`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 3
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SYMANTEC CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01547
`Patent 8,141,154 B2
`____________
`
`Mailed: July 17, 2015
`
`Before KAREN I. SWEENEY, Trial Paralegal
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION
`AND
`TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
`
`
`The petition for inter partes review in the above proceeding has been
`
`accorded the filing date of July 3, 2015.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01547
`Patent 8,141,154 B2
`
`
`A review of the petition identified the following defect(s):
`
`In the section of Certificate of Service, Petition did not indicate that
`
`the exhibits were being served. A new Certificate of Service is needed.
`
` Failure to provide copies of the exhibit(s) to the patent owner. 35
`U.S.C. §§ 312(a)(5), 322(a)(5).
`
`
`Petitioner must correct the defect(s) within FIVE BUSINESS DAYS
`
`from this notice. Failure to correct the defect(s) may result in an order to
`
`show cause as to why the Board should institute the trial. No substantive
`
`changes (e.g., new grounds) may be made to the petition.
`
`Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later
`
`than three months from the date of this notice. The preliminary response is
`
`limited to setting forth the reasons why the requested review should not be
`
`instituted. Patent Owner may also file an election to waive the preliminary
`
`response to expedite the proceeding. For more information, please consult
`
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012),
`
`which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`
`Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory
`
`notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of
`
`the petition.
`
`The parties are encouraged to use the heading on the first page of this
`
`Notice for all future filings in the proceeding.
`
`The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of
`
`counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause. The parties are
`
`authorized to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order --
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639,
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01547
`Patent 8,141,154 B2
`
`Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under
`
`“Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.”
`
`The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the
`
`Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web
`
`site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`
`If there are any questions pertaining to this notice, please contact
`
`Karen I. Sweeney at 571-272-4673 or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at
`
`571-272-7822.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph J. Richetti
`Daniel A. Crowe
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`dacrowe@bryancave.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Dawn-Marie Bey
`Bey & Cotropia PLLC
`213 Bayly Court
`Richmond VA 23229
`
`
`
`Paul J. Andre
`Hannah Yunkyung Lee
`James R. Hannah
`Lisa Kobialka
`Michael H. Lee
`Benu C. Wells
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01547
`Patent 8,141,154 B2
`
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`hlee@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`mhlee@kramerlevin.com
`bwells@kramerlevin.com
`
`4