throbber
Paper No.
`Filed: April 13, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC Corporation,
`HTC America, Inc.,
`LG Electronics, Inc.,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01502
`Patent No. 7,542,045
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Objections to Patent Owner’s Exhibits
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioner1 submits the following
`
`objections to exhibits submitted by Patent Owner, Parthenon Unified Memory
`
`Architecture LLC. Petitioner’s objections apply equally to Patent Owner’s reliance
`
`on these exhibits in any subsequently-filed documents. These objections are
`
`timely, having been filed and served within five business days from when the
`
`exhibits were served on Petitioner.
`
`Exhibit 2004
`
`
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2004 under Rules 401-403 of the Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence on the ground that it is not relevant because Patent Owner never relied
`
`on this exhibit in its Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2005 under Rules 401-403 of the Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence. Patent Owner only cited one page of the several hundred pages of
`
`Exhibit 2005 in its Patent Owner’s Response. As such, these uncited pages lack
`
`relevance.
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`1 “Petitioner” refers collectively to HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., LG
`
`Electronics, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc.
`
` 1
`
`
`
`

`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2008 under Rule 802 of the Federal Rules of
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01502
`
`
`
`
`Evidence because the testimony and/or evidence in this exhibit constitutes
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /Allan M. Soobert/
`Allan M. Soobert
`Reg. No. 36,284
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`inadmissible hearsay.
`
`
`
`Dated: April 13, 2016
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on
`
`counsel a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s Objections to Patent
`
`Owner’s Exhibits by electronic means on the date below at the following address
`
`of record:
`
`Masood Anjom (manjom@azalaw.com)
`Alisa Lipski (alipski@azalaw.com)
`Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing P.C.
`1221 McKinney, Suite 3460
`Houston, TX 77010
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /Allan M. Soobert/
`Allan M. Soobert
`Reg. No. 36,284
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`Dated: April 13, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket