throbber
JULY 29, 1961
`
`NEW INTRAMUSCULAR HAEMATINIC
`
`BRMSH
`MEDICAL JOURNAL
`
`275
`
`transferrin.
`About 30% of the dose of iron given is
`excreted with the urine (Fig. 1) (Lindvall and Andersson,
`1961).
`It has no antigenic properties; LD50 for the
`mice is about 35 mg./kg. body weight (Svard, 1961).
`This value may seem low in comparison with other
`parenteral iron preparations, but the margin between the
`clinical dose of about 1.5 mg./kg. and a toxic one is
`nevertheless fully adequate.
`Administration.-The preparations here called iron-
`sorbitol and iron-dextran respectively were injected
`deeply into the gluteal region in a dose corresponding
`to 100 mg. Fe. The injections were made daily, on
`alternate sides.
`Every course of treatment comprised
`10 injections.
`Before the clinical trials started, the
`tolerance for iron-sorbitol was tested by giving
`10
`subjects increasing amounts of this preparation.
`As
`no side-effects were observed in these experiments the
`full therapeutic dose was given without a preceding
`test dose.
`
`Material
`The series comprised 65 patients who satisfied the
`clinical criteria for stabilized iron deficiency.
`In the
`order in which the patients came in for treatment, every
`second case was selected for iron-dextran treatment
`while the others were given iron-sorbitol. Twelve cases
`in the iron-dextran group and 21 in the iron-sorbitol
`group received the treatment in the out-patient depart-
`ment and the others were treated in hospital.
`The sex-and-age distribution in the groups is shown
`in Table I. As may be seen, the groups were equivalent
`in these respects, and women were in the majority.
`Table II presents the distribution of the material with
`respect to the diagnosis. As the material included cases
`
`U.[B.C. and
`n serum
`
`n serum
`
`C
`0-5-
`-1004#
`
`X _0
`1- o.2 0a..-
`
`a 0
`
`Renal
`excretion
`U BC>.
`
`CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON A
`NEW INTRAMUSCULAR HAEMATINIC
`BY
`NILS S. E. ANDERSSON, M.D.
`From the Medical Department, Centrallasarettet, Danderyd,
`Sweden
`
`According to Brown and Moore (1956) there are three
`clear indications for parenteral iron therapy: (1) hypo-
`patients unable to
`tolerate or
`chromic anaemia in
`unwilling to take adequate doses of iron orally; (2)
`hypochromic anaemia in patients unable to absorb
`adequate amounts of orally administered iron; and (3)
`patients who need their
`hypochromic anaemia in
`haemoglobin
`bringing
`rapidly
`to normal but
`for
`whom transfusions are undesirable or unsuitable.
`After the appearance of saccharated oxide of iron
`(Nissim, 1947) and a preparation containing a special
`ferridextrin complex in colloidal form (Agner et al.,
`1948; Andersson, 1950) the intravenous method of
`therapy was that most commonly used; of the two
`preparations,
`the latter can also be injected
`intra-
`muscularly (Andersson and Bergstrom, 1956).
`The intramuscular method of administration has,
`however, been increasingly applied since Fletcher and
`London (1954) produced their iron-dextran complex;
`this preparation, whose clinical properties, after intra-
`muscular injection, were studied by Baird and Podmore
`(1954) and others, has been found to give very good
`therapeutic results.
`Certain side-effects after the use
`of solutions containing this complex have, however, been
`reported (Karlefors and Norddn, 1958;
`and others).
`It has also been found that,
`when given to laboratory animals in high
`total amount for a prolonged period of
`time, the iron-dextran complex produces
`sarcoma at the site of injection (Rich-
`mond, 1959, 1960; Haddow and Horning,
`1960).
`A new iron preparation, " jectofer,"
`intended for intramuscular injection, has
`recently been presented by Lindvall and
`Andersson (1961).
`The present paper
`describes clinical
`studies on its thera-
`peutic effect and on the side-effects it
`produces.
`The previously
`mentioned
`iron-dextran preparation, " imferon," was
`used for purposes of comparison.
`
`600
`
`500
`
`d
`
`E 0
`
`1
`
`0E
`
`.a
`a 0
`
`0I
`:Li
`
`Properties of Jectofer
`The iron in this preparation is present
`in the form of a sterile solution of an
`iron-sorbitol-citric-acid
`complex
`with
`dextrin as a stabilizer. The solution con-
`tains 50 mg. Fe/ml. and has a pH of 7.5.
`It is stable in serum; it does not cause
`haemolysis
`affect
`and does
`the
`not
`clotting mechanism.
`Absorption after
`intramuscular
`injection
`takes
`place
`rapidly-two-thirds of a dose injected
`into a rabbit is absorbed within three
`hours and 80-85%
`after
`hours.
`12
`Absorption is followed by a rapid rise in
`the iron concentration of serum. A small
`part of the preparation is bound to the
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`6
`5
`Hours after injection
`iron-binding
`capacity
`in serum, unsaturated
`FIG. 1.-Iron concentration
`(U.I.B.C.), sum of iron concentration in serum and unsaturated iron-binding
`capacity (five healthy subjects, whose level of total iron-binding capacity-
`T.I.B.C.-is shown), and renal excretion (nine healthy subjects). Mean values
`after intramuscular injections of a dose of 100 mg. Fe.
`
`7
`
`8
`8
`
`9
`9
`
`1
`10
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2044, P. 1
`
`

`
`276
`
`JULY 29, 1961
`
`NEW INTRAMUSCULAR HAEMATINIC
`
`BRInISH
`MEDICAL JOURNAL
`for both preparations most pronounced in the patients
`showing the lowest initial values for the haemoglobin
`content (Table IV).
`For the group with an initial value of HbS,8 g./100
`ml. blood the Hb increase is given for every case in
`Table V.
`The group treated with iron-sorbitol con-
`sisted of six women and one man; three of the women
`had their menstruation during the observation period.
`The iron-dextran group comprised three women and
`four men; one of the women in this group had her
`menstruation during the observation period. The Hb
`value 7, 14, 21, and 35 days after inception of treatment
`is shown and it is seen that the increase ran parallel in
`both groups; after five weeks it was 3.8 g. /100 ml.
`blood in the iron-sorbitol group and 3.9 g./100 ml. in
`the iron-dextran group.
`The mean serum-iron value
`before treatment was 17 ,ug. /100 ml. blood for the iron-
`sorbitol group and 23 pg./100 ml. for those given iron-
`dextran; after treatment the values were 21 and 37
`jug. /100 ml. blood, respectively.
`Table VI presents the results of treatment of patients
`with a pretreatment Hb level of 8.1-12 g./100 ml. and of
`> 12.1 g./lO0 ml. blood.
`There was no difference in
`TABLE IV.-Maximum Reticulocyte Response per 1,000. Number
`of Cases in Parentheses
`
`Preparation
`
`Iron-sorbitol
`Iron-dextran
`
`..
`..
`
`Hb Value in g./l100 ml. Blood
`8-1-12
`66 (19)
`60 (13)
`
`>_ 12.1
`46 (7)
`37 (6)
`
`< 8
`106 (5)
`91 (7)
`
`TABLE V.-Patients with Hb Value s 8 g./100 ml. Blood Treated
`with Iron-sorbitol or Iron-dextran
`
`Sex
`
`Before
`
`F
`F
`F
`F
`F
`M
`F
`Mean value
`Increase from
`initial value
`
`F
`F
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`Mean value
`Increase from
`initial value..
`
`5-4
`6-0
`6-2
`6-8
`7.0
`7-6
`7-8
`6-7
`
`-
`
`5-0
`6-0
`7-6
`7-8
`8-0
`8-0
`8-0
`7-2
`
`-
`
`Hb Value in g./100 ml. Blood
`Days from Start of Treatment
`I
`14
`7
`21
`Iron-sorbitol
`6-5
`7-6
`8-1
`8-3
`7-6
`9-2
`9-0
`8-0
`
`8-7
`8-9
`9-6
`10-3
`8-8
`9-8
`10-0
`9-4
`
`8-8
`9-3
`10-5
`11-4
`9.8
`10-0
`10-3
`10-0
`
`1 3
`Iron-dextran
`6-2
`6-0
`9-2
`8-7
`9-2
`9-3
`9-0
`8-2
`
`1-0
`
`2 7
`
`7-8
`7-6
`10-6
`10-0
`9-7
`10-3
`10-3
`9 5
`
`2-3
`
`3- 3
`
`8-5
`9-0
`11-2
`11*2
`10-8
`10-8
`11-4
`10-4
`
`3-2
`
`35
`
`9-2
`9.4
`11-2
`11-4
`10-3
`10-3
`11-4
`10-5
`
`3-8
`
`1
`1
`9-7
`10-8
`11-4
`12-8
`11-8
`11-4
`
`11-1
`
`3-9
`
`TABLE VI.-Increase in Hb Value in the Group with Pretreatment
`Hb Level 8.1-12 g. and > 12.1 g./ 100 ml. Blood
`
`Mean Value of Hb in
`g.'I00 ml. Blood
`
`Seru-n Iron,
`,ug. 100 ml.
`
`Preparation
`
`Hb No. of
`Range Cases Before
`Treat-
`ment
`
`8.1 12423
`Iron-sorbitol
`Iron-dextran f
`16
`. _
`Iron-sorbitol
`>121 f 9
`Iron-dextran 4~ VLl
`
`10-2
`10-2
`12-9
`13-1
`
`increase after Start
`of Treatment
`
`14
`7
`35
`21
`Days Days Days Days
`0-6
`2-3
`1-2
`1-6
`0-6
`1-5
`2-5
`1-1
`1-7
`1-0
`
`Incre5ayse
`Be
`35 Das
`fore
`After
`Treat- Start of
`ment Treat-
`ment
`34
`46
`37
`55
`
`28
`29
`44
`44
`
`showing a wide diversity in the degree of anaemia, it
`was divided into three subgroups (Table III) with a view
`to facilitating assessment of the therapeutic effect.
`In order to obtain a better idea of the degree of
`utilization of the administered iron for the haemoglobin
`synthesis the total dosage given was slightly on the small
`In all cases with anaemia the dosage given-
`side.
`1,000 mg. Fe-was not sufficient to restore the Hb
`TABLE I.-Age-and-sex Distribution of 65 Patients Treated
`
`______________
`
`Preparation
`
`Sex
`
`Age
`
`(Years)
`31-45
`46-60
`
`0-30
`
`Over 60
`
`Iron-sorbitol { Females
`Iron-dextran { Females
`Males
`
`11
`
`5
`2
`
`7
`
`6
`1
`
`8
`
`8
`5
`
`1
`
`3
`1
`
`Total
`
`} 34
`
`} 31
`4
`
`TABLE II.-Clinical Diagnoses
`Iron-
`sorbitol
`
`Iron-
`dextran
`
`Acquired haemolytic anaemia (sequel of
`splenectomy)
`Sideropenia ..
`Menometrorrhagia ..
`Duodenal and gastric ulcer
`Sequel of ventricular resection (B II)
`Ulcerative colitis
`..
`Polyposis of rectum
`.
`Diaphragmatic hernia with melaena
`TABLE III.-Distribution of Cases According to Pre-treatment
`Hb Value
`
`9
`12
`
`7 3
`
`.
`
`Preparation
`
`Iron-sorbitol
`Iron-dextran
`
`.7
`
`Hb Value in g./100 ml. Blood
`8 !81-12
`23
`16
`
`<8
`7
`
`121
`9
`11
`
`concentration to normal and to fill the body's iron
`depots. When the increase in Hb was thought to
`have ceased, eight patients who were still anaemic
`were given a further series of 10 injections of the same
`preparation as they had received before; hence the total
`courses of treatment amounted to 73.
`
`Clinical Methods
`The Hb and erythrocyte values were determined
`twice a week during treatment and subsequently once
`a week for at least four weeks.
`In the first 57 patients
`a daily reticulocyte count was made for 10 to 14 days.
`All these analyses were carried out by the same
`The serum-iron level was determined by
`assistant.*
`Agner's (1947) method before and 35 days after the start
`of treatment.
`The sedimentation rate, urinary sediment, and non-
`protein nitrogen were investigated in all patients, and the
`liver status was followed by bilirubin determinations,
`thymol turbidity tests, Takata-Ara tests, and determina-
`tions of the alkaline phosphatase.
`In some of the cases
`function was studied by means of an
`renal
`the
`endogenous creatinine-clearance test.
`
`Results
`Therapeutic Effect
`The therapeutic effect was assessed from the reticulo-
`cyte response and the increase obtained in the Hb and
`serum-iron values. The rise in the reticulocyte count,
`which for both preparations reached its maximum six
`to eight days after the start of therapy with a less-
`marked peak in
`the reticulocyte response than is
`observed in the treatment of pernicious anaemia, was
`*The analyses were made by Mrs. Kerstin Brumark, to whom
`I am greatly indebted.
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2044, P. 2
`
`

`
`JULY 29, 1961
`
`NEW INTRAMUSCULAR HAEMATINIC
`
`INTRAMUSCULAR HAEMATINIC
`
`277
`
`BRriTsH
`MEDICAL JOURNAL
`described as being similar to the reaction following an
`In no
`intramuscular vitamin or penicillin injection.
`case was the discomfort severe enough to warrant dis-
`In two of the patients
`continuation of the treatment.
`TABLE VII.-Renal Excretion of Iront in a Female Patient with
`Impaired Renal Function. Endogenous Creatinine-clearance
`Intramuscular
`N.P.N. 60 mg./100 ml. Blood.
`17 ml./min.
`in a Dose Corresponding to
`Iron-sorbitol
`Injection
`of
`50 mg. Fe
`
`Renal Excretion (%)
`Hours After Injection
`6-9
`3-6
`
`4-2
`
`1.9
`
`9-24
`2-1
`
`Total
`
`11-3
`
`0-2
`3 1
`
`the tenderness persisted for about a week after conclu-
`sion of the treatment. With the injection technique used
`no discoloration of the skin was observed.
`In one patient treated with iron-dextran a temperature
`rise to 38.2° C. was noted after the tenth injection.
`the
`Another patient, not included in
`evaluation,
`therapeutic
`refused
`to
`undergo further treatment on account
`of severe pain at the injection site in
`with a general
`feeling
`of
`association
`illness and a temperature rise to around
`Besides these two patients, a
`38° C.
`six who received iron-dextran
`further
`complained of pain around the site of
`injection; two of them took to their beds
`for a couple of days with highly inflamed,
`tender buttocks and thighs. No local
`discoloration of the skin was, however,
`the iron-dextran injec-
`observed after
`tions.
`
`therapeutic effect between the two preparations, as the
`increase in haemoglobin was the same for both. The
`in the serum-iron concentration recorded after
`rise
`treatment was also similar for both preparations. Some
`illustrative cases from the treatment are seen in Figs.
`2-5.
`
`Side-effects
`No general reactions in the form of temperature
`elevation, headache, nausea, vomiting, or chills were
`observed after the injection of iron-sorbitol in doses
`Some of the patients
`100 mg. Fe.
`equivalent
`to
`reported, however, that at a meal about one hour after
`the injection their normal sense of taste was affected;
`this reaction had disappeared completely after about 12
`hours.
`In five cases treated with iron-sorbitol a mild local
`reaction at the injection site, in the form of a feeling of
`distension with moderate tenderness to palpation, arose
`The sensation was
`immediately after the injection.
`
`RBC
`milL
`
`Hb
`gms
`
`Retic.
`
`5,0-
`
`15,0
`
`10,0-
`
`4,01 12,01 8,0-
`
`R.E
`
`3,01 9,01 6,0-
`
`2,0] 6,0] 4,0-
`
`/Retic.
`
`1,o0
`
`3,0]
`
`2,0
`
`Effect on Renal Function
`As already mentioned, about 30% of
`the iron is excreted with the urine after
`There was
`an injection of iron-sorbitol.
`no disturbance of the urinary sediment
`or increase in the non-protein nitrogen
`The urinary
`in any of the patients.
`sediment was normal also at the time
`when the iron excretion was at its maxi-
`mum and when the urine was somewhat
`function
`darkened.
`renal
`was
`The
`in an
`observed in about 10 patients
`creatinine-clearance
`endogenous
`test
`before
`and
`after
`the
`treatment; no
`+ +changes were demonstrated.
`Two patients with greatly impaired
`renal function were also studied. They
`were given gradually increasing doses,
`terminating in the one case with a dose
`of iron nine times and in the other case
`six times the 100-mg. dose.
`The first
`patient had a non-protein nitrogen level
`of 57 mg./00 ml. blood and a filtration
`of 10 ml./ min. before the treatment. The
`values were the same after the treatment.
`In the other patient the filtration value
`was 17 ml./min. both before and after
`nitrogen
`The non-protein
`treatment.
`was 60 mg./100 ml. blood before and
`after treatment;
`47 mg./100 ml.
`the
`sediment showed no changes. The urine
`patient was collected
`from the latter
`to
`d
`e24 hor su
`e
`s
`during the 24 hours subsequent to the
`
`6o
`Days
`-Woman aged 46 with abnormally profuse menstruation but in other
`respects normal.
`!etic.
`RBC Hb Ri
`%
`mill gms
`0,0-
`
`,Jectofer
`00100mg.x 0o
`o,oJ o,oI
`6
`
`12
`
`t8
`
`24
`
`30
`
`36
`
`42
`
`48
`
`54
`
`Fio. 2.-
`
`5,0o ]s,o 1
`
`8,0
`
`,Rs.c
`
`o-
`_-+
`
`/ +
`
`3.0-
`
`2,01
`
`1,0O
`
`6,0-
`
`40-
`
`2,0
`
`Hb+
`
`/
`
`\
`
`Retic,
`
`n-ju,u
`
`u,v
`
`Imferon
`0,0 1l00mg.x10 I
`12
`6
`
`18
`
`24
`
`30
`
`36
`
`42
`
`48
`
`54
`
`60
`Days
`-Man aged 68 with anaemia after a gastric haemorrhage (duodenal
`FIG. 3.-
`No other features of interest obtained from the clinical examination
`ulcer).
`or laboratory tests.
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2044, P. 3
`
`

`
`278
`
`JULY 29, 1961
`
`NEW INTRAMUSCULAR HAEMATINIC
`
`BR1TISH
`MEDICAL JOURNAL
`
`injection of a dose corresponding to 50 mg. of iron.
`The result is shown in Table VII. As may be seen, the
`patient excreted only 11.3% of the amount given, while
`healthy subjects excrete about 30% of this dose as well.
`
`mg. Fe, while only 100 mg. Fe was given in the present
`series.
`Systemic side-effects were also reported by these
`authors, but the incidence of such cannot be ascertained
`from their case reports.
`In the material with iron-
`dextran described in the present paper, 4 out of 32
`patients had severe side-effects and a further four
`complained of considerable discomfort after the treat-
`ment; hence the total incidence of side-effects amounted
`to about 25%.
`When iron-sorbitol was used, I noted neither systemic
`side-effects nor local discoloration.
`Local reactions
`in
`the form of
`feeling
`distension
`of
`occurred
`a
`in 5 of the 34 cases treated, or approximately 15%. A
`few patients also reported a transient effect on the taste.
`This ran approximately parallel to the absorption of the
`preparation as reflected in the increase of the iron
`concentration in serum.
`Recently there has been much discussion regarding
`the possible risk of a carcinogenic action of iron-dextran,
`since a high incidence of sarcoma was demonstrated in
`
`RmBC Hb Retic.
`%
`15,0- 10,0-
`
`5,0
`
`4,0-
`
`3,0
`
`2,0
`
`1,0
`
`5,0- 15,0- 10,0-
`
`3,0-
`
`2,0
`
`6,)-
`
`1,0
`
`3,0-
`
`0.0'I
`
`Imferon
`|100 mg.x 10
`6
`
`12
`
`.I
`18
`
`24
`
`I
`
`30
`
`36
`
`42
`
`48
`
`54
`
`60
`Oays
`FIG. 5.-Man aged 73 with polyposis of the rectum. No other pathological
`features noted in laboratory tests or on clinical examination.
`
`Discussion
`Treatment or iron-deficiency anaemia by intravenous
`therapy gave, according to Nissim (1949) and Andersson
`(1950), a rise in the Hb level of 0.64 g./100 ml. blood per
`100 mg. Fe; this corresponds to 100% utilization.
`Baird and Podmore (1954) stated
`that an intra-
`muscular injection of iron-dextran in a dose correspond-
`ing to 100 mg. Fe produced a rise in the Hb level of
`0.24 to 0.48 g./100 ml. blood (mean value 0.34). The
`results achieved with iron-dextran in this investigation
`fall within the values mentioned by Baird and Podmore,
`and in the group with the most advanced anaemia the
`increase was on an average 0.39 g. Hb per 100 ml.
`blood.
`With iron-sorbitol an increase of 0.38 g. /100
`ml. blood was obtained.
`Using the same
`basis for calculation as that applied by
`Nissim and by Andersson, the values
`obtained are equivalent to approximately
`60% utilization.
`In the groups with a pretreatment Hb
`level of 8.1-12 g./100 ml. blood the
`utilization of the two preparations was
`the same, or, applying the aforemen-
`tioned calculation basis, 36% for the iron-
`sorbitol and 39% for the iron-dextran
`group; in the patients with an initial Hb
`level of over 12 g. /100 ml. blood the
`corresponding figures were 27% and 16%
`for iron-sorbitol and iron-dextran, respec-
`tively. The lower utilization percentage
`in the last-named group is due to the fact
`that in a large number of these cases the
`Hb value had been normalized, and it
`must therefore
`be assumed that
`the
`excess was present as depot iron. Hence
`the clinical investigation has shown that
`in
`the
`iron-deficiency
`of
`treatment
`anaemia iron-sorbitol
`gives
`the same
`good therapeutic results as iron-dextran,
`despite the fact that 30% of the injected
`iron is excreted with the urine.
`As approximately 60% of the iron given
`in the form of iron-sorbitol had been
`Hb-synthesis
`utilized
`the
`for
`in
`the
`patients
`highest
`with
`degree
`the
`of
`anaemia, about 90%of the dose admini-
`stered could thus be accounted for. For
`iron-dextran
`about
`60%
`could
`be
`accounted for; this may be explained by
`the fact that a large amount may remain
`in the muscle.
`Grimes and Hutt (1957),
`for instance, when using preparations
`marked with 59Fe, found that 17-45%
`remained at the site of injection, and
`Karlefors and Norden (1958) reached a
`similar conclusion.
`The latter authors
`noted discoloration of the skin in 25%
`of their patients
`after treatment with
`iron-dextran;
`complications
`such
`no
`were observed in the present material.
`The explanation of this may be that
`Karlefors and Norddn gave doses of 250
`
`O. of
`V,
`
`O. 0J,
`.V,
`
`.
`
`Jectofer
`lOOmg.x 10
`O_LI
`6
`12
`
`18
`
`--
`
`24
`
`.
`
`30
`
`..I
`36
`42
`
`48
`
`54
`
`60
`Days
`FIG. 4.-Woman aged 68 with hyperten sion of several years' standing. Severe
`attacks of haemorrhage from the nose in 1958. Now she had anaemia after
`a gastric haemorrhage (duodenal ulcer). No other observations of interest.
`RBC H b Retic.
`mill.gms %
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2044, P. 4
`
`

`
`JULY 29, 1961
`
`NEW INTRAMUSCULAR HAEMATINIC
`
`BmDICsOHRi_
`
`279
`
`The clinical importance of this
`animal experiments.
`observation, however, has still to be elucidated. Lundin
`(1961), using the same technique as Richmond (1959),
`After iron-
`has confirmed this action of iron-dextran.
`sorbitol, on the contrary, no sarcoma developed.
`
`Summary
`A preparation containing an iron-sorbitol-citric-acid
`complex (" jectofer ") and intended for intramuscular
`injection has been studied from the aspects of tolerance
`Comparisons are
`and therapeutic effect in 39 cases.
`drawn with iron-dextran (" imferon ") (34 cases). The
`clinical tolerance for the iron-sorbitol complex was
`good, and only mild local side-effects were noted. The
`therapeutic result was satisfactory, and in patients with
`an Hb concentration of less than 8 g./100 ml. blood the
`increase in the Hb level was 3.8 g./100 ml. for the iron-
`sorbitol group and 3.9 g./100 ml. for the iron-dextran
`This corresponds approximately to a 60%
`group.
`utilization of the iron in the preparation. About 30%
`of the dose administered is excreted in the urine without
`producing any noticeable effect on the renal function.
`
`REFERENCES
`Agner, Kj. (1947). Kliniska Laborationsmetoder, 5, 573. Astra,
`Sodertalje.
`Andersson, N. S. E., and Nordenson, N. G. (1948). Acta
`haemat. (Basel), 1, 193.
`Andersson, N. S. E. (1950). Acta med. scand., Suppl. 241.
`and Bergstrom, I. (1956). Svenska Lak.-Tidn., 53, 13.
`Baird, I. M., and Podmore, D. A. (1954). Lancet, 2, 942.
`Brown, E. B., and Moore, C. V. (1956). In L. M. Tocantin's
`Progress in Hematology, 1, 22.
`Fletcher, F., and London, E. (1954). Brit. med. J., 1, 984.
`Grimes, A. J., and Hutt, M. S. R. (1957). Ibid., 2. 1074.
`J. nat. Cancer. Inst.,
`Haddow, A., and Homing, E. S. (1960).
`24. 109.
`Karlefors, T., and Norden, A. (1958). Acta med. scand., Suppl.
`342.
`Lindvall, S., and Andersson, N. S. E. (1961). To be published.
`Lundin, P. M. (1961). To be published.
`Nissim, J. A. (1947). Lancet, 2, 49.
`(1949). M.D. thesis, University of London.
`Richmond, H. G. (1959). Brit. med. J., 1, 947.
`(1960). In R. V. Raven's Cancer Progress, p. 24.
`Svard, P. 0. (1961). To be published.
`
`INTRAVENOUS IRON-DEXTRIN IN
`IRON-DEFICIENCY ANAEMIA
`BY
`J. FIELDING, M.R.C.P., D.P.H.
`Consultant Haematologist, Paddington General Hospital,
`London
`
`The use of parenteral iron preparations in the treatment
`of iron-deficiency anaemias has passed through several
`Baird and Podmore (1954) point out that
`phases.
`Claude Bernard used intravenous iron in animals. Many
`preparations have been tried, including iron gluconate
`(Reznikoff and Goebel, 1937), ascorbate (Friend, 1938),
`and triethanolamine (Brownlee et al., 1942), but toxicity
`Cappell (1930),
`and pain precluded their clinical use.
`in an extensive study in mice, demonstrated the reticulo-
`endothelial uptake of saccharated iron oxide after intra-
`and its subsequent redistribution.
`venous injection
`Nissim (1947) established that saccharated iron oxide
`Its
`was an effective therapy by the intravenous route.
`disadvantages were lack of stability in plasma, the risk
`of severe and painful inflammatory reactions when
`injected outside a vein, and a moderate incidence of
`toxic reactions (Nissim, 1954; Ross, 1957).
`
`Cappell et al.
`(1954), Baird and Podmore (1954),
`Jennison and Ellis (1954), and Scott and Govan (1954)
`reported favourably on a high-molecular carbohydrate
`iron complex, iron-dextran ("imferon"), suitable for
`intramuscular use.
`This complex has been the subject
`of many clinical and experimental studies. The ease of
`intramuscular administration and the relative freedom
`from general toxic reactions soon made iron-dextran
`the most frequently chosen preparation when parenteral
`iron was indicated.
`Interest in the intravenous route
`declined.
`Iron-dextran has also been given
`intra-
`venously, but, although no large series has been reported,
`it appears that toxic reactions, including anaphylaxis,
`often occur (Callender and Smith, 1954; Ross, 1955;
`MacKenzie and Lawson, 1959; Brit. med. J., 1960b),
`and no investigator has reported with any enthusiasm
`on its intravenous use.
`Richmond (1957, 1959) reported the induction of
`sarcomas by iron-dextran in rats, and his findings were
`confirmed by Haddow and Homing (1960) in mice.
`There has since been a good deal of speculation on how
`far this
`carcinogenic activity for mice and rats
`is
`applicable to man (Brit. med. J., 1960a; Golberg, 1960;
`Haddow, 1960; Duthie et al., 1960). No definite answer
`can be given to this question at present. One result of
`this unexpected finding has been a renewed interest
`in the intravenous administration of parenteral iron.
`The preparation for intravenous use reported here is
`not a new one, although it has not until recently been
`available in this country.
`Andersson (1950), Lucas and
`Hagedorn (1952), and Hagedorn (1952) report on its
`efficacy in iron-deficiency anaemias and its freedom
`from toxic reactions.
`The Preparation.-The preparation used is a dextrin-
`iron known as " astrafer." The manufacturers describe
`the preparation as a high-molecular-weight iron-carbo-
`hydrate complex.
`It contains 20 mg. of iron per ml. in
`isotonic solution, is stable in saline and plasma, and
`has a pH of 7.3. The iron is trivalent. The complex
`differs from iron-dextran in having a lower-molecular-
`weight carbohydrate, dextrin, as the protective carrier
`for colloidal ferric hydroxide.
`
`Methods and Materials
`Iron-dextrin was used as astrafer, iron-dextran as
`"imferon," and saccharated iron oxide as " ferrivenin."
`Haemoglabin is estimated as oxyhaemoglobin, using
`a Unicam SP 300 photoelectric colorimeter. The instru-
`ment is frequently checked by chemically estimated
`blood samples supplied by the M.R.C. and by a glycerin-
`preserved sample of haemoglobin: 14.6 g. Hb per 100
`ml. is referred to as 100% Hb.
`Serum-iron estimations on patients not receiving iron
`complex were made by the method of Kok and Wild
`(1960), but in the presence of iron-carbohydrate com-
`plex a more vigorous hydrolysis is required to liberate
`all bound iron, and the method of Trinder (1956) was
`used.
`Haemolysis is usually measured by the amount of
`haemoglobin freed from red cells, or by the haemo-
`globin content of residual intact red cells. The dark
`colour and viscosity of iron-complex solutions make
`measurement of their haemolytic power by haemoglobin
`methods rather inaccurate and tedious.
`A red-cell-
`counting technique was used, based on the EEL elec-
`tronic
`blood-cell
`counter.
`The greatly
`improved
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2044, P. 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket