throbber
Kidney International, Vol. 68 (2005), pp. 1801–1807
`
`The safety and efficacy of ferumoxytol therapy in anemic chronic
`kidney disease patients
`
`BRUCE S. SPINOWITZ, MICHAEL H. SCHWENK, PAULA M. JACOBS, W. KLINE BOLTON,
`MARK R. KAPLAN, CHAIM CHARYTAN, and MARILYN GALLER
`
`Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, The New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, Flushing, New York; Advanced
`Magnetics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts; University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; and Nephrology
`Associates, Nashville, Tennessee
`
`The safety and efficacy of ferumoxytol therapy in anemic
`chronic kidney disease patients.
`Background. Administration of safe and effective iron ther-
`apy in patients with chronic kidney disease is a time consuming
`process. This phase II clinical trial studied ferumoxytol, a semi-
`synthetic carbohydrate-coated iron oxide administered by rapid
`intravenous injection to anemic chronic kidney disease patients
`(predialysis or undergoing peritoneal dialysis).
`Methods. Inclusion criteria included hemoglobin ≤12.5 g/dL
`and transferrin saturation ≤35%. Twenty-one adult patients
`were randomized to receive ferumoxytol in a regimen of 4 doses
`of 255 mg iron in 2 weeks or 2 doses of 510 mg iron in 1 to 2
`weeks. Ferumoxytol was administered at a rate of up to 30 mg
`iron/sec.
`Results. The maximum hemoglobin response following feru-
`moxytol administration occurred at 6 weeks, increasing from a
`baseline of 10.4 ± 1.3 g/dL to 11.4 ± 1.2 g/dL (P < 0.05). Ferritin
`increased from a baseline of 232 ± 216 ng/mL to a maximum
`of 931 ± 361 ng/mL at 2 weeks (P < 0.05), while the baseline
`transferrin saturation increased from 21 ± 10% to 37 ± 22%
`at 1 week (P < 0.05). Seven adverse events in 5 patients during
`this trial were deemed possibly related to ferumoxytol, none
`serious. These events included constipation, chills, tingling, a
`gastrointestinal viral syndrome, delayed pruritic erythematous
`rash, and transient pain at the injection site.
`Conclusion. Although larger studies are required, this small
`study demonstrates that ferumoxytol can be safe and effec-
`tive in increasing iron stores, is associated with an increased
`hemoglobin response, and is well tolerated at a rapid infusion
`rate.
`
`Providing adequate bioavailable iron to patients with
`chronic kidney disease (CKD) is necessary to ensure
`an efficient response to erythropoietic hormone therapy
`[1]. Additionally, there are data supporting a significant
`
`Key words: ferumoxytol, anemia, hemoglobin, iron, ferritin, transferrin
`saturation.
`
`Received for publication August 27, 2004
`and in revised form March 18, 2005, and April 27, 2005
`Accepted for publication May 13, 2005
`
`C(cid:1) 2005 by the International Society of Nephrology
`
`hemoglobin response in this population with parenteral
`iron therapy alone [2]. Oral iron administration is rel-
`atively ineffective in supporting erythropoiesis in CKD
`patients [3–5], and many patients have gastrointestinal
`intolerance of these compounds. As a result, intravenous
`iron is commonly used to achieve and maintain adequate
`iron levels in this patient population.
`Until recently, iron dextran was the only intravenous
`iron preparation available in the United States [6].
`Adverse reactions have been reported in 4.7% to
`43% of patients administered intravenous iron dextran
`[7–9]. Most of these reactions are mild, with 38% of pa-
`tients given a total dose infusion exhibiting delayed re-
`actions of arthralgia, myalgia, and fever. Some patients
`experience anaphylactoid-type reactions (defined as dys-
`pnea, wheezing, chest pain, hypotension, urticaria, or an-
`gioedema), which can be serious and life threatening [9].
`Comparative data on the safety of the currently avail-
`able parenteral iron preparations are difficult to evaluate
`since information on the number of patients treated, the
`specific product and dosage regimen utilized, previous ex-
`posure to other iron preparations, and current diagnoses
`are often not available. Reports are typically retrospec-
`tive, and neither blinded nor comparative. A recent retro-
`spective analysis concluded that the rate of adverse drug
`events was lowest in patients receiving a low-molecular-
`weight iron dextran preparation compared to a higher-
`molecular-weight iron dextran or sodium ferric gluconate
`[10].
`Newer parenteral iron preparations such as sodium
`ferric gluconate and iron sucrose are effective and
`considered safer [11, 12], but require multiple and/or
`relatively time-consuming administration regimens.
`Currently, in the United States, according to the Food
`and Drug Administration labeling, intravenous iron re-
`placement is generally given as a slow infusion of 125 mg
`sodium ferric gluconate over 10 minutes or 100 to 200 mg
`of iron sucrose over approximately 5 minutes. These de-
`livery modes incur significant expense for supplies, such
`
`1801
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1012, p. 1
`
`

`
`1802
`
`Spinowitz et al: Ferumoxytol therapy in chronic kidney disease
`
`as tubing and infusate, costly nursing time, and patient in-
`convenience. To achieve iron repletion with these newer
`agents, commonly a total dose of 1 g ofiron requires 5 to
`10 sessions over an extended period of time.
`Ferumoxytol (Advanced Magnetics, Cambridge, MA,
`USA) is an investigational, semi-synthetic carbohydrate-
`coated, magnetic iron oxide preparation. It is one of a
`class of compounds originally developed as magnetic res-
`onance imaging (MRI) contrast agents, and is adminis-
`tered for MR angiography as a rapid intravenous bolus
`[13, 14]. Ferumoxytol was designed to minimize potential
`immunologic reactions, such as those seen with commer-
`cially available iron dextran products, and to minimize
`free iron during dosing.
`The purpose of this open label study was to evalu-
`ate the safety and efficacy of ferumoxytol in stimulating
`hemoglobin synthesis in anemic CKD patients on stable
`dosing regimens of erythropoietic hormones.
`
`METHODS
`Subjects were recruited from 3 centers in the United
`States for this prospective open-label phase 2 dose esca-
`lation study. The primary purpose of the study was to
`evaluate the safety of 2 dose regimens in this patient
`population, while a secondary purpose was to gather ex-
`ploratory data on efficacy to permit the design of larger
`studies. The study was conducted in accord with the
`Declaration of Helsinki and approved by an Institutional
`Review Board for each site. After granting informed con-
`sent, each subject had screening laboratory tests, a med-
`ical history, and a physical examination performed to
`establish a baseline and confirm inclusion criteria and
`exclusion criteria. Patients included had been diagnosed
`with CKD and could be on peritoneal dialysis therapy
`but not hemodialysis. Other inclusion criteria included
`an age of 18 years or greater, hemoglobin level less than
`or equal to 12.5 g/dL, and a transferrin saturation of 35%
`or less.
`Exclusion criteria included women who were pregnant
`or lactating, the use of parenteral or oral iron therapy
`in the previous 2 weeks, transfusions or active bleed-
`ing in the previous 2 months, major surgery within the
`previous month, active infections, inflammatory condi-
`tions, multiple drug sensitivities, autoimmune disease,
`immunodeficiencies, androgen therapy within the past
`12 weeks, iron overload (transferrin saturation 50% or
`greater, serum ferritin 800 ng/mL or greater), severe hy-
`perparathyroidism (parathyroid hormone greater than
`1500 pg/mL), serum AST or ALT greater than 2 times
`the upper limit of normal, and receipt of an investiga-
`tional drug in the previous 30 days.
`Patients were allowed, but not required, to be on ery-
`thropoietic hormone therapy and the dose was allowed
`
`to be modified in accordance with each site’s established
`protocol for therapy.
`Serum aluminum and parathyroid hormone concen-
`trations and occult blood in the stool were determined at
`screening. Serum chemistries, prothrombin time, and ac-
`tivated partial thromboplastin times were obtained prior
`to drug administration, and repeated one week follow-
`ing completion of the dosing regimen. A complete blood
`count and measures of body iron status (serum iron, to-
`tal iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, ferritin,
`and transferrin) were obtained at screening and weekly
`for 8 weeks following the first dose, using routine clinical
`chemistry and hematology testing
`The study drug, ferumoxytol (Advanced Magnetics,
`Inc.), is a superparamagnetic iron oxide (magnetite)
`nanoparticle coated with a semi-synthetic carbohydrate
`designed to minimize immunologic sensitivity. The drug
`has an average colloidal particle size of 30 nm by light
`scattering and a molecular weight of 750 kD. Ferumoxy-
`tol is a sterile liquid formulated to contain 30 mg/mL of
`elemental iron and 44 mg/mL of mannitol. It is isotonic
`and neutral pH.
`Patients were to receive either 4 intravenous doses of
`ferumoxytol at 255 mg of iron (group 1) or 2 intravenous
`doses of ferumoxytol at 510 mg of iron (group 2). All
`patients in group 1 were dosed and evaluated for safety
`prior to enrolling any patients in group 2. Group 1 doses
`were given every 2 to 3 days, while group 2 doses were
`administered one week apart. An intravenous line (but-
`terfly) was placed into a peripheral vein and 0.9% NaCl
`was infused to keep the vein open. The appropriate dose
`of ferumoxytol was administered by intravenous injection
`into the peripheral vein at a rate of 1 mL/sec (30 mg/sec)
`(i.e., 9 seconds for the 255 mg dose or 17 seconds for the
`510 mg dose). A 10 to 20 mL normal saline intravenous
`flush was given after drug administration.
`Safety monitoring during drug administration included
`measurement of blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory
`rate, and oral temperature prior to drug administration,
`and repeated at 15, 30, and 60 minutes after ferumoxy-
`tol administration, as well as at weekly visits for 8 weeks
`thereafter, along with evaluation for adverse events. Ad-
`verse events were defined as illnesses, signs, or symp-
`toms that appeared or worsened after the implemen-
`tation of study procedures; evaluated as serious or not
`serious; as mild, moderate, or severe; as definitely, prob-
`ably, possibly, unlikely, or definitely not related to drug
`administration.
`Primary efficacy outcomes included changes from
`baseline of hemoglobin, transferrin saturation, and serum
`ferritin levels. The time to maximum response was evalu-
`ated, as well as epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa dosing
`regimens in the 4 weeks prior to and 8 weeks post feru-
`moxytol administration. Safety data were gathered and
`adverse events noted and evaluated for their association
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1012, p. 2
`
`

`
`Spinowitz et al: Ferumoxytol therapy in chronic kidney disease
`
`1803
`
`Table 1. Subject demographic and baseline clinical values
`
`Gender
`Age
`
`Dose groups
`2 × 510 mg
`4 × 255 mg
`Total
`(N = 21)
`(N = 11)
`(N = 10)
`9M/12F
`5M/6F
`4M/6F
`63.2 ± 15.4
`58.0 ± 17.8
`68.9 ± 10.4
`(28–76)
`(28–78)
`(51–86)
`16/4/1
`7/3/1
`9/1/0
`4.3 ± 3.3
`3.2 ± 1.6
`5.5 ± 4.2
`(0.6–15.4)
`(0.6–6.0)
`(1.5–15.4)
`10.4 ± 1.3
`10.0 ± 1.3
`10.9 ± 1.3
`(8.3–12.7)
`(8.3–12.7)
`(8.8–12.6)
`232 ± 216
`266 ± 215
`252 ± 259
`(2–782)
`(2–637)
`(74–782)
`21 ± 10
`21.0 ± 9.8
`20.2 ± 7.3
`(3–47)
`(3–35)
`(14–36)
`23 ± 25a
`31 ± 31a
`15 ± 14
`(4–117)
`(10–117)
`(4–38)
`1/0/3/10/7
`1/0/2/6/2
`0/0/1/4/5
`CKD stage 1/2/3/4/5
`GFR, glomerular filtration rate, as estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, (http://www.hdcn.com/calcf/gfr.htm). Values are given as mean ±
`standard deviation. The range is stated in parentheses.
`aOne patient with membranous nephropathy had a creatinine of 0.6 and GFR of 117. If this patient is excluded, the 2 × 510 group averages 23 ± 14 (10–53) and the
`combined group is 19 ± 12 (4–53).
`
`Race (white/black/Hispanic)
`Serum creatinine mg/dL
`
`Hemoglobin g/dL
`
`Ferritin ng/mL
`
`Transferrin saturation %
`
`GFR mL/min/1.73m2
`
`with ferumoxytol. Efficacy data were evaluated for each
`individual dosing group as well as the combination of both
`groups.
`
`Statistics
`All results are expressed as mean ± standard devi-
`ation. Changes from baseline for the hematologic and
`iron parameters were examined over time using one-way
`repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), with
`post-hoc Dunnet’s test.
`
`RESULTS
`Twenty-one patients enrolled and completed this study,
`18 of whom were predialysis CKD patients and 3 patients
`(all in group 1) who were receiving chronic peritoneal
`dialysis therapy. Of the 21 patients, 20 had a history of
`hypertension, 14 with diabetes, and 2 with polycystic kid-
`ney disease. The 10 patients in group 1 (4 × 255 mg iron)
`received 40 doses of ferumoxytol and the 11 patients in
`group 2 (2 × 510 mg iron) received 22 doses of feru-
`moxytol. All patients completed dosing as planned. Pa-
`tient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics
`are presented in Table 1. Group 1 patients had a higher
`hemoglobin (10.9 g/dL) at baseline than group 2 (10.0),
`but this difference was not statistically significant.
`Hematologic parameters and measures of iron status
`are presented in Table 2, including baseline and maxi-
`mal values, and the time in weeks at which the peak re-
`sponse was observed. Since the 2 dosing groups received
`the same total iron dosage, they were also combined
`to form 1 group for statistical analysis. Changes in iron
`status as reflected in ferritin and transferrin saturation
`(Figs. 1 and 2) were maximal after 1 to 2 weeks, as was
`
`the reticulocyte count, while hemoglobin and hematocrit
`peaked later, at 5 to 6 weeks. Nine patients exhibited
`transient ferritin values over 1000 (4 in group 1, 5 in
`group 2). At 8 weeks after dosing was completed, 2 pa-
`tients still had ferritin values greater than 1000, while the
`other 7 patients had ferritin values that had decreased to-
`ward baseline. The mean maximal change in hemoglobin
`concentration (at 6 weeks after ferumoxytol administra-
`tion) was 1 g/dL (Fig. 3). Although the 2 groups had
`different baseline hemoglobin values, the hemoglobin
`response was parallel and equivalent in magnitude.
`Among the individual patients, 8 patients in each group
`exhibited an increase in hemoglobin of greater than 0.5
`g/dL. The maximum increase in reticulocyte count was
`seen at 2 weeks.
`In the 4-week period prior to ferumoxytol adminis-
`tration, 13 of the subjects received stable hematopoietic
`hormone therapy (10 subjects received epoetin alfa, 3
`patients received darbepoetin alfa), while 8 subjects did
`not receive either treatment (Table 3). In the 8 weeks af-
`ter ferumoxytol dosing, 15 patients had their dosing regi-
`mens unchanged, 4 patients had their mean weekly doses
`decreased, and 2 patients had increases in their mean
`weekly doses, 1 from 2000 to 3450 units (with no change
`in hemoglobin concentration after ferumoxytol therapy)
`and 1 from 10,000 to 20,000 units (with a maximal change
`in hemoglobin post-ferumoxytol therapy of 0.7 g/dL, less
`than the mean change in the 2 dosing groups). In patients
`receiving epoetin alfa, the pre-ferumoxytol mean weekly
`dosage was 9650 units, compared with the mean weekly
`dose post-ferumoxytol dosage of 9100 units, not statis-
`tically different. The mean weekly darbepoetin dosage
`decreased from 30 lg to27.8 lg after ferumoxytol ad-
`ministration, not statistically different.
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1012, p. 3
`
`

`
`1804
`
`Spinowitz et al: Ferumoxytol therapy in chronic kidney disease
`
`Table 2. The hematologic and iron indices responses to ferumoxytol compared with baseline
`
`Hematocrit %
`
`Hemoglobin g/dL
`
`Reticulocyte count %
`
`Ferritin ng/mL
`
`Transferrin saturation %
`
`Group
`4 × 255 mg
`(N = 10)
`2 × 510 mg
`(N = 11)
`Total
`(N = 21)
`4 × 255 mg
`(N = 10)
`2 × 510 mg
`(N = 11)
`Total
`(N = 21)
`4 × 255 mg
`(N = 10)
`2 × 510 mg
`(N = 11)
`Total
`(N = 21)
`4 × 255 mg
`(N = 10)
`2 × 510 mg
`(N = 11)
`Total
`(N = 21)
`4 × 255 mg
`(N = 10)
`2 × 510 mg
`(N = 11)
`Total
`(N = 21)
`a P < 0.05 compared with baseline value. None of the values for group 1 were different from those of group 2.
`
`Baseline
`33.9 ± 3.3
`30.3 ± 3.4
`32.0 ± 3.8
`10.9 ± 1.3
`10.0 ± 1.3
`10.4 ± 1.3
`1.8 ± 0.6
`1.7 ± 0.9
`1.74 ± 0.8
`252 ± 259
`212 ± 177
`232 ± 216
`20 ± 7
`22 ± 12
`21.3 ± 10
`
`Peak
`36.3 ± 2.2
`33.5 ± 3.8
`34.8 ± 3.4a
`11.8 ± 0.7
`11.0 ± 1.4
`11.4 ± 1.2a
`2.1 ± 1.0
`2.6 ± 1.4
`2.36 ± 1.3
`988 ± 353a
`885 ± 378a
`931 ± 361a
`40 ± 8a
`35 ± 14a
`37.2 ± 22.1a
`
`Time to peak
`
`6 weeks
`
`5 weeks
`
`5 weeks
`
`4 weeks
`
`6 weeks
`
`6 weeks
`
`2 weeks
`
`2 weeks
`
`2 weeks
`
`2 weeks
`
`2 weeks
`
`2 weeks
`
`1 week
`
`2 weeks
`
`1 week
`
`Group I
`Group II
`Group I/II
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`4 W
`
`5
`eeks
`
`1200
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`ng/mL
`
`Group I
`Group II
`Group I/II
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`Weeks
`
`8
`
`10
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`45
`40
`35
`30
`25
`20
`15
`10
`
`50
`
`%
`
`Fig. 1. TSAT response to ferumoxytol.
`
`The only statistically significant change in vital signs
`was a decrease of the mean heart rate in the 4 × 255 mg
`dose group from 73 to 68 following ferumoxytol dosing.
`Routine serum chemistry values (apart from ferritin and
`transferrin saturation) were unchanged in the postdose
`observation period. There were a total of 7 nonserious
`adverse events in 5 patients that were deemed possibly
`related to ferumoxytol; no adverse event was considered
`to be definitely or likely related, and none led to discon-
`tinuation of dosing. These included solitary instances of
`mild constipation a day later (group 1), mild chills an hour
`after dosing (group 2), mild tingling a day after dosing
`(group 1), moderate gastrointestinal upset of presumed
`
`Fig. 2. Ferritin response to ferumoxytol.
`
`viral etiology a day after dosing (group 1), mild delayed
`pruritic, erythematous rash 3 days after dosing (group 2),
`and mild pain at the injection site that resolved after rein-
`sertion of the intravenous line in a different site (group
`2). No adverse event led to discontinuation of dosing.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Ferumoxytol was effective in rapidly increasing mea-
`sures of body iron status (ferritin and transferrin satura-
`tion), in both dosing groups, with a maximal effect seen
`at 1 to 2 weeks. These increases demonstrate that the
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1012, p. 4
`
`

`
`Spinowitz et al: Ferumoxytol therapy in chronic kidney disease
`
`1805
`
`5-minute period with relative safety, and in a dosage of
`up to 500 mg diluted in 250 to 500 mL over a 2- to 6-hour
`dosing duration [3–5, 12, 17–22]. One small, uncontrolled
`study concluded that a regimen of iron sucrose 500 mg in-
`travenously over a 2-hour duration had an unacceptably
`high rate of adverse effects (e.g., hypotension requiring
`hospitalization) [23]. In contrast, a study evaluating the
`same dosing regimen in peritoneal dialysis patients noted
`no adverse drug effects [18].
`Sodium ferric gluconate has generally been diluted in
`100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride, at a dose of 125 mg,
`and given intravenously over a 10-minute interval. Re-
`cently, experience has been reported with 250 mg and up
`to 500 mg dosages (not FDA approved), generally given
`at slower administration rates (up to 5 hours). While one
`study concluded that this could be done without appar-
`ent adverse effects [24], others have noted significant
`untoward reactions (e.g., severe nausea/vomiting, hy-
`potension, and syncope) in 10% to 30% of patients with
`this dosing regimen [25, 26]. If our data and experience
`with ferumoxytol are confirmed in larger cohorts, feru-
`moxytol would clearly represent an improvement in the
`logistic aspects of intravenous iron delivery.
`All adverse events considered possibly related to feru-
`moxytol in this open label, uncontrolled study were mild
`to moderate, and qualitatively similar to other iron prepa-
`rations. No adverse event was serious, and none were
`considered definitely or likely related to drug adminis-
`tration. Anaphylaxis and immediate hypotension were
`not observed in this small study, but the number of ex-
`posures is too small to draw any definitive conclusions.
`Other small studies of ferumoxytol in normal subjects,
`hemodialysis patients, and patients undergoing cardio-
`vascular MRI have reported nausea and metallic taste,
`respectively [13; abstract; Jacobs P et al: J AmSoc Nephrol
`14:27A, 2003].
`The current study was of relatively short duration (less
`than 12 weeks), and, thus, was not designed to address
`the question of potential chronic toxicities of ferumoxy-
`tol. With other parenteral iron preparations, the risks of
`increased infection rates and oxidative stress have been
`noted as possible toxicities. A recent review concluded,
`however, that no studies exist that provide reliable con-
`clusions linking parenteral iron therapy and infection in
`dialysis patients [27]. While oxidative stress may be linked
`to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, careful mon-
`itoring and avoidance of excessive serum ferritin levels
`may minimize this risk [27].
`
`CONCLUSION
`Intravenous ferumoxytol in a dosage of up to 510 mg
`can be given safely as a rapid intravenous bolus. It is ef-
`fective in providing bioavailable iron to increase body
`iron stores, as evidenced by improvements in ferritin and
`
`Group 1
`Group II
`Group I/II
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`Weeks
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`12.00
`
`11.50
`
`11.00
`
`10.50
`
`10.00
`
`9.50
`
`9.00
`
`8.50
`
`Hgb g/dL
`
`Fig. 3. Hemoglobin response to ferumoxytol.
`
`iron contained in ferumoxytol is bioavailable, and is used
`to promote increased hemoglobin synthesis and retic-
`ulocytosis. Ferumoxytol administration was effective in
`stimulating erythropoiesis without a significant increase
`in dosage of hematopoietic hormone therapy, and in pa-
`tients who had “normal” body iron stores (as evidenced
`by the mean serum ferritin concentration of 232 ng/mL
`and mean transferrin saturation of 21%). For the com-
`bined groups there was a mean increase in hemoglobin
`of 1 g/dL, maximally manifested at 6 weeks, while for the
`individual dosing groups there was a similar and paral-
`lel change. This is in keeping with the concept of func-
`tional iron deficiency, seen frequently in patients with
`chronic kidney disease, and which is responsive to ex-
`ogenous iron.
`This study demonstrates that ferumoxytol can be ad-
`ministered as a rapid bolus of 30 mg of iron per second in
`a concentrated form of 30 mg/mL, and in a dosage of up to
`510 mg. In contrast, both iron sucrose and ferric sodium
`gluconate require a much slower rate of administration
`and/or much lower dose, mandating a longer period of
`time and more clinic visits to administer equivalent doses.
`Thus, ferumoxytol has the advantage of requiring fewer
`patient visits and a shorter administration time than these
`commonly used iron therapies, with benefit to the clini-
`cian, ancillary staff, and patient.
`A preparation of iron dextran, which was recalled by
`the FDA in 1990, was the first available parenteral iron
`preparation in the United States. Intravenous infusion
`rates of 100 to 300 mg/min have been reported [15], al-
`though subsequently a maximum rate of 100 mg/minute
`was recommended [16]. Typical dosages reported ranged
`from 500 to 3000 mg, although it is not clear how many of
`the almost 2400 patients actually received (and tolerated)
`the higher dosages/infusion rates. Since serious adverse
`reactions to iron dextran may be induced by relatively
`low doses, it is not possible to accurately describe serious
`adverse reaction rates in this relatively small cohort.
`Iron sucrose has been administered intravenously and
`undiluted in dosages of 100 to 200 mg (5–10 mL) over a
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1012, p. 5
`
`

`
`1806
`
`Spinowitz et al: Ferumoxytol therapy in chronic kidney disease
`
`Table 3. Summary of erythropoietin dosing by dose group and time point
`
`Time point
`Descriptive statistics
`
`Baseline
`Mean ± SD
`Day 7 (week 1)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`Day 14 (week 2)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`Day 21 (week 3)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`Day 28 (week 4)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`Day 35 (week 5)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`Day 42 (week 6)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`Day 49 (week 7)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`Day 56 (week 8)
`Mean ± SD
`Change from baseline (mean ± SD)
`
`4 × 255 mg iron
`N = 10
`7200.0 ± 8066.4
`N = 10
`7000.0 ± 8232.7
`−200.0 ± 632.5
`Not recorded
`
`N = 10
`9245.0 ± 8015.3
`2045.0 ± 5590.5
`N = 10
`7745.0 ± 8219.6
`545.0 ± 8788.5
`N = 10
`7745.0 ± 8219.6
`545.0 ± 8788.5
`N = 10
`4745.0 ± 6689.6
`−2455.0 ± 6479.3
`N = 10
`4745.0 ± 6689.6
`−2455.0 ± 6479.3
`N = 10
`6795.0 ± 6467.3
`−405.0 ± 5019.0
`
`Ferumoxytol
`2 × 510 mg iron
`N = 11
`6272.7 ± 9381.8
`N = 11
`4090.9 ± 7435.8
`−2181.8 ± 12944.6
`N = 9
`6111.1 ± 9360.1
`−1555.6 ± 9043.1
`N = 9
`3888.9 ± 7912.7
`−2666.7 ± 8000.0
`N = 11
`5000.0 ± 8729.3
`−1272.7 ± 8112.8
`N = 7
`4428.6 ± 7345.2
`−2000.0 ± 10392.3
`N = 10
`3000.0 ± 6342.1
`−1500.0 ± 8527.7
`N = 9
`4444.4 ± 6839.4
`−555.6 ± 9837.6
`N = 6
`3333.3 ± 8165.0
`−2333.3 ± 11343.1
`
`Total
`N = 21
`6714.3 ± 8574.0
`N = 21
`5476.2 ± 7769.3
`−1238.1 ± 9219.0
`N = 10
`5500.0 ± 9033.9
`−1400.0 ± 8540.1
`N = 19
`6707.9 ± 8215.8
`−186.8 ± 7064.9
`N = 21
`6307.1 ± 8395.0
`−407.1 ± 8278.3
`N = 17
`6379.4 ± 7814.5
`−502.9 ± 9252.7
`N = 20
`3872.5 ± 6407.1
`−1977.5 ± 7387.4
`N = 19
`4602.6 ± 6571.8
`−1555.3 ± 8059.3
`N = 16
`5496.9 ± 7093.2
`−1128.1 ± 7676.8
`
`transferrin saturation, and in raising hemoglobin levels in
`anemic CKD patients. Compared with other parenteral
`iron preparations, it may provide efficiencies of time,
`and perhaps cost, for patients and clinicians. Definitive
`conclusions, including chronic toxicities, will be drawn
`based upon the results of larger clinical trials, currently
`in progress.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`This study was funded by Advanced Magnetics Incorporated,
`Cambridge, MA. Part of this work was presented at the 37th Annual
`Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, San Diego, November
`2003.
`
`Reprint requests to Michael H. Schwenk, PharmD, The New York
`Hospital Medical Center of Queens, Division of Nephrology and Hyper-
`tension, 56–45 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11355.
`E-mail: mhschwen@nyp.org
`
`REFERENCES
`1. NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines
`for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification and stratifica-
`tion. Am J Kidney Dis 39(Suppl 1):S1–S266, 2002
`2. SILVERBERG DS, IAINA A, PEER G, et al: Intravenous iron supple-
`mentation for the treatment of the anemia of moderate to severe
`chronic renal failure patients not receiving dialysis. Am J Kidney
`Dis 27:234–238, 1996
`3. SILVERBERG DS, BLUM M, AGBARIA Z, et al: Intravenous iron for the
`treatment of predialysis anemia. Kidney Int 69:S79–S85, 1999
`4. MACDOUGALL IC, TUCKER B, THOMPSON J, et al: Arandomized con-
`trolled study of iron supplementation in patients treated with ery-
`thropoietin. Kidney Int 50:1694–1699, 1996
`
`5. SILVERBERG DS, IAINA A, PEER G, et al: Intravenous iron supple-
`mentation for the treatment of the anemia of moderate to severe
`chronic renal failure patients not receiving dialysis. Am J Kidney
`Dis 27:234–238, 1996
`6. BURNS DL, POMPOSELLI JJ: Toxicity of parenteral iron dextran ther-
`apy. Kidney Int 69:S119–S124, 1999
`7. FISHBANE S, UNGUREANU VD, MAESAKA JK, et al: The safety of in-
`travenous iron dextran in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis
`28:529–534, 1996
`8. HAMSTRA RD, BLOCK MH, SCHOCKET AL: Intravenous iron dextran
`in clinical medicine. JAMA 243:1726–1731, 1980
`9. AUERBACH M, WITT D, TOLER W, et al: Clinical use of the total dose
`intravenous infusion of iron dextran. J Lab Clin Med 111:566–570,
`1988
`10. CHERTOW GC, MASON PD, VAAGE-NILSEN O, AHLMEN J: On the rela-
`tive safety of parenteral iron preparations. Nephrol Dial Transplant
`19:1571–1575, 2004
`11. WATSON PHARMA, INC.: Ferrlecit(cid:1) 2001 package insert, 2001
`12. AMERICAN REGENT: Venofer(cid:1) product package insert, 2005
`13. PRINCE MR, ZHANG HL, CHABRA SG, et al: Apilot investigation
`of new superparamagnetic iron oxide (ferumoxytol) as a contrast
`agent for cardiovascular MRI. J X Ray Science Technol 11:231–240,
`2003
`14. ERSOY H, JACOBS P, KENT CK, et al: Blood pool MR angiography of
`aortic stent-graft endoleak. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1181–1186,
`2004
`15. MARCHASIN S, WALLERSTEIN RO: The treatment of iron-deficiency
`anemia with intravenous iron dextran. Blood 23:354–358, 1964
`Intravenous
`iron-dextran complex. Blood
`16. WALLERSTEIN RO:
`32:690–695, 1968
`17. AL-MOMEN AM, HURAIB SO, MITWALLI AH, et al: Intravenous iron
`saccharate in hemodialysis patients receiving r-HuEPO. Saudi J
`Kidney Dis Transplant 5:168–172, 1994
`18. DOMRONGKITCHAIPORN S, JIRAKRANONT B, ATAMASRIKUL K, et al: In-
`dices of iron status in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
`patients. Am J Kidney Dis 34:29–35, 1999
`19. PRAKASH S, WALELE A, DIMKOVIC N, et al: Experience with a large
`dose (500 mg) of intravenous iron dextran and iron saccharate in
`peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 21:290–295, 2001
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1012, p. 6
`
`

`
`Spinowitz et al: Ferumoxytol therapy in chronic kidney disease
`
`1807
`
`20. AGGARWAL HK, TZIVISKOU E, BELLIZZI V, et al: Prolonged adminis-
`tration over six hours of large doses of intravenous iron saccharate
`(500 mg) prevents severe adverse reactions in peritoneal dialysis
`patients. Perit Dial Int 22:636–637, 2002
`21. SCHWENK MH, BLAUSTEIN DA: Rapid, high-dose intravenous iron
`sucrose therapy in 2 Jehovah’s Witness patients with chronic kidney
`disease. Clin Nephrol 62:116–120, 2004
`22. BLAUSTEIN DA, SCHWENK MH, CHATTOPADHYAY J, et al: The safety
`and efficacy of an accelerated iron sucrose dosing regimen in pa-
`tients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 63(Suppl 87):S72–S77,
`2003
`23. CHANDLER G, HARCHOWAL J, MACDOUGALL IC: Intravenous iron
`
`sucrose: Establishing a safe dose. Am J Kidney Dis 38:988–991, 2001
`24. FOLKERT VW, MICHAEL B, AGARWAL R, et al: Chronic use of sodium
`ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: Safety of higher-
`dose (≥250 mg) administration. Am J Kidney Dis 41:651–657, 2003
`25. BASTANI B, JAIN A, PANDURANGAN G: Incidence of side-effects asso-
`ciated with high-dose ferric gluconate in patients with severe chronic
`renal failure. Nephrology 8:8–10, 2003
`26. DANDA RS, KIRK LJ, PERGOLA PE: High-dose iron gluconate in
`chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrology 9:47–48, 2004
`27. ARONOFF GR: Safety of intravenous iron in clinical practice: Im-
`plications for anemia management protocols. J AmSoc Nephrol
`15:S99–S106, 2004
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1012, p. 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket