`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`IXI IP, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01444
`Patent 7,039,033
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01444
`Attorney Docket No: 00035-0004IP1
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order (Paper 9),
`
`
`
`Petitioners submit this Request for Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of
`
`unpatentability of U.S. Patent No. 7,039,033. Requests for Oral Argument in related
`
`IPR proceedings (IPR2015-01443, IPR2015-01445, and IPR2015-01446) are being
`
`filed on this same day.
`
`With regard to this particular proceeding, Petitioners request (without waiving
`
`consideration of any issue not listed below) to address the following issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 1, 4, 7, and 14 are obvious over Marchand, Nurmann, and
`
`Vilander pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`2. Whether claim 5 is obvious over Marchand, Nurmann, Vilander, and RFC
`
`2543 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`3. Whether claims 6 and 23 are obvious over Marchand, Nurmann, Vilander,
`
`and Larsson pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`4. Whether claims 12, 15, 22, 34, 39, 40, 42, and 46 are obvious over
`
`Marchand, Nurmann, Vilander, and JINI Spec. pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103(a);
`
`5. Whether claims 25 and 28 are obvious over Marchand, Larsson, and JINI
`
`Spec. pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`6. Any motions to exclude evidence by Patent Owner; and
`
`7. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01444
`Attorney Docket No: 00035-0004IP1
`8. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification. The Board
`
`has already scheduled Oral Hearing for September 15, 2016. Scheduling
`
`Order of December 30, 2015, Paper No. 9.
`
`Petitioners also respectfully request the ability to use audio visual equipment
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen that
`
`connects to a laptop computer. Petitioners’ counsel will use a laptop computer with
`
`a VGA-type connector. In addition, Petitioners request that an ELMO-type projector
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jeremy J. Monaldo/
`Jeremy J. Monaldo, Reg. No. 58,680
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`P.O. Box 1022
`Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022
`T: 202-626-6376
`F: 202-783-2331
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`be made available for use.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`August 3, 2016
`
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01444
`Attorney Docket No: 00035-0004IP1
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(1) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned certifies
`
`that on August 3, 2016, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioners’ Request for
`
`Oral Argument was provided via email to the Patent Owner by serving the email
`
`correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`Andy H. Chan
`Pepper Hamilton LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400
`Redwood City, CA 94065
`
`George S. Haight
`Pepper Hamilton LLP
`125 High Street
`19th Floor, High Street Tower
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Email: chana@pepperlaw.com
`Email: haightg@pepperlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`/Diana Bradley/
`
`Diana Bradley
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(858) 678-5667
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
