throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 32
`Date: April 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-01508 Case IPR2015-016101
`Patent 6,542,076 B1
`_______________
`
`Before DAVID C. MCKONE, STACEY G. WHITE and BETH Z. SHAW,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WHITE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Lifting Stay of Ex Parte Reexamination No. 90/013,302
`35 U.S.C. § 315(d) and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.3, 42.122(a)
`
`1 This Decision addresses the same issues in the above-identified cases. Therefore,
`we exercise our discretion to issue one Decision to be entered in each of the
`identified cases. The parties are not authorized to use this style of case caption.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2015-01508 Case IPR2015-01610
`Patent 6,542,076 B1
`
`
`The panel stayed Ex Parte Reexamination No. 90/013,302 (“302 Reexam”),
`the co-pending ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,542,076 B1 (“the ’076
`patent”), the patent challenged in IPR2015-01508 and IPR2015-01610. IPR2015-
`01508 Paper 24, IPR2015-01610 Paper 16. Final Written Decisions have been
`issued holding that Nissan North America, Inc., has shown claims 3, 20, 65, 73, 93,
`103, 104, 108 and 205 (IPR2015-01508 Paper 31, 39) of the ’076 patent to be
`unpatentable and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., has shown claims 3, 18, 65,
`67, 68, 70, 73, 91, 94, 96, 103, 110, 116, 119, 120, and 205 (IPR2015-01613
`Paper 21, 25) and of the ’076 patent to be unpatentable.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d)(2), a party dissatisfied with a final decision of
`the Board must file its request for rehearing within 30 days. The 30-day deadline
`for filing a request for rehearing has passed, and neither party has filed such a
`request. In addition, no party has filed a notice appeal as required by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 142 and 37 C.F.R. §§ 90.2(a) and 90.3. Accordingly, it is now appropriate to lift
`the stay of Reexamination Control No. 90/013,302
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the stay of Reexamination 90/013,302, is hereby lifted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that all time periods in Reexamination 90/013,302
`are hereby restarted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2015-01508 Case IPR2015-01610
`Patent 6,542,076 B1
`
`
`
`PETITIONER
`Clay Holloway
`Alton L. Absher III
`Shayne E. O’Reilly
`Mitchell G. Stockwell
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`cholloway@kilpatricktownsend.com
`aabsher@kilpatricktownsend.com
`soreilly@kilpatricktownsend.com
`mstockwell@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`Raymond Joao
`rayjoao@optonline.net
`
`René A. Vazquez
`HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC
`rvazquez@hgdlawfirm.com
`PG_JCMS@hgdlawfirm.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket