throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 12
`Entered: December 14, 2015
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`JT INTERNATIONAL, S.A.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`FONTEM HOLDINGS 1 B.V.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01513 (Patent 8,375,957 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01578 (Patent 8,689,805 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01587 (Patent 8,365,742 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01604 (Patent 8,863,752 B2)1
`____________________
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, JAQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA,
`GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, DONNA M. PRAISS, BRIAN J.
`MCNAMARA, RAMA G. ELLURU, and JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIUM.
`
`
`ORDER
`Dismissing Petitions
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.71(a), 42.74
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues common to all cases; therefore, we issue a
`single order to be entered in each proceeding. The parties, however, are not
`authorized to use this heading.
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01513 (Patent 8,375,957 B2)
`IPR2015-01578 (Patent 8,689,805 B2)
`IPR2015-01587 (Patent 8,365,742 B2)
`IPR2015-01604 (Patent 8,863,752 B2)
`
`
`The parties filed a joint motion to terminate each proceeding
`identified in the caption. Paper 11.2 Along with the motion, the parties filed
`a copy of a document they describe as their written settlement agreement
`(Ex. 2029), as well as a separate joint request to treat the settlement
`agreement as business confidential information. Paper 12; see 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c) (a party to a settlement may request that the settlement agreement
`be treated as business confidential and be kept separate from the patent file).
`The parties represent that the settlement agreement resolves all disputes
`between the parties that involve the patents-at-issue. Paper 11, 4–5.
`The cases are in a preliminary stage. The Board has not yet issued
`decisions on whether to institute the proceedings.
`We are persuaded that, under these circumstances, it is appropriate to
`dismiss the petition in each proceeding. 35 C.F.R. § 42.71(a). This paper
`does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`It is
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate is granted and the
`petition is dismissed in each proceeding;
`
`
`2 Substantially similar papers and exhibits were filed in each proceeding.
`For convenience, we refer to paper and exhibit numbers in IPR2015-01513.
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01513 (Patent 8,375,957 B2)
`IPR2015-01578 (Patent 8,689,805 B2)
`IPR2015-01587 (Patent 8,365,742 B2)
`IPR2015-01604 (Patent 8,863,752 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request to treat the settlement
`agreement as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the
`patent file, is granted in each proceeding.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Erik Swenson
`erik.g.swenson@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`George Jordan
`george.jordan@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael Wise
`mwise@perkinscoie.com
`
`Joseph Hamilton
`jhamilton@perkinscoie.com
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket