`
`~~
`
`t*
`~~ ~~~
`
`HYDRITE EXHIBIT 1007
`(1 OF 10)
`
`

`
`MARCH 1998
`VOLUME 105,
`N0.3
`
`m
`
`~•
`:~
`
`www.~he.com
`Manufacturers
`~•;raex~, ~
`and vendors
`':
`can't just offer
`'~~~'"F~'~'"" ~
`J ~, ~~~ti: W ,~',~T~ ~ wares. They
`~ must be on the
`r =
`'.••~
`cutting edge
`• ~
`in design,
`'~~ ~ ~"~ ~ + ' "'°'
`and must test
`•+
`land optimize
`~~'` .; D'"
`~~'
`.., • :; 3 ~; ~ ~, products to
`Comer
`needs
`O' ~ ~_ ~: ..,
`
`A f filter, as shown
`at right, can
`characterize the
`size range of
`particulate matter
`that must becaptured
`byair-pollution
`control equipment
`~ .~~" ~`''fi~-.
`• • •
`Sampling of
`~ r ~~~
`~-~ '`~~ j 4~, hazardous
`~='"~ ~~ - ~G~ „ materials by means
`~4 ; ~~ ~ of an automated,
`~ ~
`~, enclosed sampler
`•% will eliminate
`~~
`of wo k rs
`, ~' -y
`
`COVER STORY
`32 The valve industry —it's
`a buyers' market
`Tighter margins and loH•er sales ~~olumes
`are forcing ~~endor mergers and acquisi-
`tions. The resulting competition is gen-
`eratingcustomer benefits pia new prod-
`uctsand impro~~ed performance
`NEWS
`~ 9 Chementator
`H?•drometallurgy route competes with
`smelting • A bidirectional pumpturbine
`• Analyze non-homogeneous particles ac-
`curately •Cheaper PCB disposal page 19
`Et}~anol route poised for commercial
`debut •New technique stabilizes en-
`zJTnes •Adding value to chicken feathers
`• Hybrid power project seeks to boost ef-
`ficiency, a~•oid emissions
`page 21
`Bacteria tacUe tough sulfur compounds •
`Online pathogen monitor • Po~~•er~density
`record for a mini gascooler •New reform-
`ingprocess gets a Uyout
`fxigr 23
`An electron beam zaps NOx and SOx •
`Alinimizr bacterial films on food-process-
`ingequipment • Flameless oxidizer dew
`Buoys gaseous and liquid pollutants •
`1'arucle characterization mo~~es from lab
`to plant
`pQ~e 25
`Predicting die impact of chemicals tin
`rn~ers • Digester goLbles hig}rsolids Nastes
`• Cut dorm sludge ~~olumes ~~ith a flash-
`and-slash routine •European Union plans
`anew R$cD program
`page 27
`U.S. DOE, EPA, FDA seek higher bud-
`ge~s •EPA: RcCorm speeds cleanup •
`EPA to case chemical-im~entory report-
`ing • UN dc~~cloping a global chemical-
`labclingstandard
`pQ~ 29
`CHEMICAL ENGINEERINC3 /MARCH 1998
`
`43 Maintaining a balance
`between work and family
`Producu~~ty increases when employers
`help workers cope with pressures off the
`job, ac well as in the workplace
`
`52 EPA issues alert on
`ammonium nitrate
`The compound, widely used as a fertil-
`izer, can support and intensify a fire,
`even in the absence of air
`6~ Chemicals: Alliances grow
`in the chiral chemicals field
`In the competition for a slice of the $14
`billion/yr business, small firmswith syn-
`thesisexperience are partnering with
`large ones that have scaleup svengths
`ENGINEERING
`37 Engineering challenge:
`Coming up with better wine
`Low-alcohol wines appeal to consumers'
`sensibilities, but not their palates. Solu-
`tions are in the works
`96 How to optimize
`dryer performance
`This second article of a two-part series fo-
`cuses on more advanced dryer controls
`that can significantly impact product
`quality and energy efiicienry
`~ 29 O&M: Sealing flowrates in
`horizontal-run pipes
`Practicalgraphs can help deteRnine if
`horizontal pipelines are running Gill of
`liquid, or if undesirable two-phase flow is
`instead occurring
`
`1 S9 Plant Notebook: Improve
`operation of BTX units
`A simulator and a data package accu-
`ratelymodel aromatics exuacuon systems
`
`ENVIRONMENT,
`HEALTH &SAFETY
`74 Feature Report Matching
`fire protection to the risk
`Effective furprotection systems make
`tl~e dill'erence between a fire that torpe-
`doesyour business and one that doesn't
`even make the local paper. But don't
`waste valuable resources on overkill
`82 Feature Report: How to
`break emulsions
`Here are some suggestions for handling
`dispersions of immiscible liquids in
`wastewater streams — a vexing problem
`for facilities attempting to comply ~+'~~'
`dischazge limits or recycle water
`89 Focus: A mobile approach
`tv air pollution control
`Portable equipment eases the task of
`handling complex problems in the field
`~ ~ 7 Environmental Manager:
`Fluegas particle size
`Size may not be everything, Uut it is a key
`factor in the selection, design and an~Y'
`sis of air polluvon convol equipment
`~ 37 Plant Notebook: Destroy~g
`organics in wastewater
`A multiplate reactor effectively reduces
`COD, while generating methane for fuel
`
`HYDRITE EXHIBIT 1007
`(2 OF 10)
`
`

`
`Working along
`with your body's
`internal clock,
`you can over-
`come the time-
`synchronization
`woes of trans-
`and interconri-
`nental travel
`
`All kinds of equipment, from
`scrubbers to filters, are going
`~ortable, to control air pollution
`m remote locations
`
`~4~ Planf Notebook: Enhancing
`worker safety
`An enclosed and automated sampler r~
`duces employees' chemical exposure
`~ ~4 Vatavuk Air Pollution
`Control Cost Indexes
`Data through 1997's fourth quarter
`
`INFORMATION
`TECHNOLOGY
`50 A survey says that IT is
`not meeting its potential
`The main barrier to implementation, say
`respondees, is resistance on the part of
`some user employees and executives
`143 Chemputers: Maximize
`profits plantwide
`Realtime, online optimization is gaining
`ground, thanks to software that allows
`for stable control models, and cheaper,
`mor~powerfu] computers
`EQUIPMENT
`& SERVICES
`72 New products
`and services
`~lowmeters ~ Oil filtration system •Ball
`valves • G~ensor transmitter • Flow-
`and-density sensor •Scrubber •Infrared
`8~ transmitter •Centrifugal pumps
`0~ Focus: Wring more from
`dryers and evaporators
`gUyers expect the devices to manage en-
`ergyconsumption, and to customize fin-
`ished products to their customers' specs
`
`.:v
`
`Technology is enabling separation
`of chiral chemicals —stereoisomers
`with identical chemical formulas
`arranged as mirror images
`of each other, but having
`different properties
`
`Optimization packages can
`make improvements in
`plant operating efficiency
`
`116 Show Previews:
`AchemAsia and Miconex
`Highlights from nvo exhibitions to be
`held in Beijing: AchemAsia (May
`11-16), and Miconex '98 (May 2rr29)
`155 Free literature
`g&p Process Equipment •National Instru-
`ments •Triple/S Dynamics • Plexco •
`Megtec Systeiiis •ITT Engineered Valves
`BUSINESS
`48 China: exception to Asia's
`political and economic cis
`Despite the turmoil in that corner of the
`world, the nation expects to spend X750
`billion over the next three ycara to u~r
`grade its infraswcwre and industry
`48 Brazil's chemical industry
`looks to compete globally
`Firms want to: harmonize criteria de6n-
`ing the industry; increase awareness and
`invesunent; and bolster exports
`50 New plants
`Chloralkali •Ethylene •Polypropylene
`• Water-absorbing polymers
`5Z Business briefs
`U.S. Filter •Culligan Water Technolo-
`gies •Coors Ceramics •Pall •Hoechst
`Celanese • GSF Chemicals
`~ 73 Capital spending index
`Covering 18 SIC categories of the CPI
`~ 74 Economic indicators
`Plant Cost ]ndex -latest figure down 0.8
`
`PERSONAL
`ISSUES
`~ ~ Bookshelf
`Reviewed: "McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of
`Science and Technology," Eighth Ed.
`55 Calendar of events
`EnviroF~cpo • CE Expo • Analytica'98 •
`Miconex '98 • AchemAsia
`67 wha~s Wno
`People on the move, by company
`~ 25 You 8 YourJob:
`Dealing with jet lag
`Traveling across time zones can be gruel-
`ing on your internal time clock
`OPINION
`& COMMENTARY
`5 Lifting the veil
`of uncertainty
`Vendors shouldn't be seen as adversaries
`of user firms; Q~ey often lave the Vest
`perspective on new products and trends
`8 Letters
`Kirkpatrick Awards • Impro~~ng OSHr1 •
`Postscripts
`ADVERTISERS
`• Product Showcase
`• Classified advertising
`• Index of advertisers
`Nor evrroN
`Chemputers VI will be part oFour first-
`ever CE Fxpo, to beheld at the George
`R. Brown Convention Center, in Hous-
`ton,June 3-4. Plan now to attend
`Cover art: SALEM KRIEGEK
`CHEMICAL ENGINEERING /MARCH 1998 3
`
`page 150
`page 157
`page 171
`
`HYDRITE EXHIBIT 1007
`(3 OF 10)
`
`

`
`t~
`ar!
`fil
`wi
`w.
`la'
`~'
`to
`or.
`er
`
`Wc
`
`ro
`th
`a:
`pf
`
`Ub
`
`~
`fo
`ri
`d~
`
`La
`
`]
`
`f~
`
`emulsifier, or stabiliser, that keeps the
`emulsion stable, binding the internal
`and external phases together, and pre-
`venting droplets from approaching
`each other and coalescing [2].
`Usually emulsifiers are surfactants
`and soaps, present either by them-
`selves or as part of the makeup of a de-
`tergent formulation. An emulsifier con-
`sists of a molecule with hydrophilic and
`hydrophobic ends. In the presence of
`immiscible liquids, the emulsifier mi-
`grates to the interface of the internal
`and external phases, forming a protec-
`tive sheath around droplets of the dis-
`persed phase, as shown in Figure 1.
`While the hydrophobic end of the mole-
`cule migrates, or partitions, intn
`droplets, the hydrophilic end stays in
`the water [l, 2].
`In efi'ect, the emulsifier acts as a cou-
`pling agent, lowering the interfacial
`tension of the internal and external
`phases. When the interfacial tension is
`reduced to zero, an emulsion forms
`spontaneously. This means the surface
`area of the internal phase has reached
`its maximum. The dispersion of fine
`droplets, generally less than 1 pm dia•,
`gives the emulsion a milky appearance.
`This effect can be achieved mechani-
`cally with colloid mills, centrifugal
`pumps and Waring-type blenders [1].
`At equilibrium, the particle size of an
`emulsion's internal phase depends on
`the amount of emulsifier available to
`maintain that equilibrium. Hence, the
`concentration of an emulsifier must be
`balanced by its droplet size to keep p~'-
`ticles from coalescing. The smaller the
`droplets, the more emulsifier required
`to cover the larger surface area. In
`other words, the concentration of emul-
`sifier determines the amount of stabi-
`lizer absorbed at the interface [2l.
`An important factor in emulsion sta-
`bility is the diameter of the dispersed
`droplets, which correlates to the vol-
`ume of the dispersed phase and the in-
`
`to get rid of them. Those who choose not
`to take this methodical approach, may
`be lucky and select the proper removal
`method. Otherwise, they will be
`stumped from the beginning.
`
`Macro globules
`
`>1 Nm
`i.a o.~
`0. t -0.05
`
`X0.05
`
`TABLE 1. HOW PARTICLE SIZE
`COLORS EMULSIONS
`Particle size (pm) Emulsion
`appearance
`Two phases may
`be distinguished
`Milky white
`emulsion
`si~e•wnite
`emulsion
`Gray,
`semihansparent
`Transparent
`microemulslon,
`wBh three or
`morn phases
`EMULSION BASICS
`Whenever two immiscible liquids, such
`as oil and water, contact each other,
`one liquid tends to disperse, but not
`dissolve, in the other. This dispersion of
`liquid, typically in an aqueous medium,
`is an emulsion. Few emulsion droplets
`are smaller than 025 pm in diameter,
`but larger ones can be more than 100
`times greater in size (Table 1).
`The two main categories of emul-
`sions are oil in water (OVA and water
`in oil (WO), with water including the
`most highly polar, hydrophilic (water-
`loving) liquids. Hydrophobic (water-
`hating) nonpolar liquids are considered
`"oils." Of concern for wastewater engi-
`neers is the OW phase, which is divided
`into three subgroups: less than 30%o oil,
`30--74% oil and 74% or more oil [1].
`Emulsions consist of three phases:
`The internal, or discontinuous, phase
`consists of finely divided droplets. The
`eternal, or continuous, phase is the
`matrix that keeps droplets in suspen-
`sion. The interphase consists of an
`
`mulsions in wastewater pose a
`vexing problem for facilities at-
`tempting to recycle water and stay
`in compliance with permissible die-
`chargelimits. But the challenges are no
`less formidable for routine mainte-
`nance. The removal of emulsions, a
`major constituent of which are fats, oils
`and greases (FOGS), is necessary to
`prevent them from depositing on pipes
`and fouling filtration media.
`Not even facilities that use crossflow
`membranes are exempt from the prob-
`lems caused by emulsions. While foul-
`ing may be eluninated, the concentrate
`that accumulates during processing re-
`maina to be dealt with.'I'he concentrate
`coats evaporator heating elements, re-
`quiring frequent cleanup and disposal.
`Cost factors weigh in, with charges for
`hauling water ranging from 15¢ to
`more than $2 per gallon.
`As permissible discharge limits are
`lowered, facilities may find it increas-
`ingly difTicult to stay in compliance. In-
`deed, afacility that is permitted to dis-
`charge b0 ppm of organic waste may
`believe it is in a safe range if the con-
`tent ofits water is only 30 ppm of oil. To
`the contrary, that oil may be putting a
`severe strain on the facilit}~s discharge
`permit for total chemical oxygen de-
`mand (COD), which includes any com-
`poundthat can be oxidized, but may be
`more difTicult to remove. And for facili-
`ties attempting to recycle water in a
`closed-loop process, FOGS simply can-
`not be ignored.
`Some of the havoc caused by emul-
`sions can be avoided if emulsions are
`broken and removed from wastewater
`streams. Successful emulsion breaking
`requires n basic understanding of
`emulsions, their chemical composition,
`and the technologies required to re-
`move them from water. Chemical engi-
`neers must ask what types of emul-
`sions are involved and then decide how
`GeorgeAlther, Biomin, Inc.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`V
`
`O
`
`~ O
`
`4
`
`J
`
`a
`
`O
`
`a
`
`O
`
`o
`
`O
`
`°o~ Removal o~~fats, oil tend greases ° a
`°ao
`~s,~ece~ary toe~cycl~~~vvater c~~d met disch~~.rge lir~,~s
`
`coo
`82 °off
`mu
`
`m
`a
`° m
`~bm
`
`o~
`~O
`~.m
`
`° o
`o
`Om
`Deb
`
`~o
`vo°
`o
`
`0
`o
`m~
`d~a
`
`0~
`~o
`~~
`
`~
`~o
`m~
`m,.,,,
`
`HYDRITE EXHIBIT 1007
`(4 OF 10)
`
`

`
`THE RIGHT BALANCE
`/~ key consideration in the formulaFion
`/`'1 of emulsions and, therefore, a factor
`in determining how they can be broken —
`is the hydrophile vs. lipophile balance
`(HLB) of emulsifiers. This measure of the rel-
`ative simultaneous attraction of an emulsi-
`~ier for oil and water is determined by the
`chemiml mmposifion and the extent of ion-
`• ization of fhe surfactant. For example, the
`HLB of propylene glycol mono stearate is
`strongly hydrophilic, while sodium stearate
`is strop ly hydrophobic. Here are recom-
`mend HlB numbers of emulsifiers oc-
`cording fo applicafion:
`HLBNUMBER
`APPl1GAT10N
`Emulsifier for waterin-oil
`4-6
`(WO) systems
`7-9
`Wetting agents
`8-18
`Emulsiers for oil-in-water
`(OMB systems
`13-15
`Detergents
`15-18
`Solubilizen
`For an oil contaminant ro be solu6ized in .
`water, the presence of a surfactant with a
`high HLB number is required. The following
`shows the acfivity of emulsified oil based on
`.the HL8 number of the surfactant presenh
`HLB RANGE
`ACTION IN WATER
`1-,4
`Not dispersible
`3-b
`Poor dispersibiliiy
`6-8
`Milky dispersion
`,. oFte~vigorousagitation
`10-13
`Stable milky dispersion
`13+
`Clear hansparenry
`(micrcemulsion)
`,. Water temperature can influence the effi-
`ciencyof anemulsifier. Nonionic surfactants
`in aqueous solutions tend to be more soluble
`when the water is cold. As the temperature
`increases, turbidly increases fo a maximum
``cbud point. By determining the cloud point,,:
`the HlB value can be estimated.
`Astable emulsion shows no indication of
`coalescence or creaming during its normal-
`e~cpectcd shelf life, even if it is frozen and
`thawed repeatedly, or exposed to elevated
`temperatures (40-50°C).
`To counter the effects of emulsifiers that
`'enhance dispersion, suspension and wet- ,
`ting of particles, emulsifiers of the oppo-
`site type , ~~~~~~~<an disrupt the HIB, can
`be applied. Depending on the emulsion, a
`strongly hydrophilic surfactant, such as
`pclysork~ate 80, or a strongly lipophilic sur
`Factant, such as monoglyceryl or diglyceryl
`O
`oleate, can break the emulsion (8].
`
`settling velocity varies as the square of
`the particle diameter. Since oil's den-
`sity is usually less than that of water,
`upward sedimentation, or creaming,
`will occur [1].
`Flocculation, or aggregation, is a sec-
`ond process that takes place in emul-
`sions with low-internal-phase ratios, as
`typically found in wastewater. Parti-
`cles slide together without coalescing to
`form clumps, or chains of clumps, of
`larger effective size. The settling rate
`then increases, even though the parti-
`cles do not behave like spheres, as
`Stoke's Law demands [2],
`Emulsifier solubility can be en-
`hanced, if necessary, by adding a co-sol-
`vent or co-emulsifier, such as propylene
`glycol, that will act as a coupler to as-
`sure stability at all temperatures. A
`blend of several surfactants can be
`added to form a tightly packed film
`around the oil droplets. The presence of
`finely divided solids, such as clays, can
`also act as emulsifiers. The oil droplets
`then coat these solids, resulting in an
`emulsion or settling.
`Electrical charge
`Across the interface of all solids and liq-
`uids is an electrokinetic gradient,
`called the Zeta potential, that is largely
`responsible for colloidal stability. Dis-
`charge of the Zeta potential, accompa-
`nied by precipitation of colloid, occurs
`by addition of polyvalent ions of a sign
`opposite that of colloidal particles.
`Adding an ionized emulsifier that is
`attracted to the oil-water interface will
`impart a positive or negative charge to
`each droplet. The coalescence rate will
`slow down as electrically repulsive
`forces build up between droplets.
`Oil droplets in an oil-in-water emul-
`sion are likely to have a negative
`charge, as described by the Helmholtz
`theory of the electrical double layer,
`wtuch states that if the negative
`charges are aligned or closely bound to
`
`terfacial area available. For example, if
`an oil is added to a container partially
`filled with water, the oil, upon impact,
`will coalesce acid float as sheen on the
`a~ater's surface. The oil forms a second
`layer or phase because its specific grav-
`ity is lower than that of water.
`If water is then blasted into the con-
`tainer, the physical impact of the water
`on the oil will cause some droplets to
`emulsify, or disperse, in the water.
`When the blast ceases, oil droplets will
`coalesce quickly.
`A surfactant or emulsifier added to
`the container will disperse the oil into
`the water. The system can be imagined
`as a collection of small spheres dis-
`persed in the continuous water please.
`Unless the droplets are small enough to
`be kept in suspension by thermal
`forces, they will eventually settle out or
`rise to the surface and form a layer of
`droplets in a process called creaming.
`Left idle, oil droplets will collide and co-
`alesce, unless enough emulsifier is
`added to cover the entire interfacial
`area. Over a period of time, larger par-
`ticles will rise to the surface and coa-
`lesceinto asingle layer f 1].
`The creaming of an emulsion, or how
`fast an oil droplet will rise to the
`water's surface, is governed by Stoke's
`Law, which states:
`where:
`u =the rate of sedimentation of a
`spherical particle
`G = acceleration of gravity
`~ =radius of the particle
`dl = density of liquid in the internal
`Phase
`~2 = density of liquid in the external
`Phase
`~ = viscosity of the emulsion
`Large droplets rise, or fall, faster
`than small ones, and drops move faster
`in a low_viscosity liquid. Therefore, if dl
`is less than d2, the particle will rise, but
`~ d2 is larger than dl, it will fall. The
`
`HYDRITE EXHIBIT 1007
`(5 OF 10)
`
`

`
`;OIL IN.WATERa~ ~~WA7ERkI~N OIL
`
`o— Oil ~ ~~,~~~~-~ Water 0.
`~~~~rPP~~
`~~f ~~~~
`'°Pf T'~~~
``~l~
`
`FEATURE REPORT
`
`FIGURE 1. (top)
`Added to an emulsion, a surtactant
`has a tendency toward orientation.
`The hydrophilic end Is attracted
`to the water, while Its hydrophobic
`end Is oriented toward the oil
`
`FIGURE 2 (bolow)
`The interphase o} an emulsion,
`conslating of an emulsifier orstabilizer,
`prevents dispersed oil droplets
`fn waterfrom coalescing
`
`the interlayer, charges of the opposite
`type will line up parallel to them, form-
`ing an electrical double layer that
`causes oil droplets to repel each other.
`Surfactants are essential compo-
`nents of formulations for processing
`textiles, pulp and paper, and deter-
`gents. They aid in dispersion, suspen-
`sion, foam suppression and particle
`wetting. But surfactants can also make
`FOG in wastewater extremely dif~`icult
`to clean up due to the solubility of oil
`emulsified by I,hem.
`The molecular structure of surfac-
`tants consist of two distinct sections.
`One is polar and water soluble. Acetic
`acid, for example, the smallest car-
`boxylic acid having any hydrocarbon
`character, is very soluble in water.lfie
`nonpolar portion of a surfactant is in-
`soluble in water [3].
`When a surfactant, or emulsifier, is
`added to an oil-in-water emulsion, it
`has a tendency toward orientation,
`whereby the emuls~er's hydrophilic
`end is dissolved into the water and its
`nonpolar hydrocarbon end is oriented
`toward the oil. When the molecules be-
`come crowded around an oil droplet,
`and space becomes limited, the film of
`surfactant around the droplet com-
`presses and the surfactant molecules
`are packed in an oriented position, as
`shown in Figure 1.
`If enough emulsifier is added to coat
`the entire surface area of the droplets,
`a stable emulsion will form that can
`last for years —such as those found in
`cosmetics and shampoos. The emulsi-
`fier thus forms a skin around each
`droplet, preventing it from colliding
`with other droplets. When oil is emulsi-
`fied in wastewater, usually at a few
`ppm to 5%, it takes only a small
`amount of detergent to emulsify the oil
`into a stable emulsion [2].
`84 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING /MARCH 1998
`
`EMULSION BREAKING
`Emulsion breaking, or demulsification
`is the separation of a dispersed liquid
`from the liquid in which it is sus-
`pended. All chemical and mechanical
`methods of emulsion breaking con-
`form to Stoke's Law.
`The objective of demulsification is to
`destroy the interface and drive the
`surfactant to either the oil side or the
`water side, allowing the oil particles
`and sediments to coalesce and rise to
`the surface, as in creaming. Demulsifi-
`cation can be enhanced by decreasing
`water-phase viscosity or increasing oil
`viscosity. Increasing the diameter of
`oil droplets and lowering the density
`of oil to water also works.
`Demulsification is divided into sev-
`eral processes:
`• Gravity separation of free, nonemul-
`sified oil
`• Chemical treatment and separation
`of emulsified oil
`• Electrolytic methods, which are not
`covered in this article
`To design a demulsification program,
`the engineer must first answer a num-
`ber of questions:
`• What type of emulsion is involved?
`• What kind of oil is in the emulsion?
`• What is the percent oil in water?
`•What is the wastewater's pH?
`• What is the oil-particle-size distrib-
`ution? For example, are the droplets
`large enough to be visible?
`• Are there solids present? If so, are
`they oil-wetted orwater-wetted?
`•Are surfactants present in either
`phase? If so, are they cationic, an-
`ionic or nonionic? Are they oil-solu-
`ble or water-soluble?
`• What type of mechanical treatment
`has the wastewater experienced
`prior to collection?
`
`• Is there violent mixing or sharp
`bends in the effluent pipes [4,5,6]?
`As a class, oils are nonionized and non-
`conductive. Inorganics are not soluble
`in most oils. The objective then is to
`move the emulsion breaker out of the
`oil droplets into the water phase.
`In wastewater, oils are defined as
`substances that can be extracted from
`water by hexane, carbon, tetrachloride,
`chloroform, fluorocarbon and Freon
`113 [6] .'I`hese tests are found in ASTM
`D 2910 and other literature [7].
`In addition to oil, used process water
`may contain metal shavings, silt, sur-
`factants, cleaners, soaps, solvents,
`metal particles and other residue that
`will accumulate in the rag layer unless
`it settles out by gravity. Depending on
`the process, the FOGS found in these
`emulsions may be fats, lubricants, cut-
`tingfluids, heary hydrocarbons such as
`tar, grease, crude oils and diesel oils,
`and light hydrocarbons, including gaso-
`line, kerosene and jet fuel. Their con-
`centrations can range from a few ppm
`to X10% of the wastewater [6].
`The stability of emulsified droplets is
`maintained by anionic and nonionic
`surfactants, and solids present on the
`interfacial film. An emulsion achieved
`with solids is most stable when the con-
`tact angle of the solids with the inter-
`face is close to 90 deg. While the Zeta
`potential of the solids may increase the
`strength and stability of the emulsion,
`surfactants are largely responsible for
`the film's high Zeta potential, high in•
`terfacial-shear viscosity, high interfa-
`cial elasticity, and relatively low inter-
`facial tension [2].
`Counteracting emulsions
`There are several strategics for coon•
`teracting emulsions:
`• Decompose the emulsion, using dig-
`solved air flotation, ozonation or
`other oxidation process. This method,
`however, is expensive
`• Chemically react the emulsion, mod-
`ifying the surfactant's charge so that
`it no longer acts as an emulsifier. For
`an ionic surfactant, neutralizAtion is
`often the simplest method, using an
`acid, base or ionizer. If a calcium or
`magnesium salt, such as CaCI or
`MgSO4 is added to an emulsion sta-
`bilized by asodium soflp,the soap will
`convert into a calcium or magnesium
`
`'
`
`HYDRITE EXHIBIT 1007
`(6 OF 10)
`
`

`
`Pump
`
`i_
`
`Rinse water
`,~
`~ - . _`
`
`FIGURE 3. A standard wastewater-treatment
`facility will remove oily contaminants to about
`30 ppm. Passing the water through a column
`of organically modified clay and activated carbon
`removes the remaining oil and surfactant, yielding
`water that is suitable for recycling and reuse
`
`,'i;~r~r
`A3r~~~
`r'~i~~'~u?2
`~~~ t
`
`------------ ---
`_
`
`-------- - - ---
`
`pH controllers
``~t
`
`'S1=
`~;~
`tii~ti~t;~,'
`
`~,
`, ~7'- k1tr~..
`
`~
`+
`
`~
`
`T
`~,~,.
`k
`~i"
`
`i
`
`K9~~'~~:
`_ ..
`~~ ~d
`;` Organoclay
`traceoil
`_removal__
`-
`
`~:3
`
`~~'
`;♦
`~ ~~~
`r; T
`
`Activated-
`VOCs
`removal
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`Source: Crcat Lakes Environmental, Ina.
`
`about 162° F) results in separation, and
`this approach is. economically feasible,
`slflm the oil off the surface. Run the
`water through an absorber vessel filled
`with organoclay to remove the remain-
`ingtraces ofoil, and follow with a treat-
`ment of activated carbon. The water is
`then available for reuse.
`Another procedure, the Babcock Test
`(ASTM D1497), can also be used to de-
`termine the amount of oil in the water
`and its state of emulsification. In this
`procedure, a sample of the emulsion is
`placed into a long, thin, graduated
`flask. Sulfuric acid is added to destroy
`the effect of the emulsifier, then the
`bottle is spun in a centrifuge until the
`oil separates. The amount of oil present
`can be read ofTthe bottle.
`Oil-particle-size distribution is also
`of use, and can be done by sight. If the
`drop size is above 200 }im, it is visible.
`Particle sizes of 100-10 }un cause a
`milky white appearance, 10-1 aun, a
`bluish-white color, and 1-0.5 }un, a
`smoky gray color. Below 0.5 pm, the liq-
`uid is transparent. Light scattering de-
`vices and refractive index measure-
`ments are the primary instruments
`used to measure droplet size [S].
`Particle charge measurements hove
`been reported to aid in determining the
`treatment method. Ionic emulsifiers
`contribute a charge to the interface
`that can be determined by electrodes. If
`the external phase is nonconductive,
`such as in a water-in-oil emulsion,
`which can consist of 80°,~ water, the
`drops acquire a static charge. Charges
`can be induced on the particles by an
`electric or magnetic field (1].
`(Continues on next page)
`CHEMICAL ENGINEERING / MARCN 1998 85
`
`ice,
`
`Ferric
`..
`
`separator
`
`JAEGER
`
`. ((~
`
`~
`
`a,:-
`
`~")
`~
`~. C.8U8t~C ~. ~ ~
`
`' ,
`
`C hCIT1IC8I
`treatment
`
`Of IS ',';.
`~: ~
`
`soap, which is less sol-
`uble inwater because the
`interfacial film has changed. The
`emulsion may break
`• Increase the solubility of the surfac-
`tant in either bulk phase. Alcohol or
`other polar solvents, such as acetone,
`can be used to increase solubility in
`the water phase and pull the emulsi-
`fier out of the oil phase. If the aque-
`ous phase is a brine, dilution with
`water may be all that is needed to
`achieve separation
`• Disrupt the oriented structure of the
`emulsifier's interfacial phase with
`demulsifiers. Because these materi-
`als are not very soluble in either
`phase, they concentrate at the inter-
`face. Separation occurs when the
`agents insert themselves between
`the surfactant molecules, increasing
`the intermolecular distance and
`weakening the binding forces con-
`atructed by the emulsifier [5].
`Chemical demulsifiers provide the op-
`posite charge to the emulsion, allowing
`the accumulated electrical charge on
`the interface of the emuls~ed oil
`droplets to be neutralized. Normally,
`cationic dem~sifiers, which exhibit a
`Positive charge when dissociated in
`Warr, are used to destabilize oil-water
`emulsions. Coalescence occurs when
`the ?,eta potential of the surfactant ap-
`Proaches zero, at which point coales-
`cence is inprogress [6].
`Though organic emulsion breakers
`produce less sludge than inorganic
`coagulants, ferric and aluminum
`chloride, continue to be among the
`most wic]ely used chemicals for emul-
`
`sion breaking (Table 2).
`Ferric chloride and aluminum chlo-
`ride break emulsions by lowering the
`wastewater's pH, which aids in the coa-
`lescence of oil droplets. The disadvan-
`tage of using these inorganic com-
`pounds, however, is that they build up
`sludge and are difficult to remove.
`Salts such as aluminum sulfate add
`ionic strength and a high charge, which
`help later removal of surfactants by ac-
`tivated carbon, although pH must be
`raised back to 8 to do that successfully.
`However, removal of as much of the
`solids as possible prior to emulsion
`breaking will reduce the demand for
`treatment chemicals and lower pro-
`cessing costs [4].
`Testing procedures
`Before applying treatment to break an
`emulsion, the first step is to establish
`that an emulsion, with two separate
`phases, is present. If the wastewater is
`cloudy or opaque, with visible amounts
`of a second liquid at the top or bottom of
`the sample container, or sticking to its
`side, it is probably an emulsion. But it
`could also be a slurry of finely divided,
`colloidal solids [5].
`To test, mix the sample thoroughly,
`place it into a test tube, place the test
`tube into a hot bath. Does separation
`occur? Do solids settle? Is there a
`change of color?
`Many emulsions are light brown or
`cream colored. As they begin to break,
`they first darken, then separate. U the
`liquid is n clear, one-phase liquid, but
`becomes cloudy upon being heating, a
`microemulsion or nonionic detergent
`may be present. If simple heating (to
`
`HYDRITE EXHIBIT 1007
`(7 OF 10)
`
`

`
`FEATURE REPORT
`
`Physical separation methods
`Most oily waste is a combination of
`free, nonemulsified oil, stable emulsi-
`fied oil and insoluble solids, including
`grit, metal fines, carbon, paint, pig-
`ments and corrosion products. There
`are several methods for physical sepa
`ration of emulsions. Some are more of
`fective than others. There is a myriad
`of equipment and configurations avail-
`able for emulsion separation, including
`coalescers, centrifuges and skimmers:
`Coalesces. Suitable for emulsions
`that have been induced mechanically,
`process separators can remove free oil
`droplets by gravity if they are larger
`than 0.015 cm dia. Proper sizing and pip-
`ingdesign of the separator, which c

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket