throbber
FDA Advisory Committee Briefing Document
`
`Drug Safety and Risk Management Committee
`February 1, 2008
`
`Prepared by the Division of Medical Imaging and Hematology Products/Office of
`Oncology Drug Products/Office of New Drugs
`Consultative assistance from the Office of Clinical Pharmacology and the Office of
`Biostatistics
`
`New Drug Application (NDA) 22-054 for Injectafer (Ferric Carboxymaltose) for the
`treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with heavy uterine bleeding or
`postpartum patients
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Topics for discussion
`Executive summary
`Background
` Medical summary
` Clinical pharmacology summary
` Biometrics review
`Publication: Amanzadeh, J, Reilly, R. Hypophosphatemia: an
`evidence-based approach to its clinical consequences and management.
`Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology 2: 136-147; 2006.
`
`Page
`2
`3
`
`7
`50
`54
`
`64
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 1
`
`

`

`Topics for Questions for Advisory Committee Members:
`
`1. The committee will be asked to discuss the importance of the mortality data in the
`Injectafer clinical development program.
`
`2. Based upon considerations of the overall risks and benefits of Injectafer, FDA plans to
`request advice regarding marketing approval of the drug for the proposed indication.
`
`3. FDA anticipates the marketing approval discussion to involve considerations of:
`the need for additional clinical studies (either prior to approval or as a post-
`(cid:120)
`marketing commitment),
`a risk management plan,
`(cid:120)
`(cid:120) modification of the proposed indication or dosage regimen to enhance safety.
`
`2
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 2
`
`

`

`Executive Summary
`
`1. Product Background:
`Injectafer (Ferric Carboxymaltose, from Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is the subject of
`a New Drug Application (NDA) for the indication of, "treatment of iron deficiency
`anemia in: heavy uterine bleeding (or) postpartum patients."
`
`The proposed market population includes patients who might otherwise receive oral iron
`as a treatment option. Consequently, the bulk of the clinical data assessing Injectafer
`safety and efficacy were obtained from studies that compared Injectafer to oral iron.
`Injectafer is not specifically proposed for use as an alternative to other parenteral iron
`products or for patients who are intolerant of oral iron.
`
`The Injectafer dosage regimen allows potentially a full iron replenishment dosage with
`three or fewer intravenous administrations, contingent upon the body's estimated iron
`deficit and certain limits upon a single dosage. Specifically, the dose is determined by
`calculating the total iron requirement and dividing this total amount into one or more
`single dose(s). The proposed dose regimen allows for the rapid intravenous (IV) push
`injection (single dose (cid:148) 500 mg) or IV infusion of up to a maximum dose of 1,000 mg (or
`15 mg/kg) for the first dose. The maximum single doses may be administered every
`seven days until the total iron requirement has been administered or a maximum of 2,500
`mg has been administered. Consequently, a "cycle" may be viewed as consisting of the
`weekly dosage regimens that delivered the full iron replacement dose or a maximum of
`2,500 mg iron.
`
`2. Clinical and Drug Class Background
`Iron deficiency anemia, one of the most common forms of anemia, is generally due to the
`loss of body iron during hemorrhage or insufficient iron intake. In addition to treatment
`of the underlying cause of iron deficiency anemia (such as correction of bleeding), iron
`replenishment helps normalize blood hemoglobin levels and potentially lessen the
`duration or severity of anemia symptoms.
`
`Many clinical situations are associated with the development of iron deficiency anemia,
`such as chronic hemodialysis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to various lesions,
`pregnancy and the postpartum condition, inflammatory bowel disease as well as
`hemorrhage due to uterine bleeding. The pathophysiology of the anemia in many of
`these considerations involves the interaction of multiple factors, such as hemorrhage,
`nutrition and malabsorption. The Injectafer clinical development program examined the
`use of the product in patients with iron deficiency anemia associated with chronic kidney
`disease (including patients undergoing hemodialysis), inflammatory bowel disease, heavy
`uterine bleeding as well as post-partum iron deficiency.
`
`Iron replenishment may be necessary only for a short period of time; for example,
`following a single hemorrhage episode. Alternately, iron replenishment may be
`necessary over a long period of time due to on-going iron losses, as may occur with low-
`grade, recurrent hemorrhage. The Injectafer clinical development program for the
`
`3
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 3
`
`

`

`proposed indication generally focused upon the short term replacement of iron (through a
`maximum of a 2,500 mg iron deficit). Clinical data supporting the safety and efficacy of
`repeat Injectafer "cycles" were supplied from studies of patients with chronic kidney
`disease, a market population not currently cited in the proposed Injectafer indication.
`
`While oral iron is probably the most common iron replacement product for the broad
`population of patients with iron deficiency, three iron products are currently marketed for
`intravenous use among some patients with iron deficiency anemia. These products
`consist of:
`
`a. Iron dextran (for example, Dexferrum®, InFed®), indicated for patients with iron
`deficiency anemia (any cause) "in whom oral administration [of iron] is unsatisfactory or
`impossible."
`
`b. Ferric gluconate (Ferrlecit®), indicated for patients with iron deficiency anemia who
`are undergoing chronic hemodialysis and receiving erythropoietin therapy.
`
`c. Iron sucrose (Venofer®), indicated for patients with iron deficiency anemia who are:
`
`-non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease patients (receiving an
`
`
`
`erythropoietin or not)
`
`-hemodialysis dependent chronic kidney disease patients receiving an
`
`
`erythropoietin
`
`-peritoneal dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease patients receiving an
`
`
`erythropoietin.
`
`
`
`3. Dosage Considerations:
`The maximum iron dose for administration at any one time (single dose) for most
`currently marketed parenteral iron products is generally 200 mg or less. However,
`Venofer is approved for use as a maximum of a 400 mg single dose administration to
`certain patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. The maximum Venofer (single) dose is
`limited to 200 mg in other patient populations.
`
`If approved, Injectafer would be relatively unique among the parenteral iron products in
`that the maximum (single) Injectafer dose is 1,000 mg (or 15 mg/kg).
`
`4. Efficacy Data:
`The major efficacy outcomes in the Injectafer clinical development program related to
`detection of change in blood hemoglobin concentrations. In general, the studies enrolled
`patients with iron deficiency anemia and used changes in hemoglobin concentrations as
`the primary efficacy endpoints. The endpoints compared either the proportions of
`patients achieving a pre-specified definition of anemia correction or a comparison of the
`change in hemoglobin value between baseline and a pre-specified time point.
`
`The studies were not designed sufficiently to meaningfully assess potential clinical
`benefits beyond changes in hemoglobin concentration. For example, most studies were
`
`4
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 4
`
`

`

`open label such that unbiased assessment of any changes in "health-related quality of life"
`in these studies is impossible due to knowledge of the treatment assignment.
`
`The efficacy studies consistently showed that Injectafer administration increased blood
`hemoglobin concentrations. Hence, the supplied data provide substantial evidence of the
`efficacy of Injectafer in iron replenishment.
`
`5. Safety
`The major safety concern from the clinical development program relates to a mortality
`safety signal as evidenced by three notable findings, as listed below.
`
`a. An imbalance in death rates:
`
`In the entire clinical development program, death occurred among 10 patients who
`received Injectafer while one death occurred among a patient who received a control drug
`(Venofer). Five of the 10 deaths among patients receiving Injectafer appeared to relate to
`a cardiac abnormality.
`
`Studies in the development program varied in design, including the use of a 1:1
`randomization for several controlled studies, a randomized cross-over design (placebo-
`Injectafer) for one major study, an uneven randomization ratio in some controlled studies
`as well as uncontrolled studies. Nevertheless, the deaths among patients receiving
`Injectafer were distributed among multiple studies.
`
`Within the pool of randomized, controlled studies (that included a placebo-controlled,
`randomized, cross-over study), six deaths occurred among patients in the Injectafer group
`and one death in a patient treated with Venofer. Exclusive of the randomized, cross-over
`study, deaths in randomized, controlled studies consisted of 5/1206 (0.4%) for Injectafer
`and 1/994 (0.1%) for the control iron product.
`
`b. An imbalance in reports of serious adverse events, especially serious cardiac
`events:
`
`Within the pool of active-controlled, multicenter studies, a serious adverse event was
`reported by 43/1206 (3.6%) of Injectafer-treated patients and 21/834 (2.5%) of patients
`receiving oral iron (control product). Serious "cardiac" events were reported in 13/1206
`(1.1%) of Injectafer-treated patients and 3/834 (0.4%) of patients receiving oral iron
`(control product).
`
`c. An imbalance in the occurrence of "clinically important" hypophosphatemia
`
`Serum phosphorus was not measured rigorously in all clinical studies. However, data are
`available for the proposed market population. Specifically, 8% of postpartum patients
`and 70% of heavy uterine bleeding patients experienced "clinically important
`hypophasphatemia" following Injectafer administration. "Clinically important"
`hypophaphatemia was not reported among patients receiving oral iron. "Clinically
`
`5
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 5
`
`

`

`important" hypophasphatemia was defined as a serum phosphate concentration < 2
`mg/dL.
`
`Hence, the mortality safety signal is not based upon statistical comparisons. Instead, the
`clinical pattern of a numeric imbalance in mortality, combined with imbalances in serious
`adverse events (especially cardiac events) and clinically important hypophosphatemia
`suggest that the proposed Injectafer dose regimen may be associated with important
`safety concerns.
`
`6. Purpose of the Advisory Committee Discussion
`The Advisory Committee is convened to provide an independent assessment of the
`importance, if any, of the mortality safety signal detected in the Injectafer clinical
`development program. FDA anticipates asking the Committee to address topics related
`to the market approval of the product as well as considerations of additional clinical
`studies, potential dose modifications and potential alterations of the proposed indication.
`
`The Committee discussion is a component of the regulatory review of the Injectafer
`NDA. The NDA was originally submitted to FDA in June, 2006 with a proposed
`indication related to use of the product among four groups of iron deficient patients:
`-heavy uterine bleeding
`-postpartum
`-inflammatory bowel disease
`-hemodialysis patients.
`
`The original FDA review of the application culminated in issuance of a non-approvable
`letter related predominantly to the mortality safety signal. In response to the FDA letter,
`in September, 2007, the sponsor submitted a statistical assessment of the mortality data,
`study reports for two additional studies performed among patients with chronic kidney
`disease and responses to FDA questions. The proposed indication was also changed (in
`November, 2007) to indicate Injectafer only for patients with iron deficiency anemia in
`the post-partum condition or patients with heavy uterine bleeding.
`
`In general, the sponsor does not concur with the FDA concern regarding a mortality
`safety signal and the proposed product label does not address the mortality finding. The
`Advisory Committee is convened to independently assess the clinical data and
`specifically, the data pertinent to assessment of a mortality safety signal.
`
`6
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 6
`
`

`

`Medical Summary Document
`This summary consists of the most pertinent components of the medical officer's draft
`review document
`December 28, 2007
`In this document, Injectafer is sometimes referred to by other names used during the
`clinical development program (Ferinject, FCM or Vit-45).
`
`7
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 7
`
`

`

`Table of Contents
`
`1 Executive Summary................................................................................................................. 10
`2 Backgroud Information........................................................................................................... 13
`2.1 Product Information ............................................................................................................ 13
`2.2 Proposed Indication............................................................................................................. 13
`2.3 Proposed Dose Regimen ..................................................................................................... 13
`3 Clinical Studies......................................................................................................................... 14
`3.1 Table of Clinical Studies..................................................................................................... 14
`3.2 Major Inclusion Criteria and Study Treatment ................................................................... 15
`4 Efficacy Findings...................................................................................................................... 17
`4.1 In Women With Heavy Uterine Bleeding............................................................... ………17
`4.2 In Women With Post-Partum Anemia ................................................................................ 18
`5 Safety Findings......................................................................................................................... 20
`5.1 Extent Of Exposure............................................................................................................. 22
`5.2 Demographic Characteristics .............................................................................................. 23
`5.3 Deaths ................................................................................................................................. 24
`5.4 Serious Cardiac Events ....................................................................................................... 35
`5.5 Hypophosphatemia.............................................................................................................. 41
`5.6 Hypersensitivity Reactions ................................................................................................. 44
`5.7 Adverse Events Leading To Premature Discontinuation Of Study Drug ........................... 45
`5.8 Common Adverse Events ................................................................................................... 47
`6 Overall Assessment .................................................................................................................. 48
`6.1 Efficacy ............................................................................................................................... 48
`6.2 Safety................................................................................................................................... 48
`
`8
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 8
`
`

`

`AE
`ALT
`b.w.
`CAD
`CHF
`CKD
`CI
`CRF
`CRP
`C-section
`CTCAE
`dL
`ECG/EKG
`EPO
`ESRD
`FCM
`Fe[III]
`FeS04
`G
`GFR
`GI
`GGT
`Hb
`HD
`Hct
`HUB
`IBD
`ICM
`IDA
`IND
`IRB
`ITT
`IV
`L
`LFT
`Mg
`MI
`MITT
`mL
`NaCl
`NDA
`ng
`NSS
`NYHA
`PP
`r-HuEPO
`RBC
`SAE
`SD
`TIBC
`TID
`TSAT
`VIT-45
`WBC
`
`LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
`Adverse event
`Alanine aminotransferase
`Body weight
`Coronary artery disease
`Congestive heart failure
`Chronic Kidney Disease
`Confidence Interval
`Case report form
`C-reactive protein
`Cesarean Section
`Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event
` Deciliter
`Electrocardiogram
`Erythropoietin
`End Stage Renal Disease
`Ferric carboxymaltose
`Ferric Iron
`Ferrous Sulfate
`Gram
`Glomerular filtration rate
`Gastrointestinal
`Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase
`Hemoglobin
`Hemodialysis
`Hematocrit
`Heavy uterine bleeding
`Inflammatory Bowel Disease
`Iron Carboxymaltose
`Iron Deficiency Anemia
`Investigational New Drug
`Institutional Review Board
`Intent-To-Treat
`Intravenous
`Liter
`Liver function test
`Milligram
`Myocardial infarction
`Modified Intent to Treat
`Milliliter
`Sodium chloride
`New Drug Application
`Nanogram
`Normal Saline Solution
`New York Heart Association
`Per Protocol
`Recombinant human erythropoietin
`Red blood cell
`Serious adverse event
`Standard Deviation
`Total iron binding capacity
`Three times daily
`Transferrin saturation
`Ferinject/Injectafer
`White Blood Cell
`
`9
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 9
`
`

`

`1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`
`Injectafer (Ferinject) is a Type I polynuclear iron (III)-hydroxide carbohydrate complex
`being developed as an intravenous iron product for treatment of iron deficiency anemia.
`The currently proposed indication is the treatment for iron deficiency anemia in patients
`with heavy uterine bleeding or post-partum patients with iron deficiency anemia. The
`proposed dose regimen is 1,000 mg as a single maximum dose weekly until
`administration of the total calculated iron requirement or a maximum total cumulative
`dose of 2,500 mg is reached.
`
`Multiple clinical studies were performed during the Injectafer development program
`although four randomized controlled studies are especially pertinent to support the
`proposed indication for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in women with heavy
`uterine bleeding (one study) or post-partum anemia (three studies). Of these four studies,
`efficacy results from two studies showed superiority of Injectafer to oral iron and two
`studies showed non-inferiority to oral iron. The supplied data indicates that Injectafer
`administration results in iron replenishment with improvement in blood hemoglobin
`concentrations.
`
`The integrated review of safety included the results from 14 completed clinical studies.
`A total of 2080 patients in completed clinical studies were exposed to Injectafer
`treatment. In these studies, 1571 patients received the control treatments, including 834
`who received oral iron product, 145 who received Venofer (iron sucrose) and 592 who
`received placebo (in a cross-over study and a single dose safety study).
`
`The safety review raised concerns for Injectafer due to evidence of a mortality signal. Of
`note, the clinical development program was not designed to thoroughly assess mortality
`due to the relatively small database sample size (given the overall low mortality rate) and
`the study design features. For example, more subjects were exposed to Injectafer than a
`control drug since randomization was not consistently one to one. Nevertheless, the
`overall imbalance and pattern of mortality raises concerns.
`
`The evidence of a mortality safety signal is based upon the numeric imbalance in deaths
`from a database insufficiently sized to rule out an important mortality risk for Injectafer
`as well as imbalances in serious adverse event rates (especially for cardiac events) and
`the excessive rate of hypophosphatemia among subjects receiving Injectafer.
`
`The clinical database for Injectafer is open to multiple interpretations as to which studies
`should be classified among the "randomized, controlled studies" as well as to how the
`data should be analyzed based upon comparisons to oral iron or Venofer. Hence, in
`presentations, the sponsor and FDA may occasionally refer to data presentations that
`differ based upon differences in data pooling, data interpretation and the approach to
`summarization of the data.
`
`Mortality
`
`10
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 10
`
`

`

`There were 10 deaths in Injectafer-treated patients as compared to one death in the
`control patients in all completed clinical studies. The 10 deaths in Injectafer-treated
`patients consisted of: one postpartum woman, one patient with inflammatory bowel
`disease, three patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, four patients with non-dialysis
`dependent chronic renal failure, and one patient with multi-factorial iron deficiency
`anemia.
`
`In randomized studies, six deaths were reported in Injectafer-treated patients and one
`death was reported in a control patient (a nominal rate of 0.33% vs. 0.06%). These
`randomized studies include a cross-over study (Study VIT05006) in which subjects were
`randomized between Injectafer and placebo, followed by the complimentary treatment
`one week later (one death occurred after "cross-over" to Injectafer in this study). Some
`analyses may eliminate this study from the group of "randomized, controlled" studies,
`given the cross-over nature of the study. In this situation, the data would be described as
`showing five deaths in the Injectafer group in "randomized, controlled" studies and one
`death in a control group.
`
`Five of the six deaths among Injectafer-treated patients in randomized studies occurred in
`studies using the proposed first-dose 1,000 mg dose regimen. Four of these five patients
`received a single 1,000 mg dose and one patient received an initial 1,000 mg dose
`followed by lower subsequent doses.
`
`Among the 10 Injectafer-treated patients who died, five had received a single dose of
`Injectafer (four received 1,000 mg and one received 200 mg) and five received two or
`more doses of Injectafer. The events leading to nine of 10 deaths occurred within 32
`days of the last Injectafer administration. The sponsor had clinical information reviewed
`by external reviewers to determine the "cause" of death. Nevertheless, determination of
`the "cause" of a death is commonly difficult or impossible and all putative "causes" of
`death are suspect. The FDA review team nominally assessed the "causes" of deaths to
`include five cardiac disorders (two cardiac arrests, one anterior myocardial infarction,
`one heart failure and one cardiac insufficiency), three infections (two cases of sepsis, one
`bowel abscess and perforation), one gastrointestinal bleeding and one motor-vehicle
`accident.
`
`Serious adverse events, especially "cardiac" events
`
`Within the pool of active-controlled, multicenter studies, a serious adverse event was
`reported by 3.6% of Injectafer-treated patients and 2.5% of patients receiving oral iron
`(control product). Serious "cardiac" events were reported in 1.1% of Injectafer-treated
`patients and 0.4% of patients receiving oral iron (control product).
`
`In general, the data pool especially pertinent to consideration of marketing approval
`consists of the group of controlled studies that examined the 1,000 mg (maximum) first
`dose Injectafer regimen. Within this data pool, the occurrence of serious adverse event as
`well as serious "cardiac" events was also unbalanced, with numerically more events
`among patients receiving Injectafer.
`
`11
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 11
`
`

`

`Hypophosphatemia
`
`Serum phosphate decreased in Injectafer-treated patients as compared to oral iron-treated
`patients in the six clinical studies where serum phosphate levels were measured. The
`incidence of hypophosphatemia varied among the studies but the overall pattern indicates
`that Injectafer administration was associated with an increased risk of clinically
`significant hypophosphatemia, compared to control products. For example, 8% of
`postpartum and 70% of heavy uterine bleeding patients reached a nadir serum phosphate
`of < 2.0 mg/dL. The phosphate nadirs in the heavy uterine bleeding patients occurred at a
`median of 15 days and recovered at a median of 18 days.
`
`12
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 12
`
`

`

`2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
`
`2.1 Product Information
`
`Injectafer (Ferinject) is a Type I polynuclear iron (III)-hydroxide carbohydrate complex
`being developed as an intravenous iron product for treatment of iron deficiency anemia.
`
`Current available treatment for iron deficiency anemia includes oral iron products and
`intravenous iron products. Approved intravenous iron products include iron dextran,
`Ferrlecit (ferric gluconate) and Venofer (iron sucrose). With respect to the dose regimen
`for these other intravenous iron products, the generally recommended maximum single
`dose is 100 mg of elemental iron for iron dextran, 125 mg of elemental iron for Ferrlecit,
`and up to 400 mg for Venofer. Hence, the proposed maximum single dose of Injectafer
`(1,000 mg) is more than twice that of any currently approved intravenous iron product.
`
`2.2 Proposed Indication
`
`In the original NDA submission dated June 15, 2006, the proposed indication was the
`treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with heavy uterine bleeding, post-partum
`anemia, inflammatory bowel disease and hemodialysis. However, on November 14,
`2007, the sponsor revised the proposed indication to the treatment of iron deficiency
`anemia in women with heavy uterine bleeding or post-partum patients with iron
`deficiency anemia. Despite the alteration of the proposed indication to a more narrow
`population of patients who may be healthier and less likely to need repeat "cycles" of
`Injectafer iron replenishment, FDA maintains that the totality of the clinical data from the
`development program are important to the assessment of Injectafer's risks and benefits.
`
`2.3 Proposed Dose Regimen
`
`Injectafer is administered intravenously either by rapid intravenous (IV) push injection or
`by IV infusion. The dose is determined by calculating the total iron requirement and
`dividing this total amount into one to three doses.
`
`Total iron requirement (cumulative dose) in mgs: Patient weight in kg x (15 – current Hb
`g/dL) x 2.4 + 500. Maximum total dose not to exceed 2,500 mg.
`If patient is postpartum use pre-pregnancy weight
`(cid:120)
`If TSAT > 20% and ferritin > 50 ng/mL subtract 500 mg
`(cid:120)
`(cid:120) Round dose to nearest 100 mg
`
`Maximum single dose must not exceed 15 mg/kg per dose or 1,000 mg, whichever is
`lower. The single doses should be administered every 7 days until the total iron
`requirement or a maximum of 2,500 mg is reached.
`600 to 1,000 mg doses: Dilute in 250 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride, USP and
`(cid:120)
`administer by IV infusion over (cid:149) 15 minutes or undiluted IV push injection
`over 15 minutes
`(cid:120) < 500 mg doses: Administer undiluted by IV push injection at 100 mg per
`minute
`
`13
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 13
`
`

`

`The sponsor's proposed label provides no specific recommendations regarding the
`Injectafer dosage for patients who may develop iron deficiency anemia following iron
`replenishment with a first "cycle" of Injectafer. Conceivably, additional "cycles" of
`Injectafer would be administered to these patients.
`
`Repeat "cycle" data were supplied from studies conducted among patients with iron
`deficiency anemia who also had chronic kidney disease. Repeat "cycle" data have not
`been supplied for other patient populations, including women with heavy uterine bleeding
`and iron deficiency anemia or women with post-partum iron deficiency anemia.
`
`3. CLINICAL STUDIES
`
`3.1 Table of Clinical Studies
`
`Fourteen clinical studies were completed to support the safety and efficacy of Injectafer
`for the indication for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia. The following table lists
`all completed clinical studies.
`
`Summary of completed clinical studies
`Studies
`Type of
`Injectafer
`studies
`group
`
`Study
`Populations
`
`Heavy Uterine
`Bleeding
`
`Post-partum
`Anemia
`
`Inflammatory
`Bowel Disease
`
`1VIT04002/
`1VIT04003
`
`VIT-IV-CL-
`009
`
`Randomized, open-
`label, parallel
`group, superiority
`study
`1VIT03001 Randomized, open-
`label, parallel
`group, non-
`inferiority study
`Randomized, open-
`label, parallel
`group, non-
`inferiority study
`1VIT06011 Randomized, open-
`label, parallel
`group, superiority
`study
`Randomized, open-
`label, parallel
`group, non-
`inferiority study
`Single arm,
`baseline-controlled
`study
`
`VIT-IV-CL-
`008
`
`VIT-IV-CL-
`003
`
`Control
`group
`
`231
`(oral iron)
`
`179
`(oral iron)
`
`118
`(oral iron)
`
`148
`(oral iron)
`
`63
`(oral iron)
`
`246
`
`182
`
`231
`
`143
`
`137
`
`46
`
`none
`
`Total
`patients
`enrolled
`477
`
`361
`
`349
`
`291
`
`200
`
`46
`
`14
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 14
`
`

`

`Hemodialysis
`
`Non-dialysis
`Dependent chronic
` kidney disease
`
`Iron deficiency
`anemia
`(For safety only)
`
`Chronic heart
`failure
`
`Single dose, PK
`and safety study
`
`VIT-IV-CL-
`001
`
`Single dose, PK and
`safety study
`
`1VIT05006 Single dose, cross-
`over safety study
`Pilot, randomized,
`double-blind,
`controlled study
`
`FER-CARS-
`01
`
`VIT-IV-CL-
`015
`
`Randomized, open-
`label, parallel group
`study
`VIT-53214 Single arm,
`baseline-controlled
`study
`1VIT04004 Randomized, open-
`label, parallel group
`study
`Single arm,
`treatment extension
`safety study
`
`1VIT05005
`(extension
`of
`1VIT04004)
`VIT-IV-CL-
`02
`
`119
`
`162
`
`147
`
`127
`
`24
`
`6
`
`584
`
`30
`
`119
`(Venofer)
`
`none
`
`103
`
`none
`
`8
`(Placebo)
`
`-
`
`569
`(Placebo)
`27
`(Venofer)
`15
`(placebo)
`
`238
`
`162
`
`250
`
`127
`
`32
`
`6
`
`72
`
`3.2 Major Inclusion Criteria and Study Treatment
`
`The following table shows the major inclusion criteria and study treatment in each study.
`
`Major inclusion criteria and study treatment
`
`Study
`populations
`
`Heavy Uterine
`Bleeding
`
`Post-partum
`Anemia
`
`Studies
`
`Major inclusion criteria
`
`Study treatment and duration
`
`1VIT04002/ Hb (cid:148)11.4 g/dL and 2
`1VIT04003
`mean Hb (cid:148)11.0 g/dL
`TSAT (cid:148)25%.
`Ferritin (cid:148)100 ng/mL.
`History of heavy uterine
`bleeding within the past 6
`months
`1VIT03001 Hb (cid:148)10.0 g/dL
`TSAT (cid:148)50%.
`Ferritin (cid:148)500 ng/mL.
`
`Injectafer:
`Total (cumulative) dose=
`weight (kg) x (15- hemoglobin [g/dL]) x
`2.4 + 500 mg
`If TSAT >20% and Ferritin >50 ng/mL
`subtract 500 mg
`Maximum single dose: 1000 mg
`Maximum cumulative dose: 2,500 mg
`
`Administration:
`
`15
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 15
`
`

`

`VIT-IV-CL-009
`
`Within 10 days of
`delivery
`Hb (cid:148)10.5 g/dL
`Within 6 days of delivery
`
`200 mg: undiluted IV push over 1-2
`minutes
`300-400 mg: in 100 cc NS over 6 minutes
`500-1,000 mg: in 250 cc NS over 15
`minutes
`
`1VIT06011 Hb (cid:148)10.0 g/dL
`TSAT (cid:148)25%.
`Ferritin (cid:148)100 ng/mL.
`Within 10 days of
`delivery
`
`Inflammatory
`Bowel Disease
`
`VIT-IV-CL-008Hb (cid:148)11.0 g/dL
`TSAT <20%.
`Ferritin <100 ng/mL.
`
`VIT-IV-CL-
`003
`
`Iron deficiency anemia
`with a calculated total
`iron requirement (cid:149)1000
`mg
`
`Hemodialysis
`
`VIT-IV-CL-015Hb (cid:148)11.5 g/dL
`TSAT <20%.
`Ferritin <200 ng/mL.
`
`VIT-53214 hemodialysis associated
`anemia
`1VIT04004 Hb (cid:148)11 g/dL
`TSAT <25%.
`Ferritin <300 ng/mL.
`
`Non-dialysis
`dependent chro
` kidney disease
`
`Oral iron:
`Ferrous sulfate 325 mg three times a day
`for 6 weeks for Studies 1VIT4002/04003
`and 1VIT03001
`
`Ferrous sulfate 100 mg twice daily for 12
`weeks for Study VIT-IV-CL-009
`Same as Study 1VIT04002/04003 and
`1VIT03001 except for administration:
`<500 mg: undiluted as a slow IV injection
`at a rate of 100 mg/minute
`600-1000 mg: either undiluted as slow IV
`injection over 15 minutes or as an IV
`infusion diluted in 250 cc NSS over 15
`minutes
`Injectafer: same as 1VIT04002/04003
`Oral iron:
`Ferrous sulfate 100 mg twice daily for 12
`weeks
` Injectafer:
`500 mg/weekly x 4 doses or
`1000 mg weekly x 2 doses
`Diluted in 250 cc NSS and infusion over
`15 minutes
`Injectafer or Venofer:
`Total dose=weight (kg) x (15- hemoglobin
`[g/dL]) x 2.4 + 500 mg
`Administered 200 mg as undiluted directly
`into dialysis line two or three times
`weekly during hemodialysis
`Injectafer: same as Study VIT-IV-CL-015
`
`Day 0: 1000 mg
`Day 17 and 31: 500 mg if TSAT <30%
`and ferritin <500 ng/mL
`
`Administration:
`201-500 mg: in 100 cc NS over 15
`minutes
`501-1,000 mg: in 250 cc NS over 15
`minutes
`
`Oral iron:
`Ferrous sulfate 325 mg three times daily
`
`16
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1013, p. 16
`
`

`

`Iron deficiency
`anemia
`(for safety
`only)
`
`Chronic heart
`failure
`
`for 8 weeks
`Enrolled in 1VIT04004 1000 mg if TSAT<25% and ferritin <300
`ng/mL
`500 mg if TSAT<30% and ferritin <500
`ng/mL
`Injectafer:
`1000 mg single dose
`
`Placebo
`
`Injectafer or Venofer:
`200 mg weekly until total calculated dose
`was reached.
`
`1VIT05005
`(

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket