throbber
I-l>UJ[\.)|—‘
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 1
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
`
`LTD.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`VS.
`
`ELBRUS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`\’\¢\¢\¢\¢\¢\¢\¢\¢\¢\/\/
`
`CASE NO.
`
`IPR2015-01524
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`ELBRUS—IPR2
`
`A.M. SESSION
`
`DEPOSITION OF R.
`
`JACOB BAKER, PH.D.
`
`LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
`APRIL 1, 2016
`
`REPORTED BY:
`
`KRISTY L. CLARK, RPR, NV CCR #708,
`
`CA CSR #13529
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 2
`
`DEPOSITION OF R.
`
`JACOB BAKER,
`
`PH.D.,
`
`taken at 10080
`
`West Alta Drive, Suite 200,
`
`Las Vegas,
`
`Nevada,
`
`on Friday,
`
`April 1, 2016,
`
`at 9:01 a.m.,
`
`before
`
`Kristy L.
`
`Clark,
`
`Certified Court Reporter,
`
`in and for
`
`the State of Nevada.
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`For the Petitioner:
`
`LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH N. HOSTENY
`
`BY:
`
`JOSEPH N. HOSTENY, ESQ.
`
`181 West Madison Street
`
`Suite 4600
`
`Chicago, Illinois 60602
`
`(312) 278-3778
`
`jhosteny@hosteny.com
`
`For the Patent
`
`Owner:
`
`PAUL HASTINGS,
`
`LLP
`
`BY:
`
`STEVEN L.
`
`PARK,
`
`ESQ.
`
`BY:
`
`JOEL LIN,
`
`ESQ.
`
`1170 Peachtree
`
`Street,
`
`N.E.
`
`Suite100
`
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`
`(404) 815-2223
`
`stevenpark@paulhastings.com
`
`Also Present:
`
`William R. Huber, D.Sc., P.E.
`
`\'lO‘\U‘||-l>bx)|.\)|—‘
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
`I N D E X
`
`WITNESS:
`
`R.
`
`JACOB BAKER,
`
`PH.D.
`
`EXAMINATION
`
`PAGE
`
`By Mr. Hosteny
`
`INDEX TO EXHIBITS
`
`(None marked.)
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`LAS
`
`VEGAS, NEVADA, FRIDAY,
`
`APRIL 1,
`
`2016;
`
`Page 4
`
`9:01 A.M.
`
`—oOo—
`
`Thereupon——
`
`R.
`
`JACOB BAKER, PH.D.
`
`I
`
`was called as a witness,
`
`and having been first duly
`
`sworn,
`
`was examined and testified as follows:
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`EXAMINATION
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Will you tell us your name,
`
`please.
`
`Russell Jacob Baker.
`
`And what's your present occupation?
`
`I'm a professor of electrical and computer
`
`engineering at UNLV.
`
`Q.
`
`A
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`Do you have a PhD?
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay.
`
`You prefer Doctor or...
`
`Doctor is fine.
`
`Doctor is fine. Good.
`
`All right. Dr. Baker,
`
`when were you retained
`
`to assist
`
`Samsung in this matter?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Sometime last year.
`
`Okay.
`
`Sometime in 2015?
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`YES .
`
`All
`
`right.
`
`And were you provided materials,
`
`Page 5
`
`or did you gather materials on your own?
`
`MR.
`
`PARK:
`
`Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I don't remember.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Right.
`
`Were you given the Podlesny patent,
`
`which is Exhibit 1001?
`
`There's a stack for you.
`
`MR.
`
`PARK:
`
`Is this mine?
`
`MR.
`
`HOSTENY:
`
`Actually,
`
`that one is
`
`mine.
`
`MR.
`
`PARK:
`
`Is there another?
`
`MR.
`
`REMMEL:
`
`Actually, we might not
`
`have one.
`
`MR.
`
`HOSTENY:
`
`I apologize.
`
`I didn't --
`
`MR.
`
`PARK:
`
`No.
`
`No worries.
`
`MR.
`
`HOSTENY:
`
`I didn't make four copies;
`
`I
`
`made three.
`
`MR.
`
`PARK:
`
`We can just share.
`
`MR.
`
`HUBER:
`
`Joe,
`
`I have got,
`
`I
`
`think, a full
`
`set .
`
`MR.
`
`HOSTENY:
`
`You do too.
`
`MR.
`
`HUBER:
`
`So I can give you --
`
`MR.
`
`HOSTENY:
`
`All right. All right. Yeah.
`
`Here, you
`
`can
`
`take that one.
`
`MR.
`
`PARK:
`
`Okay.
`
`Thank you.
`
`MR.
`
`HOSTENY:
`
`Okay.
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`All righty.
`
`Page 6
`
`Were you given the Podlesny patent exhibit,
`
`what's been marked as Exhibit 1001 in the proceeding?
`
`A.
`
`I don't recall if I was given the patent or I
`
`downloaded it from some place on the Internet.
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`In any event, you obtained it
`
`from somewhere?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Okay. At Exhibit —— wait a minute.
`
`Would you take a look at Exhibit 1005, please.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`(Witness complies.)
`
`That's the Sukegawa patent; right?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`You guys have one for me?
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`I keep --
`
`MR. PARK: We may have some other copies.
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Wait a minute. No.
`
`I'm
`
`looking at the wrong stack here, Steve. Hold on just a
`
`second.
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Thanks.
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`In fact, why don't you just
`
`take —— you didn't mark this up or anything, did you?
`
`MR. HUBER:
`
`I did not.
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Why don't you just take that
`
`stack?
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`MR. PARK: Fantastic.
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`That was Bill's, and we can --
`
`Page 7
`
`we'll use
`
`this one here.
`
`MR. PARK: Okay.
`
`MR. HOSTENY: All right? Okay.
`
`Yeah,
`
`this is separate. That's just for the
`
`reporter.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`All right. Have you had a chance to look at
`
`1005,
`
`the
`
`Sukegawa patent?
`
`A.
`
`(Witness reviewing document.)
`
`YES .
`
`Q.
`
`And did you obtain that patent sometime last
`
`summer or last year?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`How did you identify the Sukegawa patent?
`
`Did someone tell you,
`
`or did you find it on your own?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`I don't recall.
`
`Okay.
`
`In any event, you got it.
`
`Take a look at 1006,
`
`the Watanabe patent.
`
`Okay.
`
`Did you obtain a copy of that from some
`
`source,
`
`either the Internet or someone else?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`YES .
`
`All right. This would have been last year?
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`All right.
`
`Take a look at Exhibit 1007,
`
`the
`
`Page 8
`
`Hardee patent.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Is that a patent that you also obtained
`
`sometime last year?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`paper.
`
`YES .
`
`And lastly,
`
`Exhibit 1008, which is an IEEE
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Seem to be missing one.
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Not there?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`NO.
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Got one? Okay. Let me see if
`
`I have an
`
`extra.
`
`MR. PARK: Has this been marked?
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Hold on a second.
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Oh, here it is.
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`You got it?
`
`MR. PARK: Yeah.
`
`It's here.
`
`Sorry.
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Okay.
`
`Problem solved.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Dr. Baker, have you looked at 1008?
`
`Yes.
`
`And is that a document that you received
`
`sometime last
`
`last year?
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`A.
`
`I don't recall if I received it or I
`
`downloaded it myself.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Either way, you had it last year,
`
`Page 9
`
`though; correct?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Did you do any independent searching
`
`to find any references, patents, or documents that you
`
`thought might be pertinent to the work you were asked
`
`to do?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`I'm going to object and instruct
`
`the witness to answer that question but not reveal any
`
`privileged communications in the answer.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Can you repeat
`
`the question,
`
`please.
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Why don't you read it back.
`
`(Record read by the reporter.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I believe I did, yes.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Did any of those documents become references
`
`that you relied on in your report?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`I don't recall.
`
`All right.
`
`And your report, by the way,
`
`is
`
`Exhibit 1002, or your declaration,
`
`I suppose I should
`
`say?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Going back to Exhibit 1008,
`
`take a
`
`look at Figure 4.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`(Witness complies.) Okay.
`
`Do you see the horizontal lines connected to
`
`the right side by something called QEQ?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`That is a transistor?
`
`If what you're referring to is the same thing
`
`that I
`
`think you're referring to, yes.
`
`A transistor is
`
`connected with its gate to a signal on the far right,
`
`which is a vertical line labeled fee 3.
`
`Q.
`
`All right. What kind of transistor is that?
`
`Is that a PMOS or an NMOS,
`
`if you're familiar with that
`
`terminology?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`It is an NMOS.
`
`Okay. And if fee 3 —— if there's a signal on
`
`fee 3, what happens with the transistor?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Does anything happen with the transistor?
`
`A.
`
`If the signal
`
`is 0 volts on fee 3,
`
`the
`
`transistor's off. And if the signal on fee 3 is, say,
`
`Vdd,
`
`the transistor's on.
`
`Q. What's the value of Vdd?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Let me clarify. Vdd is a voltage; correct?
`
`A.
`
`Yes. Vdd is a power supply voltage. And on
`
`the first page of Exhibit 1008,
`
`in the left—hand
`
`column, one value for Vdd that's listed there, about
`
`the tenth line from the bottom in that left column,
`
`is
`
`5 volts for Vdd.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Okay.
`
`So if fee 3
`
`in Figure 4
`
`is
`
`zero, correct me if I'm wrong,
`
`the transistor is turned
`
`off?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`Q.
`
`And if fee 3
`
`is Vdd or 5 volts,
`
`then the
`
`transistor would be turned on?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Can the transistor be turned on with a
`
`value of other than 5 volts, something less, for
`
`example?
`
`If so, how much?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS: When you say "turned on," can
`
`you be a little bit more specific what that means?
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`I was trying to use your terminology.
`
`Suppose that there's a signal on fee 3, but it's not 5
`
`volts.
`
`Suppose it's 4.5 volts.
`
`Or 4.
`
`Let's just say
`
`4 or above. Will that transistor turn on?
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`It will turn on,
`
`just not as
`
`Page 12
`
`much as when there's 5 volts on the gate of the
`
`transistor.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Is there a point between 5 volts and
`
`zero where it will not turn on?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same objection.
`
`THE WITNESS: Assuming that the only voltages
`
`on the chip are zero —— between zero and Vdd, meaning
`
`there are no negative voltages --
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Uh—huh.
`
`A.
`
`—— then, when fee 3 reaches the threshold
`
`voltage of the transistor, say,
`
`.8 volts, and assuming
`
`one of the lines connected to the transistor is at 0
`
`volts,
`
`the transistor will shut off or start to
`
`shutoff.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. What's —— what is the "threshold"?
`
`What do you mean by that?
`
`A.
`
`Loosely speaking,
`
`that's the voltage between
`
`the gate and the source where the transistor starts to
`
`conduct current.
`
`Now, below the threshold voltage,
`
`the
`
`transistor still can leak current,
`
`so it's not totally
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
`off. But,
`
`in general
`
`terms, when one of skill in the
`
`art says threshold voltage,
`
`they're referring to when
`
`the transistor tllI‘I1S On.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. All right.
`
`So it's possible for this
`
`transistor to have a threshold voltage of 0.8 volts, as
`
`low as that?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`You may have been giving me an example,
`
`so
`
`I —— I —— I may not be correct when I say that.
`
`A.
`
`I don't recall in the paper what value of
`
`threshold voltage they actually specified.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Okay. And the voltage —— the
`
`threshold voltage you mentioned is measured between,
`
`I
`
`think you said,
`
`the gate and the source?
`
`A.
`
`The threshold voltage is measured between the
`
`gate and the source, and it assumes there's a potential
`
`between the drain of the transistor and a source so
`
`that current can flow.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. When you say "potential," what do you
`
`mean?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Voltage.
`
`Okay.
`
`Now,
`
`if this transistor in Figure 4,
`
`QEQ —— I don't think I gave you that one on the list
`
`but I'll have to.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`If QEQ is above its threshold voltage, and
`
`there is a potential difference between the drain —— by
`
`the way, which is the drain in this diagram?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Is it above or below the —— the small arrow
`
`pointing to the right?
`
`A.
`
`I talked a little bit about this in my
`
`declaration.
`
`So, for example,
`
`footnote 1 on page 43 of my
`
`declaration, which is page 45 of 83 in the exhibit.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Yes. Okay.
`
`So one of ordinary skill in the art would
`
`understand that identification of the sources and
`
`drains transistor are dependent on the voltages
`
`provided by the transistors.
`
`This particular footnote is specific to the
`
`circuit I'm looking at
`
`in the declaration, but
`
`the
`
`same —— same answer applies to your question in
`
`Figure 4 of Lu.
`
`The source and drain depend on the
`
`potential supply to the transistor.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Can you tell me,
`
`in Figure 4,
`
`then,
`
`which is the source and which is the drain, or do you
`
`need to know what
`
`the potential is that's applied?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Looking at the transistor
`
`Page 15
`
`QEQ --
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Uh—huh.
`
`—— the labeling of the source and drain,
`
`since those terminals are interchangeable in a
`
`transistor, would depend on what
`
`the voltages are on
`
`the lines 1 and 2 that are labeled in that figure.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Did you discuss this Figure 4
`
`somewhere in your declaration?
`
`I
`
`think you did.
`
`You
`
`want
`
`to find the location?
`
`I'm looking at page 31,
`
`if that helps.
`
`A.
`
`What was the question?
`
`MR. HOSTENY: Why don't you read it back.
`
`(Record read by the reporter.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`On page 31 of the declaration,
`
`the Lu, bottom,
`
`I reference sensing and bitline
`
`precharge and half Vdd sensing and some other text.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`If I gather correctly,
`
`the point you
`
`were trying to make with respect to Lu is that it shows
`
`a way to get a voltage that you call Vdd divided by
`
`two?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS: Also in Lu, for example,
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
`Figure 1 and the associated discussion on the first
`
`page of Lu discusses precharging half Vdd the bitlines.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`In Figure 4, can you identify the bitlines
`
`for me.
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`Q.
`
`Is —— and do you see the note,
`
`the reference
`
`in Figure 4?
`
`It refers to fee 3 --
`
`the fee 3 clock
`
`controls the equalization device.
`
`See that?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Where are you reading?
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`The description of Figure 4,
`
`just below the drawing.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`YES.
`
`I see where it says fee 3
`
`clock controls the equalization device.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`So the line --
`
`the horizontal line --
`
`well,
`
`let me back up.
`
`What are the two horizontal lines in the
`
`drawing that are connected at the equalization device
`
`on the right—hand side?
`
`A.
`
`Those lines --
`
`1 and 2 are the labels --
`
`are
`
`the bitlines.
`
`Q.
`
`Bitlines.
`
`Okay.
`
`And the 1 and 2 you're
`
`referring to —— oh,
`
`I see them. Yes.
`
`Thank you.
`
`Okay.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
`So am I right that Lu,
`
`the author of the
`
`article,
`
`is —— is describing how one of the bitlines
`
`would be at Vdd?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS: Yes. And the text below
`
`Figure 4, ninth line from the bottom, at the end of the
`
`previous active cycle, one bitline half is at Vdd.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`O.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`I'm still looking. Which column are you in?
`
`Right below Figure 4.
`
`Got it.
`
`Ninth line from the bottom.
`
`I see. Okay. Okay.
`
`So it's one bitline half is at Vdd,
`
`the other
`
`is at zero. And then the equalization device is turned
`
`on?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Fee 3,
`
`that is,
`
`is used to turn on the
`
`equalization device?
`
`A.
`
`So before sensing, precharge of the bitline
`
`is initiated by switching on fee 3
`
`to turn on the
`
`equalization device QEO.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`And --
`
`and Lu says that shorts the two
`
`bitline halves together?
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`YES .
`
`And what he refers to as the precharge level
`
`he says is at nearly half Vdd?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes. That's what Lu says.
`
`And you're relying on what
`
`the Lu article
`
`says as part of your conclusion that Claim 1 of the
`
`Podlesny patent is obvious,
`
`based on Sukegawa and Lu?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Can you read back the first
`
`part of the question?
`
`MR. HOSTENY: She'll read the whole thing if
`
`you want.
`
`THE WITNESS: Okay.
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`If that doesn't work,
`
`then I'll
`
`restate it.
`
`THE WITNESS: Okay.
`
`(Record read by the reporter.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`So yes,
`
`the Lu article, not
`
`just Figure 4,
`
`but
`
`the entire article in combination
`
`with Sukegawa,
`
`yields the Podlesny patent.
`
`The 130
`
`patent,
`
`obvious.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. And —— and in Lu, you are relying on
`
`the fact that he shows a way to derive a —— what you
`
`call a precharge voltage,
`
`that is, Vdd divided by two?
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
`A.
`
`Yes. Again,
`
`for example,
`
`in Figure 1 of Lu,
`
`there's a voltage called Vref, and in Column 1 or the
`
`first column of Lu, on the same page,
`
`the left—hand
`
`side,
`
`the discussion of precharging to half Vdd, Vdd
`
`over two is another example precharging in Lu.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Okay. Claim 1 of the Podlesny patent
`
`requires a constant called K, does it not?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`All right.
`
`In column —— or in Claim 1,
`
`the last element
`
`K is a precharging voltage factor.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. And —— and the claim there refers to
`
`two buses.
`
`One is a differential bus, and the other is
`
`a differential data bus?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`The claim talks about a differential
`
`bus and a differential data bus.
`
`Q.
`
`And they both have to be precharged,
`
`according to Claim 1?
`
`A.
`
`The last element of Claim 1 says,
`
`"Wherein
`
`the differential bus and the differential data bus are
`
`precharged to a voltage.”
`
`O.
`
`Okay. Does --
`
`does Lu disclose K?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Specifically, what —— what Claim 1 calls the
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
`precharging voltage factor.
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same objection.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`So the last element of Claim 1,
`
`says,
`
`"a voltage Vpr between Vdd and ground,
`
`where Vpr
`
`equals K times Vdd,
`
`and K is a precharging voltage
`
`factor,
`
`Lu discloses K being between Vdd and ground.
`
`So yes, Lu discloses this.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q. Where, specifically?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection.
`
`Form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`For example,
`
`on Column 1 of Lu,
`
`the fourth --
`
`fifth line from the top of the second
`
`paragraph,
`
`the bitlines are precharged to a reference
`
`voltage approximately equal
`
`to Vdd over two,
`
`which I
`
`would take to mean a voltage between Vdd and ground,
`
`where that voltage would be K times Vdd or where K is a
`
`precharging voltage factor.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`I'm sorry.
`
`I'm not seeing voltage factor in
`
`there.
`
`Can you be more specific?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q. Well,
`
`let me be specific.
`
`I'll read the
`
`sentence. First column,
`
`"The bitlines are precharged
`
`to a reference voltage approximately equal
`
`to Vdd
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`divided by two, which can be obtained from a voltage
`
`regulator, as suggested by Foss and Harland, or by
`
`shorting two bitline halves after restoring the
`
`Page 21
`
`signal."
`
`correct?
`
`So he refers to two ways of precharging;
`
`A.
`
`In the sentence you just read, yes,
`
`the
`
`bitlines can be precharged to a voltage of
`
`approximately Vdd over two from a regulated voltage
`
`source or by shorting two bitlines together.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. And the technique shown in Figure 4
`
`is
`
`the shorting of two bitlines together;
`
`is that right?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I believe so. Yes.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`O.
`
`Other than referring to the voltage regulator
`
`as suggested by Foss and Harland, and I
`
`think —— and I
`
`think he refers to a —— does he refer to a Note 3?
`
`Yes, he does.
`
`Other than referring to using a voltage
`
`regulator by —— suggested by Foss and Harland, does he
`
`otherwise describe a voltage regulator?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I don't recall if voltage
`
`regulator's mentioned in any other place in the paper.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 22
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`How do you know that —— well, let's back up.
`
`In the manner shown in Figure 4,
`
`the shorting
`
`of the bitlines,
`
`is there a K, a precharged voltage --
`
`precharging voltage factor in Figure 4?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`I'm going to object to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`In Figure 4,
`
`the bitlines are
`
`precharged is nearly half Vdd, which I would take to
`
`mean K is nearly half of Vdd.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Are you saying,
`
`then,
`
`that there is a
`
`precharging voltage factor in both of the two methods
`
`suggested by Lu —— that is Foss and Harland —— and by
`
`shorting?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`So I'm saying that Figure 1,
`
`which, as discussed in Column 1,
`
`in the first column,
`
`in the second paragraph, under the introduction and
`
`second sentence was one of the most widely used
`
`variants to precharge the bitlines.
`
`And then it goes on to discuss pre charging
`
`the bitlines to approximately Vdd over two. And then
`
`with regard to Figure 4,
`
`the precharging is also to a
`
`voltage of nearly Vdd over two as discussed in the text
`
`underneath Figure 4 on the second page of Lu.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 23
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`You used the words "nearly half Vdd."
`
`Is
`
`that correct?
`
`A.
`
`The paper uses the words "nearly half Vdd"
`
`in
`
`the third sentence from the bottom there, underneath
`
`Figure 4.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you see in Claim 1 of the Podlesny patent
`
`that there is a reference in line 16, Column 4 --
`
`there's a little typo there —— where it says the two
`
`buses are precharged to a voltage Vpr?
`
`A.
`
`I see wherein the differential bus and the
`
`differential data bus are precharged —— precharged to a
`
`voltage, Vpr. Yes.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Do you see a Vpr
`
`in Figure 4 of Lu?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I do not see Vpr
`
`in Figure 4.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Go back to Figure 1 of Lu. Does that
`
`graph show Vdd?
`
`A.
`
`It looks like —— and I'm unsure, but Vdd in
`
`Figure 1
`
`is either 10 volts or 12 volts, but
`
`the
`
`specific value of Vdd isn't listed in Figure 1.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Is —— is there a line which represents
`
`its value? One of those lines?
`
`A.
`
`Vdd isn't plotted in Figure 1.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Because those are all —— those lines
`
`all repre
`
`sent voltages varying over a very short period
`
`Page 24
`
`of time;
`
`correct?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. HO
`
`STENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Well,
`
`in my world, 100 nanoseconds is pretty
`
`short.
`
`P
`
`erhaps not
`
`in yours.
`
`Sorry.
`
`Those —— that's a graph of —— of —— of
`
`voltages
`
`—— various voltages over time; right?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. What's bitline floating?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form. And relevance.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Is that term mentioned in the
`
`Lu paper
`
`some place?
`
`BY MR. HO
`
`STENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Might be. Let me back up before we answer
`
`that ques
`
`tion.
`
`When —— when you were working on your
`
`analysis,
`
`you had available to you the Podlesny patent,
`
`the Sukegawa patent,
`
`the Watanabe patent,
`
`the Lu
`
`article,
`
`and Hardee; correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`Therefore, you were able to look, for
`
`example,
`
`at Claim 1 of the Podlesny patent and then
`
`study the
`
`other references to see if they disclosed
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`elements of Claim 1;
`
`correct?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Objection to form.
`
`Relevance.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`YES.
`
`I
`
`looked at those
`
`Page 25
`
`references when doing my analysis.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. And,
`
`I mean,
`
`did you have them side by
`
`side on the same table,
`
`all available to you at the
`
`same time,
`
`in other words?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`So you could look at Claim 1 of
`
`Podlesny and see,
`
`for example,
`
`the first element,
`
`two
`
`bus drivers.
`
`And then could you go look at Sukegawa
`
`and say,
`
`Sukegawa's got
`
`two bus drivers.
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`I identified the two bus drivers on
`
`page 18 of 83 of my declaration,
`
`Exhibit 1002.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Why do we have four digit numbers,
`
`but
`
`whatever.
`
`Okay. And
`
`similarly,
`
`you could work your
`
`way
`
`through each of the other subparagraphs of —
`
`of
`
`Claim 1 and then look at the other references --
`
`Watanabe, Sukegawa,
`
`Lu,
`
`or Hardee --
`
`to see whether
`
`they disclosed each of those limitations as well?
`
`A.
`
`In my declaration,
`
`I have a table that
`
`discusses the disclosure of Claim 1.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`So Claim 1 was essentially the
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`guideline of what you had to look for in the other
`
`references?
`
`Page 26
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I don't know if I would use the
`
`term "guideline," but yes,
`
`I
`
`looked at Claim 1.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. All right.
`
`Sukegawa —— that's --
`
`well, let's go back. We didn't finish up something on
`
`Lu.
`
`I had asked you what bitline floating was,
`
`and I said it might be mentioned in Lu. And,
`
`in fact,
`
`it is.
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`I'm sorry. Was that a question?
`
`Can I have that read back?
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`I will give you the question
`
`again.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Take your time to look at Lu, but my question
`
`is: What is bitline floating?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection. Relevance. And
`
`foundation.
`
`I'll also add scope. Outside the scope of
`
`direct.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`(Witness reviewing document.)
`
`So I see the term on the top of the last page
`
`in the left—hand column.
`
`So just with a very cursory
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`review of the paper related to that term,
`
`I would take
`
`it to mean that the sense amplifier is turned off so
`
`that the bitlines are not actively driven to Vdd and
`
`Page 27
`
`ground.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`In the upper bitline in Figure 4, what
`
`will make Vdd remain constant?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same objections.
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Let me rephrase that.
`
`It could
`
`be better.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Is there anything shown in Figure 4 that
`
`ensures that Vdd on the upper bitline will remain
`
`constant?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same objections.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`If the upper bitline, which is
`
`labeled "1" in the figure,
`
`is at Vdd, and the lower
`
`bitline, which is labeled "2" in the figure is at
`
`ground,
`
`then the sense amplifier consisting of
`
`transistors Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 will actively pull those
`
`lines 1 and 2
`
`to Vdd and ground as long as the sense
`
`amplifier is active and the fee 2 switches are on.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Fee 2?
`
`I'm looking for it.
`
`Pardon me.
`
`Those switches --
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Q.
`
`I see it.
`
`I got
`
`them. Okay.
`
`So the sense amplifier needs to be active and
`
`the fee 2 switches,
`
`those are Q7 and Q8,
`
`is that what
`
`Page 28
`
`you're saying, need to be on?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`Q.
`
`If they are not on and the sense amplifier is
`
`not active,
`
`is there anything that maintains the value
`
`of Vdd —— of the bitline above at Vdd 2 —— I'm sorry.
`
`Let me rephrase that. That's terrible.
`
`If the —— if fee 2,
`
`that is, Q7 and Q8, are
`
`not on, and the sense amplifier is not active,
`
`is there
`
`anything maintaining the value of the upper bitline at
`
`Vdd?
`
`scope.
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form. Outside the
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`If the bitline isn't actively
`
`driven, it will be floating.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`How much can it float?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form. Outside the
`
`scope.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I don't know how to answer that
`
`question.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`How about —— how about a quality of
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`Page 29
`
`life answer instead of a quantity?
`
`Is there some rough approximation you can
`
`make or is it simply not possible to tell?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same objections.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`So in the operation of the
`
`DRAM,
`
`the bitlines are actively driven to Vdd and
`
`ground so that the data can be read out.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Uh—huh.
`
`After the data is read out,
`
`they remain --
`
`the data remains there until the next read.
`
`In other
`
`words,
`
`they remain precharged to Vdd and ground.
`
`As described in Lu, before you do another
`
`read, you shut off the sense amp,
`
`and you short the two
`
`bitlines together to precharge to Vdd over two.
`
`Then
`
`you read the data out.
`
`So long periods of time where the bitlines
`
`are floating or they change value really are not a
`
`concern in a practical circuit.
`
`Q.
`
`Can you tell me whether you agree or disagree
`
`with Lu's comment at the top of page 454 about a longer
`
`period of bitline floating being a drawback?
`
`MR. PARK: Objection to form. Outside the
`
`scope.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I do agree that a longer period
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`Page 30
`
`of bitline floating can be troublesome.
`
`I'll take a
`
`look on the previous page to see what specific
`
`situations where they would, perhaps, float the
`
`bitlines.
`
`I believe, again, after a cursory review,
`
`that during this time frame, which is the early to
`
`mid—80s,
`
`that NMOS DRAMs —— so NMOS means only
`
`end—channel transistors are used —— were still common.
`
`And in that situation, a lot of this discussion is
`
`geared towards NMOS DRAMs, which don't have the PMOS
`
`transistor to actively pull up the bitline to Vdd, and
`
`it's —— it clearly says in the second from the last
`
`page of Lu in the second —— third paragraph down, "In
`
`CMOS DRAMs,
`
`therefore, half Vdd bitline sensing has
`
`none of the disadvantages" --
`
`Q.
`
`Let me interrupt. Where are you reading?
`
`I'll follow you.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`It's the --
`
`Oh,
`
`I see.
`
`I'm with you now.
`
`I see the
`
`paragraph.
`
`Continue.
`
`A.
`
`—— "which it has when used in NMOS DRAMs."
`
`And I believe that the disadvantages are discussed
`
`below. And, again, after a cursory review of this
`
`material,
`
`I believe that's likely related to the fact
`
`www.Veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`
`Page 31
`
`that in NMOS DRAMs,
`
`there isn't a PMOS device to
`
`actively drive one of the bitlines to Vdd.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. Taking a look back at Figure 4 for a
`
`moment, let's —— let me ask you to assume the signal
`
`is
`
`present on fee 3, and the two bitlines have been
`
`shorted together; so there's a voltage which Lu says is
`
`nearly half Vdd.
`
`Under those circumstances, are those bitlines
`
`floating?
`
`MR.
`
`PARK: Objection to form.
`
`Outside the
`
`scope. And relevance.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I believe what
`
`the author, Lu,
`
`is talking about when he refers to bitline floating is
`
`the time prior to a read or prior to doing a precharge
`
`where the bitlines aren't actively driven by the sense
`
`amp. We only do the precharge and short the two lines
`
`together to precharge to Vdd over two or nearly Vdd
`
`over two immediately prior to reading or sensing the
`
`DRAM memory.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Is there —— is there a period of time in
`
`there where the bitlines are floating --
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same --
`
`MR. HOSTENY:
`
`—— at nearly half Vdd?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same objections.
`
`1O
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wnNwLVerfiexLcon1
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`

`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I wouldn't use the term
`
`Page 32
`
`"floating."
`
`I would use the term,
`
`they're shorted
`
`together to precharge the bitlines to nearly half Vdd
`
`over two.
`
`So one bitline is shorted to the second
`
`bitline, and they're tied together, not floating, as
`
`what is indicated in the text where one bitline isn't
`
`tied to anything.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`Once they are tied together and they are at
`
`nearly half Vdd,
`
`is there anything preventing a
`
`variation in nearly half Vdd?
`
`Can it vary?
`
`MR. PARK:
`
`Same objections.
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Immediately after precharging
`
`the bitlines,
`
`the sense amplifier is fired —— well,
`
`prior to that,
`
`the DRAM memory row is opened,
`
`information is placed on the bitlines, and the DRAM
`
`sense amps are fired to read the memory.
`
`BY MR. HOSTENY:
`
`Q.
`
`You said immediately —— I
`
`think you said
`
`immediately after they're precharged,
`
`the sense amp is
`
`activated?
`
`A.
`
`Immediately after the bits have been
`
`precharged --
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`1O
`
`11

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket