throbber
Research
`
`Original Investigation
`Comparative Risk of Anaphylactic Reactions Associated
`With Intravenous Iron Products
`
`Cunlin Wang, MD, PhD; David J. Graham, MD, MPH; Robert C. Kane, MD; Diqiong Xie, PhD; Michael Wernecke, BA;
`Mark Levenson, PhD; Thomas E. MaCurdy, PhD; Monica Houstoun, PharmD; Qin Ryan, MD, PhD;
`Sarah Wong, MPH; Katrina Mott, MPH; Ting-Chang Sheu, MPH; Susan Limb, MD; Chris Worrall, BS;
`Jeffrey A. Kelman, MD, MSc; Marsha E. Reichman, PhD
`
`Supplemental content at
`jama.com
`
`IMPORTANCE All intravenous (IV) iron products are associated with anaphylaxis, but the
`comparative safety of each product has not been well established.
`
`OBJECTIVE To compare the risk of anaphylaxis among marketed IV iron products.
`
`DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective new user cohort study of IV iron
`recipients (n = 688 183) enrolled in the US fee-for-service Medicare program from January
`2003 to December 2013. Analyses involving ferumoxytol were limited to the period
`January 2010 to December 2013.
`
`EXPOSURES Administrations of IV iron dextran, gluconate, sucrose, or ferumoxytol as
`reported in outpatient Medicare claims data.
`
`MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Anaphylaxis was identified using a prespecified and
`validated algorithm defined with standard diagnosis and procedure codes and applied to
`both inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims. The absolute and relative risks of anaphylaxis
`were estimated, adjusting for imbalances among treatment groups.
`
`RESULTS A total of 274 anaphylaxis cases were identified at first exposure, with an additional
`170 incident anaphylaxis cases identified during subsequent IV iron administrations. The risk
`for anaphylaxis at first exposure was 68 per 100 000 persons for iron dextran (95% CI,
`57.8-78.7 per 100 000) and 24 per 100 000 persons for all nondextran IV iron products
`combined (iron sucrose, gluconate, and ferumoxytol) (95% CI, 20.0-29.5 per 100 000) , with
`an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.6 (95% CI, 2.0-3.3; P < .001). At first exposure, when
`compared with iron sucrose, the adjusted OR of anaphylaxis for iron dextran was 3.6 (95% CI,
`2.4-5.4); for iron gluconate, 2.0 (95% CI 1.2, 3.5); and for ferumoxytol, 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1-4.3).
`The estimated cumulative anaphylaxis risk following total iron repletion of 1000 mg
`administered within a 12-week period was highest with iron dextran (82 per 100 000
`persons, 95% CI, 70.5- 93.1) and lowest with iron sucrose (21 per 100 000 persons, 95% CI,
`15.3- 26.4).
`
`CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients in the US Medicare nondialysis population
`with first exposure to IV iron, the risk of anaphylaxis was highest for iron dextran and lowest
`for iron sucrose.
`
`JAMA. 2015;314(19):2062-2068. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15572
`
`2062
`
`
`
`Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`Author Affiliations: Author
`affiliations are listed at the end of this
`article.
`Corresponding Author: Cunlin
`Wang, MD, PhD, Division of
`Epidemiology I, Office of Surveillance
`and Epidemiology, Center for Drug
`Evaluation and Research,
`US Food and Drug Administration,
`10903 New Hampshire Ave,
`Silver Spring, MD 20903
`(cunlin.wang@fda.hhs.gov).
`
`(Reprinted)
`
`jama.com
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Stine Primdahl on 11/18/2015
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1055, p. 1
`
`

`
`Anaphylactic Reaction and Intravenous Iron Products
`
`Original Investigation Research
`
`I n 2010, anemia affected one third of the global popula-
`
`tion, and iron deficiency was the most common cause.1 A
`model using data throughout 2010 estimated that moder-
`ateirondeficiencyanemia(IDA)affectsapproximately610mil-
`lion people worldwide.2 Oral iron replacement is the primary
`treatment strategy for iron deficiency anemia but may be in-
`adequate for some patients due to intolerance, impaired ab-
`sorption, significant ongoing bleeding, or nonadherence.3 For
`these patients, intravenous (IV) iron may be indicated. Com-
`pared with oral iron, IV iron can significantly increase levels
`of hemoglobin, serum ferritin, and transferrin saturation.4 As
`of June 2013, there were 5 IV iron products marketed in the
`United States. While their efficacy is established, the most im-
`portant safety concern relates to the risk of serious and fatal
`anaphylaxis,5-8 which may occur at both first and subsequent
`exposures.
`No sufficiently large randomized trials have been con-
`ducted to determine the comparative risk of anaphylaxis for
`IV iron products. Based on a meta-analysis of published stud-
`ies of iron dextran, the estimated incidence of anaphylaxis was
`0.61%.9 Although the newer IV iron products are purportedly
`safer,10,11 anaphylactic reactions also occur with these
`products.8,12 In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial involv-
`ing more than 2500 patients treated with iron gluconate, the
`incidence of life-threatening reactions was 0.04%.9 In an-
`other trial of 750 patients treated with ferumoxytol, 1 patient
`developed anaphylaxis.13
`To our knowledge, there have been no large population-
`based observational studies that evaluate the risk of anaphy-
`laxis among different IV iron products. Such a study is impor-
`tant because large head-to-head comparative safety trials to
`detect rare adverse reactions like anaphylaxis may not be fea-
`sible. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of ana-
`phylaxis among patients receiving different IV iron products
`in a large, nondialysis, US Medicare patient population.
`
`Methods
`Study Population
`This study used a retrospective new user cohort design. Pa-
`tients enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare Part A (hospitaliza-
`tion) and Part B (office-based care) between January 2003 and
`December 2013 entered the IV iron new user cohort on the date
`of their first outpatient claim with a Healthcare Common Pro-
`cedure Coding System (HCPCS) code for an IV iron product
`(index date). Patients were included in the study if on their in-
`dex date they were not receiving dialysis, were continuously
`enrolled in Medicare A and B for the previous 12 months, had
`no IV iron exposure in the preceding 12 months, and were ex-
`posed to only 1 type of IV iron product. Also, patients who had
`a claim for a blood transfusion on the index date or a diagno-
`sis of anaphylaxis in the 30 days before the index date were
`excluded. Since ferumoxytol received US Food and Drug Ad-
`ministration (FDA) approval in mid-2009, analyses involving
`this agent were limited to the period from January 2010 to end
`of study (December 2013). This study was approved by the Re-
`search Involving Human Subjects Committee of the FDA prior
`
`to initiation. Patient consent was waived because the study
`used deidentified health care claims data.
`
`Exposure of Interest
`The primary comparison of interest was the use of dextran vs
`nondextran IV iron products. A secondary analysis compared
`anaphylaxis risk between iron dextran and 3 approved non-
`dextran products individually (iron gluconate, iron sucrose,
`and ferumoxytol). Although it was not possible to distin-
`guish between the 2 FDA-approved iron dextrans (high-
`molecular-weight dextran, low-molecular-weight dextran)
`based on claims data during most of the study interval be-
`causetheysharedthesameHCPCScode,allirondextranclaims
`were combined into 1 group.
`
`Outcome Definition and Identification
`Cases of anaphylaxis were identified using a predefined, vali-
`dated algorithm, based on International Classification of
`Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis/
`procedureandHCPCScodesforinpatientandoutpatientclaims,
`whichwasdevelopedusingtheNationalInstituteofAllergyand
`Infectious Diseases and Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Net-
`work (NIAID/FAAN) criteria.14,15 The algorithm had a positive
`predictive value (PPV) of 63% for anaphylaxis, and 76% for the
`composite outcome of anaphylaxis or serious allergic reaction,
`the latter of which was defined as an allergic reaction that is
`highly likely to evolve into anaphylaxis if untreated. False-
`positiveeventsidentifiedasanaphylaxisbythisalgorithminthe
`validationstudyincludedmildallergicreactions,isolatedhives,
`rash,andrespiratorydistress.14Thisalgorithmwasusedtoiden-
`tify anaphylaxis cases when multiple procedure and diagnosis
`codes were present (eAppendix 1 in the Supplement). Because
`IViron-associatedanaphylaxiscasesreportedfromclinicaltrials
`andspontaneousadverseeventsindicatethatanaphylaxisgen-
`erally occurs within a few hours of IV iron administration,8,12
`anaphylaxis cases in this study were limited, for the primary
`analysis, to only those captured on the same date as the IV iron
`administration, which may plausibly increase the positive pre-
`dictive value of the algorithm.
`
`Cohort Follow-up and Censoring
`In addition to the analysis of anaphylaxis at the first admin-
`istration, patients were also followed up to identify the risks
`of anaphylaxis at subsequent administrations. Follow-up be-
`gan on index date. Censoring occurred for disenrollment from
`Medicare Part A or B, switching to another IV iron product, di-
`alysis initiation, occurrence of an anaphylaxis event, death, or
`end of study (December 31, 2013), whichever occurred first.
`
`Covariates
`In addition to age and sex, data on the following potential con-
`founders were collected from Medicare claims during the 12-
`month period preceding the index date: history of food aller-
`gies, history of drug allergy, asthma, chronic obstructive
`pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, hypertension, and
`indications for IV iron use (eAppendixes 2 and 3 in the Supple-
`ment). In the sensitivity analysis that included patients with
`Medicare part D (prescription drug) coverage, concomitant use
`
`jama.com
`
`(Reprinted) JAMA November 17, 2015 Volume 314, Number 19
`
`2063
`
`
`
`Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Stine Primdahl on 11/18/2015
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1055, p. 2
`
`

`
`Research Original Investigation
`
`Anaphylactic Reaction and Intravenous Iron Products
`
`Figure 1. Trend of First-Time Use by IV Iron Product
`
`Iron dextran (n = 247 500)
`Iron gluconate (n = 94 400)
`Iron sucrose (n = 264 166)
`Ferumoxytol (n = 82 117)
`
`3500
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`Count of First-time Users
`
`0
`Jan
`Jul
`Jan
`Jan
`Jul
`Jan
`Jan
`Jan
`Jan
`Jan
`Jul
`Jan
`Jan
`Jul
`Jul
`Jul
`Jan
`Jul
`Jul
`Jul
`Jul
`Jul
`2013
`2012
`2011
`2010
`2008
`2009
`2006
`2005
`2004
`2003
`2007
`Year
`
`IV indicates intravenous.
`
`ofantibiotics,β-blockers,nonsteroidalanti-inflammatorydrugs
`(NSAIDs), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was
`also included.16,17
`
`Statistical Analysis
`The risk of anaphylaxis and corresponding 95% CIs was cal-
`culated for each IV iron product and for the combined non-
`dextran products.18 Imbalances in baseline characteristics be-
`tween treatment groups were assessed using standardized
`mean differences (SMDs). Multivariable logistic regression was
`used to estimate the risk of anaphylaxis at first administra-
`tionafteradjustingforimbalancedcovariates.TheTukeyrange
`test was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.19 The 95%
`CIs of the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were estimated based on
`likelihood ratio tests. The combined nondextran group was
`used as the reference group when compared with iron dex-
`tran. Iron sucrose was used as the reference group for com-
`parisons involving individual IV iron products. Because IV iron
`products differ by iron dose per administration, the cumula-
`tive risk of anaphylaxis was analyzed based on a clinically rel-
`evant repletion level of iron (1000 mg) achieved within 12-
`weeks per recommended dose and schedule. First, the number
`of exposures necessary to achieve an iron repletion of 1000
`mg were obtained by calculating the average number of ad-
`ministrations required for each IV iron product (eTable 1 in the
`Supplement). Under the assumption that the first administra-
`tion carried a higher risk of anaphylaxis than subsequent ad-
`ministrations, logistic regression was used to model risk at the
`first administration. Poisson regression was used to model risk
`of subsequent administrations. The risk of anaphylaxis with
`95% CIs for each treatment regimen was calculated by multi-
`plying the observed number of exposures needed to receive
`1000 mg of iron with the risk of anaphylaxis at each admin-
`istration.
`Prespecified sensitivity analyses examined the robust-
`ness of the results to variations in the outcome definition, in-
`cluding (1) anaphylaxis cases diagnosed up to 2 days after IV
`iron administration, (2) anaphylaxis or death occurring on the
`
`same day as IV iron administration, (3) cases only meeting ana-
`phylaxis criteria A and B as defined in eAppendix 1 in the
`Supplement, and (4) restricting the population to patients with
`Medicare Part D information to account for potential imbal-
`ance on relevant concomitant medications. Furthermore, fol-
`lowing the approval of ferumoxytol, a generic code J3490 (un-
`classified drugs) was used temporarily for reimbursement
`before a specific HCPCS code was assigned. We also con-
`ducted sensitivity analysis that removed ferumoxytol users
`who had a J3490 code during the period of July 2009 through
`December 2009. P < .05 was considered the threshold for sta-
`tistical significance. All tests were 2-sided. All analyses were
`performed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc) and R 3.0.2
`(R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
`
`Results
`Therewere247 500irondextranand440 683nondextrannew
`IV iron users during the study period. New iron dextran use
`decreased slightly over time, while nondextran use in-
`creased, particularly for iron sucrose. Ferumoxytol use be-
`gan following its 2009 marketing approval (Figure 1). At base-
`line, patients receiving dextran or nondextran IV irons were
`comparable with age, sex, race, and relevant health condi-
`tions except for coronary heart disease and hypertension
`(Table 1). The products differed with respect to the underly-
`ing conditions leading to IV iron administration, reflecting dif-
`ferences in FDA-approved indications for use (iron dextran is
`approved for use in broad iron deficiency anemia indications
`and nondextran products are approved only for use in pa-
`tientswithchronickidneydisease).Amongtheindividualnon-
`dextran products, baseline demographics and anaphylaxis-
`related characteristics were similar, except for the ferumoxytol
`cohort, which had the highest proportion of patients with
`chronic kidney disease (60%) and lowest proportion of pa-
`tients with gastrointestinal tract and genitourinary tract bleed-
`ing (12%) (eTable 2 in the Supplement).
`
`2064
`
`JAMA November 17, 2015 Volume 314, Number 19 (Reprinted)
`
`jama.com
`
`
`
`Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Stine Primdahl on 11/18/2015
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1055, p. 3
`
`

`
`Anaphylactic Reaction and Intravenous Iron Products
`
`Original Investigation Research
`
`Table 1. Baseline Characteristics for Incident Users Receiving Iron Dextran and Nondextran Intravenous Iron
`(2003-2013)
`
`No. (%) of Patients
`Iron Dextran
`(n = 247 500)
`
`Nondextran Intravenous Iron
`(n = 440 683)
`
`Standardized Mean
`Difference
`
`73.2 (11.3)
`
`83 312 (33.7)
`164 188 (66.3)
`
`74.0 (11.4)
`
`167 097 (37.9)
`273 586 (62.1)
`
`374 436 (85.0)
`48 449 (11.0)
`4222 (1.0)
`6926 (1.6)
`6650 (1.5)
`
`86 661 (19.7)
`119 670 (27.2)
`169 783 (38.5)
`63 529 (14.4)
`1040 (0.2)
`
`233 229 (52.9)
`63 956 (14.5)
`143 498 (32.6)
`
`60 044 (13.6)
`132 620 (30.1)
`207 127 (47.0)
`77 570 (17.6)
`33 355 (7.6)
`1968 (0.4)
`394 991 (89.6)
`
`211 132
`
`10 404 (4.9)
`5420 (2.6)
`86 856 (41.1)
`52 376 (24.8)
`
`0.07
`
`0.09
`0.09
`
`0.05
`0.05
`0.03
`0.01
`0.03
`
`0.26
`0.16
`0.33
`0.01
`0.00
`
`0.69
`0.19
`0.50
`
`0.01
`0.02
`0.12
`0.02
`0.04
`0.01
`0.20
`
`0.09
`0.02
`0.17
`0.00
`
`Abbreviations: ACE,
`angiotensin-converting enzyme;
`CKD, chronic kidney disease;
`COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary
`disease; GI/GU, gastrointestinal tract
`and genitourinary tract;
`NSAIDs, nonsteroidal
`anti-inflammatory drugs.
`a Data on concomitant medications
`were collected for those patients
`who were enrolled in Medicare
`Part D (prescription drugs)
`in 2007-2013.
`
`Baseline Characteristicsa
`Age, mean (SD), y
`Sex
`Men
`Women
`Race
`White
`Black
`Asian
`Hispanic
`Other/unknown
`Regions
`Northeast
`Midwest
`South
`West
`Other
`Indications
`Anemia
`CKD
`GI/GU bleeding
`Other
`Conditions
`33 179 (13.4)
`Asthma
`72 391 (29.2)
`COPD
`101 419 (41.0)
`Coronary heart disease
`41 481 (16.8)
`Depression
`16 151 (6.5)
`Drug allergy
`958 (0.4)
`Food allergy
`204 701 (82.7)
`Hypertension
`Beneficiaries With Part D Enrollmenta
`No. of patients
`83 627
`Concomitant medications
`NSAIDs
`Antibiotics
`β-Blockers
`ACE inhibitors
`
`214 962 (86.9)
`23 683 (9.6)
`1718 (0.7)
`4231 (1.7)
`2906 (1.2)
`
`25 935 (10.5)
`50 782 (20.5)
`135 108 (54.6)
`35 106 (14.2)
`569 (0.2)
`
`53 141 (21.5)
`53 681 (21.7)
`140 678 (56.8)
`
`5977 (7.1)
`1916 (2.3)
`27 616 (33.0)
`20 692 (24.7)
`
`There were 274 anaphylaxis cases identified at first expo-
`sure to an IV iron product. The risk for anaphylaxis was 68 per
`100 000 persons (95%CI, 57.8-78.7/ per 100 000) in the iron
`dextran group compared with 24 per 100 000 persons (95%
`CI, 20.0-29.5 per 100 000) in the nondextran IV iron group.
`The OR was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.0-3.3 P < .001), after adjustments
`for age, indication, history of coronary heart disease, and hy-
`pertension.Comparedwithironsucrose,bothirondextranand
`iron gluconate were associated with an increased risk of ana-
`phylaxis (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.4-5.4 and OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-
`3.5, respectively). Using data from 2010 to 2013, ferumoxytol
`was also associated with a higher risk of anaphylaxis com-
`pared with sucrose (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3; Table 2). Results
`
`of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main results
`(eTables 3-6 and eFigures 1-4 in the Supplement). We found
`less than 1% (548 of 82 117) ferumoxytol users had the ge-
`neric J3490 code during the June 2009-December 2009 pe-
`riod. Removing these patients had little change to the results
`(eTable 7 and eFigure 5 in the Supplement).
`Anadditional170anaphylaxiseventswereobservedatsub-
`sequent IV iron administrations. For all IV iron products, the
`rate of anaphylaxis was highest at the first administration and
`decreased thereafter. The decrease was particularly pro-
`nounced for iron gluconate and iron sucrose (Figure 2). The
`cumulative risk of anaphylaxis over multiple administrations
`was highest for iron dextran, followed in decreasing order by
`
`jama.com
`
`(Reprinted) JAMA November 17, 2015 Volume 314, Number 19
`
`2065
`
`
`
`Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Stine Primdahl on 11/18/2015
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1055, p. 4
`
`

`
`Research Original Investigation
`
`Anaphylactic Reaction and Intravenous Iron Products
`
`ferumoxytol, iron gluconate, and iron sucrose (eFigure 6 in the
`Supplement). To reach an aggregate iron dose of 1000 mg in
`the cumulative dose analysis, dextran and ferumoxytol users
`required 2 administrations on average, whereas sucrose us-
`ers needed 5 and iron gluconate users needed 7. For cumula-
`tive doses of 1000-mg iron administered, as estimated from
`modeling, iron dextran was also associated with the highest
`risk of anaphylaxis (82 per 100 000 persons, 95% CI, 70.5- 93.1
`per 100 000), whereas iron sucrose was associated with the
`lowest risk (21 per 100 000 persons, 95% CI, 15.3- 26.4 per
`100 000) (Figure 3).
`The 2 marketed iron dextran products (high-molecular-
`weightdextran,low-molecular-weightdextran)sharedthesame
`HCPCS code during most of the study period. Thus, the indi-
`vidual risk of each iron dextran product could not be fully stud-
`ied.However,duringabriefintervalfromJanuary2006toMarch
`2008, separate HCPCS codes were used for each dextran prod-
`uct.Duringthisperiod,of53 914newirondextranusers,48 772
`(90.5%)receivedlow-molecular-weightdextranand5142(9.5%)
`received high-molecular-weight dextran, suggesting that dur-
`ing the study period, most dextran use in this population was
`low-molecularweight.Amongfirstadministrationsofirondex-
`tran during this period, a total of 43 anaphylaxis events were
`observed, of which 40 (93%) were in those taking low-
`molecular-weight dextran (eTable 8 in the Supplement).
`
`Discussion
`Among more than 680 000 US Medicare nondialysis benefi-
`ciaries who initiated IV iron use from 2003 to 2013, iron dex-
`tran was associated with increased anaphylaxis risk com-
`pared with nondextran formulations at first administration.
`Amongthenondextranproducts,theriskofanaphylaxisatfirst
`administration was higher with both iron gluconate and feru-
`moxytol than with iron sucrose. Because each IV iron prod-
`uct has a specific recommended dose and schedule of admin-
`istration,thecumulativeriskofanaphylaxiswasalsocalculated
`based on both the number of administrations and clinically rel-
`evant repletion level of iron (1000 mg) achieved within 12
`weeks. Both analyses showed iron dextran was associated with
`the highest cumulative risk of anaphylaxis and iron sucrose
`with the lowest risk.
`AllIVironformulationsstudiedconsistofanelementaliron
`core surrounded by a carbohydrate shell intended to shield the
`iron core and facilitate iron delivery to the reticuloendothe-
`lial system following intravenous administration. The formu-
`lations differ from each other in the size of the iron core and
`the identity and density of the carbohydrate shell.20 Al-
`though iron dextran is asserted to have a greater risk of seri-
`ous adverse events than the more recently approved nondex-
`tran IV iron products, most of the clinical trials that supported
`the approval of nondextran IV irons used a placebo or oral iron
`comparator and not iron dextran. Only a few head-to-head
`trials prospectively compared IV iron formulations, and they
`were small in sample size, had few or no anaphylaxis events,
`and were not designed to establish comparative safety.9,21,22
`To our knowledge, the present study represents the largest
`
`bPvalueadjustedformultiplecomparisons.
`aAdjustedforage,indication,coronaryheartdisease,andhypertension.
`Abbreviation:AOR,adjustedoddsratio.
`
`.001
`(1.4-6.5)
`3.0
`
`<.001
`(3.0-9.8)
`5.4
`
`(27.8-78.2)
`47.0
`
`(66.0-108.4)
`84.7
`
`34029
`
`77935
`
`.02
`(1.1-4.3)
`2.2
`
`(23.1-50.0)
`34.1
`
`82117
`
`Reference]
`
`1[
`
`(9.9-24.3)
`15.6
`
`134836
`
`.005
`(1.2-3.5)
`2.0
`
`<.001
`(2.4-5.4)
`3.6
`
`Reference]
`
`1[
`
`<.001
`(2.0-3.3)
`2.6
`
`(25.3-50.9)
`36.0
`
`(57.8-78.7)
`67.5
`
`(12.6-23.0)
`17.0
`
`(57.8-78.7)
`67.5
`
`94400
`
`247500
`
`264166
`
`247500
`
`16
`
`66
`
`28
`
`21
`
`34
`
`167
`
`45
`
`167
`
`IronGluconate
`
`IronDextran
`
`Ferumoxytol
`
`IronSucrose
`
`IronGluconate
`
`IronDextran
`
`IronSucrose
`
`IronDextran
`
`2010-2013
`
`2003-2013
`
`Reference]
`
`1[
`
`(20.0-29.5)
`24.3
`
`440683
`
`107
`
`Nondextran
`
`2003-2013
`
`Pvalueb
`
`AOR(95%CI)a
`(95%CI)
`per100000persons
`Rate
`
`No.ofnewusers
`anaphylaxiscases
`No.of
`IntravenousIron
`
`Table2.RiskofAnaphylaxisatFirstAdministrationbyIntravenousIronProducts
`
`2066
`
`JAMA November 17, 2015 Volume 314, Number 19 (Reprinted)
`
`jama.com
`
`
`
`Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Stine Primdahl on 11/18/2015
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1055, p. 5
`
`

`
`Anaphylactic Reaction and Intravenous Iron Products
`
`Original Investigation Research
`
`Figure 2. Rate of Anaphylaxis by IV Iron Products and Number
`of Administrations
`
`No. of times
`administered
`
`1 2
`
`3 4
`
`-5
`≥6
`
`
`
`Iron DextranIron Dextran
`
`Ferumoxytol
`
`Iron Gluconate
`
`Iron Sucrose
`
`No. of users
`247 500
`126 678
`90 874
`129 799
`495 851
`
`No. of users
`82 117
`48 359
`12 244
`13 173
`8778
`
`No. of users
`94 400
`72 464
`64 834
`105 438
`312 971
`
`No. of users
`264 166
`196 201
`169 788
`251 284
`550 444
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`Rate of Anaphylaxis per 100 000 Administrations
`
`No. of times
`administered
`
`1234
`
`-5
`≥6
`
`IV indicates intravenous.
`
`Figure 3. Adjusted Predicted Risk of Anaphylaxis at Cumulative Dose
`of 1000 mg
`
`Iron
`Dextran
`
`Ferumoxytol
`
`Iron
`Gluconate
`
`Iron
`Sucrose
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Predicted Risk of Anaphylaxis
`
`per 100 000 Persons
`
`Adjusted for age, coronary heart disease, and hypertension. Error bars indicate
`95% CIs.
`
`ting, physicians may code severe or textbook anaphylaxis as
`anaphylaxis but code less severe or atypical anaphylaxis in
`terms of its component symptoms or as an allergic reaction.
`Compared with anaphylaxis criteria used in the adjudication
`of clinical trial data, our algorithm might have missed the cases
`presenting with skin and mucosal symptoms that could have
`been treated with corticosteroids, which may be milder in na-
`ture than cases presenting with systemic symptoms (such as
`respiratory compromise, syncope). The skin and mucosal
`symptoms were not included in our algorithm because they
`are not specific to anaphylaxis, so including them would nega-
`tively affect the positive predictive value. While balancing be-
`tween positive predictive value and sensitivity, our algo-
`rithm should have captured the typical and severe anaphylaxis
`cases diagnosed by the physician. The validity of our analy-
`ses should not be biased by the under ascertainment of ana-
`phylaxis cases since it seems unlikely that physician coding
`practices for completing Medicare billing claims would differ
`
`comparative safety assessment of anaphylaxis risk for the IV
`iron products. In contrast to prior efforts to assess safety,23-25
`our study was not based on postmarket passive case report-
`ing, such as the FDA’s spontaneous adverse events reporting
`system, which is limited in its ability to support comparative
`safety analyses due to different approval dates and indica-
`tion of IV iron products, variations in reporting over time,
`choice of denominator used, and variations in the diagnostic
`criteria of anaphylaxis. Our study provides a more reliable es-
`timate of the relative risk between individual IV iron prod-
`ucts based on a prespecified algorithm for anaphylaxis, a well-
`defined and characterized population at risk, and adjustment
`for imbalances in baseline risk factors for anaphylaxis.
`The mechanism of anaphylactic reaction after IV iron re-
`mains unknown. Dextran may be immunogenic, even to pa-
`tientswhohavenotbeenpreviouslyexposed,becauseofcross-
`reactivity of dextran to native polysaccharide antibodies.21 The
`mechanism of anaphylaxis associated with nondextran IV iron
`is also unclear. Possibilities include reactions to the carbohy-
`drate shell or to release of unbound iron into the circulation
`that then may cause oxidative stress, hypotension, and car-
`diac failure in addition to the typical anaphylactic reaction. A
`recent review of ferumoxytol suggested that the structure of
`carbohydrate coating surrounding the iron oxide core also may
`be associated with immunogenicity.26 The possible adverse ef-
`fects of more rapid administration of higher doses of IV iron
`are also not well characterized.
`This study has several limitations. The study population
`consisted of US Medicare beneficiaries not receiving dialysis
`treatment; thus, our results may not extend to dialysis pa-
`tients or younger age populations. Patients receiving dialysis
`were not included because iron dextran and ferumoxytol were
`rarely used in this population. Another limitation was that the
`low- and high-molecular-weight dextran products could not be
`individually identified during most of study period. However,
`the very low use of high-molecular-weight iron dextran from
`January2006throughMarch2008,duringwhichwecoulddis-
`tinguish the use of 2 dextran products, suggests that our re-
`sults likely represent the risk of the low-molecular-weight dex-
`tran, especially the most recent data from 2010-2013.
`Based on the incidence rates observed in clinical trials of
`ferumoxytol, in which the rate of anaphylaxis or serious hy-
`persensitivity reaction varied between 0.2% and 0.9%, de-
`pending on the patient population,27 our results may indi-
`cate low sensitivity (8%-35%) in detecting anaphylaxis. One
`possible explanation is that the patient populations included
`in the randomized clinical trials and our large observational
`study were different. The ferumoxytol trial that reported an
`anaphylaxis incidence of 0.9% was conducted in a general
`population of patients with iron deficiency anemia to sup-
`port an unapproved indication (Miya Paterniti, MD, US FDA,
`written communication, July 10, 2015), whereas the majority
`of patients in our study had anemia related to chronic kidney
`disease per approved indication, and the baseline risk of ana-
`phylaxis may have been different in these 2 populations. Also,
`anaphylaxis can present in a variety of ways with varying de-
`grees of severity. In clinical trials, there is generally a well-
`defined case definition, whereas in the general practice set-
`
`jama.com
`
`(Reprinted) JAMA November 17, 2015 Volume 314, Number 19
`
`2067
`
`
`
`Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
`
`Downloaded From: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by Stine Primdahl on 11/18/2015
`
`Pharmacosmos, Exh. 1055, p. 6
`
`

`
`Research Original Investigation
`
`Anaphylactic Reaction and Intravenous Iron Products
`
`depending on which IV iron product was used. Although ran-
`dom variation in the sensitivity could create a spurious dif-
`ference between products, especially at very low levels of sen-
`sitivity, this is unlikely to have affected this study because the
`relative risks between individual IV iron products were all
`greater than 2, and greater than 5 in the comparison between
`iron dextran and sucrose.
`Inaddition,giventhedifferenceinindicationbetweeniron
`dextran and nondextran products, patients treated with dex-
`tran and nondextran IV iron may be different relative to the
`risk of anaphylaxis. We examined important baseline charac-
`
`teristics that are relevant to the risk of anaphylaxis and ad-
`justed for those that were not balanced in the final analysis.
`However, residual confounding is possible due to additional
`factors not captured by this study.
`
`Conclusions
`AmongpatientsintheUSMedicarenondialysispopulationwith
`first exposure to IV iron, the risk of anaphylaxis was highest
`for iron dextran and lowest for iron sucrose.
`
`ARTICLE INFORMATION
`Author Contributions: Dr MaCurdy had full access
`to all of the data in the study and takes
`responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
`accuracy of the data analysis.
`Study concept and design: All authors.
`Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All
`authors.
`Author Affiliations: Office of Surveillance and
`Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and
`Research, US Food and Drug Administration,
`Silver Spring, Maryland (Wang, Graham, Mott,
`Reichman); Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug
`Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug
`Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland (Kane,
`Houstoun, Ryan, Limb); Dr Kane is now retired.
`(Kane); Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug
`Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug
`Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland (Xie,
`Levenson); Acumen LLC, Burlingame, California
`(Wernecke, MaCurdy, Wong, Sheu); Harvard School
`of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Mott);
`Genentech Inc, San Francisco, California (Limb);
`Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
`Washington, DC (Worrall, Kelman).
`Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have
`completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for
`Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. The
`authors are employees or contractors of the
`Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services or the US
`Food and Drug Administration. No other disclosures
`were reported.
`Funding/Support: This study was funded through
`an intraagency agreement between the Centers for
`Medicare & Medicaid Services and the US Food and
`Drug Administration.
`Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The Centers for
`Medicare & Medicaid Services and the US Food and
`Drug Administration had no role in the design and
`conduct of the study; the collection, analysis, and
`interpretation of the data; the preparation of the
`manuscript; or the decision to submit the
`manuscript for publication.
`Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the
`authors and not necessarily those of the
`Department of Health and Human Services, the
`Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or the US
`Food and Drug Administration.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Kassebaum NJ, Jasrasaria R, Naghavi M, et al.
`A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from
`1990 to 2010. Blood. 2014;123(5):615-624.
`2. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived
`with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289
`
`diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic
`analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study
`2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163-2196.
`3. Silverstein SB, Rodgers GM. Parenteral iron
`therapy options. Am

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket