throbber
Kidney International, Vol. 65 (2004), pp. 2279–2289
`
`CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY – EPIDEMIOLOGY – CLINICAL TRIALS
`
`Oxidative stress and renal injury with intravenous iron in
`patients with chronic kidney disease
`
`RAJIV AGARWAL, NINA VASAVADA, NADINE G. SACHS, and SHAWN CHASE
`
`Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana;
`and Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
`
`Oxidative stress and renal injury with intravenous iron in pa-
`tients with chronic kidney disease.
`Background. Intravenous iron is widely prescribed in patients
`with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and can cause oxidative
`stress. The relationship of oxidative stress and renal injury in
`patients with CKD is unknown. Whether renal injury can occur
`at a time point when transferrin is incompletely saturated is also
`unclear.
`Methods. We conducted a randomized, open-label, parallel
`group trial to compare the oxidative stress induced by intra-
`venous administration of 100 mg iron sucrose over 5 minutes
`and its protection with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in 20 sub-
`jects with stage 3 or 4 CKD. Transferrin saturation was
`measured with urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, ox-
`idative stress by malondialdehyde (MDA) measurement by
`high-performance liquid chromatography, and renal
`injury
`by enzymuria and proteinuria. Reduced and oxidized glu-
`tathione and free radical scavengers as well as urinary monocyte
`chemoattractant protein-1 were also measured.
`Results. Parenteral iron increased plasma concentration and
`urinary excretion rate of MDA, a biomarker of lipid peroxida-
`tion, within 15 to 30 minutes of iron sucrose administration. This
`was accompanied by enzymuria and increase in proteinuria. In
`contrast, saturation of transferrin was not maximally seen until
`3 hours after the end of infusion. Oxidative stress, enzymuria
`and proteinuria were transient and were completely resolved in
`24 hours. NAC reduced acute generation of systemic oxidative
`stress but failed to abrogate proteinuria or enzymuria.
`Conclusion. Intravenous iron produces oxidative stress that
`is associated with transient proteinuria and tubular damage.
`The rapid production of oxidative stress even when transfer-
`rin is not completely saturation suggests free iron independent
`mechanism(s) to be operative in producing oxidative stress and
`transient renal injury. Long-term implications of these findings
`need further study.
`
`In the United States there are approximately 8 mil-
`lion individuals with moderate to severe chronic kid-
`
`Key words: Iron, anemia, malondialdehyde, oxidative stress, chronic
`kidney failure, randomized controlled trial.
`
`Received for publication October 25, 2003
`and in revised form November 22, 2003
`Accepted for publication December 22, 2003
`
`C(cid:1) 2004 by the International Society of Nephrology
`
`ney disease (CKD), not on dialysis [1]. Anemia sets in
`early during the course of renal disease, either as a re-
`sult of erythropoietin deficiency or due to insufficient ab-
`sorption of dietary iron [2]. Furthermore, a functional
`deficiency of iron may occur due to enhanced erythro-
`poiesis after therapy with recombinant human erythro-
`poietin that often necessitates therapy with intravenous
`iron [3]. The correction of anemia leads to improvement
`in morbidity, mortality, and quality of life [4]; however,
`potential toxicity due to the participation of elemen-
`tal iron in oxidation-reduction reactions has raised con-
`cern of potential risks of this commonly utilized therapy
`[5, 6].
`Oxidative stress plays an important role in the patho-
`genesis and progression of renal disease [7, 8]. Intra-
`venous iron has been shown to increase biologic markers
`of oxidative stress [9] in cell cultures [10], animal mod-
`els [11], and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on
`hemodialysis [12–14]. Intravenous administration of iron
`sucrose in dialysis patients results in an increase in total
`peroxide, free iron, and markers of lipid peroxidation,
`and is significantly improved with the antioxidant, vita-
`min E [15]. Whether patients with CKD not on dialy-
`sis have a similar increase in oxidative stress and, above
`all, renal injury upon exposure to intravenous iron is un-
`known. This knowledge is of critical importance because
`oxidative stress and renal injury may lead to an acceler-
`ated course of renal [7] and cardiovascular disease [16,
`17]. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the acute ox-
`idative stress imposed by iron can be reduced with an-
`tioxidant therapy. In this context, animal and human data
`demonstrate beneficial effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
`in models of oxidative stress such as contrast-induced
`acute renal failure [18].
`We hypothesized that in subjects with moderate to se-
`vere CKD, an infusion of intravenous iron would gen-
`erate oxidative stress and that this would cause tubular
`injury and increase in glomerular permeability. Further-
`more, the generation of oxidative stress, tubular injury,
`glomerular permeability, and renal inflammation would
`be mitigated by therapy with the antioxidant NAC.
`
`2279
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2011, p. 1
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01495
`
`

`
`2280
`
`Agarwal et al: Intravenous iron and oxidative stress
`
`METHODS
`Subjects
`Study participants were recruited from the Nephrol-
`ogy Clinic at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical
`Center. Subjects were at least 18 years in age, had an
`estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤ 60 mL/min
`by the six-component Modified Diet in Renal Disease
`(MDRD) Study formula [19] but were not on renal
`replacement therapy and had iron deficiency anemia.
`Anemia was defined as blood hemoglobin concentration
`below the 95th percentile in the NHANES evaluation
`[20]. Iron deficiency was defined using National Kidney
`Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative
`(NKF-K/DOQI) guidelines as having a serum ferritin
`concentration of <100 ng/mL or serum transferrin satu-
`ration of <20% [21]. Subjects were excluded if they were
`hypersensitive to iron sucrose or NAC, were an organ
`transplant recipient or received therapy with immuno-
`suppressive agents, used an investigational drug 1 month
`prior to study, or demonstrated the presence of active
`asthma, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), cancer,
`rheumatoid arthritis, alcoholism, or liver disease. Sub-
`jects were also excluded if they were anemic such that ery-
`throcyte transfusion was imminent (hemoglobin <8 g/dL,
`or active gastrointestinal bleeding), had acute renal fail-
`ure, defined as an increase in the baseline serum crea-
`tinine concentration of ≥0.5 mg/dL over 48 hours, were
`pregnant or breastfeeding, had received intravenous iron
`within 3 months of the study, demonstrated iron over-
`load (serum ferritin >800 ng/mL or transferrin satura-
`tion >50%), had anemia not caused by iron deficiency,
`had surgery or systemic or urinary tract infection within
`1 month of study, or a serum albumin <3.0 g/dL.
`The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review
`Board at Indiana University School of Medicine and the
`Research and Development Committee of the Richard
`L. Roudebush VA Medical Center. Written informed
`consent was obtained from each subject prior to study
`participation.
`
`Study design
`Subjects who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion crite-
`ria were assigned by a computer-generated randomized
`block randomization scheme to one of two open-label,
`1-week, parallel treatment arms: either no active in-
`tervention, or treatment with the antioxidant NAC
`(Mucomyst) (Apothecon, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA) at
`a dose of 600 mg twice a day. The allocation scheme was
`concealed from investigators until time of subject ran-
`domization. Oral iron supplements were stopped for the
`duration of the study.
`The trial design is illustrated in Figure 1. Subjects were
`requested to be fasting before all visits. During the ini-
`tial study period, baseline blood and urine was collected
`
`and assayed for biomarkers of lipid peroxidation [plasma
`and urine malondialdehyde (MDA)], substrate for lipid
`peroxidation (lipid panel), evaluation of iron deficiency
`anemia [complete blood count, iron, total iron bind-
`ing capacity (TIBC), ferritin], redox state [plasma and
`erythrocyte oxidized and reduced glutathione (GSSG,
`GSH)], free radical scavengers [erythrocyte superox-
`ide dismutase (red blood cell SOD) and glutathione
`peroxidase (GSHPx)], and markers of renal tubular
`and glomerular damage and/or inflammation [urinary
`monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), urine to-
`tal protein, and N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminidase (NAG)].
`Subjects then received an intravenous dose of iron su-
`crose (Venofer) (American Regent Laboratories, Inc.,
`Shirley, NY, USA) at a dose of 100 mg infused over
`5 minutes. Blood and urine collections were obtained at
`baseline, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 24 hours after iron dosing to
`assay for the above parameters. During the visits, the sub-
`jects completed the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life
`Short Form (KDQOL-SF, version 1.3). Subjects were ran-
`domized to take either no additional treatment or NAC
`600 mg twice a day for 1 week. The last dose of NAC was
`administered under direct supervision by the study nurse
`in the morning of the second infusion of intravenous iron.
`After 1 week, subjects had all study procedures repeated
`as on the initial study period. NAC-assigned subjects re-
`turned with remaining antioxidant doses to assess com-
`pliance. Subjects completed a KDQOL-SF modified to
`assess parameters over the 1-week intervening treatment
`period.
`
`Laboratory analysis
`Electrophoretic separation of transferrins. The iron
`forms of transferrin were separated using a urea poly-
`acrylamide gel (6% acrylamide gels with 6 mol/L urea)
`according to Williams, Evans, and Moreton [22]. This
`method separates transferrin into the apotransferrin,
`monoferric, and the diferric forms, according to their elec-
`trophoretic mobilities. Precipitation of transferrin from
`plasma was achieved through treatment with 2% 6,9-
`diamino-2-ethoxyacridine lactate monohydrate (Sigma
`Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and subsequent
`centrifugation before being applied to the gel to pre-
`cipitate all serum proteins but b and c globulins [23].
`Electrophoresis was performed using a Criterion mini-gel
`system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Fourteen plasma
`samples obtained from each subject over two visits were
`separated simultaneously on the same gel, along with con-
`trols of apotransferrin, monoferric transferrin(s), and di-
`ferric transferrin. Protein bands were visualized through
`staining with GelCode Blue stain reagent (Pierce,
`Rockford, IL, USA). Densitometric analysis was per-
`formed with a Gel Logic 100 apparatus and one-
`dimensional image analysis software (Kodak, Rochester,
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2011, p. 2
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01495
`
`

`
`Agarwal et al: Intravenous iron and oxidative stress
`
`2281
`
`Urine
`
`Single dose iron sucrose
`(100 mg/5 min IV push)
`
`Placebo group
`
`R
`
`Single dose iron sucrose
`(100 mg/5 min IV push)
`
`N-acetyl cysteine group
`(600 mg BID × 7d)
`
`Urine
`
`Fig. 1. Trial design. All patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) had baseline urine and blood draws followed by administration of iron sucrose.
`Blood and urine specimens were collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 24 hours after administration of the drug. Patients were then randomized to receive
`N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or nothing for 1 week in an open-label fashion. After 1 week, iron sucrose was again administered and tests performed as
`done at first visit.
`
`Urine
`
`NY, USA). Percent transferrin saturation was calculated
`as follows:
`Transferrin Saturation(%) =
`[Diferric transferrin+ (1/2 × monoferric transferrin(s))]
`[Apotransferrin + Monoferric transferrin(s)+ Diferric transferrin]
`Reduced and oxidized glutathione. Determination of
`reduced and oxidized glutathione concentrations was
`achieved through an isocratic high-performance liquid
`chromatography (HPLC) technique. Specimens were
`collected, processed, and analyzed as described by
`Paroni et al [24]. We modified the method by increas-
`ing the flow rate and changing the wash pattern of the
`column as described below.
`Briefly, the mobile phase consisted of 21 mmol/L pro-
`prionate buffer and acetonitrile, 95:5 (vol/vol) pumped
`at 2 mL/min. The column was a Merck LiChrospher
`RP-18, 5 l with guard placed in a column warmer
`◦
`set to 37
`C. Following three consecutive samples, the
`column was washed for 3 minutes with a solution of
`acetonitrile:methanol:water (55:25:20 vol/vol) followed
`by re-equilibration with mobile phase for 4 minutes.
`
`The chromatographic system consisted of a Hewlett-
`Packard Chromatographic Series 1100 autosampler and
`isocratic pump and Hewlett-Packard model 1046A pro-
`grammable fluorescence detector (Palo Alto, CA, USA).
`The autosampler was programmed to perform precolumn
`derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde with peak detection
`by fluorescence with an excitation wavelength of 340 nm
`and an emission wavelength 420 nm. Peak areas were
`determined using a ChromJet integrator (Thermo Sepa-
`ration Products, San Jose, CA, USA).
`Plasma and urinary MDA assay. MDA, a lipid hy-
`droperoxide,
`is formed by b-scission of peroxidized
`polyunsaturated fatty acids was measured by derivatiza-
`tion with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) as reported previ-
`ously [25]. Briefly, the mobile phase consisted of 40:60
`ratio (vol/vol) of methanol to 50 mmol/L potassium
`monobasic phosphate at pH 6.8, pumped at a rate of
`1.0 mL/min on a Hewlett-Packard Hypersil 5 l ODS
`100 × 4.6 mm placed in a column warmer set to 37
`◦
`C.
`Samples of plasma and urine were treated with the an-
`tioxidant, butylated hydroxytoluene (to prevent in vitro
`◦
`oxidation) and heat derivatized at 100
`C for 1 hour with
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2011, p. 3
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01495
`
`

`
`2282
`
`Agarwal et al: Intravenous iron and oxidative stress
`
`Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population
`Iron sucrose +
`Iron
`sucrose + N-acetylcysteine
`placebo
`(NAC)
`
`Overall
`
`TBA at an acid pH. Samples were extracted with n-
`butanol and 10 lL of the extract was injected at 1-minute
`intervals using an autosampler. The Hewlett-Packard
`model 1046A programmable fluorescence detector was
`set at excitation of 515 nm and emission of 553 nm. Re-
`tention time was 1.87 minutes; however, absence of in-
`terfering peaks, allows analysis to be carried out in incre-
`ments of 1 minute per sample. Within-day variability in
`estimation was between 8.6% and 10.3%. Between-days
`variability was 3.6% and 7.9%. Recovery was between
`88% and 101%.
`Urinary MCP-1 assay. MCP-1 was assayed in urine
`using a sandwich ELISA (Quantikine(cid:1) kit for Human
`MCP-1 Immunoassay) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN,
`USA). A standard curve was generated using a four pa-
`rameter logistic curve-fit. Corrections were made for con-
`centration and values were expressed as pg MCP-1 per
`mg creatinine.
`SOD and GSHPx activity. SOD activity was measured
`in red blood cell lysate using an end point spectropho-
`tometric technique (Superoxide Dismutase Assay)
`(Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). GSHPx
`activity in red blood cell lysate was determined using an
`indirectly coupled reaction with glutathione reductase in
`a kinetic spectrophotometric assay (Glutathione Peroxi-
`dase Assay) Cayman Chemical Co.).
`Urine protein, creatinine, and NAG determination.
`Concentration of urinary protein was quantified through
`an end point spectrophotometric assay utilizing pyro-
`gallol red-molybdate (quanTtest red) (Quantimetrix,
`Redondo Beach, CA, USA). Urine creatinine concen-
`tration was determined using an end point spectrophoto-
`metric with an alkaline-picrate solution (Creatinine Kit)
`(Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, USA). Urinary NAG
`was measured by colorimetric assay (Roche Diagnostics
`Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Other laboratory
`assays were performed using standard methods in the
`hospital laboratory.
`
`10
`71 ± 5.9
`10
`8/2
`93 ± 19.2
`30 ± 12.5
`
`2
`9
`6
`
`Number of patients
`Age years
`Male number
`Whites/Blacks number
`Weight kg
`Body mass index kg·m2
`Tobacco use number
`Current
`Former
`Coronary artery
`disease number
`Etiology of kidney disease number
`Hypertension
`3
`Diabetes mellitus
`6
`Other
`0
`Angiotensin-convering
`3
`enzyme (ACE) inhibitor
`therapy number
`Systolic blood pressure
`mm Hg
`Diastolic blood pressure
`mm Hg
`Heart rate beats/min
`Modification of Diet in
`Renal Disease Study
`glomerular filtration
`rate mL/min
`Angiotensin receptor
`blocker therapy number
`Erythropoietin therapy
`number
`Hemoglobin g/dL
`Iron lg/dL
`Total iron binding
`capacity lg/dL
`Ferritin ng/mL
`Serum albumin g/dL
`Total cholesterol mg/dL
`Low-density lipoprotein
`cholesterol mg/dL
`High-density lipoprotein
`cholesterol mg/dL
`Triglycerides mg/dL
`
`138 ± 29.0
`69 ± 10.5
`70 ± 10.1
`25 ± 7.1
`
`5
`
`4
`11.3 ± 1.1
`60.3 ± 28.8
`351 ± 92
`85 ± 75
`3.8 ± 0.4
`151 ± 53.5
`80 ± 37.1
`38 ± 11.8
`178 ± 112.4
`
`10
`75 ± 7.6
`10
`7/3
`97 ± 23.8
`32 ± 7.6
`
`20
`73 ± 7.0
`20
`15/5
`96 ± 21.3
`31 ± 10.1
`
`2
`8
`8
`
`3
`6
`1
`7
`
`4
`17
`14
`
`6
`12
`1
`10
`
`148 ± 23.4
`66 ± 11.7
`64 ± 10.7
`27 ± 7.4
`
`143 ± 26.1
`67 ± 11.0
`67 ± 10.6
`26 ± 7.2
`
`5
`
`10
`
`2
`11.1 ± 0.7
`59.4 ± 19.0
`322 ± 67
`127 ± 100
`4.0 ± 0.3
`160 ± 54.2
`74 ± 25.7
`39 ± 8.3
`224 ± 155.2
`
`6
`11.2 ± 0.9
`60.3 ± 28.8
`336 ± 80
`106 ± 89
`4.0 ± 0.4
`155 ± 52.6
`77 ± 31.2
`38 ± 9.9
`201 ± 134.0
`
`Statistical analysis
`The primary outcome variable of this study was the
`time course of urinary MDA, protein and NAG excre-
`tion rates, total amount excreted and their relationship
`to serum transferrin saturation. Other outcome vari-
`ables included the influence of NAC on these parameters.
`Treatment effects were analyzed using repeated measures
`analysis of variance with time and treatment as indepen-
`dent factors. Differences between means was tested by
`the least significant difference test. Scales of KDQOL
`were analyzed by repeated measures, one-way analysis
`of variance (ANOVA). All P values are two sided and
`significance set at <0.05. All statistical analyses were per-
`formed using Statistica for Windows, version 5.5 (Stat-
`Soft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
`
`RESULTS
`Study participants
`Actual subject study participation occurred between
`April 2003 and August 2003. Baseline and clinical char-
`acteristics are shown in Table 1. Subjects treated with in-
`travenous iron with and without NAC were similar with
`respect to demographic and clinical characteristics out-
`lined. There were no women reflecting the paucity of
`women with kidney disease among the veteran popula-
`tion. The distribution of the etiology of kidney disease,
`age, race, weight, and body mass index were similar. Base-
`line hematologic, lipid, and other laboratory characteris-
`tics were well matched.
`There was no increase in hemoglobin or reticulocytes
`over 1 week (Table 2). In fact, there was a small fall
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2011, p. 4
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01495
`
`

`
`Agarwal et al: Intravenous iron and oxidative stress
`
`2283
`
`Table 2. Baseline laboratory parameters before and after treatment
`with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or no antioxidants
`Iron sucrose + placebo
`Iron sucrose + NAC
`Pre
`Post
`Pre
`Post
`8.0 ± 3.6
`7.8 ± 3.4
`7.3 ± 1.9
`6.7 ± 2.0
`White blood cells
`×1000/lL
`Hemoglobin g/dL 11.3 ± 1.1 11.3 ± 0.9
`11.1 ± 0.7
`10.8 ± 0.5
`84.0 ± 6.2 83.9 ± 6.7
`89.5 ± 5.6
`89.3 ± 5.5
`Mean corpuscular
`volume fL
`15.9 ± 1.6 15.8 ± 1.3
`14.6 ± 1.6
`14.5 ± 1.7
`RDW %
`33.5 ± 0.7 33.8 ± 0.7
`34.1 ± 0.8
`34.1 ± 0.8
`MCHC g/dL
`Platelets ×1000/lL 237 ± 95.6 243 ± 91.4 198 ± 40.6 192 ± 38.7
`1.9 ± 0.5
`1.8 ± 0.3
`1.4 ± 0.6
`1.4 ± 0.4
`Reticulocytes %
`59.4 ±28.8 51.9 ±14.7 59.4 ±19.0 54.1 ± 12.8
`Iron lg/dL
`351 ± 92.4 368 ± 91.9 322 ± 67.1 317 ± 44.2
`Total iron binding
`capacity lg/dL
`19 ± 6
`18 ± 10
`17 ± 3
`15 ± 5
`Transferrrin
`saturation %
`85 ± 75.4
`91 ± 57.2 127 ± 99.9 169 ± 107.3
`Ferritin ng/lL
`Abbreviations are: RDW, red cell distribution width; and MCHC, mean
`corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. Data shown are mean ± standard
`deviation. None of the changes are statistically significant except in hemoglobin
`(fall of 0.26 g/dL, (95% CI 0.5 to 0, P = 0.042) and in serum ferritin (increase of
`30.3 ng/mL, 95% CI 17.9 to 42.6 ng/mL, P < 0.001).
`
`in hemoglobin concentration of 0.26 g/dL (P = 0.042).
`Serum iron and TIBC were unchanged over 1 week, but
`serum ferritin increased by 30.3 ng/mL (P < 0.001).
`
`Time course of transferrin saturation, generation
`of oxidative stress, and renal injury
`Figure 2 shows the overall results of the trial. Plasma
`and urinary MDA (top two rows of plots) increased
`rapidly within 30 minutes of administration of intra-
`venous iron and were accompanied by an increase in pro-
`teinuria and enzymuria (third and fourth rows of plots). In
`contrast, transferrin saturation did not peak until 3 hours
`and returned to baseline by 24 hours (last row of plots). A
`significant effect of time was seen for all variables shown
`in Figure 1. Plasma MDA was increased at the 15 and
`30 minutes time point and was significantly different from
`the remaining levels (ANOVA, P < 0.0001). Urine MDA
`and NAG were maximal at 30 minutes and significantly
`different from rest of the excretion rates (ANOVA, P <
`0.0001). Proteinuria was also maximal at 30 minutes but
`the excretion rates at 15 and 60 minutes collection points
`were also similar to that at 30 minutes (ANOVA, P <
`0.0001). Since there was no effect of NAC and no dif-
`ference between the two visits, least square means from
`ANOVA and pooled standard errors of the means are
`shown in Table 3 to illustrate the time course of the ox-
`idative stress, iron saturation, and response.
`
`Effect of NAC on generation of oxidative stress
`and renal injury
`Compliance with intake of NAC assessed by measuring
`the volume of returned drug was 101% ± 8%. Because
`oxidative stress occurred within minutes, the area un-
`
`der the curve (AUC) of the plasma MDA concentration
`time curves were compared from baseline to 180 minutes.
`There was a significant improvement in plasma MDA
`generation with NAC (P = 0.048). The AUC between the
`two intravenous iron infusions using placebo were 184 ±
`244 lmol × min/L and 244 ± 51 lmol × min/L, whereas
`with NAC they were 217 ± 60 lmol × min/L and 199 ±
`45 lmol × min/L, respectively (Fig. 3, top panels). The
`redox ratio measured by plasma oxidized to reduced glu-
`tathione remained unaltered with treatment with NAC
`(Table 4). The total amount of MDA, protein, and NAC
`excreted in urine over the 24 hours in patients treated
`with NAC and placebo were unchanged. Although NAC
`did not change the 24-hour or the first 3-hour excretion of
`urinary MDA, Figure 3 shows that the amount of MDA
`excreted from 3 to 24 hours was reduced with NAC from
`4.24± 2.02 lg to 3.36± 1.47 lg compared to 3.50± 1.19 lg
`to 4.08 ± 1.88 lg following placebo (ANOVA for interac-
`tion, P = 0.041). The free radical scavenging enzymes in
`the red blood cells such as SOD and GSHPx remained un-
`changed with the administration of NAC (Table 4). NAC
`was unable to reduce the urinary MCP-1 levels that were
`unchanged 1 week after intravenous iron administration
`(Table 4).
`
`Changes in kidney disease quality of life
`There were no statistically significant changes in
`KDQOL, except in the pain scale (Table 5). Despite nee-
`dle sticks and intravenous catheters, subjects reported im-
`provement in pain (higher number is associated with less
`pain) on average 14.5% (95% CI, 0.06 to 28.9, P = 0.049).
`A trend toward improvement in physical functioning was
`seen 5.25% (95% CI, −1.1 to 11.6, P = 0.10).
`
`Safety and adverse events
`There were two serious adverse events seen. One pa-
`tient had sudden death the night after the day of infusion.
`He had underlying coronary artery disease and the event
`was not believed to be related to the study drug. Two pa-
`tients had diarrhea thought to be related to the study drug.
`One patient had diarrhea about 12 hours after the infu-
`sion that was accompanied by bloody stools. The other
`patient had diarrhea within 1 hour of administration of
`the study drug.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The major findings of our study are that oxidative stress
`occurs rapidly with infusion of intravenous iron sucrose
`in patients with CKD in doses recommended by the man-
`ufacturer. Oxidative stress so induced is accompanied
`by the occurrence of renal tubular damage and possibly
`increase in glomerular permeability as assessed by en-
`zymuria and increase in proteinuria, respectively. These
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2011, p. 5
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01495
`
`

`
`2284
`
`Agarwal et al: Intravenous iron and oxidative stress
`
`Iron sucrose + NAC
`Pre NAC
`Post NAC
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800 1400
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`2.0
`
`1.5
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Plasma MDA, µmol/L
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`nmol/min
`
`Urinary MDA excretion rate,
`
`Iron sucrose – NAC
`Pre placebo
`Post placebo
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800 1400
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`2.0
`
`1.5
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Plasma MDA, µmol/L
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`nmol/min
`
`Urinary MDA excretion rate,
`
`mU/min
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`0
`
`200
`
`600
`400
`Time, minutes
`
`800 1400
`
`10
`
`0
`
`mU/min
`
`Urinary NAG excretion rate,
`
`5000
`4000
`3000
`2000
`1000
`0
`
`Urinary protein excretion rate,
`
`µg/min
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Transferrin saturation, %
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`0
`
`200
`
`600
`400
`Time, minutes
`
`800 1400
`
`10
`
`0
`
`5000
`4000
`3000
`2000
`1000
`0
`
`Urinary NAG excretion rate,
`
`Urinary protein excretion rate,
`
`µg/min
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`20
`
`0
`
`Transferrin saturation, %
`
`Fig. 2. Time course of biomarkers of oxidative stress, renal injury, and transferrin saturation. Time refers to the actual time of blood sampling or,
`in the case of urinary excretion rates, the midpoint of the sampling interval. Time 0 is the midpoint of injection of iron sucrose. Error bars reflect
`standard errors. Abbreviations are: NAC, N-acetylcysteine; MDA, malondialdehyde; NAG, N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminidase.
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2011, p. 6
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01495
`
`

`
`Agarwal et al: Intravenous iron and oxidative stress
`
`2285
`
`Table 3. Time course of transferrin saturation (TSAT), oxidative stress, and renal injury markers
`
`Time
`minutes
`
`0
`15
`30
`60
`120
`180
`1440
`
`Urine N-acetyl-b-D-
`Urine
`Plasma
`glucosaminidase
`malondialdehyde
`malondialdehyde
`(NAG) mU/min
`(MDA) nmol/min
`(MDA) lmol/L
`TSAT %
`13.5 ± 1.5
`2.94 ± 0.24
`0.89 ± 0.14
`9.7 ± 2.2
`15.1 ± 2.5
`6.33 ± 0.88
`1.42 ± 0.12
`41.4 ± 5
`23.4 ± 5.6
`13.32 ± 1.81
`1.39 ± 0.2
`45.6 ± 5
`14.2 ± 3.3
`9.44 ± 1.79
`1.05 ± 0.11
`52 ± 5.1
`12.6 ± 2.5
`6.85 ± 0.78
`1.08 ± 0.16
`63.3 ± 4.8
`12.7 ± 3.8
`7.28 ± 1.01
`0.95 ± 0.13
`73 ± 4.8
`5.8 ± 1.3
`3.00 ± 0.39
`0.75 ± 0.1
`34.9 ± 7.3
`Influence of iron sucrose on TSAT, oxidative stress (plasma MDA, urine MDA) and renal injury (urine NAG, urine protein) markers in patients with chronic kidney
`disease (CKD). There was a significant treatment time interaction for all parameters. Values are least square mean ± pooled standard error of mean. Urine protein
`excretion rates represent geometric means and 95% confidence intervals.
`
`Midpoint of urine
`collection
`minutes
`−15
`7.5
`22.5
`45
`90
`150
`810
`
`Urine protein
`lg/min
`
`237 (61,914)
`312 (80,1219)
`337 (73,1566)
`251 (57,1099)
`203 (47,883)
`189 (39,916)
`100 (24,424)
`
`P = 0.048
`
`NS
`
`1400
`1200
`1000
`800
`600
`400
`200
`
`AUC plasma MDA,
`
`µmol × min/L
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`– NAC
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`+NAC
`
`P = 0.042
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`– NAC
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`+NAC
`
`Fig. 3. Area under curve (AUC) of plasma
`malondialdehyde (MDA) versus time curves
`from 0 to 3 hours and 3 to 24 hours show sig-
`nificant improvement with N-acetylcysteine
`(NAC). Amount of MDA excreted in urine
`over 3 to 24 hours was significantly improved
`with NAC. Error bars reflect the standard de-
`viations and the P values reflect the time-
`treatment interaction effect.
`
`02468
`
`Urine MDA excretion,
`
`µmol/L
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`– NAC
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`+NAC
`
`NS
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`– NAC
`
`Pre Post
`Iron sucrose
`+NAC
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`AUC plasma MDA,
`
`µmol × min/L
`
`3.0
`2.5
`2.0
`1.5
`1.0
`0.5
`0.0
`
`Urine MDA excretion,
`
`µmol/L
`
`changes occur at a time when there is substantial fraction
`of transferrin available to bind to free iron. Furthermore,
`despite some improvement in oxidative stress markers
`with NAC, there is no protection from renal injury. Taken
`together, these data suggest direct damage to the kid-
`ney by the drug, independent of transferrin saturation.
`However, these changes are transient and resolve rapidly
`within 24 hours.
`The time course of transferrin saturation follows what
`has been reported by Parkkinen et al [26]. In hemodialy-
`sis patients, they reported transferrin saturation to be be-
`tween 80% and 90% at 31/2 hours following iron sucrose
`administration in dose and duration of infusion that were
`identical to our study. Transferrin saturation returned to
`normal in 48 hours. Free iron, measured as bleomycin-
`detectable iron, was not increased unless transferrin satu-
`ration was 80% or more. They reported growth of Staphy-
`
`lococcus epidermidis to be increased when incubated in
`serum collected at 31/2 hours and arrested by adding ex-
`ogenous apotransferrin strongly implicating the role of
`free iron in this process.
`In contrast to the findings of bacterial overgrowth in
`serum of patients with transferrin saturation, we found
`maximal oxidative stress, enzymuria and proteinuria to
`occur within 15 to 30 minutes of the infusion. These
`data suggest a novel mechanism of injury independent
`of transferrin saturation. No further increase in oxida-
`tive stress or renal damage was noted beyond the first
`30 minutes, despite progressive uptake of iron by trans-
`ferrin. The results of the antioxidant, NAC, administra-
`tion were mixed. Whereas NAC reduced acute systemic
`generation of oxidative stress and delayed renal genera-
`tion of oxidative stress, there was no improvement in ei-
`ther proteinuria or enzymuria. This further supports the
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2011, p. 7
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01495
`
`

`
`2286
`
`Agarwal et al: Intravenous iron and oxidative stress
`
`Table 4. Parameters related to redox ratio, free radical scavengers, and inflammation
`Iron sucrose +
`N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
`Baseline
`One week
`4580 ± 1108
`4589 ± 1204
`6.3 ± 0.5
`6.3 ± 0.7
`65 ± 13
`59 ± 15
`367 ± 424
`323 ± 317
`
`Iron sucrose + placebo
`Baseline
`One week
`4382 ± 1458
`4234 ± 1779
`6.6 ± 0.9
`6.6 ± 0.8
`48 ± 13
`49 ± 16
`422 ± 296
`416 ± 477
`
`Glutathione peroxidase U/mL red blood cells
`Superoxide dismutase (SOD) U/mL red blood cells
`Oxidized Glutathione %
`24-hour urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
`(MCP-1) after iron infusion pg/mg creatinine
`
`Glutathione peroxidase, SOD, and plasma oxidized glutathione were measured before iron infusion. Urinary MCP-1 was measured in the 24-hour urine specimen
`following iron infusion. Data shown are mean ± SD. Baseline and 1 week refer to the time of measurements. These measurements were performed before iron infusion.
`
`Scale
`
`Table 5. Kidney disease quality of life before and after 1 week of iron administration
`Iron sucrose +
`Iron sucrose + placebo
`N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
`Baseline
`One week
`Baseline
`One week
`73 ± 14.9
`78 ± 13.3
`81 ± 12.4
`86 ± 10.8
`Symptom/problem list
`79 ± 20.9
`83 ± 12.4
`80 ± 16.0
`82 ± 10.9
`Effects of kidney disease
`74 ± 26.6
`75 ± 15.0
`69 ± 23.3
`72 ± 12.1
`Burden of kidney disease
`30 ± 35.0
`25 ± 35.4
`33 ± 35.4
`22 ± 36.3
`Work status
`85 ± 19.6
`91 ± 10.0
`89 ± 12.3
`91.1 ± 11.1
`Cognitive function
`81 ± 14.2
`82 ± 20.4
`85 ± 18.9
`86 ± 13.5
`Quality of social interaction
`55 ± 24.9
`68 ± 21.6
`65 ± 27.1
`72 ± 23.3
`Sleep
`92 ± 14.2
`93 ± 11.7
`92 ± 11.8
`83 ± 32.3
`Social support
`54 ± 23.2
`55 ± 22.2
`53 ± 22.9
`59 ± 20.3
`Overall health
`29 ± 26.3
`35 ± 28.1
`26 ± 22.0
`38 ± 27.9
`Physical functioning
`20 ± 32.9
`43 ± 45.7
`30 ± 35.0
`33 ± 35.4
`Role limitations—physical
`50 ± 28.1
`64 ± 30.1
`46 ± 21.2
`68 ± 25.1
`Pain
`40 ± 21.7
`41 ± 23.1
`43 ± 14.6
`38 ± 15.4
`General health
`79 ± 19.2
`85 ± 11.1
`83 ± 15.6
`78 ± 14.3
`Emotional well-being
`93 ± 14.1
`80 ± 35.8
`60 ± 46.6
`59 ± 32.4
`Role limitations—emotional
`64 ± 30.3
`76 ± 32.5
`68 ± 34.0
`78 ± 19.5
`Social function
`27 ± 20.0
`28 ± 21.1
`33 ± 16.0
`33 ± 21.5
`Energy/fatigue
`27 ± 6.0
`36 ± 7.7
`29 ± 8.6
`33 ± 10.9
`SF-12 Physical Health Composite
`54 ± 7.8
`53 ± 7.6
`53 ± 9.9
`48 ± 7.8
`SF-12 Mental Health Composite
`Data are mean ± standard deviation. No interaction effect between iron infusion and use of antioxidant was seen. There was significant improvement in pain subscale,
`but no other statistical change.
`
`hypothesis that iron sucrose caused damage not simply by
`increasing oxidative stress and/or free iron but also per-
`haps by a direct cytotoxic effect on the renal tubules. This
`may be due to direct effect of the drug on the glomerular
`permeability and tubular integrity. Danielson et al [27]
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket