throbber
07-07-14;09:02
`
`Phar'"macosmos AS
`
`# 11/ 22
`
`NEPHfCt'.J
`
`Original Paper
`
`Nephron 2002;92:316-323
`
`Accepted: December 12, 2001
`
`Experience with the Use of an Iron Polymaltose
`(Dextrin) Complex Given by Single Total Dose
`Infusion to Stable Chronic Haemodialysis
`Patients
`
`Roal van Zyl-Smit Janet A. Halkett
`
`Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
`
`Key Words
`Intravenous iron ·Total dose infusion • Haemodialysis.
`Iron polymaltose • Iron dextrin
`
`Abstract
`Background: Many studies of anaemia in patients on
`chronic haemodialysis have noted a high prevalence of
`iron deficiency despite oral iron supplementation. Our
`study examined the effect of intravenous iron given as
`bolus replacement. As the majority of these patients
`were not receiving concurrent recombinant human
`erythropoietin (rhEPO) It allowed an analysis of the safe(cid:173)
`ty and efficacy of intravenous iron as a single agent.
`Methods: All patients with a haemoglobin level of less
`than 10 g/dl and considered iron deficient by the finding
`of a percentage transferrin saturation of less than 20%
`were given intravenous iron in the form of iron polymal(cid:173)
`tose (dextrin) by total dose infusion (TOI). The dose was
`calculated from tables supplied by the manufacturers.
`Patients with serum ferritin levels in excess of 225 ng/ml
`were excluded. Results: In our unit, 62 out of BO (77%)
`patients were considered iron deficient and received IV
`iron. Ten (10%) were considered to be in iron balance
`
`and 8 (10%) had biochemistry suggesting iron overload.
`None of the patients receiving iron experienced any
`adverse reactions. At three months a rise in haemoglo(cid:173)
`bin level of at least 1 g/dl was noted in 53% of patients.
`The response was less in the remainder, but only 2
`showed no response. Conclusions: Low levels of iron
`deficiency are often unrecognized in chronic haemodial(cid:173)
`ysls patients on conventional therapy including oral Iron
`supplementation. In such patients, the use of total dose
`infusion of iron polymaltose (dextrin) is a safe and effec(cid:173)
`tive method of raising haemoglobin levels. Substantial
`improvements may be achieved without the concurrent
`use of rhEPO.
`
`Copyright c 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
`
`Introduction
`
`Anaemia is almost always present in patients with
`severe chronic renal failure [I]. Its assessment and man(cid:173)
`agement becomes more complex once chronic haemodial(cid:173)
`ysis (HD) is initiated. Factors such as inadequate dialysis,
`defective utilization of iron sequestered in body iron
`stores, poor absorption of dietary iron, gastrointestinal
`
`KAR.GEi\
`Fax+41613061234
`E-Mail kargcr@kargcr.ch
`www.kargcr.com
`
`© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
`00211-2166/02/0922-031m8.50/o
`
`Al:l:cssiblc onlinc at:
`WIVIV. kargcr.comljournalslner
`
`R. van Zyl.Smit
`Renal Unit Ell
`Groote Schuur Hospital
`ObscrvatoJY, 7935 (South Arrica)
`Tel +27 21 448 2349, Fax +27 21 <404 3318, E·Mail vzsmit@curic.uct.ac.za
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 1
`
`

`
`07-07-14;09:02
`
`Pharmacosmos AS
`
`# 12/ 22
`
`blood and dialysis-related blood loss [2, 3], aluminum tox(cid:173)
`icity [4], bone marrow fibrosis, vitamin and iron deficien(cid:173)
`cy have been implicated.
`With inadequate dialysis, anaemia requiring repeated
`blood transfusions may develop and in the past has
`resulted in iron overload in up to 25% of cases [l]. With
`modem dialysis and adequate attention to all reversible
`causes of anaemia, patients on chronic HD should have
`haemoglobin levels of at least 8 g/dl and with the addition(cid:173)
`al use of recombinant erythropoietin (rhEPO), normal
`haemoglobin levels may be obtained [5]. With intensive
`rhEPO therapy, insufficient iron both in the form of inad(cid:173)
`equate stores or 'functional iron deficiency' may become
`the major limiting factor in achieving optimal haemoglo(cid:173)
`bin levels [6]. With functional iron deficiency biologic
`availability of iron is reduced despite the presence of ade(cid:173)
`quate storage iron. It may be demonstrated clinically by a
`response to IV iron in some patients with ferritin levels as
`high as 1,000 ng/ml [5, 6].
`In our unit the use of rhEPO is severely limited
`because of fmancial restrictions. We were therefore able
`to examine the response to and safety of total dose iron
`infusion of an iron dextrin preparation given to a group of
`iron deficient patients not receiving concurrent rhEPO.
`
`Patients and Methods
`
`Iron deficiency was defined by transfcrrin (TO saturation levels of
`less than 20%, in the presence of a scrum fcrritin level of less than
`225 nglml. The following were routinely measured: scrum iron (SI),
`total iron binding capacity (TIBC), mean cell volume (MCV), mean
`cell haemoglobin (MCH), plasma albumin, calcium, inorganic phos(cid:173)
`phate, alkaline phosphatase and, if hypcrparathyroidism was sus(cid:173)
`pected, serum parathyroid (PTH) levels. As a measure of dialysis effi(cid:173)
`cacy, a urea reduction ratio (URR) was done and expressed as a per(cid:173)
`centage. All blood samples were taken immediately before dialysis.
`
`Patients
`Of 80 patients, 62 (77%) were defined as being 'iron deficient'
`with the remainder having either normal or elevated iron levels. The
`62 iron deficient patients were given intravenous iron by TDI and
`included in the study on efficacy and safety. During the study, 26
`patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis for the following
`reasons: patients receiving renal transplants (4); blood transfusions
`given during follow-up (6); medical dialysis problems (4); rhEPO
`commenced as part of another study (6); death (1); incomplete data
`(2) and iron not given according to the protocol (3). None of the
`patients entered into the safety analysis were excluded.
`The response to iron was studied in 36 patients including two
`patients who received rhEPO at a constant dose for the duration of
`the study, called the study group (SO). Patients who experienced a
`rise in haemoglobin, by the end of the study period, in excess of 1 gtdl
`were designated as the responder group {RG) and the remainder as
`
`the non-responder group (NRG). The SO consisted of 12 males and
`24 females with a mean age of 40 years (range 20-61 years). mean
`duration on dialysis before the study was 27 months (range 1-127
`months). mean numberofunits of blood given before the study was 6
`(range 0-43 units), mean urea reduction ratio for the group was 67%
`(range 48-84%), mean serum albumin was 41 g/) (range 32-48 g/)),
`mean scrum alkaline phosphatase 126 u/I (range 37-993 u/I) (normal
`range 30-11 S u/l).
`On completion of each dialysis session, patients routinely re(cid:173)
`ceived vitamin C, folic acid, vitamin B complex, vitamin B12 and
`200 mg of iron as oral ferrous sulphate. Calcium carbonate was the
`preferred phosphate binder except where elevated calcium levels
`necessitated the use of aluminum hydroxide (17 patients). Twenty
`two patients were taking I-alpha hydroxy vitamin D3 to elevate
`scrum calcium and suppress parathyroid hormone secretion. Nine
`patients had previously undergone parathyroidcctomics for tertiary
`hypcrparathyroidism. Fifteen patients had radiologic evidence of
`renal ostcodystrophy. PTH levels ranged from 5 to 1,000 pgfml,
`mean 400 pg/ml (normal range 12-72 pg/ml).
`
`Laboratory Methods
`SI was determined by an automated system (BM/Hitachi System
`704). TIBC was done by saturating transfcrrin binding sites with iron
`added to plasma. Excess unbound iron is then removed and plasma
`iron is measured by the assay for SI as described above. Scrum ferri(cid:173)
`tin was assayed using an immunoturbidomctire method in an auto(cid:173)
`mated system (fina-quant®, Boehringer Mannheim). All tests were
`done at the start of the study and thereafter on a monthly basis. Urea
`Reduction Ratios (URR) were done three-monthly, using the formu(cid:173)
`la:
`
`URR = Prc-Post/Pn: x 100%
`(where Pre= urea level at commencement of dialysis and Post= urea
`level 10 min after completion of dialysis).
`
`Treatment Regimen
`Patients were treated with an iron polymaltose (dextrin) prepara(cid:173)
`tion (Ferrimcd®, Vifor International Inc., Switzerland). The dose
`required was calculated according to body mass and· haemoglobin
`concentration using a table supplied by the manufacturer and was
`given as a total dose infusion (I'DI). The dosage required ranged
`from 18 to64ml (900-3,200 mg of iron) and was diluted in 500mlof
`normal saline and infused over a 4-hour period during a dialysis ses(cid:173)
`sion.
`
`Cli11ical Mo11itori11gfor Adverse Reactions
`Blood pressure and pulse were measured hourly during the 4-hour
`dialysis period and temperature at commencement and at the end of
`the 4-hour infusion. Patients were told to report any symptoms that
`developed during or after the infusion period or between dialysis ses(cid:173)
`sions.
`
`Statistics
`Data arc reported as mean ± SD, graphs arc mean ± 1 SE.
`Hypotheses about differences between means were analyzed using a
`paired t test (significance: p < 0.05).
`
`Total Dose Iron Infusion in Hacmodialysis
`Patients
`
`Ncphron 2002;92:316-323
`
`317
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 2
`
`

`
`07-07-14;09:02
`
`Pharmacosmos AS
`
`# 13/ 22
`
`10
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`~
`
`Cll c :c
`
`.!2
`Cl
`0
`E
`G>
`Ill :c
`
`_ ... .------~····-·········-·---·--····---····-··
`
`--;c
`
`6
`
`Fig. 1. Response in haemoglobin after total
`dose infusion (means ± SE). 0 = Whole
`study group {SO), n = 36; A = response
`group (RO), n = 19; x =non-response group
`(NRG), n .. 17. • p < 0.05 baseline versus
`month after infusion; .. p < 0.001 baseline
`versus month after infusion.
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`Time, months
`
`q:
`m
`E
`~
`~
`~ u
`c
`Ill
`CD
`:E
`
`BB
`
`87
`
`85
`
`83
`
`81
`
`79
`
`77
`
`75
`
`Fig. 2. Response in mean cell volume
`(MCV) after total dose infusion (means ±
`SE). 0 = Whole study group {SG), n = 36;
`A = response group (RG), n = 19; x =non(cid:173)
`response group (NRG), n = 17. • p < 0.05
`baseline versus month after infusion; •• p <
`0.00 I baseline versus month after infusion.
`
`/·"'··
`/
`...... ,"
`
`'/
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`'
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`lime, months
`
`8
`
`Results
`
`The Effect of Iron Infusion on Haemoglobin
`Concentration
`Three months after the total dose infusion in the SG,
`n = 36, 19 patients (53%) had experienced a rise in hae(cid:173)
`moglobin of at least I g/dl and were defined as the RG.
`The remaining 17 (47%) formed the NRG (fig. 1).
`Only two patients of the entire study group failed to
`show at least some rise in haemoglobin, one remained
`
`unchanged and the other had a drop in haemoglobin of
`1 gldl. Twelve patients attained haemoglobin levels of
`greater than 10 gldl.
`
`The Effect of Iron Infusion on Mean Cell Volumes,
`Mean Cell Haemoglobin, Transferrin Saturation and
`Serum Ferritin (fig. 2-5)
`Rises in MCV ranged from a minimum of 4 fl (in(cid:173)
`cluded are some patients with starting MCV of as high as
`92 fl) to a maximum rise of 16 fl. Changes in MCH were
`
`318
`
`Ncphron 2002;92:316-323
`
`van Zyl-Smit/Halkett
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 3
`
`

`
`07-07-14;09:02
`
`Pharmacosmos AS
`
`# 14/ 22
`
`1500
`
`i 1000
`c :e "t: .e
`
`500
`
`E
`:I
`,j
`
`Fig. 3. Response in mean cell haemoglobin
`(MCH) after total dose infusion (means ±
`I SE). 0 = Whole study group (SG), n = 36;
`A = response group (RG), n = 19; x = non(cid:173)
`response group (NRG), n = 17. • p < 0.05
`baseline versus month after infusion; •• p <
`0.001 baseline versus month after infusion.
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`lime, months
`
`6
`
`31
`
`~
`c
`:a
`0
`Cl
`0
`E 29
`m
`al
`.c
`=ii u
`c
`Ill m
`~
`
`27
`
`Fig. 4. Response in transfcrrin saturation
`after total dose infusion (means ± l SE). O =
`Whole study group (SG), n = 36; A =
`response group (RG), n • 19; x = non(cid:173)
`response group (NRG), n = 17. • p < 0.05
`baseline versus month after infusion; ** p <
`0.00 l baseline versus month after infusion.
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`Time, months
`
`6
`
`similar to those seen with the MCV. By 6 months Tf satu(cid:173)
`ration had dropped to below 20% in 13 patients and ferri(cid:173)
`tin to below 225 ng/ml in 15.
`In order to determine if factors were present which
`might affect the magnitude of the response, RG was fur(cid:173)
`ther subdivided into RG 1 (12 patients), a group with a
`haemoglobin rise of at least 2 g/dl and group RG2 (7
`patients) with a haemoglobin rise of at least 3 g/dl (ta-
`
`ble 1). Besides the rise in haemoglobin, other differences
`were small and conf med to a slightly higher starting hae(cid:173)
`moglobin and MCV in the NRG. Indices of iron balance
`were similar. A comparison of baseline parameters was
`also made (table 2). By comparison to the NRG, the RG
`had fewer units of transfused blood (3.1 vs. 8.6), had high(cid:173)
`er serum albumin levels (42.5 vs. 39.7 g/l) and slightly less
`efficient dialysis as reflected by a lower URR.
`
`Total Dose Iron Infusion in Hacmodialysis
`Patients
`
`Ncphron 2002;92:316-323
`
`319
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 4
`
`

`
`07-07-14;09 : 02
`
`Pharmacosmos AS
`
`# 15/ 22
`
`Fig. 5. Response in serum fcrritin after total
`dose infusion (means ± I SE). 0 = Whole
`study group (SG), n = 36; A. = response
`group (RG), n = 19; x .. non-response group
`(NRG), n = 17. • p < 0.05 baseline versus
`month after infusion;•• p < 0.001 baseline
`versus month after infusion.
`
`Table 1. Response to intravenous iron
`
`40
`
`..,. 30
`c
`0 ... f
`::1 m 20
`c
`'E
`~ c:
`IQ F 10
`
`0
`
`2
`
`3
`llme, months
`
`6
`
`RG
`n= 19
`
`6.9 (1.3)
`8.2 (1.0)
`9.1 (1.5)
`9.5 (l.5)
`8.8 (1.5)
`
`79 (9.5)
`84 (6.9)
`87 (7.2)
`87 (7.4)
`86 (10.2)
`
`27.3 (2.7)
`29.1 (2.3)
`29.9 (2.8)
`30.l (2.6)
`28.6 (2.3)
`
`Haemoglobin (Bl)
`Month 1
`Montb2
`Month 3
`Month6
`
`MCV(BI)
`Month 1
`Month2
`Montb3
`Month6
`
`MCH(Bl)
`Month 1
`Month2
`Month3
`Month 6
`
`Transfcrrin sat (Bl)
`Month I
`Month2
`Month3
`Month6
`
`12.2 (4.4)
`37.4(21.4)
`30.5 (15.8)
`24.7 (7.6)
`20.3 (8.7)
`
`RG1
`n= 121
`
`6.4(1.2)
`8.0 (1.1)
`9.0 (1.8)
`9.6(1.8)
`9.0 (1.7)
`
`77 (10)
`83 (6.5)
`86 (7.0)
`86 (6.8)
`84 (9.8)
`
`26.9 (2.3)
`26.0 (2.2)
`29.1 (2.5)
`29.9 (2.2)
`29.4(2.0)
`
`12 (4.3)
`37 (22.7)
`34 (17.5)
`25 (6.3)
`19 (8.9)
`
`RG1
`n=7
`
`6.2 (1.2)
`8.4 (I. I)
`9.6 (2.2)
`10 (2.1)
`8.9 (2.0)
`
`76 (13)
`82 (7.9)
`86 (9.1)
`85 (8.3)
`84 (11.7)
`
`27.0 (1.2)
`29.2 (1.4)
`29.3 (1.9)
`29.7 (2.3)
`30.0 (1.1)
`
`11 (4.1)
`31 (12.8)
`31 (4.2)
`24 (4.1)
`20 (10.7)
`
`Serum fcrritin (Bl)
`Month 1
`Month2
`Month3
`Month 6
`
`74(69)
`63 (60)
`1,069 (481) 1,099 (534)
`712 (477)
`838 (518)
`688 (527)
`606 (451)
`521 (664)
`819 (1,013)
`
`71 (73)
`750 (429)
`713 (404)
`927 (647)
`250(332)
`
`NRG
`n= 17
`
`7.7 (1.5)
`7.9 (1.7)
`8.2 (2.0)
`7.7 (1.6)
`7.3 (1.9)
`
`81 (6.8)
`85 (6.3)
`89 (4.9)
`90 (5.9)
`87 (4.0)
`
`28.3 (2.5)
`28.8 (2.2)
`30.3 (2.5)
`30.7 (2.5)
`29.0(2.8)
`
`TG
`n=S5
`
`6.9 (1.3)
`8.1 (1.3)
`8.9 (1.8)
`9.0 (1.7)
`8.4 (1.7)
`
`78.8 (9.2)
`83.8 (6.8)
`87.3 (6.7)
`87.5 (6.9)
`85.6 (8.4)
`
`27.5 (2.4)
`29.0(2.1)
`29.8 (2.5)
`30.2 (2.4)
`29.1 (2.2)
`
`12.3 (4.6)
`35.8 (19.8)
`31.2 (12.7)
`25.1 (7.6)
`20.2(8.6)
`
`13 (5.4)
`35 (19)
`30 (9.5)
`26 (10)
`21 (7.4)
`72 (52)
`69 (61)
`1,320 (1,581) 1,113 (826)
`690 (452)
`733 (469)
`651 (641)
`679 (551)
`517 (598)
`408 (342)
`
`RG =Responding group; RG 1 =mean haemoglobin response of>2 g/dl; RG2 =mean
`haemoglobin response of>3 g/dl; NRG= mean haemoglobin rise of<l g/dl; TG =total
`group; Bl =baseline. Data are mean (SD).
`
`320
`
`Ncphron 2002;92:316-323
`
`van Zyl-SmiVHalkett
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 5
`
`

`
`07-07-14;09:02
`
`Phar-macosmos AS
`
`# 16/ 22
`
`Table 2. Comparison of baseline
`parameters between different response
`groups
`
`RG
`n = 19
`
`6.9 (1.3)
`[4.2-8.7)
`79 (9.4)
`[53-93)
`27 (2.7)
`[24-33)
`12 (4.4)
`[6-20)
`63 (61)
`[10-208)
`
`13(68%)
`6 (32%)
`
`RG1
`n = 12
`
`6.3 (1.2)
`[4.2-79)
`78 (10.3)
`[53-93)
`26.9 (2.3)
`[24-31)
`12 (4.3)
`[6-20]
`75 (69.3)
`[10-208)
`
`9(69%)
`4(31 %)
`
`RG2
`n=7
`
`6.2 (1.2)
`[4.7-7.4)
`16 (13.2)
`[53-93]
`21 (1.2)
`[26-28)
`11 (4.1)
`[6-16)
`71 (73.4)
`[10-208]
`
`6 (86%)
`1 (14%)
`
`33 (1-127)
`8.6(0-43)
`118 (37-727)
`39.7 (32-47)
`70(54-84)
`
`38.7 (1-127)
`8.8(0-41)
`139 (37-727)
`38.9 (32-43)
`71 (54-79)
`
`60.1 (2-127)
`12.4 (0-41)
`91 (42-149)
`37 .8 (32-421)
`74 (59-79)
`
`NRG
`n= 17
`
`7.6 (1.5)
`[5-11)
`81 (6.8)
`[70-92)
`28.3 (2.5)
`[23-32)
`13 (5.4)
`[6-20)
`72 (52.4)
`[9-204)
`
`11 (65%)
`6 (35%)
`21.8 (3-53)
`3.1 (0-17)
`134 (37-993)
`42.5 (36-48)
`65 (53-79)
`
`Haemoglobin, g.ldl
`
`MCV,tl
`
`MCH,pg
`
`Saturation, %
`
`Scrum fcrritin, ng.lml
`
`Females, n (%)
`Malcs,n(%)
`
`Months on dialysis
`Units of blood
`Alk phosphatase, IU
`Albumin, gl)
`Urea reduction ratio
`
`RG =Responding group; RG1 =mean haemoglobin response of>l gfdl; RG2 =mean
`haemoglobin response of> 3 g.tdl; NRG= mean haemoglobin rise of< I gf di. Data arc mean,
`mean (SD), or [range].
`
`Table 3. Prevalence ofhypcrparathyrodism
`
`Radiologic evidence
`ofhypcrparatbyroid
`bone disease
`
`Alkaline phosphatase
`mean (SD)
`
`Study group (SG), n = 36
`Respondergroup (RS), n = 19
`Non-responders (NRG), n = 17
`
`17 (47%)
`10(53%)
`7 (41%)
`
`126 (186)
`118 (150)
`135 (225)
`
`As marrow fibrosis relateq to hyperparathyroidism has
`been implicated in causing resistance to erythropoietin,
`the patients were assessed both clinically and radiological(cid:173)
`ly for evidence of hyperparathyroidism. Radiologic evi(cid:173)
`dence of hyperparathyroid bone disease was found in
`47% of the patients studied, but there was no significant
`difference in prevalence of either bone disease or of alka(cid:173)
`line phosphatase levels between RG and NRG. Insuffi(cid:173)
`cient estimations of PTH levels were done to allow for
`statistical analysis (table 3).
`Only two patients in the study group received rhEPO.
`It was given at a constant dose for the duration of the
`study. The responses of these patients fell within the range
`of the study group as a whole.
`
`Adverse Reactions
`No anaphylactoid and no delayed reactions such as
`pyrexia, arthralgia, or myalgia were seen. Hypotensive
`episodes were more difficult to assess as these occur fre(cid:173)
`quently during the course of normal haemodialysis. At no
`stage did the clinicians responsible for the care of these
`patients feel that any of these episodes were related to the
`iron infusions, none of the infusions had to be stopped
`and no thrombophlebitis occurred. One patient died 19
`days after the infusion of complications unrelated to the
`infusion.
`
`Total Dose Iron Infusion in Haemodialysis
`Patients
`
`Ncphron 2002;92:316-323
`
`321
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 6
`
`

`
`07-07-14;09:02
`
`Pharmacosmos AS
`
`# 17/ 22
`
`Discussion
`
`In patients receiving rhEPO, iron deficiency is almost
`universal in those not receiving supplemental IV iron.
`With carefully supervised twice daily oral iron therapy
`sufficient iron may be absorbed to counter this tendency
`toward iron deficiency, but in practice, this is generally
`not achievable [7].
`Early studies were able to demonstrate the benefits of
`parenteral iron, given either as a total dose infusion or by
`intramuscular injection, despite the limitation imposed
`by the lack of adequate iron preparations as well as poor
`dialysis efficacy [8, 9]. Most of these studies were similar
`to our own in that patients were not receiving concomi(cid:173)
`tant EPO [10, 11]. Superiority of IV over oral iron was
`also demonstrated [ 12].
`More recently effective IV iron preparations and better
`tests for the evaluation of iron balance have become avail(cid:173)
`able, yet recent data from the USA indicate that many
`iron deficient haemodialysis patients are still receiving
`inadequate iron replacement [13].
`Our group of patients is unique as the vast majority
`were for financial reasons not being treated on rhEPO, yet
`77% were considered to be iron deficient by very conser(cid:173)
`vative criteria. Of the 62 patients studied, only 8 had fea(cid:173)
`tures suggesting iron overload and all had received multi(cid:173)
`ple blood transfusions.
`The response to TDI was dramatic in many patients,
`even in some without overt signs of iron deficiency and
`ferritin levels well within what could be considered the
`normal range. Ferritin levels also allowed us to monitor
`iron stores following a single TDI, and indicated how bio(cid:173)
`chemical signs of iron deficiency were starting to appear
`at the end of the 6-month follow-up period. At this time 7
`patients were sufficiently iron deficient to require more
`IV iron.
`Despite the fact that in all patients TDI had a uniform(cid:173)
`ly positive effect on all measures of iron status, including a
`rise in the MCV, a substantial proportion failed to
`respond with a rise in haemoglobin level. We were unable
`to determine the factors responsible for the differences in
`response in our patients. Aluminum overload is a well rec(cid:173)
`ognized cause of a non-responsive type of iron deficiency
`anaemia [ 4, 14]. Although we did not do formal studies of
`aluminum balance, overload is unlikely to have been
`responsible for the differences in response as the poorly
`responding group of patients had been on dialysis for a
`significantly shorter period which if anything, would sug(cid:173)
`gest less exposure to aluminum. Differences in parathy(cid:173)
`roid function could similarly not be demonstrated.
`
`'Functional iron deficiency' is a well recognized cause
`of erythropoietic unresponsiveness. It represents a situa(cid:173)
`tion oflow biologic iron availability despite the presence
`of adequate total body stores. In the presence of overt
`inflammatory or infective conditions, the diagnosis is
`obvious. However to exclude this condition in association
`with occult, low-grade and chronic conditions, tests such
`as CRP (as a marker of inflammation) or the % hypo(cid:173)
`chromic red cells or transferrin receptor levels (as mea(cid:173)
`sures of iron utilization) or a therapeutic challenge ofIV
`iron may be required [S, 6, 15]. The dose of iron used in
`our study given as a TDI, resulted in a mean rise in ferri(cid:173)
`tin levels well in excess of 1,000 ng/ml and transferrin sat(cid:173)
`uration levels in excess of 30%. Such levels should have
`substantially reduced the potential effect of 'functional
`deficiency' in the majority of non-responding patients.
`Another reason for the differences in response might
`have been differing levels of endogenous erythropoietin in
`the two groups. The rise in MCV without a corresponding
`rise in haemoglobin noted in the NRG is consistent with
`previous observations of iron loading in the presence of
`insufficient EPO [ 16]. EPO levels were not available to
`test this hypothesis. The clinical use of rhEPO in two of
`the patients did not influence results as their response was
`similar to the other patients.
`Anti-dextran antibodies are largely responsible for the
`high prevalence of side effects, including anaphylaxis, to
`dextran containing compounds [ 17]. With compounds
`such as iron sucrose and iron gluconate, side effects seem
`to be mostly related to the rate of iron release. It has there(cid:173)
`fore been suggested that for patients on haemodialysis,
`maximum single doses of these compounds should be lim(cid:173)
`ited to about 300 and 125 mg respectively [18, 19]. The
`iron polymaltose (dextrin) preparation (Ferrimed) used in
`this study releases iron more slowly and allows the use of
`TDI. In this respect it is similar to the dextran containing
`compounds which also have minimal free iron related
`side effects with high doses used with TDI [17]. No
`obvious side effects were noted when doses containing
`1-4 mg of iron were used during our study.
`There is little data regarding the optimal size of TDI
`doses, dosing schedules as well as tests to def me the need
`for further infusions [ 17]. It produces intermittent and
`marked fluctuations in total body iron stores as well as
`availability of iron to erythroid precursors. A fme balance
`needs to be maintained between body stores, best moni(cid:173)
`tored by ferritin levels and 'availability' of iron, probably
`best monitored on a routine monthly basis by the transfer(cid:173)
`rin saturation. Continuous techniques of iron administra(cid:173)
`tion would maintain more constant levels but require
`
`322
`
`Ncphron 2002;92:316-323
`
`van Zyl-Smit/Halkctt
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 7
`
`

`
`07-07-14;09:02
`
`Phar-macosmos AS
`
`# 18 / 22
`
`more frequent IV administration and monitoring in order
`to a void inadvertent iron over load [ 18].
`The main advantage of TDI over more frequent infu(cid:173)
`sions is likely to be its ease of administration in patients
`attending clinics at infrequent intervals such as those on
`CAPO or those with iron deficiency not on dialysis [20,
`21]. A further advantage may be the rapidity by which
`'non-responsiveness' to iron therapy may be detected. An
`immediate clinical re-assessment as to the cause of the
`
`anaemia can then be made as well and the need for further
`TOI.
`In conclusion, TOI with iron polymaltose (dextrin) is a
`safe and effective way of correcting iron deficiency.
`Where financial restrictions preclude the use of rhEPO,
`IV iron may still be a relatively inexpensive and effective
`way to substantially improve the haemoglobin level. It
`was not possible to determine which patients would be
`likely to respond best.
`
`References
`
`Esbach JW: The anaemia of chronic renal fail(cid:173)
`ure: Pathophysiology and the effects of =m(cid:173)
`binant erythropoictin. Kidney Int 1989;35:
`134-148.
`2 Akmal M, Sawelson S, Karubian F, Gadallah
`M: The prevalence and significance of occult
`blood loss in patients with prcdialysis ad(cid:173)
`vanced chronic renal failure, or receiving
`chronic dialytic therapy. Clin Ncphrol 1994;
`42:198-202.
`3 Lindsay RM, Burton JA, King P: The mcasuro(cid:173)
`mcnt of dialyser blood less. Cl in Ncphrol 1973;
`1:24-28.
`4 Bia MJ, Schnall S, Duffy T, Hendler E, Mal(cid:173)
`luchc H, Solomon L: Aluminium induced
`anaemia: Pathogenesis and treatment in pa(cid:173)
`tients on chronic hacmodialysis. Kidney Int
`1989;36:852-858.
`5 Besarab A, Amin N, Ahsan M, Vogel SE, Za.zu(cid:173)
`wa G, Frinak S, Zazra JJ, Anandan N, Gupta
`A: Optimization of cpoetin therapy with intra(cid:173)
`venous iron therapy in hemodialysis patients. J
`Am Soc Ncphro12000;11:530-538.
`6 Fishbanc S, Macsalca JK: lron management in
`end stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;
`29:319-333.
`7 Wingard RL, Parker RA, Ismail N, Hakim
`RM: Efficacy of oral iron therapy in patients
`receiving recombinant human crythropoietin.
`Am J Kidney Dis I 995;25(3):433-439.
`
`8 von Hartiti:sch B, Kerr DNS: Response to par(cid:173)
`enteral iron with and wiU1out androgen therapy
`in patients undergoing regular hacmodialysis.
`Nephron 1976;17:430-438.
`9 Stewart WK, Flemming LW, Shepherd AMM:
`Haemoglobin and scrum iron responses to peri(cid:173)
`odic intravenous iron-dcxtran infusions during
`maintenance haemodialysis. Nephron 1976;
`17:121-130.
`10 Silverberg OS, Blum M, Peer G, Kaplan E, Iai(cid:173)
`na A: Intravenous ferric saccharate as an iron
`supplement in dialysis patients. Ncphron 1996;
`72:413-417.
`11 Sehustack A, Mcshiaj D, Waiss Z, Gotloib L:
`Intramuscular iron replenishment and replace(cid:173)
`ment combined with testosterone encanthate
`in maintenance haemodialysis anemia: a fol(cid:173)
`low-up of up lo 8 years on 16 patients. Clin
`Ncphrol 1985;23:303-306.
`12 Fudin R, Jaichcnko J, Shostak A. Bennett M,
`GoUoib L: Correction of uraemic iron dclicicn(cid:173)
`cy anemia in hemodialyzcd patients: a prospec(cid:173)
`tive study. Ncphron 1998;79(3):299-305.
`13 Frankenfield D, Johnson CA, Wish JB, Rocco
`MV, Madore F, Owen WF: Anemia manage>
`ment of adult hemodialysis patienlS in the US:
`Results from the 1997 FSRD Core Indicators
`Project. Kidney Int 2000;S7:S78-S89.
`14 Caramelo CA, Cannata JB, Rodeles MR, Mar(cid:173)
`tin JLF, Mosquera JR, Monzu B, Outeirino J,
`Blum G, Andrea C, Lopes Farro AJ, Acuna G,
`Casado S, Hernando L: Mechanisms of alu·
`minium-induced microcytosis: Lessons from
`accidental aluminium intoxication. Kidney Int
`1995;47:64-168.
`
`IS Boyy C, Tsobo C, Crapcnzano L, Rorive G,
`Beguin Y, Albert A, Paulus JM: Factors deter(cid:173)
`mining the percentage of hypochromic red
`blood cells in hemodialysis patients. Kidney
`Int 1999;56:1113-1119.
`16 Glokal R, Wcatberall DJ, Bunch C: Iron in·
`duced increase in rod cell size in hacmodialysis
`paticnls. Quarterly J Med 1979;XLVI11:939-
`401.
`17 Auerbach M, Winchester J, Wahab A, Ri(cid:173)
`chards K, McGinlcy M, Hall F, Anderson J,
`Bricfcl G: A random izcd trial of three iron dex(cid:173)
`tran infusion methods for anemia in EPO(cid:173)
`treated dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis
`1998;32:81-86.
`18 Bailie GR, Johnson CA, Mason NA: Parenteral
`iron use in the management of anemia in cnd(cid:173)
`stagc renal disease patients. Am J Kidney Dis
`2000;3S(l):l-12.
`19 Nisscnson AR, Lindsay RM, Swan S, Seligman
`P, Strobos J: Sodium ferric gluconate complex
`in sucrose is safe and cfTcctive in hacmodialysis
`patients: North American clinical trial. Am J
`Kidney Dis 1999;33(3):471-482.
`20 Bcsarab A, Kaiser JW, Frinak S: A study of par(cid:173)
`enteral iron regimens in hcmodialysis patients.
`AmJ Kidney Dis 1999;34(1):21-28.
`21 Silverberg OS, Jaine A, Peer G, Kaplan E, Levi
`BA, Frank N, Stcinbruch S, Blum M: Intrave(cid:173)
`nous iron supplementation for the treatment of
`the anaemia of moderate to severe chronic
`renal failure patients not receiving dialysis. Am
`J Kidney Dis I 996;27:234-238.
`
`Total Dose Iron Infusion in Hacmodialysis
`Patients
`
`Ncphron 2002;92:316-323
`
`323
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1006, p. 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket