UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRADIUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01432
`Patent 7,139,794 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF MR. EVAN S. DAY
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRADIUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01432
`Patent 7,139,794 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF MR. EVAN S. DAY
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2015-01432
`Petitioner's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. Evan S. Day
`
`
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Petitioner”) respectfully requests that the
`
`Board admit Evan S. Day as back-up counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Mr. Day is litigation counsel for Petitioner in the district court litigation
`
`involving U.S. Patent No. 7,139,794, and two other related patents U.S. Patent
`
`Nos. 7,908,343 and 8,924,506, and has substantial knowledge in the substantive
`
`issues of the invalidity of the challenged claims of the ‘794 Patent in this
`
`proceeding. In addition, Mr. Day has experience in IPR and CBM proceedings
`
`before the Board and is familiar with the rules and procedures for IPR and CBM
`
`proceedings. Therefore, Mr. Day meets the requirements of “an experienced
`
`litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue
`
`in the proceeding” under 37 C.F.R. §42.10(c).
`
`1. Time For Filing
`
`
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission has been authorized by the Notice
`
`of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary
`
`Response that was mailed on June 26, 2015 (Paper 3). This Motion is filed no
`
`sooner than twenty one (21) days after service of the petition.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2015-01432
`Petitioner's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. Evan S. Day
`
`2.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`
`
`In this proceeding, lead counsel for Petitioner is Bing Ai, a registered
`
`practitioner. The following statement of facts show that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to admit Mr. Day pro hac vice.
`
`
`
`Mr. Day is a patent litigation attorney with more than 4 years of experience
`
`representing clients in cases involving computer hardware and software, Internet
`
`and e-commerce, hand held computers and other mobile devices, optics, displays,
`
`user interfaces, mapping services, audio applications, image processing, and digital
`
`graphics. (Affidavit of Evan S. Day (“Day Affidavit”), ¶ 8 in Exhibit 1016.)
`
`
`
`Mr. Day regularly litigates patent cases in various forums including various
`
`federal district courts, and the International Trade Commission (Id.) He has
`
`experience representing clients in many phases of litigation including discovery,
`
`Markman hearings, and trial. (Id.) Mr. Day ’s biography is attached to the Day
`
`Affidavit (Exhibit 1016) as Appendix A.
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,139,794, and two other related patents, U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`7,908,343 and 8,924,506, are currently asserted against Petitioner in a co-pending
`
`litigation, Bradium Techs. LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 1:15-cv-00031-RGA, filed in
`
`the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on January 9, 2015 (“the co-
`
`pending litigation”). That litigation led to the inter partes review proceeding under
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2015-01432. (Id. at ¶ 9.)
`
`2
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2015-01432
`Petitioner's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. Evan S. Day
`
`
`
`Mr. Day is counsel for Petitioner in the co-pending litigation and, as such,
`
`oversees and handles all phases of the litigation from discovery through trial. (Id.
`
`at ¶ 10.) Mr. Day is familiar with the technologies and issued claims in Patent No.
`
`7,139,794, prior art references and invalidity grounds based on the prior art. (Id.)
`
`
`
`In addition, Mr. Day has handled multiple IPR proceedings before the Board
`
`and is familiar with the rules and procedures for IPR and CBM proceedings in
`
`general. Notably, Mr. Day has significant knowledge on the specific issues raised
`
`in this IPR proceeding.
`
`
`
`Petitioner has invested significant financial resources in the related matter in
`
`which Mr. Day serves as counsel. Petitioner therefore respectfully submits that
`
`there is good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. Day as counsel pro hac vice
`
`during this proceeding.
`
`3. Affidavit or Declaration of Individual Seeking to Appear
`
`
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by an Affidavit of
`
`Mr. Day (Exhibit 1016), which attests to the requirements for pro hac vice
`
`admission set forth in the PTAB decision in the IPR proceeding of Unified Patent
`
`v. Parallel Iron, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, dated Oct. 15, 2013.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2015-01432
`Petitioner's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. Evan S. Day
`
`4. Conclusion
`
`
`
`Accordingly, Petitioners submit that there is good cause under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10(c) for the Board to admit Evan S. Day as counsel pro hac vice and to
`
`authorize Mr. Day to represent Petitioner as back-up counsel in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Bing Ai/
`Lead Counsel
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Matthew Bernstein, Pro Hac Vice
`Vinay Sathe, Reg. No. 55,595
`Patrick J. McKeever, Reg. No. 66,019
`Evan Day, Pro Hac Vice
`
`Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation
`
`
`4
`
`Dated: July 8, 2016
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2015-01432
`Petitioner's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. Evan S. Day
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION UNDER 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and Exhibit 1016 were served in their entirety this Eighth day of
`
`July 2016 by electronic mail as agreed upon by the parties on the Patent Owner via
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL
`Michael N. Zachary
`mzachary@kenyon.com
`KENYON & KENYON, LLP
`1801 Page Mill Road, Ste 210
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Clifford Ulrich
`culrich@kenyon.com
`KENYON & KENYON, LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Bing Ai/
`Lead Counsel
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Matthew Bernstein, Pro Hac Vice
`Vinay Sathe, Reg. No. 55,595
`Patrick J. McKeever, Reg. No. 66,019
`Evan Day, Pro Hac Vice
`
`Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation
`
`1
`
`its attorneys of record:
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`Christopher J. Coulson
`ccoulson@kenyon.com
`KENYON & KENYON, LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`
`Bradiumiprservice@kenyon.com
`
`
`Dated: July 8, 2016
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
