throbber
Intravenous Iron Dextran in Clinical Medicine
`
`Roger D. Hamstra, MD; Matthew H. Block, PhD, MD; Alan L. Schocket, MD
`
`Four hundred seventy-one adult patients and ten adult prisoner
`injections of
`volunteers received 2,099 intravenous (IV)
`iron dextran
`(Imferon), usually 250 to 500 mg at less than 100 mg/min. Intravenous iron
`supplies enough iron to permit RBC formation greater than 50 mL/day and
`repletion of tissue iron. Tissue iron did not always supply iron at an optimal
`rate. Hemoglobin production was higher after IV than oral or intramuscular
`iron if the hemoglobin level was less than 9 g/dL. Three life-threatening
`immediate anaphylactoid and eight severe delayed reactions were observed.
`There were no deaths. Delayed reactions were more frequent in women and
`collagen-vascular diseases and less frequent in pregnancy. Because anaphy-
`lactoid reactions are serious and unpredictable, IV iron dextran should be
`used only when iron deficiency anemia cannot be treated adequately with
`oral iron.
`(JAMA 243:1726-1731, 1980)
`
`PARENTERAL iron therapy is a
`therapeutic option in the treatment of
`iron deficiency anemia. Both dextri-
`ferron and iron dextran have been
`given intravenously (IV) with accept¬
`able patient tolerance and hemoglo¬
`In the United States,
`bin response.
`because of fear of adverse reactions,
`extensive experience in the use of IV
`iron has not been reported. This
`report relates our experience with IV
`iron dextran therapy from January
`1962 to January 1970. During this
`period, 293 patients from a general
`hospital population (Colorado Gener¬
`al Hospital, Denver), 178 patients
`from a thoracic surgical service (Na¬
`tional Jewish Hospital, Denver), plus
`ten prisoner volunteers were treated
`with IV iron dextran (Table 1).' The
`patients and prisoner volunteers were
`given a total of 2,099 injections (Table
`2). The latter were intensively studied
`response to phleboto¬
`during their
`my." No patient was admitted to the
`study after January 1970, and the
`study was terminated in January
`1975.
`
`From the Divisions of Hematology (Drs Hamstra
`Immunology (Dr Schock-
`and Block) and Clinical
`et), University of Colorado Health Science Center,
`Denver.
`Reprints not available.
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`iron deficiency was
`The diagnosis of
`established by assessment of
`(1) blood
`(2) mean corpuscular hemoglobin
`loss;
`concentration, mean corpuscular volume,
`and RBC morphology; and (3) measure¬
`ment of plasma and bone marrow iron
`levels. Blood loss in patients was substan¬
`tiated by a history of hematemesis, hema-
`turia, melena, menorrhagia, and frequent
`stool examination for occult blood by the
`guaiac reaction, and in prisoners by phle¬
`botomy and almost daily testing of stools
`for occult blood, also by the guaiac meth¬
`od.
`
`Patient Population
`Forty-two percent of the patients were
`on the medical service, with 68% being
`inpatients (Table 1). Four percent of the
`patients had obstetrical or gynecological
`problems, the majority prepartum or post-
`partum. Forty-one percent of the patients
`
`Table 1.
`
`Source of Patients
`
`—
`
`Medicine
`General surgery
`Autotransfusion
`Obstetrics
`Gynecology
`Pediatrics
`Other
`Prisoners
`Total
`
`In-
`patients
`130
`25
`178
`27
`12
`1
`3
`10
`386
`
`Out¬
`patients
`64
`1
`0
`19
`9
`1
`1
`0
`95
`
`the majority
`were subjected to surgery,
`having cardiac surgery with autotransfu¬
`sion' at National Jewish Hospital. Based
`on prior experience at Colorado General
`Hospital, all patients at National Jewish
`Hospital with even a suspicious personal
`family history of a drug reaction,
`or
`allergic rash, or rheumatoid arthritis were
`excluded from the IV iron dextran auto-
`transfusion program. The small number of
`general surgical patients is partly attrib¬
`utable to admission at Colorado General
`Hospital of patients bleeding from the
`gastrointestinal tract to the medical ser¬
`vice with subsequent transfer to the surgi¬
`cal service when workup was complete and
`the patient's condition was stable. In addi¬
`tion, there were ten prisoners who volun¬
`teered for studies in which erythropoietic
`response to chronic1 and acute' blood loss
`was measured while iron stores, but not
`necessarily iron availability, were main¬
`tained with IV iron dextran.
`
`Injection Schedules
`inpa-
`At Colorado General Hospital,
`tients were usually injected daily and
`outpatients once or twice weekly. Auto-
`transfused patients at National Jewish
`Hospital were injected immediately after
`each phlebotomy one to four times in the
`ten days preceding surgery.' Prisoners in
`the chronic blood loss experiment were
`injected one to five times weekly.
`Each injection usually contained 250 or
`500 mg because the drug was supplied in
`ampules containing these amounts and
`because variations of 100 mg per injection
`did not influence reaction rate or erythro¬
`poietic response (Table 2). The initial
`injection varied from 2.5 to 500 mg; if well
`
`Table 2.—Intravenous Iron
`Dextran Injections
`
`Iron Content
`per Injection, mg
`<100
`100-249
`250
`251-499
`500
`501-999
`1,000
`>1,000
`Total
`
`No. of
`Injections
`28
`176
`1,046
`34
`775
`11
`16
`13
`2,099
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Nanette LoDolce on 08/26/2014
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1009, p. 1
`
`

`
`Table 3.—Intravenous Iron
`Dextran Therapy
`
`Total Amount of
`Iron Given, mg
`2.5-499
`500-999
`1,000-1,499
`1,500-1,999
`2,000-2,499
`2,500-2,999
`3,000-3,499
`3,500-3,999
`4,000-4,999
`5,000-9,999
`10,000-15,000
`> 15,000
`Total
`
`No. of
`Patients
`78
`158
`50
`61
`63
`27
`15
`4
`10
`7
`6
`2
`481
`
`tolerated, subsequent injections contained
`250 to 500 mg. Twenty-three patients,
`however, received their entire dose (1.0 to
`2.5 g) in one injection. Ten of the 23 were
`given the iron dextran diluted in 5%
`dextrose (5% v/v) at 100 to 400 mL/hr (250
`to 1,000 mg/hr). The other 13 received the
`undiluted drug at
`1
`to 5 mL/min. The
`autotransfused patients were given 250 mg
`of iron dextran, usually diluted in 250 mL
`of 5% dextrose in water or
`in normal
`to 30-minute period
`saline over a 20-
`immediately after each phlebotomy.1
`Prisoners subjected to chronic phleboto¬
`my were given 1.25 mg of iron for each
`milliliter of RBCs phlebotomized; the iron
`dextran was injected within three to five
`minutes through the phlebotomy tube im¬
`mediately after each phlebotomy.2 Pris¬
`oners subjected to a single erythropheresis
`received 1.5 mg of undiluted iron dextran
`per milliliter of RBCs that had undergone
`erythropheresis in one bolus by syringe
`within 20 minutes.1 One prisoner
`inad¬
`vertently was injected with 20 mL of
`undiluted iron dextran in the left brachial
`artery.
`The total amount of iron injected varied
`from 2.5 mg to 29 g (Table 3). Patients
`usually received 1.5 to 3.0 g to correct
`anemia, including 1.0 g to replenish tissue
`stores of iron. The largest amounts were
`given to treat chronic uncorrectable blood
`loss, one patient receiving 29 g of
`iron.
`Autotransfused patients received 250 mg
`for each of one to five 500-mL units of
`blood phlebotomized.1 The prisoners sub¬
`jected to chronic phlebotomy received up
`to a total of 12.8 g, and those subjected to a
`single erythropheresis received up to 3.0 g
`or iron.
`
`Evaluation
`of Erythropoietic Response
`Evaluation of erythropoietic response to
`iron therapy requires measurement of the
`amount and duration of RBC loss and
`calculation of the rate of RBC production.
`To avoid inaccuracy in measurement of
`amount and duration of blood loss and
`possibly in calculation of rate of erythro-
`poiesis from increments of grams per
`deciliters per day, we report the rate of
`
`Table 4. —Rate of RBC Synthesis
`in Response to Phlebotomy and
`Intravenous Iron Dextran
`
`Increment
`RBCs,
`Above
`mL/Day Normal
`
`19*
`
`68-93
`
`3.6-4.9X
`
`Normal adult
`(70-kg man)
`Chronic phlebotomy
`in prisonerst
`Acute phlebotomy
`in prisonerst
`•Wintrobe.'
`tCorrected to that of 70-kg man."
`
`48-67
`
`2.5-3.5X
`
`RBC production only in prisoners (Table
`investigations on long-term
`4).
`In our
`phlebotomies in prisoners, stools were
`checked two to five times per week for
`occult blood loss by the guaiac technique
`and blood loss from phlebotomies was
`measured.2 Under the conditions of this
`experiment,
`the rate of RBC production
`was equal to the amount of RBCs removed
`by phlebotomy once the prisoners were
`proved by blood volume studies to be in a
`steady state.2 The rate of response to a
`single phlebotomy of one half
`to two
`thirds of the RBC volume was estimated
`from the increment in RBC volume.3 Actu¬
`ally, measurement of RBC production by
`increment in grams per deciliter per day
`yielded results similar to those we and
`others obtained by the more difficult mea¬
`surement of increments in RBC volume.
`
`Evaluation of Reactions
`Reactions to IV iron were evaluated
`personally through daily visits to patients
`hospitalized at the University of Colorado
`Medical Center. All patients treated at
`National Jewish Hospital were inpatients
`on a chest surgical service and were seen
`daily. Outpatients were seen at least week¬
`ly and close telephone contact was main¬
`tained, the patients having our office and
`home telephone numbers.
`Reactions were classified as localized or
`systemic (Table 5). Localized reactions
`were manifested by pain in the vein
`injected and by flushing, warmth, and a
`metallic taste associated with injection
`rates greater than 100 mg/min. Symptoms
`lasted less than one minute and were
`alleviated by slowing or stopping the
`injections for less than one minute. These
`injections were completed without further
`difficulty, and symptoms did not interfere
`with ordinary activity.
`Systemic reactions were subclassified as
`immediate or delayed (Table 5). Immedi¬
`ate reactions occurred within five minutes
`of injection;
`they were further classified
`as (1) life-threatening anaphylactoid reac¬
`tions characterized by hypotension, syn¬
`cope, purpura, wheezing, dyspnea, respira¬
`tory arrest, and cyanosis, lasting up to one
`hour and occurring only after the first
`
`Table 5.
`
`Reactions to Intravenous
`Iron Dextran
`
`—
`
`No reaction
`Reaction
`Localized to vein or
`caused by too rapid in¬
`jection into vein
`Systemic
`Immediate
`Life-threatening
`Non-life-threatening
`Delayed
`Severe
`Moderate
`Mild
`
`No.(%) of
`Patients
`(N=481)
`356(74)
`125(26)
`
`72(15)
`53(11)
`15(3)
`3(0.6)
`12(2)
`38(8)
`6(1)
`16(3)
`16(3)
`No.(%)of
`Injections
`(N=2,099)
`1,824(87)
`275(13)
`
`No reaction
`Reaction
`Localized to vein or
`caused by too rapid in¬
`jection into vein
`Systemic
`Immediate
`Life-threatening
`Non-life-threatening
`Delayed
`Severe
`Moderate*
`Mild
`
`185(9)
`90(4)
`16(0.7)
`3(0.1)
`13(0.6)
`74 (4)
`8(0.4)
`44(2)
`22(1.0)
`•Ten reactions in one patient with rheumatoid
`arthritis, 13 reactions in one patient with rheuma¬
`toid arthritis, and eight reactions in one patient
`with lupus erythematosus.
`
`injection; and (2) non-life-threatening re¬
`actions characterized by mild,
`transient
`hypotension, malaise, itching, and urticar¬
`ia, lasting less than five minutes and not
`otherwise interfering with normal activi¬
`ty.
`Delayed
`systemic
`reactions
`started
`within four to 48 hours of injection and
`lasted three to seven days. They were char¬
`acterized by lymphadenopathy, myalgia,
`arthralgia, fever, and headache occurring
`singly or
`in combination. The delayed
`reactions were subclassified as mild (no¬
`ticeable, but not interfering with normal
`activity), moderate (limitation of ordinary
`activity, but not requiring bed rest), and
`severe (disabling and requiring bed rest).
`systemic
`All
`reactions classified as
`severe are described in detail in Table 6.
`
`Prisoners' Rights
`The rights of
`the prisoners were re¬
`spected in conformance with the Helsinki
`the World Health Orga¬
`Declaration of
`nization and the Nuremberg Code. Ap¬
`proval was also obtained from the gover¬
`nor, attorney general, and director of
`institutions of the State of Colorado, the
`warden and psychiatrist of the Colorado
`State Penitentiary, and the next of kin of
`each volunteer.
`
`RESULTS
`Rate of RBC Production
`The rates of RBC production in
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Nanette LoDolce on 08/26/2014
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1009, p. 2
`
`

`
`Table 6.—Severe Reactions to Iron Dextran Administration
`
`Diagnoses
`
`Dose of Iron
`Dextran, mg
`
`Reaction
`_._ Subsequent Iron
`Type
`Dextran Therapy
`Onset
`Duration
`
`Respiratory arrest, hypo-
`tension, purpura
`Hypotension, cyanosis,
`dyspnea
`Syncope, wheezing, hives
`(blood pressure not re-
`corded)
`
`Arthralgia
`Arthralgia
`Myalgia, arthralgia, ery-
`thema nodosum, fever
`Myalgia, arthralgia, fever,
`headache
`
`1 min
`
`1 min
`
`1 min
`
`8 hr
`48 hr
`48 hr
`
`24 hr
`
`48 hr
`
`...
`
`48 hr
`
`4 hr
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`1 hr
`
`1 hr
`
`3 days
`3 days
`5 days
`
`3 days
`
`4 days
`
`5 days
`
`4 days
`
`None
`
`None
`
`12 injections, 10-
`250 mg each,
`without reaction
`
`None
`None
`None
`
`Undiluted, 4 injec-
`tions, 500 mg
`each without
`reaction
`None
`
`500 mg weekly for
`5 wk
`None
`
`12 hr (wheezing)
`5 days (arthralgia)
`
`None
`
`8/29/M/54
`
`9/45/M/72
`
`10/24/F/52
`
`11/46/F/47
`
`Iron deficiency, bleeding pep- 500 undiluted for
`6 consecutive days
`tic ulcer
`Blood loss research (prisoner 500 undiluted weekly
`volunteer), varicose veins
`for 11 wk
`Iron deficiency, menorrhagia
`1,200 in 5% dextrose
`in water
`2,500 in 500 mL of
`dextrose in water
`
`Iron deficiency, gastrointesti-
`nal bleeding
`
`Myalgia, arthralgia, fever,
`adenopathy
`Thrombophlebitis, pulmo-
`nary embolus
`Myalgia, arthralgia, sore
`neck, fever
`Arthralgia, adenopathy,
`wheezing, fever
`
`Table 7.—Correlation of Incidence of Patient Reactions* With Other Factors
`
`No Reaction
`
`Reaction
`
`294
`82
`
`218
`158
`
`15
`418
`
`46
`
`110
`210
`
`43
`390
`
`1,129
`902
`
`78
`26
`
`78
`27
`
`10
`38
`
`19
`39
`
`2
`46
`
`41
`27
`
`>.05t
`
`x2 (1 df)
`
`0.3104
`
`9.2776
`
`23.0484
`
`4.2517
`
`<.05
`
`5.0933
`
`1.0814
`
`0.4152
`
`<.054:
`
`>.05t
`
`>.05t
`
`Age, yr
`<55
`>55
`Sex
`
`F M
`
`Collagen vascular disease
`Present
`Absent
`Pregnancy
`Present
`Absent
`<Age 45
`All ages
`Cancer
`Present
`Absent
`Dose,§ mg
`<251
`>251
`
`"Refers only to severe and moderate delayed reactions.
`tNot significant.
`^Correlation of pregnant to nonpregnant women of all ages.
`§Number of injections producing a reaction correlated with dose.
`
`6). Some patients had more than one
`reaction (Table 5). The incidence of
`severe reactions was associated with
`doses of more than 250 mg (especially
`in patients weighing less than 50 kg),
`and these were particularly common
`in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
`and other inflammatory disease (Ta¬
`bles 5 and 6). Table 7 correlates the
`number of patients who had reactions
`with age, sex, collagen vascular dis¬
`ease, pregnancy, cancer, and dose.
`Only one reaction, a potentially lethal
`anaphylactoid reaction in patient 1
`(Table 6), occurred in the 178 patients
`
`subjected to autotransfusion at Na¬
`tional Jewish Hospital, where all
`patients with a possible personal or
`family history of a drug reaction,
`allergic rash, or rheumatoid arthritis
`were excluded. Furthermore, at this
`hospital, each injection of
`IV iron
`dextran was given over a 20-
`to
`30-minute period in 250 mL of 5%
`dextrose or normal saline.
`Two hundred seventy-five (13%) of
`the injections caused a reaction, but
`only three (0.1%) were immediate
`life-threatening and 52 (2.7%) were
`delayed severe or moderate (Table 5).
`
`normal men" and in prisoners sub¬
`jected to a single phlebotomy of one
`half to two thirds of the circulating
`RBC mass3 are listed in Table 4. The
`rate of RBC production in the pris¬
`oners subjected to repeated phle¬
`botomies varied inversely with the
`hemoglobin level induced by the phle¬
`botomies.2 Maximum production was
`3.5 to 4.9 times normal at a hemoglo¬
`bin level of about 8 g/dL. The average
`rate of erythropoiesis was 2.5 to 3.5
`in prisoners subjected
`times normal
`to one massive phlebotomy, reducing
`hemoglobin concentration to 6 to 9
`g/dL. The RBC volume rose more
`rapidly four to seven days after phle¬
`botomy, when the prisoners were
`most anemic. A lower
`rate was
`achieved 9 to 25 days after phleboto¬
`my, when the hemoglobin concentra¬
`tion was closest to normal. When a
`hemoglobin level of about 8 g/dL was
`subsequently maintained for 20 days
`by repeated phlebotomy,
`these pris¬
`oners maintained the same rate of
`RBC production1 as those bled for 9 to
`23 weeks.2
`
`Reactions
`Three hundred fifty-six (74%) of
`the patients did not have a reaction.
`One hundred twenty-five (26%) expe¬
`rienced a reaction, but only 25 (5%)
`had reactions that limited or inhib¬
`ited ordinary activity. Three (0.6%) of
`these 25 patients had life-threatening
`anaphylactoid reactions (Tables 5 and
`
`Case/Age, yr
`Sex/Weight, kg
`Potentially lethal
`1/37/M/63
`
`2/38/F/45
`
`3/55/F/49
`
`2.5 in 5% glucose/
`Mitral stenosis due to rheu-
`Ringer's
`malic fever, autotransfusion
`Iron deficiency, ulcerative co- 200 undiluted
`litis
`Rheumatoid arthritis, iron defi- 10 undiluted
`ciency, previous gastrecto-
`my
`Not potentially lethal
`4/65/F/50
`Rheumatoid arthritis
`Lupus erythematosus
`5/60/F/54
`Iron deficiency (etiology un-
`6/39/F/47
`known)
`Blood loss research (prisoner 1,500 undiluted
`volunteer)
`
`200 undiluted
`500 undiluted
`500 undiluted
`
`7/27/M/59
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Nanette LoDolce on 08/26/2014
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1009, p. 3
`
`

`
`One patient with rheumatoid arthri¬
`tis and one with lupus erythematosus
`accounted for two of the eight (0.3% )
`severe, not potentially lethal
`reac¬
`tions (Table 6); neither was retreated
`with iron dextran. Thirty-one of the
`44 moderate delayed reactions oc¬
`curred in two patients with rheuma¬
`toid arthritis and in one patient with
`lupus erythematosus (Table 5). These
`three patients requested that treat¬
`ment with IV iron dextran be contin¬
`ued because the benefit from treat¬
`ment of
`the anemia exceeded the
`transient discomfort from the reac¬
`tions. Doses of 50 mg did not cause a
`reaction in these three patients; doses
`of 100 mg caused arthralgia and
`myalgia that was not disabling; doses
`of 250 mg caused disabling pain for a
`day or two. When the first injection
`did not cause a reaction, subsequent
`injections of the same size and at the
`same or lower rate did not cause a
`reaction, provided the plasma had
`been cleared of iron dextran from the
`previous injection.
`Iron dextran is
`cleared with a half-life of about three
`days,5 making weekly intervals ac¬
`ceptable.
`Severe and moderate delayed reac¬
`tion (Tables 5 and 6), such as fever,
`arthralgia, myalgia, and adenopathy,
`did not necessarily preclude further
`injections. Indeed, we have observed
`that an injection early in the course
`caused an appreciably greater reac¬
`tion than the same-size injection giv¬
`en later in the course of treatment.
`We gave an iron dextran injection to
`one patient (No. 3) in whom hives had
`developed after a previous injection
`(Table 6). Another patient, not
`in¬
`cluded in Table 6, who had hives and
`itching with oral and intramuscular
`iron dextran, was subsequently suc¬
`cessfully treated IV with a series
`injections of
`of
`iron dextran, each
`preceded by injections of 50 mg
`of diphenhydramine hydrochloride
`(Benadryl) two or three minutes prior
`to each injection of iron dextran.
`A 47-year-old woman with rheumatic
`heart disease had well-established iron
`deficiency due to peptic ulcer disease and
`could not
`tolerate oral
`iron because of
`gastrointestinal distress, hives, pruritus,
`and tachycardia. After premedication with
`50 mg of diphenhydramine hydrochloride,
`25 mg of iron dextran was given IV. Full
`resuscitative resources were immediately
`at hand. Vital signs did not change, and
`only two hives were noted within 20 min¬
`the succeeding week, daily
`utes. Over
`infusions of IV iron dextran were given,
`
`the dose gradually increasing to 250 mg
`per injection, each dose preceded by 50 mg
`of diphenhydramine hydrochloride. The
`patient was discharged after a total of
`1,250 mg of iron had been given, and she
`responded with an increase in hemoglobin
`level from 6.5 to 12.5 g/dL in three weeks.
`A single inadvertent
`intra-arteri-
`injection of 1,000 mg of undiluted
`al
`iron dextran over a 20-minute period
`caused marked redness, warmth, and
`tingling in the hand and arm distal to
`the brachial artery injection site dur¬
`ing the infusion. These were gone 20
`minutes after the injection, and there
`was no delayed reaction.
`COMMENT
`therapy for
`iron deficiency
`Ideal
`recognition
`anemia
`includes
`and
`its etiology and rapid
`treatment of
`restoration to normal of hemoglobin
`value and tissue iron in a safe, pain¬
`less, cheap, and convenient manner.
`Rate of RBC Production and
`Delivery of Iron to Erythroblasts
`for Hemoglobin Synthesis
`A rate of RBC production of ten to
`times normal,
`requiring daily
`12
`delivery of 200 to 240 mg of iron to
`erythroblasts,
`is theoretically feasi¬
`ble. Less than half this rate, requiring
`daily delivery of about 100 mg of iron
`to erythroblasts, was achieved in the
`long-term experiments on prisoners
`(Table 4), probably due to the lack of
`intense enough erythropoietic
`an
`stimulus, because hemoglobin concen¬
`tration was not maintained below 8
`g/dL.2 In prisoners subjected to a
`single large erythropheresis, an aver¬
`age rate of 3.0 times normal was
`achieved (Table 4).
`In patients whose hemoglobin con¬
`centration is 9 g/dL or higher,
`the
`maximal rate of hemoglobin synthe¬
`sis likely to be achieved is only two to
`2.5 times normal,2"
`requiring daily
`delivery of only 40 to 50 mg of iron to
`erythroblasts. If the hemoglobin con¬
`centration is lower than 9.0 g/dL, this
`rate reaches four to five times nor¬
`mal, requiring daily delivery of about
`100 mg of iron to erythroblasts. These
`calculations of RBC and hemoglobin
`synthetic rates assume that there are
`no conditions (fever, malnutrition,
`infection, malignancy, chronic in¬
`flammatory disease,
`renal
`insuffi¬
`ciency) depressing the erythropoietic
`response to the anemia. It is therefore
`probable that daily delivery of more
`than 100 mg of iron to erythroblasts
`
`is necessary only as long as hemoglo¬
`than 9
`bin concentration is
`less
`g/dL.
`Normally, about 95% of the 19 to 21
`mg of iron delivered daily to erythro¬
`blasts is derived from destruction of
`RBCs, and the remainder from tissue
`iron stores. In contrast, in the patient
`with chronic iron deficiency, there is
`a progressive decrease in the rate of
`delivery of iron to erythroblasts due
`to the chronic blood loss because
`progressively fewer RBCs
`survive
`long enough to die of
`senescent
`hemolysis2 and tissue iron stores are
`depleted prior to recognition of ane¬
`mia.' Therefore, with increasing se¬
`verity and duration of iron deficiency
`these two major sources of
`anemia,
`iron yield progressively less iron for
`hemoglobin synthesis, and medical
`iron becomes an increasingly impor¬
`tant source of iron needed for hemo¬
`globin synthesis.67
`In the average patient, a maximum
`of 50 mg of
`iron may be absorbed
`daily following the ingestion of fer¬
`rous sulfate.8 The amount of
`iron
`absorbed from a single dose of oral
`iron varies with the dosage of iron.
`The highest single dose given was 100
`mg, 38 mg of which was absorbed.
`Higher doses and the depressant
`effect of a single dose on absorption
`of subsequent doses were not investi¬
`gated. Hillman and Henderson,6 how¬
`ever, were able to induce four male
`volunteers to consume 300 mg of
`ferrous gluconate every two hours
`while awake (eight
`to nine doses
`daily), an amount most patients can¬
`volunteers
`These
`not
`consume.
`achieved a 2.9 to 4.0-fold increase in
`rate of RBC production,
`requiring
`absorption of 60 to 80 mg of
`iron,
`depending on availability of iron from
`tissue stores and hemolysis of senes¬
`to hemoglobinate the
`cent RBCs,
`RBCs formed. Actually, absorption is
`often less than 40 mg daily because of
`the following factors:
`failure to
`(1)
`ingest iron due to unreliability or lack
`of cooperation and, especially
`in
`patients with gastrointestinal inflam¬
`matory disease, pain and diarrhea (as
`much as 40% of oral
`iron prescribed
`by physicians is not
`ingested);
`(2)
`interference with absorption of iron
`by consumption of antacids, clay,
`high grain diet, and antibiotics like
`tetracycline910;
`inflammatory dis¬
`(3)
`ease of the gastrointestinal tract such
`as regional enteritis; (4) rapid transit
`time, as in ulcerative colitis or any
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Nanette LoDolce on 08/26/2014
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1009, p. 4
`
`

`
`other cause of diarrhea; and (5) by
`surgically
`abnormalities.
`induced
`Consequently, when the patient's he¬
`moglobin concentration is 9.0 g/dL or
`higher, oral iron will ensure hemoglo¬
`bin and RBC synthesis at a maximal
`rate provided that none of the factors
`limiting iron absorption are opera¬
`tive. When the patient with iron
`deficiency anemia has a hemoglobin
`concentration below 9 g/dL, except
`under optimal conditions of
`iron
`absorption and by highly motivated
`iron alone will not
`volunteers, oral
`but parenteral
`iron will maintain
`hemoglobin and RBC synthesis at a
`rate. The clinical signifi¬
`maximal
`cance of
`rate of RBC
`this greater
`formation following IV rather than
`oral iron therapy lasting only as long
`as the hemoglobin concentration is
`less than 9 g/dL is questionable.
`Restoration and Utilization
`of Tissue Iron
`According to Bentley and Jacobs,"
`normal serum ferritin levels, an indi¬
`tissue iron, were
`rect measure of
`observed two months after a normal
`hemoglobin level was attained and
`four months after initiation of oral
`iron therapy. The definition of nor¬
`malcy used probably included some
`individuals having a deficit or even
`absence of tissue iron.12 In contrast to
`reple¬
`findings,
`Bentley and Jacobs'
`tion of tissue stores may require as
`long as six months of continuous oral
`iron therapy.13
`for erythro-
`Tissue iron is useful
`poiesis only if it is transferrable at an
`rate to erythroblasts when
`optimal
`iron is not available from senescent
`RBCs or therapeutic iron; the amount
`of tissue iron merely defines the total
`amount that is eventually available
`for hemoglobin synthesis. Tissue iron
`is not optimally available in hemo-
`chromatosis after multiple phle¬
`botomies, in pernicious anemia after
`treatment with cyanocobalamin,
`in
`prisoners given a single dose of IV
`iron dextran as recently as six weeks
`prior to erythropheresis of one half to
`two thirds of their RBC volume,3 and
`in patients and volunteers with a
`recurrence of iron deficiency anemia
`previously treated with IV or oral
`iron.13 Gradual conversion of ferritin
`to less readily mobilizable hemosider-
`in parallels increase in duration and
`amount of
`tissue iron.7 Therefore,
`more clinically significant
`informa¬
`tion concerning availability of
`iron
`
`for hemoglobin synthesis is obtained
`from plasma iron concentration than
`from the amount of tissue iron.
`In contrast to Pritchard and Ma¬
`son,14 Haskins et al15 and Mundow'6
`iron therapy is
`determined that oral
`inadequate to provide enough tissue
`iron to treat recurrent blood loss.17
`These observations may be summa¬
`(1)
`tissue iron is
`rized as follows:
`more likely to be replenished by IV
`than oral medication if more IV iron
`is given than required to reconstitute
`the hemoglobin mass; (2) the longer
`IV iron is stored in tissue (starting
`about six weeks after injection), the
`less readily available this iron is for
`hemoglobin synthesis; (3) the greater
`the availability of medicinal iron, the
`less important is the availability of
`tissue iron in the treatment of iron
`the more intense the
`(4)
`deficiency;
`erythropoietic stimulus (varying with
`the severity of the anemia), the great¬
`er is the potential rate of RBC forma¬
`tion and the higher is the rate of
`delivery of iron required to hemoglo-
`binate the RBC being formed; and (5)
`normal men (whose tissues contain
`about 600 mg of readily mobilizable
`iron as ferritin and 600 mg of slowly
`mobilizable iron as hemosiderin, and
`who can absorb a maximum of about
`5 mg of food iron daily) are unable to
`compensate for iron lost by one phle¬
`botomy a week (225 mg of iron) for
`longer than about five weeks. Because
`of less tissue iron, most women are
`unable to compensate for longer than
`about two weeks.
`
`Reactions to Iron Dextran
`The 72 localized reactions (Table 5)
`were due to too rapid injection of IV
`iron dextran and were preventable by
`decreasing the rate of injection; none
`occurred in the National Jewish Hos¬
`patients. Reactions
`pital
`severe
`enough to interfere with normal
`activity,
`that
`is,
`those classified as
`life-threatening immediate, or mod¬
`erate or severe delayed reactions,
`occurred in 25 patients (Table 5).
`Although the moderate or severe
`delayed reactions result in disability,
`the immediate severe anaphylactoid
`reactions, which are potentially lethal
`and unpredictable (Tables 5 and 6),
`are the major problem. The mecha¬
`nism causing these potentially lethal
`reactions is unknown; clinically, they
`anaphylactoid
`reactions
`resemble
`seen after administration of radio-
`contrast materials and so are proba-
`
`bly caused by release of mediators
`such as histamine from mast cells.
`The release may be related to specific
`cells, direct
`IgE bound to mast
`complement activation, or direct ef¬
`fect on mast cells. These severe,
`reactions
`should
`be
`immediate
`treated as an anaphylactic reaction
`antihistamines,
`epinephrine,
`with
`corticosteroids, methyl
`xanthines,
`and supportive measures. They were
`rare in this study, occurring in only
`three of 2,099 injections and three of
`the 481 subjects.
`The severe delayed reactions (Table
`6) were usually associated with large
`doses of iron dextran given to rela¬
`tively small patients. The symptom
`complex resembles a serum sickness
`reaction. Another explanation is that
`since iron dextran can circulate unal¬
`tered for several days,17 daily injec¬
`tions may cause progressive increase
`in plasma concentrations, accounting
`for the appearance of reactions after
`a few days of daily injections of
`relatively large doses. Decreasing the
`dose to 250 mg or less per injection
`and increasing the interval between
`injections has resulted in a decrease
`in incidence and severity of this type
`of reaction.
`Reactions observed after IV iron
`dextran resemble those observed af¬
`ter intramuscular iron dextran. We
`have seen identical reactions to IV
`and intramuscular
`iron dextran as
`well as to IV dextriferron.
`Serious toxic reactions to oral iron
`are very rare. Gastrointestinal
`intol¬
`erance itself is not particularly dan¬
`gerous, but it is a common cause of
`failure to ingest the prescribed iron, a
`reported to the
`decision often not
`physician and in one series occurring
`in 32% of patients.18 Oral
`iron tends
`to aggravate gastrointestinal distress
`in patients with inflammatory bowel
`disease. A serious and even lethal
`problem is ingestion of iron by chil¬
`dren, one of the most common causes
`of childhood death by poisoning. The
`higher incidence of reactions with IV
`than with oral iron must be weighed
`the advantages of IV iron
`against
`dextran over oral and intramuscular
`iron (Table 8).
`Indications for IV Iron Dextran
`The indications for use of IV iron
`dextran (Table 9) are based on com¬
`parison of the advantages and disad¬
`vantages of IV vs intramuscular and
`oral iron listed in Table 8.
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Nanette LoDolce on 08/26/2014
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1009, p. 5
`
`

`
`Advantages and
`Table 8.
`Disadvantages of Intravenous
`Iron Dextran
`
`—
`
`Advantages
`Intravenous vs intramuscular iron
`More rapid hemoglobin production
`when severely anemic (hemoglo¬
`bin level, <9 g/dL)
`More rapid hemoglobin production
`when continuously bleeding
`Less pain and irritation
`Intravenous vs oral
`iron
`More rapid hemoglobin production
`when severely anemic (hemoglo¬
`bin level, <9 g/dL)
`More rapid hemoglobin production
`when continuously bleeding
`Saturation of tissue stores
`Elimination of dangerous drug from
`the home
`Avoidance of gastrointestinal intoler¬
`ance
`Circumvention of malabsorption
`Assurance of adequate treatment of
`the unreliable and/or uncoopera¬
`tive patient
`Disadvantages
`Intravenous vs intramuscular iron
`Technically more difficult to adminis¬
`ter, especially in babies and in
`adults with poor veins
`Burning along vein and flushing if in¬
`jected too rapidly
`iron
`Intravenous vs oral
`Frequency, unpredictable occur¬
`rence and potentially lethal nature
`of anaphylactoid (anaphylactic?)
`reactions
`Less convenience
`Allergic reactions
`
`Indication for Intravenous
`Table 9.
`Iron Dextran Treatment of
`Iron Deficiency Anemia
`
`—
`
`Commonly Recognized Indications
`Oral
`iron intolerance
`Chronic uncorrected bleeding
`Malabsorption
`Unreliable or uncooperative patient
`inflammatory disease
`Gastrointestinal
`(ulcer, colitis, enteritis)
`Coagulation disorders (hemophilia,
`thrombocytopenia)
`Recently Recognized Indications
`Renal dialysis
`High intake of antacids, clay, grain
`diet
`Autotransfusion or repeated use of
`single donor
`Uncorrected operative blood loss
`Questionable Indications
`Depleted tissue stores (all patients
`with chronic iron deficiency)
`
`Table 9 lists the indications for IV
`iron dextran. Recently
`recognized
`indications deserve comment. Pa¬
`tients undergoing hemodialysis have
`a negative iron balance of 1 to 2 g of
`iron yearly. Usually, oral iron cannot
`be relied on to correct this negative
`iron balance," presumably because of
`interference with absorption by ant-
`acids.10 Reactions to IV iron dextran
`in this kind of patien

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket