throbber
5'
`3E
`,|
`'§J_OL.|RNAL OF
`-_TffHE AMERICAN
`ESOCIETY OF
`'!'EiEMa’—\TOLClGY
`
`VOLUME 93
`
`‘NUMBER 11
`
`glrican Society of
`
`!
`
`Hematology
`
`F‘;o'Jty-third annual
`
`Hating program
`nd absira cts
`
`Dr. eddy‘5 Laboratoris, Ltd., et a}.
`V.
`
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A et al.
`U.S. Patent No. 8329. 94
`
`Reddy Exhibit 1018
`-.
`
`Exh. 1018
`
`rI
`
`.z
`5
`
`\.
`
`f F
`
`

`
`350b
`Abstract# 5167
`Outcomes of Stem Cell Tr ansplant Recipients Req uiring
`Mecha nical Ventilation and Cared for in t he Bone Mar row
`Transplant Unit. Omanlyi Omotos<i*, Hanna Khoury, Doug Adkins,
`William Blum, Manuel lregui*, Peter Westervelt, Ravi Vij, Randy Brown,
`Lawrence Goodnough, John DiPersio. Bone Marrow Transplantation and
`Leukemia, Washington University School of Medicine, Sc. Louis, MO, USA.
`The outcome of stem cell transplant (SCf) recipients admitted to the medical intensive
`care unit (MICU) has been well documented with reported survival Tates of 10-18% (Ann
`lnt Med 1996; 125:625). We sought to determine, in a single centre. the outcomes ofSCf
`recipients requiring intubation and mech anical ventilation and who were nursed in
`designated ICU rooms within the BMT unit. Between May 1996 and March 2001, 1,269
`patients received scr at Washington University in St.-Louis, and 59 (4.6%) required
`intubation and mechanical ventilation. Patients characteristics were as follows: median
`age was 46 years (range, 19-66); diagnoses included acute and chronic leukemias (n-25,
`42%) and non-leukemic malignancies (n=34, 58%). Twenty patients (34%) received
`autologous SCT, while 2 1 (36%) received allogeneic SCf from a marched sibling donor and
`18 (30%) rrom a n'atched unrelated donor. TBI was included in the conditioning in 68%
`(n=40). Median time from SCf to intubation was 19 days (range, 0 -1351), and median
`duration of intubat ion was 5 days (range, 1-38 days). Infectious complications (sepsis,
`pneumonia) were the most common indications for intubation (94%). Kaplan-Meierestimates
`for survival I month, 3 months and I year post-intubation were 25%, 24% and 21%,
`respectively. Variables associated with poor outcomes were analyzed. The presence of
`hyperbilirubinemia (serum bilirubin >3mgldl) or renal dysfunction (creatinine >2 mg/dl)
`24 hours prior to inrubation, or an APACHE Ill score > 75 determined 24 hours post-
`intubation were associated with a 0% extubation rate and survival. Only 1118 unrelated
`donor transplant recipient survived. In summaty, our results show that the management of
`SCf recipients reql!liring inrubation and mechanical ventilation is feasible in the BMT unit
`and is associated with a similar survival to patients transferred to the MICU. Nursing these
`patients in the BMT unit offers family members uninterrupted access to the patient, comparable
`outcomes to those observed in the MlCU and continuous accessibility to BMT trained
`health care personnel.
`
`Abstract# 5168
`P ediatric Hem atopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in t he
`Chilean Public Health System: I nitial Experience. J. Palma*, C.
`Mosso*, M. Campbell*, C. Salgado*', L. Vargas~, A. Becker"', P. Advis*, J.
`Quintana*, H. Garcia*, V. Beresi* . (Intr. by Gaston K. Rivera) PINDA
`(Programa ilifcw til Nacional de Drogas Antineoplasicas) and Hospital
`Luis Calvo Mackenna, Santiago. Chile.
`The national pediatric oncology cooperative group in Chile, PINDA, was founded 14
`y~.ars ago. Initially, HSCT was nor available ro patients locally. With combined efforts from
`PfNOA and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, TN, USA, in October 1999
`a transplant unit was opened at Hospital Luis Calvo Mackenna, a public pediatric center
`with affiliation to the University of Chile. EligJble for transplantation, at no cost to their
`families, were all c·hildren treated at PINDA instirutions. We report results for the initial 21
`HSCf procedures performed: 18 allogeneic (17 matched-sibling and one haplotype-matched
`parent), and 3 autologous. Median age at the time of HSCf was 6 years (0.5-17 years).
`Diagnoses included CML (n=2), AML CR I, 2 (n=4), ALL CR I, 2, 3 (n=4), Hodgkin (n=l ),
`neuroblastoma IV (n=l ), severe aplastic anemia (n=6), Kostman synd rome (n=l), and SCID
`(n=l). Chemotherapy W'IS given as preparative regimen in 9 allogeneic and 2 autologous
`HSCT; chemotherapy and total body irradiation in 5 and with total nodal irradiation in an
`additional5 cases. The median CD34 cell count was 2.64 x 106/kg (range, 1.31 to 7.2xiO'/
`kg) when marrow cells were infused and 5.68 x I o• (range, 3.26 to 9.09x l 0') when peripheral
`blood cells were·used. Heparin prophylaxis for venoclusive disease (VOO) was given to all
`patients from day -7 to +21 and cyclosporine was administered to patients who received
`allogeneic HSCT. NeutTOphil counts were recovered at a median time of 19.3 days (range, 9-
`34), platelets 19 days (range, 12-42) and reticulocyte counts were> 1 o/o at .17.4 days (range,
`11-34). Only 4 children had documented bacteremia, 3 developed grade lll-IV graft vs. host
`disease, and no patient had VOD or required mechanical ventilation. There were no transplant
`related deaths. One patient died following disease relapse. All other patients are clinically
`well. Fifteen of 15 patients showed donor ·engraftment as indicated! by molecular testing.
`Costs with up to 2 years of follow-up were $20,000 for autologous and $40,000 for allogeneic
`cases. The ongoing results show acceptable rates of morbidity and.mortality and an
`encouraging outcome. Since these results arc comparable to those obtained at international
`centers, we demonstrate that HSCf can be successfully performed, and at reduced costs,
`within the public health system of developing nations.
`
`Abstract# 5169
`An I nteresting 5-HT 3 Receptor Antagonist Antiemetic for Patients
`Undergoing Chemotherapy-Based Conditioning Regimens? Gaia
`Piraccini*,1 Randall Stolz*,2 Munetetsu Tei*,3 Steve Chernoff"':' (lntr. by
`John C. Byrd) 1Helsi1111 Healthcare SA. Lugano, Switzerland; 1GFI
`Pharmaceutical Services, Evansville. IN. USA: 1Schoo/ of Medicine.
`University of Tokyo, Tokyo. Japan; 'US Micron, Lenexa. KS, USA.
`Palonosetron is a potent, highly selective 5-HT, receptor antagonist with a strong
`binding affinity, long half-life and a low incidence of side effects. It does not exist as a racemic
`mixture as do other 5-HT, antagonists buu rather as a single stereoisomer. Five Phase I
`studies evaluated the pharmacokineric and metabolic profile of palonosetron. Two studies
`used the IV formul ation with dose ranges of0.3-90 meg/kg, while two studies used the oral
`formulation with dose ranges of 3-90 meg/kg. The fifth srudy used ["C]-palonosetron to
`determine the metabolic profile and pharmacokinetics in plasma and urine. The studies
`showed that 62% of palonosetron is protein bound. The liver metabolizes approximately
`
`CLINICAL CARE- TRANSPLANTATION REGIMEN TOXICITIES AND ENGRAFTMENT
`
`50"/o of the drug with 40% found unchanged in the urine. The most interesting characteristic
`however, is the long half-life. T he elimination half-life is about 40 hours, which is longer
`than any other available 5-HT, receptor antagonist (r,.nge 5.5-9 hours). There were no
`unexpected treatment emergent adverse events, nor were there any serious adverse events
`seen in the 17 3 subjects evaluated for safety. The most common adverse events were headache
`and constipation (6% and II% respectively over the placebo rate), generally mild to moderate.
`Adverse events were not dose related. The strong binding affinity coupled with the chemical
`characteristics of the molecule may explain its high potency. Similarly, since a long duration
`of acti<:m may result from the long half-life and strong binding affinity, a Phase 11 dose
`ranging study was initiated. The study was designed to evaluate approximately 150 patients
`receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were assigned to one of five (5) dose
`grou1>s of IV palonosetron while undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy including
`cyclop.hosphamide. Patients were evaluated for efficacy including duration of action, safety
`and pharmacokinetics for prevention of both acute emesis as well as emesis occurring on
`days 2-7. The encouraging phannacokinetic results from five Phase 1 trials ofpalonosetron
`provided a basis to design the previously described Phase II dose ranging trial. This trial
`would evaluate the potential benefit of palonosetron for the prevention of nausea and
`vomiting in patients, including those receiving muliti-day stem cell transplantation
`conditioning regimens.
`
`Abstr act# 5170
`Effect of Bowel Prepantion in Patients Undergoing HDSCT in a
`Community Hospital Setting. Anastasios Raptis,' Oscar Ballester,1
`Bradford Tan*, 1 Patti Wilcox*,' James Grutscb*,' Brian Braun*.' 'Bone
`Marrow Transplant Program, Midwestem Regional Medical Centet; Zion,
`IL, USA; 2Bone Man·ow Transplqnt Program, Albany Medical Cente1;
`Albany, NY. USA.
`Infection is an important complication of patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy
`and stem cell transplantation (HDSCT), contributing significantly to the morbidity and
`mortality associated with the procedure. In an effort to reduce the prevalence of d eveloping
`bacterial infection in this group of patients, physicians at MR.MC-CTCA developed a
`protocol using the product GoLYTELY®(GT) to prepare the patient's bowel prior to stem
`cell transplantation. We evaluated the hypothesis that the GT treatment reduced the
`prevalence of positive bacterial cultures. At MRMC-CTCA 141 patients underwent HDSCf
`between September of 1994 and December of2000. Forty-four patients received one gallon
`ofGT once, one day prior to initiation of high dose chemotherapy (group A). Ninety-four
`of the patients received no GT (group B). There was no difference in the age d istribution
`between group A and group B, 48 and 50.2 respectively (Median test two tailed p =
`0.37).Patients with the following diagnoses received HDSCT at our institution; breast
`cancer 73 (51.5%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 30 (21%), multiple myeloma 19 (13.7%), and
`ovarian cancer 12 (8.5%), AML 2 (1.4%), CLL 2 (1.4%), Hodgkin's lymphoma I (0.96%),
`small cell lung cancer I (0.7 1 %), and testicular cancer I (0.7 1 %). GTtreatment was initiated
`in June of 1999. Prior to the use of GT, the prevalence of positive cultures was 67% (63
`positive cultures in 94 patients). Following the use of GT the rate of positive cultures fell
`to 47.7% in the 44 GT patients (21 positive cultures in 44 patients), a statistically significant
`difference (2-tail Fisher's Exact Test p = .0396). GT, as expected, had no effect on the prevalence
`of viral (3.2% vs. 2.3%) and fungal infections (3.2% vs. 2.3%). In these patients 21 had
`positive gram-negative cultures and sixty-two had posit;ve gr•m-positive cultures. GT did
`not significantly reduce the prevalence of gram-negative strains, 17 o/o to 11.2 %(fisher's
`exact test 2 tailed p = 0.455), but there was significant reduction in the prevalence of gram-
`positive strains from 60.6% to 42.2 o/o (Fisher's exact 2 tailed p = 0.066). The ho<Spital stay
`for group A patients was 23 days, while in group B patients it was 19.5 days (Kruskal-
`Wallis P = 0.077). Clinically, time to leukocyte engraftment was not significantly different
`between the A and B groups, 13.2 days versus 12.4 days. The median time to platelet
`engraftment for group A was 15 days and group B was 12 days(Kruskal-Wallis two tailed
`p= 0.006). Seventeen patients died withln one hundred. days of stem cell rra.nsplantation.
`We evaluated the effect of GT on survival to one year. There was no survival difference
`between group A and group B patients (Two tailed Lpg Rank p ~ 0.88), where 74% of the
`group A and 70% of the group B patients achieved one-year survival. Finally, the prevalence
`of non-prophylactic antibiotic therapy was unaffected by the use of GT and the median time
`on non-prophylactic antibiotics was identical between the two groups, 13 days. We conclude
`that the use of GT significantly reduced the incidence of gram-positive bacterial culttJTes in
`the study population as compared ro those that did not receive GT. In addition, the use of
`GT is linked to a longer time to platele.t engraftment.

`
`Abstract# 5171
`T he I nfluence of Amifostine of the Immune-Reconstitution after
`Conventional- and Hi gh-Dose Chemoth erapy in Patients with
`Germ Cell Tumor. Oliver 0 . Rick*,' Joerg J. Beyer*/ Stefan S. Serke*,3
`Nimrod N. Schwella*,l Wolfgang W. Siegert.' 'Charite Berlin, Oncology!
`Hematology. Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2Universitaetsklinikum Marbwg.
`Hematology/Oncology, Marburg, Hessen, Germany; 1Cirarite Berlin,
`Hematology/Oncology, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
`We assessed the influence ofamifostine on immune-reconstitution after conventional-
`dose (CDCf) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDCf) followed by autologous peripheral
`blood progenitor cell (PBPC) rescue in patients with germ cell tumor (GCT). fou.rty patients
`were treated with one day cycle of 175 mglqm paclitaxel, 5 glqm ifosfamide (Tl) plus 10 11g/
`kg/day granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize PBPC, followed by 3
`cycles of coer with 175 mglqm paclitaxel, 6 glqm ifosfamide, 100 mglqm cisplatin (TIP)
`plus 5 j.!g/kglday G-CSF and one course of HDCf with l ,5 glqm carboplatin, 2.4g/qm
`etoposide, 450 mglqm thiotepa (CET) plus PBPC rescue and 5 ).lg/kg/day G-CSF. All
`patien.ts were randomized to receive an absolute dose of 500 mg arnifostine (group A, n~ 20)
`on each day of chemotherapy or no amifostine (group B, n~ 20).lmmune status was measured
`prior each cycle ofCDCT, prior HDCT, after hematologic engraftment from CET as well as 6
`
`Exh. 1018

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket