throbber
NIH Public Access
`Author Manuscript
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`Published in final edited form as:
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2008 January ; 19(1): 82–90.
`
`Tandem MS can Distinguish Hyaluronic Acid from N-
`Acetylheparosan
`
`Zhenqing Zhang1,#, Jin Xie1,#, Jian Liu2, and Robert J. Linhardt1,*
`1Departments of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Chemical and Biological Engineering and Biology, Center
`for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, 12180
`2Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products, School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina,
`Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
`
`Abstract
`Isobaric oligosaccharides enzymatically prepared from hyaluronic acid (HA) and N-acetylheparosan
`(NAH), were distinguished using tandem mass spectrometry. The only difference between the two
`series of oligosaccharides was the linkage pattern (in HA 1→3 and in NAH 1→4) between glucuronic
`acid and N-acetylglucosamine residues. Tandem mass spectrometry afforded spectra, in which
`glycosidic cleavage fragment ions were observed for both HA and NAH oligosaccharides. Cross-
`ring cleavage ions 0,2An and 0,2An-h (n is even number) were observed only in GlcNAc residues of
`NAH oligosaccharides. One exception was an 0,2A2 ion fragment observed for the disaccharide from
`HA. These cross-ring cleavage fragment ions are useful to definitively distinguish HA and NAH
`oligosaccharides.
`
`Keywords
`hyaluronic acid; N-acetylheparosan; oligosaccharide; tandem mass spectrometry; fragmentation
`
`Introduction
`Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are linear, acidic polysaccharides found on cell surfaces and in
`the surrounding extracellular matrix. GAGs participate in and regulate many cellular events
`and physiological and pathophysiological processes, such as cell proliferation and
`differentiation, cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, viral infection through their interaction
`with different proteins [1-3]. GAGs are divided into four main categories: hyaluronic acid, or
`hyaluronan (HA), chondroitin/dermatan sulfate, N-acetylheparosan (NAH)/heparan sulfate/
`heparin, and keratan sulfate, based on their monosaccharide composition and the configuration
`and position of the glycosidic bonds between these monosaccharides. The specificity of the
`interactions between GAGs and proteins results from structural diversity of GAGs defined by
`their size, saccharide composition and sequence, charge density [4,5]. Thus, understanding the
`structure of a GAG is essential in understanding its activity and biological functions. HA and
`NAH are biosynthesized by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. HA is co-polymer linked
`polymer of β-1,4 D-glucuronic acid (GlcA) and β-1,3 D-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc). [6]
`
`* Corresponding author, Phone: 518-276-3404, Fax: 518-276-3405, Email: Linhar@rpi.edu.
`#These authors contributed equally to this work
`Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
`we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting
`proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could
`affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 1
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 2
`
`NAH is a co-polymer of β-1,4 GlcA and α-1,4 GlcNAc and the biosynthetic precursor of the
`mammalian GAGs, heparin and heparan sulfate [7]. HA can be prepared by bacterial
`fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus [8], or enzymatically using biosynthetic enzymes
`prepared from Pasturella multocida [9]. Bacteria use HA as camouflage to enhance their ability
`to infect higher animals [10]. Similarly, Escherichia coli strain K5 produces capsular
`polysaccharide comprised of NAH [11]. NAH is also important as it represents a considerable
`portion of the sequence of mammalian heparan sulfate [12,13]. HA and NAH are the two
`simplest GAGs since neither have sulfo groups and, thus, consist of only a single sequence
`(Figure 1). HA and NAH have very similar structures, differing only in the position of their
`glycosidic linkage between GlcA and GlcNAc. This difference in structure results from very
`different biosynthesis pathways for HA and NAH [14-17] and gives each polysaccharide
`unique biological functions and distinctive structure-activity relationships [18].
`
`The oligosaccharides prepared from GAGs, by controlled enzymatic depolymerization, are
`often studied to define the minimum structural requirements for biological activity [19,20].
`ESI-MS is particularly useful to monitor these GAG-derived oligosaccharides due to its soft
`ionization [21,22]. LC-ESI-MS, relying on reversed-phase ion-pairing (RPIP)-high
`performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), has employed volatile ion-pairing reagents [23,
`24] to successfully analyze HA and NAH [25]. Unfortunately, this method results in nearly
`identical retention times for the HA and NAH oligosaccharides and since they have identical
`masses, it is not possible to differentiate these oligosaccharides. Most laboratories routinely
`rely on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, requiring relatively large amounts
`of samples, to distinguish HA and NAH oligosaccharides [26,27]. These two series of
`oligosaccharides can also be differentiated based on their susceptibilities to specific
`polysaccharide degrading enzymes, where the degradation can be detected by ultraviolet
`spectroscopy (UV), HPLC, thin layer chromatography (TLC), polyacrylamide gel
`electrophoresis or change in viscosity. A new method, which could confirm the identity of
`polysaccharide made by small samples of new isolates containing both HA and NAH, would
`be useful.
`
`Tandem mass spectrometry offers a sensitive and more readily available alternative to NMR
`for the analysis of GAG oligosaccharides. ESI tandem MS has been previously used to analyze
`HA oligosaccharides and glycosidic fragment ions were previously observed with single or
`multiple charges [28,29]. Unfortunately, these fragment ions would be expected to form from
`both HA and NAH oligosaccharides.
`
`This article describes a method for distinguishing HA and NAH oligosaccharide mixtures
`prepared by partial enzymatic digestion. RPIP-LC-ESI-MS, and tandem MS are applied to
`analyze these oligosaccharides and distinguish HA and NAH oligosaccharides based on the
`relative abundance of their characteristic fragment ions.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Preparation of oligosaccharides mixture
`N-acetylheparosan (NAH) was isolated through fermentation of E. coli K5 and purified as
`previously described [11]. The NAH 500 μg/50 μl was incubated in 50 mM sodium phosphate
`buffer pH 7.0 with heparin lyase III (10 m-units, Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO, U.S.A.) at
`37°C for 10 h with aliquots removed at various time points for analysis. The aliquots were
`heated in a boiling water bath for 10 min. to halt the reaction. The denatured protein was
`removed by centrifugation at 12000 × g for 10 min. Hyaluronic acid (HA, from rooster comb)
`was purchased from Sigma. Chondroitin lyase ABC (5 m-units, Seikagaku Biochemical,
`Tokyo, Japan) was used to digest HA (500 μg/50 μl) in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH
`7.0 at 37°C for 10 h and aliquots were removed periodically and collected as described above.
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 2
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 3
`
`TLC conditions
`The progress of the enzymatic depolymerization was monitored by measuring the HA and
`NAH oligosaccharides present in aliquots taken throughout the reaction by TLC on a precoated
`silica gel-60 aluminum plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) (1 × 5 cm) or (10 cm × 5 cm)
`eluted with a solvent system consisting of n-butanol/formic acid/water, 4:8:1 (v/v). The eluted
`plate was stained by dipping in a reagent containing 1 ml of 37.5% HCl, 2 ml of aniline, 10 ml
`of 85% H3PO3, 100 ml of ethyl acetate and 2 g diphenylamine) for 3 sec and heating at 150 °
`C for 10 sec. [30].
`
`LC-MS/MS
`
`LC MS analyses were performed on Agilent 1100 LC/MSD instrument (Agilent Technologies,
`Inc. Wilmington, DE, U.S.A.) equipped with an ion trap, binary pump and a UV detector. The
`column was a 5 μm Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 (0.5 × 250 mm) from Agilent Technologies. Eluent
`A was water/acetonitrile (85:15), v/v and eluent B was water/acetonitrile (35:65) v/v. Both
`eluents contained 12 mM tributylamine (TBA) and 38 mM NH4OAc and their pH was adjusted
`to 6.5 with HOAc. The product mixtures of the HA and NAH enzyme digestions were each
`diluted 10-fold with water and 1 μl of the resulting analytes were individually injected by auto-
`sampler. A gradient of 0% B for 15 min, and 0-100% B over 85 min. was used at a flow rate
`of 10 μl/min. Mass spectra were obtained using an Agilent 1100 series Classic G2445D LC/
`MSD trap (Agilent Technologies, Inc. Wilmington, DE, U.S.A.). The electrospray interface
`was set in negative ionization mode with the skimmer potential -40.0 V, capillary exit -120 .5
`V and a source temperature of 325 °C to obtain maximum abundance of the ions in a full scan
`spectra (150–1500 Da, 10 full scans/s). Nitrogen was used as a drying (5 liters/min) and
`nebulizing gas (20 p.s.i.). Auto MS/MS was turned on in these experiments using an estimated
`cycle time of 0.07 min. Total ion chromatograms (TIC) and mass spectra were processed using
`Data Analysis 2.0 (Bruker software).
`
`Results and Discussion
`Chondroitin lyase ABC was used to digest HA and heparin lyase III was used to digest NAH
`and both digestions were carried out to ~30% completion. The extent of digestion, reflected in
`the value “m” (at 100 % digestion m = 0) was monitored by TLC (Figure 2A). The
`oligosaccharides resulting from HA had the general structure ΔUA (1[→3) GlcNAc (1→4)
`GlcA (1→3]m) GlcNAc (ΔUA, 4-deoxy-α-L-threo-hex-4-enopyranosyluronic acid, m =
`0,1,2…). The oligosaccharides resulting from NAH had the general structure ΔUA (1[→4)
`GlcNAc (1→4) GlcA (1→4]m) GlcNAc.
`Next, LC-ESI-MS analysis was performed on HA and NAH oligosaccharides obtained at 30%
`reaction completion (Figure 2B and C). Peaks corresponding to a degree of polymerization
`(dp) from 2 to 20 were observed in the mass spectra of both HA and NAH oligosaccharides
`(Table 1). The ESI-MS spectra of HA and NAH oligosaccharides were identical across a range
`of dp values. For example, the largest oligosaccharides from HA and NAH (dp 20) afforded a
`calculated mass of 3791.1 based on the fully protonated acidic form. The mass spectra of both
`showed identical multiply charged molecular-ion peaks [M-5H]5- and [M-4H]4- at m/z 757.3
`and 946.9, respectively (Figure 3), confirming a length of 20 saccharide units.
`
`Tandem mass spectrometry can result in both glycosidic linkage and cross-ring cleavages. All
`product ions are labeled according to the Domon and Costello nomenclature. [31] The cross-
`ring cleavages hold the key in distinguishing HA and NAH oligosaccharides. Tandem mass
`spectra of the smallest products, the two disaccharides (dp2) from HA and NAH, were
`examined to see if they could be distinguished (Figure 2A and B). Tandem MS, on the singly-
`charged precursor at m/z 378.1, afforded a cross-ring cleavage ion fragment 0,2A2 at m/z 276.9
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 3
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 4
`
`in both the HA and NAH disaccharides but also a unique ion fragment 0,2A2-h at m/z 258.9 in
`the spectrum of NAH disaccharide, corresponding to a loss of H2O from 0,2A2 (Figure 4).
`The tandem mass spectra of two tetrasaccharides (dp4) were next examined (Figure 5 A and
`B) to determine whether this unique fragment could be used to distinguish oligosaccharides
`derived HA and NAH. Glycosidic cleavage fragment ions were observed, from the singly
`charged the precursors molecular ions at m/z 757.1, for both HA and NAH tetrasaccharides.
`Again, the cross-ring cleavage ion fragments 0,2A2-h m/z 258.9 and 0,2A4-h m/z 638.1 were
`observed only in the NAH. When the tandem MS was performed on the doubly charged
`molecular ions of the two hexasaccharides (dp6) at m/z 576.8 (Figure 6A and B), the fragments
`observed were similar to those observed in the tandem mass spectra of the dp 4 [M-H]-
`precursor. In addition to the glycosidic cleavage ion fragments, observed in tandem mass
`spectra of both HA and NAH hexasaccharides, A-type ion
`fragments 0,2A2, 0,2A4, 0,2A6, 0,2A2-h, 0,2A4-h and 0,2A6-h were also observed in the tandem
`mass spectrum of the NAH hexasaccharide. The 0,2A6 and 0,2A6-h fragments were mainly
`observed as doubly charged ions at m/z 517.1 and m/z 508.1, respectively. Cross-ring cleavage
`ion fragments were not observed in spectrum of HA hexasacchrides. In the spectra of HA
`tetrasaccharide and hexasaccharide, the relative intensities of fragment ions were different. In
`the spectrum of HA hexasaccharide, the C3 fragment ion at m/z 554.1 is of much lower intensity
`than the C3 fragment ion in the spectrum of HA tetrasaccharide (Figures 5A and 6A). The
`C4/Z4 fragment ion at m/z 757.2 dominates the spectrum of NAH hexasaccharide, while all
`the peaks in the spectrum of NAH tetrasaccharide are of similar relative intensities (Figure 5B
`and 6B). These differences between tetrasaccharide and hexasaccharides would appear to
`suggest that the charge state influences the product ion pattern. All ion fragments in the tandem
`mass spectra of dp2 to dp12, derived from HA and NAH, are presented in Table 2 and Table
`3, respectively. Tandem MS was performed on singly or multiply charged molecular ions
`(labeled with asterisks in Table 1). 0,2A-type ion fragments were observed in the GlcNAc
`residue of NAH oligosaccharides, but were not observed in the GlcNAc residues of HA
`oligosaccharides. The larger oligosaccharides of HA and NAH from dp14 to dp20 shown in
`the TIC (Figure 2) have a similar fragmentation to that of smaller oligosaccharides, dp2 to dp
`12, in which the difference between HA and NAH also could be observed (data not shown).
`Interestingly, only dp 2 of HA gave an 0,2A fragment (but not an 0,2A-h fragment),
`making 0,2A-h fragment a unique marker for NAH.
`
`Ion fragments, of the 0,2A-type observed in the NAH GlcNAc residues, containing 1→4 linkage
`suggest the fragmentation mechanism is a retro-aldol rearrangement of oligosaccharide ions
`in the negative mode [32-35]. This mechanism requires an open-ring reducing terminal
`aldehyde, and such structures are formed by C-type fragmentation [34-38]. The 0,2An (n=even
`number) ions formed from cross-ring cleavage to the internal glucosamine residues are
`therefore likely to arise from the Cn (n=even number) ions by retro-aldol rearrangement. These
`A-type fragment ions are observed in residues that are 4- or 6- linked [21,34,36-42].
`Furthermore, in NAH oligosaccharides, the free hydroxy group at position 3 can accept a proton
`from position 4 after cleavage of the GlcNAc ring by 0,2A type fragmentation (Figure 7)
`affording water and the negatively charged 0,2An-h fragment. These dehydrated A-type
`fragment ions also are observed with the residue requiring an unsubstituted hydroxyl in the 3-
`position in other oligosaccharides [34,36,39,43]. In the HA oligosaccharides, the bonds at C-3
`of GlcNAc are substituted perhaps making these more stable than NAH oligosaccharides. The
`exception to this rule is dp2 from HA, where the 0,2A2 ion fragment is observed. This may
`result from the small size of the dp 2 molecule, preventing it from dissipating vibrational
`energy, resulting in its fragmentation. Despite its small size, the HA disaccharide still fails to
`afford a 0,2An-h fragment ion because of its substitution at position 3. Here, the presence
`of 0,2A-type fragment ions can be used as a diagnostic tool to distinguish HA disaccharide from
`longer HA oligosaccharides, in cases where the charge state is unknown.
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 4
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 5
`
`In conclusion, the current study clearly demonstrates LC-MS/MS can be used to differentiate
`HA and NAH oligosaccharides. The sensitivity of this method is better than 100 ng for each
`oligosaccharide separated using RPIP-HPLC. A-type fragment ions from GlcNAc residues
`were shown as diagnostic peaks in MS/MS spectra of NAH oligosaccharides, but not in the
`spectra of HA oligosaccharides. One exception was an 0,2A2 ion fragment observed for the
`disaccharide from HA. This approach should be useful for screening the capsules of bacterial
`isolates to determine whether they are composed of HA or NAH polysaccharides. This method
`might also be useful in distinguishing between small quantities of HA and NAH derived
`oligosaccharides isolated from animal tissues. This method should also be useful as a
`complement approach to confirm the structure of unsulfated chondrointin oligosaccharides that
`have the same linkage pattern as HA, containing 3-linked HexNAc residues.
`
`Acknowledgements
`The authors thank Tatiana Laremore for her careful reading of this manuscript and the NIH for supporting this research
`through grants GM38060 and HL62244.
`
`References
`1. Wu ZL, Zhang L, Beeler DL, Kuberan B, Rosenberg RD. A new strategy for defining critical functional
`groups on heparan sulfate. FASEB J 2002;16:539–545. [PubMed: 11919156]
`2. Capila I, Linhardt RJ. Heparin-protein interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002;41:391–412.
`[PubMed: 12491369]
`3. Bernfield M, Gotte M, Park PW, Reizes O, Fitzgerald ML, Lincecum J, Zako M. Functions of cell
`surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu Rev Biochem 1999;68:729–777. [PubMed: 10872465]
`4. Taylor KR, Gallo RL. Glycosaminoglycans and their proteoglycans: host-associated molecular patterns
`for initiation and modulation of inflammation. FASEB J 2006;20:9–22. [PubMed: 16394262]
`5. Sasisekharan R, Raman R, Prabhakar V. Glycomics approach to structure-function relationships of
`glycosaminoglycans. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2006;8:181–231. [PubMed: 16834555]
`6. Meyer K. The mucopolysaccharides of the interfibrillar substance of the mesenchyme. Ann N Y Acad
`Sci 1950;52:961–963. [PubMed: 15426109]
`7. Lindahl U, Kusche-Gullberg M, Kjellen L. Regulated diversity of heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem
`1998;273:24979–24982. [PubMed: 9737951]
`8. DeAngelis PL, Papaconstantinou J, Weigel PH. Molecular cloning, identification, and sequence of the
`hyaluronan synthase gene from group A Streptococcus pyogenes. J Biol Chem 1993;268:19181–
`19184. [PubMed: 8366070]
`9. Widner B, Behr R, Von Dollen S, Tang M, Heu T, Sloma A, Sternberg D, Deangelis PL, Weigel PH,
`Brown S. Hyaluronic acid production in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:3747–
`3752. [PubMed: 16000785]
`10. ESSLINGER J, SELEIM RS, BLOBEL H. Adhesion of Pasteurella multocida to HeLa cells and to
`macrophages of different animal species. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire 1994;145:49–53.
`11. Vann WF, Schmidt MA, Jann B, Jann K. The structure of the capsular polysaccharide (K5 antigen)
`of urinary-tract-infective Escherichia coli 010:K5:H4. A polymer similar to desulfo-heparin. Eur J
`Biochem 1981;116:359–364. [PubMed: 7018909]
`12. Murphy KJ, Merry CL, Lyon M, Thompson JE, Roberts IS, Gallagher JT. A new model for the domain
`structure of heparan sulfate based on the novel specificity of K5 lyase. J Biol Chem 2004;279:27239–
`27245. [PubMed: 15047699]
`13. Born J, Jann K, Assmann KJ, Lindahl U, Berden JH. N-Acetylated domains in heparan sulfates
`revealed by a monoclonal antibody against the Escherichia coli K5 capsular polysaccharide.
`Distribution of the cognate epitope in normal human kidney and transplant kidney with chronic
`vascular rejection. J Biol Chem 1996;271:22802–22809. [PubMed: 8798457]
`14. Razi N, Feyzi E, Bjork I, Naggi A, Casu B, Lindahl U. Structural and functional properties of heparin
`analogues obtained by chemical sulphation of Escherichia coli K5 capsular polysaccharide. Biochem
`J 1995;309(Pt 2):465–472. [PubMed: 7626010]
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 5
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 6
`
`15. Lindahl U, Li JP, Kusche-Gullberg M, Salmivirta M, Alaranta S, Veromaa T, Emeis J, Roberts I,
`Taylor C, Oreste P, Zoppetti G, Naggi A, Torri G, Casu B. Generation of “neoheparin” from E.
`coli K5 capsular polysaccharide. J Med Chem 2005;48:349–352. [PubMed: 15658847]
`16. Leali D, Belleri M, Urbinati C, Coltrini D, Oreste P, Zoppetti G, Ribatti D, Rusnati M, Presta M.
`Fibroblast growth factor-2 antagonist activity and angiostatic capacity of sulfated Escherichia coli
`K5 polysaccharide derivatives. J Biol Chem 2001;276:37900–37908. [PubMed: 11473122]
`17. Kuberan B, Beeler DL, Lawrence R, Lech M, Rosenberg RD. Rapid two-step synthesis of mitrin
`from heparosan: a replacement for heparin. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:12424–12425. [PubMed:
`14531682]
`18. Banerji S, Wright AJ, Noble M, Mahoney DJ, Campbell ID, Day AJ, Jackson DG. Structures of the
`Cd44-hyaluronan complex provide insight into a fundamental carbohydrate-protein interaction. Nat
`Struct Mol Biol 2007;14:234–239. [PubMed: 17293874]
`19. Seyfried NT, McVey GF, Almond A, Mahoney DJ, Dudhia J, Day AJ. Expression and purification
`of functionally active hyaluronan-binding domains from human cartilage link protein, aggrecan and
`versican: formation of ternary complexes with defined hyaluronan oligosaccharides. J Biol Chem
`2005;280:5435–5448. [PubMed: 15590670]
`20. Blundell CD, Mahoney DJ, Almond A, DeAngelis PL, Kahmann JD, Teriete P, Pickford AR,
`Campbell ID, Day AJ. The link module from ovulation- and inflammation-associated protein TSG-6
`changes conformation on hyaluronan binding. J Biol Chem 2003;278:49261–49270. [PubMed:
`12972412]
`21. Zaia J. Mass spectrometry of oligosaccharides. Mass Spectrom Rev 2004;23:161–227. [PubMed:
`14966796]
`22. Chi L, Amster J, Linhardt RJ. Mass spectrometry for the analysis of highly charged sulfated
`carbohydrate. Current Anal Chem 2005;1:223–240.
`23. Storm T, Reemtsma T, Jekel M. Use of volatile amines as ion-pairing agents for the high-performance
`liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric determination of aromatic sulfonates in
`industrial wastewater. J Chromatogr A 1999;854:175–185. [PubMed: 10497938]
`24. Guan F, Ishii A, Seno H, Watanabe-Suzuki K, Kumazawa T, Suzuki O. Use of an ion-pairing reagent
`for high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass
`spectrometry determination of anionic anticoagulant rodenticides in body fluids. J Chromatogr B
`Biomed Sci Appl 1999;731:155–165. [PubMed: 10492002]
`25. Kuberan B, Lech M, Zhang L, Wu ZL, Beeler DL, Rosenberg RD. Analysis of heparan sulfate
`oligosaccharides with ion pair-reverse phase capillary high performance liquid chromatography-
`microelectrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:8707–
`8718. [PubMed: 12121115]
`26. Minamisawa T, Suzuki K, Kajimoto N, Iida M, Maeda H, Hirabayashi J. Microscale preparation of
`even- and odd-numbered N-acetylheparosan oligosaccharides. Carbohydr Res 2006;341:230–237.
`[PubMed: 16330006]
`27. Blundell CD, Reed MA, Almond A. Complete assignment of hyaluronan oligosaccharides up to
`hexasaccharides. Carbohydr Res 2006;341:2803–2815. [PubMed: 17056022]
`28. Kuhn AV, Ruttinger HH, Neubert RH, Raith K. Identification of hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides
`by direct coupling of capillary electrophoresis with electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry. Rapid
`Commun Mass Spectrom 2003;17:576–582. [PubMed: 12621620]
`29. Kuhn AV, Raith K, Sauerland V, Neubert RH. Quantification of hyaluronic acid fragments in
`pharmaceutical formulations using LC-ESI-MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2003;30:1531–1537.
`[PubMed: 12467925]
`30. Zhang Z, Yu G, Zhao X, Liu H, Guan H, Lawson AM, Chai W. Sequence analysis of alginate-derived
`oligosaccharides by negative-ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom
`2006;17:621–630. [PubMed: 16503152]
`31. Domon B, Costello CE. A systematic nomenclature for carbohydrate fragmentations in FAB-MS/MS
`spectra of glycoconjugates. Glycoconj J 1988;5:397–409.
`32. Spengler B, Dolce JW, Cotter RJ. Infrared-Laser Desorption Mass-Spectrometry of Oligosaccharides
`—Fragmentation Mechanisms and Isomer Analysis. Anal Chem 1990;62:1731–1737.
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 6
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 7
`
`33. Dallinga JW, Heerma W. Reaction mechanism and fragment ion structure determination of
`deprotonated small oligosaccharides, studied by negative ion fast atom bombardment (tandem) mass
`spectrometry. Biol Mass Spectrom 1991;20:215–231. [PubMed: 2054395]
`34. Zaia J, Miller MJ, Seymour JL, Costello CE. The role of mobile protons in negative ion CID of
`oligosaccharides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2007;18:952–960. [PubMed: 17383193]
`35. Von Seggern CE, Zarek PE, Cotter RJ. Fragmentation of sialylated carbohydrates using infrared
`atmospheric pressure MALDI ion trap mass spectrometry from cation-doped liquid matrixes. Anal
`Chem 2003;75:6523–6530. [PubMed: 16465690]
`36. Chai W, Piskarev V, Lawson AM. Negative-ion electrospray mass spectrometry of neutral
`underivatized oligosaccharides. Anal Chem 2001;73:651–657. [PubMed: 11217777]
`37. Pfenninger A, Karas M, Finke B, Stahl B. Structural analysis of underivatized neutral human milk
`oligosaccharides in the negative ion mode by nano-electrospray MS(n) (part 1: methodology). J Am
`Soc Mass Spectrom 2002;13:1331–1340. [PubMed: 12443024]
`38. Pfenninger A, Karas M, Finke B, Stahl B. Structural analysis of underivatized neutral human milk
`oligosaccharides in the negative ion mode by nano-electrospray MS(n) (part 2: application to isomeric
`mixtures). J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2002;13:1341–1348. [PubMed: 12443025]
`39. Chai W, Piskarev V, Lawson AM. Branching pattern and sequence analysis of underivatized
`oligosaccharides by combined MS/MS of singly and doubly charged molecular ions in negative-ion
`electrospray mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2002;13:670–679. [PubMed: 12056567]
`40. Harvey DJ. Fragmentation of negative ions from carbohydrates: part 3. Fragmentation of hybrid and
`complex N-linked glycans. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2005;16:647–659. [PubMed: 15862766]
`41. Harvey DJ. Fragmentation of negative ions from carbohydrates: part 2. Fragmentation of high-
`mannose N-linked glycans. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2005;16:631–646. [PubMed: 15862765]
`42. Saad OM, Myers RA, Castleton DL, Leary JA. Analysis of hyaluronan content in chondroitin sulfate
`preparations by using selective enzymatic digestion and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
`Anal Biochem 2005;344:232–239. [PubMed: 16081034]
`43. Zhang Y, Kariya Y, Conrad AH, Tasheva ES, Conrad GW. Analysis of keratan sulfate
`oligosaccharides by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2005;77:902–
`910. [PubMed: 15679360]
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 7
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 8
`
`Figure 1.
`Structure of HA and NAH.
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 8
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 9
`
`Figure 2.
`Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of HA oligosaccharides (A). TLC analysis of NAH
`oligosaccharides (B). TIC of NAH oligosaccharides (C).
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 9
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 10
`
`Figure 3.
`ESI mass spectra of dp20 of HA (A) and NAH (B).
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 10
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 11
`
`Figure 4.
`MS/MS spectra of disaccharides (dp2) from HA (A) and NAH (B).
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 11
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 12
`
`Figure 5.
`MS/MS spectra of tetrasaccharides (dp4) from HA (A) and NAH (B).
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 12
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 13
`
`Figure 6.
`MS/MS spectra of hexasaccharides (dp6) from HA (A) and NAH (B).
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 13
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 14
`
`757.3
`681.5
`
`947.2*
`852.2*
`757.4*
`
`1136.9
`1010.3
`883.8*
`757.3*
`630.9
`
`1326.8
`1136.8
`946.8*
`757.2*
`567.8*
`
`[M-5H]5-
`
`[M-4H]4-
`
`[M-3H]3-
`
`[M-2H]2-
`
`1136.3
`757.1*
`378.1*
`
`[M-H]-
`
`757.2
`
`[2M-H]-
`
`Fragments marked were used as precursor ions in tandem MS.
`
`*
`
`3791.1
`3412.0
`3032.9
`2653.8
`2274.7
`1895.5
`1516.4
`1137.3
`758.2
`379.1
`
`Calculated mass
`
`dp20
`dp18
`dp16
`dp14
`dp12
`dp10
`dp8
`dp6
`dp4
`dp2
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Major molecular ions observed in the ESI mass spectra of HA and NAH oligosaccharides.
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Table 1
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 14
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 15
`
`775.2
`978.3
`1154.3
`1375.4
`
`757.2
`933.2
`1136.3
`1312.3
`757.1
`845.6
`947.2
`1035.5
`915.2
`1118.3
`1294.3
`1497.3
`
`775.2
`978.3
`1154.3
`1375.4
`
`757.2
`933.2
`1136.3
`1312.3
`757.2
`845.5
`
`739.1
`915.2
`1118.3
`1294.3
`1497.5
`
`599.1
`775.1
`978.3
`1154.3
`
`554.1
`757.1
`933.2
`1136.3
`1312.3/655.7
`
`536.8
`739.1
`915.2
`
`396.0
`599.1
`775.1
`978.2
`
`378.0
`554.1
`757..2
`933.2/466.1
`
`739.2
`915.2
`
`396.0
`599.1
`
`378.0
`554.1
`
`359.9
`536.1
`
`dp12
`
`dp10
`
`dp8
`
`dp6
`
`dp4
`
`276.9
`
`dp2
`
`dp =2 n
`
`*
`
`Yn-8
`Yn-7
`Yn-6
`Yn-5
`Yn-4
`Yn-3
`Yn-2
`Yn-1
`Cn-8/Zn-8
`Cn-7
`Cn-6/Zn-6
`Cn-5
`Cn-4/Zn-4
`Cn-3
`Cn-2/Zn-2
`Cn-1
`Bn-7
`Bn-6
`Bn-5
`Bn-4
`Bn-3
`Bn-2
`Bn-1
`0,2An-h
`0,2An *
`
`J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 January 1.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Fragment ions observed in the product-ion spectra of HA oligosaccharides
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Table 2
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ex. 2026, P. 15
`
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Ex. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IPR2015-01490
`
`

`
`Zhang et al.
`
`Page 16
`
`775.2
`978.3
`1154.3
`1375.4
`
`757.2
`933.2
`1136.3
`1312.3/656.1
`757.1
`845.8
`947.2
`
`536.1
`739.1
`915.2
`1118.2
`1294.3
`1497.4
`
`258.8
`276.8
`638.1
`656.1
`1017.1/508.1
`1035.1/517.1
`1396.4/697.7
`1414.4/706.6
`887.7
`896.7
`717.7
`723.7
`
`dp12
`
`775.2
`978.3
`1154.3
`1375.4
`
`757.2
`933.2
`1136.3
`1312.3/656.2
`757.2
`845.8
`
`536.1
`739.1
`915.2
`1118.3
`1294.3/646.2
`1497.4/748.8
`
`258.8
`276.8
`638.1
`656.1
`1017.1/508.1
`1035.1/517.1
`1396.4/697.7
`1414.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket