throbber
Immune Complex Anaphylaxis
`Induced by Dextran and Its Elimination
`by Hapten Inhibition
`
`A. W. Richter
`Department of Biomedical Research Pharmacia AB, 75182 Uppsala, Sweden and Department
`ofImmunology, University of Stockholm, 10401 Stockholm, Sweden
`
`Abstract
`
`Purpose: To elucidate the mechanism of the rare anaphylactic reactions elicited
`by i.v. infusion of Macrodex® and Rheomacrodex® and to find measures for
`their elimination.
`
`Methods: Hapten inhibition in vitro and in dextran anaphylaxis in guinea pigs
`and dogs.
`
`Human serology: Complement profiles; IgE assays: RAST, PCA in monkeys,
`RCLAAR *; estimation of dextran reactive antibodies (DRA) by gel diffusion,
`passive hemagglutination, RCLAAR for IgG and subclasses, 19A, IgM, IgD;
`ELISA for IgG. Histopathology of human lung specimens. Clinical trials in
`five countries to assess efficacy of hapten inhibition.
`
`Summary of results: Dextran anaphylaxis (incidence 0.05%) occurs upon the first
`infusion of a few ml of clinical dextran. Severity of anaphylaxis positively cor(cid:173)
`relates with IgG-DRA levels (especially IgG2) reaching conc of 1 mg/ml. High
`titers of specific IgA and IgM were also found but no IgE or IgD. C 1 q levels
`were low. Lung histopathology of fatal cases disclosed obstruction of vessels
`with globuli of fibrinlike material, aggregated platelets and leukocytes. The
`naturally occurring DRA which cause anaphylaxis originate from immuni(cid:173)
`zation with ingested wild type dextran or cross-reactive bacterial poly(cid:173)
`saccharides. Since dextran anaphylaxis in animals could be prevented or re(cid:173)
`duced by hapten inhibition, and a dextran fraction of Mw 1000 (Promit®)
`proved to be non-eliciting and safe, clinical trials were started. 130000 patients
`were treated with injection of 1.5 or 3 g of Promit® 2 min prior to clinical
`dextran infusion. The 3 g dose reduced the incidence of anaphylaxis about 20
`times. This was confirmed by a two years post-marketing surveillance period in
`Sweden.
`
`* Red cell linked antigen antibody reaction.
`
`J. Ring et al. (eds.), New Trends in Allergy II
`© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 1
`
`

`

`Immune Complex Anaphylaxis Induced by Dextran
`
`273
`
`Conclusions: Dextran anaphylaxis is an immediate type, IgG-mediated reaction
`comparable to anaphylaxis in patients with deficiency of IgA or factor VIII.
`Hapten inhibition could be successfully applied to eliminate life-threatening
`dextran reactions by injecting monovalent hapten-dextran (Promit®) prior to
`infusion of Macrodex® IRheomacrodes®.
`
`Introduction
`
`In recent years the worldwide use of pharmaceuticals with established medical
`value has imposed increased demands on their safety. Among plasma sub(cid:173)
`stitutes the efficacy of dextran is well documented. Its additional blood flow
`improving and thromboprophylactic effects are widely used. Although severe
`adverse reactions to clinical dextran preparations are rare [1], they occur with
`an estimated incidence of 1 :2000 patients [2]. The elimination of such reactions
`was therefore made the aim of studies begun in Uppsala in 1968. Since then,
`many workers have joined the research program and formed collaborating
`study groups in Munich, Uppsala, and Vienna. Many publications have reflect(cid:173)
`ed the progress of the project [3-24; for reviews see 14,21,22,24,43]. The
`stepwise elucidation of the mechanism of dextran anaphylaxis in man, the
`study of animal models of dextran anaphylaxis, and its successful prevention by
`hapten inhibition, as well as the production of monovalent hapten-dextran on a
`large scale [18] enabled us to begin clinical trials of hapten prophylaxis in hu(cid:173)
`mans in 1978. The trials grew into large multicenter multinational studies,
`which ended in 1982 and were published in a series of articles [24, 33 - 40]. Re(cid:173)
`sults show that the incidence of severe dextran-induced anaphylactic reactions
`(DIARs) is greatly reduced by preinjection of hapten-dextran in a dose-de(cid:173)
`pendent manner, conferring greater safety to dextran infusion therapy. In this
`chapter I shall outline the course of the research program and the present data
`from the combined clinical trials and subsequent postmarketing surveillance in
`Sweden (1983 -1984). The role of IgG-mediated anaphylactic reactions, as op(cid:173)
`posed to IgE-mediated ones, will also be discussed.
`
`Historical Background
`
`Dextran of Mw 70000 was introduced into medicine as plasma substitute in 1947
`by Ingelman and Gronwall [6]. It was prepared from a branched type of native
`dextran and quite frequently caused mild allergic reactions. Change to a more
`linear dextran reduced the incidence of allergic reactions [25]. This dextran pro(cid:173)
`duced by the Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B 512 strain is still used today.
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 2
`
`

`

`274
`
`A. W. Richter
`
`Gelin and co-workers showed that dextran of Mw 40000 increased the suspen(cid:173)
`sion stability of blood and improved blood flow in the microcirculation [26].
`This led to the introduction of Rheomacrodex as a blood flow-improving agent
`[27]. In the 1960s an additional effect of dextran 70 was found, i.e., that it
`reduced the incidence of postoperative pulmonary embolism [28]. This
`thromboprophylactic effect is now the most frequent medical indication for
`dextran 70. The increased worldwide use of clinical dextran led to a consider(cid:173)
`able number of reported adverse reactions in spite of the low incidence of such
`reactions.
`
`Immunology of Dextran
`
`The immunogenicity of B 512 dextran in man is molecular weight dependent
`[29]. Whereas native and very high molecular weight dextrans are immunogenic
`in humans, dextran 70 and 40 are nonimmunogenic [21]. From the immunologi(cid:173)
`cal point of view, a dextran infusion with 30-100 g represents an "overwhelm(cid:173)
`ing" dose. In animals corresponding doses lead to immunological unresponsive(cid:173)
`ness. Like other polysaccharides, dextran induces a thymus-independent IgM
`response in mice [21]. However, dextran can be converted to a thymus-de(cid:173)
`pendent antigen by covalent coupling to protein [5]. Such conjugates elicit a
`strong IgG antidextran response upon immunization of carp, mice, guinea pigs,
`rabbits, sheep, and horses. We have utilized this fact to raise antidextrans in
`rabbits and dogs for use in our anaphylaxis models and for analytical purposes
`[5, 8]. Most people have natural dextran-reactive antibodies (DRAs) in their
`sera. They may have been induced by native, high molecular weight dextran in(cid:173)
`gested as food contaminant, produced by bacteria of the gastrointestinal tract,
`or produced by other cross-reactive microbial polysaccharides [30; for review
`see 21].
`
`Table 1. Scale of severity of clinical symptoms of adverse reactions to colloidal infusion solu(cid:173)
`tions (Rind and MeBmer (14], Laubenthal [36])
`
`Grade of
`severity
`
`Clinical symptoms
`
`II
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`Skin manifestations: flush, erythema, urticaria
`
`Measurable, but not life-threatening hemodynamic reaction (blood pressure fall,
`20-60 mmHg). Dyspnea, nausea, vomiting
`
`Shock (blood pressure fall exceeding 60 mmHg). Life-threatening
`bronchospasm
`
`Cardiac and/or respiratory arrest
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 3
`
`

`

`Immune Complex Anaphylaxis Induced by Dextran
`
`275
`
`Serology in Humans
`
`Antibodies
`
`Analysis of sera of dextran reactors and nonreactors, accumulated over many
`years, with various standardized procedures for measuring DRAs, gave the fol(cid:173)
`lowing results. Circulating DRAs occur in low titers in the majority of human
`populations; high titers are only found in a small percentage of individuals.
`Geographical variations in titer distribution do occur [23]. All patients with se(cid:173)
`vere DIAR of grades III and IV (see Table 1 for classification) have high or
`very high titers of circulating DRA before the reaction. No IgE class DRAs
`could be found in 100 dextran reactors with different methods [7]. When Ig
`classes and subgroups were studied by RCLAAR and ELISA in reactors and
`nonreactors to dextran, high titers of IgG, especially of IgG 2, usually ac(cid:173)
`companied by IgA and IgM, were found in reactors, whereas nonreactors had
`small amounts of mostly IgM class DRAs [11, 19]. An excellent correlation was
`found between the grade of severity of DIAR and the titer of IgG class DRAs,
`implying that large amounts of immune complexes are formed in the circu(cid:173)
`lation of patients with the most severe reactions [19].
`
`Complement
`
`Complement profiles were established in dextran reactors [7]. The most impor(cid:173)
`tant finding was a significant decrease in the levels of CIq in severe DIAR. Con(cid:173)
`centrations of the other complement proteins and of the anaphylatoxin inac(cid:173)
`tivator were normal. These results show that the classical pathway is activated
`in dextran reactors by immune complexes. The findings are in accord with the
`occurrence of high titers ofIgG class DRAs in patients with severe DIAR.
`
`Studies of the Chemical and Pharmaceutical
`Manufacturing Procedure
`
`the action of Leuconostoc
`is a polysaccharide produced by
`Dextran
`mesenteroides NRRL B 512 on sucrose in the presence of nutrients. Thus, a
`careful purification process is necessary to manufacture clinical dextran prep(cid:173)
`arations of defined molecular weight and molecular weight distribution. Since
`macromolecular contaminants may sensitize patients, we tested the immuno(cid:173)
`genicity of dextran from the early stages of the manufacturing process. No evi(cid:173)
`dence for immunogenic impurities could be demonstrated [5]. Later, it was
`found that a soluble macromolecular component of Leuconostoc bacteria react(cid:173)
`ed with anti-yeast mannan antibodies. As such a Leuconostoc-derived com(cid:173)
`ponent could be a potentially sensitizing agent in clinical dextran, an im-
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 4
`
`

`

`276
`
`A. W. Richter
`
`munochemical test for its detection and quantitation was developed [31]. By im(cid:173)
`proved purification, its concentration in clinical dextran was reduced to 10 ppm
`or less. Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions to clinical dextran be(cid:173)
`fore and after introduction of the Leuconostoc RSRI purity test provided no
`evidence for a causal role of this contaminant in eliciting DIAR, but suggested
`an elicitor role of the dextran molecule itself.
`
`Hapten Inhibition In Vitro
`
`Haptens cannot induce antibody formation but do bind to antibodies of cor(cid:173)
`responding specificity. They may be poly-lor monovalent with regard to the
`number of antigenic determinants. Whereas a polyvalent hapten forms immune
`complexes with antibodies, a monovalent hapten binds to individual combining
`sites of antibodies only, and cannot join together antibodies by bridging. In the
`B 512 dextran-anti dextran system, monovalent isomalto-oligosaccharides (lOS)
`inhibit the precipitation of antidextran by large dextran molecules [32]. Their
`inhibitory power increases strongly from isomaltose to isomaltopentaose with
`little further increase for isomalto-hexaose and isomalto-heptaose. These results
`were confirmed by indirect single radial immunodiffusion [5]. A dextran frag(cid:173)
`ment of 6 glucose units (Mw 990) was judged suitable as a monovalent hapten
`for in vivo experiments. Thus, dextran 1 with Mw 1000 was prepared on a large
`scale by prolonged acid hydrolysis of B 512 dextran with subsequent fractiona(cid:173)
`tion and purification [18]. It is a mixture of lOS with 2-13 glucose units. Its
`molecular size distribution is controlled by gel chromatography. Dextran 1 IS
`used clinically as a sterile 15% solution delivered in 20-ml vials.
`
`Animal Experiments on Anaphylactic Shock
`
`Hapten Inhibition of Cytotropic Passive Dextran Anaphylaxis
`in Guinea Pigs
`
`The most important findings show that 100% protection from anaphylactic
`death can be achieved by admixture of low molecular hapten-dextran to the
`challenging high molecular dextran or by injection of hapten-dextran prior to
`challenge [3]. The protective effect is dose dependent and a significant re(cid:173)
`duction in mortality is observed when the hapten is present in a molar excess of
`3 - 7, corresponding to an admixture of 10% - 50% w Iw to the challenging
`dextran [3, 4]. For the hapten, a Mw range of 1000 was found to be optimal in
`terms of both protective effect and safety requirements [5]. No elicitor action is
`present upon challenge with such a hapten, even at maximal degrees of sensiti-
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 5
`
`

`

`Immune Complex Anaphylaxis Induced by Dextran
`
`277
`
`zation. Since the basic bridging (elicitor) mechanism in anaphylaxis appears to
`be shared by all mammals, these considerations should also apply to humans,
`both for IgE- and IgG-mediated reactions.
`
`Hapten Inhibition of Active Dextran Anaphylaxis, i.e.,
`Immune Complex (Aggregate, IgG-Mediated) Anaphylaxis in Dogs
`
`Most important is the fact that in this active anaphylaxis model circulating
`DRAs are induced (by immunization with edestin-dextran) in a titer pattern
`roughly comparable to that of humans [8]. In both conscious [9, 15] and anes(cid:173)
`thetized dogs [13], DIARs of varying degree of severity could be elicited and
`followed by measurements of hemodynamics, blood cell numbers, and DRA
`titers. Hapten-dextran of Mw 1000 given either before or admixed to the chal(cid:173)
`lenging dextran 60 significantly reduced both the number and the severity of
`DIAR [13].
`
`Comparison of Cytotropic and Aggregate or Immune
`Complex Anaphylaxis in Monkeys
`
`Different cardiorespiratory patterns of shock were observed in aggregate ana(cid:173)
`phylaxis (AA) and cytotropic anaphylaxis (CA), reflecting different biological
`actions of IgE and IgG class antibodies. A decrease in cardiac output and con(cid:173)
`comitant hypotension was seen in AA and CA. During AA, intense pulmonary
`vasoconstriction was initially important in depressing cardiac output; periph(cid:173)
`eral blood pooling was the main mechanism in CA. The respiratory reaction
`limited gas transport over the lungs greatly in CA but not in AA. Decreased
`pulmonary compliance in AA was due to pulmonary congestion, whereas in CA
`it was due to constriction of bronchial smooth muscle. The differences between
`AA and CA might be explained by the fact that platelets were activated only in
`AA. Apparently, vasoconstricting mediators predominate in AA and vasodilat(cid:173)
`ing ones in CA [12, 16].
`
`Multicenter Clinical Trials of Hapten Prophylaxis
`in Five Countries
`
`Prospective open clinical trials began in 1978 and ended in 1982. Physicians at
`80 clinics in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Germany, and Switzerland participat(cid:173)
`ed. It was apparent that a large number of patients would be required to assess
`a reduction in the incidence of severe DIAR. From a large amount of historical
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 6
`
`

`

`278
`
`A. W. Richter
`
`control material comprising reports on DIAR in Sweden [2], the incidence of
`severe DIAR (grades III and IV) was estimated to 0.05%, i.e., I: 2000 pa(cid:173)
`tients. This represents a minimum figure, and thus the number of severe DIARs
`expected to occur in 100000 patients infused with dextran 70 and hapten could
`be about 50. Therefore, the inclusion of a large control group was considered
`unethical. Results of clinical trials in Germany [24, 33, 36], Switzerland [34, 35],
`and Scandinavia [37 -40] have been reported elsewhere. For combined clinical
`trials, see Table 2. Among 37626 patients receiving dextran 70 after injection of
`10 ml hapten-dextran, 0.029% (i.e., 29 per 100000) reacted with severe DIAR.
`This was not satisfactory, and in further trials the hapten dose was doubled to
`20 ml, since hapten inhibition in animal models is a dose- dependent phenom(cid:173)
`enon. And indeed, among 79951 patients receiving dextran 70 after injection of
`20 ml hapten-dextran, only 0.00375% reacted with severe DIAR (grade III on(cid:173)
`ly). This would correspond to 3.75 per 100000. The protective effect of the
`20 ml dose is 7.8 times better than that of the 10 ml dose. With regard to the
`"historical" control figure for severe DIAR (0.05% per patient), the 10 ml dose
`decreased the incidence by 42% and the 20 ml dose by 93%. Instead of an inci(cid:173)
`dence of severe DIAR of 1 : 2000 patients before use of hapten-dextran, we now
`have an incidence of 1 : 27000 according to results of 80000 protocolled pa(cid:173)
`tients receiving preinjection of 20 ml dextran 1.
`
`Table 2. Prophylaxis against DIARs by administration of dextran 70 after injection of either
`10 ml or 20 ml hapten-dextran
`
`Country
`
`Patients
`
`DIARs
`
`No. ofDIARs, grade of severity
`
`(n)
`
`(total no.)
`
`II
`
`III
`
`IV V*
`
`10-m1 studies
`Germany
`Switzerland
`Scandinavia
`
`20 ml studies
`Germany
`Switzerland
`Scandinavia
`
`6 I13
`2280
`29233
`
`37626
`
`24513
`14339
`41099
`
`79951
`
`I3
`3
`61
`
`77
`
`24
`14
`72
`
`110
`
`* grade V = lethal outcome
`
`8
`I
`41
`
`50
`
`16
`9
`56
`
`81
`
`3
`0
`I3
`
`16
`
`6
`5
`15
`
`26
`
`0
`0
`I
`
`2
`2
`6
`
`10
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`'--0.0292%--' I of 3421
`patients
`
`2
`0
`I
`
`3
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`0.0038%--' I of27000
`patients
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 7
`
`

`

`Immune Complex Anaphylaxis Induced by Dextran
`
`279
`
`Postmarketing Surveillance of Hapten Prophylaxis in Sweden,
`1983-1984
`
`The Scandinavian multicenter clinical trials of hapten prophylaxis of DIAR
`ended in September 1981. They showed a 14-fold reduction in the incidence of
`severe DIAR. In November 1982 hapten-dextran was registered as a drug in
`Sweden under the name of Promiten (dextran 1, Pharmacia AB, Uppsala,
`Sweden) for the prophylaxis of severe DIAR. A preliminary survey based on
`spontaneous reports of DIAR to the health authorities and the producer has
`been compiled [41] and is presented here (Table 3). As in the clinical trials,
`each case report has been evaluated regarding causality and severity. The no(cid:173)
`menclature used by the health authorities was adapted for causality classifi(cid:173)
`cation: P = dextran is the probable or possible cause, N = the elicitation of the
`reaction by dextran is not probable or not assessable. In many instances, classi(cid:173)
`fication was facilitated by access to serum samples taken before the reaction
`and estimation of DRAs by passive hemagglutination or ELISA. The use of
`clinical dextran in Sweden has increased: during 1983 - 84, 424858 units were
`sold, as well as 205408 units of Promiten. This suggests that the prophylaxis
`concept has been accepted by the great majority of physicians, since for each
`dextran 1 unit, about 2.1 units of clinical dextran have been used. Therefore
`prerequisites are fulfilled for a valid estimation of the efficacy of Promiten
`prophylaxis during this time period, especially since the reporting of severe and
`lethal drug reactions is mandatory in Sweden (see Table 3). Compared to the
`control period of 1975 -79, when clinical dextran was used without hapten [2],
`the incidence of severe DIAR (grades III, IV, and V) was reduced at least 16
`times. One fatal reaction occurred in a patient with sepsis accompanied by an
`
`Table 3. Findings regarding postmarketing surveillance of hapten prophylaxis in Sweden,
`1983-1984 [41]
`
`Period
`
`1975-1979
`(no hapten)
`Incidence (%):
`
`1983-1984
`(with hapten)
`Incidence (%):
`
`No. of dextran DIARs
`(total no.)
`bott! es used
`
`DIARs, grade of severity
`
`II
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`V
`
`647756
`
`300
`
`61
`
`94
`
`424858
`
`53
`
`34
`
`13
`
`78
`44
`~0.0224
`~0.0103--'
`
`23
`
`0
`5
`I
`~ 0.0014 -----'
`~0.0002--'
`
`Decrease of incidence in %:
`Reduction of incidence:
`
`74
`
`15
`
`79
`
`90
`
`100
`
`94
`~15 times-'
`45 times
`~16 times
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 8
`
`

`

`280
`
`A. W. Richter
`
`Table 4. Mitigated severe DIAR reflecting a beneficial hapten effect (suspected DIAR in post-
`marketing study 1983-1984)
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`68
`
`7b
`
`8
`
`P,
`Code Sev-
`erity NP
`
`DRA titer IgGDRA
`pass hem
`assay
`titer
`
`ELISA
`(OD,
`4lOnm)
`
`Prec. DRA Classification
`(mg/ml)
`(clin. and immun. data)
`
`E
`G
`H
`K
`M
`0
`P
`Q
`R
`
`I
`I
`V
`II
`I
`III
`II
`V
`III
`
`P
`P
`NP
`P
`P
`P
`P
`P
`P
`
`512
`512
`128
`512
`128
`2048
`512
`2048
`1024
`
`800
`50000
`1000
`400000
`400
`200000
`1600
`1600000
`400000
`
`0.163
`>2.000
`0.134
`>2.000 0.5
`0.047
`>2.000 0.7
`0.175
`>2.000 2.4
`l.l
`>2.000
`
`8 Column 6: All sera screened at a dilution 1:400
`b Column 7: Estimation of precipitating DRA by RSRI
`
`True grade I DIAR
`Mitigated severe DIAR
`Not antibody mediated
`Mitigated severe DIAR
`True grade I DIAR
`Mitigated severe DIAR
`True grade II DIAR
`True grade V DIAR
`Mitigated severe DIAR
`
`extremely high titer of ORA of IgG class (2.4 mg IgG/ml serum) (see Table 4).
`In this patient the hapten dose was not sufficient or was not distributed evenly
`in the circulation due to circulatory insufficiency.
`The incidence of severe DIAR in the surveillance period is 1 : 33000 pa(cid:173)
`tients, a figure well in accord with that of the combined 20 ml clinical trials of
`dextran 1. The effect of hapten is also exemplified in Table 4, showing cases
`from the surveillance study with mild DIAR exhibiting extremely high titers of
`IgG class DRAs. These cases have been classified by clinical and immunologi(cid:173)
`cal data as "mitigated severe DIAR," contrasting to "true" mild reactions ac(cid:173)
`companied by low titers ofIgG class DRAs.
`
`Conclusions
`
`Dextran-induced anaphylactic reactions in humans are classified as IgG-me(cid:173)
`diated immune complex anaphylaxis. This is evident from the presence of mg/
`ml concentrations of specific antibody, complement activation via the classical
`pathway, and pathological changes in lungs conforming to the picture of im(cid:173)
`mune complex (lgG) but not cytotropic (lgE) anaphylaxis in monkeys. Severe
`DIARs occur upon the first infusion of a few milliliters of clinical dextran.
`Dextran reactors have thus not been sensitized by clinical dextran but they are
`high responders to dextran and have high titers of preformed naturally occur(cid:173)
`ring ORA in their sera. Though IgE anaphylaxis appears to dominate in hu(cid:173)
`mans, DIARs are not the only example of IgG-mediated anaphylactic reactions.
`Another well documented example is anaphylaxis in IgA-deficient patients
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 9
`
`

`

`Immune Complex Anaphylaxis Induced by Dextran
`
`281
`
`upon repeated infusion of IgA-containing blood or plasma [42]. The regular oc(cid:173)
`scale pro(cid:173)
`currence of DRA in severe DIAR and the possibility of large -
`duction of a monovalent hapten [18] led to the successful application of hapten
`inhibition in preventing dextran anaphylaxis. In the era before hapten prophy(cid:173)
`laxis, the estimated incidence of severe DIAR was I : 2000 patients [2]. In clini(cid:173)
`cal trials with 10 and 20 ml Promiten the incidence was I : 3400 and 1 : 27 000
`respectively. In the postmarketing surveillance of about 200000 patients the
`incidence was I: 33000 patients. The incidence of lethal DIAR was I: 15000
`patients without hapten and I : 200000 with 20 ml hapten-dextran.
`It should be pointed out that an estimated number of 2000000 patients have
`hitherto received hapten-dextran worldwide. The risk of giving dextran should
`be compared with its beneficial effect when used as a thromboprophylactic
`agent [28]. In Sweden an estimated number of at least 200 patients were protect(cid:173)
`ed from fatal lung embolism in a 2-year period, compared with one fatal ana(cid:173)
`phylactic dextran reaction [41].
`
`Participants in the Research Program
`
`Sweden: Richter W, Hedin H, Granath K, Ingelman B, Perlman P, Stalenheim
`G, Smedegard G, Ljungstrom KG, Renck H, Revenas B, Saldeen T
`Germany: Messmer K, Ring J, Seemann-Mendler C, Laubenthal H, Peter K,
`Selbmann HK, Schwartz JA, Gregori M
`Austria: Kraft D, Rumpold H, Scheiner 0, Steinbereithner K
`Great Britain: Devey M, Stanworth D
`USA: Muller-Eberhard HJ et al.
`Switzerland: Gruber U, Allemann U, Gerber H, Wettier H
`Japan: Takamoto H
`
`Acknowledgments. Thanks are due to our laboratory technicians and to the staff and personnel
`of the 80 hospitals which made possible the successful performance of the clinical trials.
`
`References
`
`I. Furhoff AK (1977) Anaphylactoid reactions to dextran - a report of 133 cases. Acta
`Anaesth Scand 21:161-167
`2. Ljungstrom KG, Renck H, Strandberg K, Hedin H, Richter W, WiderlofE (1983) Adverse
`reactions to dextran in Sweden 1970-1979. Acta Chir Scand 149:253-262
`3. Richter W (1971) Hapten inhibition of passive antidextran dextran anaphylaxis in guinea
`pigs. Int Arch Allergy 41 :826 - 844
`4. Richter W (1973) Built-in hapten inhibition of anaphylaxis by the low molecular weight
`subfractions of a B 512 dextran fraction of l\\, 3400. Int Arch Allergy 45:930- 936
`5. Richter W (1973) Immunological in vivo and in vitro studies of the dextran antidextran
`system. Thesis, University of Uppsala
`6. Ingelman B (1947) Dextran and its use as a plasma substitute. Acta Chern Scand
`1:731-738
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 10
`
`

`

`282
`
`A. W. Richter
`
`7. Hedin H (1977) Dextran-induced anaphylactoid reactions in man. Immunological in vitro
`and in vivo studies. Thesis, University of Uppsala
`8. Seeman C, Hedin H, Richter W, Ring J, Stippig S, Messmer K (1978) Haptenhemmung
`der Dextran-induzierten anaphylaktischen Reaktion beim Hund. Allergologie 1:185
`9. Schwarz JA, Raschack M (1978) Verhinderung Antikorperbedingter Dextran-Nebenwir(cid:173)
`kungen durch Hapten-Hemmung - eine experimentelle Pilotstudie am wachen Hund.
`Allergologie I: 184
`10. Hedin H, Smedegard G (1979) Complement profiles in monkeys subjected to aggregate
`(immune complex) anaphylaxis and following injection of soluble and particulate poly(cid:173)
`saccharides. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 60:286- 294
`11. Hedin H, Kraft D, Richter W, Scheiner 0, Devey M (1979) Dextran-reactive antibodies in
`patients with anaphylactoid reactions to dextran. Immunobiology 156:289 - 290
`12. Smedegard G (1980) Anaphylactic shock. Pathophysiology of aggregate and cytotropic
`anaphylaxis in the monkey. Thesis, Acta Univers Upsala, p 548
`13. Mendler C (1980) Hapten-Hemmung der Dextran-induzierten anaphylaktischen Reaktion
`beim Hund. Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
`14. Ring J (1976) Anaphylaktoide Reaktionen nach Infusion naturlicher und kunstlicher Kol(cid:173)
`loide. Thesis for habilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich
`15. Schwarz JA, Rother U, Koch W, Raschack M, Till G (1981) Verhinderung Antikorper-be(cid:173)
`dingter Dextran-Nebenwirkungen durch Haptenhemmung mit Dextran 1 am Hund.
`Anaesthesist 30:297 - 303
`16. Revenas B, Smedegard G, Saldeen T, Fredholm BB, Strandberg K (1981) Anaphylactic
`shock in monkeys passively sensitized with human reaginic serum. II. Respiratory mechan(cid:173)
`ics, hematology and metabolism. Acta Physiol Scand 111:249-257
`17. Schwarz JA, Koch W, Buhler V, Kaumeier S (1981) Pharmacokinetics of low molecular
`(monovalent) dextran (Dx 1) in volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 19:358 - 367
`18. Richter A W, Ingelman B, Granath K (1982) An isomalto-oligosaccharide product for
`medical use. Abstract, poster presentation, 11th international carbohyd symposium, Van(cid:173)
`couver, BC
`19. Kraft D, Hedin H, Richter W, Scheiner 0, Rumpold H, Devey ME (1982) Im(cid:173)
`munoglobulin class and subclass distribution of dextran reactive antibodies in human re(cid:173)
`actors and nonreactors to clinical dextran. Allergy 37:481-489
`20. Hedin H, Richter W (1982) Pathomechanism of dextran-induced anyphylactoid/anaphy(cid:173)
`lactic reactions in man. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 68: 122-126
`21. Richter A W, Hedin HI (1982) Dextran hypersensitivity (a review). Immunol Today
`3:132-138
`22. Richter W, Hedin H (1983) Solutions and emulsions used for intravenous infusions. In: de
`Weck AL, Bundgaard H (eds) Allergic reaction to drugs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New
`York Tokyo (Handbook of experimental pharmacology, vol 63)
`23. Messmer K, Richter W, Takaori M (1984) Prinzip der Haptenhemmung zur Prophylaxe
`der Dextrananaphylaxie: immunologische Aspekte. Beitr Anaesth Intensivmed 3: 15 - 27
`24. Laubenthal H, Peter K, Richter W, Kraft D, Selbmann HK, Messmer K (1983) Ana(cid:173)
`phylaktoide/anaphylaktische Reaktionen auf Dextran. Pathomechanismus und Prophy(cid:173)
`laxe. Diagnostik Intensivtherapie 8:4-14
`25. Kabat EA, Turino GM, Tarrow AB, Maurer PH (1957) Studies on the immunochemical
`basis of allergic reactions to dextran in man. J Clin Invest 36: 1160 - 1170
`26. Gelin LE (1956) Studies in anemia of injury. Thesis, University of Gothenburg. Acta Chir
`Scand Suppl 210
`27. Gelin LE, Ingelman B (1961) Rheomacrodex - a new dextran solution for rheological
`treatment of impaired capillary flow. Acta Chir Scand 122:294- 302
`28. Bergentz SE (1978) Dextran in the prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism. World J Surg
`2:19-25
`29. Kabat EA, Bezer AE (1958) The effect of variation in molecular weight on the antigenicity
`of dextran in man. Arch Biochem Biophys 78:306 - 318
`30. Hehre EJ, Neill JM (1946) Formation of serologically reactive dextrans by streptococci
`from subacute bacterial endocarditis. J Exp Med 83:147-163
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 11
`
`

`

`Immune Complex Anaphylaxis Induced by Dextran
`
`283
`
`31. Richter AW (1980) A new immunochemical purity test for clinical dextran. Methodology
`and studies on clinical dextran preparations. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 61 :457 - 466
`32. Kabat EA (1961) Inhibition reactions. In: Kabat EA, Mayer MM (eds) Experimental im(cid:173)
`munochemistry, 2nd edn. Thomas, Springfield
`33. Messmer K, Ljungstrom KG, Gruber UF, Richter W, Hedin H (1980) Prevention of
`dextran-induced anaphylactoid reactions by hapten inhibition. Lancet 1:975
`34. Gruber UF, Allemann U, Gerber H, Wetder H (1982) Erster direkter Vergleich der aller(cid:173)
`gischen Nebenwirkungen des Dextrans mit und ohne Hapten. Schweiz Med Wochenschr
`112:605-612
`35. Gruber UF, Wetder H, Allemann U, Gerber H, Laubenthal H, Messmer K (1982) Pro(cid:173)
`phylaxe allergischer Dextran-Reaktionen durch Vorinjektion von 20 ml Hapten bei 12000
`Patienten in der Schweiz. Schweiz Rundschau Med (Praxis) 71:1092-1100
`36. Laubenthal H (1983) Dextrananaphylaxie. Pathomechanismus und Prophylaxe durch
`Haptenhemmung. Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen, klinischen Studie. Thesis for habili(cid:173)
`tation, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich
`37. Ljungstrom KG, Renck H, Hedin H, Richter W, Rosberg B (1983) Prevention of dextran(cid:173)
`induced anaphylactic reactions by hapten inhibition. I. A Scandinavian multicenter study
`on the effects of 10 ml dextran, 15%, administered before dextran 70 or dextran 40. Acta
`Chir Scand 149:341 - 348
`38. Renck H, Ljungstrom KG, Rosberg B, Dhuner KG, Dahl S (1983) Prevention of dextran(cid:173)
`induced anaphylactic reactions by hapten inhibition. II. A comparison of the effects of
`20 ml Dextran 1, 15%, administered either admixed to or before dextran 70 or dextran 40.
`Acta Chir Scand 149:349- 353
`39. Renck H, Ljungstrom KG, Hedin H, Richter W (1983) Prevention of dextran-induced
`anaphylactic reactions by hapten inhibition. III. A Scandinavian multicenter study on the
`effects of 20 ml Dextran 1, 15%, administered before dextran 70 or dextran 40. Acta Chir
`Scand 149:355 - 360
`40. Ljungstrom KG, Renck H (1983) Sakrare dextranterapi med hapteninhibition. Stor skan(cid:173)
`dinavisk studie. Liikartidningen 80 (1- 2):26 - 27
`41. Ljungstrom KG, Renck H, Hedin H, Richter W, Wiholm BE (1985) Hapteninhibition
`minskade biverkningama vid dextran-anvandning. Liikartidningen 82:2772 - 2773
`42. Leikola J, Koistinen J, Lethinen M, Virolainen M (1973) IgA-induced anaphylactic trans(cid:173)
`fusion reactions: a report of four cases. Blood 42: 111 - 119
`43. Ring J (1982) Zur Problematik der Dextran-Unvertraglichkeit und ihrer spezifischen Pro(cid:173)
`phylaxe durch Haptenhemmung. Fortschr Med 100: 1917-1921
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1036, p. 12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket