throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Holloway, Clay
`Rene Vazquez
`raymond joao; Kadaba, Wab; O"Reilly, Shayne; Steven W. Ritcheson (HGD Law Firm); Jackie Knapp Burt (HGD
`Law Firm); Joe Gleason; Maureen Abbey (HGD Law Firm); PG_JCMS
`RE: IPR 2015-01482
`Friday, July 31, 2015 4:13:33 PM
`
`Rene,

`To try to address these questions, please consider the following.

`With regard to your question regarding the metadata, as you know when a word document is
`opened the metadata changes.  That change in metadata was cause by my confirming that the
`document I was attaching was, in fact, what I represented to you it was.   If you would be willing to
`agree that our providing you with the cover email from the expert to our attorneys at 8pm on June
`23 would not constitute waiver of any applicable privilege or work product protection, I would be
`happy to show you that information. 

`Prior to yesterday, Petitioners had not served patent owner with the correct declaration because
`the error was discovered only shortly before I emailed you the request.

`Regarding authority on the replacement of exhibits, I would direct your attention to the PTAB’s
`decisions in ABB Inc v. Roy-G-BIV, 2013 WL 6907728; Schott Gemtron Corp. v. SSW Holding Co.,
`IPR2014-00367 Paper No. 30; and Syntroleum Corp. v. Neste Oil, 2013 WL 5970108.

`Regards,
`Clay

`Clay Holloway
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`Suite 2800 | 1100 Peachtree Street NE | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
`office 404 815 6537 | cell 770 778 6158 | fax 404 541 3484
`cholloway@kilpatricktownsend.com | My Profile | vCard
`
`From: Rene Vazquez [mailto:rvazquez@hgdlawfirm.com]
`Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 11:44 AM
`To: Holloway, Clay
`Cc: raymond joao; Kadaba, Wab; O'Reilly, Shayne; Steven W. Ritcheson (HGD Law Firm); Jackie Knapp
`Burt (HGD Law Firm); Joe Gleason; Maureen Abbey (HGD Law Firm); PG_JCMS
`Subject: Re: IPR 2015-01482
`
`Clay –
`
`In considering Petitioners’ request, JCMS would like some additional information.
`
`
`- When was the proposed substitute declaration for the 1482 IPR prepared and finalized?
`According to the metadata, the document attached to your email has a “last modified”
`date of 7/29 at 9:16 am, just before your email was sent. Is there some evidence
`Petitioners can provide demonstrating that the proposed substitute declaration was
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Patent Owner JCMS’s Exhibit No. 2010
`
`

`
`actually prepared and finalized on 6/23?
`
` Did Petitioners serve Mr. Joao with the proposed substitute declaration in the package
`provided to the USPS on 6/24, or did that service attempt include the wrong
`declaration as well? We will ask Mr. Joao this question when he returns from
`vacation, but in the meantime thought you might know the answer.
`
` Prior to yesterday, had petitioners ever previously served this proposed substitute
`declaration on JCMS?
`
` In your email yesterday, you state that “this type of clerical error has been corrected
`numerous times by the PTAB.” Please provide any and all authority supporting your
`statement.
`
` -
`
` -
`
` -
`
`
`Thanks in advance for the additional information.
`
`Regards,
`
`Rene
`
`
`On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Holloway, Clay
`<CHolloway@kilpatricktownsend.com> wrote:
`
`Rene,

`It has come to our attention that the same declaration was filed in both the 363 IPRs. 
`We recognize your objection to the June 23 filing date request, but write to request
`your consent to substitute the declaration in the 1482 with the attached.  In trying to
`file multiple IPRs, the wrong 363 declaration was submitted and this type of clerical
`error has been corrected numerous times by the PTAB.

`Regards,
`Clay

`<image001.gif>
`
`Clay Holloway
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`Suite 2800 | 1100 Peachtree Street NE | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
`office 404 815 6537 | cell 770 778 6158 | fax 404 541 3484
`cholloway@kilpatricktownsend.com | My Profile | vCard
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice:
`This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications
`Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of
`this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information
`and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any
`of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us
`immediately by return e-mail or at 404 815 6500, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Patent Owner JCMS’s Exhibit No. 2010
`
`

`
`reading or saving in any manner.
`
`***DISCLAIMER*** Per Treasury Department Circular 230: Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
`communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the
`purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
`another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
`<363 - French Expert Dec.docx>
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Patent Owner JCMS’s Exhibit No. 2010

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket