throbber
British Journal of Haematology, 2003, 120, 853–859
`
`Pharmacokinetics and red cell utilization of 52Fe/59Fe-labelled
`iron polymaltose in anaemic patients using positron emission
`tomography
`
`Soheir Beshara,1 Jens So¨ rensen,2,3 Mark Lubberink,4 Vladimir Tolmachev,4 Bengt La˚ ngstro¨ m,3
`Gunnar Antoni,3 Bo G. Danielson5* and Hans Lundqvist4 1Department of Clinical Chemistry and
`2Department of Clinical Physiology, University Hospital, 3PET Centre and 4Department of Biomedical Radiation Sciences,
`Uppsala University, and 5Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
`
`Received 13 August 2001; accepted for publication 6 February 2002
`
`iron–polysaccharide complexes are
`Summary. Parenteral
`increasingly applied. The pharmacokinetics of iron sucrose
`have been assessed by our group using positron emission
`tomography (PET). A single intravenous
`injection of
`100 mg iron as iron (III) hydroxide–polymaltose complex,
`labelled with a tracer in the form of 52Fe/59Fe, was similarly
`assessed in six patients using PET for about 8 h. Red cell
`utilization was followed for 4 weeks. Iron polymaltose was
`similarly distributed to the liver, spleen and bone marrow.
`However, a larger proportion of this complex was rapidly
`distributed to the bone marrow. The shorter equilibration
`phase for the liver, about 25 min, indicates the minimal role
`of the liver for direct distribution. Splenic uptake also
`reflected the reticuloendothelial handling of this complex.
`
`Red cell utilization ranged from 61% to 99%. Despite the
`relatively higher uptake by the bone marrow, there was no
`saturation of marrow transport systems at this dose level. In
`conclusion, high red cell utilization of
`iron polymaltose
`occurred in anaemic patients. The major portion of the
`injected dose was rapidly distributed to the bone marrow. In
`addition, the reticuloendothelial uptake of this complex may
`reflect the safety of polysaccharide complexes. Non-satura-
`tion of transport systems to the bone marrow indicated the
`presence of a large interstitial transport pool, which might
`possibly be transferrin.
`
`Keywords: positron emission tomography (PET), 52Fe, 59Fe,
`iron polymaltose, red cell utilization.
`
`Iron preparations for therapeutic administration include
`both iron salts and iron hydroxide–polysaccharide com-
`plexes. The latter group constitutes formulations for paren-
`teral administration, which have been increasingly applied
`over the last few years (Macdougall, 1994; Macdougall et al,
`1996).
`Two main concerns have, however, emerged as a
`consequence of the parenteral application of these com-
`plexes, namely, the iron distribution in the different organs,
`which may be related to late organ damage due to iron
`accumulation, and the second is the release of free iron that
`may result in oxidative stress (Figueiredo et al, 1993). The
`rate of iron release from a complex has been suggested to be
`closely related to the molecular weight of this particular
`complex. The pharmacokinetics of the individual complexes
`
`in terms of iron distribution as well as its availability for
`marrow utilization need to be further explored.
`In earlier
`studies,
`the pharmacokinetics and red
`cell utilization of 100 mg of
`iron hydroxide sucrose
`were
`studied using
`positron emission tomography
`(PET) (Beshara et al, 1999a,b). Iron (III) hydroxide poly-
`maltose is another polysaccharide iron preparation for
`intravenous administration with a molecular weight of
`about 150 kDa.
`The aim of the study was to assess the pharmacokinetics
`and red cell utilization of iron polymaltose by evaluation of
`the uptake and distribution characteristics of 52Fe/59Fe-
`labelled complex, using the PET technique as well as an
`extended follow-up of radioiron red cell utilization.
`
`Correspondence: Dr Soheir Beshara, Department of Clinical Chem-
`istry, University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail:
`soheir.beshara@medsci.uu.se
`*Professor emeritus.
`
`Patients. Six patients (two men and four women), with
`a mean age ± SD of 45 ± 16 years (range 29–73), were
`included in the study. Baseline haemoglobin ranged from
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`853
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2041, P. 1
`
`

`
`854
`
`S. Beshara et al
`
`Table I. Baseline characteristics of the patients.
`
`Age
`(years)
`
`No
`
`Sex
`
`Diagnosis
`
`Hb
`(g/dl)
`
`S-creatinine
`(lmol/l)
`
`S-Fe
`(lmol/l)
`
`S-ferritin
`(lg/l)
`
`TIBC
`(lmol/l)
`
`TS
`(%)
`
`dose
`(U/kg/w)
`
`duration
`(months)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`42
`35
`39
`54
`28
`73
`
`f
`f
`m
`m
`f
`f
`
`IDA
`ID
`IDA
`Diabetic nephropathy + ID
`Polycystic kidney + RA
`Interstitial nephritis + RA
`
`11Æ3
`12Æ4
`10Æ5
`13Æ2
`10Æ7
`12Æ5
`
`74
`80
`86
`266
`295
`207
`
`7
`9Æ7
`3Æ2
`4Æ6
`20
`19Æ4
`
`3Æ4
`4Æ4
`6Æ1
`178
`151
`224
`
`74
`88
`94
`55
`58
`48
`
`9Æ6
`11
`3Æ4
`8Æ4
`34
`40
`
`–
`–
`–
`20
`80
`30
`
`–
`–
`–
`48
`16
`46
`
`rHuEpo therapy
`
`S-Fe, serum iron; TIBC, total iron-binding capacity; TS, transferrin saturation; rHuEpo, recombinant human erythropoietin; U/kg/w,
`unit/kg/week; m, month; IDA, iron deficiency anaemia; RA, renal anaemia; ID, iron deficiency.
`
`10Æ5 to 13Æ2 g/dl. Three patients were treated with recom-
`binant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) at a weekly dose of
`20–80 U/kg. None of the patients had received a blood
`transfusion during the 4 weeks prior to inclusion. Causes of
`anaemia other than iron deficiency or renal anaemia were
`excluded and iron supplementation therapy was not
`allowed during the study. Baseline and clinical character-
`istics of the patients are described in Table I. The study was
`approved by the Ethics Committee and the Isotopes Com-
`mittee of the Medical Faculty of Uppsala University, and
`informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
`Radiopharmaceutical method. The production of 52Fe was
`performed as described earlier (Beshara et al, 1999a).
`59FeCl3 was purchased from Amersham (London, UK) in
`the form of solution in 0Æ1 mol/l HCl. Before the synthesis of
`the iron polymaltose, 59FeCl3 (in 0Æ01 mol/l HCl) and
`52FeCl3 were mixed with a ratio of radioactivity of 1:40,
`respectively, and the total volume was adjusted to 1 ml.
`Radiolabelled iron polymaltose was prepared, according to
`the method developed by Vifor (St. Gallen, Switzerland).
`Sucrose (100 mg) was dissolved in the iron solution and the
`pH was adjusted to above 11Æ8 with 5 mol/l NaOH. Iron
`polymaltose (2 ml, corresponding to 100 mg of Fe III) was
`added to this solution. HCl was then added until the pH was
`between 4Æ5 and 7 and the solution was filtered through a
`sterilized 0Æ22 lm filter into a sterile injection bottle. The
`injection bolus was diluted to 20 ml using physiological
`saline and applied over 10 min using a constant volume
`infusion pump.
`The injected positron-derived radioactivity (52Fe/52mMn)
`given to the individual patients ranged from 17Æ4 to 22Æ1
`MBq. The amount of 59Fe was less than 0Æ5 MBq in all the
`patients. The effective dose, for the amounts of radioactivity
`given to the individual patients, was calculated using the
`model described by Robertson et al (1983) and was found to
`be about a total of 5 mSv for 52Fe and 3 mSv for 59Fe. These
`levels were approved for
`this
`study by the Isotopes
`Committee of the Medical Faculty.
`PET imaging, data acquisition and corrections. PET imaging
`and data analysis were done as described earlier (Beshara
`
`et al, 1999a,b). Data analysis was applied in order to
`obtain standardized uptake values. The PET camera
`measures radioactivity concentration (Bq/cc). When this
`is normalized for the injected radioactivity/g body weight,
`with the assumption that tissue density is 1 g/cc, a ratio
`value called the standardized uptake value (SUV)
`is
`obtained.
`The net influx of the radioactivity from blood to tissue as
`well as the sizes of the reversible pools were analysed using
`a compartment model; namely blood, reversible and irre-
`versible tissue pools (Rutland, 1979; Patlak et al, 1983;
`Patlak & Blasberg, 1985). The relationship between the
`tracer concentration in the blood and tissue may be
`described as follows:
`C=Cb ¼ Vd þ Kt  T
`Cb ðsÞ ds=Cb ðtÞ:
`
`Z
`
`t
`
`in which T ¼
`
`0
`The time courses of C and Cb (tissue and blood concen-
`tration of the tracer respectively) are measured from the
`tomograms. Vd is the fractional distribution volume of the
`reversible compartments (no units),
`t
`is the real-time
`following tracer administration (min) and Kt is the transfer
`rate constant into the irreversible compartment (/min). The
`integrated part of the equation constitutes the transformed
`time, which is used to linearize the relationship between
`tissue and blood concentration. It has a dimension of time
`as it represents the time integration of the blood curve
`divided by the blood curve itself. As C/Cb is a ratio between
`tissue and blood concentration of the tracer, it therefore has
`no units. According to this model, the intercept of the linear
`part of the plot represents the distribution volume of the
`tracer in the reversible compartment and the slope repre-
`sents the influx constant, which describes the rate of
`transfer of
`iron from the blood into the irreversible
`compartment. This transfer may also be seen as a clearance
`process, in which Kt represents volume of blood cleared/unit
`time/volume of tissue.
`Radioactivity concentrations were corrected for 52mMn as
`described in an earlier study (Lubberink et al, 1999).
`
`Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 120: 853–859
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2041, P. 2
`
`

`
`Pharmacokinetics and Red Cell Utilization of 52Fe/59Fe iron polymaltose
`Radioiron (59Fe) red cell utilization (%)
`This was performed as described earlier (Beshara et al,
`1999a,b), where the red cell utilization (%) was calculated
`as follows:
`Red cell utilization (%) on day n ¼
`WBA=ml on day n=Injected 59Fe radioactivity
` total blood volume ðmlÞ  100
`
`RESULTS
`
`855
`
`in which WBA is whole blood radioactivity.
`The total blood volume was based on the initial dilution
`of the administered isotope. A linear regression was applied,
`using the PET data from the heart, typically between 10 and
`30 min, and extrapolated to the time of injection. The PET
`data were corrected for 52mMn.
`Total blood volume (ml) ¼
`injected activity ðBqÞ=whole blood radioactivity
`concentration extrapolated to 0 min ðBq=mlÞ
`
`The blood-volume values as determined using the PET
`data from the heart were compared with predicted blood
`volume calculated from the weights and heights according
`to the equations described by Nadler et al (1962).
`
`PET measurements
`The time span of the kinetic studies in the patients ranged
`from 7Æ87 to 8Æ14 h. Changes in the radioactivity concen-
`tration in the different tissues over time are shown in
`Fig 1.
`Blood kinetics. Blood kinetics were similar to that of the
`iron–sucrose complex. However, the blood radioactivity,
`measured by PET in the left ventricle of the heart, reached
`values of 13–23% by the end of the study.
`Organ uptake. A distribution phase of about 25 min was
`noted in liver and spleen uptake of
`iron polymaltose.
`Standardized uptake values are calculated through normal-
`izing the measured radioactivity concentration (Bq/cc) for
`the injected radioactivity per gram body weight (Bq/g), with
`the assumption that tissue density is 1g/cc. A mean liver
`and spleen uptake of about 27 and 16, respectively, was
`shown. A slight decrease in liver radioactivity was seen by
`the end of the PET investigation in all the patients, where
`the radioactivity reached 55% of the peak value. In patients
`4 and 6, an increasing uptake throughout the whole first
`scanning session,
`i.e. 85 min, was followed by a slight
`
`Fig 1. Uptake values of labelled 52Fe-polymaltose in the liver (L), spleen (S) and bone marrow (BM) in one of the patients taken at 0Æ5, 3Æ5 and
`8 h after injection. The injected radioactivity (Bq) is assumed to be homogeneously distributed all over the body. With the assumption of a
`tissue density of 1 g/cc, standardized uptake values (SUV) therefore indicate tissue uptake per cc in relation to the injected radioactivity when
`normalized for the average body uptake per cc. In this patient, maximum radioactivity concentration in BM after 8 h is up to 103 times higher
`than average body concentration.
`
`Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 120: 853–859
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2041, P. 3
`
`

`
`856
`
`S. Beshara et al
`
`Fig 2. 52Fe-polymaltose uptake curves in the
`liver, the spleen and the bone marrow in
`patient 3. Standardized uptake values are
`presented on the Y-axis. These are calculated
`through normalizing the measured
`radioactivity concentration (Bq/cc) for the
`injected radioactivity per gram (g) body
`weight, with the assumption that tissue
`density is 1 g/cc. The blood clearance curve is
`also presented.
`
`decrease towards the end of the study. In the bone marrow
`uptake curves, a fast radioactivity uptake was seen during
`the first 10 min followed by an influx of the radioactivity
`into the bone marrow at a lower but steady rate.
`Representative uptake curves in the liver, spleen and the
`bone marrow in patient 3 are shown in Fig 2.
`Graphical analysis. In the bone marrow, no equilibration
`phase was seen but a straight line was found from the very
`beginning in all the patients but patient 4. For the liver, the
`equilibration could be seen after about 20 min, while for
`the spleen, the equilibration varied in the different patients.
`
`The intercepts of the linear part of the liver in the individual
`patients ranged from 0Æ55 to 1Æ33, while that of the bone
`marrow gave a smaller intercept, which ranged from 0Æ02
`to 0Æ57. The slopes of the linear part of the regression
`analysis of the bone marrow reached up to 16 times that of
`the liver (range 1Æ9–15Æ7). Representative linear regression
`plots in patient 3 are shown in Fig 3.
`
`Radioiron (59Fe) red cell utilization (%)
`Predicted blood volumes were within ± 10% of the calcu-
`lated blood volumes in all patients (Nadler et al, 1962).
`
`Fig 3. Regression plots in the liver, spleen and bone marrow in patient 3. The radioactivity concentration on the Y-axis is a ratio between
`tissue and blood, and therefore dimensionless, whereas the transformed time on the X-axis represents the time integration of the blood–
`radioactivity curve divided by the blood–radioactivity curve itself. According to the applied compartment model, the intercept of the linear part
`represents the distribution volume and the slope represents the transfer rate constant from the blood to the irreversible compartment.
`
`Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 120: 853–859
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2041, P. 4
`
`

`
`Pharmacokinetics and Red Cell Utilization of 52Fe/59Fe iron polymaltose
`
`857
`
`Fig 4. Follow-up data of the rate of
`59Fe-iron polymaltose red cell utilization
`in the individual patients. Day 0 is the
`day of PET investigation.
`
`The maximum radioiron red cell utilization ranged from
`61 to 99% and was reached after 16–24 d. Follow-up data
`of the rate of red cell utilization in the individual patients are
`presented in Fig 4.
`
`Changes in Hb levels, reticulocyte counts and iron status
`In all the patients but two (patients 4 and 6), Hb levels
`increased by 1Æ68 ± 0Æ8 g/dl (range 0Æ8–2Æ4 g/dl) within
`2–23 d following administration of the drug. Rapid increase
`in reticulocyte counts within 1–6 d was noted in patients 1,
`2 and 3. In patients 4 and 6, reticulocytosis was noted after
`20 and 14 d respectively.
`In patients 1, 2 and 3, there was a direct increase in
`serum (S)-ferritin levels of eightfold to twelvefold above the
`baseline within 2 d, followed by a decline to baseline levels
`by the end of the study. Minor changes in S-ferritin levels
`were noted in patients 4, 5 and 6.
`
`Adverse events
`No adverse events were experienced by any of the patients
`during or following the application of the drug. One patient
`acquired a haematoma at the site of injection with slowly
`resolving paresthesia. This was not deemed a drug-related
`side effect, however, it might be a drug delivery-related side
`effect.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The liver, spleen and bone marrow have been identified as
`the major pathways for endogenous iron metabolism
`(Finch et al, 1970). The relative distribution of
`the
`complex has shown a much higher uptake by the bone
`marrow in relation to the liver and spleen uptake,
`compared with the uptake pattern of the iron–sucrose
`complex.
`As the injected iron polymaltose was handled through
`these organs, a finding which was consistent with the
`
`iron–sucrose pattern (Beshara et al, 1999a,b), these organs
`seem to represent the major pathway for the pharmaco-
`kinetics of
`injected iron polysaccharides. Whether the
`injected iron was
`taken up by the macrophages or
`parenchymal cells is of relevance both to its potential
`toxicity and availability. The uptake by the macrophage-
`rich spleen of
`this iron complex, determined by PET
`technique, was consistent with our observation for the
`iron–sucrose complex. Such reticuloendothelial uptake of
`the injected iron polysaccharides was thought to indirectly
`illustrate the safety of these preparations with regard to
`the long-term effects on the parenchyma of the various
`tissues.
`The high red cell utilization in the different patients
`indicated the efficacy of this iron complex. The variation in
`the percentage red cell utilization was consistent with the
`observed variations in the early distribution of the complex,
`as noted in patients 4 and 6.
`The increase in S-ferritin levels illustrated the replenish-
`ment of the depleted iron stores, which is a well-identified
`and desired effect of iron therapy.
`An interesting observation in this study was that the
`early distribution to the liver was quantitatively much
`less for this complex compared with that of the iron–
`sucrose complex. This,
`in turn, reflected on marrow
`uptake, which reached higher
`levels at earlier
`time
`points. The different preparations, although having a
`similar general distribution pattern, clearly differed in
`their early distribution components. The early pharma-
`cokinetics of the iron sucrose, molecular weight 43 kDa,
`involves the liver and spleen as a buffer to a relatively
`high degree before reaching the marrow, an observation
`which was not found for the iron polymaltose, molecular
`weight 150 kDa.
`The graphical analysis provided two values, namely the
`intercept and the slope, which reflected the distribution
`volume of 52Fe equilibrating with 52Fe in the blood, and the
`
`Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 120: 853–859
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2041, P. 5
`
`

`
`S. Beshara et al
`858
`influx-rate constant of 52Fe to a compartment which binds
`52Fe irreversibly within the time frame of the study. An
`observation of interest in this study, which was performed
`in vivo, was that the blood to bone marrow transfer-
`rate constant was steady, irrespective of the large variation
`in the blood–iron concentration over the range observed.
`This indicates that despite the high doses of iron admin-
`istered,
`saturation of
`the transport process was not
`reached.
`Under physiological conditions, transport iron is com-
`posed almost exclusively of transferrin-bound iron (Huebers
`& Finch, 1984). One interesting observation, as shown by
`the compartment analysis, which is consistent with our
`earlier studies, is the non-saturation of the transport system
`to the bone marrow at the applied dose level. During the
`study period of 8 h, about 80% of the injected dose was
`cleared from the circulation, most of which was distributed
`in the bone marrow. This exceeded the capacity of plasma
`transferrin by several
`fold. This raises the question of
`possible transport pathways into the bone marrow. One
`possible mechanism is that the iron complex is rapidly
`transported from the plasma into the interstitium, where
`the iron is
`then delivered to an interstitial pool of
`transferrin. This can, in turn, be the source of cellular iron
`uptake. The transport of plasma transferrin over the blood–
`marrow membrane, which can be thought a rate-limiting
`step, is thus of less significance. Direct transferrin uptake of
`iron from polysaccharide complexes has been shown in vitro
`using the iron–sucrose complex (Danielson et al, 1996). A
`similar model has been suggested to explain tumour uptake
`of 67Ga through the transferrin system (Weiner, 1996). The
`buffer capacity of the iron complex, as well as the presence
`of such an interstitial pool of
`transferrin in the bone
`marrow, would explain the tolerance of the injected doses of
`iron complex without having the hazards of free radical
`formation when exceeding the plasma transferrin transport
`capacity. In fact, a parallel elimination process of the iron–
`polymaltose from the blood could be postulated. On one
`hand, uptake of the iron complex by the reticuloendothelial
`system in the macrophage-rich organs could take place,
`with redistribution to the bone marrow, although at a
`relatively low proportion. On the other hand, a direct
`uptake of
`iron by transferrin within the bone marrow
`interstitium can be suggested. Studying the distribution
`characteristics of the various iron complexes is therefore of
`great importance. We cannot exclude other mechanisms of
`cellular iron uptake directly from the complex (Conrad et al,
`1999; Conrad & Umbreit, 2000).
`iron
`In conclusion,
`the early pharmacokinetics of
`polymaltose using the PET technique showed a distribution
`through the liver, spleen and bone marrow, with the
`major portion of the injected dose preferentially distributed
`to the bone marrow. High red cell utilization (up to 99%)
`was found. The least utilization was found in the patient
`with functional iron deficiency, indicating the possible role
`of subtle inflammation.
`In this particular patient,
`late
`utilization was consistent with the early distribution
`pattern. There was no saturation of the transport system
`to the bone marrow at this dose level. Different transport
`
`systems might be involved in iron transport through the
`interstitium.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The authors acknowledge the contribution to the study of
`Margareta Forsman for her assistance with patient data
`collection and Iva Kulhanek for secretarial assistance. We
`also acknowledge the Swedberg Laboratory for technical
`assistance with 52Fe production and the PET Centre staff for
`assistance with the patients.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Beshara, S., Lundqvist, H., Sundin, J., Lubberink, M., Tolmachev,
`V., Valind, S., Antoni, G., La˚ngstro¨m, B. & Danielson, B.G.
`(1999a) Kinetic analysis of 52Fe-labelled iron (III) hydroxide–
`sucrose complex following bolus administration using positron
`emission tomography. British Journal of Haematology, 104, 288–
`295.
`Beshara, S., Lundqvist, H., Sundin, J., Lubberink, M., Tolmachev,
`V., Valind, S., Antoni, G., La˚ngstro¨m, B. & Danielson, B.G.
`(1999b) Pharmacokinetics and red cell utilization of iron (III)
`hydroxide–sucrose complex in anaemic patients – a study using
`positron emission tomography. British Journal of Haematology,
`104, 296–302.
`Conrad, M.E. & Umbreit, J.N. (2000) Iron absorption and transport
`– an update. American Journal of Hematology, 64, 287–298.
`Conrad, M.E., Umbreit, J.N. & Moore, E.G. (1999) Iron absorption and
`transport. American Journal of Medical Sciences, 318, 213–229.
`Danielson, B.G., Salmonson, T., Derendorf, H. & Geisser, P. (1996)
`Pharmacokinetics of iron (III)-hydroxide sucrose complex after a
`single intravenous dose in healthy volunteers. Drug Research, 46,
`615–621.
`Figueiredo, M.S., Baffa, O., Barbieri Neto, J. & Zago, M.A. (1993)
`Liver injury and generation of hydroxyl free radicals in experi-
`mental secondary hemochromatosis. Research in Experimental
`Medicine, 193, 27–37.
`Finch, C.A., Deubelbeiss, K., Cook, J.D., Eschbach, J.W., Harker,
`L.A., Funk, D.D., Marsaglia, G., Hillman, R.S., Slichter, S.,
`Adamson, J.W., Ganzoni, A. & Giblett, E.R. (1970) Ferrokinetics
`in man. Medicine, 49, 17–53.
`Huebers, H.A. & Finch, C.A. (1984) Transferrin: physiologic beha-
`viour and clinical implication. Blood, 64, 763–767.
`Lubberink, M., Tolmachev, V., Beshara, S. & Lundqvist, H. (1999)
`Quantification aspects of patient studies with 52Fe in positron
`emission tomography. Applied Radiation and
`Isotopes, 51,
`707–715.
`Macdougall, I.C. (1994) Monitoring of iron status and iron sup-
`plementation in patients treated with erythropoietin. Current
`Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 3, 620–625.
`Macdougall, I.C., Tucker, B., Thompson, J., Tomson, C.R., Baker,
`L.R. & Raine, A.E. (1996) A randomized controlled study of iron
`supplementation in patients treated with erythropoietin. Kidney
`International, 50, 1694–1699.
`Nadler, S.B., Hidalgo, J.U. & Bloch, T. (1962) Prediction of blood
`volume in normal human adults. Surgery, 51, 224–232.
`Patlak, C.S. & Blasberg, R.G. (1985) Graphical evaluation of blood-
`to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data.
`Generalizations. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 5,
`584–590.
`(1983)
`J.D.
`Patlak, C.S., Blasberg, R.G. & Fenestermacher,
`Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from
`
`Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 120: 853–859
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2041, P. 6
`
`

`
`Pharmacokinetics and Red Cell Utilization of 52Fe/59Fe iron polymaltose
`
`859
`
`multiple-time uptake data. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and
`Metabolism, 3, 1–7.
`Robertson,
`J.S., Price, R.R., Budinger, T.F., Fairbanks, V.F. &
`Pollycove, M. (1983) Radiation absorbed doses from Iron-52,
`Iron-55, and Iron-59 used to study ferrokinetics. Journal of
`Nuclear Medicine, 24, 339–348.
`
`Rutland, M.D. (1979) A single injection technique for subtraction of
`blood background in 131I hippuran renograms. British Journal of
`Radiology, 52, 134–137.
`(1996) The mechanism of 67Ga localization in
`Weiner, R.E.
`malignant disease. Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 23, 745–751.
`
`Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 120: 853–859
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2041, P. 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket