throbber
lllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllll
`
`11800571266411
`
`United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,712,664
`
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Jan. 27, 1998
`Reddy
`
`[54] SHARED MEMORY GRAPHICS
`ACCELERATOR SYSTEM
`
`5,392,393
`5,396,586
`5,537,128
`
`2.11995 Dealing .. 3951162
`311995 VanAkw
`3951141
`
`711996 Keene e191.
`3451200
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Chitnmjan N. Roddy, Milpitas, Calif.
`
`FOREIGN PM'ENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[73] Assignee: Alliance Semiconductor Corporation,
`San Jose, Calif.
`
`1211293
`
`811992
`
`Japan.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`[21] Appl. No; 136,553
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Oct. 14, 1993
`
`Int. Cl.6.. G09G 5100
`[51]
`[52] US. Cl. ....................... 3451200; 3451201: 3951508;
`3951519
`3451133. 132,
`[58] Field of Search
`3451189—191, 204, 203, 200, 201; 3951162,
`164, 166, 185, 375, 129. 725, 141, 508,
`519; 3481584, 441, 536; 3651200
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUNIENTS
`
`34512101
`311980
`4,191,956
`3651200
`4,228,528 1011980
`3451201
`4,812,836
`311989
`3451201
`4,816,815
`311989
`3451189
`4,951,232
`811990
`3481441
`4,956,703
`911990
`.. 3951375
`5,031,092
`"111991
`.. 3651200
`5,083,294
`111992
`. 3451133
`5,202,962
`411993
`.. 3481536
`5,258,843
`1111993
`. 3481584
`5,293,540
`311994
`3651200
`5,297,148
`311994
`3951129
`5,303,334
`411994
`3451200
`5,319,388
`611994
`3951162
`5,321,806
`611994
`3451201
`5,363,500 1111994
`5,386,573
`111995 Okamoto ................................ 3951725
`
`
`
`TMS34010 User’s Guide. Texas Instruments. pp.
`through 1—7, 1986.
`IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 35(1A):45—46, Jun.
`1992.
`"IRS—80 Color Computer Technical Reference
`Tandy.
`Manual” pp. 17-21, 1981.
`
`1—5
`
`Primary Examine-Steven Saras
`Attorney Agent, or Firm—Limbach 8r. Limbach L.L.P.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A shared memory graphics accelerator systu that provides
`graphics display data to a display includes a central pro-
`cessing unit for generating graphics display data and graph-
`ics commands for processing the display data. An integrated
`graphics display memory element includes both a graphics
`accelemwr connected to receive display data and graphics
`commands from the central processing unit and an on-chip
`frame buffer memory element. The on-chip fi'ame buffer
`memory element is connected to receive display data from
`the graphics accelerator via a display data distribution bus.
`An off-chip frame bufi‘ea' memory element is also connected
`to the display data distribution has to receive display data
`from the graphics accelerator. The graphics accelerator
`scleaively distributes display data to the on-dn'p frame
`heifer memory element and to the inf-chip frame bufl’er
`memory element based on predetermined display data dis-
`tribution criteria.
`
`3 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`1123
`
`“5
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 7
`Page 1 of 7
`
`HTC-LG-SAMSUNG EXHIBIT 1026
`HTC-LG-SAMSUNG EXHIBIT 1026
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 27, 1993
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,712,664
`
`22
`
`14
`
`(DRAM)
`
`GRAHflCS
`ACCELERATOR
`(GXX)
`
`FRAME
`BUFFER
`
`FIG. 1
`
`(PRIOR ART)
`
`
`
`FIG. 2
`
`Page 2 of 7
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 27, 1998
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,712,664
`
`
`
`FIG. 3
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 7
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`5,712,664
`
`1
`SHARED MEMORY GRAPHICS
`ACCELERATOR SYSTEM
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE EVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates to the visual display of a
`computer graphics image and, in partiwlar. to a graphics
`display system that integrates both a graphics accelerator
`engine and apoxtion of the graphics frame bulfer memory on
`the same monolithic chip.
`2. Discussion of the Prior Art
`
`A video graphics system typically uses either VRAM or
`DRAM frame bulfers to store the pixel display data utilized
`in displaying a graphics or video image on a display element
`such as a CRT.
`
`AVRAM frame bulfer includes two ports that are avail-
`able for the pixel data to flow from the memory to the
`display. One port is known as the serial port and is totally
`dedicated to refreshing the display screen image. The other
`port is a random access port that is used for receiving pixel
`updates generated by a CPU or a graphics accelerator
`engine. A typical VRAM arrangement allocates 99% of the
`available bandwidth to the random port thereby allowing the
`system to display fast moving objects and to support Large
`display CRTs.
`However, in a DRAM-based video system. the pixel data
`updates and the screen refresh data contend for a single
`frame buffer memory port. This contention reduces the
`amount of bandwidth available for pixel data updates by the
`CPU and the graphics engine, resulting in a lower perfor-
`mance graphics display system.
`However, in most applications. the DRAM solution is
`preferable to the VRAM solution at the expense of lower
`performance, because DRAMs are cheaper than V'RAMs.
`FIG. 1 showa a conventional graphics display system 10
`wherein a CPU 12 writes pixel display data on data bus 11
`to be displayed on the CKI‘ screen 14 through a graphics
`accelerator (GXX) 16 onto a DRAM frame bufl’er 18 via
`data bus 19. The CPU 12 also provides certain higher: level
`graphics command signals 20 to the graphics accelerator 16
`to manipulate the display data stored in the DRAM frame
`butter 18.
`
`The graphics accelerator 16 retrieves display data from
`the frame bufer 18 via data bus 19 utilizing reference
`address bus 21. processes the retrieved display data based on
`the CPU command signals 20 and writes the new pixel data
`back to the frame bufier 18.
`
`The pixel data is displayed on the CRT 14 through a
`random access memory digital-to-analog converter
`(RAMDAC) 22 that receives the data via a data display bus
`24
`
`The graphics accelerator 16 also reads display data from
`the frame buifer 18 via data bus 19 and sends it to the
`RAMDAC 22 via the data display bus 24 to meet the
`periodic refresh requirements of the CRT display 14.
`Thus. as illustrated in FIG. 1, the bandwidth of the data
`bus 19 is shared by three functions: display refresh, CPU
`display data update, and graphics accelerator display
`manipulation. As the display size (i.e., the number of pixels
`to be displayed on the CKI‘ screen 14) increases, the display
`updates and display manipulation functions are reduced
`because of the bandwidth limitations of the data bus 19
`
`caused by the fixed refresh requirements of the CRT 14.
`While these limitations can be addressed by increasing the
`data bus width ra- by increasing its speed, both of these
`
`2
`limitations.
`solutions have either physical or practical
`Increasing the bus width increases the silicon area and the
`package pin count. Increasing the speed of the bus requires
`utilization of more complex silicon process technology.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE JNVENTION
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`The present invention provides a graphics display system
`that enhances performance by integrating a portion of the
`frame butter storage space and the graphics accelerator
`engine on the same chip while at the same time maintaining
`the flexibility to expand the frame butter size as needed.
`Generally.
`the present
`invention provides a shared
`memory graphics accelerator system that provides display
`data to a display element. The shared memory graphics
`accelerator system includes a central processing unit that
`generates both display data and graphics commands for
`processing the display data. An integrated graphics display
`memory element includes both a graphics accelerator that
`receives display data and graphics commands from the
`central processing unit and an on-chip frame buffer memory
`element that is connected to receive display data from the
`graphics accelerator via a display data distribution bus. An
`off-chip frame bufier memory element is also connected to
`the data distribution bus to receive display data from the
`graphics accelerator. The graphics accelerator selectively
`distributes the display data to the on-chip memory element
`and to the elf—chip memory element based on predefined
`display data distribution criteria.
`The above-described integrated solution increases the
`performance of the graphics display system because display
`data retrieval from the on—chip frame boiler is much faster
`than from an external frame buffer and the DRAM timing
`constraints are reduced, thus adricving improved system
`performance. This integrated solution also allows the dis-
`play memory size to be expanded by adding external
`memory so that large displays can be accommodated on an
`as-needed basis. Also. the frame bulfer space can be dis-
`n-ibnted among several integrated solutions, thereby increas-
`ing both the display bandwidth and the parallel processing
`capability between the CRT display and the CPU.
`A better understanding of the features and advantages of
`the present invention will be obtained by reference to the
`following detailed descriptiou and accompanying drawings
`which set forth an illustrative embodiment in which the
`principals of the invention are utilized.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a conventional
`graphics subsystem.
`FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a shared
`memory graphics accelerator system in accordance with the
`present invention.
`FIG. 3 is a sd'iematic diagram illusn'ating a shared
`memory graphics accelerator system in accordance with the
`present invention in a distributed display arrangement.
`FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a shared
`memory graphics accelerator system in accordance with the
`present invention but with no expansion memory.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`I55
`
`The present invention addresses the data bus bandwidth
`problem common to conventional DRAM-based graphics
`display systems by integrating a portion of the display data
`frame buffer memory space on the graphics accelerator chip
`
`Page 4 of 7
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`5,712,664
`
`3
`
`and thereby allowing simultaneous access to both on-chip
`DRAM frame buffer data and off-chip DRAM flame bufer
`data while maintaining the flexibility to increase the display
`data memory size externally to meet a variety of CRT
`display size requirements.
`FIG. 2 shows a shared memory graphics accelerator
`system 100 that includes a central processing unit (CPU)
`102 that sends pixol display data via addressldata bus 104
`and graphics command signals via a control bus 106 to a
`single integrated graphics display memory (IGDM) 108.
`Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the bus widths
`are CPU-dependent.
`The integrated graphics display memory element 108
`includes a graphics accelerator (GXX) 110 that receives the
`pixel display data and distributes it between an on—chip
`DRAM frame bulfer 112 and an off-chip DRAM frame
`buffer 114 via a display data distribution bus 120. using a
`common address bus 115. The data distribution between
`on-chip memory 112 and off-chip memory 114 is based upon
`user defined criteria loaded onto the integrated graphics
`display memory element 108 during power-up. This infora
`mation can be stored either in the CPU hard disk or in a
`boot-up EPROM. This distribution of the pixel display data
`is optimized for maximum CPU updates onto the on—chip
`display butler DRAM 112 and the ofi-chip DRAM 114- and,
`at the same time. for supporting a maximum display size
`refresh on the CRT display 116.
`By splitting the display frame buffer into an (JD-Chip
`DRAM portion 112 and an off-chip DRAM portion 114. the
`graphics accelerator engine 110 can double the pixel read
`data to a RAMDAC 118 by simultaneously accessing
`on-chip and olf—chip frame buffer display data and multi~
`plexing it onto the distributed data bus 120 using control
`signals 121. A FIFO memory 122 provides a buffer between
`the RAMDAC 113 which requires continuous display data
`input and the distributed data bus 120. which is shared for:
`display update. display manipulate and display refresh
`operations.
`It is also possible for the graphics accelerator engine 110
`to read on-chip DRAM 112 at a much faster rate that it can
`read ofi-chip DRAM 114. thereby making more CPU 102
`update time available for on-chip DRAM 112. This increase
`in CPU update bandwidth can. for example, be translated
`into a faster moving image portion which can be stored onto
`the on-chip DRAM 112 and a slower moving portion which
`can be stored onto the oil-chip DRAM 114. Those skilled in
`the art will appreciate that this distribution of the load can be
`implemented many different ways between the on—chip
`DRAM 112 and the off—clup DRAM 114 to meet
`the
`performance requirements of the total graphics display sys-
`tern.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`Those skilled in the artwill also appreciate that successful
`implementation of the integrated graphics display memory
`element 103 described above requires that
`the on—chip
`DRAM frame butler 112 have substantially difierent char-
`acteristics than a monolithic DRAM used for data storage.
`
`55
`
`A typical monolithic DRAM requires a 200 nsec. refresh
`cycle every 15.6 nsec.. which is equivalent to a 1.28%
`refresh overhead. During this refresh time, no data may he
`read from the DRAM; the time is used primarily for refresh—
`ing the DRAM cell data. This retresh overhead time needs
`to be constant (or as small as possible) with increasing chip
`density. Unfortunately. chip power dissipation must be
`increased with increasing chip density in order to maintain
`constant overhead.
`
`For the integrated graphics display memory element 108,
`the on—chip DRAM frame buffer memory 112. is imple-
`
`4
`mented with substantially increased refresh frequency
`(much less than 15.6 nsec.) to reduce the on-chip power
`dissipation. For example. a 16 Mbit on-chip DRAM frame
`buffer memory 112 could have one 200 nsec. refresh cycle
`every 2 nsec., which translates to a l{l% refresh overhead
`While this refresh overhead is a significant portion of the
`total available bandwidth. with improved on—chip DRAM
`access time resulting from integration of the DRAM 112
`with the graphics accellerator 110, overall system perfor-
`mance is improved significantly. Those skilled in the art will
`appreciate that, as more of the system sub-blocks. such as
`the RAMDAC 118, are integrated with the graphics accel-
`erator 110 and the Oil-chip DRAM frame buffer memory
`112.
`the refresh overhead is optimized with respect to
`improved on-chip DRAM access time and increaSed on-chip
`power dissipation to provide improved total system perfor—
`mance. Furthemacre, increased refresh frequency permits
`smaller memory storage cell capacitance which reduces total
`chip size.
`Thus. the on-chip DRAM 112 has a substantially higher
`refresh frequency than the monolithic elf—chip DRAM 114.
`The integrated graphics display memory element 108
`includes means for supporting the multiple refresh fre-
`quency requirements of the on-chip DRAM 112 and the
`off-chip DRAM 114.
`In some low power applications, average power dissipa-
`tion can be reduced by increasing both the memory cell size
`and the refresh interval. Another way to reduce power is to
`increase the number of DRAM sense amplifiers, but this
`solution increases chip size.
`Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the FIG. 2
`configuration of system 100 can be implemented utilizing
`available integrated circuit technology.
`FIG. 3 shows two integrated graphics display memory
`elements (IGDM) 300 and 302 connected in parallel
`between a display data output has 304 and RAMDAC 306
`and to CPU 30’? via an address and data bus 308, without any
`external memory. to display a contiguous image on the CRT
`screen 310 using a frame butter DRAM 312 on-chip to
`integrated graphics display element 300 and a frame buifer
`DRAM 314 on-chip to integrated graphics display element
`302. Thus.
`the two integrated graphics display memory
`elements 300 and 302, provide the total frame buffer storage
`space for pixel display data to be displayed on the CRT
`screen 310. Each of integrated graphics display memory
`elements 300 and 302 can receive CPU instructions via the
`CPU control bus 316 and can display portions of the
`required image on the CRT screen 310. Also the two
`integrated graphics display memory elements 300 and 302
`can communicate with each other via the control signal bus
`318 and addressldatza path 320 to split the image or redis-
`tribute the load among themselves without CPU
`intervention.
`thereby increasing the total system perfor-
`mance.
`
`One possible example of load sharing in the environment
`of the FIG. 3 system could arise when one integrated
`graphics display memory element works on even lines of the
`CRT display while the other integrated graphics display
`memory element is drawing odd lines on the CRT screen
`310. Those skilled in the art will recognize that it is also
`possible to subdivide the CRT screen 310 even further into
`multiple small sections with each section being serviced by
`a corresponding integrated graphics display memory ele—
`ment; these integrated graphics display memory elements
`can be cascaded to display a contiguous image on the CRT
`screen 310.
`
`Page 5 of 7
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`5,712,664
`
`5
`
`It is well knovvn that, because the number of pixels on a
`CRI‘ screen is smaller than the frame buffer size due to the
`aspect ratio of the CRT screen and the binary nature of the
`memory increments. there are always extra bits left in the
`frame buffer that are unused by the CRT display. During
`power-up of either the FIG. 2. or the FIG. 3 system. the
`graphics accelerator engine can check the entire frame buifer
`storage space for any failed bits and then map these failed
`bits onto the excess memory space available in the frame
`butler. This becomes important since. as the combined
`graphics accelerator and onwchip DRAM die size increases.
`the number of fully functional chips drops dramatically. The
`excess space needed to repair the faulty frame butler bits can
`be allocated from the on-ehip frame buffer DRAM so that
`the access delay penalty occurring during the faulty bit
`access can be reduced, since the on-chip DRAM is much
`faster than oE-chip DRAM. This fall bit feature can be
`implemented utilizing techniques disclosed in the following
`two co-pending and commonly-assigned applications: (1)
`US. Ser. No. 081041.909. filed Apr. 2. 1990 (Issue Fee has
`been paid) and (2) U.S. Ser. No. 08!083,198. filed Jun. 25,
`1993. Both of these applications are hereby incorporated by
`reference.
`'
`As shown in FIG. 4. for smaller display sizes, a single
`integrated graphics display memory element without any
`external memory can be used initially. As the display size
`requirements increase. external display memory can be
`added in conjunction with an on-chip display memory
`availability. As described above, it is also possible to connect
`multiple integrated graphics display memory elements in
`parallel to meet the display size requirements and. at the
`same time, to exewte multiple instructions in parallel,
`thereby increasing the CRT display performance.
`It should be understood that various alternatives to the
`embodiment of the invention described herein may be
`employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the
`following claims define the scope of the invention and that
`storms and methods within the scope of these claims and
`their equivalents be covered thereby.
`What is claimed is:
`1. An integrated graphics display memory element utiliz-
`able in a graphics accelerator system that provides graphics
`display data to a display element for display thereby,
`wherein the graphics accelerator system includes a central
`processing unit that generates graphics display data and
`graphics commands for processing graphics display data and
`an off-chip frame butler memory element having a first
`refresh frequency requirement, the integrated graphics dis-
`play memory element comprising:
`a graphics accelerator that can be connected to receive
`graphics display data and graphics cormnands from the
`central processing unitvia a CPU data bus and a control
`signal bus. respectively;
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`SD
`
`6
`a data distribution bus connected to the graphics accel—
`orator:
`
`an on-chip frame buffer memory element connected to the
`data distribution bus ferreceiving graphics display data
`from the graphics accelerator;
`an output data storage element connected to the data
`distribution bus for receiving graphics display data
`from the graphics accelerator and the on-chip frame
`bufier memory element as output diSplay data,
`the elf-drip frame buffer memory element being connect-
`able to the data distribution bus for providing graphics
`display data to the output data storage element as
`output display data. and
`wherein the on-chip frame buffer memory element has a
`second refresh frequency requirement lower than the
`first refresh frequency of the elf-chip frame heifer
`element.
`2. An integrated graphics display memory element as in
`claim 1 and wherein the on-chip frame butler memory
`element has a cell size greater than the cell size of the
`ofi—chip frame buifer memory element.
`3. A shared memory graphics accelerator system that
`provides graphics display data to a display element for
`display thereby. the shared memory graphics accelerator
`system comprising:
`a central processing unit that generates graphics display
`data and graphics commands for processing graphics
`diSPhy data;
`that
`an integrated graphics display memory element
`includes both a graphics accelerator connected to
`receive graphics display data and graphics commands
`from the central processing unit and an on—chip frame
`butler memory element connected to receive graphics
`display data from the graphics accelerator via a display
`data distribution bus; and
`an ofl‘~chip frame buffer memory element connected to
`receive graphics display data from the graphics accel—
`orator via the data distribution bus;
`
`wherein the graphics accelerator selectively distributes
`display data to the on-chip frame buffer memory ele-
`ment and to the elf-chip frame buffer memory element
`based on pro-defined display data distribution criteria.
`and
`
`wherein the display data disuibution criteria are pre-
`defined such that the graphics accelerator selectively
`distributes display data corresponding to fast moving
`images to the on-chip frame butler memory element
`and display data corresponding to slowing moving
`images of the off~chip frame butter memory element.
`*****
`
`Page 6 of 7
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENTNO.
`
`: 5,712,654
`
`DATED
`
`: January 27, 1993
`
`INVENTOR(S): Chitranjan N. Reddy
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-indentitied patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby
`corrected as shown below:
`
`Claim 2,
`
`line 3, "greater" should be —~ lesser --.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Seventeenth Day of November, 1998
`
`Amen-
`
`604 W
`
`BRUCE LEHMAN
`
`AHFSNHQ Offir‘er
`
`(‘rmrmmimwr ref Pawn-'3' and Trademark.
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 7
`Page 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket