throbber
Research in Veterinary Science 1999, 66, 179–184
`Article No. rvsc.1998.0223, available online at http://idealibrary.com on
`
`An evaluation of iron-dextran supplementation in piglets
`administered by injection on the first, third or fourth
`day after birth
`
`A. K. EGELI, T. FRAMSTAD, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction
`and Forensic Medicine, POB. 8146 Dep. 0033 Oslo, Norway
`
`SUMMARY
`
`The aims of the study were to evaluate the effect of iron-dextran injection given on the first, third or fourth day after birth on haema-
`tology in piglets. An advanced automated blood analyser; Technicon H*1®, which performs a complete blood cell count and leuko-
`cyte differential counts was used to analyse the blood. Six litters of Norwegian Landrace x Yorkshire piglets were included in the
`study. The day after birth (day 1), half of the piglets in each litter (split litters) were injected subcutaneously with 180 mg iron as
`iron-dextran (1·5 ml Idofer®). The untreated piglets from two of the litters were injected with the same amount of iron-dextran on
`day 3, and those from the remaining four litters on day 4. The piglets were weighed and blood samples collected on days 1, 3 or 4,
`7, 14 and 21. Erythropoiesis, but not leukocyte count, responded to injection on day 1 compared with injection on the third or fourth
`day. The difference between groups in haematological parameters was greatest on day 7. The two groups of piglets treated on day 1
`had a haemoglobin concentration (Hb) ±SD of 92 g litre–1 (±9) and 94 g litre–1 (±9), and the piglets treated on day 3 had a Hb of 81 g
`litre–1 (±7) and the one treated on day 4 had a Hb of 78 g litre–1 (±7) on day 7. On days 14 and 21 there were no differences between
`groups. This study indicates that some piglets were anaemic and responded to subcutanous iron injection on day 1.
`
`DOMESTIC piglets are born with very low iron reserves
`and receive too little iron from sows’ milk (Venn et al
`1947). Modern pig husbandry practices prevent contact
`with soil, the main source of iron for piglets in the wild.
`Pigs have been bred for high weight gain for many years,
`and this has also affected iron requirements in piglets. The
`Norwegian Landrace breed is a very fast growing breed
`with large litter size and high birth weight. The average
`weight on the day after birth in pure Norwegian Landrace
`and cross-bred Yorkshire piglets has been found to be
`between 1·5 and 1·9 kg in different studies. The average
`haemoglobin concentration (Hb) the day after birth has been
`found to be between 78 and 92 g litre–1 and average numbr
`of erythrocytes (RBC) between 3·7 and 4·5 x 109 litre–1 in
`these herds (Egeli and Framstad 1998a,b, Egeli et al
`1998c). This indicates that the Norwegian Landrace and
`crossbred Yorkshire piglets are born anaemic. If this
`anaemia is caused by iron deficiency, the piglets should be
`treated soon after birth. On the other hand possible detri-
`mental effects of high doses of iron to newborn piglets may
`not make it suitable to treat early in life especially if the
`piglets do not need, or are not able to utilise the iron admin-
`istered (Bollwahn et al 1972, Holmgren 1996, Egeli and
`Framstad 1998a).
`The aims of the study were to evaluate the effect on
`haematology of iron-dextran injection on the first, third or
`fourth day after birth in piglets with high birth weight and
`weight gain. An automatic blood analyser, Technicon H*1®
`(Bayer Instruments Corp., Tarrytown, NY, USA) which per-
`form complete blood cell counts and leukocyte differential
`counts, and is able to detect early changes in red cell sub-
`populations, was used in this study to evaluate haematological
`
`changes in the early postnatal period in piglets treated with
`iron on three different days.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`The study took place in a commercial herd which as kept
`under a good standard of health care and husbandry. All the
`investigations and treatments were performed by a veteri-
`narian. The litters were kept with the sows in farrowing
`crates on a concrete floor covered with sawdust. Two-thirds
`of the floor was solid but the area behind the sows was per-
`forated. The floor was scraped clean every day. The sows
`were fed commercial pelleted food and sour milk, but the
`piglets received only sow’s milk and no creep feed. The pigs
`were first to fifth litters, litter size to weaning ranged from
`nine to 13 piglets. The sows were free from sarcoptic man-
`age, routinely treated for gastrointestinal helminths, and
`vaccinated against porcine parvovirus, swine erysipelas and
`Escherichia coli infections. The piglets were treated prophy-
`toltrazuril (Baycox®: Kiel,
`lactically with 20 mg kg–1
`Germany) against coccidiosis on the fifth day after birth.
`The male piglets were not castrated during the study. The
`study was ethically discussed and found to follow the laws
`concerning research animals.
`
`Trial 1
`Forty-eight Norwegian Landrace x Yorkshire piglets from
`four litters were divided randomly into two groups (split
`litters). All piglets were individually tattooed with a number
`in the ear. The piglets in one group received 180 mg iron as
`
`0034-5288/99/030179 + 06 $18.00/0
`
`© 1999 W. B. Saunders Company Ltd
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1062, p. 1
`
`

`
`180
`
`A. K. Egeli, T. Framstad
`
`TABLE 1: Haematology during the preweaning period in Trial 1 (Mean ± SD). The piglets in T1D1 were injected with 180 mg iron as iron-dextran on day
`1 and the piglets in T1D4 on day 4
`
`Hb
`g litre–1
`RBC
`(x 1012 litre–1)
`MCV
`(fl)
`MCH
`(pg)
`MCHC
`(g litre–1)
`RDW (per cent)
`HDW (g litre–1)
`
`T1D1
`
`90
`(14)
`4·48
`(0·72)
`64·5
`(3·5)
`20·0
`(1·3)
`311
`(10)
`16·8
`31·7
`
`Day 1
`
`T1D4
`
`Day 4
`T1D1
`
`T1D4
`
`Day 7
`T1D1
`
`84
`(14)
`4·13
`(0·74)
`65·0
`(3·3)
`20·3
`(1·0)
`313
`(8)
`16·9
`32·5
`
`80
`(10)
`3·83
`(0·57)
`69·3
`(4·1)
`21·0
`(1·2)
`303
`(6)
`24·3
`30·7
`
`70b
`(9)
`3·59
`(0·56)
`64·0c
`(3·3)
`19·8b
`(1·6)
`308
`(15)
`18·7c
`33·9c
`
`94
`(9)
`4·29
`(0·62)
`73·7
`(5·5)
`22·0
`(1·4)
`299
`(9)
`22·2
`24·8
`
`T1D4
`
`78c
`(7)
`3·75b
`(0·51)
`69·6a
`(4·6)
`20·9a
`(1·3)
`301
`(8)
`27·3c
`29·5c
`
`Day 14
`T1D1
`
`T1D4
`
`Day 21
`T1D1
`T1D4
`
`103
`(8)
`4·79
`(0·60)
`67·9
`(5·5)
`21·5
`(1·5)
`317
`(10)
`18·1
`22·9
`
`103
`(7)
`4·77
`(0·56)
`68·5
`(5·3)
`21·7
`(1·6)
`317
`(9)
`20·2c
`24·6b
`
`103
`(9)
`5·52
`(0·50)
`61·4
`(4·3)
`18·7
`(1·6)
`305
`(8)
`18·2
`23·9
`
`103
`(12)
`5·49
`(0·64)
`60·7
`(5·4)
`18·9
`(2·0)
`310
`(9)
`20·1
`25·0
`
`SD in parenthesis. a = P<0·05, b = P<0·01, c = P<0·001 between groups
`
`colloidal ferri-dextran (Idofer®; St. Galen, Switzerland) by
`subcutaneous injection in the inguinal area 19-26 hours after
`birth (day 1). This group was designated T1D1 (trial 1,
`treated day 1). The piglets in the other group received iden-
`tical iron treatment on the fourth day after birth, this group
`being designated T1D4 (trial 1, treated day 4). All the piglets
`were weighed, and 1 ml blood collected using ethylenedi-
`aminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA) as an anticoagulant, using a
`method described previously (Framstad et al 1988), before
`treatment in the morning on day 1 and on days 4, 7, 14
`and 21. One sow suffered from mastitis-metritis-agalactia
`(MMA) and three of her piglets were raised by other sows.
`
`Trial 2
`
`Twenty piglets (two litters) were divided in two groups
`(split litters). One group of piglets was given 180 mg iron as
`colloidal ferri-dextran (Idofer®) by subcutaneous injection
`12–24 hours after birth (day 1), the group being designated
`T2D1 (trial 2, treated day 1). The piglets in the other group
`were given identical iron treatment on the third day after
`birth, this group being designated T2D3 (trial 2, treated day
`3). The piglets were weighed and 1 ml blood was collected
`as in trial 1 on days 1, 3, 7 and 14.
`An automated blood analyser; the Technicon H*1® (H*1)
`was used in this study. H*1 utilises the principles of auto-
`mated cytochemistry and laser light scatter in a flow cytome-
`ter to perform cell counts and leukocyte differential counts
`(Simson et al 1988). Erythrograms of the distribution of ery-
`throcyte size and haemoglobin concentration were also pre-
`sented visually by the H*1 for each piglet. The erythrocyte
`count (RBC), haemoglobin concentration (Hb), mean cell vol-
`ume (MCV), erythrocyte distribution width (i.e., coefficient of
`variation of the RBC volume histogram) (RDW) and haemoglo-
`bin distribution width (i.e. standard deviation of the haemo-
`globin concentration histogram) (HDW), as well as the number
`of leukocytes (WBC), neutrophilic granulocytes (NEUT), lym-
`phocytes (LYMP), monocytes (MONO), eosinophilic granulo-
`cytes (EOS), basophilic granulocytes (BASO) and large
`unstained cells (LUC), were measured by the H*1. The mean
`cell haemoglobin (MCH) and mean cell haemoglobin concen-
`tration (MCHC) were estimated by the H*1 from RBC and Hb in
`MCH and from RBC, Hb and MCV in MCHC. All samples taken
`on day 1 were analysed within four hours. A few samples
`
`taken on other days were stored for practical reasons in a
`refrigerator for 24 hours before analysis.
`Comparison of two means was performed using the t-test
`(Altman 1993). The development of haematological param-
`eters within groups was examined using a paired t-test.
`Relationships between the changes in MCV from day 1 to
`day 4 and Hb on day 1, and also between changes in MCV
`from day 4 to day 7 and Hb on day 4, were plotted and deter-
`mined in trial 1 using linear regression (Altman 1993).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Tables 1 and 2 show the development and differences
`between groups in haematological parameters in the two tri-
`als in the pre-weaning period. Hb and RBC counts decreased
`in both groups from day 1 to day 3 or 4 (P<0·001), and
`increased to the day 1 level in T1D1 and T2D1 on day 7.
`The piglets injected on day 3 or 4 had a lesser increase to
`day 7. MCV, MCH and RDW developed differently in the two
`groups from day 1 to day 3 or 4. As the new immature red
`cells are larger, there will be an increase in MCV and RDW
`when the production of new cells are high. With high
`haemoglobin production, MCH will also increase. In both tri-
`als the iron-treated piglets showed an increase in MCV and
`MCH and a higher increase in RDW than the untreated piglets
`from day 1 to day 3 or 4 (P<0·001). T2D3 and T1D4 piglets
`had an increase in MCV, MCH and RDW from day 3 or 4 to
`day 7 (P<0·001). HDW also showed a more rapid decrease in
`the piglets treated with iron on day 1 than the other groups.
`MCHC decreased from day 1 to day 7 in all groups
`(P<0·001). T1D1 piglets had higher Hb, MCH (P<0·01), MCV
`and RDW (P<0·001) than T1D4 piglets on day 4 and higher
`Hb (P<0·001), RBC (P<0·01), MCH and MCV (P<0·05) on day
`7. T2D1 piglets had higher MCV, MCH and RDW than T2D3
`piglets on day 3 (P<0·05), and higher Hb and RBC on day 7
`(P<0·05). RDW was in T1D1 piglets lower than in T1D4
`piglets on day 7 and day 14 (P<0·001), and HDW was lower
`on days 4, 7 (P<0·001) and 14 (P≤0·01). T2D1 piglets had
`lower RDW than T2D3 piglets on day 7 (P<0·01), and lower
`HDW on day 3 (P<0·01) and day 7 (P<0·05). In T1 Hb, RDW
`and HDW were of the same order of magnitude on day 14
`and day 21. MCV, MCH and MCHC decreased from day 14 to
`day 21 (P<0·05–P<0·001).
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1062, p. 2
`
`

`
`Iron-dextran supplementation in piglets
`
`181
`
`TABLE 2: Haematology during the preweaning period in Trial 2 (Mean ± SD). The piglets in T2D1 were injected
`with 180 mg iron as iron-dextran on Day 1 and the piglets in T2D3 on day 3
`
`Day 1
`T2D1
`T2D3
`
`Day 3
`T2D1
`T2D3
`
`Day 7
`T2D1
`T2D3
`
`Day 14
`T2D1
`T2D3
`
`Hb
`(g litre–1)
`RBC
`(x 1012 litre–1)
`MCV
`(fl)
`MCH
`(pg)
`MCHC
`(g litre–1)
`RDW (per cent)
`HDW (g litre–1)
`
`93
`(24)
`4·21
`(0·97)
`72·0
`(3·7)
`21·9
`(1·0)
`305
`(7)
`17·7
`31·2
`
`88
`(16)
`4·04
`(0·70)
`71·1
`(1·9)
`21·9
`(0·5)
`308
`(8)
`17·0
`32·0
`
`82
`(16)
`3·73
`(0·74)
`74·1
`4·0)
`22·1
`(1·0)
`298
`(9)
`22·3
`27·7
`
`72
`(11)
`3·39
`(0·48)
`69·9a
`(1·5)
`21·1a
`(0·7)
`301
`(6)
`18·2a
`30·9b
`
`92
`(9)
`4·07
`(0·45)
`79·0
`(7·3)
`22·7
`(1·7)
`288
`(9)
`23·7
`27·0
`
`81a
`(7)
`3·62a
`(0·24)
`79·2
`(1·9)
`22·4
`(0·7)
`283
`(6)
`28·6b
`29·5a
`
`109
`(13)
`5·02
`(0·54)
`71·2
`(2·0)
`21·7
`(0·8)
`305
`(10)
`19·1
`22·7
`
`103
`(8)
`4·74
`(0·29)
`72·3
`(3·1)
`21·7
`(0·8)
`301
`(9)
`20·8
`23·6
`
`SD in parenthesis, a = P<0·05, b = P<0·01, c = P<0·001 between groups
`
`in Trial 1
`the preweaning period
`in absolute numbers during
`and differential counts
`TABLE 3: WBC
`(Mean ± SD). The piglets in T1D1 were injected with 180 mg iron as iron-dextran on day 1 and the piglets in T1D4 on day 4
`
`WBC
`(x 109 litre–1)
`
`Day 1
`T1D1
`T1D4
`
`Day 4
`T1D1
`T1D4
`
`Day 7
`T1D1
`T1D4
`
`Day 14
`T1D1
`T1D4
`
`Day 21
`T1D1
`
`T1D4
`
`WBC
`
`NEUT
`
`LYMP
`
`MONO
`
`EOS
`
`BASO
`
`LUC
`
`9·3
`(2·4)
`6·8
`(2·1)
`2·0
`(0·4)
`0·21
`(0·08)
`0·12
`(0·06)
`0·01
`(0·01)
`0·19
`(0·09)
`
`7·6a
`(1·7)
`5·1b
`(1·5)
`1·9
`(0·6)
`0·17
`(0·06)
`0·12
`(0·06)
`0·01
`(0·01)
`0·18
`(0·13)
`
`11·1
`(3·8)
`6·6
`(3·0)
`3·5
`(1·3)
`0·35
`(0·15)
`0·23
`(0·17)
`0·03
`(0·02)
`0·27
`(0·12)
`
`9·3
`(2·8)
`4·8a
`(2·4)
`3·7
`(1·2)
`0·32
`(0·17)
`0·17
`(0·11)
`0·03
`(0·02)
`0·25
`(0·11)
`
`11·2
`(2·6)
`5·9
`(1·7)
`4·5
`(1·2)
`0·28
`(0·11)
`0·19
`(0·13)
`0·04
`(0·02)
`0·31
`(0·17)
`
`12·1
`(3·3)
`6·2
`(2·9)
`5·1
`(1·4)
`0·33
`(0·12)
`0·16
`(0·11)
`0·04
`(0·03)
`0·31
`(0·15)
`
`8·1
`(4·1)
`3·0
`(1·7)
`4·3
`(2·7)
`0·19
`(0·10)
`0·08
`(0·05)
`0·05
`(0·09)
`0·18
`(0·12)
`
`7·0
`(2·0)
`2·3
`(0·9)
`4·2
`(1·3)
`0·15
`(0·06)
`0·14
`(0·15)
`0·04
`(0·05)
`0·15
`(0·07)
`
`15·7
`(4·2)
`3·9
`(1·2)
`10·7
`(3·2)
`0·42
`(0·13)
`0·14
`(0·11)
`0·09
`(0·04)
`0·56
`(0·18)
`
`15·4
`(2·9)
`4·0
`(1·7)
`10·2
`(1·8)
`0·40
`(0·10)
`0·12
`(0·11)
`0·08
`(0·04)
`0·52
`(0·15)
`
`SD in parenthesis. a = P<0·05, b = P<0·01, c = P<0·001 between groups
`
`Clinically, the piglets in T1D4 were observed to be paler
`than the piglets in T1D1 on day 4.
`The development in total white cell counts (WBC) and the
`results from the differential counts in Trail 1 are shown in
`Table 3. WBC increased from day 1 to day 7 (P<0·05 in
`T1D1, and P<0·001 in T1D4). Values in both groups
`decreased from day 7 to day 14 (P<0·01) and increased from
`day 14 to day 21 (P<0·001). There was a difference between
`groups in WBC (P<0·05) and NEUT (P<0·01) on day 1 with
`the highest values in T1D1. The difference in NEUT was still
`present on day 4 (P<0·05). Changes in WBC in trial 2 fol-
`lowed the same main pattern as in trial 1. Values were of the
`same order of magnitude, and there were no differences
`between groups.
`Fig 1 shows the plots and linear regression of the relation-
`ship between Hb on day 1 and the changes in MCV from day
`1 to day 4 in T1D1 (Fig 1a) and in T1D4 (Fig 1b). It also
`shows the relationship between Hb on day 4 and the changes
`in MCV from day 4 to day 7 in T1D1 (Fig 1c) and T1D4 (Fig
`1d). While MCV increase with production of new immature
`cells, Fig 1(a and d) shows that the piglets with the lowest
`initial Hb produced more new cells than the piglets with
`highest initial Hb after they had received iron on day 1 (Fig
`1a) or day 4 (Fig 1d). Fig 1(c) show that the piglets treated
`with iron on day 1, and which had the lowest Hb on day 4,
`also had higher increase in MCV from day 4 to 7, than the
`
`piglets with highest Hb on day 4. Iron deficiency lead to a
`production of microcytic cells. Fig 1(b) shows that the
`untreated piglets with lowest initial Hb produced more
`microcytic cells from day 1 to day 4 than the untreated
`piglets with highest initial Hb levels.
`Average bodyweight in T1D1 and in T1D4 were, respec-
`tively, 1·79 and 1·77 kg on day 1, 3·05 and 2·98 kg on day 7,
`5·23 and 5·16 kg on day 14, and 7·15 and 6·95 kg on day 21.
`The corresponding figures for T2D1 and T2D3 were,
`respectively, 2·0 and 1·87 kg on day 1, 3·43 and 3·25 kg on
`day 7, and 5·80 and 6·21 kg on day 14.
`Seven piglets (four in T1D1 and three in T1D4) were
`treated for arthritis or infected wounds, and were excluded
`from the study. One blood sample taken on day 7 was
`excluded because of coagulation, as were two differential
`leukocyte counts on day 14 because of analytical problems.
`Three piglets in T2D1 and one piglet in T2D3 were
`treated for arthritis and two piglets in T2D3 died, and all six
`were excluded from the study. One piglet in T2D3 was ill on
`day 14, and results for this piglet on this day were excluded.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`In a former study the precision of the H*1 and the
`effect of one and two days of storage in a refrigerator were
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1062, p. 3
`
`

`
`182
`
`A. K. Egeli, T. Framstad
`
`y = 0·054x – 5·65
`r = 0·57
`P < 0·01
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`90
`100
`Hb (g litre–1) day 1
`
`110
`
`120
`
`y = –0·230x + 21·90
`r = –0·59
`P < 0·01
`
`(b)
`
`14
`12
`10
`
`8 6 2 0
`
`4
`
`–2
`–4
`50
`
`(d)
`
`14
`12
`10
`
`8 6 2 0
`
`4
`
`–2
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`90
`100
`Hb (g litre–1) day 1
`
`110
`
`120
`
`MCV (fl) (day 4 – day 1)
`
`MCV (fl) (day 7 – day 4)
`
`y = –0·116x + 15·11
`r = –0·56
`P = 0·01
`
`(a)
`
`14
`12
`10
`
`8 6 2
`
`4
`
`0
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`100
`80
`90
`Hb (g litre–1) day 1
`
`110
`
`120
`
`y = –0·238x + 23·40
`r = –0·80
`P < 0·001
`
`(c)
`
`14
`12
`10
`
`8 6 2
`
`4
`
`0
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`90
`100
`Hb (g litre–1) day 1
`
`110
`
`120
`
`MCV (fl) (day 4 – day 1)
`
`MCV (fl) (day 7 – day 4)
`
`FIG 1: (a-d): Changes in MCV between the first (day 1) and the fourth day after birth (day 4) plotted against Hb level on day 1 in Group T1D1 (Fig 1a) and Group
`T1D4 (Fig 1b), and also changes in MCV between day 4 and day 7 plotted against Hb levels on day 4 in group T1D1 (Fig 1c) and Group T1D4 (Fig 1d). The piglets
`in T1D1 were injected with 180 mg iron as iron-dextran on day 1 and the piglets in T1D4 on day 4
`
`evaluated in one- and 14-day-old piglets (Egeli et al 1998d).
`In that study the differential counts determined automati-
`cally were also compared with microscopic manual differ-
`ential counts. In a group of 20 piglets the average values
`without and after one and two days of storage were very
`consistent (Egeli et al 1998d). There was also a high correla-
`tion between the automatic and manual differential counts
`for netrophils and lymphocytes in one- and 14-day-old
`piglets (r=0·85–0·93), and the average values between the
`two methods in all white cell types were almost the same.
`The H*1 counts thousands of cells compared with only 100-
`200 in manual microscopic counts and is thereby more reli-
`able (Davies and Fisher 1991). The H*1 report provided a
`lot of information on each piglet and was quite appropriate
`to evaluate erythropoiesis, anaemia, and changes in leuko-
`cyte number and differential counts in piglets.
`Many of the piglets in this study had low Hb on day 1 and
`must be considered to have been anaemic at birth (Fig 1a and
`b). The low Hb on day 1 could have been due to an iron defi-
`ciency anaemia. In adults, iron deficiency anaemia is easily
`diagnosed as a microcytic hypochromic anaemia (Jain 1986).
`In newborn piglets, differences between piglets in plasma
`expansion and hydration could affect Hb and RBC on day 1
`(Egeli and Framstad 1998a). MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW and
`HDW at birth are also difficult to evaluate because of immatu-
`rity of the cells. Both Hb and RBC can be expected to decrease
`from birth to day 4 due to plasma expansion and the rapid
`growth of the piglets, irrespective of iron treatment
`(Bollwahn et al 1972, Furugouri 1975, Egeli and Framstad
`1998a). Such an anaemia is considered to be physiological.
`Changes in RDW or MCV could be used to describe erythro-
`poietic activity in the first week. The MCV value is probably
`
`the most suitable, because it will increase with the produc-
`tion of more macrocytic cells and decrease with the presence
`of more microcytic cells, while RDW will increase with
`increasing numbers of both cell types. From Table 1, it can be
`seen that MCV values were nearly the same on day 1 and day
`4 in untreated piglets. If the piglets with lowest Hb on day 1
`had an iron deficiency anaemia, MCV would be expected to
`decrease in these untreated piglets on day 4 because of pro-
`duction of microcytic cells. This was confirmed to be the
`case, as seen in Fig 1b, by the significant positive correlation
`between Hb level on day 1 and the changes in MCV from day
`1 to day 4, showing, that untreated piglets with low Hb on day
`1 produced microcytic erythrocytes.
`A delay in the utilisation of iron in injected newborn
`piglets may mean that there is no advantage injecting iron-
`dextran very early after birth, since Vrigazov and Dilov
`(1976) could not detect labelled iron from iron-dextran in
`the erythrocytes of piglets until 24 hours after injection, and
`Braude et al (1962) found that orally-administered inorganic
`iron was available for haemoglobin synthesis more rapidly
`than iron from injected iron-dextran. The explanation for
`this could be that iron-dextran needs to undergo ‘reticulo-
`endothelial digestion’ before the iron is available for incor-
`poration into transferrin (Morgan and Finch 1966, Kornfeld
`et al 1969). Furugouri (1975) found that transport protein
`levels and iron-binding-capacity were very low in newborn
`piglets even when erythropoietic activity seemed to be high.
`Bollwahn et al (1972) found no difference between groups
`in Hb, RBC and packed cell volume on day 7 when piglets
`were injected on day 3 or immediately after birth. This was
`explained by immaturity of liver function in the first days of
`life. These findings are not in accordance with those in the
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1062, p. 4
`
`

`
`Iron-dextran supplementation in piglets
`
`183
`
`present study, in which piglets treated on day 1 were still
`ahead on day 7 compared with the piglets treated on day 3 or
`day 4 (Tables 1 and 2). In trial 1, the observed differences
`between groups with regard to Hb, MCV, MCH, RDW and HDW
`on day 4, showed that the production of haemoglobin and
`erythrocytes were both higher in the group injected with
`iron-dextran on day 1 than in the untreated group T1D4. In
`trial 2 on day 3, the piglets that had been injected with iron-
`dextran two days earlier had higher MCV, MCH and RDW, but
`lower HDW than the untreated piglets T2D3. Some of these
`piglets were only two-and-a-half-days old. The present
`study indicates that piglets are able to synthesise haemoglo-
`bin from day 1, and respond quickly to iron-dextran injec-
`tions. An explanation could be that the piglets in the present
`trial were heavier than those in most of the previously
`reported studies dealing with erythropoiesis in newborn
`piglets. Moreover, the piglets in Bollwahn’s study was
`delivered by caesarean section, which might have interfered
`with maturity development and affected haematological
`parameters in the piglets. Thorén-Tolling (1975) found that
`iron stores in the liver were proportional to birth weight.
`Large litter size coupled with high birth weight of the
`piglets, increases the demands for iron transfer from the sow
`to the foetuses. The higher erythropoietic activity found on
`day 3 in the present study in a two-and-half-day old piglet
`injected with iron-dextran two days earlier, than in an
`untreated piglet, indicate that the demand for additional iron
`supply and already arisen. This might also explain the rapid
`reaction after iron supplementation.
`From Tables 1 and 2, it can be seen that MCV increased
`from day 1 to day 7 and RDW from day 1 to day 4 in the
`piglets injected with iron-dextran on day 1. There was a sig-
`nificant negative correlation between Hb on day 1 and the
`increase in MCV from day 1 to day 4, in piglets given iron
`treatment on day 1 (Fig 1a). These findings strongly indicate
`a higher erythropoietic activity in the iron-treated piglets
`with the lowest Hb on day 1. The piglets with highest Hb did
`not respond as well to iron treatment. This also indicates that
`iron deficiency anaemia already existed in some piglets on
`day 1. Looking at Fig 1(a) and (d) the main changes in MCV
`seen in T1D4 between day 4 and 7 were the same as those
`seen between day 1 and 4 in T1D1. In orally iron-treated
`piglets, absorption of iron is regulated in relation to body
`iron stores and erythropoietic activity (Bothwell et al 1958).
`The injection of iron disturbs this regulation mechanism,
`and iron is available in excess. The results presented here
`indicate that intestinal absorption of iron is not the only
`important factor regulating haemoglobin production in new-
`born piglets. In older piglets, oxygen tension and Hb regulate
`erythropoietin production (Sjaastad et al 1992). Iron has
`been found not only to be a building block in haemoglobin
`production, but also a stimulus for erythropoietin synthesis
`in anaemic piglets (Sjaastad et al 1996). In iron-treated new-
`born piglets, erythropoietin was found to increase during the
`first day of life and then decrease over the next three days
`(Sjaastad et al 1992). In the present study, the reason why,
`the piglets with the lowest Hb on day 1, which also had
`access to iron (i.e. received iron treatment), showed the
`highest erythropoetic activity, might be that erythropoietin
`production was stimulated more markedly in these piglets.
`As shown in Table 1, the highest HDW value was found on
`day 1. This might be a reflection of the situation in the
`
`piglets before birth. While HDW decreased from day 1 in the
`piglets injected with iron-dextran at that time, it first
`decreased from day 3 or day 4 in the piglets injected on
`those respective days. HDW seemed to be a more sensitive
`parameter than MCHC in detecting erythropoietic activity in
`the first week after birth. Although MCHC decreased from
`day 1 to day 7, there was no difference between groups.
`Both MCV and RDW have previously been found to be sensi-
`tive indicators of active erythropoiesis in piglets (Holter et
`al 1991, Egeli and Framstad 1998a).
`On days 14 and 21, there were no differences between
`groups in RBC, Hb, MCV, MCH and MCHC. In trial 1, average
`Hb, RDW, and HDW within groups were the same on days 14
`and 21, but MCV, MCH and MCHC decreased from day 14 to
`day 21. About 40 mg iron needs to be absorbed per 1 kg
`weight gain if Hb is to be maintained at 100 g/litre–1. On this
`basis the amount of iron injected into the piglets in the pres-
`ent trial would have covered their iron requirements for
`about two weeks. This corresponds well with the blood val-
`ues found, which indicated a slowing down in production of
`haemoglobin from about day 14, presumably due to deple-
`tion of iron reserves.
`The changes in WBC and differential counts (Table 3)
`largely correspond with the development in white cell popu-
`lations described by Jain (1986) and Imlah and McTaggart
`(1977). The increase in lymphocytes and thereby WBC found
`on day 21 in the present study, seems, however, to have
`occurred earlier than previously described in the available lit-
`erature. The high neutrophil counts at birth can be explained
`by the high cortisone level at that time (Brenner and Gürtler
`1977). Some authors found elevated WBC and neutrophil
`counts in piglets in response to iron treatment compared with
`those in untreated piglets, or in piglets treated with smaller
`amounts of iron (Kay et al 1980, Furugouri et al 1983).
`Bacterial challenge together with access to iron could have
`caused the increase in WBC in the iron-treated piglets in the
`mentioned studies. Iron deficiency or access to iron might
`also interfere with WBC production. In humans and rats,
`myeloperoxidase activity and the ability of neutrophils to kill
`bacteria were found to be impaired in iron deficiency
`anaemia (Dallman 1986). The neutrophil count was found to
`decrease in anaemic piglets compared with iron-treated ani-
`mals (Gainer et al 1985). The results in the present study are
`confused by the significant difference found between group
`in WBC and neutrophiles on day 1. However, by day 7, the
`difference had diminished. The results indicate that access to
`iron from day 1 does not stimulate the production of leuko-
`cytes or neutrophiles compared with iron injection on day 4.
`The values for WBC found in the present study on day 4 were
`lower than those found in the iron-treated piglets in the study
`of Kay et al (1980) and Furugouri et al (1983).
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Some piglets already suffered from an iron deficiency
`anaemia on day 1 and responded quickly to subcutaneous
`iron-dextran injections. The piglets treated on day 1 were
`still ahead on day 7 compared with the piglets treated on day
`3 or 4. Differences between groups were beginning to
`develop on day 3, but were highest on day 7. The production
`of erythrocytes was highest after iron treatment in the
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1062, p. 5
`
`

`
`184
`
`A. K. Egeli, T. Framstad
`
`piglets with lowest haemoglobin concentrations levels ini-
`tially. The white cell count were not affected whether iron
`was injected on day 1, 3 or 4.
`
`REFERENCES
`ALTMAN, D. G. (1993) Principles of statistical analysis. In: Practical Statistics for
`Medical Research. Ed D. G. Altman. Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 180-228 and
`pp 277-324
`BOLLWAHN, W., VASKE, T., ROJAS, M. & WENZ, I. (1972) The haematopoiesis of
`newborn piglets and the effect of iron dextran (®Myofer). The blue book for the
`veterinary profession 22, 152-162
`BOTHWELL, T. H., PIRZIO-BIROLI, G. & FINCH, C. A. (1958) Iron absorption. I.
`Factors influencing absorption. Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine 51, 24-
`36
`BRAUDE, R., CHAMBERLAIN, A. G., KOTARBINSKA, M & MITCHELL, K. G.
`(1962) The metabolism of iron in piglets given labelled iron either orally or by
`injection. British Journal of Nutrition 16, 427-449
`BRENNER, K. V. & GÜRTLER, H. (1977) Die Konzentration an Kortisol, Glukose
`und freien Fettsäuren im Blutplasma bei Schweinen in Abhängigkeit vom Alter
`sowie bei Sauen im Zeitraum der Geburt. Archiv Für experimentelle Veterinar
`medizin. 31, 741-747
`DALLMAN, P. R. (1986) Biochemical basis for the manifestations of iron deficiency.
`Annual Review of Nutrition 6, 13-40
`DAVIES, D. T. & FISHER, G. V. (1991) The Validation and Application of the
`Technicon H*1 for the Complete Automated Evaluation of Laboratory Animal
`Hamatology. Comparative Haematology International 1, 91-105
`EGELI, A. K. & FRAMSTAD, T. (1998a) Evaluation of the efficacy of perorally
`administered glutamic acid-chelated iron and iron-dextran injected subcutaneously
`in Duroc and Norwegian Landrace piglets. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A45,
`53-61
`EGELI, A. K. & FRAMSTAD, T. (1998b) Effect of an oral starter dose of iron on
`haematology and weight gain in piglets having voluntary access to glutamic acid-
`chelated iron solution. Accepted in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.
`EGELI, A. K., FRAMSTAD, T. & GRØNNINGEN, D. (1998c) The effect of peroral
`administration of amino acid-chelated iron to pregnant sows in preventing sow and
`piglet anaemia. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 39, 77-87
`EGELI, A. K., FRAMSTAD, T., MORBERG, H. & TVERDAL, A. A. (1998d)
`Evaluation of the Technicon H*1 in piglets blood. Accepted in Veterinary Clinical
`Pathology.
`
`FRAMSTAD, T., SJAASTAD, Ø. V. & AASS, R. (1988) Blodprøvetaking på gris.
`Norsk Veterinœr Tidsskrift 100, 265-273
`FURUGOURI, K. (1975) Characteristic aspects of iron metabolism in piglets.
`Japanese Agricultural Research Quarterly 9, 171-176
`FURUGOURI, K., MIYATA, Y., SHIJIMAYA, K. & NARASAKI, N. (1983)
`Developmental changes in serum ferritin of piglets. Journal of Animal Science 57,
`(4) 960-965
`GAINER, J. H., GUARNIERI, J. & DAS, N. K. (1985) Neutropenia and anemia in the
`iron deficient baby pig. California Veterinarian 1, 18-41
`HOLMGREN, N. (1996) Polyarthritis in piglets caused by iron dextran. Proceedings
`of the 14th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, Bologna, Italy. 306
`HOLTER, P. H., FRAMSTAD, T., AULIE, A., REFSUM, H. E. & SJAASTAD, Ø. V.
`(1991) Effect of iron treatment on erythrocyte parameters in postnatal anemia of the
`pig. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology 8, 1-11
`IMLAH, P. & McTAGGART, H. S. (1977) Haematology of the pig. In: Comparative
`clinical haematology. Eds R. K. Archer and L. B. Jeffcott. Oxford, Blackwell scien-
`tific publications. pp 271-303
`JAIN, N. C. (1986) The pig: Normal hematology with comments on response to dis-
`ease. In: Schalm’s veterinary hematology. 4th edn. Ed N. C. Jain Philadelphia, Lea
`& Febiger. pp 240-255
`KAY, R. M., GLEED, P. T., PATTERSON, A. & SANSOM, B. F. (1980) Effects of
`low level dosing of iron on the haematology and growth rate of piglets. The
`Veterinary Record 17, 408-410
`KORNFELD, S., CHIPMAN, B. & BROWN, E. B. (1969) Intracellular catabolism of
`hemoglob in and iron dextranby the rat liver. The Journal of Laboratory and
`Clinical Medicine 73, (2) 181-193
`MORGAN, E. H. & FINCH, C. A. (1966) Iron and transferrin distribution and
`turnover in iron-overloaded rabbits. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental
`Biology and Medicine 122, 92-96
`SIMSON, E., ROSS, D. W. & KOCHER, W. D. (1988) Atlas of automated cytochem-
`ical hematology. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 88-50183, United
`States of America
`SJAASTAD, Ø. V., FRAMSTAD, T. & BLOM, A. K. (1992) Neonatal changes in plasma
`erythropoietin in fast growing pigs. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 33, 249-252
`SJAASTAD, Ø. V., FRAMSTAD, T. & BLOM, A. K. (1996) Effect of iron on erythro-
`poietin production in anaemic piglets. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 37, 133-138
`THORÉN-TOLLING, K. (1975) Studies on the absorption of iron after oral adminis-
`tration in piglets. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Supplement 54, 1-121
`VENN, J. A. J., McCANCE, R. A. & WIDDOWSON, E. M. (1947) Iron metabolism
`in piglet anaemia. Journal of Compa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket