throbber
Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` Patent 7,295,532
`
`___________________________________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., )
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. )
`
`and APPLE, INC. ) Case No.
`
` Petitioner, ) IPR2015-01443
`
` v. )
`
`IXI IP, LLC, )
`
` Patent Owner. )
`
`___________________________________)
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION of
`
` NARAYAN B. MANDAYAM, Ph.D.
`
` May 18, 2016
`
` Pepper Hamilton, LLP
`
` 125 High Street
`
` Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Reporter: Michael D. O'Connor, RMR, CRR, CBC, CCP
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`Samsung v. IXI
`IPR2015-01444
`Exhibit 1018
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 2
`
` Wednesday, May 18, 2016
`
` 9:49 a.m.
`
` DEPOSITION OF NARAYAN B. MANDAYAM,
`
`Ph.D. at the offices of Pepper Hamilton, LLP, 125
`
`High Street, Boston, Massachusetts, before
`
`Michael D. O'Connor, a Registered Merit Reporter
`
`and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of
`
`Massachusetts.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`2
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
` COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER:
`
` FISH& RICHARDSON
`
` 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
`
` Redwood City, California 94063
`
` (650) 839-5070
`
` BY: KATHI VIDAL, ESQ.
`
` vidal@fr.com
`
` COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER:
`
` FISH& RICHARDSON
`
` 1425 K Street, N.W.
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
` (202) 783-5070
`
` BY: JEREMY J. MONALDO, ESQ.
`
` monaldo@fr.com
`
` COUNSEL FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`
` PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP
`
` 333 Twin Dolphin Drive
`
` Redwood City, California 94065
`
` (650) 802-3600
`
` BY: ANDY H. CHAN, ESQ.
`
` chana@pepperlaw.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`3
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 4
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S (continued)
`
` COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
`
` PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP
`
` 125 High Street
`
` Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`
` (617) 204-5100
`
` BY: GRIFFIN N. MESMER, ESQ.
`
` mesmerg@pepperlaw.com
`
`Also Present: Won S. Yoon, Technology
`
` Specialist/Patent Agent,
`
` Fish & Richardson
`
` Usman Khan, Technology
`
` Specialist/Patent Agent,
`
` Fish & Richardson
`
` Alex Daunais, Videographer
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`4
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 5
`
` I N D E X
`
`Deposition of:
`
`NARAYAN B. MANDAYAM
`
`Examination by: Page
`
` By Ms. Vidal 8
`
` -0-
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`5
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 6
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
`No. Page
`
`Exhibit 1013 U.S. Patent Application U.S. 102
`
` 202/0198958 A1
`
`Exhibit 1014 Patent Owner's response in 137
`
` IPR2015-01444
`
` -0-
`
` PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS REVIEWED
`
` BY THE WITNESS:
`
`Samsung 1001 United States Patent 47
`
` No.: US 7,295,532 B2
`
`Samsung 1005 International Publication 67
`
` No. WO 01/76154 A2
`
`Samsung 1006 Computer Communication Review 144
`
` -0-
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`6
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
` -------------
`
` VIDEOGRAPHER: We are on the record.
`
`This is the videographer Alex Daunais speaking.
`
`Today's date is May 18, 2016, and the time is
`
`9:49 a.m.
`
` We are here to take the deposition of
`
`Narayan Mandayam in the matter of Samsung
`
`Electronics Company Ltd., Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc. and Apple, Inc., versus IXI IP,
`
`LLC, case number IPR 2015-01443.
`
` Will counsel please state themselves.
`
` MS. VIDAL: Kathi Vidal representing
`
`Petitioner.
`
` MR. MONALDO: Jeremy Monaldo
`
`representing Petitioner.
`
` MR. YOON: Won Yoon representing
`
`Petitioner.
`
` MR. KHAN: Usman Khan representing
`
`Petitioner.
`
` MR. CHAN: Andy Chan representing
`
`Patent Owner. With me is my colleague, Griffin
`
`Mesmer.
`
` VIDEOGRAPHER: Would the court
`
`reporter please swear in the witness.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`7
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 8
`
` NARAYAN B. MANDAYAM
`
`having been satisfactorily identified by the
`
`production of his driver's license, and duly
`
`sworn by the Notary Public, was examined and
`
`testified as follows:
`
` DIRECT EXAMINATION
`
`BY MS. VIDAL:
`
` Q. Dr. Mandayam, could you please state
`
`your name for the record.
`
` A. Sure. My name is Narayan Mandayam.
`
` Q. Have you ever been deposed before,
`
`Dr. Mandayam?
`
` A. Yes, I have.
`
` Q. In what context?
`
` A. Basically in an IPR litigation, and
`
`even before that.
`
` Q. In one IPR litigation?
`
` A. Mostly two, two of them. I've also
`
`done a deposition before.
`
` Q. And which two IPR litigations were
`
`you deposed in?
`
` A. I don't remember the exact details,
`
`but they were related to wireless systems,
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`8
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`wireless networks, and location tracking. That
`
`was one of the aspects.
`
` Q. Who were you hired by in those two
`
`litigations?
`
` A. So I'm actually -- I was recruited by
`
`a consulting company, and the attorneys in the
`
`two IPR cases. The attorneys I worked with were
`
`from Pepper Hamilton.
`
` Q. And which company did you work for?
`
` A. I forget the exact name. Maybe it
`
`was something like Callwave. I'm sorry, I just
`
`don't remember.
`
` Q. That's fine. For each of those, what
`
`was your ultimate conclusion?
`
` A. I'm not sure what exactly that
`
`question means.
`
` Q. Were you asked to opine on whether
`
`the patents were valid or invalid?
`
` A. So I was actually asked to provide
`
`opinions on the validity of the patents.
`
` Q. And did you conclude that the patents
`
`were valid or invalid or was it a mix?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. Again, I don't remember the, you
`
`know, I don't remember the exact details. But I
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`9
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`believe I did conclude that, at least, the
`
`patents I was asked to analyze certain aspects of
`
`it, certain claims, and I believe I did conclude
`
`that they were valid.
`
` Q. So each claim in each of those
`
`petitions you concluded were valid?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. Again, I don't remember the details.
`
`But yeah, I would say yes.
`
` Q. And were you asked to opine on
`
`anticipation?
`
` A. I'm really sorry, I don't remember
`
`enough.
`
` Q. Were you asked to opine on
`
`obviousness?
`
` A. I believe so. But again, I don't
`
`remember the details of this.
`
` Q. When were your depositions in those
`
`two cases?
`
` A. Probably sometime in the last two
`
`years. Again, I can't remember exactly.
`
` Q. Last two years?
`
` A. Yeah, sometime in the last two years,
`
`I would think.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`10
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Do you know when the most recent one
`
`was?
`
` A. Last year.
`
` Q. 2015?
`
` A. I think, again -- I don't remember,
`
`to tell you the truth. I think it was in the
`
`last two years. I have to go -- I'm sorry, I
`
`don't have a clear answer on that for you.
`
` Q. That's fine. And you mentioned that
`
`you had been deposed before those two
`
`depositions; is that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And when was that?
`
` A. Probably over five years ago or
`
`something like that. Again...
`
` Q. And what was the context of that
`
`deposition?
`
` A. That also had to do with essentially
`
`wireless. Again, my expertise is wireless,
`
`systems wireless networks, systems technologies
`
`related to that.
`
` Q. Were you acting as an expert in a
`
`case?
`
` A. Yes, I believe so.
`
` Q. Was it only one case?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`11
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I really don't have a good
`
`recollection of it. I'm sorry.
`
` Q. Do you recall the parties in that
`
`matter?
`
` A. No. Unfortunately, no or
`
`fortunately, no.
`
` Q. Was that work for Pepper Hamilton as
`
`well?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Do you know who that work was for?
`
` A. No, I don't remember.
`
` Q. Is there anything that would prevent
`
`you from testifying truthfully and fully today?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. And you understand that over the next
`
`three days you're going to be asked to testify on
`
`IPR 2015-01443, 01444, 01445 and 01446?
`
` A. Yes, that is my understanding, yes.
`
` Q. And we're going to start with 01443,
`
`which relates to the '532 patent. I'm going to
`
`start by asking you some general questions about
`
`your background and understanding.
`
` A. Sure.
`
` MS. VIDAL: My understanding is that
`
`I only need to ask those in this one deposition
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`12
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`that you don't want me to repeat that for each
`
`deposition; is that correct?
`
` MR. CHAN: My understanding is that
`
`previously we didn't have an agreement as to all
`
`the background questions, but I think if you ask
`
`him specific questions about his background here,
`
`and they carry over, you can ask him in the next
`
`proceeding whether or not he agrees with --
`
` MS. VIDAL: Okay.
`
` MR. CHAN: Because I think they're
`
`separate depositions basically.
`
` MS. VIDAL: Okay.
`
` MR. CHAN: So I want to make the
`
`record clear so that there's no need to then, I
`
`guess, incorporate by reference or that kind of
`
`thing.
`
` MS. VIDAL: Okay.
`
` MR. CHAN: So I think to the extent
`
`that there's direct overlap of those same
`
`questions, and Dr. Mandayam provides his answers,
`
`and I think you ask him in his next proceeding
`
`whether or not he agrees with those things or he
`
`has anything to change, I think that should be
`
`fine.
`
` MS. VIDAL: Okay.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`13
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. So what I'm going to do is I'm going
`
`to ask you a series of what I'm going to call
`
`background questions. I'll let you know when
`
`I've moved on and no longer asking background
`
`questions.
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. In your next three depositions, I'm
`
`going to ask you if you have anything to change
`
`or if you, you know, can confirm --
`
` A. Okay. So can I look at the
`
`transcript of what I said about -- I just wanted
`
`to know. When you say --
`
` Q. I'll get back to you on that.
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. I will ask if you have any different
`
`answers in the next couple of days.
`
` A. Okay. Sounds good.
`
` Q. Are you currently employed other than
`
`as an expert, Dr. Mandayam?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And what is your occupation?
`
` A. So I'm a professor, actually a
`
`distinguished professor at Rutgers University, in
`
`New Jersey. So I'm a faculty member in the
`
`department of electrical and computer
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`14
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`engineering.
`
` And I'm also the associate director
`
`of an Industrial University Cooperative Research
`
`Center called WIN Lab. It stands for the
`
`Wireless Information Network Laboratory.
`
` Q. And you have a Ph.D.; is that
`
`correct?
`
` A. Yes, I do.
`
` Q. What year did you graduate with your
`
`Ph.D.?
`
` A. 1994.
`
` Q. During your Ph.D., and shortly
`
`thereafter, what areas of research did you focus
`
`on?
`
` A. Basically I have been working on
`
`wireless networks, wireless technology since
`
`1989. That has been, you know, various aspects
`
`of the wireless systems.
`
` Q. Which specific aspects were you
`
`focused on for your Ph.D.?
`
` A. So my Ph.D. at the time I was working
`
`on something called code division multiple access
`
`systems, also referred to as CDMA. I also did
`
`some work on both radio aspects of it as well as
`
`how to use something like that in a context of
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`15
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`optical networks.
`
` Q. And were those all long-range
`
`networks versus short range?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. So I'm not sure what exactly that
`
`question means. CDMA has been the technology
`
`that's been used for various applications -- I
`
`mean various system scenarios. Historically it
`
`started with the defense where essentially these
`
`technologies were first actually founded in the
`
`context of defense, going back to the second
`
`world war.
`
` So it really had very many benefits
`
`for that type of communications. So I would say
`
`the popularity of CDMA for more commercial
`
`mainstream communications happened primarily with
`
`second generation cellular systems. That's how
`
`it started.
`
` Also, as I said, this question of
`
`short range versus long range, it has been used
`
`in various contexts over a long period of time.
`
` Q. Do you understand what a WAN is?
`
` A. Yes, I do.
`
` Q. What is a WAN?
`
` A. A term that is generically used to
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`16
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`describe a wide area network. So it could have
`
`many components to it.
`
` Q. Is CDMA used in WANs?
`
` A. Yes, in some WANs CDMA is used.
`
` Q. What is your understanding of what a
`
`LAN is?
`
` A. Again, it stands for a local area
`
`network. So LAN is a local area network. So
`
`it's typically a short-range network.
`
` Q. And is CDMA used in LANs?
`
` A. There is some what's called direct
`
`sequence spread spectrum techniques that are
`
`used. For instance, in some of the early
`
`versions of wireless LANs.
`
` Q. Was any of your Ph.D. work on those
`
`direct spread spectrums?
`
` A. Direct sequence spread spectrum CDMA.
`
`So if you're looking for an acronym it's DSSS
`
`CDMA.
`
` Q. Was any of your Ph.D. work focused on
`
`DSSS CDMA?
`
` A. Yes, it was.
`
` Q. What aspect of DSSS CDMA of your
`
`Ph.D. focused on?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`17
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I was basically interested in
`
`designing transceivers, essentially algorithms to
`
`improve performance. There are many aspects to
`
`it.
`
` Q. Did those transceivers apply in both
`
`the wide area as well as the local area context?
`
` A. Yes. DSSS CDMA, as I said, is a
`
`generic technique. So...
`
` Q. What do you mean by "generic
`
`technique"?
`
` A. Meaning it's essentially a strategy
`
`for how you design your transmission sequence.
`
`So it can very well be used in the context of any
`
`type of network.
`
` I'm sorry, I have a little bit of
`
`allergies, some postnasal drip. I will be
`
`clearing my throat quite frequently. I
`
`apologize.
`
` Q. Of course. If you need to take a
`
`break at any time, that's okay as well.
`
` So would you say that DSSS CDMA is
`
`network agnostic?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. I'm not even sure what that question
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`18
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`means. It's really physical layer technology.
`
` Q. By physical layer, are you referring
`
`to the OSI stack?
`
` A. Yes, typically at the -- I'm not sure
`
`I'm -- physical layer basically is a term that is
`
`associated with techniques that are used where
`
`you do the actual transmission of signals.
`
` Q. What are the other layers of the OSI
`
`stack besides the physical layer?
`
` A. Usually it's the physical layer, and
`
`then there's a data link and MAC layer above it,
`
`and then there's a network layer, transport
`
`layer, application layer.
`
` Q. The layers you just listed are from
`
`the bottom up; is that correct?
`
` A. Yes. That's how they usually -- it's
`
`just a way to depict things. So it's usually
`
`like that.
`
` Q. What generally happens at the
`
`physical layer?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. The physical layer usually has to do
`
`with the design of waveforms, signals that you
`
`transmit. Perhaps there might be some
`
`overlapping strategies that you use for encoding,
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`19
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`decoding signals.
`
` Q. You said the next layer up was the
`
`data link/MAC layer; is that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. What happens at that layer?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. So those layers typically you try to
`
`sort of design mechanisms by which the medium
`
`that is being used can be shared. MAC stands for
`
`medium access control.
`
` Q. And the next layer up is the network
`
`layer, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. What happens at the network layer?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. So usually, again, it's sort of --
`
`it's hard to characterize what happened. There
`
`are many things that happen. So generically the
`
`network layer is associated with, in some sense,
`
`directing traffic, you know, from a source to,
`
`say, a destination. So it's in a network.
`
` Q. So is another word for directing
`
`traffic routing?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. No. Routing is actually a generic
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`20
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 21
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`term that can be used in many contexts. So I
`
`wouldn't really characterize it like that. But
`
`it's really sort of to make associations between
`
`the source and destination in the context of a
`
`network.
`
` Q. In the OSI model, does routing from
`
`source to destination in the context of a network
`
`occur at the network layer?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. You know, so that's why I said,
`
`routing is determined by many factors. For
`
`instance, it also sometimes has to do with the
`
`underlying PHY and MAC technology. Sorry,
`
`physical layer and MAC layer techniques.
`
` So therefore, to answer your
`
`question, you can characterize it in that way.
`
` Q. Are IP packets routed at the network
`
`layer?
`
` A. I'm sorry, what is that?
`
` Q. Are IP packets routed at the network
`
`layer?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection to form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. Yes. So typically networking layer
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`21
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 22
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`protocols, IPs, yes, is associated with the
`
`networking layer protocol.
`
` Q. What happens at the transport layer?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. So transport layer is typically sort
`
`of associated with doing what is called an
`
`end-to-end quality of service. So you can try to
`
`make sure that you have some end-to-end
`
`performance guarantees between source and
`
`destination.
`
` Q. Your lawyer is going to object to my
`
`questions. That's for later. It's part of the
`
`process. Just please give him a second to object
`
`so that he can object, that gets on the record,
`
`and then you can answer.
`
` A. Okay. I will do a delayed start.
`
` Q. It makes everything easier for
`
`everyone.
`
` A. I will also speak slowly, because
`
`I've had experience in the past where my bit rate
`
`is too high. So I will work on that, too.
`
` Q. What happens at the application layer
`
`of the OSI model?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. So an application layer is typically
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`22
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 23
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`associated with the application that will run
`
`over these connections that you've established.
`
`And again, when you say what happens, we can
`
`spend three days going over what happens.
`
` Q. I think your answers are great.
`
` A. An application layer is also
`
`sometimes used to sort of, you know, establish
`
`sessions.
`
` So again, the original OSI layers and
`
`stack, there was a historic way in which it kind
`
`of was established, and then there has been so
`
`many, if you will, enhancements that some of
`
`these layers, in fact, some of the more modern
`
`research really gets into doing things that
`
`perhaps historically you would not have thought
`
`of doing.
`
` Q. Do you know what JINI is?
`
` A. (Witness nods).
`
` Q. Please actually say your answer so we
`
`can get it for the record?
`
` A. JINI.
`
` Q. You know what that is?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. What is JINI?
`
` A. It's basically a Java-based
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`23
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 24
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`framework, tele-programming based framework, that
`
`allows services to be discovered and shared in
`
`networks.
`
` Q. What do you mean by "framework"?
`
` A. Framework is what it is. I mean...
`
` Q. Is it an application?
`
` A. So it's basically a set of rules for
`
`how it works using Java programs.
`
` Q. What is Java?
`
` A. It's a programming language.
`
` Q. It's one of many programming
`
`languages?
`
` A. Sure.
`
` Q. In terms of your research and
`
`technical expertise before 2001, did any of it
`
`focus on JINI or Java?
`
` A. So that's a weird question, because
`
`-- so my research is about wireless networks,
`
`wireless systems. So if I do research on Java or
`
`JINI, no, I don't.
`
` However, Java or JINI is just a
`
`framework that allows you to make assumptions
`
`about how you can model networks or what you can
`
`assume about nodes in a network are capable of
`
`doing. That's sort of a more precise statement.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`24
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 25
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. You don't have any papers on JINI, do
`
`you? You haven't written any papers on JINI?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. Do you mean like research papers?
`
` Q. Yes.
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Do you have any U.S. patents?
`
` A. Do I have any U.S. patents? No.
`
`Although, I have tried to get one.
`
` Q. One U.S. patent?
`
` A. Yeah.
`
` Q. Have you tried to apply for patents
`
`in any other country?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. What did you try to get a U.S. patent
`
`on?
`
` A. Basically, again, related to access
`
`to information in wireless networks, specifically
`
`in the context of, I would say, very short-range
`
`networks, meaning sort of -- the idea was about
`
`information that is cached and stored in
`
`repositories, and you enable access and download
`
`to these -- this information, you know, when
`
`users are in very close proximity.
`
` So that way it allows you to get lots
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`25
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 26
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`of information without worrying about bandwidth.
`
`So the idea was a system concept called Info
`
`Stations.
`
` Q. Could that work apply to JINI?
`
` A. In JINI, it's just a software
`
`framework that allows you to share devices, and
`
`-- I mean, share services. So the system
`
`basically can be architected to, I would say, you
`
`know, that was not a consideration for a patent,
`
`if you're asking that.
`
` It was really about the idea of how
`
`do you sort of get over the lack of bandwidth for
`
`large amounts of information.
`
` Q. Could somebody develop a system that
`
`both uses JINI and your patent?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
` A. I really have not been given any
`
`thought to that. So it's hard for me to give you
`
`an answer to that question.
`
` Q. What about any of the research that
`
`you did, could any of that apply to JINI or be
`
`used with JINI?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. Again, I'm saying -- I find this
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`26
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`question completely -- I don't have any context
`
`for this question, seriously.
`
` Q. Okay. So would it be accurate to say
`
`that you've not done any research at all in the
`
`JINI area or never worked in that area?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection to form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. As I said, as we -- sorry. Finish
`
`your objections.
`
` MR. CHAN: Yes. I think it's on the
`
`record.
`
` A. As I told you, a wireless network, a
`
`telecommunication network, a telecommunication
`
`network, has all of these layers in the protocol
`
`stack. So people work on, you know, everything
`
`comes together because different people work on
`
`different things, and then sort of it is
`
`harmonized into a system.
`
` So this question that you're asking
`
`me about, I really don't get it.
`
` Q. Could JINI harmonize into a system
`
`that also incorporates teachings from your work?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection to form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. I have not given it a thought,
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`27
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 28
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`seriously. Something to think about.
`
` Q. So if you were to characterize your
`
`background in JINI, when you first learned about
`
`it or what your knowledge is of JINI, how would
`
`you characterize that?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection. Form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. I cannot give you an exact answer to
`
`that, because as somebody who has been working in
`
`this field for over 25 years now, there are so
`
`many developments that happen at various times,
`
`as I said, by different people in different
`
`fields who work in these things.
`
` I would say every development informs
`
`other developments. So, you know, how you go
`
`about architecting models, how you start thinking
`
`about problems, they evolve.
`
` Q. When did you first hear about JINI?
`
` A. At about the time when, perhaps, Java
`
`became popular, and then JINI became popular. So
`
`I don't have an exact time frame. I'm sorry. I
`
`don't remember.
`
` Q. Was it before 2001?
`
` A. I really cannot answer that. I
`
`really don't know. I don't remember.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`28
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 29
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. So you can't say that in 2001 you
`
`were familiar with JINI?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection to form.
`
`Foundation.
`
` A. I don't remember. That's my answer.
`
` I have to remember to do the delayed
`
`start. Sorry.
`
` Q. What is 802.11?
`
` A. It's a wireless local area networking
`
`technology.
`
` Q. Did you do any work in the 802.11
`
`area before 2001?
`
` A. I'm trying to think. You know, I
`
`cannot remember off the top of my head. I mean,
`
`I worked on 802.11 for a long time, on various
`
`aspects of it. But I don't -- I cannot remember,
`
`to tell you the truth.
`
` Q. So you can't say as of 2001 you had
`
`done any work in 802.11; is that correct?
`
` MR. CHAN: Objection to form.
`
` A. Again, when you say 802.11, 802.11 is
`
`a standard, and a standard for how a holistic
`
`system works, and there are various aspects of
`
`it. Again, people work on it. There's an OSI
`
`stack. Different people work on different
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`29
`
`

`
`Narayan B. Mandayam, Ph.D. - May 18, 2016
`
`Page 30
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`elements of it. Things, then, sort of come
`
`together.
`
` As I said -- one thing I can tell you
`
`for sure, I worked at this place called WIN Lab.
`
`I'm an associate director of the Wireless
`
`Information Network Laboratory. So we have been
`
`in existence since 1989.
`
` We do what is called a free
`
`competitive research. So we work on topics that
`
`perhaps will come to fruition maybe five years
`
`down the road, sometimes ten years down the road.
`
`So we work on a lot advanced concept

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket