Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page1 of 11
`
`ANTON HANDAL (Bar No. 113812)
`PAMELA C. CHALK (Bar No. 216411)
`GABRIEL HEDRICK (Bar No. 220649)
`HANDAL & ASSOCIATES
`750 B Street, Suite 2510
`San Diego, California 92101
`Telephone:
`619.544.6400
`Facsimile:
`619.696.0323
`E-Mail:
`anh@handal-law.com
`pchalk@handal-law.com
`ghedrick@handal-law.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`E.DIGITAL CORPORATION
`
`STEFANI E. SHANBERG (State Bar No. 206717)
`JENNIFER J. SCHMIDT (State Bar No. 295579)
`MADELEINE E. GREENE (State Bar No. 263120)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`One Market Plaza
`Spear Tower, Suite 3300
`San Francisco, California 94105
`Telephone:
`(415) 947-2000
`Facsimile:
`(415) 947-2099
`E-Mail:
`sshanberg@wsgr.com
`jschmidt@wsgr.com
`mgreene@wsgr.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`DROPCAM, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CASE NO.: 3:14-cv-04922-JST
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND
`PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`(PATENT L.R. 4-3)
`
`Judge: Honorable Jon S. Tigar
`Ctrm: 9
`Hearing: August 3, 2015
`Time: 2:00 p.m.
`
`)))))))))))))
`
`E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DROPCAM, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page2 of 11
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4-3 and the Court’s February 5, 2015, Scheduling Order
`
`(“Scheduling Order”) (Doc. No. 43), and the Court’s July 31, 2015, Order Granting Leave To
`
`File Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement (Doc. No. 70), Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation
`
`(“Plaintiff” or “e.Digital”) and Defendant Dropcam, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Dropcam”) provide
`
`the following Amended Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement in the above-
`
`entitled matter for U.S. Patent Nos. 8,306,514 (“the ’514 patent”); 8,311,522 (“the ’522 patent”);
`
`8,311,523 (“the ’523 patent”); 8,311,524 (“the ’524 patent”); 8,315,618 (“the ’618 patent”); and
`
`8,315,619 (“the ’619 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).
`
`I.
`
`Agreed Upon Claim Constructions
`
`The parties have agreed upon the following constructions for each of the claim terms and
`
`phrases listed below.
`
`Claim Term or
`Phrase
`“being selectable to
`provide”
`“environment of the
`communication
`device”
`“social template”
`
`Agreed Upon Construction
`
`“capable of being selected to provide”
`
`“surroundings of the communication device within the detectable
`area of the communication device”
`
`“data structure associated with a social hierarchy and one or more
`social signatures”
`“social signature associated with a specific social template at the
`“unique social
`time of processing”
`signature”
`plain and ordinary meaning
`“optical sensor”
`“capable of desired processing”
`“accurate”
`II.
`Disputed Claim Constructions and Identification of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence
`
`The parties dispute the proper construction of certain claim terms. Below, Plaintiff and
`
`Defendant set forth each of the disputed claim terms, each party’s proposed construction of each
`
`disputed term, together with an identification of all references from the specification or
`
`prosecution history that support that construction, and an identification of any extrinsic evidence
`
`known to the party on which it intends to rely either to support its proposed construction or to
`
`oppose any other party’s proposed construction.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-1-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page3 of 11
`
`Claim Term or
`Phrase
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Defendant’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Supporting Evidence
`
`1.
`
`“social signature”
`
`“raw or processed data and/or
`other information based on
`sensors”
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specifications1
`Figures: 1, 2, 3
`’522 Specification: Abstract;
`1:29-58; 2:5-30; 2:66-3:7;
`3:19-60; 4:14-29; 4:65-5:6;
`5:19-6:3; 6:19-24; 7:4-65; 9:5-
`11:6; 11:16-14:34; 14:46-53;
`15:29-57; 16:14-26; 17:51-
`18:18; 18:22-24; 18:44-19:33;
`21:15-44; 22:41-67
`Claims
`’522 patent: 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 13,
`15, 17, 18, 22, 24
`’514 patent: 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
`18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 30, 34, 36
`’523 patent: 1, 2, 4, 10, 11,
`17, 19, 20, 21, 26
`’524 patent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10,
`15, 16, 17
`’618 patent: 1, 2, 6, 7, 11, 13,
`15, 16, 20, 22, 23, 24
`’619 patent: 1, 2, 4, 10, 11,
`
`“combination of sensor data
`indicative of a type of
`activity”
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification2
`Figures: 1, 2, 3
`’618 Specification: 9:23-29,
`14:31-41, 14:63-66, 15:38-45,
`15:45-51, 15:52-55, 16:15-24,
`17:30-36, 18:54-60, Tables 1
`and 2.
`Claims
`’514 patent: 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
`18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 30, 34, and
`36.
`’522 patent: 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 13,
`15, 17, 18, 22, and 24.
`’523 patent: 1, 2, 4, 10, 11,
`17, 19, 20, 21, and 26.
`’524 patent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10,
`15, 16, and 17.
`’618 patent: 1, 2, 6, 7, 11, 13,
`15, 16, 20, 22, 23, and 24.
`’619 patent: 1, 2, 4, 10, 11,
`17, 19, 20, 21, 26, 29, 30, and
`
`1 The specifications of each of the Asserted Patents contain word-for-word identical
`disclosures. For the sake of brevity and efficiency, Plaintiff cites specifically herein to the
`specification of the parent ’522 patent. However, Plaintiff represents and hereby notifies the
`Court and Defendant that Plaintiff intends to rely on the exact same disclosures contained in the
`’514 patent, ’523 patent, ’524 patent, ’618 patent and ’619 patent, which specifications, again,
`contain exactly the same disclosures as the specification of the ’522 patent.
`2 All supporting patent citations identified by Defendant Dropcam herein reference the
`specification of U.S. Patent No. 8,315,618. Dropcam reserves the right to rely upon
`corresponding disclosures contained in the specifications of each of the Asserted Patents.
`Dropcam similarly reserves the right to rely upon disclosures contained in the prosecution
`histories of each of the Asserted Patents corresponding to the citations identified herein.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-2-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page4 of 11
`
`31.
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Sworn testimony of Dr. Earl
`Sacerdoti.
`
`“ordered ranking of social
`groups defined within each
`social template”
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification:
`Figures: 1, 2, 3
`’618 Specification: 4:17-23,
`6:12-21, 14:44-50, 15:13-16,
`15:18-31, 15:45-51, 16:28-51,
`17:4-12, 17:30-36, 17:13-16,
`17:45-51, 18:23-28, and
`Tables 1 and 2.
`Claims
`’514 patent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10,
`14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 26, 30,
`34, and 36.
`’522 patent: 1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 12,
`17, 19, 23, 25, and 26.
`’523 patent: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
`19, and 22.
`’524 patent: 1, 5, and 6.
`’618 patent: l, 3, 6, 9, 10, 15,
`17, 20, and 22.
`’619 patent: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
`19, 22, and 31.
`
`2.
`
`“social hierarchy”
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`17, 19, 20, 21, 26, 29, 30, 31
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`The American Heritage
`Dictionary (Fifth Ed. 2012)
`(hereinafter referred to as
`“AHD”) at pp. 217 (“data”),
`435 (“information”)
`Barron’s Dictionary of
`Computer and Internet Terms
`(Eleventh Ed. 2013)
`(hereinafter referred to as
`“BDCIT”) at p. 124 (“data”)
`Sworn testimony of the
`inventor, Patrick Nunally
`
`“an arrangement of persons,
`things, information and/or
`operations in a series of
`levels”
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification:
`Figures: 3
`’522 Specification: Abstract;
`1:29-47; 1:59-2:4; 2:31-65;
`3:24-42; 3:63-4:64; 5:34-59;
`6:4-17; 6:36-7:3; 7:38-53;
`8:10-34; 11:1-6; 14:4-45;
`15:4-17:24; 17:44-50; 18:22-
`36; 20:13-21:44; 22:41-67
`Claims
`’522 patent: 1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 12,
`17, 19, 23, 25, 26
`’514 patent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10,
`14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 26, 30,
`34, 36
`’523 patent: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
`19, 22
`’524 patent: 1, 5, 6
`’618 patent: 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 15,
`17, 20, 22
`’619 patent: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
`-3-
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page5 of 11
`
`3.
`
`“sensor value
`range”
`
`19, 22, 31
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`AHD at 398 (“hierarchy”)
`Sworn testimony of the
`inventor, Patrick Nunally
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`or, alternatively, “information
`representing sensor data
`above, below or between a
`value(s)”
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`’522 Specification: 15:43-57;
`16:14-26; 22:41-67
`Claims
`’522 patent: 1, 8, 17
`’514 patent: 1, 5, 10, 14, 21,
`26, 30, 34, 36
`’523 patent: 1, 4, 19, 21
`’524 patent: 1, 3
`’618 patent: 1, 6, 15, 20, 22
`’619 patent: 1, 4, 19, 21, 29
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`AHD at p. 751 (“sensor”)
`MWD at pp. 596 (“range”),
`656 (“sensor”), 797-798
`(“value”)
`BDCIT at p. 406 (“range”)
`
`File History
`U.S. Patent & Trademark
`Office Prosecution Proceeding
`No. 13/047,163 for U.S.
`Patent No. 8,315,618 -
`Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in
`an Amendment at pp. 3-5,
`March 16, 2012.
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Chambers Concise Dictionary
`at p. 562 [DROPCAM_
`EDTL 00001055].
`Sworn testimony of Dr. Earl
`Sacerdoti.
`
`“range of measurements
`between two values”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`Figures: 1, 2, 3
`’618 Specification: 4:24-28,
`9:41-46, 11:62-65, 12:6-13,
`16:15-24, 19:22-26, 15:38-45,
`and Tables 1 and 2.
`Claims
`’514 patent: 1, 5, 10, 14, 21,
`26, 30, 34, and 36.
`’522 patent: 1, 8, and 17.
`’523 patent: 1, 4, 19, and 21.
`’524 patent: 1 and 3.
`’618 patent: 1, 6, 15, 20, and
`22.
`’619 patent: 1, 4, 19, 21, and
`29.
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Sworn testimony of Dr. Earl
`Sacerdoti.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-4-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page6 of 11
`
`“a report about a single event
`that results from comparison
`of sensor data with social
`templates”
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`Figures: 1, 2, 3
`’618 Specification: at 1:15-20,
`2:40-47, 3:52-55, 4:17-23,
`6:12-21, 10:46-49, 11:13-17,
`14:32-41, 14:44-50, 14:63-66,
`16:24-27, 15:13-16, 15:18-31,
`16:28-51, 17:4-12, 17:30-36,
`17:13-16, 17:45-51, 18:23-28,
`17:45-51, 18:54-60, 18:64-
`19:4, and Tables 1 and 2.
`Claims
`’514 patent: 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
`10, 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24,
`25, 26, 30, 34, and 36.
`’522 patent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9,
`11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 23, 25, and
`26.
`’523 patent: 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 19,
`20, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26.
`’524 patent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
`8, 9, and 10.
`’618 patent: 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9,
`10, 15, 16, 17, 20, and 22.
`’619 patent: 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 19,
`20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, and
`30.
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Sworn testimony of Dr. Earl
`Sacerdoti.
`
`“send/sends/sending
`information in varying levels
`of granularity”
`
`Sworn testimony of the
`inventor, Patrick Nunally
`
`4.
`
`“information”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`Figures: 3
`’522 Specification: Abstract;
`1:29-47; 1:59-2:4; 2:31-65;
`3:24-42; 3:63-4:64; 5:34-59;
`6:4-17; 6:36-7:3; 7:38-53;
`8:10-34; 11:1-6; 14:4-45;
`15:4-17:24; 17:44-50; 18:22-
`36; 20:13-21:44; 22:41-67
`Claims
`’522 patent: 1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 12,
`17, 19, 23, 25, 26
`’514 patent: 14, 18, 20, 21,
`22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 34, 36
`’523 patent: 1, 3, 10, 19, 22,
`23, 24, 25, 26
`’524 patent: 1, 2, 3, 10
`’618 patent: 1, 3, 6, 9, 15, 16,
`20, 22
`’619 patent: 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 19,
`22, 23, 24, 25, 26
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`AHD at p. 435 (“information”)
`MWD at p. 372
`(“information”)
`Sworn testimony of the
`inventor, Patrick Nunally
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`5.
`
`“provide/
`provides/
`providing
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-5-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page7 of 11
`
`differing levels of
`information”
`
`6.
`
`“provided…/
`provides/
`providing an
`update”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`Figures: 3
`’522 Specification: Abstract;
`1:29-47; 1:59-2:4; 2:31-65;
`3:24-42; 3:63-4:64; 5:34-59;
`6:4-17; 6:36-7:3; 7:38-53;
`8:10-34; 11:1-6; 14:4-45;
`15:4-17:24; 17:44-50; 18:22-
`36; 20:13-21:44; 22:41-67
`Claims
`’522 patent: 1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 12,
`17, 19, 23, 25, 26
`’514 patent: 1, 5, 10, 14, 20,
`21, 26, 30, 34, 36
`’523 patent: 1, 3, 5, 19, 22
`’524 patent: 1, 6
`’618 patent: 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 15,
`17, 20, 22
`’619 patent: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
`19, 22
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`AHD at pp. 239 (“differ,”
`“different”), 435
`(“information”), 483 (“level”),
`671 (“provide”)
`MWD at pp. 200 (“differ,”
`“different”), 372
`(“information”), 414 (“level”)
`Sworn testimony of the
`inventor, Patrick Nunally
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`’522 Specification: Abstract;
`1:29-47; 1:59-2:4; 2:31-65;
`3:24-42; 3:63-4:64; 5:34-59;
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`Figures: 1, 2, 3
`’618 Specification: at 1:15-20,
`2:40-47, 3:52-55, 4:17-23,
`6:12-21, 10:46-49, 14:32-41,
`14:44-50, 14:55-62, 17:45-51,
`18:23-28, 15:13- 16, 15:18-
`31, 16:28-51, 17:4-12, 17:30-
`36, 17:13-16, and Tables 1
`and 2.
`Claims
`’514 patent: 1, 5, 10, 14, 21,
`26, 30, 34, and 36.
`’522 patent: 1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 12,
`17, 19, 23, 25, and 26.
`’523 patent: 1, 3, 5, 19, and
`22.
`’524 patent: 1 and 6.
`’618 patent: 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 15,
`17, 20, and 22.
`’619 patent: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
`19, and 22.
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Sworn testimony of Dr. Earl
`Sacerdoti.
`
`“sent/sends/sending
`information indicating a
`user’s status”
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`Specification
`Figures: 1, 2, 3
`’618 Specification: at 1:15-20,
`2:40-47, 3:52-55, 4:17-23,
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-6-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page8 of 11
`
`6:4-17; 6:36-7:3; 7:38-53;
`8:10-34; 11:1-6; 14:4-45;
`15:4-17:24; 17:44-50; 18:22-
`36; 20:13-21:44; 22:41-67
`Claims
`’522 patent: N/A
`’514 patent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 15,
`16, 17, 30, 31, 32
`’523 patent: 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 23,
`24, 25
`’524 patent: 7, 8, 9
`’618 patent: N/A
`’619 patent: 6, 7, 8, 9, 23, 24,
`25
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`AHD at pp. 671 (“provide”),
`891 (“update”)
`BDCIT at pp. 316
`(“microblogging”), 459
`(“social networking site”)
`Sworn testimony of the
`inventor, Patrick Nunally
`
`6:12-21, 10:46-49, 14:32-41,
`14:44-50, 14:55-62, 17:45-51,
`18:23-28, 15:13-16, 15:18-31,
`16:28-51, 17:4-12, 17:30-36,
`17:13-16, 20:42-50, 20:53-
`21:3, and Tables 1 and 2.
`Claims
`’514 patent: 3, 4, 16, 17, 30,
`and 32.
`’523 patent: 8, 23, and 25.
`’524 patent: 7 and 9.
`’619 patent: 6, 7, 8, 9, 23, 24,
`and 25.
`File History
`U.S. Patent & Trademark
`Office Prosecution Proceeding
`No. 13/047,206 for U.S.
`Patent No. 8,306,514 –
`Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in
`an Amendment at pp. 14-16,
`March 22, 2012.
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Dictionary of Computer and
`Internet Terms, at pp. 309,
`443
`[DROPCAM_EDTL_000010
`39-00001040].
`Sworn testimony of Dr. Earl
`Sacerdoti.
`
`III.
`
`Identification of Significant Claim Terms
`
`The parties hereby identify the following terms, in no particular order, whose
`
`construction will be most significant to the resolution of this case:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`“social signature”
`
`“social hierarchy”
`
`“sensor value range”
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-7-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page9 of 11
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`“information”
`
`“provide/ provides/ providing differing levels of information”
`
`“provided…/ provides/ providing an update”
`
`Plaintiff, e.Digital, does not believe construction of any of the above terms will be case or
`
`claim dispositive at this time.
`
`IV.
`
`Anticipated Length of Time Necessary for Claim Construction Hearing
`
`The parties anticipate they will need three (3) hours for the Claim Construction Hearing.
`
`V.
`
`Witnesses
`
`Neither party intends to call witnesses at the Claim Construction Hearing.
`
`Dated: July 31, 2015
`
`HANDAL & ASSOCIATES
`
`By: /s/ Gabriel G. Hedrick
`Anton N. Handal
`Pamela C. Chalk
`Gabriel G. Hedrick
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`e.Digital Corporation
`
`Dated: July 31, 2015
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`
`By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg
`Stefani E. Shanberg
`Attorneys for Defendant
`DROPCAM, INC.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-8-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page10 of 11
`
`ATTESTATION CLAUSE
`
`I, Madeleine E. Greene, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being
`
`used to file this Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement. In compliance with Civil
`
`Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Pamela Chalk of Handal & Associates has concurred in
`
`this filing.
`
`Dated: July 31, 2015
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Madeleine E. Greene
`Madeleine E. Greene
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`DROPCAM, INC.
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-9-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document71 Filed07/31/15 Page11 of 11
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 31, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk
`
`of the court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to counsel of
`
`record.
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Madeleine E. Greene
`Madeleine E. Greene
`
`AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST
`
`-10-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28